vAWS 2021: Mission Domain Live Engagement—Munitions

vAWS 2021: Mission Domain Live Engagement—Munitions

Video: Air Force Association on YouTube

Watch panelists retired Maj. Gen. Jon A. Norman, vice president of customer requirements and capabilities at Raytheon Missiles & Defense; Terri Quick, director of Air Force customer relations at Elbit Systems of America; Josh Goodman, program management lead for Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) and TurboJet at Pratt & Whitney; Dave Winebrener, senior manager of the Missile and Aviation Systems Division at Dynetics, a Leidos Company; and moderator Air Force Col. Gary A. Haase, commander and director for the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Munitions Directorate, take part in the “Mission Domain Live Engagement—Munitions” session from AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium.

vAWS 2021: Science, Technology & Innovation In Every Domain

vAWS 2021: Science, Technology & Innovation In Every Domain

Watch Air Force Materiel Command boss Gen. Arnold W. Bunch Jr.; Lt. Gen. John F. “JT” Thompson, commander of the Space and Missile Systems Center; Brig. Gen. Heather L. Pringle, commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory; Dr. Joel B. Mozer, USSF chief scientist take part in the “Science, Technology & Innovation In Every Domain” session from AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium moderated by retired Maj. Gen. Doug Raaberg, AFA executive vice president.

Watch, Read: The Guardians We Need—Transitioning into the Space Force

Watch, Read: The Guardians We Need—Transitioning into the Space Force

Watch the video or read the transcript of Gen. David D. Thompson, vice chief of space operations, United States Space Force; Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force Roger Towberman talking about “The Guardians We Need—Transitioning Into the Space Force” in a panel session moderated by AFA President, retired Lt. Gen. Bruce “Orville” Wright, during AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium.

AFA President Retired Lt. Gen. Bruce “Orville” Wright: “Establishing a new service is an incredible undertaking. And two of the Guardians who are leading the way are with us today. The Space Force was established December 20, 2019. And in just the past few months, they have transitioned to the name Guardians, introduced a new rank structure, unveiled their nine Deltas—the Space Force equivalent of wings—and they’re starting to bring personnel in from other services. We’re so pleased to welcome to our studio this morning, Gen. D. T. Thompson, vice chief of space operations, and from the Pentagon, Chief Master Sgt. of the Space Force Roger Towberman. Gentlemen, if you would please, set the scene for us. Where is the Space Force today? And where are you going over the next six to 12 months?”

Gen. David D. Thompson, vice chief of space operations: “All right, Gen. Wright. Thanks so much for that introduction, and it’s exciting and important to be here with you all today, especially joining Chief Towberman, to talk just a little bit about that. Actually we were assigned to responsibility in law over a year ago, in December of 2019, to fully establish a Space Force within 18 months, and in fact, later, Chief [of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay”] Raymond and [former] Secretary [of the Air Force Barbara M.] Barrett gave us 15 months to do it. And so over the past year, we’ve been rapidly establishing the force, we’ve been, we’ve completed the initial organizational design, we we’ve already established several of our organizations, we’ve established an early headquarters, we’ve created a Space Operations Command, we’ve got plans for acquisition and training and readiness commands, and our job over the next several months is to finish the detailed planning, actually execute on the final stages on some of that organizational stand up, and then to proceed the full requirement that’s going to take several years, of fully building out a force that we need to defend and protect space capabilities and provide those capabilities for the Space Force, for the nation, and the Joint Force well into the future.” 

Wright: “Chief Towberman?”

Chief Master Sgt. of the Space Force Roger Towberman: “Yes, Gen. Wright, it’s always great to see you, I wish I could be shaking your hand. I can’t wait until, you know, hopefully the next time we do one of these things, we can, we can all be together and be like human beings are meant to be. And, you know, hugs and high fives and all that, but thanks so much to AFA, thanks again to Tobias [Naegele] and Amy [McCullough] for, for working us through this all week. Thanks everybody for the hard work that goes into this. I think the content has been incredible, the on-demand stuff is fantastic, and for all of all our Airmen and Guardians out there that have the opportunity, and have that growth mindset that I know both, both services crave, to be able to just pick and choose and see the stuff that makes them better, makes them more aware, and all of that to be brought to them by AFA, it’s just a really, really cool week. So just thanks to everyone. Yeah, it’s been a big first year for us. We’d like to say hashtag it’s not boring. We’re running fast, things are changing every day, we spent the entire first year inventing the force, as the CSO says, and now, year two, focused on integrating the force, as we continue to bring in folks. We had another virtual transfer ceremony just last night to welcome in even more Guardians. So as the force starts to fill up, and we start to get the folks in we need, now we turn to them, and we say, help us help you. You know, be a part of your own future, and let’s see how this all fits in with each other, and in with the joint force, in with our coalition partners, and commercial and industry partners, which are so important to our continued dominance in space and unfettered access to, and freedom to maneuver. So, yeah, it’s fun. It’s not boring.”

Wright:

“Well thanks, Gen. Thompson and Chief Towberman. For all of us looking at the backgrounds and experience, the leadership tests that you’ve been through, we couldn’t have two better proven joint warfighters to lead our nation, and certainly, to lead our Space Force. Let me start with a question: the term Guardians, a bit of background on, on how you all came up with the term Guardians, but really what that term means to this important set of joint warfighters? And now, also known as Guardians, so I’ll start with you, Gen. Thompson, and then and then Chief Towberman.”

Thompson: “Sure. To be a Guardian means several things. First of all, it means provider and protector. It means over watcher, and it means warrior. It means somebody who’s trained, who’s disciplined, who’s prepared, and who provides every single day. In fact, every day the Guardian provides that overwatch allows for provision for others, but in the role of protector and warrior, is prepared at a moment’s notice to go completely into that mode, and probably most importantly, is that symbol to those who would do us harm. The understanding of what we do every single day, and if they choose to force us into the mode of protector and warrior, things will not end well for them. The term Guardian has deep heritage inside of the space community, and specifically for those of us who grew up inside the space missions inside the Air Force. Since its inception, Air Force Space Command, the motto of Air Force Space Command, was ‘Guardians of the High Frontier.’ We were Guardians in that regard, and so, just as the Air Force for many years built on its heritage and legacy of the Army Air Corps and how it grew into the U.S. Space Force, this is also a perfect connection to our past and our heritage and to remember where we’ve come from, with that connection to Air Force Space Command and its motto of Guardian to the High Frontier.”

Wright: Chief, your thoughts?”

Toowberman: “You know it’s a, it’s a cool question, and, and I think all of those things are true. And I’m a big heritage guy, I’m a big, I love military heritage, and being able to give a nod to our history, but maybe something I love, even more is, is that we don’t know what Guardian is going to mean, you know tomorrow, that this is in the hands of the culture that we’re building, and in many ways, it can mean whatever we want it to mean. And I think that that’s really kind of the cool thing, is that as we start to flesh out our values, as we turn to the force, and we say it’s your culture, it’s, it’s the headquarters’ job to set the conditions for success. It’s your job to grow within those conditions, and be the culture, and give meaning to a very powerful word with great history with great legacy. The future of that word and what it really means to be a Guardian, I mean really, to hopefully be the a word, right, that if I’m a Guardian is something that never changes. I may serve four years, I may serve 40 years, but to always be a Guardian is, and what that means moving forward, to have that in the hands of the people that are building this force is just, I think it’s really cool to me, and it’s a maybe even cooler than the history and legacy that comes with ‘Guardians of the High Frontier.” And just the powerful word that it is on its own is this concept that, what will it mean tomorrow? What do Guardians symbolize? What is that culture that’s going to grow on its own as we help to unleash the greatness in all of the folks that are raising their hands to join the team?”

Wright: “Well thanks Chief. You know, Gen. Thompson, you were getting pretty good grades earlier in your, early in your life. A degree, in fact, in astronautics from the Air Force Academy. Could you and the Chief talk a bit to those who would want to enter the Space Force, and be Guardians, what are the attributes, the backgrounds that you’re looking for?”

Thompson: “Um, I sure will. And let me start, let me start by saying this: You know, today we have over 4,100 uniformed members of the Space Force, about 150 of those have come through accession channels directly into the Space Force, whether it’s through the officer channels, or the enlisted channels, but 3,950 of us wearing the Space Force name tape today, at some point in our path, for some number of years were Airmen and part of the United States Air Force. And let me start by saying this: We have a long way to go, many things to do to build out what we expect of Guardians, but we’re starting on a tremendous foundation. First of all, those Guardians at heart, who for years were Airmen who performed space missions inside the Air Force, who, who taught us, who trained us, who meant mentored us. The things we had the opportunity to do as part of the space community and space mission areas inside of the Air Force, and the support that the Air Force provided and built us into, has provided an excellent foundation for where we need to go in, in regard to Guardians. In addition, through the support they’re provided with basic military training, and some of the education programs and other things, we’re going to continue to partner with and depend on the Air Force for many years. The Air Force has had a huge role in where we have gotten to today, and I just want to take a minute to say, express our appreciation. Now I’ll talk a little bit about what it means, we think, to be a Guardian. Certainly early on is someone who needs to be bold, someone who needs to be visionary, somebody who needs to be innovative, somebody who has a deep technical and operational understanding of the domain we operate in, which is fundamentally different from any other operating domain, who understands the threats, who understand the capabilities we provide, the importance of those capabilities, and understands when do they walk into the room with the rest of the joint force, the expectation of them, what they provide, how they’re expected to integrate, and the expertise they need to bring to everything that we need to do, that’s, that’s the idea of what a Guardian needs to be. We have a lot of work to do to understand how to get there. But that’s kind of where we stand in that regard.”

Wright: “Wonderful, Chief?”

Towberman: “Sir, you know, I’d agree 100%. And I, it really is like there’s this blue chip organization called the United States Air Force. There’s also a blue chip organization called the United States Army, and United States Navy, and the United States Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard. These are blue chip, awesome, institutions and they have developed the greatest NCO corps in history. And so, I think that’s where it starts. But I think there’s also on top of that and all those skills and talents is self, selflessness and, and desire to win, and all those things that come in all the services. But then there’s this new startup company, and I think there’s folks with a certain kind of willingness to take a little bit of a risk on a startup company, be a little bit more adventurous, be a little bit ready for something unconventional, maybe a little bit disagreeable, and so I think we want the things that everybody wants. And then there’s this other thing, right, like there’s some people that are like, yeah but this startup is pretty exciting to me. And let me invest in that, and let me give that a chance. And so, I think that is this kind of this little extra thing that we want for potential Guardians, they need to have this sense that investing in the startup is really cool, because not everybody thinks that’s really cool, right? And so, to get that kind of willingness to be bold and different, and to start with a clean sheet, that’s, that’s really exciting. The one thing that you said, too, that, I know we’re really working hard on the recruitment and, in particular on the enlisted side. You said what backgrounds they might have, and I think this is a fascinating conversation, because it is kind of normal practice to hire folks or recruit folks based on what they’ve done. And what we want to do is, is flip that a little bit, and find a way to better predict what they’re capable of, regardless of what they’ve done.In other words, if we can find a way to measure potential, presuming that we can teach you anything we need to teach you. If we can find that person that can learn, that can adjust, that can be flexible, and that is excited about serving, whether or not that kind of checks certain boxes in their past, I think that puts us in a unique position where we can target talent, diamonds in the rough, if you will, undiscovered talent. It allows us to look in different places, and I think our size and skill gives us the ability, a degree of intimacy, where we can kind of pull at that a little bit, and so I’m really excited about this concept of, yeah, yeah I’ve got it, you’ve done great things, but let’s see if we can somehow measure and predict what you’re capable of, and let’s invest in that. Let’s—both of us, right, as institution and as individual—let’s both of us decide to invest in your potential, and not just bank on your past, if that makes sense. It’s, it’s, it’s pretty cool. It’s not boring.”

Thompson: “Hey, Chief, Gen. Wright, if I can, let me, let me try to add just a little bit there. We don’t, you don’t typically want to talk about things you don’t want, but let me just say some things we can’t afford from Guardians. The first is, Guardians should not be asking for permission to do their job. In some places, in some cases, you find that, that, that culture building of, this sense of, I have to have permission to do my job. Absolutely, we cannot afford as, as young, as small, as far as we need to go, we can’t afford to have Guardians who ask for permission to do their job, number one. And number two, we can’t afford Guardians who come in with a mindset that says, ‘We have always done it this way.’ What we really need are Guardians who say, ‘Why do we do it this way,’ who ask, ‘Why do we do this this way? And why can’t we do it differently? Those are a couple of attributes we can’t afford in Guardians as we build that culture going forward.”

Wright: “Thanks. That sounds great. I’d certainly follow either one of you into a tough fight, so thanks very much. Gen. Thompson, you know you’ve been in the joint fight as an Airman, and now as a Guardian. For many years, we haven’t conducted effective combat operations, joint combat operations around the world without the Space Force being right in the middle of targeting and warning, the delivery of precision guided weapons. Our satellites, our Space Force have been there. Could you talk to us a little bit about what you’ve learned as you’ve been in the fight over the years. And what you’ve learned from your joint warfighting counterparts, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, as well as from your allied counterparts, as together you don’t just deter your threats but you take them out, on demand. And then Chief if you could follow up, that’d be great.”

Thompson: “And that’s, that’s one of those areas, general, where we can, we can really, really need to count on and learn from the entire joint force. As you said, I had the opportunity, in a couple of senses, to be in that fight, and the first was when I spent a year deployed with Air Forces Central as director of space forces. And that’s where, now, I was in that assignment as a senior colonel. Unfortunately, that was the first time in a 20-plus year career where I was deeply engaged with the rest of the joint force, where I started to understand what it meant to be a warfighter, to be a war warrior, to integrate with the rest of the joint force, to integrate with forces in other domains and other services, what it meant to plan together, to execute together, what it meant to make contracts and commitments as part of an integrated command mission team. Those are the sorts of things we can and we must learn from the rest of the joint force as we go forward. Like I said, I did that as a senior colonel, and I was one of the rare few who had that opportunity at that time. What we need to learn from the rest of the joint force are those lessons that they have learned over decades and centuries as warriors in those domains, and we have to be able to provide that very early on to all of our Guardians in their first assignment is, how do I operate as part of the joint force, how do I make commitments and contracts, how do we conduct part of the integrated campaign and integrated operations. We can also learn from them, what it means to be warriors and Airmen. Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines are warriors. What it means to be a warrior in each of those services and domains is different, but there are ideas and attributes that we can learn as we continue to build and learn and grow, and define what it means to be a warfighter whose job is to provide and protect and deliver capabilities in the space domain.”

Wright: “Outstanding. Chief, please.”

Towberman: “Yes sir. You know, on the enlisted side, I think many would have seen [Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman Ramón] Colón-López yesterday announce that a new joint enlisted PME model is being announced, and so we’ve been right there, Space Force been right there. In fact, you know, we stole a little bit of talent and borrowed, borrowed some talent, to help us develop our training ecosystem, if you will. And we’ve got some chiefs on the, on the team. One of them spent a lot of time on the Joint Staff, helping develop the joint model. So, you know, I’ve deployed a couple of times in my career, or 19. And so, certainly very, very important to me personally, professionally, and I think we’ve got the right folks in place, we certainly have a great team, kind of around the Department of Defense senior enlisted leadership team, to look at a joint model and invest in, in our Guardians, as well as, as everyone else. You know, it’s really a two-pronged effort from the service first, for ourselves. We need joint smart space warfighters, and we’re going to do everything we can to build that every step of the way. From day one, we’re talking all-domain and, and joint concepts, already in basic training now for Guardians. And so from the very, very beginning of their careers to really be embracing this, and be joint smart space warfighters is really important. We’ll also help our U.S. Space Command teammates in the joint force, all the services, build space smart joint warfighters in all, in all of their respective services. So it’s kind of a two pronged effort, and we’ll always help on that front as well. And then, you know it comes together into the joint team that has kept us ahead, and will keep us ahead, you know, moving forward, that we’ve always had. But it’s pretty exciting, I think we’ve got great, certainly on the enlisted side, we just have got a great team right now, really focused on how do we build the best joint NCO corps, senior NCO corps in history, and I couldn’t be happier about where we’re at and where we’re headed.”

Wright: “Great points. You know, and our Guardians are more and more forward deployed. Just, as Gen. Thompson talked about. We did, AFA has an air and space warfighters in action series we did, and the 7th Air Force commander and the command chief at Osan were talking about now Guardians on the peninsula, in South Korea, looking North Korea in the eye, so there’s terrific warfighting operations, joint warfighting operations, already being led and supported by Guardians, more to come it sounds like, so that’s awesome. So let’s talk a bit about the rank structure. Both of you have been very involved in a somewhat different rank structure for our Guardians. And I’m sure there’s a good deal of interest in that for our audience, so start with Gen. Thompson, and then chief, if you would.”

Thompson: “Yeah, if you don’t mind, why do I ask Chief Towberman to talk about the changes we’ve made and why we’ve made them, and then maybe I’ll add a few more thoughts. Chief?”

Towberman: “Yes, sir. So, so, you know, we’ll start with, you know, we worked through this, we did crowdsource lots and lots of ideas. And then we kind of, kind of systematically went through them, with sort of some assumptions up front. We knew we had to be credible in the joint force, but we wanted something that was built, kind of forever. And that was tricky, right? Because if you’re trying to plan for something to be relevant and sticky, if you will, 100 years from now, how do you do that? How do you guess right? And what we didn’t want to do is be the Jetsons, or the Edsel, right, and make some trendy, you know, fantasy-based guess at the future. We wanted to kind of look historically, through the lens of, hey, if something has lasted 1,000 years, it’s probably going to last 100 years. And around the world, and throughout the centuries, the same sort of ranks have shown themselves over and over again in enlisted, in enlisted forces, you know, everywhere. So we were kind of, that’s where we were. We thought, hey, this more traditional noncommissioned officer ranks is probably the way to go, where we want to be bold is in the way that we use them, the way that we grow them, the way that we manage that force. And so the specialist ranks are E1 through E4. We were very deliberate to say, hey, we’re not going to call them first, second, third class, we’re going to treat them more as, as one group, where the levels within that group are mostly in the control of the specialists. So it’s gonna take us a while to really tease this out, and how these competency-based approach to promotion works. But ideally, you know, ideally, long term what we see happening is that I come in, and when I can prove I can do x, y and z, then I get promoted. That a time-dominant model where I have to wait around regardless of what competencies I might have come in with, regardless of what competencies I might have developed faster than my peers, that I get to kind of step up when I show that I’m ready for the next level. And so we’re excited for this kind of leveling concept, and why we just are saying, hey, specialist 1, 2, 3, 4. Sergeant, our first NCO rank, the first place where institutionally we’re going to say, hey, you’re now really, truly responsible for the lives and career of other people, and by the way, their loved ones as well. We really wanted to put this strong servant rank of sergeant right there, to say, at the first level of supervision, there’s nothing more important than serving your team and their, their family and loved ones, and so from there, it looks like the Air Force, as everyone has reminded me, and that’s not because we didn’t move away from the Air Force, it’s if we walk through on a rank-by-rank, and Technical Sergeant, maybe more than any other, was where we really felt like this is what matters. We want technicians. We want technical experts. This is the definitive rank: Technical Sergeant. We’ve left the door open. If we decide to go with technical tracks, and we might. We had a conversation just this morning about what that might look like, and perhaps, if I want to kind of just spend my, my life on an ops floor, and that’s what I’m really into, and I’m really, really good at it, and I want to stay really good at it, and I don’t want to do some other things, but I want to stick around, and I want to be invested in more, then maybe we go Technical Sergeant, you know, one, two, and we step up from there, like we’re doing with the specialist ranks in the junior enlisted. So we’ve left the door open for those things, and, and we feel that we did pretty well. We’re understandable to the joint force, it’s, it’s um, it’s able to absorb us into that joint fight without confusing anyone, and, and we think we’ve given some real kind of purpose, to our junior enlisted ranks, and then to our, our first NCO ranks along the way, to really say, hey this is why you’re here, this is your reason for existing, and let’s try to help you remember that every day by the rank that you’re wearing on your sleeve, or your chest, or wherever. And insignias are, are not based, so we’re about to roll out some test rank insignias next month, we’re excited about that, to get feedback and figure out what that insignia looks like in new uniforms, and all those things coming up later in the year. So that’ll be exciting as well. I probably took all of Gen. Thompson’s time away, but there’s so much to talk about with those enlisted ranks, and we’re very proud of the way that we went.”

Thompson: “So, if I can, so let me add a little bit about, let’s say the discussion of ranks in general. Certainly those of you following the debate and discussion in the press, there were a lot of people with opinions, and ideas, and things they thought were important about ranks, personal opinion, and I’m gonna say very frankly, I think that that discussion and the idea that there was going to be some deep and significant cultural impact of the Space Force in a general discussion of what ranks should be was way over emphasized, and, frankly, not particularly supported in analysis. If you think about it, if you think about it, people connect first with their service, right, a Marine doesn’t tell you that they spent their career as a captain or a corporal, they say they were a Marine. We talked about a culture of Airmen in the in the Air Force in the past, we’re talking about building Guardians. The next thing they connect to, oftentimes, is their mission area, whether you’re a seal, or you’re a cyber warrior, or you’re in intel, we connect with our missions and, and the things that we do, which includes all ranks. And so, that’s critically important. Then, finally, this idea that because we’re going to change the rank structure, somehow, some sort of cultural significance is going to be imbued from what’s happened in the past in another service just didn’t seem to have any basis in in analysis. So I think the most important thing in that regard was we made changes that were important that we need to make, and now it’s important for us to build the culture based on our service, based on our mission capabilities, and what we call each other in terms of ranks, and what it means will naturally evolve.”

Wright: “Thanks, sir. If I could summarize, it sounds like no matter what, you’re all about fighting and winning in the space domain.”

Thompson: “I think… in face, the best analysis was done by a brand new second lieutenant who graduated from the Air Force Academy back in 2020, who said, you know I don’t really care what rank you call me. I want to get after fighting the war and winning in space.”

Wright: “Let me talk a little bit about, as much as you can, the reality of the threat. The Space Force was established because of growing recognition that space was no longer a sanctuary. So, two experts here to share with our audience, as much as you can, the unclassified level, the reality of the threat to what, certainly our military and, and much of society has become dependent on, including GPS for example, that we can’t take for granted.”

Thompson: “So, that that is, that is in fact the case. And while the Space Forces now less than 18 months old, right, we’re approaching our 15-month birthday. The reality of the threat and what we needed to do about it has existed for a long time. In fact, it became a stark reality for the leaders of the nation as far back as 2014, when the administration at the time said, ‘We have a serious threat. This is a warfighting domain. We need to address that threat.’ The activities that began through, carried into the last administration and is now carried into the new administration, is an acknowledgement by the national, our national leaders of all parties and all branches of service, that it is something that we need to be prepared to address, not because we choose or want a war in space, but because our adversaries have gone in that direction. They’re threatening our capabilities in the domain. We have to protect them, because if we don’t, the implications to the terrestrial, for the Soldiers, the Sailors, the Airmen, and the Marines on the ground, to their mothers and fathers, to the security of the nation and the American people, means that we put our forces and our nation at extreme risk if we don’t address this threat. And so, the threat to GPS, the threat to the other satellites. The threat to the forces, because they’re under the surveillance of adversaries, space systems, is now so acute that establishing force is imperative. And here we have an opportunity. The nation responds to crisis in a tremendous way. We now have the opportunity to do two things: First, either be ready when the crisis ensues, rather than responding, or more significantly and more, more importantly, I think, prevent the crisis from occurring. Deterring the crisis, because nations see that we’re ready, we’re prepared, and that they cannot expect success by beginning or extending a war in space.”

Wright: “Chief, to add?”

Towberman: “How, how can I add to that? That was fantastic. I stand down. That is, that is perfect.”

Wright: “Well let’s talk just a minute about space as the digital service. Some people understand that, a lot of us don’t. So if you could break down what it means to be a digital service, so that it’s, for our audience, it could really be helpful, and I know I know you all came, we’re talking to the experts, so.” 

Thompson: “Well, since I stole the last question, Chief, you start, and maybe I have to say what else can I saw when we’re done.”

Towberman: “You know, you know, I’ll be honest, we are still kind of working through exactly what does that mean. We know that it means a couple things. One, it means that we’ll all be enabled, that there will be a degree of literacy, if you will, digital literacy across the entire force. And we’ve already gone after some licenses that are available to all Guardians, so that they can grow and become digitally literate, so that, so that they have X amount of capability, which will put us at X amount more than, than most people. On top of that, however, we also know we need some true, true digital, digital fluency or proficiency of some. And so we’re working through what that looks like, and how do we bring kind of elite programming skills and elite digital talent across the force. How do we train it, how do we incentivize it, how do we use it so that, so that we can have these sort of super coders, as we call them, make a real difference in real time, across all of our mission sets. And so we’re not quite 100% got that figured out yet, but no mistake that the CSO, this is where he wants to go. We’re excited to go there, we think there’s all kinds of opportunity, and I think we’ll know when we, when we, you know we had a conversation once on a visit with a very important company in the space business, and we were talking about digital engineering, and one of the engineers quipped, he said, ‘You mean engineering?’ I think we’ll have this digital service correct when we stop saying digital Space Force and someone just says, Oh, you mean the Space Force? That’s when we know we will have cracked the code, when everybody knows that everything we do is digitally enabled, is digitally supported, and is digitally, the digital limits are really the only limits that we have. So as we kind of wrap our heads and our imaginations around the endless things that we can do, I think in cyberspace, like that’s, that’s gonna be the secret. When it stops being a thing, and it’s just this ubiquitous reality of the Space Force, and then we will have completed our transformation.”

Thompson: “The chief is exactly right. This isn’t about the future. Digital is about the reality today. And I’ll be frank, for people like me, I tell my staff all the time, I’m a digital dinosaur and digital for me is a bolt on. But again, if you think to the past and 100 years ago, as both the airplane and armor were capabilities, those, those armed services and those military professionals who sought, who understood it, who knew what they had to do, and quickly adapted and integrated those into military operations, saw success in the 20th century. Those that did not did so at their peril. This is sort of an element of, if we don’t build this service, and everything we do on this platform and this approach, we, we threaten ourselves with, with obsolescence and irrelevance. And we have the opportunity from the start, to, to do things on a digital basis, and as, as the chief said, stop, someday not be called the digital Space Force, just be called Space Force, and it’s understood what it means from a digital standpoint.”

Wright: “Great. The two of you are so smart that you can explain it so I can understand, so thank you. Let’s talk a bit about your partnership with industry over the years. Building and flying satellites is complex, it’s complex in the technology, usually leading-edge technology, and it certainly requires a level of, level of engineering skill that has to come from a partnership with industry. If you all could, could talk a bit more about the importance of the industry partnership, what you expect from industry, and oh by the way, we’re getting into the requirement for readiness. How do we sustain readiness across our Space Force capabilities?”

Thompson: “Yeah, so this is yet another area where we’ve done things in the past, we know how to work effectively with industry in the past, but if there’s not just a desire to, to, perhaps, evolve that relationship but, but imperative. For, for several reasons. First of all, there’s tremendous energy, innovation, and, frankly, investment in the commercial side of space these days. Space in many way, in many ways, the commercial industry as, as innovative in producing new ideas for capabilities, for utilization, for architectures, for technology, that what we need to do is partner with them, understand that, and where it makes sense, either leverage directly, or adapt what they’re doing to our force structure. And right now I would tell you, honestly, we don’t know 100% exactly what that means. I will tell you, we absolutely know and understand that part of that is the deep need to change and adapt our acquisition approach, and how we acquire space systems. I know we’ve had an imperative from Congress, and we’ve been working both with the Department of Defense and the administration and Congress in how to adapt that system. But what we really need, and we’re looking forward to in our engagement when it comes to designing forces, to creating architectures, is, how should our relationship with industry change in the future, and that’s a two-sided discussion. It probably involves not only a deeper level of interaction, in terms of helping us, in terms of ideas on architectures and capabilities and design, but also perhaps a different relationship in terms of the flow of people and expertise back and forth between industry and into the Space Force. I think that’s a part of the deep understanding of the technologies and the capabilities and the domain that we’re going to have to have as a force to be able to adapt.”

Wright: “Chief, thoughts?”

Towberman: “We haven’t yet decided what our core values might be. But in all of these conversations, a recurring theme is a theme of teamwork, of connectedness, of collaboration. This inclusiveness that we feel is, is in the DNA of every Guardian and in the DNA of the Space Force. And so whatever that looks like going forward, I expect that that teamwork, that inclusive nature, that really is part of who we are, extends the industry, that extends to our coalition partners, extends to commercial partners, extends across the joint force, extends to our civilians and our uniform folks. Like we really, I think, however this plays out, we’re going to do it well, because it’s going to be what defines us, one of the many things that defines us as a service, is that we get collaboration, we get teamwork from day one. It is who we are, something we can’t live without. And so, I think, however this plays out, and we need, you know, time and we need help to figure it out fully. But I think when, when collaboration is, is the oxygen that you breathe, that you can expect that it’s gonna be, it’s gonna work out pretty well in the end.”

Thompson: “We as, as uniformed members, we enjoy the great appreciation of the American people. They, I can’t tell you, you know, how often it is you’re out in public in uniform, people just thank you for what you do. And so on. So many times, you know, people understand and recognize and thank us for our contributing, contribution to national security. Oftentimes, the civilian members of the force don’t get enough credit. And oftentimes, the, both the defense industry as it exists today, and even the commercial industry, and others, don’t get the appreciation they deserve for their contribution to national security, not just day by day, but how they keep us fresh in the future, and so I think part of this is, we need an appreciation of them, and our advocates and support and those, and an opportunity here to say, not only do we need them and partner with them today, and they are key to our future, but it’s our opportunity to tell them: Thank you for what you do, for your role in national security.”

Wright: “Thanks, we have one minute to go. Gen. Thompson, huge audience out there, a cross section from Congress, to those community partners that are around your deltas, supporting your deltas, a lot of opportunity and need for public support and education. So, do you have an ask for the audience?”

Thompson: “I do. Yes, thanks. And that really is it, it really is that that public education piece, is to help us to continue to sell the message of the things that we do, the capabilities we’re providing, the importance. We’re such a small force, but we punch so far above our weight, we need the, those who understand what space is and what, what it does, to connect with the American people, and help them understand. They may have had an Airman, a Soldier, Sailor, or Marine somewhere in their past who they connected with and they understand. We are so small, most people have never met a Guardian. So for all of you out there who understand who we are and what we do, help us with that education, so that the American people truly understand the importance to national defense.” 

Wright: “Well, super. Gen. Thompson and Chief Towberman, we can’t thank you enough. This was just outstanding, and on our nation so fortunate to have you in your leadership roles at this critical time in our nation’s history. Semper Supra. And we’ll be right back with Amy and Tobias.”

Watch, Read: Enlisted Leaders: Leading in a Time of Change

Watch, Read: Enlisted Leaders: Leading in a Time of Change

Watch the video or read the transcript of SEAC Ramón Colón-López, Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass; and Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force Roger Towberman talking about “Leading in a Time of Change” during a panel discussion moderated by retired CMSAF Gerald R. Murray, AFA Chairman, during AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium.

Gerald R. Murray, AFA Chairman and CMSAF No. 14: “Now, it’s my special pleasure to introduce our first panel of this symposium, coming to us live from the Pentagon. Please welcome, the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Chief Master Sergeant Ramón Colón-López, the Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force, Chief Master Sergeant JoAnne Bass, and Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force—the first Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force, Roger “Toby” Towberman. Today, they’ll be discuss, they’ll discuss leading in a time of change, they’ll share insights and experience in driving change and setting priorities and direction in their respective areas of responsibility. So chiefs, let’s get started. Chief Bass, how about you provide the first opening remarks?”

Chief Master Sergeant JoAnne S. Bass: “Alrighty. Well, as always, No. 14, it’s so great to see you. Look forward to all of the engagements that AFA is going to have this week when it comes to accelerating change. Also good to be with my two brothers CZ and Toby, fun with that. So, you know, we’ve been in the seat for about, close to seven months for me. It’s been a whirlwind. I feel like it was just yesterday that we were sitting here at AFA, about six months ago as well. We’ve been very focused on accelerating change or lose, what my boss, the strategic approach that my boss pushed out when he got into the seat. We’ve been focused on the four action orders that we’re getting after, and we’ve been focused on, people, readiness, and culture. We’re excited to talk about those things. I’ve just started getting out, COVID permitting, to a few of our bases to hear and listen and share with our Airmen, and I look forward to sharing with you today.”

Murray: “Great, thank you so much, Chief Bass. All right, CZ. Chief Master Sgt. Colón-López.”

Chief Master Sgt. Ramón Colón-López, senior enlisted advisor to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: “Thank you, No. 14, and it’s always a pleasure and an honor to be, to be with you. Also a pleasure and an honor to be with Jo and Toby again, part of this panel. AFA, thank you so much for this opportunity to have the three of us talking to the force about some of the actions that were taken, and also some of the initiatives that are driven by their feedback, which is the most important thing. To our Airmen and our families, Janet and I always have you in the forefront, and always know that the purpose and the reason that I’m here is to be your voice for the Total Force, not just the Airmen, in collaboration with Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Bass and Chief Towberman. And lastly, to our partners and allies, you know, our strength is in the collaboration of our wartime capabilities, and not a day goes by that we take you for granted, or that we disregard the contributions that you have made, side by side by us, in war and peace. Since December of 1990, this has been a pretty interesting journey. When I graduated basic training, I needed direction. Then in October of 1996 is when my purpose as a human being and as an Airman was defined, when I graduated pararescue school. But then in December of 2019, I was given an alternate, an ultimate opportunity to make a difference for the Total Force, and that difference comes in the form of being your voice, speaking to the highest of authorities to make sure that we do not get it wrong when it comes to taking care of you and your families. So again, thank you so much for this opportunity, and I’m honored to be part of this panel.”

Murray: “Thank you, Chief. All right, Chief Towberman, over to you.

Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force Roger Towberman: “Hey Chief, thank you so much, Chief Murray. Thanks AFA. Thanks to my great teammates, you know, SEAC and, and CMSAF and I have kind of grown up together, and so it’s always fun to talk, and great to be here. I know we all wish we could be sitting in the same room, with you, Chief Murray, but, man, what a, what a really cool thing. And really, a special thanks to AFA starting out this week with us sends a really strong message to the fine enlisted men and women out there in all services, and, boy oh boy do they deserve it. The backbone of our military, and so to start out, it’s an honor. I know for all three of us, but also just really cool and so thanks, thanks for doing that. Thanks to Tobias [Naegele] and Amy [McCullough] for anchoring this all week. Thanks to everybody for tuning in. We really appreciate you, appreciate you including Guardians and being an AFA that’s focused on being relevant to everyone, so all the thanks out of the way, and look forward to having a conversation. This is going to be fun.”

Murray: “All right. Well, thank you. Like you, I wish I was either there with you, or you here with me, or that we were all in person for this, as we continue to make sure that we keep each other safe and, and others as well. Well I appreciate also that y’all are willing to take a few questions, you know, and with the discussion there, too. So with that, you know, I’d like to probably delve into a little bit about your philosophy of leadership, and perhaps across your career and then especially of where you’re at right now. So to the SEAC, you know, which also a first. You’re the first senior enlisted leader from the Air Force to hold the position, now, now, as the Senior Enlisted Advisor the Chairman. So chief, explore a little bit about what your philosophy in the joint environment is, and does it differ from, your service, you know, specific environment that you came from?”

Colón-López: “Thanks, Chief. And my philosophy really hasn’t changed much from my Air Force time, now to being a joint entity. And I will say that the overarching theme has always been the same: collaboration without encroachment. And let me, let me explain what I mean. I see myself as a sensor, a synchronizer, and an integrator for the Total Force, and a lot of that comes with understanding the issues that are exclusive to the services. I have counterparts across the services, like Toby and Jo as an example. But the one thing that we’re in the habit of doing is always getting around a table to discuss the issues, find the connective tissue between those particular items, and then come up with the best solutions. You earlier mentioned, Chief, that AFA’s all about loud … and consistent messaging. Well, this forum is no different. That is exactly how we carry on our daily duties, and the way that we execute the request from the force. And I will tell you that, you know, everything that we do is with one ultimate goal, and that is to influence and to energize a force to take the right course of action and make a difference for our service and the Department of Defense. And that is really the essence of my leadership philosophy.”

Murray: “Great. All right, Chief Bass, Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Bass, Jo, similar question. You know your philosophy throughout your career, and now that you are the most senior enlisted leader for our Air Force has it changed? Or, you know, what has been your culminating philosophy?”

Bass: “All right, well, you know, mine’s a little bit more simpler, and I took my life lessons from my mom, believe it or not. But, but she really taught me, as did my dad, he’s gonna call me up later and say you didn’t mention me right up front, but anyway, but really my mom, which is do your job and do it well, and that has been kind of my life philosophy, if you will. As a young Airman, do your job, do it well. And as I’ve grown into every position and every responsibility that I’ve had, the job jar has grown. And so doing your job and doing it well has just continued to grow, even into this seat, you know. My, my own personal philosophy and task to myself is, ‘Hey Jo, you got to do your job and do it well.’ And now it includes almost 700,000 Airmen and their families that I’ve got to make sure and take that responsibility, and like the SEAC said, our service members and their families and our service, and the entire Department of Defense is really what’s at mind when it, when we look at how do we do our job and do it well.”

Murray: “Great. Thank you Chief. And Chief Towberman, your leadership philosophy through your career, and has the creation of the new U.S. Space Force caused you to adjust in any way?

Towberman: “Yeah, so, you know, I’ll tell you, it hasn’t caused me to adjust. It has absolutely, I think has, I think everyone would agree, certainly standing up a new service though it’s, it’s, I mean, the buck stops here. Like, you really have to kind of commit to that philosophy and, and check yourself to make sure that, that you’re living the life that you need to live, because there’s no, there’s no safety net. There’s no one else to, to kind of look to and, and so I think, you know, my philosophy that I grew up in 29-plus years in the Air Force, to be, to be a, to be a voice to those without a voice, and to be a champion for, you know, for the real weapon system, which lives and breathes, and so to take those issues, to make the mission easier, to make the mission more effective for the human beings that have to execute it, has always been kind of how I saw my role. And that has evolved. I’ve gotten better at it, hopefully gotten better at it over the years, but now to be standing up a service, and really have to really, really think through that every single day, to go, ‘Am I doing enough? Are we doing enough? Are we putting those human beings first? Are we remembering that nothing happens without their blood and sweat and their significant capability and contribution?’ So I would say nothing’s really changed, except the heat gets turned up as you, as you move up the ladder.”

Murray: “Great. Thanks, Chief. The second question deals with the Total Force fitness resilience, and putting people first. Chief Bass, you mentioned that in your opening comments, of the importance of caring for people, you know, of course, I want to say that’s always been the most, the most important thing for us. But what is the Air Force doing to put people first, and has there been any shift in the efforts recently?”

Bass: “Yeah, I don’t know that there’s been a shift in the efforts. What I will say is, as you said, it’s always been people first, and so when I, when I got into the seat and we thought very deliberately about what were my focus areas going to, going to be, they were going to be people, readiness, and culture. And then when you look at, as I mentioned, Gen. Brown’s four action orders, Airman is the first one, action order A, and so we are very, being very deliberate and thoughtful in how do we recruit people into the world’s greatest Air Force, and once those people are recruited into our Air Force, we’re being very thoughtful. And, in the 21st century, how are we training them, educating them, developing them to be that, the Airman that we need. And then I’ll tell you, I’ve put a lot of thought also in the people and the family piece, on when they take this uniform off, how are we trying to, how are we making sure that we’re taking care of them, that they’re going to be successful when they get out of our Air Force? And, you know, the reality is they never really get out. You’re Airman for life. But that’s where our focus is, on the people piece, and I don’t think that it’s shifted. We are just continuing to amplify it and make sure that they know that they’re taken care of.”

Murray: “Great, thanks, Chief. To Chief Towberman. Are there any unique challenges in the Space Force, how are people adjusting to the new service as well?”

Towberman: “Yes, so there’s certainly unique challenges, and with, you know, with, with so many things, I think two sides of the same coin. Our size challenges us, you know, we’ve got to rely on the Air Force, which does a great job of supporting us, but it’s a little bit, you know, scary, to say hey, we’re not going to have this organic capability necessarily to take care of you. That’s a little scary for people, it’s a little disheveling. At the same time, our size gives us an advantage, so there’s a degree of intimacy that we expect with all Guardian formations, that they’ll know each other well, that they will care for each other well, that they’ll will see each other throughout their entire career, that no one will ever be that disconnected from each other, really from day one, just because of our size and scale. So I think that offers us an advantage as well. A lot of the work that, that our sister service, the Air Force is doing, we’re taking advantage of, with embedded teams and, and, and a holistic look at comprehensive fitness. So we will continue to do that, and continue to give input into the joint models on resilience and fitness as well. Some things that our size and scale give us advantage, beyond the intimacy, is that we do think we can embed more teams, we think we can get those caregivers closer to Guardians, but maybe more importantly, we think we can get Guardians left of their own challenges, and do a better job than, than most at creating a culture where comprehensive fitness is baked into everything they do. So, we’re looking at wearable technologies, we’re looking at different ways to monitor the health, mental health, spiritual health, physical health of the force, and to, and to remember that as you come in and raise your hand and give a commitment that extends to death, that the institution has to earn that level of commitment every day. So we really see these as institutional obligations to take care of folks, not personal obligations to take care of yourself. Obviously there’s, there’s a personal component to care. We’ve got to do a better job of ensuring that they’re resourced, they’re trained, they’re equipped to put their mask on first, and to keep themselves healthy and fit across the full spectrum of comprehensive fitness.”

Murray: “Great, thanks for that. So, Chief CZ, what’s the Joint Staff doing to increase the well-being of all service members?”

Colón-López: “Well, Chief, simply put, we are listening. And, since the beginning of COVID, we have taken a very, very proactive approach to hear the voice of the force. Again, a lot of that is in collaboration with our service counterparts, but a few items that we have discovered since then is that the force, writ large, is dealing with food insecurity, poor nutrition, reduced physical activity, barriers to access to physical and behavioral health programs, childcare and education challenges, just to name a few. And I personally have been active with the Office of the Secretary of Defense, making sure that the policy matches, matches the needs of the people. And often that comes with high expediency and a sense of urgency, to make sure that our forces are, are taken care of. Because we know that if they’re not taken care of and their families are not taken care of, the mission readiness is going to decrease. And that is part of the Total Force fitness approach to the way that we’re wanting to go ahead and shift the focus to the maintenance of the human weapons systems, versus mechanisms that prevent people from doing what they appreciate as their purpose, and their lot in life. On the Total Force fitness arena. For those who don’t know, there’s eight dimensions to that initiative, and that is a program that resides in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, on their personnel readiness, and those eight dimensions are social, physical, financial, ideological and spiritual, medical and dental preventive care, environmental, and nutritional, the last one being the most important, psychological. Right now, most of the injuries that we’re dealing with, that are taking our people off the line, are what we call disease and non-battle injuries. And we’re breaking away at the barriers that are imposed and that stigma that comes along with seeking help when you need it the most. And I will say in this forum publicly that here next week, I have a follow on behavioral health assessment, again because of my TBI, and some of the issues that I have been dealing with, since spending several years in combat. There is no shame in doing that. If you need to help, please seek it out. And don’t think that the services, or the department is going to put you out to pasture if you decide to go ahead and come open with weaknesses, all right? In the end, it’s not a weakness, it’s a strength to be open about the help that you need. At the end of the day, what we want from every single one of you is to make sure that we’re here to help you out, and we’re here to maintain the combat effectiveness of every single human weapon system in the inventory of the Department of Defense. Focus on people. Absolutely. And then, with regards to the families, just as we speak right now today, Janet and all of the service senior enlisted spouses are at my quarters discussing and comparing notes on ways that we can better take care of our people. So this is a two-phase dimension here. We’ve got us as a service, and the department’s senior enlisted leaders, but our spouses are also heavily engaged on making sure that we have everything we need.”

Bass: “Hey, Number 14, can I jump on that one, too?”

Murray: “You sure can, go right ahead.”

Bass: “You know I love that the SEAC brought that up, and I love that he brought up that our spouses are engaged as well, because I’ll tell you, you know, Ron and I were chatting last night about, you know, how do we get things better for our families who are sometimes, the first indicator that things are going on with the service member. And so our spouses are very engaged, and keeping their ear to the ground on how do we how do we do better by the family piece. So I know you asked me initially about, hey, where are we shifting, and, and where, you know, have we changed our focus a little bit? One thing that I would offer that is different from, from when I came in. The military family dynamic is different today than it was 20-something years ago. When you look at today’s family, you have more single parents, you have more dual military, you have dual working. You have all different constructs, and to that point, the way we look at, wellness, fitness, has changed, and we’ve got to acknowledge that, and we’ve got to make sure that we are taking care of all aspects of the family. I just want to make sure that I chimed in on the family piece.”

Murray: “Fantastic. Fantastic, thanks for doing that. You know, one, and I think all three of you are well aware of, you know the one of our Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. Brown’s priority, priorities, is to accelerate change. So, kind of the final question then is that, the overarching, why do we need to change? How about Chief Towberman? You know, you’re in a unique position, setting the groundwork for best practices and, and the new branch of the military. What efforts are you currently making, and how will you improve the mission of the U.S. Space Force?”

Towberman: “Yeah, you know. So I think first and foremost, I think what’s important is certainly, from a headquarters perspective, it’s our job to kind of set the foundation for success. So when we talk about change, what’s become a swear jar word in my office if you will, is to talk about us changing, because we’re not changing at all. We just were born. And I think that that’s one of those conditions. To see this not as some change or evolution from another service, but as this opportunity to start with a clean sheet, to do something brand new, and to anchor ourselves to this notion that everything is new, and we can do anything we want, and we’re not changing anything, right? There’s certainly change that we’ve got to manage in everyone’s lives, but to think of this, first and foremost, as a new opportunity. Innovation is not about changing things. Innovation is coming up with new things. And so, I think that that’s kind of the first thing, and that would be included in, in, in several what I would call rules of thumb or heuristics that we try to bake into shared consciousness so that we can get the help that we need from the levels that we need it. If you’re sharing your consciousness, if you’re, if you’re setting those conditions for success, you really can now get ideas from the people that have to live with your decisions. And so, from the lowest levels on everything that we’re talking about, we’re getting input, we’re listening, and, and we’re hoping to bring all of that together always, so that people feel included and part of this new service from the very beginning. So that’s how we’re trying to tackle it. That’s how we’re kind of setting those conditions for success, and really just trust, right? There’s greatness there. A lot of times, you just have to, you know, give it a little water, give it some sunlight, and then watch it, watch it take off. So that’s what I keep hoping that our staff is going to do, keep reminding them, is what we owe everyone else, and then really trying every day to prove to everyone that we are listening, that we are paying attention, that we do need their help, and that we want them to be part of their future.”

Murray: “Great, thanks. So Chief Bass, then, in addition to helping Toby stand up the U.S. Space Force, the U.S. Air Force has been making some pretty major adjustments, including some that you’re leading. What changes can people, our Airmen and others, expect, and why are these changes important at this time?”

Bass: “So Gerald, there are a whole lot of things that we are seeking to get after when it comes to what is the Air Force need to look like in 2030, and what does an Airman need to look like in 2030. And I would offer and frame that the Airmen coming into basic training today are going, or the Airmen that are coming in through OTS, or some other accessions, are going to be our, our senior NCOs, or there’ll be our NCOs and senior NCOs, or our CGOs and FGOs leading the force in 2030. The current NCOs that are watching this today, or the current CGOs or FGOs are going to be the same people who are perhaps sitting on these panels in AFA in 2030 and beyond. And we have a lot of work to do when it comes to making sure that we are modernizing all things. And I would say, you know, modernizing the way we look at every policy and process that is in our ranks, whether that be something tactical at the unit level, or if that is something strategic, and so we are very focused on enterprise-level strategic changes, to weapon systems, to the human weapon system, to, to where we need to go, but every single Airman has a part in this. And their part is, when they get to their duty section or, or to wherever their space is, you know, what are the things that are going well, what are the things that are not. How do they see things from their lens, and how can they modernize and get after and be more effective in the space that they’re working in. We’ve, we have an opportunity now today more than ever, we’re, we’re at an inflection point that we’ve got to get this right. Our Air Force is smaller than we’ve ever been. And our adversaries are greater than they’ve ever been. And so we have got to maximize this opportunity, the stakes are just too high, and every single one of our Airmen counts in getting after the changes needed. Again, whether they be unit-level changes, wing-level, or all the way up to the Air Force level. We’re focused on those things.”

Murray: “Great, thanks, Chief. Chief Colón-López, CZ. What important, what is important to the Joint Force, or what important changes are important to the Joint Force, and how do you see these changes improving the joint mission?”

Colón-López: “Well, Chief, I’m gonna use this opportunity right now to educate the majority of the forces out there on the changes that actually may seem minimal but that make a huge difference. Everybody knows, since we have been fighting this counterinsurgency, counter-terrorist war for 20 years, that no fight has been unilateral it has taken a joint effort, a multinational effort, to get after the mission at hand. And that is the model that we’re going to follow from now on. So the joint perspective is critical to the success of future missions. Now, we all know that an educated force is a lethal force, specifically an enlisted educated force. But what we want to do with that education is number one, make it relevant. Number two, pointed. And number three, timely, to ensure that we’re getting the knowledge at the right time, so that our people can translate that into expectations, with the final outcome of action. Here tomorrow, we’re going to go ahead and unveil the enlisted PME vision, and we’re going to post it on our Facebook page, the SEAC Facebook page, the Joint Staff, and also on the Joint Staff web page. The intent, and the purpose of this particular document, is to provide you a foundation of expectations from every member fighting a joint war. And it’s titled, ‘Developing enlisted leaders for tomorrow’s wars.’ This has been done in collaboration with every single service senior enlisted advisor, and the senior enlisted advisor to the National Guard Bureau, also including the Coast Guard. And the reason we did that is because the multiple approaches to leadership that we have, based on the different cultures of the services, is what matters the most for a joint warfighter. And once we build the right Airman, Soldier, Guardian, Sailor, Marine, and Coast Guardsmen, to be able to go out and fight in the joint arena, there’s three things that will require, and that is character, competence, and commitment. And from that, we start growing you into a more rounded entity, to be able to go ahead and execute the mission, anytime, and any place. Part of that required change is that, once I came into this joint billet, the Joint Staff stripped me of my title of chief, so I am no longer a chief. My rank, as of December of 2019, is actually SEAC, and that is actually what is on my ID card. And the reason the chairman did that is because he didn’t want a parochial approach to the senior enlisted Advisor to the chairman based on knowledge by service, or bias to service. That forces any entity in this particular position to learn and know more about what is important in the culture that resides in every particular service. So when we look at great power competition and the way that we’re going to train and fight and equip for future conflicts, it’s going to take a joint approach. But what we’re gonna do for you, because of this necessity, is make sure that we give you the right tools to set you up for success, and make sure that you have clear, pointed, and timely education, to be able to be successful in the joint environment.”

Murray: “Well, SEAC Colón-López, I stand educated today, which is, one, I’m sorry that it took a couple of years that I hadn’t realized that that change, I knew your title, but about your rank so, you know, one of the more important things about, you know, why we’re here today, in professional development and education there. So, thank you very much for that. You know, it was when I sat in Chief Bass’s seat is when the position of the SEAC, the senior enlisted advisor to the chairman was created. And some of our early vision, you just laid out for us, the fulfillment, some of the fulfillment of that. And bringing together, so I may, I’ll be excited to read about, you know, what you’re putting the focus on our senior enlisted leaders in the joint environment. All right then, SEAC and chiefs, we have just a few more minutes, and so let me give you just an opportunity here to, to give any final comments that you might have. We have, you know, as of today, nearly 4,000 people that have been that have signed up, and as I spoke about earlier, Guardians, Airmen, government and industry professionals, that signed up for this symposium. And then, we certainly, we hope after this that we’ll have the opportunity to air, and so many others will be able to get the chance to tune in and to hear your thoughts, you know, from this live session. So, any follow up? Any last comments that that you’d like to make here for our audience today? Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Bass, how about, we’ll start with you again.”

Bass: “All right, hey, Gerald. Once again, thanks to AFA for providing an opportunity for us to come out and, and talk, and dialogue with you guys. I always learn something great from spending time with SEAC, and CMSSF, you know, as well. You know ,what I what I typically close out with, and share with our Airmen and families, first off is just thank you. You know, we’re an all-volunteer force, and, and we don’t have to do what we do, but you raise your hand to, to serve our great nation, and there is no greater honor than to wear this uniform every day, and serve this great nation, especially at a time like this, where your service counts more than ever, where we’re at an inflection point that we really do have to make the necessary changes, and accelerate towards them, to make sure that we can continue doing our mission, which is to defend our nation, and her, and her interests. And so we’re very focused on those things, every one of our Airmen counts. We’ve got to be in the business of developing, growing, and training Airmen to think differently, to think critically, creatively, and innovatively. And those just can’t be buzzwords, we have to develop Airmen that are resilient, and have the grit to be who we need them to be. And we have to create a culture where it is one that is inclusive of all the very talented Airmen that we have across the force. We’ve got a lot of work to do, but I am honored to serve in this capacity, as the chief master in the Air Force, to lead our Airmen, to care for their families, and to partner with our sister services, to get after our nation’s business. That’s ultimately what it’s all about. And so I look forward to seeing a lot of you all in your formations. Thanks for listening in, but more importantly, I would encourage everybody to listen in to some of the other great senior leaders that are going to be talking and sharing currently what’s going on, as well as strategically, where we are going, listening to the panels. This is, again, how do we develop critical leaders and ones who think differently? We’ve got, we’ve got to get some of that in us, so thanks AFA for creating a platform where our Airmen can get that.”

Murray: “Thank you, Chief Bass. Chief Towberman.”

Towberman: “So I’ll say thank you, as well, of course. I mean, It’s just, it’s really, really great to have this welcoming attitude from AFA for our Guardians, and, and to include us in this, so just from the bottom of my heart, thank you, and thanks to everybody that’s out there, paying attention, and taking advantage of this opportunity to grow. You know, we were visiting a prominent commercial space partner recently and, and when, when I asked them about talent management, and I asked them about how they know, you know, who to hire, and what, what’s the, you know, what’s the, what’s the thing they’re looking for, there was an answer that maybe I should have expected, but it was really cool to hear, and that was that the single greatest indicator of long-term success is a willingness to self-improve. And so everyone that’s tuning in this week has shown a willingness to self-improve, has shown this inherent growth mindset that’s so important to every service, to our nation, and to our future. And so I just really appreciate that all of you out there with that growth mindset, with that willingness, perhaps obligation to get better every single day, are using it to spend time with AFA this week, and to listen to all the senior leaders, to all the special speakers that are here, and to do everything you can to, to make your tomorrow include a better version of you than your today does. So thanks, thanks to everybody for tuning in, thanks again to AFA, thanks SEAC and Chief Bass, we appreciate you both, and look forward to seeing you again soon.”

Murray: “Great. Thank you, Chief. And SEAC, if you will close us out.”

Colón-López: “Thank you, No. 14, and again, thank you all so much for this opportunity to be able to reach out to many Airman, civilians, and contractors that may be tuning in. But I will just leave you with one thought, and that is, you deserve what you tolerate. Now it’s no secret that we have been living in some pretty tough times here lately. All right, we have some issues, you know, we’re dealing with sexual assault, harassment, suicide, many other issues, diversity and inclusion, that are plaguing and eroding the cohesion of military services. You deserve what you tolerate. If you see a problem, don’t walk past it, take action. If you have a fix, voice it. And if you need to stand up for somebody, stand tall. And make sure that your voice and your actions carry the mail to the people that need to correct that. This is all about personal involvement, and accountability, and we can do that at the lowest levels. Do not wait for the institution to spoon feed you the solutions that are intrinsic to mission command. So get after the issues and make sure that you’re properly taking care of your people. And for the families, man, I have to tell you that I mentioned a few of the issues that you have brought forward, some of the hardship that has been imposed over this, under this COVID environment, but we’ve got your back. We continue to seek solutions to your problems, and we’ll continue to seek out every particular option to better take care of you. So again, thank you, and it has been an honor being here with you today.”

Murray: “Well, SEAC, it’s been my honor. And Chiefs, I can absolutely, I know firsthand, because I know all three of you, and have for a long time, of just how well that our Guardians, our Airmen, and our Joint Force forces are served by your great leadership. We can’t thank you enough for your service, and look forward to, as you continue to lead our forces. Thank you.”

Watch, Read: Acting SECAF Fireside Chat with AFA’s President

Watch, Read: Acting SECAF Fireside Chat with AFA’s President

Watch the video or read the transcript of Acting Air Force Secretary John P. Roth and retired Lt. Gen. Bruce “Orville” Wright, AFA President, participating in a fireside chat during AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium.

AFA President retired Lt. Gen. Bruce “Orville” Wright: “It’s my special privilege to introduce the Honorable John Roth, our acting Secretary of the Air Force. He’s responsible for organizing, training, and equipping the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force, and for the welfare of 697,000 Active-duty, Guard, Reserve, and civilian Airman, Guardians and their families. So sir, a sincere and heartfelt welcome to you, a great friend of our Air Force Association. It has been an honor to be with you today, and to support our Airmen and Guardians. And now, if we could serve a couple of opening remarks and then we’ll go to a couple of questions.”

Acting Secretary of the Air Force John P. Roth: “Well, again, thank you, Orville, for having me this morning and thanks, thank you to the AFA for all the things you do to support our Department of the Air Force, both on the Air and Space side. We look forward to partnering with you and all your members as well as we go forward. There’s a lot of important issues for the nation, and for us as an Air Force as well, that we need to deal with. So I look forward to our discussion this morning, and I look forward to our ongoing relationship going forward.”

Wright: “Thank you, sir. And you know, you’re one of the few people who have direct access to our new Secretary of Defense. Sir, could you share with our audience what Secretary [Lloyd] Austin’s current focus is for the Department of Defense?”

Roth: “Secretary Austin and, I think we’re, you know, obviously very fortunate to have a secretary like Secretary Austin who has a long history and a long association with the Defense Department, so I think, you know, we’re very grateful to have him on board as secretary. And along with him, Deputy Secretary (Kathleen) Hicks, as well, as we go forward. So we look forward to partnering with our friends in the Office of the Secretary of Defense’s as we deal with some of these issues. And so he’s made it very clear that his, his priorities are first and foremost we need to focus on defending the nation and protecting American interests. Those are sort of the core values of what we are about as a department, and we need to make sure we’re not distracted. 

“Secondly, in order to achieve that, we need to take care of our people. It’s all about our people, I mean, the total force in terms of DOD is about 2 million plus. For us in the Air Force along with our active, reserve component, our civilians were about 700,000 people. So taking care of our people is an important imperative. And last but not least is teamwork, and he means teamwork in its broadest sense. Teamwork, both internally within the Defense Department, in the nature of the jointness, working with our Army and Navy partners as well, but also teamwork in the interagency, teamwork with our allies and partners, teamwork with our industry partners, and that type of thing. So those are his three major pillars.”

Wright: “Well thanks, sir, and building on your terrific description of our Secretary of Defense’s focus, could we drill down a bit on your own secretary of the Air Force focus inside our Department of the Air Force?”

Roth: “Well, I think what’s important is, you know, we are in the midst of a transition from one administration to the other, that’s a natural outgrowth of our American political system. We’ve done this before. And so I think it’s important, it’s important for me personally, and I think it’s important for the enterprise, that, that we manage this transition in as smooth and as transparent a process as we possibly can. I think it ought to be transparent to our, to our Airmen and Guardians, it ought to be transparent to our partners, it ought to be transparent to our competitors. We are here to defend a nation, and that’s not going to change, regardless of which administration. And so I view my, my role here is to ensure we as the Air Force, that we continue the momentum that we have built up on both the air on the space side. We can’t afford to take a pause. We can’t afford to take a pause, strategic or otherwise and wait for all the various nominations to take place and all the kinds of things that go along with that. 

“So my job is to ensure we maintain that momentum, and we continue our initiatives in the case of, on the air side, Chief Brown has been very articulate in terms of, you know, his emphasis on acceleration and accelerating or we lose. And on the Space Force, you know, Space Force has now in year two, they’ve had a terrific year, in terms of standing up last year, and now we need to get on with the integration and other kinds of things. So, again, my job more than anything else, is to ensure that I support the two chiefs, and that we maintain the kinds of momentum that I think are necessary to defend the nation.”

Wright: “Thanks, sir, perfect. Could you then, based on your priorities, talk a bit about force modernization and posture. Programs of priority, Air Force and Space Force, and how you view, and especially for our audience and our industry partners, your overall take on, again, force modernization and posture.”

Roth: “Well, I think it’s very clear, we need to be, we need to be very clear eyed and focused on, on, on, on addressing the competitors that we have out there, both China and to some lesser extent, Russia, and make sure, we need to modernize, let me just start with that. We need to modernize across a wide range of capabilities, and we need to focus on, in particular, how do I execute the national defense strategy and looking to 2030 and beyond, what capabilities do I need in the future. And so, we need to be focused on that, both on the air and space side, and to some extent, we’re going to have to make some, some decisions internally in terms of the balance between legacy kinds of requirements and looking to the future. And I think what the strength of the national defense strategy has been is the focus on China. OK, they are investing in a wide range of capabilities that should be of concern to us. And what I have, what I am taken with is, in this town there’s been a fair amount of bipartisan support and bipartisan rhetoric, to say yes indeed, China is a problem. So that hasn’t changed. Just within the last couple of weeks, you’ve seen a number of political leaders articulate the need to take a hard look at what China means to us. So we as an Air Force need to need to stay ahead of that curve. And so again, both on the air side, in terms of aircraft, in terms of command and control capabilities, in terms of IT capabilities, in terms of space capabilities, we need to make sure we maintain that momentum.”

Wright: “Well, thanks, sir, you know, a broader part of our audience is our Airmen and our Guardians and their families. So building on some of your comments about Secretary Austin’s focus areas on taking care of people, could you talk just a bit about how the department of the Air Force is aligned with those priorities, including the importance of role models?”

Roth: “Yes, I mean, none of all the things we’ve just talked about, in terms of momentum and the modernization and all, takes place without our people. I mean, the people are the core, OK, and so what we need to focus on is ensuring that we maintain the kind of, three core values that we’ve always talked about in terms of our people. The core values of excellence, the core value of integrity, and the core value of service. and we need to stay focused on that. I know, you know, my friends and the people that work for me always chuckle, I always go back to first principles, and back to core values. When in doubt, go back to those core values. And so we need to ensure that we have a force, and that we have an enterprise, where people can come in and work to their maximum potential, and not live in fear, or not have, have to look over their shoulder in terms of their concerns and these types of things. So at the end of the day, in terms of defending the nation and representing our interests across the globe, is it comes down to readiness, the readiness of the force, and anything that undermines that readiness, or anything that that is destructive or corrosive to that readiness, we need to take on in an open and honest way. The vast majority of our force, take their oath seriously and are there and ready to serve. And we recognize that, and we should honor that. But we also need to be clear-eyed where there are challenges, we need to be open and honest about the challenges, and we need to address those. So I think that’s in large part what the, Secretary Austin had in mind and we in the Air Force will do our part in ensuring that we move forward and take care of our people as best we can.”

Wright: “Yes sir. Well sir, can you talk a little bit about, really how those values ensured our Air Force, in support of our nation, has fought through the COVID attack? There’s a lot going on, obviously, in the news around COVID, and I think there’s a great story to tell about how well the Air Force and our Space Force have fought through the attack.”

Roth: “I agree 100%, OK, I think we the Air Force have dealt with this in an extraordinary way. COVID, the COVID crisis is clearly the existential challenge for the nation today, and obviously for the globe as well. We need to get this behind us, OK? There’s a lot in terms of our economy, in terms of our society, in terms of our schools, all these kinds of things, so we need to get the COVID crisis behind us. So we the Air Force are ready to do our part, and have been doing our part all along, OK? And I’m very proud of the force. So, in terms of internally within the force is, we’ve, we’ve made adjustments, and, and continued to be able to do our jobs and maintain our readiness. So we’re flying the flying hours, we’re taking part in missions, we have B-1s flying and on missions, we have B-52s flying or supporting our deployed troops in CENTCOM, the education and training community has done a fabulous job in maintaining the throughput through basic military training and all. Since this time last year, we have, we have sent over 27,000 people through basic military training and the like. So we’ve made the kinds of adjustments, we’ve implemented the kinds of protocols to try to adjust as best. We’re trying to maintain production and our acquisition community as best we can, working with our industrial partners and all. So to your point, I think the Air Force has done an absolutely outstanding job internally in terms of coping with the COVID crisis and, and making sure that we continue to be ready to do the nation’s business. 

“Then on a larger scale in terms of our responsibility to the nation, we’re ready to help, and have been all along. As I think many of your, your, your viewers are aware of, we’ve sent out medical teams to help out in local hospitals, particularly in California and Texas and other areas. And we’ve, we’ve leaned forward and are working with the administration now to help populate and man some of these vaccination teams, working with FEMA and other partners. We have two teams in place and we have another four or five teams ready to go to help with the vaccination process. And the vaccination process is key to all it is, I need to take this opportunity to foot stomp. I’m lucky enough, I’ve had the opportunity, I’ve had the shots, OK, and I strongly encourage. Virtually our entire leadership team has taken the vaccinations. We need to get that done, and I certainly encourage, certainly our force, our Airmen and our Guardian, everybody needs to step up. We already have over 270,000 vaccinations that we have already put into people’s arms within the Air Force, and we’ve had a relatively low declination rate, somewhere in the neighborhood of 20% or so. And they’re starting to come around as well. So vaccinations are key, continue to honor the COVID protocols is a key, and we as a nation will get this behind us. And we the Air Force stand ready to do our part.”

Wright: “Yes sir. In fact, we recently heard from one of the commands, they’re using sort of a 30-day period, and I think as these our young Airmen and Guardians are watching their friends get the shot, waiting 30 days, they’ve got a significant take rate at about the 30-day point when they’re asked again to take the shot. Hey sir, it’d be a great opportunity, given your experience, to talk about digitizing the battlespace, digital manufacturing. You’ve been in so many sessions over the years, and you’re right in the middle when we talk about going from acquisition to lethality, and there’s always money involved. So could you talk about digitizing the battlespace, digital manufacturing a bit? I think there’s a terrific opportunity there when we talk about, bring real value if you will, to accelerate change or lose.”

Roth: “Yes, oh no, absolutely. Well, we are evolving into a digital force and we need to keep that. And of course my kids get a big kick out of the fact that I would be pushing a digital force analysis and all, since they know I’m all thumbs and I’ve got an analog kind of a head. But having said that, we need, both on the Air and Space side, it is all about digitizing the force. You alluded to the digital acquisition process in terms of digital engineering, in terms of building open architectures, in terms of agile software and all those kinds of things. The space chief has been very, very articulate about he is going to build a Space Force that is a digital Space Force, you know, full stop. And in terms of, you know, digitizing the battlespace, JADC2, ABMS, all those kinds of initiatives are all, at their core, about getting, getting the entire battle environment digitized, OK? The key is speed of data, having situational awareness, getting data from sensor to shooter as quickly as you can, being as agile as you can—you don’t know who the shooter might be. And so you need to have that kind of situational awareness and you need to be able to be agile enough to move data at the speed of relevance. [Defense] Secretary [James] Mattis when he was here always talked about the speed of relevance and I find that to be a terrific phrase. So it’s all about acceleration. Chief Brown has talked about acceleration. We’re all about speed. And so digitization is, is the core capability to core competency that all of us need for the battle, for the battlespace of the future.”

Wright: “Yes sir. Well sir, I’d be great for us to give you the opportunity to really talk about whatever you want to talk about for this, this audience today. But I would start maybe with a couple of ideas around our combat air forces, and, and the future. And certainly, we have terrific programs that are relatively new, the KC 46 rolling out and becoming more operationally capable every day. The F-35. Talking to the pilots that fly it, they think it’s the best airplane ever, best combat aircraft ever. The B-21 is out there. Obviously all those combat air forces capabilities, tied to mobility air forces, and tied to space. It’s one team, one fight. So I would just kind of leave it open to you, we, we’d love to hear whatever you have to share across kind of a menu of opportunities to talk about.”

Roth: “Sure. Love to. Again, we talked about at the beginning of our conversation, that modernizing Air and Space Force is a key, key to going forward and dealing with the threats that we perceive today, and the threats that we see in 2030 and beyond. So all of those programs you talk about are, are vital to our capabilities going forward. The key is we need to perform, OK. Now as, you know, wearing my old financial manager hat now, and now that I’ve suited up as Secretary as well. When all is said and done, these are all important programs, but they all need to continue to make the progress you have, I think there’s a good news story across the board, but that doesn’t happen automatically. And so we as management, and with our industry partners as well, at the end of the day, we need to show that we can perform. We talk a lot now about speed. Our acquisition executive, Will Roper, always, always very articulate about trying to speed up the acquisition process and all, and I think that’s absolutely correct. I’m all in. OK, but in doing so, we need to show that we can actually produce, and we can actually perform. And as we get all the talking heads in town talk about we’re entering an era here of more competition for resources, a somewhat tighter budget climate, that’s probably correct given the kind of deficits we have and all the money that we’re throwing at the COVID problem and the like. And so, really, at the end of the day, those programs that perform will probably be winners and will, will probably succeed. Those programs that don’t will likely suffer and perhaps won’t succeed as well as we get into sort of the competition going forward. But we need the capability. It’s all about capabilities. The two chiefs are very articulate in talking about the fact it’s all about the capabilities we need. We can talk about the platforms, they’re fun to talk about, they’re exciting to talk about, and these kinds of things. But we need the kinds of capabilities in order to make sure that we can prevail, that we first of all can deter, but that we can, you know, if necessary, that we also prevail, and that we prevail in the 2030 and beyond kind of a timeframe.” 

“I actually had an opportunity here earlier this week to fly in the KC-46. And so I, I share that. Terrific airplane, OK? It was a lot of fun, you know, finally getting me out from behind my desk and into an actual air airplane. God forbid the Secretary the Air Force actually got the fly in an airplane, OK? So anyway, so I enjoyed it immensely. But you know, it obviously has, has some issues there, we still need to work on the on the remote visual system and get it right. I actually got a demonstration of it and all, but we’ll get there, OK? We’re working on fixes to it as well. I agree with, you know, with the F-35 is a, is the core airplane that we need going forward here in the foreseeable future. And, of course, there’s a wide range of things we need in the space. There’s virtually nothing we do on the ground that doesn’t depend in some manner, shape, or form in a capability that we get from space. And so we need to continue to invest in space. We had the advantage for about, over, well over 50 years of a very benign report environment in space. Those days are gone, OK? Between China and Russia now, they’re putting capabilities into space that have never been in space before, and most importantly, they’re putting anti-satellite kinds of capabilities into play here that we have to pay attention to and stay ahead of the power curve on. So all of that takes resources, all of that takes management, and all of that takes attention. And so we just need to be very laser-focused on performance and getting it done and making sure we make every dollar go as far as it can.”

Wright: “Yes sir. You know, sir, we’ve had discussions recently about improving, essentially communications, from warfighting requirements, and the capabilities that you said we need, and industries understanding, comprehension, if you will, of what those requirements are. So, I know you’ve been leading that for many years in fact, but how would you sort of update the audience, those warfighters who are out there thinking about the capabilities that they need, and certainly there are terrific program managers and engineers across the industry who’d like to build those capabilities and stay ahead of the Chinese, if you will. So, any thoughts on that would, I think, the audience would appreciate.”

Roth: “I actually think that, that’s a good point. So, I think, you know, to some extent, we don’t know what we don’t know. What we’re looking for, for a lot of help from industry and other partners that perhaps have not been traditional partners in what we do, is the kind of creativity and innovation that is inherent in our, in our in our economy and in our technology base and this type of thing. And so I think for the last three or four years, we’ve had a concerted effort to reach out beyond sort of the same old suspects kind of thing and looking for, for our national capabilities, and inviting them in. I mean, we’ve gotten the message that over the years that we’re not a particularly kind and useful customer, and that were hard to get to. And we’re trying to break that paradigm. And so, as I think as many of you are aware, we’ve had these pitch days and we’ve had other kinds of reach out kinds of initiatives. AFWERX has been very active and kind of, you know, creating the creative and innovative kind of environment, and we’ve now stood up a SpaceWERX as well. And so, the idea is, we would like to bring people in to, frankly, provide us things we haven’t thought of, OK? New paradigms, new ways of tackling the same sort of problems and these kinds of things. So that’s really, I think, the key going forward as we look to the future, is that we’re, to bring in the kinds of things that perhaps we haven’t thought of, given for, you know, maybe some of our past tunnel vision and in terms of always thinking about the kinds of platforms we have today. And there’s maybe, you know, a young engineer or a young, young technologist out there who’s, who’s, you know, sitting out there who can bring us, you know the ‘Aha’ moment, OK, going forward. And we look forward to working with people. And so hopefully we’re learning, and where we’re not a good customer, we’d like to hear from people and get the feedback, and, and I think we’re open to changing. And I think we’ve changed the environment and we’ve changed our paradigm to a great extent. So that’s what I would ask, is people come to us and, and where they find barriers, talk to us and see what we can do about reducing these barriers and moving forward. That’s the key. I think the strength of America, the strength of our nation vis-a-vis any competitor is basically our innovative creative entrepreneurial spirit. And we the Air Force, we the Department of Air Force, both on the Air and Space side, would like to tap into that, to tap into that creativity. And if we can, then I think we as a nation can, can rest easy, we’re in good hands.”

Wright: “Well sir, terrific, terrific perspective and guidance. We’re getting close to the end here of a much appreciated time. For the next five minutes or so, your perspective really on any one of a number of societal issues that might creep into our combat readiness. You talked about that earlier on, and how to sort of encourage, if you will, and reiterate the goodness of our force, the importance of combat readiness, as we fully understand, we’re part of the fabric of society, today’s society.”

Roth: “Yeah, I mean that’s, I mean that’s really the point, is, is we are a reflection of our society. I mean, that’s where we draw from, that’s where our force comes from, that’s where we recruit from. We’re an all-volunteer force. And so we, clearly, we want to be an employer of choice, we want people to want to, to want to come to us. And so we need to pay attention. People issues are never easy. People issues take work, they take attention. And so we need to work at, work at it, on a daily basis, on a weekly basis, on a monthly basis, we need to keep working these kinds of issues. At the end of the day, first of all, as I said here a few moments ago, you know, we understand that for the vast majority of our force is in fact, understands their oath and they’re ready to do the nation’s business. And we’re appreciative, from where I sit, you know, I’m appreciative, and I honor their service and anything I can do to help them. But that said, we are, as you indicated, a reflection of society, and some of the stresses and strains that are that are out there in society. And I think we would be well served to address those in an open candid way, OK? At the end of the day, it’s all about dignity and respect, and having a force that can maximize its potential. And where we have issues, and where there are situations that undermine that, OK, and are corrosive to that, then we need to be honest with ourselves, OK, and deal with this. Ignoring them is not going to make the problem easier. And so when there are issues that involving harassment, or assault, or hate speech, or anything of that nature where people are discriminated against and all, we ought to look at that and deal with it and talk about it, and that’s one of the purposes of, of the stand down that Secretary Austin has asked us to do. A one-day event’s not going to solve all our problems, and so nobody would ever claim. But it’s important to have the dialogue, it’s important to talk to each other, it’s important for leadership to listen. I’m a big fan of, sort of, you listen. Virtually every time you listen and you listen seriously, you’ll learn something. We’re looking for feedback, OK? There is no one person that has all the answers to this. If we did, we would have done this a long time ago. So we need to keep working issues, that’s all I would ask the community: let’s work together, OK? The strength of a nation, we have existed well over 200 years, we’re a highly diverse nation, we’re a highly diverse force. That’s a strength, in my humble view. That is the strength of the American way. But that doesn’t mean we don’t have challenges that we need to address. So I just encourage people have, to be open minded about it, to be candid with each other, be candid in a way of dignity and respect. And if we do that, I think that we’ll be well served.”

Wright: “Yes sir. Sir, as we close out, your Air Force Association has some 97,000 members across, across every state and around the world, many volunteer leaders at the chapter level, and certainly with, interacting with their community partners and with elected officials. In our mission as your Air Force Association, to educate the public, and advocate for dominant Air and Space Forces, we’d appreciate your thoughts and your perspective for how we best might articulate that message and educate the public in the nation’s need for dominant Air and Space Forces.”

Roth: “Well, first of all, I appreciate everything that AFA does already, and has always done over the many years and all. So, you know, I think we have a story to tell, we the Department of Air Force. We now have an Air Force and a Space Force, it’s an exciting time. It’s an exciting time to be part of the Air Force. We’ve talked here a little bit this morning very briefly about some of the technologies that we’re pursuing and trying to work our way to being a digital force, both on the Air and Space side. And so anything we can do as a partnership to tell that story, and, you know, inform, particularly the influencers, both here within Washington, but on a broader scale as well, is to work as a partnership, and to articulate what we bring to the table. We think we have a good story, and as we move to this joint all domain kind of a warfare, we think a centerpiece of that, of that story is in fact the Department of the Air Force and the kinds of capabilities we have. And so I would just say, in an in a very open, you know, fact-based, analytical way, is to tell people the story we have. Tell people where we’re trying to go, and work together as we go through all the various, you know, we’re going to go through some challenges here as we put together the next couple of budgets and those kinds of things, but I think we have a good story to tell and we’re happy to work with AFA and other partners to tell that story.”

Wright: “Well, for sure, sir, and you’ve heard me say this before, we’re on your wing. And there are, again, thousands of volunteer leaders, committed volunteer leaders, working full time. They’re ardent in their advocacy for their Airman and their Guardians. And so we appreciate the opportunity. Sir, we’re winding up here. By the way, later today we have Spark Tank, talking about innovations. And it’s to your point, to validate your point, really incredible young men and women thinking way outside the container on opportunities to defend this nation. So again, sir, thank you so much for joining us this morning. It’s an honor to be here with you. And we, I promise you, your AFA will continue to be with you and every member of our Department of the Air Force: Airmen, Guardians, and their families, in every possible way. Thanks, sir.”

Roth: “Well, thank you for having me.”

vAWS 2021: Emerging Technology and the High-End Fight: Insights from the Latest War Games

vAWS 2021: Emerging Technology and the High-End Fight: Insights from the Latest War Games

Watch Lt. Gen. S. Clinton Hinote, deputy chief of staff for strategy, integration, and requirements; Lt. Gen. William J. Liquori Jr., deputy chief of space operations, strategy, plans, programs, requirements, and analysis, USSF; and moderator, retired Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies; take part in the “Emerging Technology and the High-End Fight: Insights from the Latest War Games” session from AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium.

vAWS 2021: Mission Domain Live Engagement—EW

vAWS 2021: Mission Domain Live Engagement—EW

Video: Air Force Association on YouTube

Watch Scott Evers, vice president of survivability and special programs at Elbit Systems of America; Dave Robbins, director of the Leidos Innovations Center and senior vice president at Leidos; and moderator Air Force Brig. Gen. David M. Gaedecke, vice commander of Sixteenth Air Force (Air Forces Cyber), take part in the “Mission Domain Live Engagement—EW” session from AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium.

vAWS 2021: Mission Domain Live Engagement—Hypersonics

vAWS 2021: Mission Domain Live Engagement—Hypersonics

Video: Air Force Association on YouTube

Watch Air Force Maj. Gen. Andrew J. Gebara, director of strategic plans, programs, and requirements at Headquarters Air Force Global Strike Command; USAF Brig. Gen. Heath A. Collins, program executive officer for weapons and director of the Armament Directorate at the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center; James Weber, senior scientist for hypersonics at the Air Force Research Laboratory; Michael White, principal director of hypersonics in the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research & Engineering; and moderator Michael R. Gregg, director of the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Aerospace Systems Directorate, take part in the “Mission Domain Live Engagement—Hypersonics” session from AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium.

vAWS 2021: Perspectives from the EUCOM Commander

vAWS 2021: Perspectives from the EUCOM Commander

Watch Gen. Tod D. Wolters, commander of U.S. European Command and NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), and retired Lt. Gen. Bruce “Orville” Wright, AFA president, take part in the “Perspectives from the EUCOM Commander” session from AFA’s 2021 virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium.