Air Force-Wide Digital WAPS Testing to Start February 2024

Air Force-Wide Digital WAPS Testing to Start February 2024

The Air Force is set to roll out its digital weighted Airman promotion system (WAPS) in February 2024, in time for the technical sergeant testing cycle. The new system, eWAPS, replaces the paper-and-pencil method, which is a headache for administrators and has often been lost in the mail. Digitizing the system has been on the to-do list for branch senior leaders for years.

“When it comes to the Force of the Future, it is essential we modernize the IT systems our Airmen use—to include how we test for promotion,” Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne Bass told Air & Space Forces Magazine in a statement.

WAPS is a standardized test which helps the service identify Airmen worthy of promotion to the ranks of staff sergeant (E5) and technical sergeant (E6). Test-takers are quizzed on topics such as career field information, Air Force history, and customs and courtesies. In 2021, the test was modified to include situational judgment questions to assess leadership qualities.

Officials expressed frustration with the paper WAPS method, which in 2021 Lt. Gen. Brian Kelly, then-deputy chief of staff for manpower, personnel, and services said was “embarrassing” and “makes all of us as senior leaders absolutely crazy.” Bass shared his opinion.

“It is 2022, if we can’t get out of taking a No. 2 pencil into promotion tests, something is wrong,” Bass said last year.

2022 came and went without digitization, which the senior leader attributed in part to not all locations having the systems in place to perform digital testing. But that appears to have changed. Bass said pilot tests were conducted across 61 bases from July to September, with more pilots scheduled through December to make sure the installations can support eWAPS. 

Laying the groundwork for digital testing proved to be a difficult task. A Nov. 6 press release from the 18th Wing at Kadena Air Base, Japan explained that the education center there required funding from Air Force headquarters to order individual test stations and “advanced computer systems” to meet the new requirements. Engineers on the base then renovated the testing area before it was declared fully operational in September.

Air Force Times reported in September that the roll-out would begin in January. An Air Force spokesperson explained that Airmen will begin registering for eWAPS in January, but the testing itself has always been set to coincide with the E-6 testing cycle starting in February.

eWAPS sits at the intersection of two ongoing issues for the Air Force: personnel development and digital modernization. On the personnel side, Bass is pursuing a number of changes to better retain and grow Airmen, such as reforming developmental special duties, increasing commissioning opportunities for enlisted Airmen, offering better incentives to keep technical experts, and reforming how Airmen are assigned to duty locations.

On the digital side, the slow pace of setting up eWAPS is one of several frustrations Airmen feel about the IT systems they depend on to work, arrange travel, and process important paperwork. Many of those systems are outdated and struggle to perform basic tasks.

“Our Airmen always say, ‘I wonder if our leaders know, I wonder if our leaders understand the challenges we have.’ And I’m like, ‘Yes, we do, and we share those challenges, right?’” Bass said last year. “Like, we’re frustrated with the IT systems that we have, I mean, beyond belief. As many times as you have to add in your PIN, I have to do that too. I mean, I send stuff home to my phone or my whatever so that I can actually watch whatever I need to watch, because I can’t do it on my work [computer].”

If successful, eWAPS may represent progress on both issues.

“I look forward to hearing the feedback from our Airmen and appreciate the work by all to get us here,” Bass said about the upcoming roll-out.

B-1 Bombers, Guided-Missile Submarine in Middle East

B-1 Bombers, Guided-Missile Submarine in Middle East

The United States displayed a show of force in the Middle East on Nov. 5 with bomber flyovers and the deployment of a guided-missile submarine in the region against a backdrop of continuing attacks against U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria.

The U.S. is attempting to deter Iran, Lebanese Hezbollah, and other Iranian proxy forces from trying to capitalize on the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza and stoke a broader regional conflict.

The Dyess Air Force Base, Texas-headquartered B-1 bombers, which deployed to Europe in October, flew over parts of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) on Nov. 5. The flight was part of a “long-planned Bomber Task Force mission” Pentagon Press Secretary Air Force Brig. Gen. Patrick S. Ryder told reporters Nov. 6. The bombers’ last known location was Incirlik Air Base in Turkey, part of U.S. European Command (EUCOM).

“It’s important to differentiate the Bomber Task Force mission from the current situation in the Middle East,” Ryder said.

A U.S. official familiar with the mission said the B-1s flew from a location in EUCOM through CENTCOM and onto the U.S. Africa Command region before returning to EUCOM.

The B-1s have a greater payload than either the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber or B-52 Stratofortress. Along with an undisclosed number of B-1s, some 100 Air Force support personnel arrived at RAF Fairford in the U.K. on Oct. 13 for the BTF.  

During typical BTFs, bombers conduct exercises with allies and partners in the region and make unannounced base visits. B-1s from a BTF deploying to Europe conducted live-fire exercises at ranges in Jordan and Saudi Arabia in June. The Israeli Air Force separately joined the B-1s along their route.

Long used as a U.S. aerial tanker base and deployment hub in the region, thousands of protesters descended on Incirlik on Nov. 5. Based on photos circulating on social media, protesters swarmed the fence line at Incirlik, angry at American support for Israel in the wake of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks on Israel. Turkish police used tear gas and water cannons to subdue the protesters, who eventually withdrew.

Hours after the protesters dispersed, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken arrived in the Turkish capital of Ankara for talks with Turkey’s defense minister, Hakan Fidan, about the war in Gaza and other regional issues. Blinken also made a surprise visit to Baghdad to meet with Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani in an attempt to stop attacks on American troops by Iranian-backed Iraqi militias.

According to a U.S. military official, American troops have been attacked in Iraq and Syria at least 38 times since Oct. 17. At least six of those attacks have occurred since Nov. 5, a significant uptick.

The U.S. also said the number of personnel injured in the attacks is more than double what the Pentagon previously disclosed, rising to at least 45 troops. Ryder said they suffered a mix of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and “minor injuries.” Two of the personnel who were diagnosed with TBI initially returned to duty but have now been transported to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Germany, for “further examination and care.” The U.S. has ascribed the attacks to Iranian-backed militias.

The U.S. presence in the region now includes two aircraft carriers, the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Red Sea and the USS Gerald R. Ford in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, increased air defense systems, and doubled the number of Air Force fighter and attack squadrons—up to three F-16 squadrons, one F-15E squadron, and two A-10 squadrons.

However, the BTF is different, the Pentagon says.

“We do have the ability to walk and chew gum,” Ryder said.

The BTFs—which are deployed multiple times a year to multiple theaters—demonstrate “to our allies and our partners the capabilities we have to respond to a variety of situations, while showing our potential adversaries that we have these capabilities,” he added.

U.S. Central Command identified the submarine as an Ohio-class cruise missile boat operating in its area of responsibility under the control of the U.S. Fifth Fleet. Theater commands rarely announce the presence of a submarine in their areas, as the vessels generally rely on stealth, so the move is undoubtedly a message to deter would-be opportunists in the region.

An Ohio-class submarine approaches the Mubarak Peace Bridge while transiting the Suez Canal, Nov. 5. The boat is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations to help support maritime security and stability in the Middle East region. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Jonathan Word

Photos of the boat in the Suez Canal were released along with the announcement.

The Navy has four Ohio-class guided-missile submarines—SSGNs—capable of carrying 145 Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles (TLAMs) each. A TLAM has the destructive capacity of a 2,000-pound bomb but can be launched from up to 1,400 nautical miles away and can employ low-level, terrain-following routes to avoid detection and interception. The boats were converted from carrying nuclear-armed Trident sea-launched ballistic missiles in the early 2000s when the Defense Department determined that, rather than retiring four Ohio-class vessels, they would be useful in a conventional role.

The first use of SSGNs in their conventional land-attack role was during Operation Odyssey Dawn in 2011 when the USS Florida fired more than 90 Tomahawks at targets in Libya. The SSGN’s Tomahawk load is 50 percent greater than that of a guided missile destroyer.

The U.S. Fifth Fleet and the Pentagon declined to offer further details on the exact submarine deployed to CENTCOM.

“What this does is further support our deterrence efforts in the region, and I’ll just leave it at that,” Ryder said.

Allvin to Airmen: The Course Is Set. Now We Must Follow Through

Allvin to Airmen: The Course Is Set. Now We Must Follow Through

Gen. David W. Allvin’s first message to his Airmen praises each of the past three Air Force Chiefs of Staff for the work they did to modernize and set the priorities for a 21st Century Air Force. Now, he says, it’s up to every Airman to “follow through” to ensure those initiatives bear the fruit needed to meet the challenges of tomorrow. 

Just days after being sworn in as USAF’s 23rd Chief of Staff, Allvin spelled out his priorities in a Nov. 6 memo to Airmen in which he emphasized the essential role the Air Force could play in future conflict.  

“The attributes of the changing character of war are ones well suited for our service. Speed, tempo, range, agility, flexibility, precise lethality, and resilience have been the hallmarks of airpower since our inception,” Allvin wrote. “The future holds ambiguity, but our task is clear: We must now follow through.”

Allvin takes the helm at a critical juncture in the Pentagon’s move to implement the 2022 National Defense Strategy, which identifies China as the pacing threat due to its aggressive military buildup, the scale of its economy, and its great technical prowess, while noting the challenges posed by Russia, Iran, North Korea, and radical extremism. 

The Oct. 7 attack by Hamas on Israel demonstrates how regional crises can suddenly erupt and how the tentacles of multiple threat actors can be intertwined. The United States scrambled to deploy air, ground, and naval forces in the wake of that attack in an effort to deter others from entering the war. But each of the threats identified in the NDS has some kind of connection to the region. The Pentagon must grapple with the possibility that multiple conflicts may break out simultaneously in different parts of the globe. 

Allvin, a former test pilot with more than 4,600 flight hours in more than 30 aircraft—including 800 flight test hours and 100 combat hours—is familiar with those challenges, having held key roles in Europe, Afghanistan, and the Pentagon on both the Air Staff and Joint Staff. He helped write “America’s Air Force: A Call to the Future” in 2014 and the “Air Force Future Operating Concept” in 2015, documents that laid the groundwork for what was initially termed “multi-domain operations” and later evolved to become and Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (C-JADC2). 

Allvin was Vice Chief under Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., who became Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Oct. 1 and played a lead role in tackling recruiting and retention as the senior member of Brown’s Barriers to Service Cross-Functional Team, which worked to eliminate processes and rules that were keeping otherwise-qualified civilians from joining the force.

Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin speaks with Air Force and Space Force ROTC cadets and newly commissioned officers at the Pentagon, Arlington, Va., July 14, 2023. Air Force photo by Eric Dietrich

“We have formidable challenges ahead,” Allvin wrote, adding that “many of the solutions to these challenges are not a mystery” and that the Air Force has been working to address those challenges “for some time.”

The answer is not a handful of new initiatives, but the essential follow-through necessary to turn existing initiatives into results. Repeating that word follow through at least seven times he told Airmen it’s not time now to pause, but to move out:

  • Follow through—on the changes our Airmen and their families expect and deserve. Changes worthy of their commitment and sacrifice, and suited to fulfill the oaths we take on service of this Nation. 

  • Follow through—to transform the products of our Operational Imperatives into actual meaningful operational capability. This requires thoughtful consideration and integration, with the ultimate aim of maximizing combat effectiveness.

  • “Follow through—to ensure our force presentation and force generation models are aligned to the way we intend to fight as articulated in our current Air Force Future Operating Concept. This means adapting many of our current paradigms for units of action, and orienting toward team preparation for deployment to be combat effective more rapidly.

  • Follow through—to define and refine the force design that provides the optimum size, shape, and composition of our force. This entails not only incorporation of currently unfielded classes of capabilities (e.g., collaborative combat aircraft (CCA)), but also new competencies and skill sets for which we must organize and train future Airmen.

  • Follow through—to adapt our organizational structure to optimize for great power competition. This entails applying “integrated by design” to capability development. This organizational design should focus on ensuring designated commanders can focus on training, readiness, and warfighting—with both the requisite authority and accountability. Meanwhile, other commanders will focus on supporting capability development and sustainment. However, all will be oriented on providing well trained, equipped, and ready forces for deterrence and conflict.

  • Follow through—on training transformation. This requires continued focus on learner-centric training and education to optimize individual human performance. We have demonstrated new ways to leverage technology to not only improve information absorption and application for specific skill sets, but also ways to tailor training to individual Airmen and enable them to learn and apply skills more rapidly and effectively throughout their years of service.

  • Follow through—on harnessing the innovative talent and spirit that exists in every corner of our Air Force by vectoring that energy towards solving our key Air Force challenges. We must continue to connect and empower the innovation ecosystem so the brilliance of individuals can better serve the entire Air Force team.

  • “Most importantly, we must follow through on our commitment to the success of the team. This includes demanding and protecting an environment in which all Airmen can reach their full potential. It means uplifting our wingmen, while holding ourselves accountable for our actions. It means removing barriers while maintaining and enforcing standards. It means all-axis leadership—top-down, peer-to-peer, and even ‘leading up.’”

Allvin has been the acting Chief of Staff of the Air Force since Oct. 1 while his nomination was held up in the Senate by Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who has blocked general officer promotions over concerns about DOD funding travel for troops and family members seeking abortions or other reproductive health services unavailable in their duty locations. 

After making no inroads with Tuberville, despite drawing increasing ire—and in some cases outright vitriol—of fellow Republicans, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called individual roll-call votes for the leaders of the military services up for a vote. 

Despite the Senate’s political gridlock the upper chamber had little objection to Allvin himself, swiftly confirming him in a 95-1 vote on Nov. 2 once his nomination reached the floor. Allvin was sworn in soon after the vote by Kendall at Falcon Stadium at the Air Force Academy, his alma mater. Both men were attending Corona, a conference of senior Air Force leaders that Kendall and now Allvin lead.

“We know each of us is serving in a place of importance in this great Air Force, and in a time of extraordinary consequence,” Allvin concluded. “I can think of no cause more honorable than this, and I could not be more proud to serve as your Chief of Staff. We know the challenges… let’s follow through and meet them head on!”

What’s Next For Air Force Special Tactics?

What’s Next For Air Force Special Tactics?

Editor’s Note: This is the third in a three-part series about Special Reconnaissance. The first story can be found here and the second can be found here.

Fort Liberty, N.C. — Members of the Air Force’s newest special tactics career field, special reconnaissance (SR) are trained to infiltrate enemy territory and gather information on hostile air defenses. That mission is part of a larger shift as the military prepares for conflicts with near-peer adversaries such as China and Russia.

Older special tactics career fields are also feeling the shift as they focus on skills not often utilized during the past 20 years of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). For example, combat controllers (CCTs) are certified Federal Aviation Administration air traffic controllers who can establish airfields in hostile environments. But during counterterrorism operations, they often served as joint terminal attack controllers, calling in airstrikes to support ground troops.

“For us, GWOT was the JTAC mission,” Capt. Max Krasnov, a special tactics officer and training flight commander with the 352nd Special Warfare Training Squadron at Pope Army Airfield, N.C., told Air & Space Forces Magazine. “We were doing some airfield missions, but I would say 95 percent of what we were doing was JTAC.”

As the Air Force prepares to operate from small islands in the Pacific, CCTs may find themselves helping guide aircraft to austere airfields more often than they did during America’s conflicts in the Middle East.

“Historically, the air mobility mission is one of our bread-and-butters,” he said.

special tactics
Airmen from the Kentucky Air National Guard’s 123rd Special Tactics Squadron prepare to conduct combat search-and-rescue from an MH-6M Little Bird that was offloaded from a MC-130J Commando II during Exercise Agile Chariot near Riverton, Wyoming, May 2, 2023. U.S. Air National Guard photo by Master Sgt. Phil Speck

In May, combat controllers with the Kentucky Air National Guard’s 123rd Special Tactics Squadron guided MC-130J transport aircraft, A-10 attack jets, MH-6M helicopters, and MQ-9 drones in for a landing on two highways in Wyoming, an exercise meant to practice generating airpower in austere locations.

“We’re paving the way for what we think ‘forward’ is going to look like,” Master Sgt. Devin Butcher, the lead planner and organizer for the ground force in the exercise, said in a press release at the time. “It’s our responsibility to provide options for the access and placement of all our assets — not just Air Force, but Army, Navy, Marines, everybody.”

A new CCT recruiting ad also emphasized that role with the line “we turn hell into an airstrip … and clear the way for others to follow.”

Meanwhile, the JTAC mission could take a different form in a near-peer conflict, where enemy air defenses may force friendly aircraft to use longer-range munitions dropped farther from the target. In that situation, SR Airmen, who specialize in deep reconnaissance, may serve as remote spotting scopes for CCTs farther away.

“There are a lot of scenarios where the JTAC is back at the base and a team is passing the relevant information of what’s going on,” Krasnov said. “They know the ground truth, but I am trained to process that and explain it to aircraft.”

Pararescue

In GWOT, PJs and other medics often rode helicopters out to injured troops and cared for them on the flight back to a large base with robust medical facilities. But in a near-peer conflict, operators may be much farther from medical facilities, and there may be no flights due to distance and enemy air defenses.

“There was no chance a mission was getting approved if there was not a specific plan that anyone on that mission could get transported to a high level of surgical care within an hour,” said Krasnov of his deployments. “To go from that to ‘we’re probably not going to hear from you for a week’ is a much different mindset and a much different level of risk that you need to plan for.”

air force pjs
A U.S. Airman, training with the 68th Rescue Squadron, takes notes on simulated casualties, Sept. 17, 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class William Finn V

PJs are now training to provide care for more patients for longer periods of time than they typically did during GWOT. In a recent exercise off the coast of California, PJs practiced caring for injured patients amid missile strikes, contested airspace, limited supplies, and other challenges meant to simulate what they may face in a war in the Pacific. In one scenario, Airmen treated about two dozen patients after a missile strike on an airfield, then moved them to a contingency location via helicopter.

“This simulates one of the most likely mission sets we could respond to: mass casualties caused by a missile strike at a forward operating site,” Master Sgt. Trevor Runyan, the Instructor Flight Chief at the 68th Rescue Squadron, a formal training unit for PJs, previously told Air & Space Forces Magazine.

Later on, the PJs rescued simulated pilots who had been shot down and landed in the water. Some had drifted into contested airspace, so the PJs jumped out of fixed-wing aircraft with parachute-configured Zodiac boats to pick them up, then bring them back to friendly airspace where a helicopter could carry them to shore. Throughout the exercise, the PJs juggled multiple missions and limited resources.

“As a 10-man element, they must prioritize missions and determine if and when they should operate as a split team, and the risks associated with that,” Runyan said.

While counterterrorism missions continue in the Middle East and Africa, special operations forces across the military are also reassessing their approach to risk in preparation for near-peer conflict.

“For U.S. ground special operations leaders, attitudes toward risk tolerance remain shaped by the last two decades of war in the Middle East and Africa,” special operations expert Spencer Reed wrote in January for War on the Rocks. “But if these leaders are to offer utility to the joint force or their parent services in the future fight, they should reframe and reassess how they view risk now, ahead of a future armed conflict with a great power adversary.”

ICBM Test Failure Puts Nuclear Modernization Effort Into Focus

ICBM Test Failure Puts Nuclear Modernization Effort Into Focus

A recent failed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile test has led to new concerns about the age of America’s land-based nuclear arsenal.

“It has served our country well and we will continue to depend on it to deter nuclear war until the 2030s, but this week’s test is a stark reminder that nothing lasts forever,” Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said in a statement released on Nov. 3. “We must modernize our aging nuclear deterrent and replace the Minuteman III missile—as well as the rest of our nuclear enterprise—with modern systems.”

An unarmed Minuteman III missile was terminated during a test launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base, Calif., due to an anomaly on Nov. 1.  

While the Air Force is investigating to pinpoint the issue, Tim Ryan, Senior Resident Fellow at the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, said that he doesn’t believe the anomaly is linked to the age of the Minuteman system, suggesting it could have been caused by a variety of reasons.

Anomaly can represent any deviation or irregularity from the expected or projected behavior during the launch and testing process of the missile, which itself is an “extremely rigid and rigorous” regime.

Ryan emphasized that MM III technology remains reliable, as proven through regular flight tests conducted multiple times a year. The nuclear-capable missile has a range of 6,000-plus miles and can travel at approximately 15,000 miles per hour.

However, he added that other aspects of the weapon system, such as the silo, electronics, and warhead, are equally as old, and have been long neglected.

“As a whole, the weapon system is reliable. But it could use vital upgrades, just to be able to bring the weapon system up to date,” said Ryan.

The upcoming Sentinel missiles, which U.S. officials say will be easier to maintain and upgrade, are set to replace the 400 Minuteman IIIs in the continental U.S.  

The Pentagon is accelerating the Sentinel tasks to meet the operational goal by Sept. 2030, as part of the nation’s broader modernization initiative of all three components of nuclear forces—air, land, and sea.

The Sentinel program is currently updating its integrated master schedule alongside Air Force and Office of the Secretary of Defense efforts to implement new acquisition strategies, an Air Force Spokesperson told Air & Space Forces Magazine.

The Air Force also contracted Lockheed Martin to produce customized reentry vehicle MK21A for the ICBM, expected to be completed by 2039.

The RV program has just entered the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) on Oct. 30, the spokesperson added.

However, challenges still exist regarding the timely delivery of the Sentinel system.

House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and other members of Congress have previously questioned the necessity of simultaneous triad modernization, advocating for independent validation of the Air Force’s cost estimates for the Sentinel.

The Air Force also stressed its planning and operations of the project being significantly hindered by continuing resolutions. In October, the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center said they face budget constraints that affect delivering necessary nuclear capabilities for daily deterrence due to these restrictions.

Ryan emphasized the importance of Congress prioritizing the nuclear modernization effort and passing a budget, which has yet to happen for the current fiscal year.

“They need to understand the impact of passing continuing resolutions on a program like Sentinel, and ensure consistent funding at the levels and timing that can make it a reality.”

He added that the launch results from Nov. 1 are not expected to affect future scheduled tests unless the analysis discovers a flight problem, which has never occurred in prior tests.

Multiple Minuteman III tests are slated for the upcoming year at Vandenberg Space Force base, as ICBM launches are planned years in advance.

Ken Mattingly, Apollo and Space Shuttle Astronaut, Dies at 87

Ken Mattingly, Apollo and Space Shuttle Astronaut, Dies at 87

Thomas Kenneth Mattingly, II, the command module pilot of Apollo 16, commander of two Space Shuttle missions, and an aerospace industry executive died in Arlington, Va. on Oct. 31 at 87. He was one of only two astronauts to fly both an Apollo and Shuttle in space.

Mattingly was commissioned in the Navy in 1958 and served as a pilot aboard aircraft carriers from 1960-1965. After completing the Air Force Aerospace Research Test Pilot School, he was one of 19 pilots selected in 1966 to be a NASA astronaut.

During his first five years with NASA, Mattingly supported the Apollo 8 and 11 missions and was the astronaut liaison to the industry/government team developing the Apollo space suit and backpack.

He was selected for and trained as command module pilot of Apollo 13, but due to exposure to Rubella, he was removed from the mission only three days before launch, replaced by backup astronaut Jack Swigert.

Enroute to the moon, Apollo 13 suffered an oxygen tank explosion in its service module, which decimated the command and service module’s power supply. Mattingly helped develop power transfer workarounds between the command and lunar modules that allowed the latter to be used as a lifeboat and revive the command module’s systems in time for re-entry.

Despite his exposure, Mattingly did not become sick with Rubella.

Mattingly’s contributions to the ill-fated mission were recounted in the 1995 film, “Apollo 13,” which was nominated for an Academy Award as Best Picture, and in which he was played by actor Gary Sinise.

In a Nov. 1 statement, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said Mattingly “stayed behind and provided key real-time decisions to successfully bring home the wounded spacecraft and the crew of Apollo 13.”

Back in the Apollo flight rotation, Mattingly was named command module pilot for Apollo 16, the penultimate moon mission, which sent astronauts John Young and Charles Duke to the lunar surface for three days in April 1972. During that time, Mattingly, alone in the command module, conducted 36 experiments and mapped large swaths of the lunar surface.

On the return flight to Earth, Mattingly conducted a 73-minute extra-vehicular activity (EVA) to retrieve film canisters from the craft’s service module. To date, it is one of only three deep-space spacewalks conducted beyond geostationary orbit.

Ken Mattingly performing an extra-vehicular activity (EVA) during Apollo 16/NASA

After the Apollo program, Mattingly became a key figure in the development, test, and operation of the Space Shuttle. From 1973 to 1978, he was head of the astronaut office to support the Space Transportation System (STS), at which point he became technical assistant for flight test of the program.

From December 1979 to April 1981, he headed the astronaut office ascent/entry group. Mattingly was the backup commander for the STS-2 and STS-3 missions, the second and third orbital test flights of the shuttle Columbia.

He commanded STS-4 in July 1982. The Columbia mission was the last of four test flights of the shuttle system, which completed 112 orbits of the Earth. It landed on July 4 at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. where President Ronald Reagan greeted the returning Mattingly and pilot Henry Hartsfield. From June 1983 through May 1984, Mattingly headed the Astronaut Office DOD Support Group

STS-4 Crew Portrait showing Commander Thomas K. (Ken) Mattingly, II., right, and Pilot Henry W. Hartsfield, Jr./NASA

In January, 1985, Mattingly commanded STS-51C with a crew of five, which was the first dedicated military mission of the shuttle aboard Discovery. The mission launched a secret Department of Defense payload using the Inertial Upper Stage booster from the payload bay. The mission remains largely classified.

During his years as an astronaut, Mattingly logged over 504 hours in space. He retired from NASA in 1985, but returned to the Navy, retiring from that service as a two-star Admiral the following year.

Working in the public sector, Mattingly was director of Grumman’s Space Station Support Division, headed the Atlas booster program for General Dynamics, and was vice-president at Lockheed, where he ran the X-33 space shuttle successor program later canceled by the Pentagon and NASA in 2001, with 85 percent of the initial flight vehicle complete.

“TK Mattingly was key to the success of our Apollo Program, and his shining personality will ensure he is remembered throughout history,” Nelson said.

Mattingly held an aeronautical engineering degree from Auburn University, and received numerous aerospace awards and honors, including the Department of Defense and NASA Distinguished Service Medals, the Society of Experimental Test Pilots Ivan Kincheloe Award, the Navy Distinguished Service Medal, and the Johnson Space Center Certificate of Commendation and Group Achievement Award. He had accumulated over 7,200 flying hours, including more than 5,000 in jets.

US MQ-9s Flying Over Gaza Amid Israel-Hamas War

US MQ-9s Flying Over Gaza Amid Israel-Hamas War

The U.S. has been flying MQ-9 drones over Gaza as Washington tries to gather information about American and other hostages held by Hamas and other militants there.

The flights, which the Pentagon acknowledged Nov. 3, began after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel that killed more than 1,400 people and has led to a fierce conflict.

Roughly 240 hostages were taken by Hamas, including some American citizens. The Pentagon said the drones are not carrying weapons but are conducting surveillance missions. 

“In support of hostage recovery efforts, the U.S. is conducting unarmed UAV flights over Gaza, as well as providing advice and assistance to support our Israeli partner as they work on their hostage recovery efforts,” Pentagon Press Secretary Air Force Brig. Gen. Patrick S. Ryder said in an emailed statement. “These UAV flights began after the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas on Israel.”

The MQ-9 flights were first spotted by online flight trackers.

The Israel Defense Forces are mounting a ground offensive in Gaza in response to Hamas’ assault. Israeli forces have already cut the enclave in two by pushing across Gaza to the Mediterranean. Meanwhile, other Israeli ground forces are advancing from the north. 

The goal is to uproot Hamas, an Iranian-backed militia that also has a political wing that controls Gaza. Israel’s ground assault has been accompanied by a punishing air campaign.

The U.S. has provided precision-guided munitions, air defense systems, and ammunition to the Israelis. U.S. personnel are also advising the Israelis on hostage recovery and how to reduce the risk of civilian casualties. One of those advisors was Marine Lt. Gen. James Glynn, who was sent to Israel in October but has since returned to the U.S.

In an Oct. 31 memo obtained by Air & Space Forces Magazine, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III restricted military support for Congressional delegations and most official government travel to Israel. The decision was made because of the “unnecessary risk and undue burden such flights put on our personnel,” a defense official said.

“We, the U.S. military, are not participating in IDF target development helping them run their campaign—just to be crystal clear that it is their operation,” Ryder told reporters on Nov. 2. “That planning element is providing planning and intelligence support as it relates to hostage recovery.”

A U.S. official familiar with U.S. MQ-9 operations over Gaza declined to say whether the drones belonged to the U.S. military or a different U.S. agency. The official also declined to discuss operational details of the missions.

Over the past year, the U.S. military has used MQ-9 drones, RC-135 Rivet Joint signals intelligence aircraft, P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol and surveillance aircraft, and other ISR platforms in the Middle East. A senior administration official said there were unarmed U.S. military assets operating in the region.

According to publicly available transponder data from the flight tracking website ADS-B Exchange, a U.S. Air Force RC-135 Rivet Joint flew off the coast of Israel and Gaza in recent days.

The flight path of an aircraft with a transponder corresponding to a U.S. Air Force RC-135 flying over the eastern Mediterranean Sea in November is shown on the flight tracking website ADS-B Exchange/Screenshot

Other assets, such as the E-2D Hawkeye airborne battle management and E/A-18 Growler electronic warfare aircraft, are embarked on the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier, which is in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. 

“We’re there to support any requests necessary to ensure that U.S. forces, U.S. personnel, and U.S. interests are secure across the region,” a senior U.S. defense official told reporters on Oct. 30.

In the days following Hamas’ attack on Israel, the British government announced the deployment of P-8s as part of a package of forces meant to “deliver practical support to Israel and partners in the region.”

How the Air Force Builds Special Reconnaissance Commandos

How the Air Force Builds Special Reconnaissance Commandos

Editor’s Note: This is the second in a three-part series about Special Reconnaissance. The first story can be found here, and the third can be found here.

FORT LIBERTY N.C. – Two Airmen hid in the dark, in a small hole by the side of the road running through a pine forest. Across the road, just 80 yards away, was their target: a train station they had to monitor for 24 hours for signs of enemy movement. It was bold to creep up so close, but the small ridge line into which they had dug their hide site blocked the sight lines from deeper in the woods.

The Airmen were eventually caught by the “enemy” in this training exercise, but the inconvenient ridge made clear the need for their career field: Special Reconnaissance. SR Airmen are trained in all forms of reconnaissance, from drones and cyber warfare to crawling through swamps and peering through a sniper scope. Their mission is to provide timely and accurate intelligence to airpower planners—even if they have to sneak onto an adversary’s front lawn to get it.

“Even if you have satellite imagery, you’re not going to pick up this little hill that makes a very big difference,” said Capt. Max Krasnov, a special tactics officer and training flight commander with the 352nd Special Warfare Training Squadron. The unit is based at Pope Army Airfield, N.C., home of the SR Apprentice Course.  

“If you’re back 200 yards, you can see cars drive by, but that’s about the level of fidelity you can get,” Krasnov told Air & Space Forces Magazine. “If we need them to positively identify a guy with a mustache and a limp in his left leg, that is going to drive how bold they are about where they need to be.”

Sneaking up on a target requires its own set of skills, especially in this part of North Carolina, where the ground cover is sparse and a carpet of pine needles crunches underfoot. 

“It sounds silly, but it is a skill just knowing how to walk through the woods in a tactical manner,” Krasnov said. “If you go hunting and sit in a tree for hours, and all of a sudden a deer appears, you’re like, ‘How did that just get there? I didn’t hear it, I didn’t see it walking up.’ Someone who’s really good, it’s almost like they can do that.”

special reconnaissance
A trainee from the 352nd Special Warfare Training Squadron fast ropes out of a civilian H225 Super Puma helicopter on Mackall Army Airfield, North Carolina, Oct. 24, 2023. For some trainees, it was their first time in a helicopter. (U.S. Air Force photo by Capt. Xiaofan Liu)

Crawl, Walk, Run

By the time Airmen arrive at Pope for the SR and Combat Control Apprentice Courses, they already have been training to join special tactics for months. The pipeline starts with the special warfare candidate course, followed by the grueling special warfare assessment and selection course, both at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Tex. Part of the goal of those courses is to put candidates through intense physical training to see if they can handle the demands of the profession.  

Those who pass through assessment and selection go on to a series of schools across the country such as pre-dive swimming and water confidence, static line parachuting, freefall parachuting, and survival, evasion, resistance, and escape (SERE) training. The journey continues at the four-month apprentice course.

“The diving and jumping, that gets you to work,” Krasnov said. “This course is what you do when you get there.”

Crawl, walk, run is the name of the game. Students learn how to read a map and compass, then start navigating through the woods, a change of pace for many who have relied on GPS-enabled smartphones all their lives. They learn how to safely handle a firearm and how to shoot accurately, how to move on a battlefield and how to position themselves in a team fight. Later, they master small unit tactics, like bounding movements and ambush maneuvers.

“If you’re doing an L [-shaped ambush], you’ve got to make it an L, it can’t be, I don’t know, whatever the f— that was,” remarked one instructor after a drill. “While you’re making these big flanking movements, you’ve got to make sure you’re keeping track of where you are geographically in relation to your support-by-fire, so they can effectively support you.”

Easier said than done. Students had to yell commands through gas masks as fake artillery rounds went off around them and smoke grenades tinted the air pink and purple. An untrained observer could barely identify the camo-clad students amidst the leaves. But learning how to operate in such confused and stressful conditions is the whole objective of this course.

“Anyone can learn to program a radio—it’s not hard,” said Krasnov. “We need people who can reprogram a radio when they are cold, hungry, haven’t slept in two or three days and are in the middle of a firefight.”

special tactics
Combat controller and special tactics officer students must rescue team members from simulated capture during Tactics Field Week on July 20, 2023, in the North Carolina forests. (U.S. Air Force photo by Miriam Thurber)

Bread-and-butter

Usually about a quarter of the students at Pope aim to join SR, while the rest hope to become combat controllers (CCTs), who are experts at coordinating aircraft with ground operations. The students train on many skills together, such as land navigation and small-unit tactics, but they split up for skills specific to each career field. The SR Airmen learn the basics of weather observation, intelligence processing and reporting, surveillance and reconnaissance equipment and techniques, long-range shooting with the M110 rifle, and stalking lanes, where Airmen build ghillie suits, using grass or other forms of ground cover camouflage, and learn to move around undetected.

“It looks super cool,” said Tech Sgt. J, an SR instructor whose full name was withheld for security reasons. “And then you do it for the first time and you realize that it is miserable, especially if it’s really hot out. People don’t realize how hot ghillie suits are.”

In the stalking lanes, J explained, students have to sneak up to a truck full of instructors, close enough so they can identify the letter on a placard one of them is holding up—all while evading the trained eyes of the instructors. It is a difficult task, but an essential one for sneaking deep into enemy territory, which SR Airmen may have to do if satellites are offline or the airspace is too heavily defended for aerial surveillance.

“Even if SR Airmen use cyber or electronic warfare, they still have to get to a location the enemy doesn’t want them to be, without them knowing,” said Krasnov.

The SR students learn the basics of operating small unmanned aerial systems, starting with tiny quadcopters about the size of a dinner plate. Though easy to fly, operating them effectively in an undercover military operation requires deep understanding, such as how high to fly to remain undetected, counter-drone techniques adversaries might use to evade drones’ thermal sensors, safe operating range and timelines, and how many spare batteries to bring for a mission.

The apprentice course is really only a starting point: graduates will continue their training for another six more months at a special tactics training squadron. Advanced SR skills include operating fixed-wing drones and top-secret cyber and electronic warfare tools.

special reconnaissance
A U.S. Air Force Special Tactics operator peers through binoculars at a target during the Special Reconnaissance course near Hurlburt Field, Fla., in September. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Rose Gudex)

Best Friends

The apprentice course ends with a week-long final training exercise where CCT and SR students demonstrate the skills they learned over the past four months. The exercise often begins with students parachuting into a simulated contested environment, after which they must establish a forward operating base and pursue follow-on missions, like striking a target or capturing an airfield to land a C-130 or to airdrop troops and supplies.

The exercise gives the students a chance to practice the basics of their respective career fields: CCT students may establish and operate an airfield or call in air support, while SR students may have to sneak up on a target and gather intelligence for an ambush. The exercise ends with a 15-mile ruck march back to base.

Graduation is a hard-won moment for both students and instructors. “These students, within a year they’re going to be on team with all of the instructors’ best friends,” Krasnov said. So instructors are incentivized to do a good job. “One, the instructors want to make sure they’re not going to get their friends killed. And two, all their friends know that we are responsible for the quality of the students. So they don’t want their buddies to rag on them for producing bad students.”

Another New B-21 Photo Shows Mysterious Vertical Features

Another New B-21 Photo Shows Mysterious Vertical Features

New tail-end images of the first B-21 bomber undergoing engine runs and taxi tests outside Northrop Grumman’s facilities in Palmdale, Calif. show vertical features that have industry experts scratching their heads regarding some prominent elements.

The new photo, posted on Reddit by user Folding_White Table, shows two vertical features rising from the B-21’s upper midsection.

The two vertical armatures rise from just above the wing root of the blended wing body on both the port and starboard side, just above where the engine core or cores are likely placed. It’s unclear from the photo whether they are symmetrically positioned on the aircraft.

Based on previous photos, the vertical features are retractable.

At least one of the armatures was visible in an earlier, first view of the B-21’s aft deck, which circulated online in October. However, the angle of that photo made it hard to determine whether it was part of the aircraft or a background object.

In a Reddit post, u/Folding_White Table said the photos were taken from the intersection of 40th Avenue East and Avenue N in Palmdale, right at the fence line of Northrop Grumman’s end of Air Force Plant 42. The photographer said the spot offers a “perfect view of runway 25/7, 22/4 and Site 4,” on the closest public road to Northrop’s facilities.

Industry experts asked to comment on what the objects might be—and speaking strictly on background, given the sensitive nature of the B-21—offered a range of speculation about the verticals.

A common interpretation is that the vertical armatures are coverings for auxiliary air intakes in the open position and are extended to allow more air into the engines for ground operations.

However, two experts disputed that, saying the armatures may be too far back on the aircraft and too slender to serve that purpose efficiently. One also noted that the armatures are “unusually tall” for such a purpose and so thin that the opening they putatively cover might not be big enough to supply the necessary air.  

The verticals also appear to be triangular and pylon-shaped, rather than flat.  

Experts ruled out that the verticals are antennas or sensors, as they would ruin the B-21’s stealthy shape if extended during an operational mission. They also discounted that they are extendible “saber drains” for venting fuel, as they are too far forward, and fuel vents are typically positioned at the aircraft’s tail.

Another possibility is that the features are there to disrupt a ground-based sensor from learning something about the B-21’s radar cross-section. The stealthy F-117 and F-35 both have a removable, faceted device that makes them more visible to air traffic controllers and increases their radar cross-section. On those aircraft, the objects are removed for combat.

On the B-2, which was manifestly the design basis for the B-21, the auxiliary air intakes are set just above and aft of the intake and give the appearance of four curved paddles, with two above each intake.

Two B-2 Spirits from Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., arrive in Keflavik, Iceland to participate in a Bomber Task Force Europe operation with NATO allies, Aug. 13, 2023.
Two B-2 Spirits from Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., arrive in Keflavik, Iceland to participate in a Bomber Task Force Europe operation with NATO allies, Aug. 13, 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Heather Salazar

The B-21’s vertical armatures are also near—but outboard of—an unexplained dark feature on the surface of the aircraft on both sides of the central hump or spine. This feature is also visible in the forward-quarter of an image of the aircraft released by the Air Force. It is inboard of the engine inlets in that image—not in line with them—on the side of the spine.

In both the forward and rear-view images, this feature is rounded and apparently teardrop-shaped, and darker than the aircraft’s overall light gray paint color. It also seems to have depth, with a potential wedge-shaped shadow within.

One expert suggested the dark feature is a mechanism to disperse the large quantity of heat likely generated by the B-21’s avionics, hence its proximity to a potential bleed air feature from the engines.  

Another speculated that this darker feature could be a bleed air vent necessitated by the B-21’s serpentine inlets, which are air tunnels that conceal the engine fan blades but potentially create an airflow bottleneck ahead of the engines. The argument against this explanation is the fact that the feature isn’t in line with the likely position of the engines within the aircraft body.

As more and clearer views of the B-21 emerge through the taxi test process, the purpose of these new features may become more apparent.