DOD Struggling to Improve Readiness in Every Domain

DOD Struggling to Improve Readiness in Every Domain

The Defense Department has regained some lost readiness after two decades of continuous combat, but still has more work to do, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

“Nearly two decades of conflict has degraded U.S. military readiness,” wrote report author Diana Maurer, GAO’s director of Defense Capabilities and Management.

The 2019 National Defense Authorization Act required the Pentagon to track readiness by domain—air, land, sea, space, and cyber—rather than by individual service branch. GAO found readiness improved for land forces, decreased for sea forces, and was mixed in air, space, and cyber. The public report released April 7 is thin on specifics, however, as much of the data included in the classified version provided to Congress was redacted.

For the air domain, for example, researchers looked at:

  • Bombers—B-1, B-2, and B-52
  • Fighters—F-15, F-16, F/A-18, F-22, and F-35
  • Air Refuelers—KC-10, KC-130, and KC-135
  • Combat helicopters—AH-64, AH/UH-1, and HH-60.

Among 19 mission areas reviewed from fiscal 2017 to 2019, resource readiness improved in 10, including missions in every domain except for sea. However, mission capability readiness improved in only five of the 19, all in the land domain. Mission capability readiness ratings declined overall in the sea, air, space, and cyber domains, according to the report.

Resource readiness measures the unit commander’s assessment of their organization’s ability to undertake the wartime or primary missions for which the unit is organized or designed. Called C-levels, they measure four distinct resource indicators—personnel, equipment availability,
equipment readiness, and how well the unit is trained.

Mission capability readiness measures how unit commands evaluate
the readiness of forces to accomplish assigned and potential tasks, under conditions specified in their joint mission-essential task list. This assessment is measured on a three-step scale: “Y,” or “yes;” “Q” or “qualified yes;” and “N,” or “no.”

The Air Force cited catastrophic damage from Hurricane Michael and “associated infrastructure limitations” on its F-22 fighters as some of its biggest readiness challenges, while the Army cited pilot shortages—especially for the AH-64 attack helicopter. The Marine Corps blamed problems plaguing its light attack helicopters on “limited depot repair capacity.”

Space presented a different set of challenges, especially the fact that readiness reporting is not required for all space units. The lack of “clear readiness goals for space units,” and “unit-level readiness reporting not accurately conveying the readiness of key space capabilities” make calculating space readiness extremely difficult, the report said.

Limited maintenance capacity at both private and public shipyards was the biggest hurdle in the Navy’s efforts to recover readiness.

The Defense Department largely agreed with the findings.

DOD Increasing COVID-19 Vaccines for OCONUS Personnel, Families

DOD Increasing COVID-19 Vaccines for OCONUS Personnel, Families

The Pentagon expects all Defense Department personnel to be able to make an appointment for a COVID-19 vaccine by April 19, and all overseas personnel and beneficiaries will be able to get the shot by May as deliveries ramp up.

Because overseas personnel and families have limited options to receive a vaccine—unlike those serving within the United States, they must use on-base facilities—there has been concern about the ability to get a shot, said Lt. Gen. Ronald J. Place, the director of the Defense Health Agency, during an April 8 briefing. In response, the Pentagon is distributing 14 percent of its total vaccines to locations outside of the continental United States, where 7 percent of eligible personnel are stationed.

“We expect that we will be able to deliver at least an initial dose to every eligible OCONUS person who wants one by the middle of May,” Place said.

One complicating factor has been a recent production mistake at a Johnson & Johnson facility in Baltimore, which resulted in a batch of 15 million doses being ruined. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which does not require cold storage and is easier to ship, has been the priority for OCONUS locations. Now the Pentagon is working to increase Moderna and Pfizer vaccine shipments abroad.

“We are actively exploring other means to offset this temporary shortage,” Place said.

Within the Air Force, the department has delivered 499,683 vaccines to more than 125 sites worldwide, said Maj. Gen. Robert I. Miller, the director of medical operations in the Air Force Office of the Surgeon General. Of those, 444,083 doses have been administered, he said.

In the past three weeks, Pacific Air Forces and U.S. Air Forces in Europe have been prioritized since the two major commands have the highest percentage of personnel receiving the vaccine compared to other MAJCOMs. As of April 4, 35 percent of the 53,000 eligible personnel in USAFE have received at least one dose, with 22 percent fully vaccinated. In PACAF, 26 percent of the 109,000 eligible personnel have received at least one dose and 20 percent have been fully vaccinated, he said.

Because off-base options don’t exist for these personnel, the Air Force wants to keep these MAJCOMs as the “focus for vaccine distribution,” he said. For example, in February the Air Force delivered 6,500 Moderna doses to USAFE, and is now expecting to deliver 11,000 this month. The Air Force is also planning to ship more Pfizer doses to overseas locations as they become available for 16- to 17-year-olds, Miller said.

“The readiness of our force, including our Air and Space Force families, is our No. 1 priority,” Miller said.

USAF Unveils New Mission Statement

USAF Unveils New Mission Statement

The Air Force’s new mission statement is familiar, all-encompassing, and joins two parallel aspects of the service’s 74-year history: “To fly, fight, and win … Airpower anytime, anywhere.”

The new mission statement focuses on air alone, now that the Space Force is independent, and emerged from consultations with a spectrum of Airmen representing Active, Guard, and Reserve members in both the enlisted and officer ranks, said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. in a release.

Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass said the mission statement will help join the entire force of more than 689,000 Airmen, regardless of whether their core mission is air superiority; global strike; rapid global mobility; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; or command and control.

“Every Airman, from every career field, is directly responsible for delivering, supporting, launching, and driving air power,” Bass said in the release.

Air Force Association President and retired Lt. Gen. Bruce “Orville” Wright said the mission statement joins two central concepts and themes that have carried the Air Force forward throughout its history. “Flying, fighting and winning is the combat goal, it’s what Airmen do,” he said. “But that is underscored by the imperative of what our Air Force contributes to our nation’s security: Delivering unparalleled air power, any place, any time, no matter the risk or obstacles before us. This is possible because of the commitment, readiness, and professionalism of our Airmen and the unwavering support of their families.”

Air Force Announces 43 General Officer Moves

Air Force Announces 43 General Officer Moves

Acting Air Force Secretary John P. Roth announced a host of new general officer assignments on Aug. 6, including new commanders for Second and Eighth Air Forces.

They include:

  • Maj. Gen. Michele C. Edmondson will be assigned as commander, 2nd Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Keesler Air Force Base, Miss. Edmondson is currently serving as commandant of cadets, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colo. 
  • Maj. Gen. Kenneth P. Ekman will be assigned as the director, plans, and programs, J-5, Headquarters U.S. Africa Command, Stuttgart, Germany. Ekman is currently assigned as deputy commander, operations and intelligence, Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve, U.S. Central Command; and commander, 9th Air Expeditionary Task Force-Levant, Air Combat Command, Southwest Asia.
  • Maj. Gen. Andrew J. Gebara will be assigned as the commander, Eighth Air Force; and commander, Joint-Global Strike Operations Center, Air Force Global Strike Command, Barksdale Air Force Base, La. Gebara is currently assigned as director, strategic plans, programs, and requirements, Headquarters Air Force Global Strike Command, Barksdale Air Force Base, La. 
  • Maj. Gen. Jeannie M. Leavitt will be assigned as chief of safety and commander, Air Force Safety Center, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Leavitt is currently serving as director, operations and communications, Headquarters Air Education and Training Command, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas. 
  • Maj. Gen. Aaron M. Prupas will be assigned as director of defense intelligence for warfighter support, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Prupas is currently serving as director, intelligence and information, J-2, North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, Peterson Air Force Base, Colo. 
  • Maj. Gen. Andrea D. Tullos will be assigned as deputy commander, Headquarters Air Education and Training Command, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas. Tullos is currently serving as commander, Second Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Keesler Air Force Base, Miss. 
  • Maj. Gen. (select) Michael L. Downs will be assigned as deputy director, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations; and director, Joint Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Operations Center, J-32, Joint Staff, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Downs is currently serving as vice director, intelligence, J-2, Joint Staff, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Maj. Gen. (select) Thomas K. Hensley will be assigned as deputy director, operations, National Security Agency, Fort George Meade, Md. Hensley is currently serving as director, J-2, Headquarters U.S. European Command, Combined, Stuttgart-Vaihingen, Germany.
  • Maj. Gen. (select) Michael E. Martin will be assigned as commanding general, Special Operations Command Korea, U.S. Special Operations Command, Camp Kim, Yongsan Garrison, South Korea. Martin is currently serving as director, operations, Headquarters Air Force Special Operations Command, Hurlburt Field, Fla.
  • Maj. Gen. (select) Clark J. Quinn will be assigned as assistant deputy commander, U.S. Air Forces Central Command; and assistant vice commander, 9th Air Expeditionary Task Force, Air Combat Command, Shaw Air Force Base, S.C. Quinn is currently serving as deputy director, plans and policy, DJ5, Headquarters U.S. Central Command, MacDill Air Force Base, Fla. 
  • Maj. Gen. (select) Daniel H. Tulley will be assigned as vice director, joint force development, Joint Staff, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Tulley is currently serving as commander, 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, U.S. Air Forces Central Command, Air Combat Command, Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar.
  • Brig. Gen. David W. Abba will be assigned as director, Department of Defense Special Access Programs Central Office; and director, Special Programs, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Abba is currently serving as director, F-35 Integration Office, Office of the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. Christopher R. Amrhein will be assigned as vice commander, 19th Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas. Amrhein is currently serving as inspector general, Headquarters Air Mobility Command, Scott Air Force Base, Ill. 
  • Brig. Gen. Jason R. Armagost will be assigned as director, strategic plans, programs, and requirements, Headquarters Air Force Global Strike Command, Barksdale Air Force Base, La. Armagost is currently serving as director,  operations and communications, Headquarters Air Force Global Strike Command, Barksdale Air Force Base, La.
  • Brig. Gen. Charles D. Bolton will be assigned as chief, Global Operations Center, Headquarters U.S. Transportation Command, Scott Air Force Base, Ill. Bolton is currently serving as deputy director, operations, strategic deterrence and nuclear integration, Headquarters Air Mobility Command, Scott Air Force Base, Ill. 
  • Brig. Gen. Julian C. Cheater will be assigned as commander, NATO Air Command-Afghanistan; deputy commander, air, U.S. Forces-Afghanistan; commander, 9th Air and Space Expeditionary Task Force-Afghanistan; and director, Air Forces Central Command Air Component Coordination Element for U.S. Forces-Afghanistan, Kabul, Afghanistan. Cheater is currently serving as deputy director, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations; and director, Joint Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Operations Center, J-32, Joint Staff, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. Brenda P. Cartier will be assigned as director, operations and communications, Headquarters Air Education and Training Command, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas. Cartier is currently serving as vice commander, 19th Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas.
  • Brig. Gen. Matthew W. Davidson will be assigned as director, operations, Headquarters Air Force Special Operations Command, Hurlburt Field, Fla. Davidson is currently serving as deputy commander, Special Operations Joint Task Force-Afghanistan, U.S. Central Command, Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan. 
  • Brig. Gen. Eric P. Delange will be assigned as director, cyberspace operations, Headquarters North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, Peterson Air Force Base, Colo. Delange is currently serving as director, cyberspace operations, Deputy Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Cyber Effects Operations, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C.
  • Brig. Gen. Russell D. Driggers will be assigned as director, air, space, and cyberspace operations, Headquarters Air Force Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Driggers is currently serving as deputy commander, NATO Mission Iraq, U.S. Central Command, Baghdad, Iraq. 
  • Brig. Gen. Jeffrey H. Hurlbert will be assigned as commandant, National War College, National Defense University, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, D.C.  Hurlbert is currently serving as deputy inspector general of the Air Force, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. John M. Klein Jr. will be assigned as chief of staff, Headquarters Air Mobility Command, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. Klein is currently serving as director, Central Command Deployment and Distribution Operations Center, U.S. Central Command, Camp Arifjan, Kuwait. 
  • Brig. Gen. Laura L. Lenderman will be assigned as director, operations, strategic deterrence, and nuclear integration, Headquarters Air Mobility Command, Scott Air Force Base, Ill. Lenderman is currently serving as director, plans, programs, and requirements, Headquarters Air Education and Training Command, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas. 
  • Brig. Gen. Joseph D. McFall will be assigned as senior military advisor to the assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, Department of State, Washington, D.C. McFall is currently serving as assistant deputy commander, U.S. Air Forces Central Command; and assistant vice commander, 9th Air Expeditionary Task Force, Air Combat Command, Shaw Air Force Base, S.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. Albert G. Miller will be assigned as director, training and readiness, Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Miller is currently serving as chief of staff, Headquarters Air Mobility Command, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. 
  • Brig. Gen. David A. Mineau will be assigned as vice commander, Fifteenth Air Force, Air Combat Command, Shaw Air Force Base, S.C. Mineau is currently serving as director, current operations, Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. Paul D. Moga will be assigned as commandant of cadets, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colo. Moga is currently serving as deputy director of operations, U.S. Northern Command, Headquarters North American Aerospace Defense and U.S. Northern Command, Peterson Air Force Base, Colo. 
  • Brig. Gen. Paul J. Murray will be assigned as deputy director of operations, J-3, Headquarters North American Aerospace Defense Command, Peterson Air Force Base, Colo. Murray is currently serving as inspector general, Headquarters Air Combat Command, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va. 
  • Brig. Gen. Derek J. O’Malley will be assigned as deputy commander, Canadian North American Aerospace Defense Region; and deputy Combined/Joint Force Air Component commander for the 1st Canadian Air Division, North American Aerospace Defense Command, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. O’Malley is currently serving as commander, 455th Air Expeditionary Wing, U.S. Air Forces Central Command, Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan. 
  • Brig. Gen. Evan L. Pettus will be assigned as vice commander, U.S. Air Force Warfare Center, Air Combat Command, Nellis Air Force Base, Nev. Pettus is currently serving as commander, 378th Air Expeditionary Wing, Air Combat Command, Prince Sultan Air Base, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 
  • Brig. Gen. Neil R. Richardson will be assigned as deputy director, operations, strategic deterrence, and nuclear integration, Headquarters Air Mobility Command, Scott Air Force Base, Ill. Richardson is currently serving as chief, Air Force Senate Liaison Office, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. Jennifer M. Short will be assigned as deputy director, strategic planning and policy, J-5, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Camp H.M. Smith, Hawaii. Short is currently serving as chief of staff, Pacific Air Forces, Headquarters Pacific Air Forces, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.
  • Brig. Gen. Ernest J. Teichert III will be assigned as assistant deputy to the under secretary of the Air Force for international affairs, Office of the Undersecretary of the Air Force, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Teichert is currently serving as senior defense official and defense attaché-Iraq, U.S. Embassy, Baghdad, Iraq. 
  • Brig. Gen. Claude K. Tudor Jr. will be assigned as chief of staff, Pacific Air Forces, Headquarters Pacific Air Forces, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. Tudor is currently serving as director, Integrated Resilience Office, Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. Parker H. Wright will be assigned as director, intelligence and information, J-2, North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, Peterson Air Force Base, Colo. Wright is currently serving as director, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations, Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Cyber Effects Operations, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. (select) Tad D. Clark will be assigned as director, electromagnetic spectrum superiority, Deputy Chief of Staff, Strategy, Integration, and Requirements, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Clark is currently serving as senior executive officer to the vice chief of staff, U.S. Air Force, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. (select) George T.M. Dietrich III will be assigned as director, logistics, engineering and force protection, Headquarters U.S. Air Forces Europe and Air Forces Africa, Ramstein Air Base, Germany. Dietrich is currently serving as deputy director, resource integration, Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Engineering and Force Protection, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. (select) Melissa S. Cunningham will be assigned as director, cyberspace operations, Deputy Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Cyber Effects Operations, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Cunningham is currently serving as chief, Cyberspace Operations Branch, Joint Staff, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. (select) Brian S. Hartless will be assigned as deputy director, resource integration, Deputy Chief of Staff, Logistics, Engineering, and Force Protection, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Hartless is currently serving as commander, 10th Air Base Wing, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colo. 
  • Brig. Gen. (select) Debra A. Lovette will be assigned as director, Integrated Resilience Office, Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Lovette is currently serving as director, Executive Action Group, Office of the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
  • Brig. Gen. (select) Robert A. Masaitis will be assigned as chief innovation officer and deputy director, integration and innovation, Deputy Chief of Staff, Strategy, Integration and Requirements, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Masaitis is currently serving as commander, 27th Special Operations Wing, Air Force Special Operations Command, Cannon Air Force Base, N.M..
  • Brig. Gen. (select) Michael A. Miller will be assigned as director, operations and communications, Headquarters Air Force Global Strike Command, Barksdale Air Force Base, La. Miller is currently serving as chief of staff, Headquarters Air Force Global Strike Command, Barksdale Air Force Base, La. 
  • Brig. Gen. (select) Max E. Pearson will be assigned as director, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations, Deputy Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance and Cyber Effects Operations, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. Pearson is currently serving as senior military assistant to the under secretary of defense for intelligence, Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
Using 5G to Create a ‘Disaggregated and Distributed’ AOC

Using 5G to Create a ‘Disaggregated and Distributed’ AOC

The Air Force is experimenting with the use of 5G technology to provide mobile, distributed command and control, and it eventually hopes to be able to do away altogether with fixed location air operations centers, according to the service’s deputy chief technology officer.

“Today’s air operation centers are static, easy targets to hit that are considered a huge … liability. There’s no resilience there,” James “Rob” Beutel said April 7.

He told a virtual event on 5G staged by AFCEA DC that experimental deployments at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., used special portable cell towers that could be stood up and torn down in less than an hour. “We’re looking at being able to modularize the entire air operation center or any other C2 node that’s out there … [It’s] disaggregated and distributed command and control.”

The enormous bandwidth and ultra high speed data transport offered by 5G made it possible to imagine AOC operations being dispersed over several geographic locations and even being made mobile, without any fixed location at all.

“You can not only disperse it, but keep it on the move and make it very difficult for an adversary to deal with—whether it’s via kinetic or any other type of effect you’re trying to bring against us,” Beutel said.

The $22 million, three-year experiment uses infrastructure built by AT&T. The plan and later the contract were unveiled last year, but this is the first time officials have discussed progress this year.

Nellis is one of a series of 12 experimental deployments of 5G technology that the Air Force announced in two batches last year.

Beutel said another of the deployments, at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, would install 5G connectivity on the flightline, and specifically for aircraft maintenance. “With today’s aircraft, there’s a tremendous amount of data onboard, that even when the plane lands, it’s hard to get off … 5G is going to allow us to get that large amount of data off [the aircraft], get it off quickly, [and] be able to analyze it right there at the edge.”

On-the-spot analysis of aeroengine data using artificial intelligence, for example, would enable maintainers to “immediately determine whether issues have occurred before, … increasing our resilience,” he said. 5G technology also would allow the deployment of new mobile headsets for maintainers, bringing them virtual and augmented reality capabilities. “So that while they’re working on a part, it’s not just static documentation they’re working from, but 3D models” that overlay the real item. The equipment would also offer “remote communication with subject matter experts when they’re dealing with the toughest problems, to be able to get at things immediately.”

Current readiness levels of about 75 to 80 percent “could significantly increase” as a result of the new technologies, slashing costs, Beutel said.

The experiments showcased the “hybrid approach” being taken across DOD to 5G technology, Beutel said—where commercial providers would provide conventional utility-style phone service on bases, for individual customers and for the military enterprise.

“We’re looking at a lot of cases where we’re still going to want to have 5G as a service”—akin to the way the Air Force is now buying enterprise IT as a service, he said. “We’re finding that it becomes almost more of a commodity from the network piece of it. It’s what we do with it on top of it that we would need to keep in house, and I think that’s one of the interesting things about 5G. There’s going to be portions of it that it obviously makes sense to commoditize, and there’s going to be things that we’re going to want to keep a close hold on, the secret sauce, if you will.”

Because 5G enables a network to be divided—not just into core versus periphery, but into horizontal “slices,” it’s easily imaginable that the DOD could run its own unique services over a commodity 5G network.

However, some elements of 5G deployment, Beutel acknowledged, the military would have to handle on its own—like expeditionary force deployments in a hot zone. “That is just something we’re going to have to own ourselves. I don’t know that there’s going to be too many 5G service providers out there that are going to want to, you know, tag along, maybe almost like a reporter would, to provide 5G services [at the front line]. I don’t think that’s a likelihood.”

Taliban Targets Kandahar Airfield in ‘Disruptive’ Attack

Taliban Targets Kandahar Airfield in ‘Disruptive’ Attack

The Taliban targeted Kandahar Airfield, Afghanistan, with rockets on April 7, and though no casualties were reported, the Pentagon said the attack is a threat to fragile peace discussions in the country.

Preliminary reports showed the rockets landed outside the perimeter of the airfield, with no casualties and no damage, Pentagon spokesman John F. Kirby said. Kandahar has served as a key airfield for U.S. forces and has been the headquarters of Train, Advise, Assist Command-South, with American and NATO forces based on the installation.

“We always have the right of self-defense for our troops, but our focus right now is on supporting a diplomatic process here to try to bring this war to a negotiated end with an enduring peace,” Kirby said.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack, which comes less than a month before the deadline for U.S. forces to completely withdraw from Afghanistan.

President Joe Biden has repeatedly said it would be difficult to meet the May 1 deadline, and that the U.S. is in discussions with allies about the timeline. White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said April 6 that Biden’s view has “consistently” been to end the war in Afghanistan.

“That should hopefully give people confidence about his commitments,” she said. “But it’s also an important decision—one he needs to make in close consultation with our allies and also with our national security team here in this administration. And we want to give him the time to do that.”

Kirby said the U.S. military needs to do a fuller assessment of “what happened and why, before any potential operational decision is made” to respond.

“I can’t deliver a comprehensive analysis of what we believe they were trying to achieve or what message they were trying to send,” Kirby said. “We condemn the attack and we believe this decision to provoke even more violence remains disruptive.”

Kandahar has hosted scores of USAF aircraft, including A-10s, E-11s, F-16s, KC-135s, C-130s, and MQ-9s, among others. However, since the U.S.-Taliban agreement in February 2020, Air Forces Central Command and U.S. Forces-Afghanistan have not provided details on the presence at the airfield. Airfield operations are controlled by Afghanistan.

Coleman Takes Over as USAF’s Chief Scientist

Coleman Takes Over as USAF’s Chief Scientist

The Air Force has a new chief scientist: Victoria Coleman, who most recently was the director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Coleman started in her role as the 37th chief scientist of the Air Force last week, and was ceremoniously sworn in by Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. on April 6. Coleman served as the leader of DARPA from November 2020 to Inauguration Day in January. She replaced Richard J. Joseph, who served in the role since 2018.

Coleman, a native of Greece, spent decades serving in both academic and business roles. Before DARPA, she served as the chief executive officer of Atlas AI, as the chief technology officer of the Wikimedia Foundation, and previously worked in leadership roles for several Silicon Valley technology companies. She also served on the Defense Science Board and co-chaired a review panel on the Air Force’s 2019 Science and Technology 2030 strategy.

“I don’t think I ever had a boss that I didn’t get into trouble with for doing all this work for the DOD,” Coleman said in a November 2020 interview with Air Force Magazine. “Then you wake up one day, and you think, ‘Oh, if I really enjoy doing this so much,’ which I did, and ‘if it’s so meaningful to me, why don’t I just do it for a living?’”

In her brief time leading DARPA, Coleman launched a 90-day review focusing on future priorities, and pressed to increase the diversity of the agency.

“I want to make sure that we have as diverse a workforce as possible, because we are so much smarter, so much more likely to succeed, if we have representation from all communities,” she said.

U.S., Iraqi Officials Agree to Talk Timeline for Withdrawal of American Troops

U.S., Iraqi Officials Agree to Talk Timeline for Withdrawal of American Troops

U.S. and Iraqi officials agreed to start talks on the eventual removal of American combat troops from Iraq as Iraqi Security Forces grow in capacity, during a joint strategic discussion April 7.

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and Iraqi Minister of Foreign Affairs Fuad Hussein led the virtual discussion aimed at reaffirming relationships between the two countries, including on security and counterterrorism, among other areas. The sides agreed to further bilateral security coordination, with a light at the end of the tunnel for combat deployments to the country.

“Based on the increasing capacity of the ISF, the parties confirmed that the mission of U.S. and Coalition forces has now transitioned to one focused on training and advisory tasks, thereby allowing for the redeployment of any remaining combat forces from Iraq, with the timing to be established in upcoming technical talks,” the U.S. and Iraq governments said in a joint statement.

Pentagon spokesman John F. Kirby, in an April 7 briefing, said there is no specific timeline for when combat troops would leave, and the subsequent talks have not yet been scheduled.

The communique from the dialogue is a “reaffirmation of the partnership that we have enjoyed with Iraq and the significance of the mission that still exists against ISIS,” Kirby said.

The U.S. has always been in Iraq at the invitation of the Iraqi government, and there was never an expectation that the American footprint would be permanent or enduring. Eventually, when the time is appropriate, U.S. forces would leave.

“The idea that there would eventually be a redeployment is not new,” Kirby said.

There are 2,500 U.S. forces in Iraq, who are there to advise and assist Iraqi forces. U.S. officials have not said how many of those troops serve in combat roles. The Defense Department Inspector General for Operation Inherent Resolve, in its most recent report, states that U.S. troops remain at the Baghdad Diplomatic Security Complex in Baghdad, al-Asad Air Base, and Erbil Air Base in the northern Kurdish region.

Kirby would not say if the redeployment of American troops out of Iraq would impact the ability to conduct airstrikes in the country.

“The transition of U.S. and other international forces away from combat operations to training, equipping, and assisting the ISF reflects the success of their strategic partnership and ensures support to the ISF’s continued efforts to ensure ISIS can never again threaten Iraq’s stability,” the communique states.

GBSD Passes Integrated Baseline Review, on Pace for IOC In 2029

GBSD Passes Integrated Baseline Review, on Pace for IOC In 2029

Northrop Grumman successfully completed the integrated baseline review for the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent program, which is on track for initial operational capability by 2029.

The integrated baseline review sets the cost and schedule baseline, identifies risk, and ensures there are mitigation plans ready for the program. It occurs within 180 days of contract award. The company and the Air Force worked together early in the process to meet the deadline, according to an April 7 Northrop release.

“Given the sheer size and importance of schedule integration, we had to be agile in meeting this critical milestone, there is no margin for delay,” said Steve Lunny, Northrop’s vice president for the GBSD program, in the release. “Early on, we worked with the Air Force, shoulder-to-shoulder in a virtual setting, to engage at a deeper level and share critical insights throughout IBR to mitigate risks, arrive at a common baseline, and ultimately save time.”

Northrop was awarded a $13.3 billion engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) contract in September 2020, and the Air Force recently signed off on the company’s design for the missile.

The GBSD program will include about 660 new missiles to replace aging Minuteman III ICBMs, along with upgrades to silos and alert centers.

USAF and Defense Department leaders have repeatedly emphasized the importance of GBSD as part of overall nuclear modernization. The Biden administration, however, is expected to take a critical look at the cost of this modernization, as Pentagon budgets are likely to stay flat or decrease.