Hyten: JROC Will Soon Set Joint Spectrum Requirements

Hyten: JROC Will Soon Set Joint Spectrum Requirements

In a first, the Pentagon’s Joint Requirements Oversight Council will give the services requirements they must meet to fulfill joint electromagnetic spectrum and electronic warfare demands, JROC chairman and Joint Chiefs Vice Chair Gen. John E. Hyten said Jan. 6. The requirements in electromagnetic spectrum operations will be set in spring and the services will have to explain how they’ll meet them in the April timeframe.

Speaking during a virtual event sponsored by the Association of Old Crows, Hyten said too much emphasis has been put on top-level Pentagon governance of EMSO, and not enough on the nuts and bolts.

Governance is “where everybody’s been spending their attention. It’s important, but the least important” aspect of getting the U.S. military up to speed in electronic warfare and spectrum dominance.

Hyten pointed out that the recently released EMS strategy’s goals—develop capabilities, create an EMS infrastructure, create Total Force EMS readiness, and secure partnerships in the domain—are the responsibilities of the services. The JROC’s job will be to set common standards the services will have to match, so they can all “plug into” a joint EMS capability.

The U.S. military lost its edge in electronic warfare in the first dozen years of this century, mostly because it “wasn’t challenged” and got into “bad habits,” Hyten said. It was “entirely appropriate” that Congress stepped in and ordered changes, and this was a sign the military wasn’t moving fast enough to correct its “atrophied” EMS and EW capabilities.

Though no one was “talking about great power competition” in the 2012 timeframe, it’s now part of the National Defense Strategy, Hyten noted. “But if you’re in the military, you could see that coming. It wasn’t like it’s a mystery to the world that we had great power competition coming on the scene again, and we better be ready for it. We had taken our eyes off the ball,” he observed.

“To be honest with you, I thought we’d be further along right now” in EMS “than we are. I thought, once we pointed out the obvious inside the Air Force, that the Air Force would embrace it and move quickly, and that didn’t happen. I thought the Joint Force would embrace it and move quickly. And that didn’t happen,” Hyten said. “I commend the Congress” for putting EMS on a higher footing.

“All the service … recognized the problem … and we were starting to move, [but] we weren’t moving nearly fast enough, and when that happens, our friends across the river … tend to get involved.”

Congress has given the Pentagon two years to migrate EMS and EW governance out of U.S. Strategic Command into another “entity,” and he said that will be accomplished.

Reading the language enacted in the National Defense Authorization Act, Hyten said the Pentagon has two years to establish an organization that will take over all the STRATCOM commander’s responsibilities “‘that are germane to EMSO, including advocacy for electronic warfare, providing contingency electronic warfare support for other combatant commands, and supporting combatant command joint training and planning for EMSO.’ That’s what the law tells us to do.”

But STRATCOM doesn’t have the resources now to do the EMSO/EW mission, and until it does—until it’s “fixed”—Hyten won’t approve such a transition.

“We’ve told STRATCOM, fix the problem, but we give them no resources. If we hand it off to someone new, they’ll have no resources, and we won’t fix the problem,” he asserted.

The “first thing we have to do is make STRATCOM whole, … because they are under-resourced, … undermanned, and not fully capable of performing the EMSO duties they’ve been given by the department.” When the mission moves in two years, he promised “it will be whole.” He said he’s been told by members of Congress “that we need to define what that is,” and once that’s happened, “they’ll be supportive in creating that structure.”

The “good news” on the EMSO front is that “we have had a lot of success in developing capabilities” in 2020, “in the budget cycle, and organizing effectively.” The Air Force, he noted, has “stood up its first spectrum warfare wing. That was long overdue [and] … critically important.”

Likewise, Space Force has stood up a delta—USSF’s version of a wing—“to focus on Space electronic warfare,” he added. The Army also has launched its first phase of brigades with integrated cyber and EW capabilities, and the Navy is developing its next-generation jammer pod.

“So we’re actually delivering those capabilities,” Hyten said. “Now it’s the responsibility of the Joint Force to integrate those into the battle. And that’s going to be a challenge.”

While the services are organizing, training, and equipping better, “we have a lot of work to do before we get there,” Hyten noted.

Hyten also reiterated his position that EMS and EW are not a separate fighting domain. There was a “big fight” over this in 2015, and he felt he could “argue both ways.” But now, “it’s more and more clear to me that spectrum is not its own domain.” It is part of every other domain fight—land, sea, air, space—and component commanders need to have a plan and win the EMS in their areas or the U.S. military as a whole “will fail in their mission,” he asserted.

Part of joint readiness will be creating a credible test capability; something that has “degraded in recent years,” Hyten noted.

D.C., Virginia, Maryland Guard Personnel Responding to Chaos in Capitol

D.C., Virginia, Maryland Guard Personnel Responding to Chaos in Capitol

The entire District of Columbia National Guard, along with Guard personnel from Virginia, were activated Jan. 6 after a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol building, with more violence expected across Washington, D.C., throughout the night. The same day, Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan announced a mobilization of 500 members of the Maryland National Guard “to help restore law and order” within the district, and New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy offered New Jersey National Guard support, as needed.

Acting Defense Secretary Christopher C. Miller and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley spoke with Vice President Michael R. Pence, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), after President Donald J. Trump’s supporters stormed the Capitol building. Miller’s statement did not mention any discussions with the President before the entire D.C. National Guard was activated.

“We are prepared to provide additional support as necessary and appropriate as requested by local authorities,” Miller said. “Our people are sworn to defend the constitution and our democratic form of government and they will act accordingly.”

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser initially requested about 340 National Guardsmen to help police prepare for the protests. Following the breach of the Capitol, the U.S. Capitol Police on Jan. 6 requested additional Guard support, which was approved, Army Secretary Ryan D. McCarthy told reporters during a joint press briefing with Bowser and the head of the Metropolitan Police Department. 

“Around three o’clock this afternoon, we mobilized the D.C. National Guard for 100-percent strength,” he said. “We’ll have 1,100 personnel that are convening at the Armory as we speak to support [the] Metro P.D. in reestablishing the safety at the confines of the U.S. Capitol. We’ll also be working with other federal law enforcement entities that are gonna be coming here, the Metropolitan Police Station, and add support capability as they continue deliberate planning and looking at how a clearing operation can be conducted.”

McCarthy admitted that “a lot of questions were asked” and that “a little bit of confusion” ensued while the request was deliberated. However, he said the decision to mobilize the whole DCNG was made within about 30 minutes’ time.

“This has been incredibly fluid, but I have to go through the Secretary of Defense to ultimately get the final approval to mobilize personnel, as well as to conduct operations in cooperation [and] coordination with local authorities,” he noted.

McCarthy didn’t indicate whether a deployment of Virginia National Guard troops to D.C. announced by Virginia Governor Ralph S. Northam in a Jan. 6 tweet was part of Bowser’s initial troop request or the subsequent one from the U.S. Capitol Police Department, how many VANG troops were activated, or whether Guard support from other states—in the form of troops or other assets—might be incoming.

Bowser also ordered a district-wide curfew that took effect at 6 p.m. EST on Jan. 6 and is slated to lift at 6 a.m. EST on Jan. 7.

“During the hours of the curfew, no person, other than persons designated by the Mayor, shall walk, bike, run, loiter, stand, or motor by car or other mode of transport upon any street, alley, park, or other public place within the District,” she wrote.

An undisclosed number of Airmen from the District of Columbia Air National Guard’s 113th Wing were among the initial batch of approximately 340 DCNG personnel backing up law enforcement and emergency responders in the District, a DCNG spokesperson confirmed in a Jan. 6 email to Air Force Magazine.  

“The D.C. Guard has been mobilized to provide support to federal law enforcement in the District,” Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Rath Hoffman said in a statement. “Acting Secretary Miller has been in contact with Congressional leadership, and [Army] Secretary [Ryan D.] McCarthy has been working with the D.C. government. The law enforcement response will be led by the Department of Justice.”

Bowser and D.C. Homeland Security and Emergency Management Director Christopher Rodriguez asked for the backup, and McCarthy greenlit it, DCNG wrote. The activation was slated to last through Jan. 7. 

DCNG said the troops’ taskings were slated to include:

  • Controlling crowds at Metro stations
  • Helping police close down streets at intersections to help keep pedestrian areas safe
  • Civil Support Team backup to D.C. Fire and Emergency Management Services

“Guardsmen are prepared to respond to augment the main missions, should additional personnel be required,” the release added at the time.

On the morning of Jan. 6, DCNG spokesperson Capt. Tinashe T. Machona told Air Force Magazine that none of its aviation assets would be used during the mission, and he previously told Task & Purpose that D.C. Guard personnel would be unarmed.

DCNG troops taking part in the response are also donning black vests to transparently identify themselves as U.S. troops, the DCNG release stated.

“The black identification vest is not body armor nor a tactical vest,” the release explained. “It is the traditional uniform worn by the D.C. National Guard members in multiple domestic operations including Presidential Inaugurations, the COVID-19 pandemic response, the 4th of July celebration and the ‘Anniversary March on Washington’ in the last year.”

Secretary Barrett Visits Niger, Nigeria

Secretary Barrett Visits Niger, Nigeria

Air Force Secretary Barbara M. Barrett visited Niger and Nigeria Jan. 4-5 to increase USAF cooperation with the two countries, including deliveries of new aircraft.

On Jan. 4, Barrett visited Niger, where USAF has operating bases, to participate in a ceremony for the delivery of the country’s first C-130. Since 2015, the U.S. military has provided more than $30 million to develop the Nigerien Air Force’s C-130 program, including training, spare parts, infrastructure, fuel and support equipment, according to a U.S. Embassy release. The delivery of the aircraft makes Niger the 70th country to fly the C-130.

“Standing shoulder to shoulder, the U.S. and Nigerien forces have united to advance mutual security and trust. We deeply appreciate the many ways our nations work together,” Barrett said in the release. “Today’s ceremonial delivery of Niger’s new C-130 is an important milestone in furthering our robust partnership and the interoperability of our air forces.”

The U.S. has so far trained 16 Nigerien pilots, 19 maintainers, six crew chiefs, five loadmasters, and one flight engineer, along with spending $17 million to upgrade a hangar at Air Base 201 in Agadez—the location of a USAF MQ-9 Reaper presence.

Barrett also visited Nigeria Jan. 4-5, with a key focus of the meetings on the Air Force’s plan to deliver 12 A-29 Super Tucano light attack aircraft starting this year. The Air Force plans to train 60 Nigerian pilots, instructors, and maintainers over 12 years, largely at Moody Air Force Base, Ga.

While there, Barrett visited Nigeria’s Defense Space Administration, starting the first collaboration between U.S. and Nigerian defense space personnel, according to a U.S. Embassy in Nigeria release

Airstrikes Continue Against ISIS in Iraq and Syria

Airstrikes Continue Against ISIS in Iraq and Syria

The air campaign against the Islamic State group in Iraq and Syria continues, as the U.S. withdraws forces from the region and the operation has largely fallen off the public’s radar.

Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve on Jan. 6 disclosed that throughout November 2020, the coalition conducted 14 airstrikes consisting of 34 total engagements in Iraq and Syria. In Iraq, this included 22 engagements resulting in 35 ISIS fighters killed and one weapons cache destroyed. In Syria, the coalition conducted seven strikes consisting of 12 engagements, though the results of those strikes were not disclosed.

The total marks a slight increase from the previous month’s total of 10 strikes, but is a sharp drop from previous years, according to OIR. In November 2019, the coalition conducted 153 airstrikes in support of the operation—a significant decrease from the 1,424 conducted in November 2018.

“CJTF-OIR and partner forces have liberated nearly 110,000 square kilometers (42,471 square miles) from Daesh. As a result, 7.7 million people no longer live under Daesh oppression,” the coalition said in a statement, using another term for ISIS. “CJTF-OIR remains committed to the enduring defeat of Daesh to improve conditions for peace and stability in the region and to protect all our homelands from the Daesh terrorist threat.”

From the beginning of the operation in August 2014 through November 2020, the coalition conducted a total of 34,941 strikes. The coalition also announced Jan. 6 that at least 1,410 civilians have been “unintentionally killed by coalition actions” since the operation began.

In November, the coalition completed 10 assessments of civilian casualty allegations, assessing that nine were not credible and one was a duplicate of a previous investigation. The coalition is still investigating 135 reports of alleged civilian casualties. The bulk of the allegations come from non-governmental organizations, such as Amnesty International and Airwars.

Air Forces Central Command previously released monthly roundups of airstrikes, refueling totals, and other air power data from both OIR and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel in Afghanistan. However, it stopped this practice in May 2020 after several years because of ongoing discussions with the Taliban. Since then, there is no publicly available data on the number of airstrikes in Afghanistan.

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction reported in November that the pace of strikes has increased, but no specifics were available. President Donald J. Trump in November ordered the military to reduce the number of troops on the ground in both Iraq and Afghanistan to 2,500 in each location, and military officials have said these withdrawals are on pace to meet the Jan. 15 deadline.

Air Force to Commanders: Ditch Politically Incorrect Heraldry, Honors

Air Force to Commanders: Ditch Politically Incorrect Heraldry, Honors

Air Force Secretary Barbara M. Barrett, USAF Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., and Space Force Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond have instructed commanders to review every visual symbol, turn of phrase, and other form “of unit recognition and identity” to make sure they’re in line with the Department of the Air Force’s effort to increase inclusion among its ranks.

“Commanders, at the squadron level and above, will remove any visual representation, symbols, or language derogatory to any race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, age, or disability status to ensure an inclusive and professional environment,” a Jan. 5 release from the department states.

These reviews must examine everything from unit nicknames and official sayings to emblems (both sanctioned and otherwise), including challenge coins and morale patches, and be completed “within 60 days from Dec. 23, 2020.”

The leaders said use of such wording and imagery is detrimental to “unit cohesion,” and can get in the way of readiness.

“Commanders should consider emblem and motto guidance in [Air Force Instruction 84-105, “Organizational Lineage, Honors, and Heraldry,”] and consult their historians, staff judge advocates, and equal opportunity specialists during the review,” it adds. 

The memo follows the Dec. 21 publication of The Air Force Inspector General’s Independent Racial Disparity Review, which showed widespread racial disparities within the department.

STRATCOM Welcomes Nuke Review, but Says Minuteman III Life Extension Should Not be Considered

STRATCOM Welcomes Nuke Review, but Says Minuteman III Life Extension Should Not be Considered

While the combatant command in charge of the nation’s nukes welcomes a new review of nuclear policy and a reimagining of strategy, the head of U.S. Strategic Command warned Jan. 5 that one area that could face cuts under a new administration needs to proceed as planned.

Experts have said the Air Force’s Ground Based Strategic Deterrent effort, the massive program to replace the Minuteman III missile and its command and control systems, could come under the knife as President-elect Joseph R. Biden comes into the White House and looks to find savings in the Defense Department budget. STRATCOM boss Adm. Charles A. “Chas” Richard said that though the Air Force has done “revolutionary things” in modernizing the 60-year-old Minuteman III, the missile is simply too old to extend and needs to be replaced.

“Let me be very clear: You cannot life-extend Minuteman III, alright? It is getting past the point of it’s not cost effective to life-extend Minuteman III. You’re quickly getting to the point [where] you can’t do it at all,” Richard told reporters in a virtual briefing. “… That thing is so old, in some cases, the drawings don’t exist anymore, or where we have drawings, they’re like six generations behind the industry standard.”

GBSD is being designed to face different threats than the Minuteman III system. The biggest issue is “cyber resilience,” with a modern defendable command and control system. “Just to pace the cyber threat alone, GBSD is a necessary step forward,” Richard added.

“This nation has never before had to face the prospect of two peer nuclear-capable adversaries who have to be deterred differently, and actions done to deter one have an impact on the other,” Richard said. “This is way more complicated than it used to be. This is an example of the capability we’re going to [need] to address threats like that.”

The Air Force in September announced Northrop Grumman is the sole company remaining to design the GBSD, with the award of a $13.3 billion contract. The service expects to spend about $22 billion on research and development of the program, though a Pentagon assessment estimated the cost would be at least $85 billion with the total life cycle cost reaching up to $263 billion, as the missiles are expected to last into the 2070s. The system is expected to come online in 2029 at the earliest.

The cost of the program and other nuclear modernization was a point of contention in the fiscal 2021 defense budget battle, with Democrats trying to shrink funding. The incoming Biden administration is expected to examine the costs.

Richard said he has already had meetings with the Biden transition team—the seventh transition he has seen in his time in uniform—and there will be more in the near future. He said he welcomes an “examination of the nation’s strategy” on nuclear weapons, including a review of the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review. That review is already dated because “the threat is moving so fast, … even given the time of the last NPR warrants another look at it to make sure we still endorse our strategy and have the sufficient capability to execute that strategy.”

He said the NPR is too “narrowly defined” and separated from other similar documents, such as the Missile Defense Review, a space review, and a cyber review. These studies should be combined for a “broader-based strategic review as opposed to parsing it out in pieces.”

Any change to the nation’s nuclear capability, including a reduction in GBSD, “basically is going to drive you to reimagine your strategy,” Richard said. His job will be to go back and “report what I can and I can’t do, and I’m fully prepared to do that,” he added.

How USAF’s Top Maintenance School Is Preparing for Future Fights

How USAF’s Top Maintenance School Is Preparing for Future Fights

The U.S. Air Force Advanced Maintenance and Munitions Operations School is changing the way it molds maintenance and logistics experts in response to the service’s embrace of agile combat employment and to help USAF maintain its competitive edge amid great power competition, 57th Wing Commander Brig. Gen. Michael R. Drowley said Jan. 5.

The school—which was founded in 2003 and calls the 57th Wing and Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., home—produces maintenance, munitions, and logistics experts through graduate-level coursework, and essentially serves as an equivalent institution to the U.S. Air Force Weapons School for Airmen in related Air Force career fields.

“The AMMOS school is really shifting their scan downrange right now to see what are the problems on the horizon that are gonna be rapidly approaching us here, and how do they focus their efforts appropriately?” he said during a virtual discussion with Air Force Association President retired USAF Lt. Gen. Bruce “Orville” Wright. 

Video: Air Force Association on YouTube

Drowley said this effort has three pillars:

  1.  Figuring out how to utilize and sustain fifth-generation capabilities
  2. “Logistics under fire”
  3. Operating within austere environments (since tomorrow’s fights may require Airmen to work from spots within the European or Pacific theaters that don’t come with “the most ideal basing conditions”)

To get at the third priority, he said, the school is mining lessons learned from cadre who’ve spent time at Air Force bases that helped pioneer the uses of ACE—a force-employment model that emphasizes the cultivation of multi-use Airmen, rapid deployments, and bare-bones operations—as well as the agile combat support and austere basing it demands.

“What the AMMOS team is really trying to codify is, what is the supply chain, what does this logistics look like for that, [and] what capabilities do you need in a multi-capable Airman to be able to minimize the footprint and stay agile in those type of environments?” Drowley said.

According to Drowley, this paradigm shift includes looking for opportunities to make both USAF equipment and Airmen multi-capable.

“When you look at training your maintenance team or your logistics team, are there areas where your crew chief can also do weapons load?” he said. “Are there areas where, you know, a jammer needs to be modified a little bit, so that way it can be multi-use across the board?”

The school’s cadre is currently engaged “in the tabletop exercise, red-teaming aspect of” examining ACE operations and their potential requirements to determine how to equip instructors to adequately prepare Airmen to operate in “those types of environments,” Drowley said.

“The good news is … our cadre at AMMOS are made up from those faces that have really been leading the way, and now they’re really focusing those efforts on what does that ACE look like in the future, and how will our maintainers and logisticians be able to support that?” he added.

The COVID-19 pandemic has also helped the school take stock of its processes and figure out how to step its game up, he said. This introspection has included inspecting its syllabus for potential improvements, with “future iterations” slated to be released in the near future, he said.

Lockheed Receives Up to $4.9 Billion for Next-Gen OPIR Satellites

Lockheed Receives Up to $4.9 Billion for Next-Gen OPIR Satellites

The Pentagon awarded Lockheed Martin Space up to $4.9 billion for three geosynchronous Earth-orbiting space vehicles, plus ground mission software, as part of the Overhead Persistent Infrared next-generation space-based missile warning systems.

OPIR will eventually include the three GEO satellites from Lockheed, along with two satellites in polar orbit as part of Block 0. Under the new contract, Lockheed will provide engineering support for launch vehicle integration and early on-orbit checkout for all three vehicles, according to the Jan. 4 contract announcement.

The award is a modification to a previous $2.9 billion contract from August 2018 to start work on the project. Northrop Grumman in May received up to $2.4 billion to supply the two polar satellites. Under that contract, Northrop will finish phase one development in the end of 2025, with the first satellite delivered in fiscal 2027 and all five initial satellites ready in 2029.

“The primary mission is to provide initial missile warning of a ballistic missile attack on the U.S., its deployed forces, and its allies,” the Space Force said in budget documents. “Next-Gen OPIR Space enhances detection and improves reporting of intercontinental ballistic missile launches, submarine-launched ballistic missile launches, and tactical ballistic missile launches.”

The Department of the Air Force called for $2.3 billion for development of OPIR in fiscal 2021, with research and development expected to run $14.5 billion from 2020 through 2025. The system will eventually replace the Space-Based Infrared System, also produced by Lockheed.

Snapshot: DOD and COVID-19

Snapshot: DOD and COVID-19

Number of COVID-19 cases in DOD, as of 6 a.m. EST on Jan. 4:

Cumulative CasesCumulative
Hospitalized
Cumulative
Recovered
Cumulative
Deaths
Military110,018
(+12,973)
945 (+64)72,647
(+13,179)
14
Civilian31,301
(+5,063)
895 (+96)17,053
(+3,327)
118 (+19)
Dependent17,862
(+2,500)
215 (+21)11,188 (+1,961)9
Contractor10,733
(+1,618)
326 (+39)6,397
(+1,144)
42 (+4)
Total169,914
(+22,154)
2,381 (+220)107,285
(+19,611)
183 (+23)

Editor’s Notes:

  • The Defense Department generally publishes this data three times weekly here.
  • DOD on April 16 transitioned from reporting current cases to reporting cumulative ones, stating that it believes the latter “more accurately reflects the effects of COVID-19 to our force” and pledging to “continue to refine” its reporting.
  • The deltas shown as of Jan. 4 reflect changes since Dec. 18.

Total number of COVID-19 cases among Department of the Air Force military personnel, as of 6 a.m. EST on Jan. 4:

Number of Personnel
20,197 (+2,034)

Editor’s Notes:

  • The Defense Department generally publishes this data three times weekly here.
  • This total includes Active-duty and Reserve forces in the Department of the Air Force, not the Air National Guard.
  • The delta shown as of Jan. 4 reflects the change since Dec. 18.

Total number of COVID-19 cases in the Department of the Air Force, as of 2 p.m. EST on Dec. 28:

  CasesHospitalizedRecovered Deaths
Military19,276 (+1,921)13 (-2)12,808 (+1,628)0
Civilian6,145 (+959)21 (-1)3,949 (+527)28 (+5)
Dependent5,995 (+805)8 (-5)3,882 (+494)4
Contractor1,863 (+280)3 (-4)1,138 (+155)12 (+2)
Total 33,279 (+3,965)45 (-12)21,777 (+2,804)44 (+7)

Editor’s Notes:

  • These numbers account for cases throughout the Department.
  • The military totals above include Active-duty and Reserve forces, not ANG.
  • The Air Force generally publishes this data once weekly here.
  • The deltas shown as of Dec. 28 reflect changes since Dec. 14.

COVID-19 Cases Among Air National Guard Personnel, as of Sept. 3:

Cases, Not HospitalizedCases, HospitalizedTotal Active
Cases
Total RecoveredCumulative Cases
350 (+7)3353 (+7)563 (+54)916 (+61)

Editor’s Note:

  • ANG-specific case totals aren’t included in DOD, USAF, or NGB daily COVID-19 updates.
  • Deltas shown as of Sept. 3 reflect changes since Aug. 19.

National Guard activations in support of COVID-19 response, as of Aug. 3:

Approximate Number of Personnel
24,935 (-15.8%)

Editor’s Notes:

  • This section of Snapshot will be updated as data is distributed, since updates haven’t been published regularly since July 15.
  • The increase shown here is as of the last update, which was published on July 15.