Space Force Plans 21 National Security Launches in 2024

Space Force Plans 21 National Security Launches in 2024

The Space Force aims to boost its National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program from 12 launches in fiscal 2023 to 21 missions in 2024, with United Launch Alliance (ULA) responsible for 11 missions and SpaceX handling 10.

Nailing down all the contracting will come in phases, however, as the 2024 budget has yet to pass Congress and be signed into law. Fiscal 2024 began on Oct. 1, but the government is operating under a continuing resolution as lawmakers wrangle over differences.

“The government is only ordering eight missions now, due to continuing resolution,” said Col. Doug Pentecost, deputy program executive officer for Space Systems Command’s Assured Access to Space (SSC/AATS).

If the full program is executed, the launches and associated activities will pay $1.30 billion to ULA and $1.23 billion to SpaceX, Pentecost said.

SDA Launch
A SpaceX Falcon 9 launched the Space Development Agency’s Tranche 0 mission into low-Earth orbit from Vandenberg Space Force Base, Calif., in April. U.S. Space Force photo by Senior Airman Rocio Romo

Pentecost said the Space Force initially planned more ULA launches, but after evaluating readiness, production capacity, and the ability to meet demands, the split was adjusted. Over the entire 48 planned launches in the National Security Space Launch Phase 2 plan, ULA is now expected to be responsible for 26 launch assignments versus 22 for SpaceX. In all, Phase 2 will be substantially larger than the original estimate of 34 launches.

The 48 planned launches, to be executed within the next two to three years, encompass missions ranging from GPS to missile warning and space research and reconnaissance, according to SSC’s announcement.

ULA and SpaceX secured their contract for Phase 2 in August 2020, outperforming competitors including Northrop Grumman and Blue Origin. After this fifth and final Phase 2 award, the launch program will again be open to competition for Phase 3, which will cover the period from 2025 to 2034. That program is to be split into two segments, or “lanes.”

In Lane 1, SSC will award multiple indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts. These five-year, renewable agreements are intended to increase the Space Force’s launch options and, through competition, to drive down costs. In Lane 2, USSF will award two contractors launch agreements to manage launches into all orbits with comprehensive mission-specific services.

Fiscal 2024 Launches

Launch VendorProgramMission
United Launch AllianceSDA T2TL-BOne of the Tranche 2 Transport Layer launches for the Space Development Agency (SDA)
NROL-73, -56, -100, -109Reconnaissance and intelligence missions conducted in partnership with the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)
STP-5Supports SSC’s Space Test Program
SILENTBARKER 2 / NROL-118Joint NRO and SSC space domain awareness mission
USSF-57Next Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared GEO (NGG) satellites for survivable missile warning, tracking, and defense
USSF-25Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA) DRACO to demonstrate a nuclear thermal rocket in orbit.
USSF-95Missile Track Custody (MTC) prototype satellite to evaluate future requirements
GPS III-9Part of GPS modernization
SpaceXSDA T1TL-F, SDA T1TR-A, SDA T1TR-ETranche 1 of SDA’s planned Transport Layer for global military data connectivity
SDA T2TL-A, SDA T2TL-CFirst three Tranche 2 satellites in SDA’s Transport Layer
USSF-75, USSF-70Undisclosed Space Force missions
NROL-77A reconnaissance and intelligence mission in partnership with NRO
GPS IIIF-1First launch in GPS III Follow-on program
GPS III-10GPS Modernization

Inside the Air Force’s Newest SOF Career: Special Reconnaissance

Inside the Air Force’s Newest SOF Career: Special Reconnaissance

Editor’s Note: This is the first of three-part series on Air Force Special Reconnaissance. The second story can be found here, and the third can be found here.

FORT LIBERTY, N.C.— In most professions, the path of least resistance is the best, but the opposite is often true for the Air Force’s newest special warfare field: special reconnaissance (SR).

“Going through sniper school, you try to walk through the worst terrain that you can find because that’s where nobody else wants to go,” said Tech Sgt. J, an SR Airman whose full name was withheld for security reasons. “Vines and sticks grabbing onto your ghillie suit … it can be a pretty humbling experience.

Sneaking through swamps is one of many key skills in SR, where the goal is to provide timely and accurate intelligence needed to apply airpower. They are trained on the full range of reconnaissance tools, from crawling in a ghillie suit and peering through a sniper scope to flying small drones to using other equipment to gather intelligence through cyberspace and electronic warfare.

“All the other sister services have their own reconnaissance assets,” J said. “The Air Force was looking at a more niche capability, specifically for what kind of problems pilots are going to have.”

special tactics
A U.S. Air Force Special Tactics operator from the 24th Special Operations Wing provides security for an MC-130J Commando II transport during a training exercise June 17, 2021, at Melrose Air Force Range, New Mexico. U.S. Air Force photo by Staff. Sgt Ridge Shan

SR first emerged in 2019 as the replacement for special operations weather teams (SOWT), which gathered weather and environmental intelligence in hostile territory. In the years before that shift, SOWT Airmen started adopting some of the skills that make up the core of SR today. Though SR training still includes some weather elements, the main purpose of the field is to conduct air-minded reconnaissance as the Air Force and the wider U.S. military prepare for a possible conflict against a near-peer adversary like China.

“Basically we are looking at solving the integrated air defense problem that China, Russia, or Iran is going to have,” J said. “We’d be looking at opening airways for follow-on forces. The Air Force doesn’t want to have to rely on Army assets to open up those airways.”

In a future conflict, SR Airmen may find themselves observing enemy anti-air defenses, gathering intelligence on enemy troop movements, conducting real-time battle damage assessments after an airstrike, or scouting aircraft landing zones. Satellites or aerial reconnaissance may be unavailable, which is why SR Airmen are trained in the old-school method of crawling through the bush.

“We weren’t doing that in Afghanistan because there was no reason to accept that risk—we could just put an MQ-9 over the target for a week,” said Capt. Max Krasnov, a special tactics officer and training flight commander with the 352nd Special Warfare Training Squadron at Pope Army Airfield, N.C. SR “ensures that the Air Force has a way to get the ground truth under any situation. That’s why they are trained to the full gamut of reconnaissance techniques that are currently available.”

In terms of cyber and electronic warfare, J said his career field serves as “the link between the big computers and the target,” but he could not share specific capabilities due to security concerns. Krasnov offered a watered-down version of what cyber reconnaissance might look like.

“If I were to walk into a hotel lobby, log onto the guest Wi-Fi on my cell phone, and get the IP address that my phone connected to, I am gathering information about that hotel,” he said. “Play with your imagination as to where that can go.”

Trainees from the 352nd Special Warfare Training Squadron conduct a simulated ambush during small unit tactics training on Mackall Army Airfield, North Carolina, Oct. 24, 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Capt. Xiaofan Liu

The wide range of skill sets involved in SR mean there are plenty of rabbit holes for Airmen to dive down.

“What I think is a cool thing about the career field is there are certain vectors that guys can really nerd out about,” J said. “Maybe a dude just really wants to deep dive into drones, you can do that. Guys want to go cyber warfare or higher-level intelligence gathering, we have avenues for that.”

Only 50 SR Airmen currently exist, though the Air Force hopes to grow that number to over 100. One of those could soon be Airman 1st Class S, a trainee in the SR Apprentice Course at Pope. While SR does not have the decades of lore enjoyed by other special warfare fields, such as combat control or pararescue, that was part of the attraction for S, whose full name was withheld.

“It was new and there are only a few people doing it … so I was curious to see what it was like,” he said.

Other service members feel the same way, including at least three prior Marines and a prior Green Beret.

“There has actually been, in my opinion, a surprising amount of cross-trainees or prior service people coming through,” said J, who listed long-range-shooting and cyber warfare as two reasons why some of them sought out SR.

Being so new, SR Airmen often have to explain what they do when they arrive downrange, but J considers that a strength rather than a weakness.

“I honestly think that it is a benefit for the kind of people we attract, because then they are forced to go out and prove themselves and their capabilities,” said the former SOWT.

J spoke from experience, having been attached to a team of Green Berets in Afghanistan a few years ago.

“I showed up and I said, ‘Hey, this is my little drone, this is what I can provide for you guys. I’ve got this training up into this shooting school, I’m a jumpmaster, I can do all this,’” he said. “And then the next step is to go to the range of that team and out-shoot them.”

USAF’s New Chief: Allvin Confirmed as Air Force’s 23rd Chief of Staff

USAF’s New Chief: Allvin Confirmed as Air Force’s 23rd Chief of Staff

The Senate confirmed Gen. David W. Allvin as the Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force on Nov. 2, elevating him from the acting role he has held since Oct. 1.  

He was soon en route to a brief ceremony to be sworn in as the 23rd Chief of Staff at the same location he took his commissioning oath 37 years ago–Falcon Stadium at the Air Force Academy campus in Colorado Springs, Colo., where he was attending Corona, a conference of senior Air Force leaders.

A career mobility and test pilot, Allvin became Vice Chief of Staff in November 2020, just months after Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. became the service’s 22nd Chief. When Brown moved up to become Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Oct. 1, Allvin became acting chief while waiting for his nomination to be confirmed by the Senate.

“He has guided many of our most important initiatives to improve the Air Force—including recruiting and operations,” Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall said in a statement.

Allvin is only the second Chief to have been neither a fighter nor bomber pilot; the only other was Gen. Norton A. Schwartz, CSAF No. 19, who spent much of his career in the Special Operations world. Allvin has extensive operational and staff background and commanded at the squadron, wing, and operations center levels. He spent much of the past decade in the Pentagon either on the Air Staff or Joint Staff. 

“It is truly an honor to be confirmed as the 23rd Chief of Staff of the Air Force,” Allvin said in a statement. “In today’s dynamic environment, our service faces both significant challenges and tremendous opportunities—the world’s greatest Air Force will meet them head-on just as innovative Airmen have done for generations.”

“My wife, Gina, and I are humbled by this opportunity, and we are eager to continue to serve our Air Force, our Airmen, and their families,” he added. “We are grateful for the stellar examples set by General C.Q. Brown Jr., and his wife, Sharene. Gina and I look forward to continuing to serve with them in our new roles.”

Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David W. Allvin is sworn in as the Air Force’s 23rd Chief of Staff at Falcon Stadium, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colo., Nov. 2, 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Andy Morataya

As an Air Staff leader, Allvin was a visionary who helped to craft the joint force operating concepts advanced by three successive chiefs: Gen. Mark Welsh, No. 20; Gen. David Goldfein, No. 21; and Brown, No. 22. He helped write “America’s Air Force: A Call to the Future” in 2014 and the “Air Force Future Operating Concept” in 2015, both critical precursors to what would become Goldfein’s vision for multi-domain operations and, ultimately, what is now known throughout the services as Joint All-Domain Command and Control.  

More recently, he has been a leading voice tackling the service’s challenges with recruiting and retention, acting as a champion for the Barriers to Service Cross-Functional Team.

Allvin’s accession to CSAF drew praise from Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Chance Saltzman.

“The dynamic challenges we all face will require strategic thinking like General Allvin’s to overcome, and I consider the Space Force fortunate to have him as a teammate,” Saltzman said in a statement. 

Allvin was approved by the Senate in 95-1 vote. The lone dissent came from Sen. Roger Marshall (R.-Kan.).

Allvin’s nomination had been hung up in the chamber for months due to a political standoff that began on March 8, when Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) placed a hold on all general and flag officer nominations and blocking the Senate from approving those nominations en masse, by voice vote. Tuberville placed his hold in protest of a Pentagon policy that provides paid leave and travel funds for troops and family members seeking reproductive services, such as abortions, that are not available where they are based. Tuberville contends the policy violates federal funding law commonly referred to as the Hyde Amendment, which bars the use of federal funds for abortions.

Under Senate rules, Senators may place such holds on individuals or groups. The Senate can force votes on individual nominees, but Senate Democrats, who hold the majority, have declined to do so for months, arguing giving in to Tuberville in this way would burn up too much floor time. The number of general officer nominations affected has grown steadily and now numbers more than 370.  

In September, Tuberville tried to force an individual vote on Gen. Eric Smith to be the next Commandant of the Marine Corps in an unusual procedural motion. Senate Majority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) responded by calling up the nominations for Brown, Smith, and Gen. Randy George, to be the next Chief of Staff of the Army, for individual votes. 

A similar process unfolded in recent weeks, as Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) said he would try to use the same procedural motion to force votes on Allvin and Adm. Lisa Franchetti, nominated to be the next Chief of Naval Operations.

The moves gained added urgency after Smith, having been confirmed as Commandant but still without a No. 2, suffered a medical emergency and was hospitalized Oct. 30. That left the Marine Corps with a three-star acting leader. Along with Allvin, the Senate confirmed another service head in Franchetti, also in a 95-1 vote, and Lt. Gen. Christopher Mahoney as Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps, who will temporarily head the USMC in Smith’s absence as the service’s newest four-star general.

“They are outstanding leaders who have faithfully served their country for decades, and I know they will continue to be great leaders of our force as they continue to tackle the crucial national security issues of these challenging times,” Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III said.

Others also joined in the praise.

“The long wait for Gen. Allvin to be confirmed is thankfully over, and now the Air Force can get on with its important modernization and readiness initiatives,” said Bernie Skoch, Chair of the Air & Space Forces Association. “Gen. Allvin is a gifted senior leader whose operational, staff, and test experience make him ideally suited to build on the outstanding work of his predecessor. The unprecedented global threats facing our military today pose challenges for which airpower is, in many cases, the only answer and most effective deterrent. His leadership will be crucial in the years ahead.”

With Allvin’s confirmation, however, the Air Force now has no Vice Chief of Staff. Deputy chief of staff for operations Lt. Gen. James C. “Jim” Slife has been nominated to succeed Allvin as Vice Chief, but his nomination is among those on hold. An Air Force spokesperson confirmed to Air & Space Forces Magazine that there will be no acting VCSAF; Allvin, like Smith, will functionally as both Chief and Vice Chief until Slife can be confirmed.  

A resolution may be coming for those nominees, some of whom have been stuck in limbo for more than six months. Sens. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) have worked on a “standing order resolution”—short of a rule change, it would allow the Senate to vote on military nominations in blocs until the end of 2024, with exceptions for members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or leaders of combatant commands. Schumer said Nov. 1 that he would bring the resolution, which has been sent to the Rules Committee, up for a vote in the near future. It would require 60 votes for passage. 

“While today’s vote is a step forward, we continue to urge the Senate to take swift action on the remaining nominations so that these American heroes can lead our team in keeping our country safe,” Austin said.

Air Force Plans RFP for New Tanker in Fiscal 2025, But Is Still Building Its Acquisition Strategy

Air Force Plans RFP for New Tanker in Fiscal 2025, But Is Still Building Its Acquisition Strategy

The Air Force aims to release a request for proposals for the KC-135 Recapitalization Program—formerly called the “bridge tanker”—in fiscal 2025 but has yet to set an acquisition strategy for the aircraft, waiting for more industry input, a service spokesperson said.

Service officials have previously forecast an acquisition strategy to be ready by mid-2024.

Responding to queries about the future of competition on the tanker recapitalization program, from which Lockheed Martin withdrew its LMXT offering last month, the Air Force said it is “looking forward to reviewing industry responses to the Tanker Recapitalization Program RFI” or Request For Information, responses to which were due last month.

The service is “committed to completing the ongoing market research before determining its acquisition strategy and remains committed to delivering the best tanker to the warfighter at the best value,” the spokesperson said.

The service did not say whether it plans a competition, and service leaders including Secretary Frank Kendall have questioned whether a competition would be worth the expense and delay involved. The alternative would likely be to buy more upgraded versions of the KC-46 Pegasus.

Some members of Congress have expressed unhappiness with the idea of skipping a competition given the KC-46’s struggles. Thus far, however, they have failed to pass any legislation mandating a new tanker contest.

Air Force acquisition executive Andrew Hunter has said that a tanker analysis of alternatives was to get underway this fall, based in part on the results of the RFI.

The KC-135 Recapitalization Program seeks to maintain an unbroken chain of aerial tanker production between the end of the KC-46 contract, circa 2029, and the initial operating capability of the Next Generation Air-refueling System (NGAS), a smaller, stealthy tanker that will accompany combat aircraft into contested airspace. The NGAS is still being defined.

Lockheed had pitched its LMXT, based on the Airbus A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport, as a “mothership” for these small stealth tankers, as it has much larger fuel capacity than the Boeing KC-46 now in production.    

After Lockheed’s exit, its partner Airbus said it would still seek to compete for the program. But in its response to query from Air & Space Forces Magazine, the Air Force spokesperson was cagey about whether the service would accept a foreign offer, saying it is “interested in delivering the best tanker to the warfighter and will adhere to all statutory and regulatory provisions for the Tanker Recapitalization strategy.”

In its last two swings at selling its Multi Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) to the Air Force, Airbus was partnered with a U.S. prime contractor and pledged significant U.S. content and final assembly in the U.S. Its deal with Lockheed for LMXT called for major work to be done in Lockheed’s Marietta, Ga. facilities and in Alabama. The company has not yet discussed how it will pursue the bridge tanker without Lockheed.

“Buy American” laws mandate that certain percentages of content and labor be sourced/performed in the U.S., but content rules vary depending on the type of product.

The Air Force also said it is willing to look at a larger number of aircraft it might buy under the bridge tanker program. While the service has recently said it is expecting the program to include about 75 aircraft—five years of production at an annual rate of 15 aircraft—the service said it “will be flexible” in thinking about how many to buy.

“The Air Force’s goal is to use Tanker Recapitalization to replace 15 KC-135s per year as they retire,” the spokesperson said. “The number of air refuelable, commercial derivative tankers procured to replace KC-135s will be flexible and dependent on Next Generation Air-refueling System (NGAS) first delivery. Tanker Recapitalization deliveries are envisioned to be a minimum of five years to address the gap between KC-46A and an accelerated NGAS.”

To gain flexibility, the spokesperson said, the Air Force said in its request for information that it will look at “up to 140 aircraft,” in case the NGAS doesn’t arrive at the expected time.

Lockheed, in discussing its potential LMXT proposal, said that at 75 aircraft, it could not close the business case to justify a bid, and company officials said they expected the Air Force would wind up buying a minimum of 110-150 aircraft. However, service leaders have also said that if the NGAS moves faster than expected, that the bridge tanker would be curtailed and those resources applied to NGAS, which will have a more advanced and survivable design.

Kendall has said the threat from Chinese long-range missiles “doesn’t allow” the Air Force to go much further with tube-and-wing aircraft adapted from commercial airliners or freighters. Instead, the service is interested in a stealthy aircraft of an all-new design.

The most recent RFI for the KC-135 Recapitalization Program was released in September and is a “controlled” document, meaning its details can’t be released. But a 2021 version of the RFI did call for 140-160 bridge tankers to be bought, starting in 2029, to ensure an unbroken chain of tanker production.

The “tanker recapitalization” refers to replacing the remainder of KC-135s, most of which date back to the Eisenhower Administration, but which have been structurally extended and once re-engined over the last 60 years.

Besides Boeing’s KC-46 and Airbus’ MRTT, there are no large aerial tankers now in production or planned. Lockheed has a smaller KC-130 tanker it builds for the Marine Corps, but the Air Force has indicated it wants an aircraft with greater capacity. The Air Force has said it will consider contracting for tanker services as part of its overall tanker enterprise, but has generally been cool to the idea.  

Meet the Air Force Squadron Preparing PJs for Near-Peer Conflict

Meet the Air Force Squadron Preparing PJs for Near-Peer Conflict

In a recent exercise off the coast of San Diego, Calif., Air Force Pararescuemen (PJs) practiced caring for injured patients amid missile strikes, maritime contested airspace, limited supplies, and other challenges meant to simulate what they may face in a war against a near-peer adversary like China in the Pacific. 

The three-day exercise, which involved parachute jumps, air-dropped Zodiac boats, U.S. Navy helicopters, resupply airdrops, and patients with bloody make-up, was even more impressive considering that it was put together by a squadron located 400 miles away at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz.

“The Combat Leader Course is a seven-week course of instruction that is a hybrid between a leadership course and simulated exercise,” Master Sgt. Trevor Runyan, the Instructor Flight Chief at the 68th Rescue Squadron, a Formal Training Unit (FTU) for PJs, told Air & Space Forces Magazine. 

“That’s one thing that’s extremely unique about us as an FTU,” he added. “While there are organizations trying to innovate these concepts, we are actively employing them.”

air force pjs
U.S. Air Force Combat Leader Course instructors and support staff, assigned to the 68th Rescue Squadron, watch as CLC students parachute into the ocean off the coast of San Diego, Calif., Sept. 5, 2023. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Devlin Bishop)

‘Grind and give it everything’

It takes nearly two years to train a PJ, but even when they finish their last day of the Pararescue Apprentice Course at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., a new maroon beret recipient has one more stop before arriving at an operational squadron: the 68th RQS. Dubbed the ‘Guardian Angel FTU,’ the squadron hosts a two-month Combat Team Member Course that brings new PJs through Mission Qualification Training required for deployments and a majority of the Journeyman skill level (a.k.a. ‘5 level’).

Before the 68 RQS stood up in 2014, PJ squadrons around the world each ran internal training, duplicating effort, Runyan said. The FTU fixes that problem, but it takes work.

“The 68 RQS is relied upon as one of the only hubs for the entire career field,” he said. “With that, we get a lot of pressure and demand.”

Besides the Combat Team Member Course, the squadron also runs the Air Force’s only Military Freefall Jumpmaster Course, and the Combat Leader Course (CLC), where PJs with about 6-10 years of experience attend to become PJ team leaders. Just four instructors are dedicated to teaching the CLC, which currently prepares leaders for operating in an INDOPACOM environment. This means organizing complex exercises like the one off the coast of San Diego. 

“The culture here has been to grind and give it everything you have,” Runyan said. “The challenge with CLC is balancing planning, logistics, running operations and providing instruction to the students. We can always use more resources and manning to provide the highest level of instruction to the students.”

Targeted

The Air Force as a whole is embracing a strategy called Agile Combat Employment, where Airmen proactively and reactively maneuver for both strategic and tactical advantage. This can mean operating from small airfields on islands across the Pacific, a major change from the sprawling air bases in Iraq and Afghanistan during the Global War on Terror. 

To practice agility, the 68 RQS sent CLC students from the simulated ‘main operating base’ at Davis-Monthan to a forward operating site (FOS) near San Diego on short notice with deliberate limitations placed on equipment and personnel. The PJs parachuted into the Pacific with Zodiac boats and boarded a small ship that had been hit by a simulated missile. Once aboard, the PJs provided prolonged field care to the patients aboard.

“It is a priority to practice prolonged field care following a mass casualty in a near-peer conflict,” Runyan said. “We train to conserve resources in order to limit our logistical footprint and improve patient outcome, especially when casualty evacuation is not readily accessible.”

U.S. Airmen, training with the 68th Rescue Squadron, hoist a simulated casualty near San Diego, Calif., Sept. 6, 2023. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class William Finn)

Every detail of the operation requires extensive planning. Freefall parachutes deteriorate if left in salt water too long, so the CLC instructors formed a plan for recovering them, transporting them to San Diego, and driving them back to Davis-Monthan to be rinsed and hung in a drying tower within 48 hours.

“In a real-world mission, you would sink the chutes,” Runyan said. “But losing 10 rigs in a training environment would cost the unit about $300,000.”

Each parachute weighed about 200 pounds when filled with salt water, so the team needed a rope system just to hoist the sodden material onto shoreside loading docks. Besides the parachutes, the squadron also had to move food and equipment for about 50 people (40 support staff and 10 students) out to San Clemente Island, located off the coast of San Diego, for the exercise.

While complicated, the ship rescue drill was just the start of the CLC’s time at San Clemente Island. The course’s culminating exercise kicked off Sept. 17 with a simulated missile strike on the students’ position near the island’s airfield. The students had five minutes to scramble and find shelter, then had to search for survivors in a mock town used for urban warfare training on the island. It was another mass casualty event, with about two dozen patients in need of treatment. The students dealt with collapsed structures, fires, and attacks by simulated opposition forces.

“This simulates one of the most likely mission sets we could respond to: mass casualties caused by a missile strike at a forward operating site,” Runyan said.

air force pjs
A U.S. Airman, training with the 68th Rescue Squadron, takes notes on simulated casualties, Sept. 17, 2023. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class William Finn V)

Joint Integration

Since the airfield had been targeted, the students boarded helicopters to move their patients to safety at another island, or, in this case, a cluster of shipping containers halfway down San Clemente that was simulated as a separate island. Once they arrived at the contingency location, the students continued to care for their patients while arranging for a resupply airdrop and planning for their next mission: rescuing multiple isolated personnel in a contested maritime environment.

“As a 10-man element, they must prioritize missions and determine if and when they should operate as a split team, and the risks associated with that,” Runyan said.

Joint operations were key, as two MH-60 Sea Hawks from the Navy’s Helicopter Sea Combat-23 (HSC-23) squadron flew out to San Clemente for two nights to rescue simulated downed pilots out of the water, while a third helicopter ran resupply missions.

“It is extremely beneficial for the students to integrate with joint DOD assets such as HSC-23,” Runyan said. “Integration between the PJs, HSC-23 crews and maintainers in an austere environment provided invaluable training for all involved.”

Some of the downed pilots were mannequins, while most were live role players. The PJs received the last known location of the downed pilots, then had to track their location 12 hours later by calculating tides, current, and wind speed. The PJs found that a few pilots had drifted into uncontested airspace within range of a helicopter, but most were still within contested airspace, where helicopters could not fly without risk of being shot down.

air force pjs
U.S. Airmen, training with the 68th Rescue Squadron, rescue a simulated casualty from beneath a car Sept. 17, 2023. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class William Finn V)

To reach those pilots, the PJs had to jump out of fixed-wing aircraft with parachute-configured Zodiac boats to enter contested airspace. One at a time, they found the pilots and ferried them back to uncontested waters, where they were rescued by helicopter or rendezvoused with a blue force maritime vessel. The helicopters flew them back to the contingency location on San Clemente Island, where the PJs administered prolonged field care until the helicopters could fly patients to an airfield for fixed-wing evacuation.

The Puck

New technology helped make the exercise much more realistic. In the past, when operating in areas without cell service such as San Clemente Island, instructors might pass information over a radio or give them verbal injects. But at this exercise, the instructors and students carried small, puck-shaped devices that let them share texts, location, and other information through their smartphones.

Made by Somewear Labs, the pucks used the Iridium satellite constellation to send short bursts of data, which are more difficult for adversaries to jam or listen in on. The tech meant exercise participants could immediately communicate and visualize each other’s locations, which made command and control on the remote island much easier. 

air force pjs
U.S. Airmen, training with the 68th Rescue Squadron, rescue a simulated casualty off the coast of Calif., Sept. 12, 2023. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class William Finn V)

“All communication was sent with either the Somewear pucks or through HF radio,” Runyan said. “It let the students exercise decentralized command, enabling them to act on mission-type orders and execute on commander’s intent and previously agreed upon risk acceptance.”

The pucks also put the ‘search’ back in ‘search and rescue.’ Usually during ocean drills, instructors hover near simulated downed pilots in a large safety boat, which keeps the exercise safe for human role players but also makes the survivor easier for students to spot. At this exercise, the instructors still stayed close for human role players, but they also sent mannequins adrift in one-man life rafts, using the Somewear pucks to keep track of the ‘pilots’ even when they were out of sight.

It was a massive effort to plan, but the culminating exercise for the CLC involved realistic scenarios that many Air Force officials anticipate in a near-peer conflict. Now for the 68 RQS, it’s back to the drawing board for the next class.

Air Force Terminates ICBM During Test Launch Due To Anomaly

Air Force Terminates ICBM During Test Launch Due To Anomaly

An unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile flying over the Pacific Ocean was effectively terminated by Space Launch Delta 30 on Nov. 1.

The termination occurred at 12:06 a.m. Pacific Time, due to an unexpected anomaly that emerged during the test launch at Vandenberg Space Force Base, Calif.

An anomaly refers to any unanticipated event during the test, and could stem from various factors associated with the operational platform or the test equipment, Air Force Global Strike Command stated in a release, noting that the test produced valuable data before the termination.

A spokesperson at AFGSC told Air & Space Forces Magazine that more MM III test launches will be held next year, as Vandenberg is the sole Space Force Base that conducts such ICBM tests in the U.S.

An investigation to pinpoint the cause is being assembled by organizations including AFGSC, the 377th Test and Evaluation Group, the 576th Flight Test Squadron, Space Launch Delta 30 Safety Office, and the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center.

Vital data will be gathered through the analysis to correct any errors with the weapon system to guarantee the sustained reliability and precision of the MM III, the release added.

The inception of the Minuteman weapon system dates back to the late 1950s, with the deployment of Minuteman I in the early 1960s.

The LGM -30 Minuteman III has been operational since 1970, characterized by an enhanced range, rapid retargeting features, and the capacity to deliver up to three reentry vehicles to multiple targets with exceptional precision.

The 400 MM III currently in service across the continental U.S. are expected to be replaced with the LGM-35 Sentinel, formerly known as the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD).

In September, Pentagon acquisition chief William LaPlante said the Air Force is speeding up tasks in the Sentinel project to meet the crucial initial operational capability date of September 2030.

Following that, the Air Force announced its $996 million contract with Lockheed Martin to produce the MK21A reentry vehicle for the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile by 2039.

The incoming Sentinel ICBM, designed to be easier to maintain than the MM III, allows easy upgrades as technology develops between now and 2075, the missile’s planned retirement date.

This new weapon system is the most cost-effective option for maintaining a safe, secure, and effective land-based leg of the nuclear triad, according to the AFNWC.

In recent years, China and Russia have actively engaged in advancing and improving their nuclear capable arsenals programs, including their ICBMs.

The Department of Defense claimed that China is developing new ICBMs, possibly capable of carrying conventional warheads.

If developed and fielded, “such capabilities would allow the PRC to threaten conventional strikes against targets in the continental United States, Hawaii and Alaska,” a senior defense official said at a briefing on Pentagon’s 2023 China Military Power Report.

Operational leaders from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., the sole installation hosting both Air Force legs of the nuclear triad, echoed the palpable threat posed by China.

In October, Russia also claimed its military exercise rehearsed a “massive” nuclear strike in response to an enemy nuclear attack.

According to reports citing the Kremlin’s statement, the exercise involved “practical launches of ballistic and cruise missiles,” including a RS-24 Yars intercontinental ballistic missile fired from a test site in Russia’s far east.

Air Force Gives Lockheed $1 Billion to Build New Reentry Vehicle for Sentinel

Air Force Gives Lockheed $1 Billion to Build New Reentry Vehicle for Sentinel

The Air Force has given Lockheed Martin a $996 million contract to produce a reentry vehicle (RV) for its new Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile by Oct. 20, 2039.

Under this sole-source acquisition deal, announced Oct. 30, Lockheed will engineer, manufacture, and design the new RV, dubbed MK21A, in several locations including King of Prussia, Penn.

The contract, overseen by the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center, aims to reduce technical risks and ensure the affordability of the RV, according to the Pentagon’s release.

The specialized RV will carry the W87-1 warhead, which entered a new phase this year in its Modification Program involving tests and analysis to validate the chosen design.

National laboratories are developing and producing test hardware for the warhead, expected to deploy in the early 2030s with the Sentinel ICBM.

The LGM-35 Sentinel, formerly known as the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD), is poised to replace 400 Minuteman III ICBMs currently in service for more than 50 years across the continental United States.

The incoming Sentinel project features an open system architecture which allows easy upgrades as technology develops between now and 2075, the missile’s planned retirement date.

It is also designed to be easier to maintain, which should minimize the security forces footprint required during maintenance time.

All components of the MM III missiles will be replaced with new components for the Sentinel, including the motors, interstage, propulsion system rocket engine, and missile guidance set.

However, the number, size, configuration, and design of the nuclear warheads, which are provided by the Department of Energy, are expected to remain the same.

This new weapon system is the most cost-effective option for maintaining a safe, secure, and effective land-based leg of the nuclear triad, the AFNWC claims.

The current Minuteman III ICBMs will be taken out of service through demilitarization and disposal procedures.

Last month, Pentagon acquisition chief William LaPlante said the Air Force is speeding up tasks in the Sentinel project to meet the crucial initial operational capability date of September 2030.

Northrop Grumman, the prime contractor for Sentinel, has been creating mockup versions of Minuteman III silos and systems to make it easier and faster to build or upgrade them.

Lockheed previously received $108.3 million contract for technology maturation and risk reduction on the new MK21A reentry vehicle, awarded in October 2019.

Why the Military May Need Microgrids for Overseas Bases to Win a Near-Peer Fight

Why the Military May Need Microgrids for Overseas Bases to Win a Near-Peer Fight

A new paper written by an Air Force engineer warns of a major vulnerability on U.S. military bases overseas: their power infrastructure. Most bases are wired into the electrical grids of their host nations, but if that grid fails due to a natural disaster or is destroyed by an adversary, the backup generators on base may not have enough fuel to last more than a week.

“The generators will have to operate for however long the outage is,” Lt. Col. Nathan Olsen, special assistant to the executive director of systems engineering and architecture in the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, told Air & Space Forces Magazine. 

“If we’re in a contested environment, that means we would have to send technicians out to maintain them, we would have to send fuel to keep them running,” he said, pointing to the example of hospital generators in Gaza running out of fuel due to the Israeli blockade there.

“The military would be in a similar problem, unless they get fuel to the generators and get them operating or get the host nation power back up and running,” he said.

But the military may be able to avoid that problem if it builds more robust power grids at its overseas bases. These ‘microgrids’ could draw power from a range of renewable and nonrenewable sources in order to sustain long-term operations.

“They would almost be like a mini-city, operating their own power plants without the help of the host nation,” Olsen said. 

microgrid
A microgrid temporary power system supplied critical power in Maunabo, Puerto Rico, after Hurricane Maria in 2017 until the town’s main grid came back online. U.S. Army photo by Gerald Rogers

Gridlock

In an article published in the Fall issue of Air University’s Air & Space Operations Review, Olsen pointed out how Russia targeted Ukraine’s infrastructure, causing electricity, heat, and hot water shortages across the country in 2022. Beyond that, Russia also reduced the flow of natural gas to Europe, where several U.S. military bases are located, causing a spike in natural gas prices. Natural disasters, climate change, and cyber disruptions can have a similar effect on a host nation’s power grids, which could be an Achilles’ heel for U.S. bases abroad.

“Undoubtedly, U.S. overseas bases are in a situation where they are predominantly dependent on host-nation and local energy supplies,” Olsen wrote. “Diversifying energy sources and moving toward a localized, U.S.-­run energy source—a microgrid—would lessen this vulnerability and increase overall reliability and resiliency.”

A microgrid, he explained, is a localized group of electricity generators that can operate independently of the host nation’s electrical grid. Several features of microgrids make them more resilient to disruption than a group of backup generators. The first is a storage system: batteries that allow bases to retain energy. The second is a central controller, a monitoring system that coordinates the microgrid’s power sources and balances and controls electrical loads, Olsen said.

“In a microgrid with storage, commercial off-the-shelf charge controllers link all power sources and smartly combine them to meet user demand,” he wrote. “If the renewable power source is not meeting demand, the control system draws from the battery storage or from another power generator.”

Having a variety of sources from which to draw power is the third element that could give microgrids an edge over existing systems. A base dependent on fossil fuels to power its backup generators may be paralyzed by a fuel shortage, but a base that uses solar panels, wind turbines, biomass, nuclear microreactors, and/or fossil fuel-powered generators could keep running even if one source was offline. 

Energy technology is rapidly advancing, with innovations like new batteries that store energy for longer and solar panels that continue generating power in snowy, overcast conditions. Nuclear microreactors are another promising technology—one the size of a standard shipping container could likely power an entire base, Olsen wrote, and a pilot program at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska seeks to bring one online in 2027. 

“That’s the great thing about this—there is a lot of new technology that is increasing the possibilities to generate power without relying specifically on fossil fuels,” he said.

microgrid
A solar panel gathers light from the sun to provide energy aboard Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Calif., Jan. 13, 2014. (Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Christopher Johns)

Charging Up

Microgrids are being installed at places like Yokota Air Base, Japan; Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla.; and Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Calif., which claims it can operate for up to 21 days off a mixture of renewable and nonrenewable energy sources. Still, Olsen said the military needs to be more aggressive pursuing microgrids to be prepared for future conflicts or natural disasters.

“Although the Department of Defense recognizes the importance of reliable power, it is not implementing innovative solutions like microgrids quick enough,” he wrote. “Congress can help increase energy security and reliability in the military by mandating microgrids at overseas bases and providing funding to enact this mandate.”

The Army is setting an example for the rest of the services when it comes to microgrids, Olsen said. Its garrison on Kwajalein Island, which is just 3.5 miles long and a quarter-mile wide, has a microgrid of generators and solar panels that operate independently of the rest of the island’s grid. The service plans to set up a microgrid at every installation by 2035 and develop enough renewable energy and battery storage to make its critical missions self-sustaining by 2040. 

Direction and funding from Congress could push the other branches to adopt similar plans, said Olsen, who cited Gen. David Petraeus’ 2011 quote that “energy is the lifeblood of our warfighting capabilities.”

“Our dependence on power and technology has only increased,” Olsen said. “I think being able to provide that secure power will get rid of a potential vulnerability, help us prevent conflict and help our allies and partners in the future.”

How Minot Leaders Are Tackling Quality-of-Life Challenges Amid the Cold and Isolation

How Minot Leaders Are Tackling Quality-of-Life Challenges Amid the Cold and Isolation

Minot Air Force Base, N.D., holds a unique position among Air Force installations. As the only base to host both bombers and intercontinental ballistic missiles, it is crucial to the service’s nuclear mission. But it is also isolated, hours away from major population centers and located in the far north of the U.S., creating long and cold winters. Airmen staffing the nation’s nuclear forces also have to put in long hours or even days on the job to be ready at a moment’s notice. 

For years, the base has been tagged as one of the least desirable for Airmen to be stationed. Minot leaders are well aware of the stigma and are working to ameliorate some key quality-of-life concerns, they said recently. 

“Last week we got about 10 inches of snow. Currently it’s about 18, 20 degrees outdoors with a wind chill of about 8 degrees or so, and we’re still out there doing the job,” Col. Kenneth C. McGhee, the commander of the 91st Missile Wing, said Oct. 30 during a virtual AFA Warfighters in Action event. “Our Airmen are some of the finest American citizens that you will ever meet. … And so every single Airmen, we put our arms around, and there are challenges that we need to make sure we’re taking care of them.” 

Compounding those challenges is the fact that many of those Airmen are young—McGhee said two-thirds of the base’s security forces are below the age of 26. He added it is not uncommon for two second lieutenants to be tasked with manning a launch control center—the underground bunkers where missileers work in 24-48 hour shifts on alert to launch ICBMs. 

Feeling isolated can be particularly dangerous for young service members, who face a higher risk of suicide. Col. Daniel S. Hoadley, the commander of the 5th Bomb Wing, said the civilian community of Minot, N.D., recognizes the possibility of loneliness and has worked hard to address it. 

“I’ve been a lot of places in my 23-year Air Force career and never experienced a level of community support to the level that we see here at Minot. They truly go the extra mile to support our Airmen,” said Hoadley. “And I think that they really understand that for a lot of our young folks … are a long way from home and this is their first assignment.” 

As examples, Hoadley cited “Military Appreciation Days” hosted by the North Dakota State Fair and the local Minot State football team offering free admission for military members, as well as the “Home for the Holidays” program, which raises money from the local community to send more than 100 Airmen home for Thanksgiving or Christmas. 

Tom Ross, Mayor of the city of Minot, North Dakota, and other civic leaders pose for a photo with Team Minot leaders during Norsk Hostfest in the city of Minot, North Dakota, Sept. 30, 2023. The boarding pass represented donations used to send Team Minot Airmen home for the holidays. Photo by Airman 1st Class Trust Tate

Travel is a common concern among Minot Airmen, Hoadley acknowledged, and not just for the holidays. Families who need advanced medical care often need to travel for hours to cities like Bismark (120 miles away), Fargo (280 miles), and even Minneapolis (500 miles) to see specialists. 

“It requires them to take a number of days off of work. From a financial perspective, there’s a burden there,” Hoadley said. “Certainly the Air Force is doing our part to reimburse them for that.” 

Families also face challenges with child care, particularly with the unique work schedules among ICBM crews. It’s standard for missileers and security forces to be out in the sprawling missile fields for an entire week at a time, McGhee noted. 

“We have what’s called missile care, where we do have some providers who the crew members and our families are able to leave their children with family care providers for a period of up to seven days at a time,” McGhee said. “That is expensive and carries a significant burden to those family members, and so sometimes that becomes a challenge and we’re always trying to find different ways to alleviate that challenge.” 

The Minot community also supports itself with the family child care program, which trains and pays military spouses to watch other Airmen’s children in their own homes. 

“We trade off like every other week with [Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska] on being the number one FCC program in the Air Force,” Hoadley said. “So that’s something that’s definitely a highlight up here.” 

Still, both wing commanders noted that capacity remains an issue. While the base moved to expand its child development center a few years ago, staffing is a struggle. 

“One thing we can’t organically do is make more people come to work here,” McGhee said. “So we’re trying to find unique ways, different programs in order to increase the number of child care workers to support our men and women every single day.” 

“We are putting as many bonuses and hiring incentives as we can against filling the roles there and really just trying to create an environment where individuals enjoy coming to work every day,” Hoadley added. 

Ultimately, however, there is only so much Minot can do on its own. 

‘We’ve also been engaged with the local civic leaders and political leaders inside of the state of North Dakota to amplify this point,” Hoadley said. “And frankly, it’s a shared challenge. I mean, as they had their legislative session this year, one of the primary topics of discussion is the impact of child care and the role it plays in economic capacity for the state. Whether you’re trying to run a business or provide nuclear deterrence, child care is a key enabler.” 

Senior Airman Brydon Ott, Tactical Response Force with the 54th Helicopter Squadron, allows a child to wear his vest at Glenburn Public School, North Dakota, Sept. 27, 2022. Ott and the other aircrew allowed the students at Glenburn Public School to tour the aircraft and flight gear. U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Zachary Wright