Guard C-130 Activated To Fight Western Wildfires

Guard C-130 Activated To Fight Western Wildfires

With more than 1.3 million acres already damaged in wildfires this year and 56 large fires currently raging, the Air National Guard activated a specially-equipped C-130 and crew to aid firefighting efforts across the western U.S.

The National Interagency Fire Center requested the Guard’s help a month earlier than last year, when the 152nd Airlift Wing activated July 29 and remained on duty until Oct. 3, the longest firefighting activation in unit history.

The 2021 wildfire season is expected to be particularly intense due to drought across the West and a recent heatwave.

The C-130 is equipped with the Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System (MAFFS), a roll-on, roll-off system with a massive 3,000-gallon tank that can shoot water or fire retardant out the plane’s rear parachute door in six seconds. The plane uses a cutting-edge NP2000 Propeller System that produces more thrust during takeoff and gives pilots better speed control mid-flight.

“This is especially important for the extremely challenging MAFFS mission, while flying in extreme hazards, including flying low, slow, and heavy while dropping water or retardant,” said Col. Jeremy Ford, 152nd Airlift Wing commander, in a statement.

Flying effectively with MAFFS requires “extremely experienced” pilots, able to fly as slow as 120 knots and as low as 150 feet off the ground, in order to be effective. Flying so low and slow increases turbulence, while plunging into the smoke clouds over fires compromises visibility. The C-130 and its crew will deploy to CAL FIRE’s McClellan Reload Base in Sacramento, Calif. The initial activation lasts through July 26 but could be extended.

As of June 25, NIFC reports 29,773 fires impacting 1,327,950 acres since the start of 2021. It’s the most individual fires recorded at this point in the year since 2011 and the most acres since 2018. Some 616,914 acres are currently affected by fires.

Biden Pledges to Evacuate Afghan Interpreters

Biden Pledges to Evacuate Afghan Interpreters

The Biden administration will evacuate thousands of Afghan interpreters as the U.S. military withdraws from the country, with planning speeding up this week as Afghan leaders visit the White House and the Pentagon.

“We’ve already begun the process,” said President Joe Biden, speaking with reporters outside the White House on June 24. “Those who helped us are not going to be left behind.”

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said earlier this week that about 18,000 people have expressed interest in using the Special Immigrant Visas for Afghans to come to the United States as Afghanistan has grown more violent with Taliban gains.

“The idea here is to be able to facilitate their departure from Afghanistan to another location so that they can complete the SIV process,” Pentagon spokesman John F. Kirby said June 24, adding that it is not known how many could come to the United States.

Kirby said the Defense Department is planning with the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security on what the process could look like and what a possible timeline could be.

While this could involve USAF aircraft, it could also include chartered or leased airplanes. “There’s lots of opportunities here,” Kirby said.

Since the process involves visas, the State Department has the lead. The military, including the National Guard, could be involved in housing and feeding the Afghan immigrants, but that has not been decided, and there has not been a request to identify possible locations, Kirby said.

“The planning will obviously include housing and medical care and obviously sustenance, of course—all those things are going to be factored into the planning here,” Kirby said.

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani arrived in Washington, D.C., this week and met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill on June 24. On June 25, he will head to the Pentagon for a meeting with Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III and to the White House for a meting with Biden.

The meetings will focus on the progress of the withdrawal and what potential future support to the Afghan government could look like.

Kirby said the military is still planning what its presence inside Afghanistan will look like after the withdrawal is finished by the September deadline. The U.S. military footprint will be focused on protecting the embassy in Kabul. “Without getting into specific details, I think it’s safe to assume … in this environment it would be beyond just what you would see at a normal embassy,” he said.

Cotton Nominated to Lead Air Force Global Strike Command

Cotton Nominated to Lead Air Force Global Strike Command

President Joe Biden will nominate Lt. Gen. Anthony J. Cotton to head Air Force Global Strike Command, replacing retiring Gen. Timothy M. Ray, who has led the command since 2018.

A missileer by training, Cotton is currently Ray’s deputy and has previously commanded the 20th Air Force, the 45th Space Wing, and the 341st Missile Wing. He also was commander and president of Air University from February 2018 to October 2019 prior to becoming AFGSC’s deputy commander.

If confirmed, Cotton will take over as the command advances generational modernization efforts including acquisition of a next-generation stealth bomber, the B-21 Raider; development of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent to replace the Air Force’s aging fleet of 400 Minuteman III nuclear-armed missiles; and the next-generation nuclear-tipped cruise missile, the Long-Range Stand-Off Weapon. The service is also beginning to phase out its B-1B Lancer bombers.

Cotton would be only the second missileer to lead AFGSC since its inception in 2009 and the first Black officer ever to lead either this command or its predecessor, Strategic Air Command.

In an interview with Air Force Magazine last summer, he spoke about coming up as a Black officer in the Air Force and the progress he has seen recently in the way the service embraces people of color.

“I am cautiously optimistic that we’ll get after this,” he said, and “not necessarily only from a Department of the Air Force perspective,” he said. “It’s time for our nation to really dive into this and get after it—once and for all. And hopefully, you know, I don’t have to have those conversations with my kids.”

Gunship Crew Nets 5 Distinguished Flying Crosses for High-Risk Afghanistan Mission

Gunship Crew Nets 5 Distinguished Flying Crosses for High-Risk Afghanistan Mission

The Air Force awarded five Distinguished Flying Crosses and four Air Medals to the crew of an AC-130J gunship for a daring mission to help helicopter crews safely evacuate wounded American and Afghan forces during a September 2019 firefight in Afghanistan.

Flying under the callsign Shadow 71, the Ghostrider provided continuous close air support over the course of a two-hour operation, firing on multiple enemy positions as helicopter assault forces flew in to evacuate wounded ground troops, according to a June 22 release.

“I always say gunships are a team sport,” said Shadow 71 aircraft commander Lt. Col. Christopher McCall during an award ceremony at Hurlburt Field, Fla. “You really can’t do something like this without a great team. Shadow 71 has talent from front to back.”

During the ceremony, Distinguished Flying Crosses were awarded to McCall, weapon systems officer Capt. Jasen K. Hrisca, combat systems officer Capt. Tyler D. Larson, lead special missions aviator Tech. Sgt. Jake M. Heathcott, and sensor operator Staff Sgt. Kyle W. Burden.

Four more crew members were awarded the single event Air Medal: co-pilot Maj. Brian D. Courchesne, special missions aviator Staff Sgt. Alex Almarlaes, special missions aviator Senior Airman Brianna S. Striplin, and special missions aviator Senior Airman Thomas I. Fay. 

Air Force Special Operations Command boss Lt. Gen. James C. Slife praised the crew in the release. “Thank you for who you are,” he said. “Thank you for being our examples; thank you for your service to the nation; thank you for your dedication to our mission.”

State Department OKs F-16 Sale to the Philippines

State Department OKs F-16 Sale to the Philippines

The State Department has approved the potential sale of F-16 jets, AGM-84 Harpoon missiles, and AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles, along with other equipment, to the Philippines, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced June 24.

All told, the sales would total up to nearly $2.9 billion, with the majority of those funds going to the sale of a dozen F-16 aircraft and accompanying weaponry and equipment. Two of the jets will be two-seat F-16Ds, and 10 will be F-16Cs. 

Other weapons potentially being sold to the Philippines include a dozen Harpoon missiles and 24 Sidewinder missiles. Lockheed Martin will be the primary contractor for the jets, while Boeing will handle the Harpoon missiles, and Raytheon will handle the Sidewinders.

The foreign arms sales will “support the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a strategic partner that continues to be an important force for political stability, peace, and economic progress in South East Asia,” the agency said in a statement.

The F-16 sale in particular will “improve the Philippines’ capability to meet current and future threats by enabling the Philippines to deploy fighter aircraft with precision munitions in support of counterterrorism operations in the southern Philippines,” the agency said.

Congress will need to approve the sale.

F-16s potentially going to the Philippine air force have been mentioned for years. In 2018, Filipino President Rodrigo Duterte dismissed the idea as “utterly useless,” according to the Associated Press. In December 2019, though, Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana mentioned the F-16 as one of two potential aircraft under consideration.

In December 2020, Armed Forces of the Philippines chief Gen. Gilbert Gapay told reporters in a press briefing that he planned to add a multirole fighter to the fleet before Duterte’s term ended in 2022, according to the Inquirer. The F-16 will be the Philippines’ first multirole fighter. Lockheed Martin has a backlog of more than 100 F-16s for foreign military sales to five countries, including Bahrain, Bulgaria, Slovakia, and Taiwan and a fifth Lockheed Martin has declined to name, potentially putting the aircraft’s sunset years into the 2070s or even later.

Why USAF Wants to Cut ISR Operations in Fiscal 2022

Why USAF Wants to Cut ISR Operations in Fiscal 2022

Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft are among the Air Force’s most-requested assets worldwide, but the service wants to cut back the number of combat air patrols it supports on any given day so it can free up funds in the fiscal 2022 budget to develop next-generation platforms.

Convincing lawmakers, however, will be a challenge.

Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) said in a June 22 hearing that plans to reduce capacity from 60 simultaneous MQ-9 missions to 56 runs counter to what U.S. Central Command and other combatant commanders want, citing CENTCOM’s placement of MQ-9s at the top of its unfunded priorities list in 2020.

Nevada hosts Creech Air Force Base, the Air Force’s main MQ-9 operating base.

Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, testifying June 23 at a House Armed Services Committee hearing, said “what [the Air Force is] really doing is not decreasing the number of tails.” Rather, he explained, USAF is reducing the number of combat lines in maintains—lines that consist of several aircraft each—”so that [USAF] can have the ability to upgrade their capability and network their birds together in ways that we haven’t done before.”

The Air Force argues that MQ-9s will not survive in conflict with more advanced adversaries in the future, but it doesn’t give up the aircraft. Instead, the fiscal 2022 budget request seeks to modernize some of the remotely piloted aircraft while investing in both an “MQ-Next” and new ways to network more ISR sensors together.

“We have to invest in those things that are going to allow us to have resilient forces, to operate in a distributed manner, and to be absolutely lethal in a future fight,” Austin said.

The proposed MQ-9 operations cut has come up repeatedly in recent weeks in Congressional hearings, with multiple lawmakers expressing concern.

Lt. Gen. Joseph T. Guastella, the deputy chief of staff for operations, acknowledged June 22 the “tremendous demand” for airborne ISR from combatant commands and admitted “it’s difficult to get at that requirement with the force we have.” But he emphasized that the ISR enterprise must develop persistent and connected aircraft and that to achieve that objective, the Air Force must balance “today’s capabilities and a modernization effort to get after a peer competitor, because that is not something the MQ-9 was designed to do.”

This thinking goes beyond a single airframe, Maj. Gen. James D. Peccia, the deputy assistant secretary for budget, said May 28 during the Air Force’s budget roll-out briefing.

“What we are looking at is really a family of interconnected systems that we will use in the future,” he said. “That could come from space. It could come from aircraft. It could come from nontraditional means.”

The Air Force is “not looking specifically at a platform-for-platform replacement,” Peccia said. “We’re looking at technology that’s available today to build a survivable ISR platform as we move forward to that 2030 time period.” 

Austin: GBSD’s Future Will Depend on New Nuclear Posture Review

Austin: GBSD’s Future Will Depend on New Nuclear Posture Review

After some lawmakers questioned the need for the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) program, top Defense Department leaders said June 23 that its future will depend on a review of the military’s nuclear posture.

The Pentagon is asking for $1.1 billion to fund the GBSD program in the DOD’s fiscal 2022 budget request, while the first test flight of the Minuteman III replacement is planned for 2023.

Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III faced multiple questions in a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee about the expense of the GBSD and whether it’s needed at this time. Austin said the long-term “valuation” of the program will be part of the Pentagon’s next Nuclear Posture Review (NPR).

“We’ll take a deliberate and earnest look at where we are and where we need to go in the future,” Austin said.

The Defense Department’s last Nuclear Posture Review, released in early 2018, supported the GBSD program along with other new nuclear programs including the B-21 bomber, the Long-Range Standoff Weapon, nuclear command and control, and the Ohio-class submarine replacement. 

These initiatives would also be funded under the administration’s 2022 budget request, which in addition to the GBSD funding also includes $609 million for LRSO.

Austin said the upcoming NPR will include “deliberate work with the services to make sure that we are meeting the most pressing need.” 

The notion that Austin has made any decision on the future of the GBSD is premature, he said. 

“I have not made any decisions on this. I think it deserves the right amount of effort and attention, and we’ll make the best choices,” he said. “But these choices need to be informed by the posture review to make sure we have the right balance here.”

Military officials, including leaders in the Air Force and U.S. Strategic Command, have said modernizing the ICBM leg of the air-land-sea triad is needed and that time is running out. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Mark A. Milley, testifying alongside Austin on June 23, said he does not recommend taking any money away from nuclear modernization. The recapitalization of the triad, including the GBSD, is “critical to our nation’s security,” he said, and delaying it by up to 12 to 15 years would create a gap.

Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.) during the hearing repeated that USAF officials have told him that the lives of current ICBMs can be extended and that a replacement can be delayed into the 2030s. Milley, in response, said his position is that investment in GBSD needs to continue “without delay.”

USAF Approves Moving F-22 Training to Langley Following Environmental Study

USAF Approves Moving F-22 Training to Langley Following Environmental Study

The Air Force has approved Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va., as the new location for F-22 training following the completion of an environmental impact study.

The announcement is another step in the long process of moving Raptor training, which shifted across Florida from Tyndall Air Force Base to Eglin Air Force Base after a massive hurricane in 2018. But while the study and approval mark a crucial step in the process, the move is not official just yet. Air Combat Command said it is still waiting on service leadership to finish its study into tactical aviation requirements, determining which and how many tactical aircraft it wants in the fleet moving forward. Once that is done, the Air Force will make the final decisions on the move.

The F-22 formal training unit, currently part of the 325th Fighter Wing, has been temporarily housed at Eglin since October 2018. That month, Category 5 Hurricane Michael caused catastrophic damage to Tyndall, prompting the Air Force to scatter Tyndall’s F-22s to other bases.

In the wake of that storm and relocation, USAF proposed making Langley the new home of the unit as part of its goal to consolidate its F-22s at fewer locations

That proposal came in March 2019 and was subject to the environmental impact study, which was estimated to take between 24 and 48 months.

Last week, the Air Force notified Congress that the study was complete. It indicates that 28 F-22s and 16 T-38s would move to Langley, along with approximately 760 personnel, including 660 service members. A further 1,672 dependents would also be affected.

Langley is already home to the 1st Fighter Wing, which has two squadrons of F-22s and is responsible for a third of the F-22s in the Air Force.

The environmental impact study also proposes bedding down a second F-35A training unit at Eglin to accompany the one that is already there, with the departure of the F-22 unit making room.

While the exact timing on all these moves is uncertain as the tactical aviation report is conducted, the study laid out a proposed timeline of F-22s moving to Langley from June through October, with the new F-35A unit moving into Eglin in October. That would result in a short overlap during which both units would have airframes at Eglin.

Guard Training, Ops May Halt Without Refund for Capitol Defense

Guard Training, Ops May Halt Without Refund for Capitol Defense

Training, operations, and maintenance for the National Guard will be drastically reduced through the end of the fiscal year—potentially eliminating drill weekends and other operations—if the Guard is not promptly reimbursed for its response to the Jan. 6 insurrection and extended protection of Capitol Hill, the head of the National Guard Bureau warned.

If the National Guard Bureau isn’t provided the $521 million for Operation Capitol Response, then operations through September—the peak of the hurricane and fire seasons, when the Guard is in high demand—will be significantly curtailed, NGB boss Gen. Daniel R. Hokanson said in a June 23 Pentagon press conference.

The amount is “very significant” to the Guard, he said, and “if we don’t get that funding fairly soon, we’ll have to look not only at August but also September, the last two months of the fiscal year, either curtailing completely or drastically reducing our National Guard drill weekends and annual training, as well as our operational maintenance.”

If the money isn’t provided “in a timely manner,” that will have “a very significant impact on National Guard readiness,” he said. The Guard is working closely with Congress to get the money appropriated, he said.

The National Guard Bureau sent a memo to Congress stating that if the funding is not provided by July 1, units nationwide and in U.S. territories will be ordered to prepare to cease some operations and cancel drills from August through September 30, with training in July also potentially curtailed. This would include courses and schools already underway. The Air National Guard could be forced to cut back on two weeks of flying, Military.com reported.

It’s “critical” that it comes in this fiscal year because the funding is “required … to complete not only our drills but all operations and training we have scheduled” through the end of September, he said.

As part of the operation, approximately 26,000 Army and Air National Guard personnel deployed to defend Capitol Hill after the Capitol building itself was stormed by supporters of former President Donald J. Trump. Hokanson said Guard members deployed from every state as well as Guam and the District of Columbia to the operation. The troops erected barriers around Capitol Hill and stood ready to repel further assaults and stayed on for nearly four months after the inauguration of President Joe Biden.

Hokanson answered criticism that the Guard did not respond rapidly enough to the Capitol crisis. The organization is structured such that Guard members get called up, go to their armory, get issued equipment, get a briefing on what they’re headed out to do, and may even get some last-minute training, usually in the space of 24 hours, he said.

“We’re not a SWAT team. … We’re not law enforcement,” he said.  

“We’re manned, trained, and equipped to fight our nation’s wars,” he added. “We can’t get into that perception that we are immediate response, because we’re not resourced to do that. Twenty-four hours is when we can start marshalling our organization.”

He rejected the idea that a quicker, on-call response force be created in the Guard, saying that full-time Guard members are there “to train and administer our organizations. They’re not trained for anything else.”

Hokanson acknowledged the Guard is heavily in demand, but when asked how it will handle a reduction of 500 troops called for the in the fiscal 2022 budget, he said such decisions are the purview of the Secretaries of the Air Force and Army.

“Like all organizations, we would like to grow, if possible,” he said.

If the demand on the Guard exceeds its capacity—for multiple natural disasters in quick succession, for instance— Hokanson said the states have a “compact” in which they can render manpower assistance to each other.

Some state Adjutants General have asked for increased manpower because of an unrelenting demand for Guard capabilities in their states, he said.

To help manage the demand, Hokanson said the TAGs “meet every year to discuss what forces could come and meet their requirements.” Usually, this focuses on hurricane relief, but he said this year, for the first time, the discussion included planning for a busy wildfire season, as well.

Until the Guard gets more people, “we’ll keep using the compacts,” he said.

The meetings are one way he said the Guard has “gotten a lot better at how we do this.” The TAGs identify shortages they expect to have in their states and the organization overall figures out how to train and prepare the people required.

Despite the demand, Hokanson said the Guard is doing well with recruiting and retention.

“Usually, we would meet our recruiting goal in … late September,” the end of the fiscal year, he said. But this year, the Army met its Guard recruiting goal in May, which was “historically early.”

Asked about plans for a Space National Guard, Hokanson said that while it’s not well known, “the Guard has been conducting space missions for over 25 years” and has more than 1,000 space professionals in its ranks.

“We really look forward to them transitioning from the Air National Guard to, hopefully, a Space National Guard in the future,” he said.

Many are already working in civilian industry, and their experience in both the military and their civilian jobs is a “win-win” for both organizations. Space Guard units would likely be set up in areas near where the civilian space industry is active, he said, to make service more attractive and increase the cross-pollination of knowledge.