No Injuries After C-17 Catches Fire at JB Charleston

No Injuries After C-17 Catches Fire at JB Charleston

No one was hurt when a C-17 caught fire after landing April 9 at Joint Base Charleston, S.C.

Seven crew members and one passenger were returning from an overseas mission when the C-17 landed at the base and caught fire, causing substantial damage to the Globemaster III. Videos and photographs posted online showed flames burning on the aircraft’s landing gear and black smoke rising from under its left wing.

https://twitter.com/breakingavnews/status/1380775462113312769

“Base personnel quickly extinguished the fire, preventing further damage to the aircraft,” Joint Base Charleston public affairs said in a statement.

The video shows the C-17 parked next to more aircraft, but the fire did not spread. The cause of the incident remains under investigation.

JB Charleston, one of the Air Force’s largest C-17 bases, hosts the Active-duty 437th Airlift Wing and Reserve 315th Airlift Wing. 

Pilot Mixed Up MQ-9 Controls in June 2020 Crash

Pilot Mixed Up MQ-9 Controls in June 2020 Crash

An MQ-9 pilot pulled a wrong lever as the Reaper was taking off in Syracuse, N.Y., causing the remotely piloted aircraft to lose fuel supply and crash in June 2020, according to an Air Force investigation.

The MQ-9 was “significantly damaged” at a cost of $6.085 million in the crash at Hancock Field Air National Guard Base, which shares its flight line with Syracuse Hancock International Airport. There were no injuries.

On June 25, 2020, the MQ-9, tail number 15-4295 from the 108th Attack Squadron, 174th Attack Wing of the New York Air National Guard, took off for a training flight. About seven seconds after becoming airborne, the aircraft lost all engine power.

The Air Force Accident Investigation Board found that the pilot, instead of pushing the flap lever forward to reduce flaps during takeoff, pulled the condition lever backwards, which caused the fuel supply to the engine to be cut off. When the pilot realized the engine lost power, the crew began going through the Critical Action Procedures checklist for engine failure.

The pilot “continued to misidentify the appropriate lever and pulled the Flap Lever to full aft or back,” the report state. About 21 seconds after losing power, the MQ-9 crashed, striking airport runway lights, and spinnng 180 degrees before coming to a rest about 600 feet off the departure end of the runway, the report states.

USAF investigators found the primary cause of the crash was the pilot misidentifying the levers. Additionally, the investigation found that the design of the MQ-9’s ground control station contributed to the mix-up, because there are no markings, color differentiations, or safety guards that set apart the condition lever and flap lever, which are close to each other in the GCS.

The pilot had 705.1 hours in the MQ-9 and was qualified as an instructor at the time of the mishap.

Hawaii F-22s Wrap Up Deployment to Japan

Hawaii F-22s Wrap Up Deployment to Japan

F-22s and Airmen from Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, forward deployed to Japan for almost one month to train with Japanese and U.S. Marine Corps aircraft as part of a “dynamic force employment” operation.

The Raptors from the Active-duty 19th Fighter Squadron and Air National Guard 199th Fighter Squadron deployed to Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni from March 12 through April 5.

The dynamic force employment model is designed for USAF aircraft to quickly deploy unannounced to operate from unpredictable locations.

“This [deployment] allows our pilots and maintainers to train alongside one another, learn and apply best practices, and ensure the joint force remains agile and responsive in the Pacific,” said USAF Lt. Col. Brian Nash, F-22 detachment commander at MCAS-Iwakuni, in a Pacific Air Forces release

At Iwakuni, the F-22s were co-located with USMC F-35Bs.

“The presence of the U.S. Air Force’s F-22s here at Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni provides a gainful opportunity for our F-35B pilots to practice joint integration between these two state-of-the-art aircraft,” said Lt. Col. Richard Behrmann, Marine Aircraft Group 12 operations officer, in a release. “Regular training and integration with joint service, partner and allied forces is one of the many ways that we maintain a high level of readiness and ensure that we can provide valuable contributions to maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific region.”

Utah KC-135s Deploy to the Middle East

Utah KC-135s Deploy to the Middle East

Utah Air National Guard KC-135s and Airmen deployed to the Middle East on April 5-6 to support combat operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.

The four KC-135s and 120 Airmen from the 151st Air Refueling Wing will support Operation Inherent Resolve—the ongoing fight against the Islamic State group, Operation Freedom’s Sentinel in Afghanistan, and Spartan Shield—the overall U.S. mission in Southwest Asia.

As part of a new KC-135 and C-130 deployment model, the 151st Maintenance Group is deploying as one overall group as opposed to a combined deployed group of Airmen from different units, according to a Utah Air National Guard release.

Air Mobility Command in 2019 adopted the deployment model of sending whole units to promote cohesion and ensure better predictability.

“Going as a group, we can take care of our people,” said Master Sgt. Roger Tyler, superintendent of the unit, in the release. “We know who our people are, and we’ll be able to recognize when someone is stressed or going through a difficult time while being away from their families. Our Airmen are more likely to open up and have difficult conversations because familiar faces will surround them.”

Biden to Request $715 Billion for DOD, Eliminate the OCO Account

Biden to Request $715 Billion for DOD, Eliminate the OCO Account

President Joe Biden will request $715 billion for the Pentagon in his first budget request in office, about a $10 billion increase from the 2021 enacted budget but below the sustained growth military officials have asked for.

Notably, Biden’s budget looks to do away with the “overseas contingency operations” fund, marking a significant shift in military funding. The OCO is intended to fund wartime operations, but critics have long lamented it’s nothing more than a slush fund for more defense spending. Biden wants to move that wartime funding back to the base budget.

Former President Donald J. Trump, for example, requested $705 billion in his last budget for the Pentagon, plus $69 billion in OCO funding. Congress appropriated $636.4 billion for the Pentagon’s base budget, $25.9 billion for national security programs within the Department of Energy, and $69 billion for the Overseas Contingency Operations account.

The White House Office of Management and Budget on April 9 released a “skinny” budget outline, with limited details of what to expect in the forthcoming overall budget request. Biden’s budget includes $753 billion total for national defense, including the Pentagon budget and other defense-related programs, such as the National Nuclear Security Administration.

Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.), chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committees defense panel, said the proposed 1.5 percent increase for the Department of Defense “will sustain readiness and modernization while we also focus on divesting from ineffective legacy programs and eliminating wasteful spending.”

“I applaud President Biden’s proposed budget for its strong and responsible investments in critical domestic priorities and essential national security needs,” McCollum added in a statement released April 9. “The President understands that the health, economic, climate, and equity crises facing our country must be addressed with bold action.”

OMB, in its statement, states the funding will “defend America and deter adversaries while ensuring America is positioned for strategic competition.” While it does not outline specific efforts, the administration said it will support “ongoing nuclear modernization programs,” which would include the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent, while it also reviews the overall U.S. nuclear posture.

The administration also plans to divest “legacy systems and programs to redirect resources from low- to high-priority programs, platforms, and systems,” though OMB did not specifically mention which platforms would be affected. The Air Force has long tried to cut legacy aircraft, such as KC-10s and A-10s, to free up funding for newer systems.

“Some legacy force structure is too costly to maintain and operate, and no longer provides the capabilities needed to address national security challenges,” OMB states. “The discretionary request enables DOD to reinvest savings associated with divestitures and other efficiencies to higher priority investments.”

The budget would continue the military’s overall effort to focus on the threat from China as the DOD’s top challenge, while also deterring Russia, by funding the Pacific Deterrence Initiative and working closely with allies and partners in both the Pacific and in NATO.

The request will support DOD research and development, by prioritizing funding “to invest in breakthrough technologies that would drive innovation and underpin the development of next-generation defense capabilities.”

The Biden administration will invest in a “mix” of long-range strike capabilities, a sign that it will continue funding U.S. Army efforts in this area in addition to continued USAF programs.

“The discretionary request invests in the development and testing of hypersonic strike capabilities while enhancing existing long-range strike capabilities to bolster deterrence and improve survivability and response timelines,” the document states.

Additionally, the budget request will “ensure readiness” with funding for training, promote climate resilience, counter emerging biological threats, support military families, and optimize U.S. Naval shipbuilding, according to OMB.

The lack of funding growth when adjusted for inflation elicited quick criticism from Republicans on Capitol Hill. In a joint statement, Sens. Jim Inhofe (Okla.), Mitch McConnell (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), and Richard Shelby (Ala.) said without more funding, China will out-compete the U.S.

“President Biden’s budget proposal cuts defense spending, sending a terrible signal not only to our adversaries in Beijing and Moscow, but also to our allies and partners. Cutting America’s defense budget completely undermines Washington Democrats’ tough talk on China and calls into question the administration’s willingness to confront the Chinese Communist Party,” the senators wrote.

DOD Announces First Steps to Address Extremism After Stand Downs

DOD Announces First Steps to Address Extremism After Stand Downs

Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III on April 9 announced interim steps to counter extremism in the ranks following Defense Department-wide stand downs to discuss the issue, including updating DOD guidance on what defines extremist behavior as well as questionnaires that prospective service members fill out.

In the aftermath of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, Austin ordered the stand downs and a review of DOD policies regarding extremism. Now, he has created a Countering Extremism Working Group to discuss future actions to continue to address the issue, the Pentagon announced.

The immediate actions that Austin ordered are:

  • Updating DOD Instruction 1325.06 to more specifically define “extremist behavior.”
  • Updating the Service Member Transition Checklist to include training on potential targeting of service members by extremist groups. Create a way for veterans to report any contact with an extremist group if they choose. Each military department will update and standardize the questionnaire to “solicit specific information about current or previous extremist behavior,” according to the release
  • Commission a study on extremist behavior in the total force, so the DOD can better understand the scope of the problem.

Bishop Garrison, the senior adviser to the Secretary of Defense on Human Capital and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, will oversee the working group to look at mid- and long-term recommendations. The group will look at four lines of effort: military justice and policy, support and oversight of the insider threat program, screening capability, and education and training.

USAF Assesses Damage from Destructive Winter Storms

USAF Assesses Damage from Destructive Winter Storms

Winter storms caused more than $4 million in damage to Air Force Global Strike Command bases, with 28 total Air Force installations impacted by the weather earlier this year.

The storms contributed to large-scale damage at multiple installations across the south in February, while heavy snow impacted operations at several bases. The storms come as the Air Force is assessing how it can better prepare its bases for extreme weather, through installation energy plans or resilience exercises.

“We’re continuing to assess damage and are committed to restoring facilities to full mission capability,” said Brig. Gen. John J. Allen Jr., commander of the Air Force Civil Engineer Center, during a March 26 House Armed Services readiness subcommittee hearing.

AFGSC in an April 6 news release outlined the damage that several of its bases received during the winter storm: F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo.; Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont.; Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D.; Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo.; Minot Air Force Base, N.D.; Dyess Air Force Base, Texas; Barksdale Air Force Base, La.; and Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., took damage estimated from $20,000 to more than $1 million. The command estimates total damage to be more than $4 million.

Dyess was hardest hit, with more than $1.4 million in damage. AFGSC said installations in places such as Texas and Louisiana are not designed for temperatures that fall below zero, and suffered from burst pipes and other problems causing several issues, including loss of drinkable water. In response, civil engineers from six other Air Force bases came to Dyess to help by replacing drywall, fixing plumbing and heating, and repairing ventilation and air conditioning units, according to the release.

At northern missile bases such as F.E. Warren, heavy snow was the culprit. A March storm dropped more than 36 inches of snow, which impacted operations even though the installation is no stranger to heavy snow.

“AFGSC successfully withstood many challenges in the past year, and this storm is no different,” said Chief Master Sgt. Charles R. Hoffman, AFGSC’s command chief master sergeant, in the release. “Our Striker Airmen are resilient and remain ready. As with all challenges, during the storm they took care of the mission and each other. As we go forward, we will look at lessons learned and better prepare ourselves for the future.”

Allen, in testimony to the House panel, said recent storms such as these, along with the hurricane that caused immense destruction at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., in 2018 and heavy flooding at Offutt Air Force Base, Neb., in 2019 showed that the Air Force needs to better prepare for threats from climate change as well as from potential adversaries.

“We must continually learn from these events and adapt to meet current and future threats to our installations posed by severe weather and climate, as well as physical or cyber-attacks,” he said.

Ellsworth B-1s Fly Direct to Aegean Sea

Ellsworth B-1s Fly Direct to Aegean Sea

Two B-1B Lancers returned to Europe for a bomber task force flight on April 7, shortly after USAF bombers returned home from the continent after a deployment.

The Lancers from Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D., flew directly to the Aegean Sea and returned home in a 12,000 nautical mile round-trip flight. During the mission, F-16s from Aviano Air Base, Italy, escorted the bombers before flying over the Aegean Sea, according to a U.S. Air Forces in Europe release. Photographs show the B-1s linking up with KC-135s from RAF Mildenhall, England, during the mission.

“U.S. security commitments to the NATO alliance remain ironclad,” said Maj. Gen. Lance Landrum, U.S. European Command director of operations, in a release. “Today’s Bomber Task Force mission is another in a long list of examples of how America’s military forces sustain readiness, improve interoperability, and demonstrate our nation’s ability to deliver on commitments from across the Atlantic.”

The flight comes about two weeks after B-1s from Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, completed a Bomber Task Force deployment to Norway—a first for the bomber. During the deployment, the bombers flew with 11 allies and partner nations in Europe and the Arctic, landed in Poland for the first time, and conducted the first hot-pit and warm-pit refuels in the theater, according to a Dyess release. At the same time, B-2s from Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., deployed to Lajes Field, Portugal, as part of the USAFE bomber task force.

USSF Unveils Space Systems Command’s Structure

USSF Unveils Space Systems Command’s Structure

The Space Force’s new Space Systems Command will oversee the new service’s acquisition and launch services under one command, with the soon-to-be-former Space and Missile Systems Center serving as its headquarters.

Space Systems Command, one of three commands within the Space Force, will officially stand up this summer after a commander is nominated and confirmed. SMC’s current offices at Los Angeles Air Force Base, Calif., will be the headquarters, and launch operations at Patrick Space Force Base, Fla., and Vandenberg Space Force Base, Calif., will be realigned under the SSC.

The overall goal of the organization is to acquire and launch space systems more quickly. The SSC will work directly with the Air Force Research Laboratory and other groups like the Rapid Capabilities Office.

“We have to go fast,” Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond said during an April 8 press conference. “It is a national imperative that we go fast.”

Under the new design, SSC will be commanded by a three-star general with a two-star deputy who will serve as the “assured access to space leader” overseeing the launch enterprise. Once officially stood up, more units from the Air Force and personnel from other services will re-designate to part of the SSC. There will not be any geographic moves of units as part of the establishment, and current SMC boss Lt. Gen. John F. Thompson said the change is intended to be resource neutral.

The announcement comes about a year and a half after SMC redesigned itself into SMC 2.0 with the goal of acquiring space systems faster. There are about 6,000 personnel in SMC now, and once the launch bases are realigned under SSC, the command will grow to between 10,000-11,000, Thompson said.

Additional changes include:

  • The 61st Air Base Group at Los Angeles Air Force Base will be redesignated the Los Angeles Garrison.
  • The 30th Space Wing at Vandenberg will become Space Launch Delta 30 and the 45th Space Wing at Patrick will become Space Launch Delta 45.
  • SLD 45’s commander will be a one-star USSF general, director of the eastern range, SSC operations director, and acquisition lead for the “range of the future.”
  • Group-level organizations at the 30th and 45th SW will inactivate, with subordinate units aligning under the Deltas.
  • The 45th Range Squadron at Patrick will be redesignated the 1st Range Operations Squadron, and the airfield management and maintenance responsibilities will be transferred to the 45th Logistics Readiness Squadron.
  • AFRL unit manpower and funding that perform space science and technology functions will be administratively controlled by SSC, but will stay aligned to AFRL.
  • The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s Strategic Warning and Surveillance Systems Division will move to SSC.
  • SSC will provide select support to the Space Rapid Capabilities Office at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M.
  • SSC will provide administrative and integration support to the Space Development Agency when it transfers from the Defense Department to the Space Force in October 2022.