Uzbekistan a Candidate for U.S. ‘Over-the-Horizon’ Support to Afghanistan

Uzbekistan a Candidate for U.S. ‘Over-the-Horizon’ Support to Afghanistan

With Afghan provincial capitals falling like dominoes in recent days, the Pentagon is still resisting pressure to promise air support to Afghanistan after the Aug. 31 withdrawal deadline. Countries in the region, however, may be key to providing the over-the-horizon support needed to turn the tide for the Afghan government.

Uzbekistan, where former Soviet bases were used for the initial U.S. invasion in 2001 and thereafter, is one of the countries where basing negotiations are ongoing, an Uzbek government official told Air Force Magazine on Aug. 12.

The Central Asian country of 33 million has benefited in recent years from U.S. professional military education and joint training exercises, DOD and Uzbek officials told Air Force Magazine. Uzbek officials said this was discussed at a July 1 Pentagon meeting between Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III and Uzbek Foreign Minister Abdulaziz Kamilov.

“Uzbekistan has been partnered with the Mississippi National Guard through the National Guard Bureau’s State Partnership Program since 2012,” Defense Department spokesperson Eric Pahon told Air Force Magazine.

In April 2021, the Mississippi National Guard hosted the annual international joint training exercise Southern Strike with the participation of Uzbek airmen.

“Several Uzbekistani soldiers also participated in the Mississippi National Guard’s ‘Best Warrior’ competition, which occurred during Southern Strike, and won top honors,” Pahon said.

An Uzbek government official told Air Force Magazine the country is interested in more professional military education and training opportunities to strengthen its military but is restrained by a constitutional prohibition on foreign military bases.

The official could not say whether that prohibition extended to prevent the U.S. Air Force from using landing strips on Uzbek bases for over-the-horizon support to Afghanistan.

An Uzbek military official who spoke to Air Force Magazine on Aug. 12 on the condition of anonymity said his government had responded to some of the questions from the American government and that negotiation was ongoing.

The official declined to comment on the possibility of a basing agreement in the wake of a deteriorating situation in Afghanistan.

U.S. special operations forces operated out of Uzbekistan’s Karshi-Khanabad, or K2, Air Base in the southeast of the country from 2001 to 2005. The base is now the home of the Uzbek Air Force’s 60th Separate Mixed Aviation Brigade.

An Afghan war veteran who served with the U.S. Air Force at the base told Air Force Magazine recently that he heard K2 was again a possibility, but he wondered whether “Russia would allow that.”

DOD said it supports the Russian-speaking country’s independence and partners on security cooperation-related issues bilaterally and through multilateral forum, including NATO.

“United States and Uzbekistan have a robust military-to-military relationship that includes cooperation on the modernization and professionalization of Uzbekistan’s military,” Pahon said, while declining to confirm “possible bilateral discussions.”

U.S. Sending 3,000 Troops to Protect American Diplomats in Kabul

U.S. Sending 3,000 Troops to Protect American Diplomats in Kabul

The Pentagon on Aug. 12 detailed a massive plan to protect American diplomats and Afghan special immigrant visa applicants in Kabul, ordering 3,000 Marines and Soldiers to Kabul within days, with an additional 1,000 Soldiers and Airmen deploying to Qatar to facilitate visa processing and an Army Brigade Combat Team of up to 4,000 Soldiers on standby in Kuwait should security in Afghanistan further deteriorate.

An airlift surge will take the troops to Kabul, and the Pentagon expects gray-tail mobility aircraft will be needed to ferry out U.S. diplomats and a large increase in translators and other Afghans seeking visas to leave the country.

Ten Afghan provincial capitals have fallen to the Taliban in recent days, and American airpower aimed at protecting large cities such as Kandahar and Herat is not enough for Afghan forces to prevent their likely fall.

Defense Department spokesman John F. Kirby said three infantry battalions will go to Kabul, two from the Marine Corps and one from the Army, joining some 650 American troops already on the ground. Kirby did not identify the units that will deploy, just that they are already in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility and able to quickly head to Afghanistan.

The units will be based at the Hamid Karzai International Airport to provide additional security and help bring out diplomats from the embassy, which is located a couple miles from the airport. The airport already hosts a small U.S. rotorcraft aviation presence, typically for transporting American and coalition personnel between locations.

The new deployments will raise the number of U.S. military personnel on the ground in Afghanistan to at least 3,650, more than the number deployed at the time President Joe Biden announced the withdrawal in April. Kirby said the mission will be short and “narrow in focus.”

Separately, the joint Army/Air Force group of 1,000 will go to Qatar to help the processing of Afghan special immigrant visas for interpreters and others who worked with coalition forces and would likely be targets of the Taliban. This team includes personnel such as medical specialists, engineers, security forces, and others.

Lastly, an 82nd Airborne brigade from Fort Bragg, N.C., will deploy to Kuwait and remain on standby. Kirby did not outline the exact process for this deployment. USAF C-17s work directly with the 82nd to facilitate quick deployment when needed, such as the early-2020 deployment to Kuwait amid rising tensions with Iran.

The number of backlogged visa applicants has been previously reported as in the tens of thousands.

“This is a temporary mission with a narrow focus,” Kirby said. “We certainly anticipate being postured to support airlift as well, for not only the reduction of civilian personnel from the embassy, but also in the forward movement of special immigrant visa applicants.”

Kirby said authorities for use of self-defense airpower remain in effect until the Aug. 31 withdrawal deadline for U.S. troops. The spokesperson did not indicate that the U.S. Air Force would be used to bolster Afghan forces as it has in recent days, and he would not speculate about force presence or mission after the imminent deadline. He did say he does not expect the airport in Kabul to host U.S. close air support assets and that the over-the-horizon operations would continue.

Kirby said Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III spoke to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani earlier in the day to discuss the decisions. Austin also consulted with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and U.S. Transportation Command in preparation for providing additional airlift to aid with the evacuation of civilian personnel.

Questioned about the manpower deploying for the unnamed mission, Kirby said the movement of military personnel was deemed “the prudent thing to do given the rapidly deteriorating security situation in and around Kabul.”

It is unclear how many American diplomats will be evacuated from the country and how many will remain at work from the Kabul airport.

“There is still a diplomatic presence in Kabul, and the intention is to maintain a diplomatic presence in Kabul,” Kirby said.

State Department spokesman Ned Price, during an Aug. 12 press conference, said the security situation has deteriorated to the point where Biden approved the downsizing of the embassy to protect Americans. The U.S. is “gravely concerned by the developments” across Afghanistan, and “given the situation on the ground,” the drawdown is a “prudent step.”

“This is not a full evacuation,” Price said, but he did not specify how many American diplomats would remain in Kabul.

Future Support for Afghan Government Unclear

The Embassy of Afghanistan in Washington, D.C., referred Air Force Magazine to the Pentagon regarding the question of air support after the Aug. 31 deadline.

“We don’t have [a] good picture,” an Afghan government official in Washington, D.C., told Air Force Magazine on Aug. 12, when asked the nature of the Taliban advance and the role of American air support.

Thus far, the Taliban has ignored international commitments to negotiate a peace settlement with the government of Afghanistan, choosing instead to make battlefield advances and commit human rights atrocities against soldiers and civilians, according to the United Nations.

In recent weeks, Afghanistan has received Blackhawk helicopters to provide close air support for its soldiers on the ground, part of a promise to give the Afghan air force 37 UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters and three additional A-29 Super Tucano light attack aircraft, and also to help refurbish its fleet of Mi-17 Soviet-era helicopters.

The U.S. Air Force has also bolstered the Afghan military fight against the Taliban with airstrikes, including from B-52s launched from Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar. Kirby said earlier in the week that no airstrikes have originated from Kabul, the last remaining American military presence in the country.

Kirby said Aug. 12 it is evident that the Taliban is not interested in peace negotiations.

“The Taliban continues to act as if they believe the only path to governance is through violence and brutality and oppression and force, contrary to what they have said previously at the negotiating table,” he said. “We would provide support to the Afghan national security defense forces where and when feasible, with the expectation and the knowledge that is not always going to be feasible.”

New Force Generation Model Will Differ for Air and Space Forces

New Force Generation Model Will Differ for Air and Space Forces

A new force generation model meant to balance rest with readiness will mean different things for the Air Force and the Space Force, leaders said at an Air Force Association Air and Space Warfighters in Action event Aug. 11.

The new model, described by Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. in an exclusive interview with Air Force Magazine on Aug. 4, aims at better balancing the strains put on Airmen and equipment after two decades of war and constant deployments.

“The force generation model is how any service trains and then presents forces for the Joint Staff, for the nation, to then use in war,” said Lt. Gen. Joseph T. Guastella Jr., the Air Force’s deputy chief of staff for operations.

Twenty years of counterinsurgency wars have taken a toll on the Air Force, he said.

“We’ve given everything we have to the fight,” Guastella said. “What that has done is exhausted the force. It’s exhausted a lot of the Airmen. It’s exhausted a lot of weapon systems—put thousands and thousands of hours on airplanes that we didn’t predict—and it’s driven us into a situation where we have an aging fleet.”

In the model, a 24-month cycle consists of four, six-month phases: Available to Commit, Reset, Prepare, and Ready. In the Reset phase, post-deployment Airmen get downtime to reconnect with their families and refresh basic skills then to work on advanced skills and training.

The new model is not only about giving Airmen and equipment more rest, it also addresses the 2018 National Defense Strategy’s call to be ready to face a peer adversary.

As part of the model, Airmen will train for the higher threat level posed by peer competitors such as China by taking part in high-end exercises including Red Flags, other large-force employment events, and Weapons School Integration.

“It also creates some predictability to life,” said Guastella, who formerly commanded Air Forces Central Command.

The result will be a force “more capable, and more prepared, to deter and defend our nation’s interest globally than we’ve ever had in the past,” he said.

Space Force Lt. Gen. B. Chance Saltzman, deputy Chief of Space Operations for operations, cyber, and nuclear, said that unlike the Air Force, Space Force operators deploy in place and their missions have no downtime.

“GPS doesn’t go away for us to train. We don’t redeploy GPS,” Saltzman said. “Missile warning—we don’t redeploy and reconstitute missile warning. And so, our forces are continuously asked to conduct that ‘protect and defend’ and that joint warfighting mission set 24/7/365.”

Meanwhile, those Guardians must still be ready should an adversary attempt to deny those capabilities. That requires advanced training. The new rotational model pulls some operators off the mission temporarily to receive higher-level training.

In an Aug. 6 National Press Club appearance, Brown outlined to Air Force Magazine the challenges of creating the new model.

“Whatever was needed, we would send, and what we were doing was we were running ourselves ragged,” Brown said of the constant calls for Air Force support in recent years. “What happens is that impacts our readiness and our future modernization.”

Brown said the new model will create unpredictability for the enemy and predictability for Airmen.

“It drives a bit more discipline,” he added. “Not only for us as United States Air Force but as we work with the Joint Staff and the combatant commands about how we deploy forces so we don’t burn everything up and then wish we had it ready to go if there was some type of crisis.”

Brown said the program is already beginning in some units but will fully roll out during fiscal year 2023.

During the AFA discussion, Saltzman credited the Guardian version of the new force generation model to his insistence on a Pentagon office near his Air Force counterpart.

“As you can imagine, the biggest fight the Space Force took on early on was floor space in the Pentagon,” he said to a laugh from the AFA audience.

“As the office debate started to occur, skiff battles started to occur, I said, ‘I want my office right next to [Guastella’s] A3 office,’ ” he said. “So, the S3, the Chief Operations Officer office, is right next to the A3 office. We do a lot of business between his office and the bathroom as we pass in the hallways, quite frankly. And that’s powerful. I think that keeps us synchronized, and that’s important.”

Senate Confirms New SOUTHCOM Boss, DOD Personnel Leader

Senate Confirms New SOUTHCOM Boss, DOD Personnel Leader

The Senate on Aug. 11 confirmed a new leader for U.S. Southern Command and a new undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness. The pace of confirmations ticked up with the approach of Congress’ August recess.

The Senate confirmed Army Lt. Gen. Laura Richardson, commander of United States Army North, to receive her fourth star and to lead SOUTHCOM. Richardson will be the second woman to lead a combatant command, following retired Air Force Gen. Lori J. Robinson, who commanded U.S. Northern Command before retiring in 2018.

President Joe Biden nominated Richardson for the job in March while also nominating USAF Gen. Jacqueline D. Van Ovost, current Air Mobility Command boss, to lead U.S. Transportation Command. That nomination is still pending without a confirmation hearing date set.

The Senate also confirmed former Rep. Gil Cisneros to lead DOD personnel and readiness. Cisneros, who was a Democratic representative for California’s 39th district until early this year, is a Navy veteran who served as a supply officer for 11 years.

Earlier in the week, the Senate also made additional confirmations, including:

  • Mara E. Karlin to serve as assistant secretary of defense for strategy, plans, and capabilities. Karlin formerly served as acting assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs.
  • USAF Maj. Gen. Ricky N. Rupp to receive his third star and to command U.S. Forces Japan and Fifth Air Force. Rupp currently commands the Air Force District of Washington.
  • USAF Maj. Gen. Russell L. Mack to receive his third star and to serve as deputy commander of Air Combat Command. Mack currently serves as the assistant deputy chief of staff, operations, in the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations.
  • Carlos Del Toro to be the next Secretary of the Navy.
New Skunk Works Plant to Build Advanced Fighters, Other Projects

New Skunk Works Plant to Build Advanced Fighters, Other Projects

PALMDALE, Calif.—Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works advanced development division opened a new 215,000-square-foot production facility Aug. 10, allowing reporters and visitors a glimpse inside the state-of-the-art factory before it begins production of classified systems and is likely permanently closed to non-cleared personnel.

What will be built here first is a secret, but Skunk Works Vice President and General Manager Jeff Babione said he anticipates the facility—at the Air Force’s sprawling Plant 42 complex—will build fighters; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft; hypersonic missiles; and other advanced projects, with possibly more than one project in series production at a time. He declined to say specifically whether Lockheed Martin will build Next-Generation Air Dominance fighters at the plant.

“This is a one-of-a-kind facility,” Babione told reporters in a press conference. One of four new factories to be opened by Lockheed Martin nationwide this year, it is an “intelligent, flexible” facility where there are “no permanent structures…there’s nothing drilled into the floor,” he said, allowing the plant to be reconfigured at will for efficient, flexible manufacturing. This flips the concept of most factories—such that for Lockheed Martin’s F-35 fighter in Fort Worth, Texas—designed specifically to produce a particular product.

“We have flexibility about where to put what you’re building within this massive floorplan,” he said. “Rather than the work coming to the robot, the robot will go to the work.” Robots will be able to perform one operation “on one end of the factory in the morning, and a completely different operation at the other end in the afternoon. So you’re going to see a significant increase in automation.”

The robots are commercial machines that Lockheed Martin will program. The software to make them do an operation “does not have to be resident” in the system, Babione said. This reduces cost because the same equipment is not dedicated solely to a particular function or program but has application to many projects.

One 27,000-pound robot on display in the new space can move on casters or on cushions of air for fine adjustment of positioning.

The robots “will talk to each other,” Babione added. “How are we doing with cutter speed? Cutter sharpness … do we need to change things? How is the quality of the holes [being drilled]?” Other innovations include advanced test capabilities for wire bundles and laser systems that can spot out-of-tolerance part thicknesses to the thousandths of an inch.

“This will be the first factory at the highest level of classification but has Wi-Fi inside,” to enable the speed of information and allow the “men and women working in that environment” to know the status of the equipment and processes at all times, he said.

The new plant will likely focus on final assembly, with parts produced at other areas of the campus and by vendors. Lockheed Martin is creating partnerships with a number of suppliers such as Spirit Aerosystems to digitally design and manufacture parts with very high precision.

“There will be no paper, only iPad-like devices,” Babione noted. The workers will have access to augmented reality systems to troubleshoot and determine the best ways for robots to execute the work in addition to developing better designs.

The cavernous plant is environmentally controlled to stay within 2.5 degrees of a set temperature in order to minimize changes of the materials in response to heat or humidity, so that joints line up as they were designed to do using digital thread methods.

“The components that make up the different vehicles that we are manufacturing have different coefficients of expansion,” Babione explained. “Composites are different than steel; steel is different than titanium; titanium is different from aluminum.” It’s important that they be assembled “at the same temperatures” at which they were manufactured, he said. “That’s how we eliminate the need to do drilling in that facility.”

The massive air conditioning system will be powered by a new solar farm adjacent to the plant with 52,000 solar panels. Lockheed Martin is working with the state and county to get the permits.

While Babione could not give an estimate as to how much the speed of work will increase versus traditional factories, he characterized it as “significant reductions … not only in design, but certainly development,” amounting to “almost a step function change” in time to complete work.

“That’s what our customer was asking for … how do we go from concept to capability much faster. The technology allows us to dramatically accelerate that life cycle,” he said.

Small batches of products can be made more efficiently in the plant.

“Not only did we not design it for anything in particular, we can design and build multiple assets within the same footprint, something that we really can’t do very well in our current arrangement,” so, “we can now bring [the values of] capacity/quantity to multiple programs” that may not be built in large numbers. “We absolutely see a future where this facility is building multiple types of platforms.” He mentioned large-scale production of hypersonic missiles as one possibility.

The new plant will also require 450 new employees at Skunk Works in Palmdale, adding to the unit’s rapid growth. Babione said advanced development has trebled its workforce—resident in Palmdale, Fort Worth, and Marietta, Ga.—since 2017, to about 5,600 employees. Those employees are heavily oriented toward engineering and administrative support, Babione said. But “the mix is changing … growing significantly in the manufacturing and labor area because we’re expanding this facility.” He also said “we are opening up a new classified facility in Marietta, as well, so I do see a significant shift … as we transition to these core manufacturing capabilities.”

Why Marietta? “We’re running out of space,” Babione said. While this pushed the production of the new plant, which has a height of about 80 feet, there is “significant unused space in Marietta. This is a great opportunity to take advantage of that as well as add capability. We don’t have any classified manufacturing space in Marietta.”

The huge investment—Babione referred to $400 million pumped into the local economy—suggests a business case for large-scale production at the site rather than the low-rate, small-volume Skunk Works production programs of the past, such as the F-117, SR-71, and U-2.

“What has changed is that the cost of technology has come way down,” Babione said. “Think about what a robot cost 20 years ago; very few people had a robot because of the massive cost … it had to have this tremendous business case.”

At the same time, customer expectations have changed, and “we have got to compress this timeframe” from concept to production, Babione said. “And that comes with a significant drop in the cost of products and services.” The new factory is not a matter of “should we do it … but, we have to do it, to meet the objectives of our customer, both from a cost and schedule standpoint” he said, adding, “things that work for our customer ultimately work for us.”

The increased production volume will also help Lockheed Martin recruit and retain workers for future advanced projects, which is “what we live for,” he said. Designing and prototyping advanced systems is “still the hallmark of what we do at Skunk Works. … It’s X-planes, advancing the state of the art, doing things that no one’s ever done before, that is at the core of what we do here.”

Air Force Global Strike Command Successfully Test Launches ICBM

Air Force Global Strike Command Successfully Test Launches ICBM

Air Force Global Strike Command launched an unarmed intercontinental ballistic missile from Vandenberg Space Force Base, Calif., in the early morning hours of Aug. 11, sending the ICBM some 4,200 miles before detonating it with non-nuclear explosives near the Marshall Islands in the Pacific.

Airmen from the 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont.; 90th Missile Wing at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo.; and 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air Force Base, N.D.; all contributed to the successful launch, which involved a Minuteman III missile and a Hi Fidelity Joint Test Assembly re-entry vehicle that detonated conventional explosives above the surface of the water near Kwajalein Atoll.

“The U.S. nuclear enterprise is the cornerstone of the security structure of the free world,” Col. Omar Colbert, 576th Flight Test Squadron commander, said in a statement. “Today’s test launch is just one example of how our nation’s ICBM fleet demonstrates operational readiness and reliability of the weapon system. It also allows us to showcase the amazing level of competence and capability of our Airmen.”

The test launch was not in response to “global events or regional tensions,” Lt. Col. Aaron Boudreau, Task Force commander, said in a statement. Launch calendars are made five years in advance, with planning for each particular launch taking six months to a year, he said.

Still, the test in the Pacific comes at a time when Air Force and Defense Department leadership have increasingly emphasized the threat posed by competition with China, especially in the Indo-Pacific region.

Within the past few weeks, search groups studying satellite imagery of a desert in western China have spotted more than 100 new silos for ICBMs, news outlets have reported, as the Chinese seemingly bolster their nuclear arsenal.

In response, Air Force leaders have emphasized the need for the U.S. to modernize its own nuclear missiles.

“I believe modernization is a critical part of that, right? Modernization is a critical part of counter-proliferation,” 20th Air Force Commander Maj. Gen. Michael J. Lutton said during a virtual Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies event Aug. 10. “And modernization is a critical part of nuclear nonproliferation. It is beneficial to work with the Chinese. We’ll see if the Chinese want to work with us.”

Minuteman III missiles, like the one used in the Aug. 11 test, were first deployed in 1970 and are expected to remain in use into the 2030s, with Air Force leaders saying they are committed to ensuring the aging system remains an effective deterrent while simultaneously advocating for its replacement, the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent. 

GBSD, however, has faced some criticism in Congress over its cost, and President Joe Biden’s administration is conducting a Nuclear Posture Review that will outline its view of the future of America’s nuclear triad.

20th Air Force Commander: Nuclear Modernization is Path to a Treaty with China

20th Air Force Commander: Nuclear Modernization is Path to a Treaty with China

A visit to China as a one-star solidified 20th Air Force Commander Maj. Gen. Michael J. Lutton’s belief that waiting to modernize America’s nuclear arsenal won’t work.

That’s because, in his view, the Chinese see treaties as a sign of weakness.

“I think the challenge is going to be on the Chinese side,” Lutton said during a virtual Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies event Aug. 10. “I’ll go back to that visit that I had. I was pretty amazed when we had a dialogue … where they talked about treaties.”

Lutton was part of a 2017 conversation with Chinese military academics, representatives from what he said is Beijing’s equivalent of the National War College.

“They wanted to know why the U.S. has so many treaties in the Indo-Pacific area of responsibility,” said Lutton, who oversees the Air Force’s intercontinental ballistic missiles.

The dialogue between the American military officers and Chinese academics continued, but the two sides remained an ocean apart.

“What they were still confounded by was why the United States would have a treaty because at least in these officers’ minds, treaties were an indication of weakness,” Lutton said. “Great nations don’t have treaties.”

China is not bound by strategic arms limitations treaties such New START between the United States and Russia, which was renewed for another five years in February. That treaty allows the two parties to verify each other’s nuclear reserves.

“The interesting thing on China that I find is the near complete lack of transparency,” Lutton said, describing a “very complex decision-making process” for the Chinese national security apparatus.

Lutton’s comments come on the heels of the publication of satellite data that reveals that China has constructed more than 100 new ICBM silos in deserts in the western part of its territory.

The Biden Administration is also undertaking a new Nuclear Posture Review that will outline its view of the future of America’s nuclear triad and whether 50-year-old Minuteman III ICBMs will be replaced by the new Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent over the next 10 years with a price tag of some $95 billion.

Lutton and other nuclear commanders, including U.S. Strategic Command’s Adm. Charles “Chas” A. Richard, have said there is no more time to delay and that life extensions will cost more than a new system.

Some liberal members of Congress, including House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) continue to question the need to modernize all three components of the triad or maintain the current level of missiles. In the past, Smith has argued that China has a much smaller number and that Russia is limited by treaty.

Smith made his case again in an Aug. 9 letter to President Joe Biden.

“While the cost of our nuclear modernization program has long concerned me, I have been equally concerned with the previous Administration’s complete lack of serious engagement with potential nuclear armed adversaries to pursue arms control and reduce nuclear proliferation,” Smith wrote.

Smith called on Biden to open a dialogue with China on its nuclear forces, doctrine, and intentions.

In his list of recommendations, Smith also called on the president to review the size and necessity of the land-based leg of the triad and to “independently validate the Air Force’s cost estimates” for GBSD.

Lutton agrees that the U.S. should try to negotiate with China, but he feels America will be in a stronger negotiating position with a modernized nuclear force.

“We should still try and work with the Chinese,” he said.

“I believe modernization is a critical part of that, right? Modernization is a critical part of counter-proliferation. And modernization is a critical part of nuclear nonproliferation,” he added. “It is beneficial to work with the Chinese. We’ll see if the Chinese want to work with us.”

Ahead of COVID-19 Vaccine Order, Two-Thirds of Airmen and Guardians Already Have Taken It

Ahead of COVID-19 Vaccine Order, Two-Thirds of Airmen and Guardians Already Have Taken It

In the next month or so, the COVID-19 vaccine will become mandatory for all Active-duty service members following Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III’s announcement Aug. 9 that he will ask President Joe Biden for a waiver to require the shot by Sept. 15.

For at least two-thirds of Airmen and Guardians, though, the requirement will be a moot point as they have already received the vaccine, according to updated Department of the Air Force data released Aug. 10.

All told, 66.4 percent of Active-duty personnel in the department are now at least partially vaccinated—61.9 percent of those fully. That represents roughly a five percentage point gain from the end of June, when the combined Air and Space Forces’ vaccination rate of 61 percent was ahead of the Marine Corps but behind the Army and Navy.

The most recent numbers still leave more than 33 percent of the force who have not received the shot, despite it being widely available to the military for several months. That percentage translates to more than 100,000 Airmen and Guardians.

The proportion of unvaccinated individuals grows when the Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard are included with the Active duty—61.8 percent are at least partially vaccinated, 38.2 percent are not vaccinated at all.

“If we want to get out of this and really get this behind us, people have to get vaccinated,” newly installed Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall told Air Force Magazine in an Aug. 6 interview. “And so, the one thing I would say is to urge our Airmen, our Guardians, their families, and the people that they know, associate with, their loved ones, to get vaccinated.”

“I’ve heard from a lot of our Airmen the last couple of weeks about the COVID-19 vaccine,” Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass said in a Facebook post. “And I know there is some apprehension within the force. I agree with Secretary Austin” in urging service members to get vaccinated before mid-September arrives.

Austin was not originally expected to make the vaccine mandatory until at least one of the shots received full Food and Drug Administration approval—at the moment, three of the vaccines have received emergency use approval by the FDA.

But growing concern over rising case numbers and the spread of the “delta” variant have intensified calls for the military to add the COVID shot to its list of required vaccines for Active-duty members. According to The New York Times, the FDA is aiming to approve one vaccine, made by Pfizer and BioNTech, by early September.

Like the rest of the country, the Department of the Air Force has seen a jump in cases of the novel coronavirus. Each week for the last six weeks, the number of new cases has increased, and on Aug. 10, the department reported 865 new cases, the largest one-week increase since February.

Kendall: Current F-35 Block 4 Issues Reminiscent of Earlier JSF Problems

Kendall: Current F-35 Block 4 Issues Reminiscent of Earlier JSF Problems

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and new Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall have a history, and some parts of it look to be repeating themselves.

Kendall, now in his third week leading the Department of the Air Force, oversaw DOD weapons buying as the undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology, and logistics from 2012 to 2016. For the two years before that, he served as principal deputy undersecretary and acting undersecretary in the same office.

In those earlier years, the F-35 was not developing to plan. Serious design problems required expensive retrofits.

The issues came to a head in contractual discussions over Lot 4 of the low-rate initial production phase of the aircraft. Agreements in place since 2010, with the expected retrofits, were not what the Defense Department needed.

“We’re in a situation that bears some resemblance to one that I had earlier on, around Lot 4 or so, when there were a lot of design issues on a plane that hadn’t been resolved, and we were in the process of buying airplanes that were going to need extensive modifications,” Kendall told Air Force Magazine in an exclusive interview. “At that point, I seriously considered stopping production for two or three years to get those design issues resolved. …

“I decided not to do that.”

He instead decided to cap the production rate at 30 for two years “in part” to put pressure on the builder, Lockheed Martin, “but also to avoid buying airplanes that we were going to do expensive modifications on after we bought them.

“That worked out.”

Now, Kendall said, the Pentagon seems to be in a similar situation: The Air Force should be buying the F-35 that it needs—specifically the Block 4 upgrade with Technology Refresh 3, “which is having problems,” Kendall said.

TR3 includes a new core processor, a radar upgrade, and a new cockpit display, along with software updates to enhance electronic warfare capabilities. This refresh would “unlock” the jet’s Block 4 improvements. Because the Block 4 version is what the Air Force wants, negotiations have focused on fewer aircraft over the upcoming production lots. The F-35 Joint Program Office has said the TR3 upgrade will come in Lot 15, set for 2023, “as required.”

In the meantime, the Air Force is slowing its F-35 buys, calling for 48 in fiscal 2022 then 43 per year from fiscal 2023 to fiscal 2026, a 10 percent drop from its previous future years defense plan.

Skeptics question the timeline for Block 4 upgrades. The Government Accountability Office, in a March report, said the JPO’s schedule for the modernization effort was “not realistic,” with the Pentagon regularly underestimating how much work is needed to develop the upgrades.

“I think that we need to look, at this point, [at] what the appropriate production rate is to get us from where we are to when we have that capability on hand,” Kendall said. “And the contractor has not been performing very well—there have been a lot of problems with that.”

Like the Lot 4 negotiations, Kendall said he hopes slowing the buy will apply some pressure and get the upgrades as needed.

“It’s critically important to the success of that program and the capability of that platform that we get the Technology Refresh 3 fielded into it, get the Block 4 upgrade fielded,” Kendall said. His acquisition philosophy: to get “meaningful military capability in the hands of operators. That’s what it’s all about. And we need to get to Block 4.”

The Air Force faces extremely high operating and sustainment costs for the F-35, another issue that could affect the long-term health of the fleet. While Kendall, just in his third week, said he had not had a chance to look “into it in detail,” he did recently discuss the issue with the Joint Program Office.

“They do feel that they have some ways to reduce costs significantly that they’re still exploring. So, that’s encouraging.”

The F-35 still is a “dramatically improved capability” over fourth-generation aircraft, Kendall said. The jet represents a “game-changing tactical air warfare capability. And it is expensive, compared to much earlier systems, which are much simpler and less capable.”

As the fleet expands, the Air Force and other stakeholders need to drive the costs down, he said. Some “real opportunities” include replacing the much-maligned Autonomic Logistics Information System with the Operational Data Integrated Network.

“We can hopefully reduce some manpower through that. We can reduce the cycle times for maintenance and get some savings there as well,” Kendall said.

He added: “There are also some technologies that could go into future upgrades that could reduce some of the operational costs, such as fuel, significantly, but we’re not ready to commit to those at this point.” He nodded when asked if he was referring to a “next-generation engine.”