Former CENTCOM Boss Lloyd Austin to be Nominated for SECDEF

Former CENTCOM Boss Lloyd Austin to be Nominated for SECDEF

President-elect Joe Biden will nominate retired Army Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III to be his Defense Secretary, the transition team announced Dec. 8.

Austin, who left the military in 2016 as the four-star head of U.S. Central Command, would be the first-ever Black man to hold the Pentagon’s top civilian job if confirmed by the Senate. The milestone comes shortly after Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. took over as the first Black Air Force Chief of Staff, amid a reckoning on racial inequality in the military and society at large.

“With a distinguished record of military service spanning four decades, Secretary-designate Austin is a deeply experienced and highly decorated commander who has served with distinction in several of the Pentagon’s most crucial positions,” the transition team said in a release.

The former vice president got to know Austin during the Obama administration, praising his “exemplary leadership, character, and command” as a “trusted and crisis-tested” officer. Austin was the sixth African American to rise to four-star Army general, and the first to run U.S. Central Command, where he oversaw planning to take out the Islamic State group in Iraq and Syria.

“General Austin shares my profound belief that our nation is at its strongest when we lead not only by the example of our power, but by the power of our example,” Biden said. “I look forward to once again working closely with him as a trusted partner to lead our military with dignity and resolve, revitalize our alliances in the face of global threats, and ensure the safety and security of the American people.”

The President-elect penned an op-ed in The Atlantic to further explain his decision: “Austin’s many strengths and his intimate knowledge of the Department of Defense and our government are uniquely matched to the challenges and crises we face,” like handling coronavirus vaccine distribution logistics and supporting stretched-thin military members and their families.

A former vice chief of staff of the Army, Austin was also the first African-American general officer to command an Army division and corps in combat. He has received the Silver Star, two Legions of Merit, three Distinguished Service Medals, and five Defense Distinguished Service Medals.

He sits on the board of directors at defense giant Raytheon Technologies, steel manufacturer Nucor, health care services company Tenet Healthcare, and hospitality management firm Guest Services, Inc., according to his Raytheon biography. He is also a member of the board of trustees of the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Auburn University.

The announcement comes as a surprise to many in Washington who expected Michèle Flournoy, the co-founder and managing partner of WestExec Advisors as well as a former undersecretary of defense for policy, to be a shoo-in for the job. She would have been the first woman nominated to serve as Defense Secretary.

But groups like the Congressional Black Caucus reportedly pushed for more racial diversity among top cabinet positions, and Austin beat out Flournoy and other candidates like former Department of Homeland Security boss Jeh Johnson.

“This appointment reverberates throughout the history of military service and courage in United States Armed Forces,” the Congressional Black Caucus said in a release. “Black Americans have sacrificed their lives for this country in every war since the Revolutionary War. Appointing retired Gen. Lloyd Austin to a position of command and authority over the United States military, second only to the President of the United States, is historic and well-deserved.”

Flournoy congratulated Austin in her own statement, calling him “a man of deep integrity,” according to Defense News.

Because Austin left the military fewer than seven years ago, Congress will need to grant a waiver to let him serve as Defense Secretary, as it did for retired Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mattis in 2017. That lawmakers will be asked to do so again after just a few years has sparked questions about the American principle of civilian control of the military and the future of civilian-military relations.

Senate Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), indicated he is open to supporting a waiver despite commenting in 2017 that it should happen “no more than once in a generation.”

“The burden of proof is on the administration. It also comes down ultimately to the quality of the nominee,” Reed told Politico. “Gen. Austin is an outstanding officer, and I think he should have an opportunity to talk about his vision for the Department of Defense, and that, I think, is the decisive factor.”

SASC Chairman Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) also told the publication he’s never believed retired service members should have to wait seven years to be considered for the civilian job. “I would do it in a heartbeat,” he said of approving a waiver.

Others are more skeptical. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) complimented Austin’s leadership but said he is concerned about turning to recently retired generals.

“General Austin should meet with the members of the House Armed Services Committee so they can ask questions about civilian control of the military, and to be assured that General Austin is committed to this important principle and understands what he will have to do to make sure it is upheld during his tenure as Secretary of Defense,” Smith said in a release.

If Congress consents to a waiver, and the Senate gives the green light for confirmation, Austin will take over as the Defense Department balances flat budgets against lofty modernization plans, and juggles the various priorities of U.S. involvement around the world.

Part of those responsibilities will be advocating for the Air Force and Space Force as part of broader military power.

“I have served with him on numerous occasions and I have the highest regard for him as a leader,” said Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle, president and chief executive officer of the National Defense Industrial Association. Carlisle served as the four-star head of Air Combat Command while Austin oversaw the airpower-heavy wars in the Middle East.

While Austin may look similar to Mattis on paper—with “lots of time on the ground in the Middle East” and ending at CENTCOM—they bring different personalities to the role, said Michael O’Hanlon, a senior defense fellow at the Brookings Institution.

He also pointed out that Austin faces a steep learning curve when it comes to the issues behind “great power competition,” the military’s current strategy for superiority over Russia, China, and other advanced militaries.

“Mattis was famous as a reader of military history and also spent a tour leading NATO’s transformation command,” O’Hanlon said. “Austin will have to work hard to get up to speed on China, Russia, and trends in technology. The bar is high.”

Three Companies Win New Skyborg Prototyping Contracts

Three Companies Win New Skyborg Prototyping Contracts

Three companies will move on to flight experiments as part of the Air Force’s Skyborg drone program, the service said Dec. 7.

Kratos earned $37.8 million, Boeing earned $25.7 million, and General Atomics earned $14.3 million to continue on in the program, the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center said. Each contract will last two years.

The announcement indicates Northrop Grumman did not make the cut after receiving a contract to become part of the vendor pool in July.

“This award is a major step forward for our game-changing Skyborg capability—this award supporting our operational experimentation is truly where concepts become realities,” Brig. Gen. Dale R. White, program executive officer for fighters and advanced aircraft, said in the release. “We will aggressively test and fly to get this capability into the hands of our warfighters.”

The initiative seeks to field an artificial intelligence-powered aircraft that can assist fighter jets in combat, acting as a munitions truck, decoy, or surveillance plane. The unmanned systems should also be relatively inexpensive so the military can easily replace them if they are destroyed.

Skyborg is one of the Air Force’s top-priority technology development programs known as “vanguards,” which pull resources from across the service to speed their progress. Drone designs could be ready for regular operations by 2023.

Prototypes should be delivered to the Air Force by May, and flight experiments are slated to start in July. They will serve as a testbed for the software that will eventually direct their moves on the battlefield.

The Air Force has said it wants to take the best aspects from each design to create an optimal system “that adapts, orients, and decides at machine speed for a wide variety of increasingly complex mission sets.”

Air Force Magazine previously reported that USAF has considered deploying up to 10 squadrons of low-cost, attritable aircraft. They could also pair two such platforms with each F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in units known as “air dominance squadrons.”

Mach-Buster and World War II Ace, Chuck Yeager: 1923-2020

Mach-Buster and World War II Ace, Chuck Yeager: 1923-2020

Charles E. “Chuck” Yeager, iconic test pilot, World War II ace, head of the Air Force’s test pilot school, and the first man to fly faster than the speed of sound in level flight, died Dec. 7 at the age of 97.

Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown called Yeager “a leader whose innovative spirit had global impact in aviation and airpower. His legend will continue to inspire generations to push and break barriers.”

Chuck Yeager in flight school during World War II. Photo: AFA Library

Born and raised in West Virginia, Yeager enlisted in the Army in 1941, serving first as an aircraft mechanic. After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, he applied to become a “flying sergeant,” and he flew the P-39 Airacobra after winning his wings. Deployed to Europe in 1943, he was assigned to P-51 Mustangs, and shot down one German fighter before being shot down himself over France on his eighth mission.

Yeager evaded capture with the help of the French resistance, and during his time with them, helped assemble bombs. With the help of the Maquis, he made his way to Spain, making a harrowing passage over the Pyrenees and saving the life of a fellow evader, a B-17 bombardier, for which he later received the Bronze Star. From Spain he returned to England.

Chuck Yeager, fighter pilot during World War II, in front of his P-51 Mustang. Photo: Air Force Test Center History Office/courtesy

Pilots helped by the resistance were barred from flying combat again, out of fear that they would, if shot down and captured, reveal information about the underground network. Yeager appealed personally to Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, only a week after the Normandy landings, to let him return to flying combat, arguing that the Maquis was openly fighting the Germans and the no-fly policy was obsolete. Eisenhower relented, and Yeager went back to combat flying in August 1944.

It proved a good decision. Over the next five months, Yeager racked up an additional 10.5 aerial victories, including five ME-109s in one day and four FW-190s on another. He was also one of the first to shoot down a German Me-262; the first operational jet fighter. During this period he received a commission and was promoted to captain by the end of his tour in Europe. When he left the theater in January 1945, he had racked up 64 combat missions. He attributed much of his success to exceptional vision—better than 20/20, which he said gave him an edge in spotting the enemy first.

His combination of flying skills, maintenance experience, and evader status gave Yeager a choice of assignments, and he picked being a test pilot of repaired aircraft at Wright Field, Ohio. He impressed Col. Albert Boyd, head of the Aeronautical Systems Flight Test Division, who urged Yeager to study mathematics so he could advance as a test pilot. Yeager got tutoring help from other pilots. After graduating from test pilot school, Yeager was assigned to Muroc Army Air Field—now Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.—and over the next two years flew a wide variety of aircraft and tested modifications.

Capt. Charles E. Yeager stands next to the Air Force’s Bell-built X-1 supersonic research aircraft after becooming the first man to fly faster than the speed of sound in level flight on October 14, 1947. Photo: USAF

Partly at Boyd’s urging, Yeager was chosen for the Bell X-1 research aircraft program, meant to explore trans-sonic flight. Supersonic flight was an unknown, and an attempt at it had killed British pilot Geoffrey deHavilland in 1946, creating the mystique of a “sound barrier.”

On Oct. 14, 1947—despite having broken two ribs two nights before, in a riding accident—Yeager flew the X-1 to Mach 1.05 at 45,000 feet. He later described the sensation as “poking through Jell-o.” He told National Public Radio in 2011 that the X-1 experience was more a matter of “being in the right place at the right time” than of being an especially gifted pilot.

The feat was kept secret until Aviation Week revealed the event in late 1947 and it was acknowledged by the Air Force in 1948. In that year, Yeager was awarded the Collier and Mackay Trophies for the X-1 flight, and became famous enough to be featured on magazine covers.

Capt. Charles Yeager became the first man to fly faster than the speed of sound on Oct. 14, 1947, in the Bell X-1 research aircraft. Yeager named his aircraft “Glamorous Glennis” in honor of his wife. Photo: USAF via AFA Library

Yeager became the Air Force’s “go-to” test pilot. In 1953, he was picked to secretly fly and evaluate a captured North Korean MiG-15 and compare it with the Air Force’s F-86, revealing its strengths and weaknesses in the air battles then taking place. Later that year, Yeager became the first man to exceed Mach 2, flying the Bell X-1A to Mach 2.44 on Dec. 12, besting the record of Scott Crossfield in the Douglas D-558 Skyrocket. Due to inertial roll coupling—a problem never encountered before—the X-1A went out of control at about 80,000 feet, spinning violently in all three axes and causing Yeager’s helmeted head to crack the canopy. After losing 50,000 feet in altitude in under one minute, he regained control at 29,000 feet. The following year, he received the Distinguished Service Medal for the record and the airmanship demonstrated in recovering the aircraft.

Yeager returned to the operational Air Force from 1955 to 1960, commanding at the squadron and wing level, flying F-86Hs in Germany and France and the new F-100 Super Sabre at March Air Force Base, Calif. He lost command of a squadron at Aviano Air Base, Italy, after members of his unit trashed a local bar.

Then-Col. Chuck Yeager was commandant of the Air Force Test Pilot School, then known as the USAF Aerospace Research Pilot School. Photo: NASA

After attending the Air War College, he was assigned in 1962 as commander of the USAF Aerospace Research Pilot School. Although only 39, and having flown nearly every high-performance research aircraft the Air Force produced over the previous 15 years, Yeager was deemed ineligible to be an astronaut because he lacked a college degree. During his time commanding the school, he trained astronaut-bound flyers and himself flew the M2-F1 lifting body, a research forerunner of the Space Shuttle, for NASA.

In December 1963, Yeager attempted to take the NF-104—an F-104 fitted with a rocket booster engine—to 100,000 feet. But the reaction control system, which steered the aircraft in the absence of enough air for control surfaces to be effective, failed around 80,000 feet. The aircraft entered an unrecoverable spin, and he had to eject. Struck in the head by the falling ejection seat’s smoldering rocket booster, Yeager’s face and hands were burned. He avoided permanent damage to his eyes. but lost portions of two fingers. It was his final record-setting attempt.

In 1966, Yeager commanded the 405th Tactical Fighter Wing at Clark Air Base, in the Philippines, frequently doing temporary duty in Vietnam. Flying mostly the B-57 Canberra as a bomber, he accumulated 127 combat missions in that conflict. By 1968, he was the 4th Fighter Wing commander at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, N.C., flying the F-4. While there, he took his unit to South Korea during the USS Pueblo seizure.

Yeager was promoted to brigadier general in 1969. He served in a diplomatic assignment in Pakistan, was vice commander of 17th Air Force in Germany, and headed the Air Force Inspection and Safety Center from 1973 until his retirement in 1975.

Yeager returned to prominence with the publication of Tom Wolfe’s book, “The Right Stuff,” about the heyday of test flying at Edwards and the Mercury astronaut program, which featured Yeager’s exploits. Wolfe wrote that every pilot imitated Yeager’s West Virginia drawl and unflustered response to a crisis in the cockpit.

The 1983 movie version of “The Right Stuff”—in which he had a cameo role, as a bartender—made Yeager a household name, which he capitalized on with a two-part autobiography, titled “Yeager” and “Press On,” respectively, as well as TV commercial appearances promoting AC Delco car batteries.

In 1985, Brig. Gen. Chuck Yeager, right, kicked off the AFA Convention with a collection of stories from his active-duty flying days. At left is Marty Harris. Photo: Air Force Magazine

He did not rest on his aviation laurels, however. He worked as an aviation consultant and did test flight work for Northrop and Piper into the 1990s. Across his career, he flew more than 350 types of aircraft, amassing more than 18,000 flying hours. In 1986, he served as a member of the Rogers Commission, exploring the factors that led to the Challenger Space Shuttle accident.

To recognize the 50th Anniversary of the Mach 1 flight in 1997, the Air Force flew Yeager in an F-15, going supersonic at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev. There were several more similar anniversary flights, the last in 2012.

Yeager’s military decorations include the Distinguished Service Medal, the Silver Star, the Legion of Merit, two awards of the Distinguished Flying Cross, the Bronze Star, Purple Heart, 10 Air Medals, and the Air Force Commendation medal.

In 2007, retired Brig. Gen. Chuck Yeager pauses for a moment while autographing several posters at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. Photo: Mike Cassidy/USAF

Among his many other awards and honors, he received a special non-combat Congressional Medal of Honor in 1976 for his contributions to aerospace science, and was presented the Medal of Freedom by President Ronald Reagan in 1985. In 1966, he was inducted into the International Air and Space Hall of Fame, and in 1973, he was inducted into the National Aviation Hall of Fame. He also is honored by both the California and West Virginia Halls of Fame. Yeager Airport in Charleston, W.Va., is named for him, as well as a bridge in the area on Interstate 64. Senior members of the Civil Air Patrol receive the Charles E. “Chuck” Yeager Award as part of the Aerospace Education Program.

Yeager’s second wife, of 17 years, Victoria Yeager, announced his death over Twitter, citing “an incredible life well-lived” and calling him “America’s greatest pilot, and a legacy of strength, adventure, and patriotism.”

“Chuck Yeager was a true American hero whose bravery as a test pilot inspired generations who followed in his footsteps,” Air Force Association President retired Lt. Gen. Bruce “Orville” Wright said.

Space Force: Convergence of New Tech is the Real Disruptor

Space Force: Convergence of New Tech is the Real Disruptor

Technological innovations like laser communications links between satellites are driving new capabilities for American warfighters, but the real game-changing disruptions come when new technologies converge with each other, U.S. Space Force acquisition officials told an industry conference on Dec. 7.

“When I converge capabilities, that’s when I’m disruptive,” Col. Ryan Colburn, director of the Spectrum Warfare Division of the Space and Missile Systems Center, told the opening panel session of MilSatCom Digital Week.

He offered three new technological advances as examples:

  • Optical cross-links: Near-instantaneous, laser-based communications between satellites in a constellation
  • On-orbit reprogramming: Software-defined satellites that give operators the ability to upgrade satellite capabilities by updating software after its been deployed to space
  • Smaller, lighter and more powerful antennas and a distributed ground system for forces on the ground.

“Our challenge is to combine those [new] capabilities in a flexible and linked architecture,” said Colburn, as the Space Development Agency will do with its planned low Earth orbit constellation of small satellites known as the transport layer.

But as panel moderator Karen Jones of the Aerospace Corporation think tank noted, only one of those three advances—the advent of software-defined satellites—is completely novel. Both smaller antenna and optical cross-links are incremental improvements to what is already deployed on many satellite constellations.

It is the combination of those new capabilities together that creates a game-changing new capability, Colburn argued.

Optical cross links will eliminate the latency created when satellites can only exchange data via the ground system. Software-defined satellites will enable the constellation to be launched in waves, each one more advanced than the last, but all upgradeable with the latest programming. And smaller, lighter antennas on the ground mean that an increasing number of weapons systems and other tactical equipment can be equipped to receive data and even instructions

Derek M. Tournear, director of the Space Development Agency, explained how that convergence would be enabled for the transport layer by standards-based, open, modular architecture, enabling multiple vendors to build satellites that work as part of the constellation.

Tournear, the first-ever director of the new agency, is seen by many as the architect and driving force behind the extraordinary speed with which SDA is moving. Stood up in March 2019, the agency plans to conduct its first launches in 2022—breakneck speed for military space acquisitions, which traditionally takes a decade or more to get into orbit.

The agency will be buying new waves of satellites to add to the transport layer every two years after that, in what Tournear called “spiral development”—each spiral more advanced than, but still compatible with, the last. An open modular architecture is essential. “We need to ensure that not only can one spiral talk to the future generations, … but we want to have multiple providers all talk amongst themselves,” he added

SDA had defined a cross-link standard, he said, though “it wasn’t a standard that SDA came up with. It was a standard that basically industry said, ‘This is what we all can meet.’”

Having a single standard that every vendor bidding must meet, Tournear added, means “now I can have a complete constellation made up of different sets of satellites, all made by different manufacturers, but they function together as one cohesive unit.”

Congress Mandates Bigger Air Force and Increase to 225 Bombers

Congress Mandates Bigger Air Force and Increase to 225 Bombers

House and Senate Conferees require a larger Air Force in the final version of the fiscal 2021 defense policy bill, directing the service to build the 386 combat squadrons it said it needs to meet the National Defense Strategy, and specifically raising the bomber fleet to 225 aircraft, as USAF leaders and various think-tanks have suggested over the last year.

The 3,580-aircraft fleet constitutes a “moderate risk aviation force structure,” and the Air Force can only reduce the number of extant airplanes if it certifies that some of them have been damaged beyond economical repair, or that increased effectiveness, as certified by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, meets the required level of capability. The new numbers will stand through fiscal 2025.

“The conferees agree that the current quantity of Air Force combat-coded aircraft incurs a level of risk beyond moderate, and is not aligned with the National Defense Strategy,” according to the joint language. “Multiple, independent, and department-wide studies” bear out this conclusion and recommend similar levels of aircraft in order to achieve a “moderate risk” force as defined by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the “Joint Risk Analysis” manual.

The Senate set specific inventory levels in its version of the bill, while the House set only the overall number, with the conference adopting the Senate language. Both chambers must still approve the bill, and the President must sign it before the National Defense Authorization Act becomes law.

The language would put into law the Air Force’s unofficial recommendations over the last year that the bomber fleet, now at 157 aircraft, be expanded to 225 airframes, and the number of primary mission aircraft inventory—those ready to go at a moment’s notice—is not to fall below 92 airframes. These new minimums are also set through fiscal 2025.

“The long ranges, large payloads, and multi-mission capabilities of bombers are exactly the kind of attributes theater commanders need to deter aggression,” writes retired Col. Mark Gunzinger, director for future aerospace concepts and capabilities assessments at AFA’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies in the December issue of the magazine. “However, multiple studies have concluded the current bomber force cannot generate enough conventional strike sorties for a single major conflict with a peer adversary plus sustain nuclear deterrence simultaneously, and thus recommended the Air Force grow the inventory as quickly as possible … In short, a larger and more balanced mix of penetrating and standoff bombers is needed.” 

The conferees agreed the B-1 fleet, which stand at 62 airplanes overall, of which 36 are combat coded, be reduced by 12 combat-coded aircraft, to 24. The Air Force had requested the retirement of 17 B-1s, with plans to use the savings to upgrade and operate the remaining aircraft at a higher readiness level. Four B-1s that are retired to the “boneyard” at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz., are to be kept in Type 2000, or recallable storage, to ensure their parts can be used.

The conferees decided to require that a maintenance capability for the B-1 be maintained until the B-21, the Air Force’s next stealth bomber, “is fielded.”

Long-range strike with standoff weapons “will be principally conducted by the B-1 Lancer and B-52 Stratofortress bombers over the next decade,” the conference said. Members “believe it is imperative to provide a legacy bomber modernization program that is commensurate with the intended service life.”

The Air Force is to provide a “roadmap” by Feb. 1, 2021, explaining how its bomber force structure will  “meet the requirement of its long-range strike mission” under the NDS. Specifically, the Air Force is to state the total minimum number of bombers it needs and the minimum number of those to be counted as primary mission aircraft.

USAF also must explain how much of the bomber force needs to be capable of penetrating enemy air defenses, and the minimum number of bombers it requires for this mission, both overall and combat-coded. The B-1 and B-52 are deemed no longer capable of penetrating modern air defenses and are expected to be relegated to a standoff role. Specific dates are to be stated for when the Air Force would achieve all these levels of bomber inventory. USAF is to submit both a classified and publicaly releasable version of the roadmap.    

The minimum numbers of airplanes for the Air Force set by the NDAA are as follows:

Aircraft TypeNumber Required
Fighters1,680
Persistent attack remotely piloted aircraft199
Bombers225
Aerial Tankers500
Tactical Airlifters286
Strategic Airlifters284
Command and Control aircraft55
Combat Search and Rescue aircraft105
Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance aircraft30
Special Operations aircraft179
Electronic Warfare aircraft40

The conferees set 287 as the minimum number of C-130-type aircraft as the minimum total number, with 230 to be the number of primary mission aircraft available at any given time. The Secretary of the Air Force can reduce that number only if an upcoming Mobility Capability Requirements Study shows that a smaller number will suffice. Any excess are to be transferred to “an alternative flying mission.”

The conferees said they were “encouraged” by the Air Force’s efforts to find a solution for the KC-46 tanker’s remote vision system, which is preventing initial versions of the aircraft from being used as tankers. Until the solution is implemented, though, the conferees limited the Air Force to retiring eight KC-10 Extender refueling airplanes in the remainder of this year, then 12 per year for the next two years, and the remaining 26 in fiscal 2023. The Air Force can’t spend any money to retire KC-135s, either, and must maintain a fleet of 412 tankers as the primary mission aircraft inventory.

Lawmakers Call for More Answers on Military Command-and-Control Plans

Lawmakers Call for More Answers on Military Command-and-Control Plans

The Air Force has four months to figure out exactly what it wants the Advanced Battle Management System to do, as part of a proposed set of congressional oversight requirements.

ABMS is the service’s sweeping effort to connect its platforms not only as attack assets but as intelligence and communications nodes. Its ambitious goals have drawn criticism from those on Capitol Hill and federal watchdogs who say it needs more specific benchmarks. Now, the final draft of the fiscal 2021 defense policy bill wants to see those objectives in writing.

By April 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force must draw up a report on global requirements for tracking moving targets and for tactical-level command and control—missions handled by the E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System and E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System planes that are nearing retirement. ABMS was created as a more holistic approach to battle management than simply swapping older airframes for new models.

Within 60 days of creating that analysis, Congress wants the Pentagon’s Joint Requirements Oversight Council to certify that ABMS will meet the combat needs laid out in the report. The high-level council is finishing its own slate of requirements and initiatives the military will pursue to achieve joint all-domain command and control, of which ABMS is a part.

Lawmakers direct the council to then brief the congressional defense committees on the results within a month of their sign-off.

In the new bill, lawmakers push the JROC to approve requirements for JADC2 by April 1 as well. Within three months, the top generals of each military service must tell Congress whether their command-and-control efforts are compatible with that JADC2 vision.

Starting Oct. 1, 2021, and lasting three years, “the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and a senior military service representative for each of the armed forces” should brief the House and Senate Armed Services Committees on JADC2 progress each quarter.

The legislation similarly lays out extensive guardrails that will shape how the military pursues plug-and-play technology to help them communicate more fluidly.

“The conferees’ intent is to expand the use of modularity in the design of weapons systems, as well as business systems and cybersecurity systems, to more easily enable competition for upgrades as well as sustainment throughout a product’s lifecycle, while protecting the proprietary intellectual property embodied within the modules of modular systems,” lawmakers said.

They called for more tests of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency-built technology that can bridge the various software interfaces that hamper broad communication across military systems.

“Prior efforts to adopt universal standards both within and across the military services have failed to achieve comprehensive interoperability,” lawmakers said. “Adoption rates of standards invariably lag, and technology advances require changes in standards that result in backwards incompatibilities. Even if the new initiatives proposed within the DOD research and engineering community overcome these problems, incompatible interfaces will remain numerous for many years to come, hampering joint, multi-domain operations.”

Members of Congress also want more visibility into the full cost of a command-and-control overhaul. DOD’s fiscal 2022 budget request should include the expected price tag for JADC2 development and implementation for that year, a figure currently fragmented across the armed forces. The Air Force wants $3.3 billion for ABMS from 2021 through 2025 alone.

In the House and Senate’s compromise bill, released Dec. 3, lawmakers offer ABMS $216.8 million for research and development in 2021. They cut $85.5 million from the Air Force’s request for the program, citing “unjustified costs.”

Congress also proposes that the Air Force work with the Pentagon’s independent cost-projection office to set cost estimates for each type of product under ABMS, from data management to sensor integration.

“The conferees appreciate the rationale for ABMS and support the objective of comprehensive, interoperable battle management and command and control,” an explanatory report accompanying the bill said. “Better definition of anticipated ABMS capabilities and costs will focus both congressional oversight and service development and execution of the ABMS family of systems.”

The National Defense Authorization Act is expected to pass both chambers of Congress and must still earn the President’s approval to become law.

Former NRO Chief, USAF Undersecretary Peter Teets: 1942-2020

Former NRO Chief, USAF Undersecretary Peter Teets: 1942-2020

Peter B. Teets, former undersecretary and Acting Secretary of the Air Force, head of the National Reconnaissance Office, and president and chief operating officer of Lockheed Martin, died Nov. 29, 2020.

Teets, reflecting in 2012 on his term as head of the NRO, said his vision was to “bring online a new generation of collection systems” with constellations that were “more capable, reliable, and user-friendly,” while building “a true spirit of teamwork” in the national security space community.

He called the Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS), meant to detect missile launches, “the most difficult challenge I had” in the NRO position. It was made more problematic, he said, by prime contractor Lockheed Martin assuring Congress the program “was ‘on schedule and on predicted cost,’ when in fact we had no chance of executing the contract with the resources then allocated.” Ultimately, much of the program was terminated.

He believed the NRO made strides on his watch in “getting timely information to the warfighters” and improving relations with Congress. During his tenure, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld designated the Air Force the DOD’s executive agent for space. However, not long after Teets’ departure, and with no replacement named for the duration of the Bush Administration, Rumsfeld withdrew that authority to his own office.

Teets grew up in Colorado and attended the University of Colorado at Boulder and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, earning degrees in applied mathematics and business administration, respectively. He worked for the Martin Company as an engineer, rising through the company over several decades as it expanded to become Martin Marietta Corporation. He was elected president of its Space Group in 1993, and soon after the company’s 1995 merger with Lockheed Martin, became president and COO of the new Lockheed Martin Corp.

In 2001, Teets retired from Lockheed Martin and undertook the jobs of undersecretary of the Air Force and head of the National Reconnaissance Office, which at that time was a dual position under the administration of President George W. Bush. He reported not only to the Secretary of the Air Force but the Secretary of Defense and head of national intelligence.

At the end of the first term of the Bush presidency, Teets served briefly as Acting Secretary of the Air Force after the resignation of Secretary James G. Roche. Teets himself resigned from the undersecretary/NRO job in March 1995.

In retirement, Teets served on the boards of the Aerospace Corporation, Draper Laboratories, and Challenger Center of Colorado. He received AFA’s W. Stuart Symington Award in 1994, for the “greatest contribution to national defense by a civilian,” and received numerous other awards, including the Wernher von Braun Space Flight Trophy, the Robert Goddard Memorial Trophy, and the Gen. James V. Hartinger Award for contributions to military space. He was also inducted into the Colorado Space Heroes Hall of Fame.

A live-streamed memorial will be held Dec. 17 at http://www.firstprescos.org/memorial-livestream.

Combat Controller to Receive Air Force Cross

Combat Controller to Receive Air Force Cross

A special tactics combat controller will receive the Air Force Cross on Dec. 10 for his actions in a 2017 battle in Afghanistan, where he is credited with protecting more than 150 friendly forces and destroying 11 fighting positions over the course of an eight-hour fight.

Staff Sgt. Alaxey Germanovich, from the 26th Special Tactics Squadron, will receive the second-highest award for valor from Air Force Secretary Barbara M. Barrett during a ceremony at Cannon Air Force Base, N.M.

On April 8, 2017, he was attached to a team of U.S. Army Special Forces Soldiers and Afghan National Army commandos on a mission to clear a valley in Nangarhar Province. When the team was ambushed, Germanovich repeatedly exposed himself to sniper and machine gun fire, directing multiple danger close airstrikes from a nearby AC-130 gunship.

The team used all their rifle ammunition and grenades, then drew pistols to try to suppress the approaching enemy force, according to an Air Force Special Operations Command release. Germanovich directed the team to withdraw, and he carried a casualty 700 meters to a helicopter landing zone while directing close air support.

Since 2001, 11 Airmen have received the Air Force Cross for valor in combat, second only to the Medal of Honor, including 10 awards for actions in Afghanistan and one for actions as part of Operation Inherent Resolve in Iraq and Syria, according to a Pentagon tally. The Air Force Special Tactics community has received more than 50 Silver Stars, the third-highest award for valor, since 2001.

The Air Force in recent years has been reviewing its valor awards for possible upgrade, with Master Sgt. John Chapman in 2018 receiving the Medal of Honor posthumously. Air Force Special Operations Command boss Lt. Gen. James C. Slife said in September that review is winding down.

USAF Postpones PT Tests Until April, Ditches Waist Measurements

USAF Postpones PT Tests Until April, Ditches Waist Measurements

Airmen and Space Professionals don’t have to take their fitness assessments until April 2021 as a result of COVID-19, and the Department of the Air Force has empowered commanders to push those tests even further if necessary, according to a Dec. 7 release.

When testing finally resumes, however, it will look a little different. After years of debate, the Department of the Air Force is cutting waist measurements from the annual fitness assessments.

“Originally, we hoped to resume testing by January 2021,” Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass said in the release. “However, based on the number of cases nationwide, the right thing to do is focus on keeping our Airmen and their families safe. Delaying and reevaluating the PT test is the best option for our people.”

The announcement marks the department’s third such delay due to the pandemic.

Troops can login to myPers and check out “the Official Physical Assessment Due Date Matrix” on or after Dec. 8 to find out when their next PT test is due, according to the release. These dates will mainly be determined by when troops took their last test and how they scored, it added. 

The announcement comes days after three bases—Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, Washington, Joint Base Andrews, Md., and Scott Air Force Base, Ill.—announced installation-level postponements.

Say Goodbye to Tape Tests

Previously, the Air Force considered three components when assessing the overall health of an Airman: body composition, which is primarily evaluated through waist measurements, and aerobic and muscular fitness. A composite score greater than 90 with minimums met in all three categories is considered excellent, while a satisfactory rating is a composite score of 75 to 89.99 with all minimums met, according to the Air Force Instruction.  

Troops will still do the 1.5 mile run, one minute of pushups, and one minute of situps, but participants will get full points for the waist measurement section until the department can make “system changes,” the release added.

Beginning next October, the Department will still take troops’ heights and weights as part of the assessment, the release noted.

“Along with removing the waist measurement, we are also exploring alternative strength and cardio components to our current Air Force fitness assessment,” Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. said in the release. “We believe these potential test structure changes will impact Airmen in a positive way and help with a holistic approach to health and fitness standards.”

Retired Army Maj. Gen. Malcolm B. Frost, the former commanding general of the Army’s Center for Initial Military Training who now works as a senior adviser with the public affairs consulting firm kglobal, praised the tape test’s elimination as “a good step.”

Noting that the Army went back and forth between tape testing and the use of a caliper to gauge Soldier’s body fat composition, Frost said that the service is finding that “body types are so vastly different that we would actually penalize people that were incredibly fit and could pass the physical fitness test.”

“Some of those personnel had to be taped and were not passing the tape test for several very random and subjective reasons,” he said in a Dec. 7 interview. “Those may have included a tape measurement that was done by different individuals that could change the measurement each time; changes in the body based on the time of day that might effect neck or waist measurements; and the science by which the standards themselves were developed. We need to stop tape testing and start judging fitness on function, not form.”

Space Force Senior Enlisted Advisor Chief Master Sgt. Roger A. Towberman told Air Force Magazine in September the new service is considering eliminating pushups and situps completely from the test, saying planks might be a safer alternative.

“I want to talk through all those things and do it smart, get away from repetitive use injuries,” Towberman said at the time. “Your fitness is supposed to make you better prepared for work, not less prepared.”

Making Up for Lost Time

In addition, Airmen who were charged leave in order to complete COVID-19-related restrictions of movement (ROM) after Aug. 6 will get that time back, Bass wrote in a Dec. 7 Facebook post.

“Backdated to 20 Nov, Headquarters Air Force (HAF) waived any requirements that Airmen be charged leave for the duration they were on ROM,” Bass wrote.

Her post comes four days after the unofficial Air Force amn/nco/snco Facebook page published images of two apparent memos regarding the restoration of ROM-related leave that were dated Nov. 17 and 20, respectively, as well as an image of a myPers entry about the issue dated Nov. 30 in an attempt to raise awareness about the headquarters decision.

“The Department of Defense’s necessary actions to stem the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) included guidance that mandated military personnel to comply with ROM pre- and/or post- approved official and unofficial travel within, as well as to and from, the United States,” the myPers entry states. “As a result some personnel may have been charged leave during the time they were directed, or encouraged, to be in ROM.”

However, the entry notes, the ROM days are the only leave days that can be credited back.

““The restoration of leave does not authorize personnel transportation, lodging allowances, or per diem while in restriction of movement, quarantine, or self-isolation, the Department of the Air Force echoed in a Dec. 9 release. “Personnel are not authorized hardship duty pay for time in restriction of movement away from the duty station in conjunction with personal leave.”

Bass advised affected Airmen to collaborate with their squadron or unit commanders “to get a memo drafted supporting the restoration of leave,” noting that those letters should include:

  • The Airman’s name and rank
  • “Original leave number”
  • The days on which the Airman initially intended to take leave
  • The dates the ROM(s) for which they were charged leave took place

Once completed, those memos must be sent to Airmen’s local Financial Management Flights, Bass noted. She further directed Airmen to ping their leadership with questions and to consult myPers for more information.

Department of the Air Force spokesperson Holly A. Hess told Air Force Magazine the decision to restore these service members’ leave days grew out of questions from the field.

“The field requested clarification concerning the guidance in DoD Memorandum, ‘Force Health Protection Guidance (Supplement 12) – Department of Defense Guidance for Personnel travelling During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic,’ dated 6 August, concerning travel, restriction of movement requirements, and the appropriate duty status,” she wrote. “To ensure equity across the Department of the Air Force, we clarified members directed into a restriction of movement will not be charged leave.”

The Department of the Air Force doesn’t know the exact number of Airmen and Space Professionals impacted by the leave-reimbursement decision, she noted, but “any Airman or Space Professional who conducted a restriction of movement in conjunction with travel could have been affected.”

The Department of the Air Force is putting together further guidance for troops who had to take ROM-related leave before Aug. 6, she added.

Editor’s Note: This story was updated on Dec. 9 at 4:53 p.m. EST with new information from the Department of the Air Force.