C-130 Pilots Test Out ‘Entirely New’ Cockpit For Aging ‘H’ Models

C-130 Pilots Test Out ‘Entirely New’ Cockpit For Aging ‘H’ Models

Pilots at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., are testing out a new cockpit layout for the C-130H transport plane that will replace its analog gauges with glass multifunction displays, digital engine instruments, a new flight management system, autopilot, terrain awareness and warning system and other digital upgrades that should make the aircraft safer and easier to fly.

“This is much larger than just a software or hardware upgrade,” Maj. Jacob Duede, an experimental test pilot with the 417th Flight Test Squadron, said in an Oct. 17 press release. “It’s reconstructing and modernizing the aircraft’s entire cockpit area.”

An old workhorse, the C-130H has been in service since 1965, though the average age of today’s fleet is about 30 years. The Active-Duty Air Force has switched entirely to the newer C-130J Super Hercules, but the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Command still fly more than 100 of the H models, and in recent years, the Air Force has upgraded several dozen H models with new propellers, better radios, navigation systems, and voice and flight data recorders. 

c-130h
The newly all digital C-130H cockpit sits ready for its next test flight at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., Sept. 29, 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Samuel King Jr.

Those upgrades made up Avionics Modernization Program (AMP) Increment One, but more changes are on the way with AMP Increment Two, which the pilots at Eglin have been testing out since August. At least 23 Air Force Reserve and 54 Air National Guard H models will receive the second upgrade over the next five years for about $7 million per aircraft, the release stated.

Among the changes, a new flight management system should help pilots save time and reduce the chance of errors when uploading route information.

“Aircrew essentially had to print the directions before flying and then type the information in using latitude and longitude or use ground-based navigation aids,” Duede said about the old systems. “This new mod is the newest GPS navigation with a by-name search function and autopilot, all built into the aircraft.”

Instead of taking minutes to enter new latitude and longitude coordinates from a tablet or laptop into the aircraft computer, pilots flying the upgraded H can just point and click their new destination on a glass display in less than 30 seconds.

“The new process is as quick as the first step of the old process,” Duede said. “You just identify the point on the moving map, grab it, and execute the flight plan.”

There is also a significant safety upgrade in the form of the Integrated Terrain Awareness and Warning System, which detects when the aircraft is coming too close to the ground and warns the crew while they still have time to course correct. The new system is built into the aircraft, rather than being carried aboard tablets and laptops as is the case today.

A new terrain awareness and warning system could be useful for many C-130 missions that involve flying close to the ground, such as aerial firefighting, aerial spraying, and low-altitude airdrops. 

c-130
A C-130 Hercules aircraft assigned to the 153rd Airlift Wing, Wyoming Air National Guard, comes in for a landing at the Jeffco Airtanker base, Colorado for annual Modular Airborne Fire System training May 13, 2021. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Tech. Sgt. Jon Alderman)

Only three of the H model’s original analog gauges will survive AMP Increment Two, which will include six multifunction displays. Such a transition affects flight deck workflow, where aircrew must quickly scan instruments to perform complicated procedures like aerial refueling or landing at night in bad weather. The big change called for a thorough testing process.

“This is an entirely new system,” Caleb Reeves, a test engineer who helped design the test plan for the 417th FLTS, said in the release. “Everything we’re testing here is being done for the first time ever in this aircraft. We’re also examining if these untried systems perform in the ways we thought they would or not. That data allows us to adjust our testing and provide feedback to the manufacturer.”

Some of the tests involve flying at terrain and obstacles to make sure the new warning systems work. The 417th will complete developmental testing for the first H model to receive the Increment Two upgrade by the end of the year before sending it to the Air National Guard/Air Force Reserve Command Test Center in Little Rock, Ark., for operational testing. Developmental testing gauges the performance of new systems, while operational testing does so under realistic operating environments

Pilots from Little Rock augmented Eglin crews during developmental testing so that they are better prepared for the upgraded H arrival. More C-130s are expected to begin developmental testing at Eglin later this month.

Airpower Expert: Israel Not Hamstrung by Human Shields in Gaza

Airpower Expert: Israel Not Hamstrung by Human Shields in Gaza

Israel can use its airpower against Hamas despite the use of “human shields,” so long as the attacking forces make reasonable efforts to minimize casualties and ensure that the attack is proportional and the aimpoints are legitimate military targets, according to airpower theorist and practitioner, retired USAF Lt. Gen. David Deptula.

Deptula, who oversaw allied targeting in Operation Desert Storm and is now dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, also commented on the broader strategic implications of the fresh conflict between Israel and Hamas.

Israeli aircraft have pounded the Gaza region in recent days with air strikes, and Deptula argued that such strikes against Hamas centers of gravity—like command centers, munitions factories and weapon depots that Hamas has located under schools, hospitals, and mosques—are legitimate targets under the Geneva Conventions. Furthermore, Deptula cited the Rome Statute of 1998, which states that non-state actors, such as terrorist groups, can be culpable for war crimes.

“It’s important to understand that Hamas’ use of civilians as human shields is … illegal in accordance with the Geneva Conventions, as well as the laws of armed conflict, and they fall into the category of war crimes,” Deptula said. Retaliatory attacks against civilian-ringed Hamas targets is permissible, “if the potential damage to civilians is not excessive, in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.”

“At the same time, it’s important to note that even if Hamas uses human shields, Israel is still bound by the principle of proportionality in exercising all these precautions to minimize harm to civilians,” Deptula said. “They have a very strong history of doing that. But that does not mean that they cannot strike targets because of the presence of those human shields.”

Expected civilian losses “must be weighed against the military advantage anticipated if the military objective is achieved,” Deptula said.

As Israel’s counterattack against Hamas takes shape, the public must understand the laws of armed conflict and how Hamas has violated them, Deptula said.

In an Oct. 16 press briefing, Pentagon spokesperson Sabrina Singh was asked whether the U.S. is requiring Israel to explain or document how it is using American-supplied weapons, or whether the U.S. is concerned that Israel will use the weapons disproportionately or vindictively in reprisal for Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks that killed hundreds of civilians.

“We expect Israel to uphold the laws of war. They are a professional military, a democracy that we hold to a very high standard, and we expect them to do the same,” Singh said.

Strategic Implications

The war in Gaza highlights the need for the U.S. to “retool” its national military strategy, Deptula said, arguing that the Pentagon “needs to go back to force-sizing based on a two-major-regional war” construct.

“While we have the most impressive military personnel in the world, our military today is simply not sized or equipped to succeed in even one major regional war, much less two,” he said. “ … So we better get our act together,” he said.

Deptula linked Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine with the Israel-Hamas conflict, saying in both cases adversaries took action “because they see a weak United States military, which lacks the will to employ force and even when it does, the forces are “insufficient … in capacity.”

The two conflicts are also tied together, Deptula argued, because a war in Israel benefits Russia by creating a second demand on U.S. munitions, already challenged by supplying Ukraine.

It also gives Russia an opportunity to “conduct information operations that will just feed those unfortunate narratives” that somehow Ukraine or Israel are the aggressors, and the U.S. should withhold its support for Ukraine and Israel, Deptula added.

Meanwhile, China is “certainly … considering a move on Taiwan at this time,” while the U.S. is logistically committed to two other wars, Deptula asserted.

The key to deterring China—as well as other potential adversaries like the militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon—is to “get them to understand the willingness of the United States to actually use force if in fact, aggression is perpetrated by … any of those entities,” Deptula said.

Hezbollah, in particular, must understand and believe the U.S. will strike if it attempts to open a second front with Israel.

“There cannot be any invisible red lines,” Deptula said. Deterrence requires an unambiguous and undoubted threat of force, and must go well beyond simply saying, “‘Don’t.’”

The U.S. must also go beyond simple messaging like landing B-52 bombers in South Korea or dispatching carrier strike groups to the Mediterranean, Deptula said.

“Our national leaders must meet the moment and realize that there is a severe cost for prioritizing politics over national security,” he said.

“Our leadership has got to pass a federal budget so the Defense Department can be funded” to address the “new complexities” of the geopolitical situation, and at a level “more than just the funds that we spent last year,” Deptula said. “A [continuing resolution] puts a halt on new starts and all kinds of things that we need to do, and that inhibits our ability to assist Ukraine and Israel with the military equipment that they need to survive.”

On top of that, “we’ve got to get to a common vision to get past the impasse in getting a Speaker of the House Representatives,” Deptula said, as the current situation sends a message of indecisiveness and division that plays to the advantage of world adversaries.

Moreover, “the U.S. military today struggles to meet the demands in one theater, let alone four,” meaning Europe, the Middle East, the Pacific, and the homeland, he said. National security “needs to become a talking point on the campaign train,” he said. “The world’s on fire, and the United States is woefully underprepared, and that demands a national conversation.”

B-52 Stratofortress to Land in South Korea for First Time in Decades

B-52 Stratofortress to Land in South Korea for First Time in Decades


Editor’s Note: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated this is the first time ever a B-52 has landed in South Korea. It is the first time in at least three decades. Air & Space Forces Magazine regrets this error.

The U.S. Air Force is celebrating the 70th anniversary of the U.S.-South Korea alliance with a huge display of airpower at the 2023 Seoul International Aerospace and Defense Exhibition this week.

Most notably, a B-52H Stratofortress is slated to land on the Korean Peninsula for the event—the first time the famed bomber has touched down in South Korea in at least 30 years, according to the Seventh Air Force.

Also during the exhibition, scheduled from Oct. 17. to 22 in Seoul Air Base, the USAF will show off eight other kinds of aircraft through static displays and aerial demonstrations, according to Pacific Air Forces, including:

  • F-22 Raptor
  • F-16 Fighting Falcon
  • A-10 Thunderbolt II
  • C-17 Globemaster III
  • C-5 Galaxy
  • KC-135 Stratotanker
  • U-2 Dragon Lady
  • E-3 Sentry

The nuclear-capable B-52 is set to execute two flyovers before landing elsewhere in the nation.

A U.S. Air Force B-52H Stratofortress assigned to the 20th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, departs from Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, July 10, 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Nia Jacobs

“These flyovers, air demonstrations and static displays, including the landing for the B-52 on the peninsula, is part of our continued pledge to promote peace, stability and prosperity on the Korean peninsula.” said Maj. Rachel Buitrago, 7th Air Force Public Affairs director, in a release.

The B-52 Stratofortress, known as the BUFF, is the Air Force’s primary standoff cruise missile carrier. The H model is now the last serving variant of the Stratofortress, which has been in service since the 1950s.

While the B-52 has rarely landed in Korea, it has conducted several recent drills near or over the Korean Peninsula. On June 30, multiple B-52s from Barksdale Air Force Base, along with F-16s, F-15Es, and South Korean F-35As and KF-16s, conducted a joint flyover of the nation.

Then, on July 13, the long-range bomber was accompanied by F-16s and three ROK Air Force F-15K aircraft for a combined air training session over the peninsula. That exercise followed claims from North Korea that it launched a solid-fueled intercontinental ballistic missile on July 12, with the capacity to reach the continental United States.

North Korea has continued to carry out numerous missile launches this year, including the most recent test in September when it fired two short-range ballistic missiles into the sea off the eastern coast.

“We still face ongoing challenges from North Korea, including its dangerous and destabilizing missile testing program, and from others who would undermine the rules-based international order,” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said in April, when he welcomed South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol to the Pentagon.

Austin and President Joe Biden have pledged to ramp up joint military exercises between the U.S. and South Korea, including those with nuclear-capable assets like strategic bombers or ballistic missile submarines. Just last week, the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan made a port call in Busan, South Korea.

“2023 marks 70 years of alliance between the United States and the Republic of Korea—one that has proven ironclad in the face of challenges over the many decades. It is among the most interoperable, capable, and dynamic bilateral alliances in the world,” Lt. Gen. Scott Pleus, Seventh Air Force commander and U.S. Forces Korea deputy commander, said in a statement.

“We are honored to demonstrate our commitment to this partnership through our U.S. participation in Seoul ADEX 23 as part of our continued pledge to promote peace, stability and prosperity on the Korean peninsula,” Pleus added.

This biennial exhibition, the largest of its kind in Northeast Asia, presents aircraft, ground equipment, aerial demonstrations, and draws aviation and aerospace experts and defense personnel from around the world.

Air Force TACPs Test Out New Comms Technology for Disaster Response

Air Force TACPs Test Out New Comms Technology for Disaster Response

Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) Airmen with the Texas Air National Guard’s 147th Air Support Operations Squadron recently teamed up with Texas state agencies in Austin to try out a new technology that should help military and civilian first responders save lives faster in a natural disaster or humanitarian support mission.

Normally when multiple agencies from across the government arrive at an area without cell service, they have to figure out how to communicate across multiple frequencies and types of communications equipment.

“The biggest challenge when it comes to humanitarian assistance or disaster response is communication,” Maj. Kristopher Bartels, a special warfare officer with the 147 ASOS, told Air & Space Forces Magazine. “On a mission, I may carry three different radios and I’m managing multiple nets and multiple people.”

But at the Austin event, the 147 ASOS, the Texas Counterdrug Task Force, Texas Game Warden, Texas Task Force-1, an urban search and rescue unit, and other agencies had a new tool that allowed them to communicate easily without cell service. The goTenna Pro X2 is a radio about the size of a barbecue lighter. When two users each have a Pro X2, they can pair it with an app on their smartphones to exchange texts and location data, even if satellites or cell towers are offline. Since multiple Pro X2s can form a mesh network, they can be daisy-chained to cover tens of thousands of square miles, through mountains or urban terrain that often block traditional radio signals.

At the demonstration, the TACPs and their interagency colleagues practiced the first steps of organizing a disaster response, like setting up communication relays and helicopter landing zones. They stood up the network in just three hours, allowing them to move fast and reduce the risk of accidentally duplicating efforts, such as sending two helicopters to do the same task. Text messaging also reduced the risk of losing something in translation, a common error in voice-to-voice transmissions.

“It’s great if I can key up on a radio and talk to someone, but how many times have we played the telephone game and something’s gotten lost?” Bartels asked.

The responders found they did not need to communicate as often because the Pro X2s doubled as tracking devices that appeared as little blue dots on their smartphone apps. The device works with the Team Awareness Kit, an app used by many service members and government agencies, but it also works with a goTenna app that requires less training to use.

“If I’m working the command-and-control node, now I don’t even have to talk to that guy or gal that’s on the edge,” Bartels said. “I can see their little blue dot and they can shoot me a text message that says ‘Hey, I need a helicopter.’ And they didn’t have to talk to three other people, where something might get lost, to get back to me.”

air force tacp
A tactical air control party member with the 147th Air Support Operations Squadron, 147th Reconnaissance Wing, looks at a map during a full mission profile deployment exercise in Gila Bend, Arizona, April 12, 2016. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by 1st Lt. Alicia Lacy)

The technology could be helpful in situations where cell service is only partially down, but the surviving network is overloaded. Bartels said it took up to six or eight hours just to receive a text message during the February ice storm in Texas that left more than 250,000 people without electricity across the state.

“If I can roll into an area, give this to six or seven different agencies, and build a network for a really low cost, then I’m not clogging up the cell phone networks or the radio networks,” he said. “I can send out one group message, which allows me to say more with less and free up those critical pathways.”

Each Pro X2 costs $1,200, compared to the $5,000 or $10,000 radios Bartels frequently encounters in his line of work. Unlike some of those devices, the Pro X2 can’t stream video or other higher-end capabilities, but it can get responders on the same page faster and requires little training to use, so Airmen could hand them out to partners at the start of a mission and get going.

The small radios could help address a big challenge in disaster response. An after-action report published by the city of Austin after the Texas ice storm found that “different network infrastructures within some partner agencies challenged the exchange of information.” The Army National Guard also identified disparate communications equipment as a challenge delaying emergency response in events like Hurricane Katrina and 9/11. 

The Air Force recognizes that challenge too, which was why its innovation program AFWERX contracted with goTenna in 2022 to develop a low-bandwidth remote situational awareness communications mesh network that could apply to missions both at home and overseas. Ari Schuler, goTenna’s CEO, said his company’s technology has been used in conflict zones such as Iraq, Afghanistan, and Ukraine, where cell phone signals or satellite communications often put users at risk of artillery strikes

Schuler said goTenna’s mesh networks are well-suited for areas where satellites may be disrupted or where jamming is a threat. Though satellite disruption may prevent a goTenna network overseas from connecting to higher headquarters at the Pentagon or elsewhere, it would not interrupt operators in the field. Since it does not stream video, audio, or other high-bandwidth information, the network can use ‘short-burst’ transmissions: lightweight messages that are more difficult to disrupt. It also helps that it can form a mesh network, where no particular node is more important than another.

“If you jam one portion of the mesh, the network’s just going to route around that, so it’s harder to take down the network in its entirety,” Schuler said.

The 147th ASOS is not the only Air Force unit looking to revamp its communication technology. Security Forces Airmen at nuclear missile bases in Wyoming, North Dakota, and Montana, and facility managers at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla. are implementing new networks that reduce the role of voice-to-voice communication in favor of text and map-based information, which should allow for faster and more reliable emergency response. Meanwhile, Gen. Mike Minihan, head of Air Mobility Command, highlighted connectivity as the ‘single best investment’ for improving his troops’ ability to operate across the vast Pacific. 

“When I can understand exactly where the blue [friendly] forces are and exactly where the red forces are, and I don’t have to transmit to understand that lay-down, then mobility will have the ability to, one, operate in a higher-contested environment, and, two, support the joint team so that they can operate in a higher-contested environment,” he told Air & Space Forces Magazine in September.

Schuler hopes the Pro X2’s low price and high interoperability make it an appealing option for operators.

“Making sure that everyone can communicate is critical, and really leads to saving lives,” he said. “It’s a low-cost capability … so you’re able to get more of these in the hands of operators, and the more operators are connecting, the more effective their response is going to be.”

Air Force Test Enterprise Gears Up for the Challenge of CCAs

Air Force Test Enterprise Gears Up for the Challenge of CCAs

Testing Collaborative Combat Aircraft—the unmanned, autonomous aircraft that will fly alongside crewed fighters with the goal of beefing up the future Air Force fleet—will require an unprecedented integration of effort from engineers and operators, leaders of the service’s test enterprise said in a recent interview with Air & Space Forces Magazine.

“We’re still learning” how CCAs will have to be tested, Maj. Gen. Evan C. Dertien, commander of the Air Force Test Center, said. “My focus right now is making sure that the test enterprise is ready to test autonomy.”

“A lot of the work we’re doing is, I’m trying to train the workforce,” Dertien explained. That includes making sure test ranges, policies and procedures are ready and trying to get the various parts of the enterprise to consider, “How would we handle these aircraft when they get here?”

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has said the Air Force plans to build at least 1,000 CCAs, and that they will be available for operational deployment before the end of the decade, leaving just six years to select contractors, develop, build, and test the aircraft. The Air Force has requested $5.8 billion for CCAs over the future years defense plan, covering the next five years.

Collaborative Combat Aircraft would work with manned aircraft such as the F-35, as shown in this artist’s conceptual illustration. Lockheed Martin illustration

Dertien said he has all the experts he needs for testing the drones. The challenge will be integrating their different specialities.

“I have people that know how to do [unmanned aerial vehicles], I have people that know how to do autonomy. I have … people that know how to do fighter tactics,” he said. “But now we’re going to have to bring them all together to test something like the CCA.”

There are several programs in progress right now that will lead into CCA testing, providing huge amounts of data to be analyzed—Skyborg; XQ-58 Valkyrie; the Viper Experimentation and Next-gen Operations Model (VENOM) project, exploring manned-unmanned teaming with a half-dozen F-16s; and the X-62A Variable In-flight Simulation Test Aircraft (VISTA) aircraft, an F-16 modified to explore maneuvering and tactics of autonomous aircraft, able to simulate the behavior of various designs.

“The work we’re doing on VISTA is really helping us advance autonomy and get after the workforce we need,” Dertien said. “The things we’re doing down at Eglin with the XQ-58 and developing the autonomy … is developing that workforce and the data infrastructure, and also pairing it up with fighter aircrew, and starting the basics of fighter integration.”

The VENOM program “will really take that to the next level of autonomy with sensors,” he added. “And all this is, if nothing else, prepping the test enterprise for when that first CCA lands or is brought here; that we’re ready to test the autonomy and integrate it with existing systems like the F-22 and the F-35.”

A Kratos XQ-58A Valkyrie was on display on its launcher at AFA’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference in September. The Valkyrie was developed with the Air Force Research Laboratory as a demonstrator. Mike Tsukamoto/staff

The advent of CCAs is driving a larger change in testing, said Col. Douglas P. Wickert, commander of the 412th Test Wing at Edwards. Until recently, new platforms could be tested individually, but “increasingly, these are all interactive systems.”

A CCA, he pointed out, is “just a node in a wider network. And so, one of the things that we’ve done in the test enterprise is create recurring opportunities to bring a lot of things together.”

By creating what Wickert called a “stage” for CCAs to integrate with other planned Air Force networks like the Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS), the service can “see how CCA is going to play into that and contribute to that.” After that, future programs will start and “we can test them in a in a very complex, realistic environment,” he said.

Dertien said the test enterprise is taking a “crawl walk, run” approach to autonomy and how it can be applied to military systems.

At AFA’s Air, Space and Cyber conference in September, Dertien said the VENOM program will be able to take cues from offboard sensors and establish, “with multiple aircraft … a foundation” for CCA testing. He said his organization is focused on setting “the rule sets and the safety procedures” for those experiments.

Saltzman Announces New Deltas to ‘Streamline Feedback’ Between Operations, Acquisition

Saltzman Announces New Deltas to ‘Streamline Feedback’ Between Operations, Acquisition

A month after revealing prototype “Integrated Mission Deltas” to combine operations and sustainment under one roof, Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Chance Saltzman announced he’s creating corresponding “System Deltas” to further refine the organization.  

The new units are part of Saltzman’s push to align the Space Force around missions rather than functions. In a service-wide ‘C-Note’ sent Oct. 13, Saltzman described the effort as “Forging a Purpose-built Space Service.” 

As with the Integrated Mission Deltas, the Space Force will begin with two prototype System Deltas, one focused on electronic warfare and the other on position, navigation, and timing.  

Just as the mission deltas fall within Space Operations Command, including their own sustainment and upgrade personnel who used to be in Space Systems Command, the new System Deltas also combine personnel from different areas. Focused on developing and acquiring new capabilities and systems, these units will be part of Space Systems Command, Saltzman wrote, but possess close ties with their mission delta counterparts to “streamline the feedback” from operators to acquirers.  

But close ties does not suggest the deltas will be physically co-located. A Space Force spokesperson told Air & Space Forces Magazine that the System Deltas and the Integrated Mission Deltas will instead seek to better coordinate their efforts by eliminated what Saltzman calls “organizational seams.” 

“There are no perfect organizational structures,” Saltzman said at AFA’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference in September. “The structuring of people to do their jobs will always create seams. The key is to arrange the organization to maximize performance around what matters most and minimize the negative integration effects that seams naturally create.” 

Creating System Deltas as a direct counterpart to Integrated Mission Deltas will mitigate the seams between these functions by cutting down on the bureaucratic process by which operations and acquisition personnel typically communicate wants and needs, the spokesperson added. 

The two Integrated Mission Deltas officially stood up Oct. 12, as the electronic warfare sustainment offices moved to Space Delta 3, Space Operations Command’s EW Space Delta. The other new mission delta, focused on position, navigation, and timing, is entirely new, and was built by drawing operators out of Space Delta 8 and sustainers from Space Systems Command. 

The new System Deltas will form “in the coming months,” according to a Space Force release

“Corresponding [System Deltas] will follow, but our initial scope is limited so we can quickly execute, learn, and adapt for broader implementation,” Saltzman wrote in his memo. 

The Integrated Mission Deltas and System Deltas are fully in line with Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall’s objective to reoptimize the department for an era of great power competition. 

“Form follows function and, as Secretary Kendall has said, it is critical that all elements of the DAF be reoptimized for great power competition,” Saltzman wrote in his memo, the latest in a series of C-Notes he has sent to the service outlining his ideas and ambitions for the Space Force. “Our processes must generate the effects our Joint Force needs to successfully implement the [National Defense Strategy] in the face of our pacing threat.” 

F-15s Land in Middle East as Austin Visits Israel and Touts ‘Augmented’ USAF Presence

F-15s Land in Middle East as Austin Visits Israel and Touts ‘Augmented’ USAF Presence

F-15Es arrived in the Middle East on Oct. 13, as the U.S. continued to bolster its forces in the region, the U.S. Air Force announced.

The planes, which deployed from RAF Lakenheath, U.K., are part of a broader package of forces that have been deployed after Hamas’ attack on Israel, including an increased number of A-10 Thunderbolt II close air support aircraft and F-16 Fighting Falcon multirole fighters.

“The aircraft’s advanced systems and targeting capabilities enable U.S. forces to respond to any crisis or contingency, and if necessary, engage and defeat adversaries,” Air Forces Central (AFCENT) said in a statement announcing the arrival of the F-15Es.

The Pentagon did not say where the F-15Es would be based. Their arrival comes one day after the Pentagon announced A-10 Warthogs from the 354th Fighter Squadron at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz., had arrived in the region, in addition to the Warthogs from the 75th Fighter Squadron already in the region.

U.S. officials have said that U.S. Air Force F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters are among the additional capabilities that could be sent

“The U.S. military is committed to the enduring safety and security across the Middle East,” AFCENT commander Lt. Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich said in an Oct. 13 statement. “By posturing advanced fighters and integrating with joint and coalition forces, we are strengthening our partnerships and reinforcing security in the region.”

U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, who arrived in Israel on Oct. 13, met with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant, and the Israel’s newly-formed war cabinet.

Austin highlighted the “bolstered” USAF presence in the Middle East and the deployment of the USS Gerard R. Ford in the Eastern Mediterranean, according to a readout of Austin’s meetings provided by Pentagon Press Secretary Air Force Brig. Gen. Patrick S. Ryder.

Upon returning to the U.S., Austin also dispatched the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower to the region, the Pentagon announced Oct. 14.

The new U.S. assets are aimed at discouraging Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group, Iran, or other groups from trying to escalate the conflict and to show support for Israel, which has had more than 1,300 citizens killed and others taken hostage and brought to Gaza. American citizens are among the dead and taken hostage by Hamas, the U.S. government says. The State Department has announced plans to evacuate some American citizens from Israel.

“We’ve augmented U.S. fighter aircraft squadrons in the Middle East, and the U.S. Department of Defense stands fully ready to deploy additional assets, if necessary,” Austin said during a press conference in Israel on Oct. 13.

In addition to the Air Force fighters, the USS Ford also carries four F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter squadrons, as well as electronic warfare and command and control aircraft. The carrier is also accompanied by cruise missile-carrying warships.

Ryder added that the U.S. was “expediting security assistance to Israel, including precision guided munitions and air defense ammunition.” Austin also “committed to deploying additional assets as needed.” U.S. officials have said that U.S. Air Force F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters are among the further capabilities that could be sent.

Some of the additional assets Austin referenced are on their way.

The USS Dwight D. Eisenhower aircraft carrier was set to sail from Norfolk, Va., on Oct. 13, but its deployment was temporarily delayed, according to local media reports. The next day, the Pentagon said the Eisenhower and its accompanying warships would join the Ford in the Eastern Mediterranean. Embarked aboard the Eisenhower is Carrier Air Wing 3, which typically has four fighter squadrons as well as other aircraft. The Pentagon said the Eisenhower would be carrying nine aircraft squadrons of various types on its new deployment. Like the Ford, it is joined by multiple cruise missile-carrying warships.

In a statement issued on Oct. 14, Austin said the deployment of the Eisenhower to the Eastern Mediterranean was part of the U.S. effort to “deter hostile actions against Israel or any efforts toward widening this war.”

Israel has responded to the Hamas attacks with punishing airstrikes in Gaza, and Israeli ground forces appears posed to intervene, with large numbers of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) staging near Israel’s border with Gaza and issuing warnings to evacuate. Netanyahu has vowed to “crush and destroy” Hamas.

During his visit, Austin signaled strong support for Israel.

“This is no time for neutrality, or for false equivalence, or for excuses for the inexcusable,” Austin said at an Oct. 13 press conference. “Make no mistake: the United States will make sure that Israel has what it needs to defend itself, and Israel has a right to protect its people.”

Amid Wars in Ukraine and Israel, ‘Long-Planned’ B-1 Task Force Deploys to UK

Amid Wars in Ukraine and Israel, ‘Long-Planned’ B-1 Task Force Deploys to UK

Multiple B-1B Lancers arrived at RAF Fairford, United Kingdom, on Oct. 12, kicking off a Bomber Task Force deployment as tensions rise across the globe. 

More than 100 Airmen deployed to support the B-1s from Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, the first Bomber Task Force rotation of fiscal 2024. U.S. Air Forces in Europe emphasized in a release that the deployment was “long-planned,” and was not triggered by events such as Hamas’ incursion into Israel and events since.

USAFE “routinely hosts and supports a variety of U.S. Air Force aircraft and units for training aligned with U.S. European Command objectives,” the statement said. 

Still, the bombers’ arrival and its missions over the next several months will likely be watched closely. As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine drags on, fears rise that the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza could spread to other groups and countries in the Middle East. 

B-1s from an earlier Bomber Task Force deployment fired advanced munitions in a live-fire exercise in June, using ranges in Jordan and Saudi Arabia as part of a joint exercise that included Israel. 

During that same deployment Russian fighter jets intercepted the B-1s in the Baltic Sea region. The task force’s bombers landed in Sweden for the first time ever and joined in on the Swedes’ premier air exercise in the Arctic. 

Tensions have only risen since then. In the wake of Hamas’ attack, multiple USAF fighter squadrons deployed to the Middle East in an effort to deter both Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group, and Iran from expanding the conflict while showing firm support for Israel.

Separately, the Ukraine Defense Contact Group also met this week to discuss the country’s long-term air defense, even as questions persist about the U.S.’s ability to keep providing aid. 

Amid all this, the B-1 Lancers’ deployment “provides U.S. and NATO leaders with strategic options to assure Allies and partners, while also deterring potential adversary aggression throughout Europe and across the globe,” according to a USAFE release. 

Officials have touted Bomber Task Forces as a flexible way for the Air Force to reassure allies and project airpower around the world.  

“It seems as though everyone likes to have a bomber in their region,” Air Force Gen. Anthony J. Cotton told reporters this August. 

Space Force Pumps the Brakes on ChatGPT-Like Technology With Temporary Ban

Space Force Pumps the Brakes on ChatGPT-Like Technology With Temporary Ban

Space Force Guardians face a temporary ban on using generative artificial intelligence tools and large language models (LLM) for official purposes.

The move, first reported by Bloomberg, was announced in a Sept. 29 memo from Lisa Costa, the Space Force’s Chief Technology and Innovation Officer.

According to the memo, obtained by Air & Space Forces Magazine, Guardians are forbidden from using government data in generative AI solutions unless they receive official approval.

IBM describes Generative AI as programs “that can generate high-quality text, images, and other content based on the data they were trained on”—platforms such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Ask Sage, a model designed for government work by the Department of the Air Force’s former chief software officer Nicolas M. Chaillan.

ChatGPT logo on a keybaord. Mike Tsukamoto/staff; GuHyeok Jeong/Pixabay

In an interview with Air & Space Forces Magazine, Chaillan argued against the Space Force’s move, citing concerns about the efficacy of prohibiting an entire technology or platform and the potential risks linked to personnel accessing these platforms on their personal devices.

“When people are banned from using government equipment and you’re banned from using your device (to access these platforms), it’s going to push people to use their personal device. People have created personal accounts on the platform, which creates more risk. All you’re doing when you do things like this, is the creation of more shadow IT and more cyber risk,” Chaillan said.

According to Chaillan, Ask Sage was developed on government clouds and constructed to fulfill all cybersecurity prerequisites. He said over the past six months, roughly 500 Guardians utilized the platform, with no reported security incidents. He also said there are presently 10,000 Ask Sage users throughout the Department of Defense.

A Pentagon spokesperson said they were unable to verify the exact number of Ask Sage users, but in a statement, they echoed many of the same concerns Costa referenced in her memo.

“LLMs offer great promise to assist DOD personnel in accomplishing a wide variety of tasks, however we must ensure that sensitive DOD data is safeguarded when using such platforms,” the spokesperson said via email. “Valid concerns have also been voiced about the traceability and validity of answers provided by LLMs.”

Space Force spokesperson Maj. Tanya Downsworth told Air & Space Forces Magazine that Costa’s memo institutes a “temporary, strategic pause to evaluate the best path forward to align this capability into the USSF mission that protects the data of our service and Guardians.”

She added that the service will be looking at risk management methods and encourage pilot programs to gather data to inform decisions.

Chaillan, however, argued any delay with such a rapidly evolving technology means risking losing ground against the likes of China. Beijing has expressed aspirations to take the lead in harnessing the power of generative artificial intelligence across a spectrum of military applications to reshape the future of warfare.

When ChatGPT first gained popularity earlier this year, defense officials all the way up to Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall suggested the technology may have myriad uses, from acquisition to mission planning.

But the Space Force’s decision tempers some of that excitement. For his part, Chaillan suggested the possibility of the DOD considering the development of their own technology utilizing generative AI and LLM.

“(It) makes me wonder if they’re thinking of building their own stuff, which is going to be massive taxpayers’ spending,” he said. Chaillan quit his Air Force job in 2021, citing the lack of funding for crucial technologies in the joint all-domain command and control (JADC2) as the tipping point for his resignation.

So far, there has been no public discussions by Pentagon officials about building their own GenAI/LLM model. However, in August, the DOD announced the establishment of Task Force Lima, led by the DOD’s Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office. This task force is dedicated to advancing national security through GenAI in diverse areas of defense.

Costa’s memo highlighted her office’s participation in Task Force Lima, with a shared objective to “responsibly and strategically utilize the capabilities of GenAI and LLMs.”

Costa also expressed confidence in the long-term utility of the technology, writing that Gen AI will “undoubtedly revolutionize our workforce and enhance Guardians’ ability to operate at speed.”

Regarding the duration of the ban, Downsworth said the CTIO intends to accelerate the formulation and issuance of specific USSF guidance, possibly within 30 days of the memo’s publication.