Besides targeting additional F-22 fighters, the White House’s statement of administration policy on the proposed House version of the 2010 defense authorization bill had several complaints about Congressional plans for USAF aircraft programs. In addition to the purported veto threat over the F-22 (see above Hollow Threat), the policy statement issued another veto threat over the alternate engine for the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, saying such expenditures “impede the progress of the overall JSF program” and declaring that “alleged risks of a fleet-wide grounding due to a single engine are exaggerated.” The Administration also expressed its objection to constraints Congress would put on the Air Force’s ability to retire C-5 strategic airlifters and aircraft retirements in general, a reference to the Air Force’s plan to retire 254 fighters in 2010.
Boeing Claims Progress on T-7 and Other Challenged Programs
April 25, 2025
Boeing appears to have become to overcome the problems that led to billions in losses on fixed-price defense contracts in recent years, point the company back toward profitabily, says Boeing president and CEO Kelly Ortberg.