Air Force is 120 Airplanes Smaller Since 2020, But Fighters and Bombers Stay About Level

Nov. 24, 2021 | By John A. Tirpak

The Air Force trimmed 120 airplanes from its fleet in fiscal 2021, gaining the most aircraft among its F-35 fighter squadrons and giving up the most from its B-1 bomber units, according to data provided by the Air Force. With puts and takes, the Air Force’s kinetic shooter fleet, not including special operations, stayed about the same, at 2,301 aircraft.

The F-35 fleet gained 61 aircraft in 2021, with the most—33 airplanes—filling out squadrons at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, in Pacific Air Forces, which now has 43 jets. Another 13 bolstered Air Education and Training Command’s training squadrons, giving it 115 in total. Air Combat Command picked up six F-35s, for a total of 122, and the Air National Guard gained nine, for a total of 20. Air Force Materiel Command has two for test. The Air Force had 302 F-35s as of Sep. 30., the end of the fiscal year. The F-35 fleet is now second only to the F-16 fleet in size.

Global Strike Command gave up the 17 B-1B aircraft the Air Force asked Congress to let it retire last year, leaving it with a force of 45 of the bombers, which remain distributed between Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, and Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D. The other two bomber fleets—the B-2A and B-52H—remained at 20 and 76 airplanes, respectively. Eighteen B-52s are in the Air Force Reserve Command and two “belong” to Air Force Materiel Command, for testing, although former Air Force Global Strike Command chief Gen. Timothy M. Ray predicted as many as 12 may switch from AFGSC to AFMC to support testing of a variety of new weapons, particularly hypersonic missiles.

The F-22 fleet remained static at 185 aircraft, but eight airplanes apparently transferred from Air Combat Command to Pacific Air Forces.

While ACC gained two brand-new F-15EX aircraft, U.S. Air Forces in Europe and the Air National Guard each gave up an F-15C. Air Combat Command has just 23 F-15C/Ds, while the ANG has 136, PACAF owns 53 and USAFE 20, with AFMC having five for test, for a total of 237 F-15C/D.

The F-15E fleet of 218 aircraft are mostly in ACC, with 158; while USAFE has 55 and AFMC has five for test.

The F-16C/D fleet of 937 aircraft—down just one from 2020—is mostly in the Air National Guard, which has 332 of the jets. The next largest operator is ACC, with 168, followed by PACAF, with 135 and AETC, with 134. USAFE has 78 F-16C/D while AFMC, which uses them as chase planes as well as for test purposes, has 36.

The A-10C fleet, which the Air Force says it will not reduce further until around 2030, is at 281 aircraft; unchanged from 2020. The bulk of those, 115, are in ACC, while the ANG has 85, Air Force Reserve Command has 55, and PACAF has 24. The remaining two are with AFMC for test purposes.

The MQ-9 Reaper remotely piloted aircraft fleet increased by 33 airframes to 323. AETC gained 24 Reapers for training.

Air Combat Command gained one AT-6 light attack aircraft for development of tactics and partnership concepts with coalition nations.

No COVID-19 Vaccine, No PCS Moves, Air Force Says

Nov. 24, 2021 | By Greg Hadley

With several thousand Airmen still unvaccinated against COVID-19, the Air Force is reportedly introducing a new consequence for those without a medical or administrative exemption.

Starting Nov. 29, unvaccinated Airmen will be blocked from moving to new assignments unless they are on existing PCS orders, or have been selected for future PCS, according to a memo from Lt. Gen. Brian T. Kelly, deputy chief of staff for manpower, personnel, and services, that started circulating on Facebook and Reddit on Nov. 23.

The Air Force did not immediately respond to Air Force Magazine queries about the memo.

Airmen who have out-processed or shipped household goods before Nov. 29 will be allowed to complete their moves, the memo states, but others won’t be able to move until they are fully vaccinated or receive a medical exemption or religious accommodation.

Unvaccinated Airmen will receive an Assignment Availability Code preventing future assignment selection. For unvaccinated Airmen overseas, the code will extend the Date Eligible to Return from Overseas as needed.

The new mandatory policy is in effect for one year and does not apply to vaccinated Airmen or those with exemptions, the memo states.

It is unclear just how many Airmen the new policy will affect. According to the latest data released Nov. 24, there are now 7,874 Airmen and Guardians who are unvaccinated with no exemptions.

For the overwhelming majority of the force, however, it will have no effect—96.6 percent of the Active duty Air Force and Space Force is already fully vaccinated, another 0.5 percent is partially vaccinated, and more than 1,400 have approved exemptions.

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has heavily hinted that Airmen who continue to refuse the vaccine will eventually be booted from the service, saying that it’s a “pretty straightforward question” when asked about it in a recent Facebook town hall.

In the same town hall, Kendall also raised the possibility that unvaccinated Airmen would not be able to deploy.

Other services have already put policies in place aimed at forcing out vaccine refusers—the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps have all said they will not allow refusers to reenlist or be promoted. The Navy and the Marines have also detailed their timelines for starting the separation process if unvaccinated service members don’t receive an accommodation.

The Air Force, meanwhile, has yet to publicly detail how it will go about separating vaccine refusers or if it will block reenlistments and promotions. The action to prevent moves, however, comes as the department struggles to work its way through a huge backlog of religious exemption requests. Under Department of the Air Force policy, Airmen and Guardians are supposed to get a ruling on their requests within 30 business days, but as of Nov. 24, it still has 4,756 requests pending—when the vaccine deadline passed Nov. 3, it had 4,933. That slow pace could result in unvaccinated Airmen remaining in the service for weeks or months while they wait for a ruling.

SOUTHCOM Advances ‘Quiet Weapon System,’ Promoting Gender Equality in Regional Militaries

Nov. 24, 2021 | By Abraham Mahshie

U.S. SOUTHERN COMMAND, Miami, Fla.—Gen. Laura J. Richardson made history as the first woman to lead U.S. Southern Command and the third ever to lead a U.S. combatant command. Seeing a woman in such a senior leadership role is already having a powerful impact on female officers and enlisted personnel in regional militaries.

“Everywhere we went in Colombia, there were women lining up wanting to take pictures with her,” Lt. Col. Duilia Turner, gender officer and chief of SOUTHCOM’s Women’s Peace and Security (WPS) office, told Air Force Magazine on a recent visit to the Miami-based regional command for Latin America and the Caribbean.

“I think because she’s an aviator, when she saw another woman aviator … there was something there that they know what they went through, or they have been going through,” said Turner, who accompanied Richardson on her trip to Colombia Nov. 17-18. “There was the eyeball to eyeball connection that was really special to see.”

Over 70 women and men attended the event at the Tolemaida Air Base in the central Colombian Andes, home to American-made Blackhawk helicopters like those Richardson flew in Iraq and Afghanistan. Colombian leaders discussed opportunities for women in defense and security, training and education, and the development of the senior enlisted force.

“[Richardson] is interested in the force development, the development of the enlisted corps, junior officers,” said Turner. “As well as the idea that talent doesn’t have gender.”

SOUTHCOM’s Women’s Peace and Security office was established in 2020 under the civilian deputy to the commander, while other combatant commands host their WPS offices under directorates. As a priority program, SOUTHCOM’s office is the only one led by a military officer. WPS offices were set up in response to the 2017 Women, Peace, and Security Act signed by President Donald J. Trump that enshrined in law the U.S. commitment to UN Security Council resolution 1325.

Turner, who was born in New York to Colombian parents and raised in Brazil until the age of 19, is using her Air Force training and personal story to help advance Richardson’s progress on the initiative.

The gender officer explained that SOUTHCOM’s outreach related to UNSCR 1325 builds trust with partner militaries and helps the U.S. reinforce its commitment to shared democratic values.

“When we share those values of trust, democracy, equality under the law, we have this connection that can only help us to foster this in our region for stability,” Turner explained. “It’s a quiet weapon system, … and that’s a strategic advantage of women, peace, and security.”

Women comprise 32 percent of the Colombian Air Force compared to the U.S. Air Force at 21 percent. In Colombia, 11 percent of those female aviators are fixed and rotary wing pilots, a Colombian Air Force spokesperson told Air Force Magazine.

Across the region, SOUTHCOM’s WPS office has reached over 20 countries. During COVID, the command’s senior enlisted panels reached 40,000 viewers online and achieved 150,000 engagements.

The biggest challenge that remains, Turner said, is “mindset.”

“I am in the business of changing mindsets,” she said. “The mindset that thinks that women shouldn’t be in the military, that thinks that we’re inferior in any way, physically or mentally, that we don’t belong here, that this is not about combat capability.”

Turner uses education and data to show that women help fill strategic and operational “blind spots,” contributing to mission effectiveness by adding a valuable perspective.

“This is not making concessions for women so that, you know, we can lower the standard so women can hop in. The idea is to allow women who are capable to really flourish and make our force [better],” she said. “This is not wishful thinking, ‘Oh, let’s feel good about it.’ This is a fact.”

Turner saw that Richardson was moved by the impact she made at Tolemaida.

“Sometimes it takes someone on that level to make that inspirational impact to show, ‘Wow, you really can go super far,’” she said of the Colombian aviators and other female service members who were motivated by Richardson’s engagement and presence.

“I was not expecting that,” Turner added. “When I knew she was coming, I was very excited. But I think I’m pleasantly surprised with their reactions and what they can still do.”

New DOD Group to ‘Synchronize’ Efforts to Track Unidentified Aerial Phenomena

Nov. 24, 2021 | By Greg Hadley

The Defense Department is establishing a new office to coordinate its approach to unidentified aerial phenomena, signaling the Pentagon’s increasing interest in the issue as it becomes less and less of a fringe concern.

The Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group was announced by Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen H. Hicks in a Nov. 23 memo and will be organized underneath the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, Ronald Moultrie.

The AOIMSG’s purpose will be to “synchronize efforts across the department and with other federal departments and agencies to detect, identify, and attribute objects of interests” in Special Use Airspace such as DOD training ranges and installations, the memo states.

The group will serve as the successor to the Navy’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, which is in the process of transitioning to the AOIMSG, a Defense Department spokeswoman told Air Force Magazine.

The formation of the new office comes almost exactly five months after the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a highly anticipated report on UAP that was mandated by Congress. The report focused on 144 incidents of UAP identified by military pilots dating back to 2004 and was unable to provide explanations for all but one of them.

The majority of those incidents were reported by Navy aviators, and the report noted that the Air Force’s “data collection has been limited historically.” That was just one of the challenges the report identified in analyzing and reaching conclusions on UAP incidents.

The AOIMSG is aimed at addressing those challenges and potential solutions identified in the report, the spokeswoman said. As part of coordinating how departments detect, identify, and attribute UAP, the new group will standardize the reporting process across the Pentagon, the memo states. It will also collect and analyze operational and intelligence data and recommend policy and regulatory changes as necessary.

The group will be overseen by the Airborne Object Identification and Management Executive Council, which will be co-chaired by the undersecretary for intelligence and security and the director of operations for the Joint Staff. The The executive council will appoint an acting director for the group and submit implementation guidance—announcements regarding “organizational membership, roles, responsibilities, and authorities” will come in the weeks ahead, the spokeswoman said.

The new office would seem to fill some of the roles envisioned in an amendment offered to the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.). Gillibrand’s legislation calls for the establishment of a “Anomaly Surveillance and Resolution Office” in the Pentagon that would take on the duties of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, “synchronize and standardize the collection, reporting, and analysis” of UAP events, and evaluate their threat to national security.

Under Gillibrand’s amendment, the office would also be responsible for ensuring UAP incidents are reported to a “centralized repository,” as well as crafting a “science plan” to develop and test theories “to account for characteristics and performance of unidentified aerial phenomena that exceed the known state of the art in science or technology.” The amendment also calls for twice-yearly briefings to Congress panels.

Gillibrand is also proposing the formation of an “Aerial and Transmedium Phenomena Advisory Committee,” with appointed experts from NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Academies of Sciences, the head of the Galileo Project at Harvard University, the director of the Optical Technology Center at Montana State University, the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies, and the American Institute of Astronautics and Aeronautics.

The proposal has bipartisan backing, POLITICO reported, as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have cited the issue’s potential national security implications as reason to take it more seriously. While much of the public fascination on the subject has focused on the idea of extraterrestrial origins for the UAP, some analysts and lawmakers have raised the possibility of foreign powers using new technologies.

Gillibrand’s office has not responded to a request for comment from Air Force Magazine on the newly announced AOIMSG and how it relates to her amendment. One of the co-sponsors to Gillibrand’s amendment, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), issued a statement to Air Force Magazine.

“Sen. Rubio welcomes greater attention by the Defense Department on the issue of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon,” the statement reads. “It is important that the DOD and Intelligence Community work together to gather more data on UAPs, particularly those operating in and around military airspace as they may pose a threat to flight safety for military aviators and some have exhibited potentially advanced aviation characteristics or may be foreign intelligence collection platforms.”

Gillibrand isn’t the only lawmaker proposing a permanent office within the Pentagon to study UAP. Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz) included an amendment to the House’s version of the 2022 NDAA that would establish such an office and require an annual report to Congress.

KC-46 Weapons Systems Council Unifies Lessons Learned With USAF’s New Tanker

Nov. 24, 2021 | By Abraham Mahshie

Air Mobility Command’s KC-46 next generation refueler has been operating from five bases nationwide and for nearly two years, but lessons learned and problems encountered were not unified until a Nov. 17-18 Weapons Systems Council at McConnell Air Force Base, Kan.

“The KC-46, being a new platform, it did not have an established Weapons System Council, and so we were really lacking that as a community,” Col. Nate Vogel, commander of the 22nd Air Refueling Wing (ARW), told Air Force Magazine after the event and associated training exercises concluded.

“We’ve matured enough to where different organizations were getting to become experts in the weapon system,” he explained. “We wanted to make sure that as an enterprise, we stayed synchronized, understood the challenges that each other had and the opportunities that were out there, and then decided how best we could move this forward.”

The two-day event discussed problems and best practices, including approaches to agile combat employment (ACE) and aeromedical evacuation, areas that some bases have been practicing more than others. Participants also received a briefing on the KC-46’s cyber capabilities.

The Air Force currently has 50 KC-46 refuelers in its total force inventory and plans to procure 179 as it retires the KC-10 and a portion of its KC-135 flight. The remaining KC-135s will be upgraded until a bridge tanker comes online.

A total of 60 people participated in the weapons system council, including KC-46 wing commanders and senior enlisted leaders, operations group and squadron commanders, and operations experts from Guard, Reserve, and Active duty units. In attendance were representatives from McConnell’s 22nd ARW and 931st ARW, Air Mobility Command headquarters, Air Force Reserve Command headquarters, 4th Air Force, 60th Air Mobility Wing, 157th ARW, 97th AMW, 305th AMW, 916th ARW, 509th Weapons Squadron, and the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center.

Three KC-46s also flew aircrews from McConnell, Altus Air Force Base, Okla., and Pease Air National Guard Base, N.H., to refuel F-16s from the Oklahoma Air National Guard’s 138th Fighter Wing.

“It was a good opportunity for us all to come together and learn from each other,” said Vogel.

Since the first KC-46 was delivered to McConnell on Jan. 25, 2019, it has flown 5,000 real-world missions conducting 25,000 boom and 1,400 drogue contacts. Three recent interim capability releases enable U.S. Transportation Command to task out refueling missions for the F-15, F-16, B-52, C-17, and other KC-46 receivers. The F/A-18A-F and EA-18G can also be refueled through the platform’s centerline drogue system. The TRANSCOM missions do not include deployments and alerts.

“It’s kind of fascinating, honestly, to see across the Air Force who really doesn’t even understand that the 46 is getting after it,” said Lt. Col. Joshua Moores, commander of the 344th Air Refueling Squadron, reflecting on the number of missions the aircraft is already handling.

The weapons council had four core objectives:

Operationalize the KC-46
Drive a “world-class enterprise culture”
Establish a shared understanding of current and future problems
Generate momentum toward initial operational capability (IOC) and full operational capability (FOC).

“With a young airframe, it’s very important to get that culture correct,” said Moores. “It is important that the weapons system council wings are moving toward that, which we had a great opportunity to all discuss, and to synchronize on these issues.”

Bases nationwide have been problem solving the new weapon system for nearly two years, developing local expertise as well as confronting similar challenges.

“Everybody’s getting after it,” Moores said. “But there’s still areas to improve processes. So, local process improvement came out of that, and then at the end was just the ability for all of those Airmen to have an understanding that at any point in time, they can go out and be interoperable with all of the KC-46 enterprise.”

McConnell is now synthesizing feedback on the problem areas discussed and ways forward to share with the group.

“Then we no kidding sit down over the next two to three weeks after that, and really nugget out as far as, ‘What is the exact problem? What do we think is the way ahead? Who is the person that we think should own the problem? And when do we think that it should be fixed,” said Vogel.

“As long as we keep doing that and then we go out and we keep performing and improving on the enterprise, I think that the work will speak for itself,” he added. “It really is starting to take off from our end.”

AFRL Wants to Capture College Creativity in Maturing AI for Autonomous Systems

Nov. 24, 2021 | By Amanda Miller

An $88 million deal with the University of Dayton will hopefully “add a unique fresh look” at maturing artificial intelligence for Air Force autonomy applications.

The agreement between the Air Force Research Laboratory and the University of Dayton Research Institute—a program called Soaring Otter—expands on what Kelly Miller of the AFRL Sensors Directorate characterized as “existing research challenges.” Ranging from students to “extremely experienced technical experts,” Miller told Air Force Magazine by email that the university group’s “very diverse and capable teammates” factored into its selection.

“University partners are always a good way to get fresh ideas and re-energize the research, looking at different perspectives to solve a nagging problem,” Miller said.

Without naming any specific programs the research might benefit or offering any concrete expected outcomes, Miller said the researchers bring the “unique fresh look at complex problems” related to three of the five “transformational capabilities” the Air Force listed in its Science and Technology Strategy released in 2019:

Global persistent awareness, “which may include advances in ‘multimodal sensing’ and developing new laser and multistatic radars,” according to the Air Force
Resilient information sharing, “which may include developing mesh networks and ‘agile systems with real-time spectrum awareness’”
Rapid, effective decision-making, “which may include advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and predictive data analytics.”

Miller said Soaring Otter will involve “fundamental through advanced research areas” and “provide expertise in several areas including machine learning”—a branch of artificial intelligence—“to advance, evaluate, and mature Air Force autonomy capabilities.”

In its announcement of Soaring Otter, the university said technologies such as machine learning, artificial intelligence, and neural networks can help autonomous systems gather and process information and “then use the information to solve a problem or execute an action to achieve a goal.”

The name Soaring Otter symbolizes the program’s aim of “making major advancements, taking the technology to the next level, reaching the unexpected,” said Miller, who also acknowledged a personal interest in otters.

At the same time AFRL has brought in the University of Dayton to aggressively advance AI specifically for autonomy, the Department of the Air Force has taken up residence at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to help advise and do research as part of 10 AI research projects while exposing more people from around the Air Force and Space Force to AI.

Average Age of USAF Aircraft Drops Slightly, But Eight Fleets Now Exceed 50 Years Old

Nov. 23, 2021 | By John A. Tirpak

Purchases of new F-35 fighters, KC-46 tankers, and C-130 transports in recent years have made only a small dent in the age of the Air Force’s fleet, down to 29.1 years across all types after hitting 30.55 years in 2020. But the service operates eight fleets exceeding an average of 50 years, and one—the KC-135—now exceeds 60.

According to data supplied to Air Force Magazine, the AT-38/T-38 trainers, the B-52 bomber, and aircraft based on the C-135 series—the KC-135, NC-135, RC-135, TC-135, and WC-135—are all in their mid-to-late 50s, with the KC-135 ringing in at 60.35 years of age. The B-52 is not far behind the Stratotanker, with an average age of 59.8 years. The data were current as of Sep. 30, the end of fiscal 2021.

Altogether, the Air Force operates eight fleets more than 50 years old; 13 more than 40 years old; 22 fleets older than 30 years; and 31 fleets more than 20 years old, on average. The remainder average less than 20 years old.

The raw numbers don’t tell the whole story, however. For example, the E-8 Joint STARS fleet is listed as having an average age of 20.8 years, but that only dates the inventory to when the Air Force acquired it; the Joint STARS were built on ex-commercial 707s that had already seen long service but were reconditioned before being configured as E-8s. The C-5M fleet is based on C-5As built in the 1960s and ’70s and C-5Bs built in the 1980s, then modified to the Super Galaxy configuration with new engines and structural enhancements. That fleet is listed as 35.14 years old, on average.

The youngest fleets in service are the KC-46, at 1.48 years old; the HC-130, at 4.0 years old; and the F-35, at 4.34 years in average age across some 302 aircraft. The Air Force also has a single AT-6 at less than a year old and three aircraft listed as “P-9A”—possibly PC-9 trainers—at five years old. The average age of the MQ-9 Reaper fleet of remotely piloted aircraft is given as 6.05 years across a fleet of 323 airplanes. Although the Air Force has accepted at least one MH-139 VIP/missile field support helicopter for testing, it is not listed on USAF’s tables. The two F-15EX fighters delivered this year are listed as “0.5” years old.

Air Combat Command’s F-15Cs ring in at 37.69 years old, and the F-15E Strike Eagles are 30.99 years old, on average. When they were new, both fleets were initially expected to serve about 12-15 years.

The B-1B and B-2A bombers are now 34.05 years old and 27.29 years old, respectively. Although the service retired 17 B-1Bs in fiscal 2021, that didn’t affect the average age much because those drawn down were already among the youngest of the fleet, built over a four-year period in the 1980s. Similarly, the 20 B-2s were all built in the mid- to late 1990s. The B-52Hs will likely reach 100 years of service, as they will soon be equipped with new engines and radars and are planned to serve into the 2050s.

Other types targeted for replacement in the coming few years include the E-4B flying command post, now at 47.38 years average age, and the E-3 AWACS at 42.99 years; USAF leaders have spoken in recent months about replacing the AWACS with the E-7 Wedgetail now serving in Australia’s air force. Although the AT-38/T-38 fleet is nearing 60 years, the Air Force anticipates it will take until the early 2030s to replace them with the T-7A RedHawk, and the last T-38Cs, upgraded with new displays, wings, and other improvements, may reach 70 years of service.

“The excessive age of the Air Force aircraft inventory is the result of decades of neglect,” said retired Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, head of AFA’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.

“Recapitalization and modernization … was deferred due to choices” made by Pentagon leaders “in favor of near-term priorities,” resulting in the gradual aging of the inventory over three decades, he told Air Force Magazine.

For the last 27 years, the Department of the Air Force was given less funding than the Departments of the Army or Navy, Deptula noted.

“The situation is now chronic and must be addressed,” he said. An Air Force that’s “relevant to dealing with the threats facing the nation … [is] fundamental to any successful joint military operation.”

The Pentagon, he said, can “no longer ‘kick the can down the road.’ The Air Force must be resourced to modernize its force, or its fragility will limit our ability to execute the national defense strategy.”

Upgraded Missile Warning Satellites Come ‘Another Significant Step’ Closer to Reality

Nov. 23, 2021 | By Amanda Miller

The Space Force’s “go fast acquisition” of three new missile warning satellites passed a system-level critical design review Oct. 28 that judged how the satellites and associated ground systems will work together and how the new equipment will work with existing missile warning systems.

Lockheed Martin received the contract to design the Next Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared (OPIR) Geosynchronous Earth Orbit satellites, which it calls NGGs, in 2018 for $2.9 billion. They’re the first batch of modern satellites meant to improve on and eventually replace the current Space-Based Infrared satellites, also built by Lockheed Martin. The contract was modified to add $4.9 billion in January 2021 for production and storage of the satellites, engineering related to launch, an interim ground system, and early on-orbit checkout of the satellites.

The satellites themselves and the payloads for the first two had already passed critical design reviews, Lockheed Martin said in a news release Nov. 23. The system-level review represented “another significant step” toward the first launch, planned for 2025, the company said. The review “specifically addressed the integration between the space and ground segments in addition to the integration of the Next Generation Interim Operations Ground System” with legacy systems.

The satellites are designed with “improved warning” features to detect missiles that move faster or create a dimmer infrared signature than current systems are designed to track, according to the release. The satellites were designed within the framework of Lockheed Martin’s LM 2100 Combat Bus, which can weigh from 5,070 to 14,330 pounds, according to Lockheed Martin. The satellites will also feature “enhanced resiliency and cyber hardening,” according to the company.

Upgrading the U.S.’s missile warning systems matters now because other countries are “finding ways to make missile warning more difficult,” said Joseph Rickers, Lockheed Martin’s vice president and program manager for the three NGG satellites, designated as Block 0, in the release. “They are also posing threats to space assets themselves.”

The Russian government acknowledged testing an anti-satellite weapon Nov. 15 that not only showed it could destroy a satellite in low Earth orbit but also created an extensive new debris field that U.S. officials and other world governments said will place space missions at more risk for years to come.

NGG satellites will travel in geosynchronous Earth orbit, farther than the Russian anti-satellite weapon system is suspected of being able to reach.

The Next-Gen OPIR isn’t the only effort attempting to field new missile-warning satellites. The Space Development Agency is planning a “Tracking Layer” as part of its National Defense Space Architecture of smallsats.

Eight wide-field-of-view infrared satellites are planned as part of a 28-satellite constellation in low Earth orbit that the SDA pegged for launch in 2022. The 28 are expected to form “the initial kernel” of the architecture that could ultimately number close to 200, with 40 to detect missiles. L3 Harris and SpaceX received $193 million and $149 million respectively to each build four of the infrared satellites. A test of an infrared sensor launched in August.

Data Hackathons to Help Expand Digital Engineering in the Testing Community

Nov. 23, 2021 | By Amanda Miller

So-called “hackers” from three commands competed in a hackathon Nov. 1-5 to help the Air Force Test Pilot School figure out how to manage stores of data in an expansion of digital engineering.

The Air Force Test Center, which operates the school, wants to expand digital engineering from something largely done for testing “into a more collaborative approach between the test units, program offices, and contractors,” according to a news release by center. “This requires appropriate data collection, storage, transport, and sharing at the right security levels.”

Digital engineering, put simply, leaves behind blueprints in favor of continuously evolving digital models.

About 40 troops, government civilians, and contractor employees “merged their different abilities” and came up with ideas for how to analyze data across different data sets, to share data, and to “automate certain activities for increased speed,” said Air Force Col. Keith M. Roessig, the center’s vice commander, in the release.

The hackathon also provided an opportunity for professional development—experience in cloud computing, software coding, and data analytics—as well as to “build a technical community,” the center said.

The hackers “all did a great job of recognizing each other’s strengths and using that knowledge to assign tasks,” said Brandon Stiles, chief engineer for the Test Support Division of the Air Force’s Arnold Engineering Development Complex, Tenn., one of the three commands that took part, along with the 412th Test Wing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., and the 96th Test Wing at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.

They collaborated remotely over the Air Force Chief Data Office’s VAULT cloud platform, which gets its name from its description as making data “visible, accessible, understandable, linked, and trustworthy.”

The participants “were key in helping to examine test data formats from other test mission areas and demonstrating the ability to quickly convert data formats that could be used with Python automated analysis tools,” Stiles said.

Now the center plans to stage quarterly hackathons with the next goal “to not only have more participants, but to work with squadrons and hopefully get a bigger mission impact,” said the Capt. Troy Soileau, chief data officer of the 96th Cyber Test Group, in the release. The next hackathon could be as soon as the first quarter of 2022.

The Air Force first launched a white-hat hacking program in 2017, following up on the Defense Department’s first Hack the Pentagon event. Last year, hackers were invited to take control of a DOD satellite in the first-ever event focused on space-based capabilities.