Search Underway for Missing Kadena Airman

Search Underway for Missing Kadena Airman

Airmen from the 31st and 33rd Rescue Squadrons and members of the Japanese coast guard are searching for a Kadena Air Base Airman who was reported missing while surfing Nov. 22.

The Airman disappeared while surfing near Cape Hedo, the northernmost point on the Japanese island of Okinawa, at around 10 a.m. local time, according to a press release from the 18th Wing.

The Japanese coast guard searched for the Airman until dark, when the 18th Wing’s rescue squadrons took over the search effort. The search continued Nov. 23.

“We are doing everything in our power to locate our missing Airman,” Brig. Gen. Joel L. Carey, 18th Wing commander, said in the release. “We greatly appreciate the ongoing support from the Okinawan community, along with the outpouring of thoughts and prayers. Our rescue squadrons, and the entirety of Team Kadena, will continue working closely with the Japanese Coast Guard to bring our Airman home.”

Meet New DARPA Director Victoria Coleman

Meet New DARPA Director Victoria Coleman

Victoria Coleman is an outlier.

The new director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has spent most of her career outside of the Pentagon, looking in. A native of Greece, she’s one of the few foreign-born people tapped to lead the military’s secretive band of futuristic scientists. She is clear-eyed about the need to bring military software into the 21st century. And she is the third woman to lead the agency since its inception in 1958.

Coleman’s perspective will further shape an agency that already prides itself on breaking the mold.

Unlike her immediate predecessors, director Steven H. Walker and acting director Peter Highnam, Coleman didn’t come to DARPA after a long career in civil service. She took over at the agency in September following decades in academia and business.

She’s held top positions at the University of California, Berkeley’s Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society, Silicon Valley startup Atlas AI, the Wikimedia Foundation, and household names from Yahoo to Samsung.

Yet she continued to look for opportunities as a military mentor: She is a former Defense Science Board member, a founding chair of DARPA’s Microsystems Exploratory Council, and an adviser to companies like Lockheed Martin and Airbus. She also co-chaired a review panel for the Air Force’s “Science and Technology 2030” strategy that was released last year.

“I don’t think I ever had a boss that I didn’t get into trouble with for doing all this work for the DOD,” Coleman said in a Nov. 18 interview with Air Force Magazine. “Then you wake up one day, and you think, ‘Oh, if I really enjoy doing this so much,’ which I did, and ‘if it’s so meaningful to me, why don’t I just do it for a living?’”

Her arrival marks a change from DARPA’s status quo at a time when the U.S. armed forces are scrambling to deploy new technology ever faster, learn from Silicon Valley, and ensure their dominance amid economic and military competition with other world powers.

Fresh off of her first all-hands meeting with agency employees, Coleman said her No. 1 message to staff is about the importance of time.

Employees tend to cycle through DARPA after a few years, and Coleman wants program managers to make the most of that time. She’s pushing researchers to determine within months whether their efforts will succeed, so they can pivot to a new idea if they fail.

The idea of compressing and controlling time is also at the heart of new technologies DARPA wants to deliver to the military. That pairs with the Pentagon’s push to speed up the pace of combat and make decisions faster than the enemy.

“If you can confer a time advantage to our service members through processes, through tools, technologies, through systems that we enable, we give them the gift of time,” she said of leveraging things like artificial intelligence. “Then they’re able to … make [time] go faster for us or slower for us, and conversely for our adversaries.”

The new director wants to see innovation not only in the lab, but in how DARPA hands off tools to the armed forces as well. In addition to more traditional DARPA-to-service transitions, Coleman pointed to a pilot program where the agency helps startups raise U.S.-based venture capital and scale up their business. That gives small vendors the backing to mature their products and get them to market, where they can be useful to both the military and the country at large.

“DARPA is in the business of systematic changemaking, not just about discovering what the new breakthrough might be,” Coleman said. “It’s also about being there and seeing it over the line.”

Starting the week of Nov. 23, Coleman will launch a 90-day review that brings together workers from across and outside of the agency to decide DARPA’s future priorities and identify any technology gaps looming ahead. The deep dive will lead to a set of annual goals to move the organization’s myriad lofty ventures forward more holistically, she said.

But don’t think of it as Coleman’s personal strategy: “I want it to be as inclusive as possible,” she said. “We’re trying to do something that really brings the brilliance of everybody in the agency together.”

Military research and development are likely to see tough tradeoffs in response to what the Pentagon expects will be stagnant defense funding. But Coleman said DARPA is designed to be insulated against those headwinds. Even when the armed forces scale back partnerships on certain programs with DARPA, Coleman said the agency’s size gives it the autonomy to pursue its own course.

DARPA’s 200 or so employees manage a $3.5 billion portfolio—a fraction of defense research that totals tens of billions of dollars each year. Because the agency doesn’t have to trade off those dollars for daily combat expenses, maintenance costs, or other concerns in the armed forces, Coleman said DARPA should be able to stay on track despite fluctuations in federal spending.

Coleman is taking the helm in an era when the Pentagon’s push to accelerate research and development is a central piece of its global competition strategy. From hypersonic weapons to quantum computing, her challenge will be to find areas where no one else is exploring, and to anticipate how DOD’s tech priorities might evolve over the coming decades.

One area where their concerns converge is microelectronics. DOD has sounded the alarm on security threats and shortages in that sector for years as U.S. manufacturers cede ground to China.

“I feel almost that we are in a place where there’s a national emergency,” Coleman said. “Unless we act and act decisively, I think we will be jeopardizing our ability to innovate here in the United States.”

She is ushering in a new phase of DARPA’s Electronics Resurgence Initiative, an effort that began in 2017 to shore up the microelectronics sector. The agency aims to put a request for information out in December to gather ideas on how to move forward, she said.

“We will, of course, keep looking for leap-ahead capabilities, discovering compute fabrics that transcend silicon,” she said. “At the same time, we will be looking at ways of fundamentally changing the parameters of manufacturing. … It has become extraordinarily expensive to build a capability like that.”

Coleman wants to explore the role of open-source semiconductor designs, and make it easier for small labs to produce their creations in mass. She envisions a commons where academics and companies can mature their ideas before seeking venture capital to scale up.

The former artificial intelligence executive will also bring important insight into that field as it picks up steam within the DOD. She’s familiar with the data-crunching power of AI and how it could change the military’s understanding of conditions on the ground.

In one example from her firm, Atlas AI: “Our goal was to use open-source satellite imagery and marry it with state-of-the-art analytics and deep learning and be able to create insights about what is going on on the ground, in our case, in Africa. We would look at the village and it would tell you whether people had $2 a day disposable income or $5, with very high accuracy,” she said.

DOD is beginning to dig into those kinds of applications for military use through the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center and other efforts. DARPA wants to focus on a more sophisticated update to data-analysis algorithms known as “third-wave AI”: systems that not only decipher the world on their own, using the data sets they are programmed to understand, but offer courses of action as well.

Through projects like AlphaDogFight, DARPA hopes to give people confidence in what AI can and cannot do, so humans are more comfortable partnering with the software as it gets “smarter.”

“AI is really transforming the way that we are able to understand the world around us,” as well as the prospect of human-machine teaming in combat, she said.

To enjoy the fruits of those breakthroughs, though, the Defense Department needs to catch up to the private sector in software development. Flexible, fast coding is starting to take hold throughout the military, which has long relied on expensive, multiyear contracts for software with requirements that were outdated by the time a product was delivered.

Coleman joins the growing pool of former tech-sector software experts in DOD who are spearheading a different way of doing business.

The DARPA director has “lived and breathed” software development as a software engineering executive, building mobile phones and tablets at Nokia and managing billions of logins while overseeing membership at Yahoo. She hopes that perspective “will bring in a fresh pair of eyes to what the agency is doing, … meshed with a desire to serve and see our national security [science and technology] move to a different level.”

After becoming the first in her family to attend college and immigrating to the United States, Coleman wants to use her prestigious post to offer others like her the same opportunities.

“I want to make sure that we have as diverse a workforce as possible, because we are so much smarter, so much more likely to succeed if we have representation from all communities,” she said.

An agency spokesman said DARPA doesn’t have a demographic breakdown of its staff, but America’s science and technology sector heavily skews white and male.

Coleman wants to bring in the best and brightest regardless of their race, sex, or background, as well as more employees from the commercial sector and other areas of expertise. She has directed the human resources department to look at ways to make hiring more inclusive.

“If I can do this, how many other kids like me believe that they can do it, too?” she said. “There’s something magical about a country that makes opportunities like being the director of DARPA available to people like me.”

Startups Demo Cutting Edge Cybersecurity Tech in Colorado Springs

Startups Demo Cutting Edge Cybersecurity Tech in Colorado Springs

Storing data as photons in motion using ultra-wideband lasers and employing asymmetric encryption to protect a type of computer part widely used in military, aviation, and space systems were among eight cutting edge cybersecurity technologies showcased by the Space Force Accelerator Program on Nov. 19.

The virtual demonstration day was the culmination of a three-month program for eight start-ups at the Catalyst Space Accelerator in Colorado Springs, Colo.—all working on ways to secure U.S satellites and other space systems against hackers and cyberspies.

“Our advanced space systems are basically linked computers flying through space, the harshest environment known to man,” Brig. Gen. D. Jason Cothern, vice commander of the Space and Missile Systems Center, told the online audience in opening remarks.

The agile procurement models the Space Force is pursuing make it essential that, “We bake cybersecurity into our systems and not bolt it on afterwards,” he said.

The eight-company cohort spent their 12-week virtual program networking with potential customers in the Department of Defense and being educated about government acquisition processes.

“For some of these startups from the private sector, they have no background in selling to the government,” AFRL’s Capt. Keith Hudson, the government lead for the accelerator cohort, told Air Force Magazine, “This is our chance to explain all the acronyms.” So-called Sherpas—experts from big systems integrators and government agencies—work with the companies to “help them find the right partners,” Hudson said.

The Colorado accelerator, launched in January 2018, is one of several run as public-private partnerships by the Space Vehicles Directorate of the Air Force Research Laboratory. This cohort was their sixth overall, but the first one focused on cybersecurity.

LyteLoop, a startup based in Great Neck, N.Y., protects data by keeping it constantly in motion, storing it as a pattern of photons in an ultra-wideband laser beam. Its current, terrestrial-bound technology creates an artificial vacuum and bounces the laser around inside a box the same size as a conventional rack mount server unit, but using about a third the power, CEO Ohad Harlev said.

“The way we store data today is the same way we’ve been storing it for decades … Call it cloud, … call it whatever, it’s still bits stored on a hard drive,” he said. LyteLoop wants to change all that by putting its lasers into the hard vacuum of outer space. A 300-strong satellite constellation could store an unimaginably large two exabytes of data that way—if a gigabyte was the size of the earth, an exabyte would be the size of the sun.

Such a “hyperscale data center” would enjoy legal as well as technological advantages, Harlev added. Satellites are subject to the jurisdiction of the nation that launched them, but the cold, hard vacuum between them—which is where LyteLoop’s technology actually stores the data—is as bereft of law as it is of heat and light. “The laws that apply to [any] data [you store that way] are the laws that apply to the user because no one has jurisdiction over space,” Harlev said, adding he planned to start launching in three years.

Another member of the cohort, Vitro, is focused on protecting a single kind of computer part. MIL STD 1553 is a standard that defines the requirements for a bus—the part of a computer system that routes messages from one component to another. These 1553 buses are used in almost every major NATO weapons systems and every modern commercial airliner—as well as in satellites and other space systems. The standard is built for reliability, not security, and researchers have demonstrated that its vulnerabilities can be exploited. In particular, there’s no way to authenticate command and control messages—the critical traffic that does things like set coordinates for targeting, control engines, or fire weapons.

Vulnerabilities in the 1553 standard present “a clear and present danger to our warfighters and the equipment they depend on,” Vitro CEO David Goodman said in his presentation. It’s not just a theoretical problem, either. Hunting for an open source emulator—a cheap way to set up a test bed to experiment on 1553 vulnerabilities—Vitro coders found one. And noticed that the documentation was all in Russian.

“They had done exactly what we were trying to do, built a software emulator that would help them understand how the bus works” and even try out attacks, Goodman told Air Force Magazine.

Current approaches to securing the 1553 bus against such hacking attacks involve filtering all the traffic flowing to and from it through a complex, customizable computer chip called a Field Programmable Gate Array, or FPGA, Goodman explained. FPGA’s cost upwards of $20,000 each.

“We’re using $20 [worth] of commercial off-the-shelf hardware parts to create authentication for command and control messages … just filtering for the [C2] messages that are critical to the operation of remote equipment,” he said, “There are huge opportunities for cost savings.”

The company uses asymmetric encryption, in the form of a public key infrastructure. But in line with current Zero Trust principles, it doesn’t attempt to secure the messages in transit, but rather to check them when they arrive and ensure they are genuine and haven’t been tampered with. “We use PKI to secure the integrity of the data, not to secure the communications channel,” Goodman said, adding that the company’s product was at Technology Readiness Level 6, or “ready for demonstration.”

Shifting authentication to the remote equipment in the field, creates “a last line of digital defense for the warfighter,” he concluded.

Like most of the technologies showcased, Vitro didn’t set out to solve a space cyber problem, but as Hudson observed, satellites are “cyber-physical systems” that combine computers with real-world technology, just like the Internet of Things, which was Vitro’s first target market.

When it comes to cybersecurity in space, Hudson added, “There are many things that are different, but there are some things that are the same” as in terrestrial systems.

Editor’s note: This story was updated at 12:17 p.m. on Nov. 23 to correct the spelling of Vitro, one of the companies that demonstrated new technology, as well as that of LyteLoop’s CEO Ohad Harlev.

Space Systems Command to Stand Up Next Summer

Space Systems Command to Stand Up Next Summer

Military officials are in the home stretch of making decisions that will shape a future Space Systems Command, as they look to stand up the new organization by early next summer.

Space and Missile Systems Center boss Lt. Gen. John F. Thompson said Nov. 20 the Department of the Air Force will sign off on a basic structure for the new command “in the next month or so.”

Like Air Force Materiel Command, Space Systems Command is envisioned as the Space Force’s umbrella organization that will oversee the entire life cycle of satellites, radars, and other technologies from research and development to sustainment and retirement. It’s one of three Space Force field commands set to run training, operations, and acquisition.

“We’re going through a deliberative process where we have several different, realistic courses of action for the establishment and activation of … Space Systems Command,” Thompson said at the Air Force Association’s Schriever Space Futures Forum.

SMC, which has managed the space inventory for decades, will be a key piece of the budding command. Other groups that are expected to join include the Space Force’s launch enterprise, its commercial satellite communications office, parts of the Air Force Research Laboratory, and the Pentagon’s Space Development Agency. Others from across DOD can join over time as the Space Force gains control over more Army and Navy department resources.

Streamlining the space software and hardware acquisition process across myriad offices is one major thrust of the Pentagon’s recent overhaul of its space enterprise. As other groups have stood up in the last few years, SMC has flattened its own bureaucracy. It wants to avoid more red tape as they join forces, to move faster and at lower cost.

“One of our priorities is really a robust cross-mission integration effort that involves multiple organizations, so you can assume going in that the SSC will do everything it can to try and better integrate the various space integration activities across the organization,” Thompson said. “Does that involve assigning organizations to us or having a stronger council-like role for other organizations?” That’s still to be decided, he said.

“Council-like” roles could mirror the existing Program Integration Council that brings together SMC, SDA, the Air Force and Space Rapid Capabilities Offices, Missile Defense Agency, and the National Reconnaissance Office to work on command-and-control and other space-related issues. It’s unclear how SSC and the Program Integration Council would interact with the Space Acquisition Council, an oversight panel that Congress created last year with many of the same players.

“It’s going to have people that need to work together, but are responsible for different phases of space vehicle or a ground segment’s life cycle,” Thompson said of SSC. “To effectively integrate those organizations and entities across the entire space acquisition enterprise, … I’m not telling anybody, ‘hey, this is going to be easy peasy.’”

He noted that Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond and Air Force acquisition boss Will Roper want to work through a few more issues before the command plan goes to Air Force Secretary Barbara M. Barrett for approval.

“There is history, there is legacy, there is politics,” Thompson said. “There [are] money obstacles that we’re going to have to overcome to do this.”

Climate Change Will Guide How the Air Force Builds Arctic Infrastructure

Climate Change Will Guide How the Air Force Builds Arctic Infrastructure

The Defense Department must take climate change into consideration when planning critical infrastructure in the far north, officials said during a recent Alaska World Affairs Council event.

Changes in the environment have transformed Arctic ecosystems, with variations impacting current missions and long-term planning, the Air Force said in its first-ever strategy for the region. Thawing permafrost is an emerging challenge for installations, while ongoing reductions in polar ice is accelerating coastal erosion, which puts “Air and Space Forces’ already sparse infrastructure at risk,” the strategy states.

“The environment is often the greatest adversary that we face when we are undertaking operations,” and in the Arctic in particular the eduction in permafrost has destabilized hangars and runways, and impacted the “very precise tracking capabilities” the service relies on, Air Force Secretary Barbara M. Barrett said during the Nov. 19 virtual event. In the future, the service will need to take into account this continuing climate change when it builds new infrastructure, she added.

“I believe that human ingenuity is great, people can learn to live with whatever the environment provides,” she said. “But, predictability is the essential part. For us to know what to anticipate is key. And with the changes, we have to be flexible, and we have to find new ways of confronting what we thought were solved challenges.”

The rapidly changing Arctic environment has driven global interest in the region, especially with regards to emerging waterways and new access to natural resources, said Lt. Gen. David A. Krumm, commander of 11th Air Force and Alaskan Command.

The Air Force needs to allocate the right amount of resources and be predictive of what a future landscape would look like to build, sustain, “and I would say thrive, in this environment,” he said.

“That is all linked to the fact that there will be much more presence in the Arctic because accessibility is there to other nations that can sail in those international waters, and there’s just going to be a lot more things that we have to deal with and work together,” he said. “And climate change, I think, is a big factor in all that.” 

Nellis Hosts Large-Scale Test Honing Tactics, Evaluating New Tech

Nellis Hosts Large-Scale Test Honing Tactics, Evaluating New Tech

Ten USAF and Navy aircraft types trained together in a large force event on Nov. 17, which included testing several new technologies and capabilities aimed at degraded communications and contested environments.

Large Force Test Event 20.03 at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., featured the F-35, F-22, F-15E, F-16, A-10, E/A-18G, HH-60G, EC-130H, KC-46, and KC-135. The event was specifically planned to test four tactics improvement proposals, according to a Nellis release:

  • EC-130H Compass Call electronic attack versus datalinks while preserving Link 16 connections
  • Fourth- and fifth-generation suppression of enemy air defenses contracts
  • Combat search and rescue consequence and CSAR in offensive counter air with A-10s and HH-60Gs
  • Fourth- to fifth-generation and fifth- to fourth-generation electronic attack effectiveness.

“The 53rd Wing designed this LFTE to validate tactics in a contested environment, further refine electronic attack tactics using updated capabilities, and optimize large force interoperability between fourth- and fifth-gen fighters with standoff electronic attack platforms belonging to the USAF and USN,” said Maj. Theodore Ellis, director of the event and 53rd Wing weapons officer, in the release. “It is also an opportunity to investigate the best methods to mitigate risk to our CSAR forces to ensure we know how far we can go to retrieve downed aircrew without causing more losses.”

USAF also tested the F-15E Eagle Passive/Active Warning Survivability System, the F-16 APG-83 radar, and counter-tactics against enemy passive detection systems during the event, the release states.

The grand finale included 20 aircraft participating in a suppression of enemy air defenses mission while Link 16 connections were degraded.

“We owe it to the warfighter to test like we fight,” 53rd Wing Commander Col. Ryan Messer said in the release. “It is only through realistic, massed force, fully integrated, high threat density environments that we can do that, and LFTEs are essential stepping stone events as we formalize what the future of testing like we fight looks like.” 

Mideast to Missouri: 139th AW Airmen, C-130s Return from Deployment

Mideast to Missouri: 139th AW Airmen, C-130s Return from Deployment

More than 110 Airmen from the Missouri Air National Guard’s 139th Airlift Wing recently returned from a deployment to the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility.

The troops, members of the 139th Operations and Maintenance Groups, as well as two of the wing’s C-130s, were in theater from June to November, wing spokesperson Master Sgt. Michael E. Crane wrote in a Nov. 20 email to Air Force Magazine. However, the wing was unable to comment on the specific locations they deployed to because of operational security concerns.

“The Airmen provided C-130 Hercules aircraft support for Operation Inherent Resolve and Operation Resolute Support,” Crane wrote. “Aircrews flew over 2,200 sorties and transported over 1,100 passengers and 1,000 tons of cargo.”

The 139th Airlift Wing is headquartered at Rosecrans Air National Guard Base, Mo.

Barrett COVID-19 Negative After Direct Contact with Infected Lithuanian Leader

Barrett COVID-19 Negative After Direct Contact with Infected Lithuanian Leader

Air Force Secretary Barbara M. Barrett has tested negative for COVID-19 and is not quarantining even though she recently came in direct contact with Lithuanian Minister of Defense Raimundas Karoblis, who tested positive for the virus shortly after visiting the Pentagon.

However, Anthony Tata, who is performing the duties of the under secretary of defense for policy, tested positive for COVID-19 following the Nov. 13 visit and is isolating at home for two weeks, the Pentagon said in a statement released late Nov. 19. In addition to Barrett, Karoblis met with Acting Defense Secretary Christopher C. Miller, Secretary of the Navy Kenneth J. Braithwaite, and Secretary of the Army Ryan D. McCarthy. All have tested negative, and none are quarantining despite being in contact with Karoblis.

“The Department has learned much over the last 10 months of COVID, and even more recently we have recommitted to fastidiously following the CDC guidelines with respect to mitigation measures—face coverings, social distancing, contact tracing, hand washing, and virtual engagements among others,” the Pentagon said in a statement.

“As CDC COVID mitigation guidelines were followed during the acting Secretary’s bilateral meeting with the minister, as well as meetings with Mr. Tata, Acting Secretary of Defense Miller is not quarantining. Similarly, each of the service Secretaries are not quarantining based on testing and mitigation measures that were in place during the Lithuanian delegation’s visit and CDC guidelines,” the statement continued.

Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher C. Miller hosts a bilateral meeting with Lithuanian Minister of National Defense Raimundas Karoblis at the Pentagon on Nov. 13, 2020. Photo: Marvin Lynchard/Defense Department

Following the meeting with Karoblis, Miller traveled and met with officials at Fort Bragg, N.C., and aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford. The Air Force did not have any information to add to the Pentagon statement.

It is the latest COVID-19 incident in the high ranking corridors of the Pentagon. On Oct. 28, Vice Chief of Space Operations Gen. David D. Thompson tested positive for the virus and has since returned after quarantining and recovering. In early October, Coast Guard Vice Commandant Adm. Charles W. Ray and Marine Corps Assistant Commandant Gen. Gary L. Thomas tested positive, sending other members of the Joint Chiefs, including Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. and Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond into quarantine

Greece Wants F-35s So Quickly It’s Willing to Accept Used Aircraft

Greece Wants F-35s So Quickly It’s Willing to Accept Used Aircraft

Greece has formally asked the U.S. to purchase 18-24 F-35s, and it wants them so quickly it’s willing to accept ex-USAF airplanes, according to Pentagon officials and Greek press reports.

The official Letter of Request was transmitted to the Pentagon by the Greek defense ministry on Nov. 6. The request asks for the “immediate” purchase of aircraft, such that the first ones could be delivered in 2021; the document said this timeline is “crucial.”

While it’s not clear why Greece views the timing of the purchase as so critical, industry officials said it likely has to do with European Union loan guarantees that will expire in the coming months. The financing is also viewed as the reason Greece may be willing to accept used, ex-Air Force F-35s. The LOR said the sale would be affected by the speed of delivery, configuration of the aircraft, and “the repayment plan.”

Greece has publicly indicated a desire to buy F-35s since early 2019, but ongoing fiscal problems prevented a formal request. The Greek defense ministry initially said it was contemplating the purchase of 25-30 F-35s.

A defense official, speaking on background, said the Air Force has “not identified any F-35s that are excess to need,” so it’s not certain that there are any aircraft that could be made available for sale to Greece secondhand. However, the Air Force has wrestled in recent years with whether it wants to spend the money to modify its oldest training F-35s up to the current production standard. Selling the older jets and replacing them with newer models might meet the Air Force’s needs. USAF has indicated, however, that it will use some older F-35s as Aggressor aircraft.

Defense officials said the U.S. has urged Greece to buy the F-16V Block 70, the most advanced version of the F-16 now available for export. With an extensive F-16 support enterprise already in place, Greece could easily absorb that airplane at a much lower cost, but one official said there’s “a prestige factor” involved. A small batch of F-35s could also be a “force multiplier” for Greece’s other F-16s, he observed.

Turkey, an original partner on the F-35, has been drummed out of the program by the U.S. and NATO allies because of Turkey’s insistence on ordering and deploying the Russian S-400 air defense system. Industry officials speculated that F-35s completed for Turkey–but not delivered–could be offered to Greece. While the U.S. Air Force is getting some of those aircraft, others could be made available for Greece.

“You could think of them as ‘pre-owned,’ but not necessarily ‘used,’” a defense official said.      

If Greece is permitted to order brand-new F-35s, it would have to get in line: Lockheed Martin’s production capacity is spoken for through at least 2024, an industry official reported.  

The request to buy the F-35 follows Greece’s recent order of Rafale fighters from France. That sale includes six new aircraft and 12 previously flown by the French air force. France has indicated it will replace the 12 airplanes with new-build examples. The first Rafales are set to be delivered to Greece early next year.

The F-35s and Rafales would buttress a fleet of some 154 F-16s already serving in the Hellenic Air Force. While the bulk of those aircraft—about 84 airplanes—are of the Block 52 configuration, about 70 are older Block 30 and 40 models. In 2018, Lockheed Martin received a nearly $1 billion contract, along with partner Hellenic Aerospace Industries, to upgrade Greece’s F-16s with an array of new gear by 2027.