Austin Visits Non-NATO Partner Georgia to Tout New Russia Deterrence Efforts

Austin Visits Non-NATO Partner Georgia to Tout New Russia Deterrence Efforts

Before Russia took NATO by surprise in 2014, invading Ukraine and taking the Crimean peninsula, some 200 miles from NATO shores, there was Georgia. In the Georgian provinces of South Ossetia and Abkhazia in 2006, Russian President Vladimir Putin spurred a frozen conflict, and Russia still occupies some 20 percent of Georgian territory.

Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III visited Tbilisi on Oct. 18 ahead of the NATO ministerial meetings in Brussels Oct. 21-22. He assured the aspiring NATO member that the U.S. is at its side. During the visit, he signed a defense memorandum to enhance deterrence amid continued Russian hybrid warfare, including disinformation and cyberattacks.

Austin also met with Defense Minister Juansher Burchuladze and Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili while in the Black Sea country. In public remarks, Austin thanked Georgia for contributing forces to Afghanistan and Iraq, and he highlighted progress Georgia is making to reach NATO interoperability.

“Georgia has paid a heavy price with 32 killed in action and 293 wounded in Afghanistan,” Austin said, while underscoring the “tremendous value” of the Georgia-U.S. partnership.

“This is a critical region to us,” he added. “We have many shared interests and, of course, shared values, and we see a number of opportunities for security cooperation.”

Sandwiched between Russia and NATO ally Turkey on the eastern shore of the Black Sea, Georgia had been one of the most vocal pro-western countries in the region, but its ruling party has made recent overtures toward Moscow, former U.S. ambassador to Georgia Ian Kelly indicated in an August Foreign Policy article.

With Russia already strengthening its Black Sea Navy fleet and boosting its anti-access, area denial capabilities near NATO’s eastern flank, Austin’s visit and promise to help resist Russian pressure could not come soon enough.

In 2018, the United States launched a $53.4 million Georgia Defense Readiness Program and began training Georgian troops for the first time to protect their own sovereign territory. The program, run by Army and Marine Corps personnel deployed to Georgia, trained infantry companies and tactical unit commanders while also helping Georgia create policies and processes to train and equip their own forces. During the visit, Austin witnessed a medical training event and met with U.S. special operations forces deployed to Georgia.

With the readiness agreement expiring at the end of 2021, Austin and Burchuladze inked a new Georgia Defense and Deterrence Enhancement Initiative.

The six-year deterrence plan will strengthen and modernize Georgia’s military institutions and further NATO interoperability, focusing on higher-level military units and operations. U.S. personnel will also help train Georgia’s maneuver brigades in combined arms operations to integrate fires and engineering capabilities.

“Georgia continues to make progress in terms of military reform and capabilities,” Austin said after what he called an “excellent brief” by Georgia Defense Forces leaders on areas of improvement.

The agreement will give Georgia additional capability to train their forces, Austin added.

In a meeting with Prime Minister Garibashvili, Austin was forceful in outlining the threat Georgia faces from Russia.

“The United States condemns Russia’s ongoing occupation of Georgia and its attempts to expand influence into the Black Sea region through military coercion and malign activities,” he said. 

Georgian media reported that Garibashvili in public comments following his meeting with Austin later in the day emphasized how the U.S. will help modernize Georgia’s defense forces and declared Georgia “a loyal ally [to the U.S.] in the region.”

VIDEO: From Munitions to Electromagnetic Warfare, Every Mission Capability Area Panel at ASC21

VIDEO: From Munitions to Electromagnetic Warfare, Every Mission Capability Area Panel at ASC21

The Air Force Association’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference in National Harbor, Md., brought together top defense experts in September to discuss some of the biggest topics and challenges facing the Air Force and Space Force in a series of 10 “Mission Capability Area” panels. Those sessions are now available for everyone to view.

Chief Scientist of the Space Force Joel B. Mozer moderated a discussion on Digital Engineering and Advanced Manufacturing. Joining him were:

  • Wallis Laughrey, vice president of strategy and chief transformation officer at Raytheon Intelligence & Space;
  • Eric Hein, vice president for defense advanced development and space programs at Spirit AeroSystems; and
  • Renee Pasman, director of integrated systems at Lockheed Martin.

Chair of the Moorman Center for Space Studies Chris Williams moderated a panel on space and overhead platforms with:

  • Eric J. Brown, senior director for military space mission strategy at Lockheed Martin;
  • Bill Gattle, president of space systems at L3Harris Technologies; and
  • Paul Tilghman, senior director of Azure Spectrum Technologies at Microsoft.

Brig. Gen. Tad D. Clark, director of electromagnetic spectrum superiority, helmed a panel on electromagnetic warfare, joined by:

  • Jerry M. Wohletz, vice president and general manager of electronic combat solutions at BAE Systems;
  • Steven Kiepe from the Leidos Innovation Center; and
  • Anthony Nigara, vice president of strategy and business development for space and airborne systems at L3Harris Technologies.

Yvette S. Weber, associate deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for science, technology, and engineering, oversaw a panel on autonomous systems with:

  • Matthew Boyer, systems engineer senior staff at Elbit Systems of America;
  • Jarod Patton, autonomous systems solution architect at Leidos; and
  • Diem Salmon, adjunct senior fellow at the Center for New American Security.

Brig. Gen. Jeffery D. Valenzia, the Air Force’s cross-functional team lead for the Advance Battle Management System, moderated a panel on ABMS and JADC2. He was joined by:

  • Richard S. Stapp, corporate vice president and chief technology officer at Northrop Grumman;
  • Steve Nordlund, vice president and general manager of Phantom Works at Boeing; and
  • Ross Niebergall, vice president and chief technology officer of L3Harris Technologies.

Maj. Gen. Daniel L. Simpson, assistant deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance,
moderated a panel on command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance—commonly called C4ISR—and was joined by:

  • Matthew Apostolou, director of advanced ISR requirements and integration with Collins Aerospace Systems’ ISR and space solutions division;
  • James “J.R.” Gear, vice president in charge of Washington Operations with L3Harris Technologies; and
  • Mike Shortsleeve, director of strategic development at General Atomics Aeronautical.

Department of the Air Force Chief Data Officer Eileen M. Vidrine oversaw a discussion of data management, focusing on software engineering, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and analytics, and was joined by:

  • Akash Jain, chief technology officer of Palantir Technologies;
  • Thomas Treakle, Dell Technologies services account executive; and
  • Robert Audet, director in the advanced solutions segment for Guidehouse.

Col. Patricia A. Csànk, associate director of resource integration under the deputy chief of staff for logistics, engineering, and force protection, moderated a panel on logistics, sustainment, and mission support. She was joined by:

  • Retired Maj. Gen. Robert McMahon, senior adviser for Systecon;
  • Retired Maj. Gen. Stephen T. “Steve” Sargeant, CEO of Marvin Test Solutions; and
  • Anthony Pedroni, vice president of development for NextEra Energy Resources.

Brig. Gen. Robert K. Lyman, assistant deputy chief of staff for cyber effects operations, led a panel discussion on 5G, cyber operations, and cybersecurity. He was joined by:

  • Retired Col. Lance Spencer, client executive vice president for AT&T’s Global Public Sector;
  • Ed Vasko, director of Boise State University’s Institute of Pervasive Cybersecurity; and
  • Stephen Marker, vice president of strategy & business development cyber systems at General Dynamics Mission Systems;
  • Daniel G. Rice, vice president of 5G.MIL programs at Lockheed Martin.

Col. Michael J. Power, commander of the 90th Maintenance Group, moderated a panel on weapons and munitions, joined by:

  • John “Snooze” Martins, director of international programs for MBDA;
  • Mark Altobelli, director of advanced weapons and missile systems at Boeing’s Phantom Works; and
  • Retired Maj. Gen. Jon Norman, vice president of customer requirements and capabilities for Raytheon Missiles & Defense.
As National AI Panel Shuts Down, New Think Tank Emerges to Continue Its Work

As National AI Panel Shuts Down, New Think Tank Emerges to Continue Its Work

The congressionally chartered National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence has completed its work, but the team that created its 756-page report will continue, backed this time by its former chair, Eric Schmidt, who is committing his own money to the new effort, dubbed the “Special Competitive Studies Project.”

The project is funded by the Eric & Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation, a family-led nonprofit.  

Eric Schmidt was chief executive officer, then executive chairman, at Google and its parent company, Alphabet, from 2001 to 2017, then served as a technical adviser to Alphabet until 2020. He ranks 30th on Forbes’ 2021 list of “400 wealthiest Americans” with a fortune worth $23.5 billion. He has become a major influencer in defense technology and innovation over the past several years. He served on the NSCAI from 2018 to 2021 and simultaneously led the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board for most of that time, which he chaired from 2016 to 2020 as it drafted DOD’s ethical principals for AI

Schmidt was technical adviser when Google briefly joined DOD’s Project Maven, which uses machine learning to identify people and objects in intelligence imagery, in 2018. After Google staff objected, however, Google discontinued its ties with the program. Robert Work, who is credited with starting Project Maven as deputy defense secretary in 2018, was Schmidt’s vice chair on the NSCAI and is his co-chair on the new Special Competitive Studies Project, or SCSP.

Schmidt continues to invest in AI technology and heads the list of investors in AI startup Rebellion Defense, founded in 2019 and reportedly valued at $1 billion as of September. Rebellion’s CEO is Chris Lynch, the founding director of the Defense Digital Service and the driving force behind the “Hack the Pentagon” bounty hunting program and the Pentagon’s failed Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, or JEDI, cloud computing program.

The new SCSP, an LLC within the family nonprofit, aims to make recommendations to the government not only on AI but also on other “emerging technologies” that will “reshape our national security, economy, and society,” according to spokesperson Tara Rigler, who held the same role with the national AI commission. 

Joining Schmidt on the SCSP board of advisors are Work, the former deputy secretary of defense who is a consultant and senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, or CNAS; Michele Flournoy, a CNAS co-founder and its current board chair, and former undersecretary of defense for policy in the Obama administration—Flournoy and Work serve together advising AI contractor SparkCognition Government Services; Nadia Schadlow, former deputy national security adviser for strategy in the Trump administration; and former U.S. representative and chair of the House Armed Services Committee William M. “Mac” Thornberry (R-Texas).

“All potential conflicts of interest will be closely monitored by legal counsel,” Rigler said.

SCSP draws its historical inspiration from the Cold War-era’s Rockefeller Special Studies Project, or SSP, launched in 1956 by Nelson A. Rockefeller, the grandson of John D. Rockefeller Sr., co-founder of Standard Oil. Nelson A. Rockefeller would later become governor of New York then Vice President during Gerald Ford’s presidency. Rockefeller’s project was led by Henry Kissinger, who became national security adviser and Secretary of State under Richard Nixon and Ford. 

“In the midst of the Cold War, as the U.S. was facing roiling domestic and international conditions, Rockefeller and Kissinger brought together some of the nation’s leading thinkers to study the major problems and opportunities confronting the country, to chart a path to revitalize American society, restore a strong bipartisan national security strategy, and renew American leadership,” explains the Oct. 5 news release announcing SCSP’s launch.

Yll Bajraktari, who was the NSCAI’s executive director, will serve as the chief executive officer at SCSP. He was chief of staff to retired Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster during McMaster’s tenure as national security adviser to Donald Trump.

Rigler confirmed that more members of the NSCAI staff are moving over and that SCSP “is still recruiting and hiring additional members, including experts on areas that SCSP will look into.” She said Bajraktari will “build a team of technologists, national security professionals, and subject-matter experts to study and recommend methods to strengthen America’s long-term competitiveness.”

Rigler said SCSP is “building its research plan around the areas that we believe national leaders need to focus on, specifically topic areas essential to ensuring our national competitiveness.”

Editor’s Note: This story was updated at 11:25 a.m. on Oct. 19 to note that the Special Competitive Studies Project has a board of advisors and Yll Bajraktari will serve as SCSP’s chief executive officer.

Lockheed Martin Says It Will Compete for Advanced Fighter Trainer

Lockheed Martin Says It Will Compete for Advanced Fighter Trainer

Lockheed Martin will offer a solution to the Air Force’s new Advanced Tactical Trainer aircraft, a new jet the Air Force is planning to bridge undergraduate flight instruction and full-up fighter certification. However, the company declined to say what it might offer for the nascent competition.

The Air Force issued a request for information seeking industry interest in an Advanced Tactical Trainer on Oct. 12, saying it has a need for at least 100 and perhaps as many as 400 of the new airplanes.

Lockheed Martin “is an air power solutions leader, delivering capabilities across the entire spectrum of training and combat aircraft,” a company spokesperson said. It has made “significant advances in digital engineering and open architectures that are accelerating development, production, upgrades and responsiveness.” The company looks forward to “closely reviewing the requirements” for the ATT system “and developing the best solution to meet the Air Force’s future needs.”

When asked specifically if Lockheed Martin will offer the T-50A—with which it and partner Korea Aerospace Industries finished second in the Air Force’s T-X Advanced Trainer competition—or offer a different airplane, or a clean-sheet design, the spokesperson declined comment.

However, the carefully-worded response suggests that Lockheed Martin might indeed offer a fresh concept, as Boeing’s T-7A Red Hawk was chosen largely because of its tailored approach to the T-X requirement and the record time in which the company designed and fabricated prototypes of the new trainer. Lockheed Martin’s statement emphasizes that it has the capability to do that, as well. In fact, it recently opened a new production facility at its Skunk Works Plant 42 in Palmdale, Calif., specifically for short-run production and rapid prototyping of advanced systems.

Industry officials said at the time of the T-X down-select that Lockheed Martin was taking the Air Force at its word when the service said it preferred a non-developmental airplane for that contest. The company had actually helped KAI develop the T-50 with the intent of offering it to the Air Force as a T-38 replacement in the early 2000s, but that competition was deferred more than a decade.

Service officials said they initially believed a non-developmental T-X approach would offer the lowest risk and price, but Boeing’s digitally-designed proposal, at about $10 billion less than what USAF expected the T-X would cost, persuaded the service that the clean sheet was actually the lowest-cost solution.

Lockheed Martin is likely to secure an Air Force contract for a T-7A surrogate—the T-50—with which the Air Force plans to develop its “Reforge” overhaul of the fighter pilot training enterprise. But service leaders in recent years have touted an aircraft common to the T-7A as offering a two-birds-with-one-stone way to gain another platform without heavy additional development costs, which also has the benefit of using the simulator and training infrastructure and courseware that will come with the T-7A.

The T-7A is not a shoo-in for the ATT program, though. The Air Force has said it’s open to all offerers and wants capabilities—such as wing hardpoints—that the T-7A does not have. The Air Force also wants a less sophisticated combat aircraft on which it can partner with countries lacking the resources for a fighter like the F-35 or F-16. Former Skunk Works president Rob Weiss said the company developed a clean-sheet design for T-X but dropped it when the cost figures suggested the non-developmental approach better met USAF’s needs.

Space Force Shakes Up Acquisition Again in Effort to Achieve Efficiencies

Space Force Shakes Up Acquisition Again in Effort to Achieve Efficiencies

The Space Force confirmed that it will reorganize space acquisition and space policy authorities starting Oct. 18 in an effort to streamline decision-making in line with Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall’s plan announced in August.

As first reported by Breaking Defense on Oct. 15, the Department of the Air Force described a plan to break out space policy from the as-yet unnamed space acquisitions chief. The move would reduce the number of personnel required to sign off on policy decisions by transferring space policy to the Chief of Space Operations and the Secretary of the Air Force.

In August, Kendall described his plan to consolidate the Space Acquisition Directorate from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, or SAF/AQ, into a new organization, Space Acquisition and Integration, or SAF/ SQ. Space acquisition policy remains within SAF/ SQ, while broader space policy moves to Space Force and responsibility for international affairs shifts to the deputy undersecretary of the Air Force for international affairs, or SAF/ IA.

No further details were available by press time.

Kendall in August named Brig. Gen. Steven P. Whitney to head the space acquisitions office until an assistant secretary for space acquisition and integration is named. Whitney has managed the reorganization pending the appointment of that new civilian leader.

Congress has for months railed against the slow pace of space acquisitions reform and the absence of a civilian chief. In a July report, the House Appropriations Committee claimed the Air Force was dragging its feet.

“The Committee remains concerned that the Air Force has not taken more aggressive action in addressing longstanding space acquisition issues,” the report read.

Lawmakers also said the Air Force had “made little progress in defining what the Space Force will be doing that is fundamentally different than when it was a component of the Air Force.”

On Sept. 20 at the Air Force Association’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference, both Kendall and Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond expressed confidence in the reorganization of space acquisition, even though an assistant secretary had not yet been named.

“We’re actually interviewing people right now for the space acquisitions assistant secretary position,” Kendall said at the ASC media briefing, foreshadowing the office reorganization and personnel movement. “So, it’s moving forward. I’m reasonably happy with the pace.”

Raymond commended Kendall for his moves to change the space acquisition process.

“One of the things that Congress discussed when they passed the law that established the Space Force was the need to move at speed and to bring unity of effort across the department to reduce duplication,” Raymond said at the briefing. “This acquisition piece that the Secretary has really advanced from Day 1 coming in the office is a critical part of that.”

AMC Green Lights KC-46 to Refuel F-15s, F-16s; 62 Percent of Receivers Now Cleared

AMC Green Lights KC-46 to Refuel F-15s, F-16s; 62 Percent of Receivers Now Cleared

Air Force F-15s and F-16s are now cleared to refuel from new KC-46A tankers using the air-to-air refueling boom, the head of Air Mobility Command, Gen. Mike Minihan, directed Oct. 15. The move means 62 percent of aircraft that “request air refueling support” from U.S. Transportation Command can now be accommodated using the Pegasus tanker, AMC said.

The order is the third “interim capability release” since July clearing aircraft to refuel from the KC-46, which is operationally restricted due to boom operator display problems. The Air Force had been using the aircraft in a transport role before Air Mobility Command issued recent ICRs approving tanking operations for some airplanes.

The first ICR was issued in July and approved the use of the KC-46’s centerline “hose and drogue” apparatus to refuel Navy, Marine Corps, and allied aircraft that use that system. In the hose and drogue method, the receiving aircraft flies a probe into a basket at the end of a fuel hose deployed from the tanker, and the receiving aircraft does all the maneuvering to make the connection.

The second ICR came in August, when then-AMC commander (now TRANSCOM commander) Gen. Jacqueline D. Van Ovost approved several “heavies”—the C-17 airlifter, the B-52 bomber, and the KC-46 itself—to refuel behind the KC-46, using the aircraft’s flying boom system. With the boom method, an operator onboard the tanker flies a hard, telescoping refueling pipe into a receptacle on the receiving aircraft. On the KC-46, the operator is stationed just behind the cockpit and uses a 3-D video display to conduct the refueling. Those displays suffer from latency and blind spots in certain conditions, causing contractor Boeing and the Air Force to restrict the boom’s use.

The latest ICR clears “all variants” of the F-15 and F-16 to tank up from the KC-46, AMC said. The move “allows the Pegasus aircraft to accept operational taskings which would otherwise be filled by the KC-135 Stratotanker and KC-10 Extender, increasing the force’s refueling capacity,” the command said in a press release.

The Air Force is still gauging whether refueling the F-22 and F-35 fighters and the B-2 bomber from the Pegasus is safe. The KC-46 has previously scratched the sensitive treatments on stealth aircraft in testing, potentially compromising their low observability.

“There is no timeline associated with the overall ICR plan,” AMC said in its statement. Rather, aircraft are being cleared to refuel from the KC-46 when it’s deemed safe to do so.

The ICR plan “focuses on establishing incremental confidence measures” that allow the AMC commander “and other senior leaders” to “quantitatively and qualitatively” assess the aircraft’s “achievements at ICR milestones.” Crews flying the KC-46 will continue to “fly training, exercise and demonstration missions until all operational confidence measures are met,” AMC said.

Van Ovost Takes Command of TRANSCOM, Pledging to ‘Underpin Lethality’

Van Ovost Takes Command of TRANSCOM, Pledging to ‘Underpin Lethality’

Air Force Gen. Jacqueline D. Van Ovost assumed command of U.S. Transportation Command during a ceremony at Scott Air Force Base, Ill., on Oct. 15, becoming just the second woman to lead a combatant command.

Taking over for Army Gen. Stephen R. Lyons, Van Ovost will lead TRANSCOM as it comes off a string of high-profile logistical challenges.

“You had to keep the American military moving during a historic pandemic, and you delivered,” Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III told the troops of TRANSCOM during the Oct. 15 ceremony. “You had to execute a complex retrograde in Somalia, and you delivered. And you had to conduct the largest noncombatant evacuation airlift in American history in Afghanistan, and you delivered.”

Van Ovost played a key role in these challenges, especially the Afghanistan evacuation, as head of Air Mobility Command, and she has spent much of her career dealing with logistics, previously leading an air refueling squadron, a flying training wing, and the Presidential Airlift Wing. 

Those experiences, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley said, make her uniquely qualified to lead the more than 122,000 Active-duty, National Guard, Reserve, and civilian personnel who are part of TRANSCOM. 

“The sky is the limit with Jackie Van Ovost,” Milley said. “She will take TRANSCOM into the future. She will take you to your next rendezvous with destiny, as we say in the Army.”

Both Austin and Milley emphasized the importance of TRANSCOM to the U.S. in a new phase of strategic competition with peer adversaries such as China and Russia.

“Our overmatch capability will continue to rely on the logistical prowess and the ability to project power by TRANSCOM at great distances,” Milley said.

“Logistics remain at the core of our warfighting concept and our ability to project and sustain combat power,” added Austin. “That’s why this command is central to our operations in the 21st century and to our vision of truly integrated deterrence.”

Van Ovost noted that TRANSCOM’s mission is expansive and not always confined to combat operations.

“We understand our mission is critical for national defense to meet our national security objectives. I also know our role is not always to provide combat power, because we deliver hope on behalf of the American people,” Van Ovost said. “I’ve seen our values reflected in the kindness and compassion demonstrated by our teammates executing humanitarian operations around the globe and right here at home.”

At the same time, she said, as the U.S. shifts from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to competition with countries such as China, the command’s military demands will change.

“Know that TRANSCOM’s No. 1 priority remains constant: Warfighting readiness is the surest way to prevent war. We expect that our freedom to maneuver will be challenged; our logistics lines will be contested at every level. But together with our coalition partners and our commercial teammates, we will flatten the globe and underpin the lethality of our nation’s military arm,” Van Ovost said. 

To meet these new challenges, the military needs “every Jackie Van Ovost that we can get,” Austin said, pointing to her trailblazing career as a test pilot who has flown more than 30 kinds of aircraft for the Air Force.

“Gen. Van Ovost, in the 21st century, careers like yours are a fighting imperative,” Austin said. “And as she likes to say, as young women looking up, it’s hard to be what you cannot see. So Gen. Van Ovost knows the importance of breaking barriers, of getting results in bringing teams together. And she’s used to challenges that have never been tackled before.”

Van Ovost is currently the only female four-star general in the Defense Department and just the fourth in Air Force history. She and Gen. Lori J. Robinson are now the only women to lead a unified combatant command—Robinson headed U.S. Northern Command and NORAD from 2016 to 2018. 

Their small club will expand in the coming weeks, though—Army Lt. Gen. Laura J. Richardson is set to receive her fourth star and take command of U.S. Southern Command in a ceremony Oct. 29.

C-17 Pilot is Biden’s Nominee for USAF Installations Czar

C-17 Pilot is Biden’s Nominee for USAF Installations Czar

The Biden Administration plans to nominate Ravi Chaudhary, a former Air Force C-17 pilot and member of the Senior Executive Service with the Federal Aviation Administration, as assistant secretary of the Air Force for installations, environment, and energy.

Self-employed since August 2020, according to his LinkedIn profile, Chaudhary previously served at the Federal Aviation Administration. In his last post, he was director of advanced programs and innovation in the FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation, where he presided over the nascent private launch industry.

He was previously the FAA’s executive director of regions and center operations, where he oversaw safety operations, emergency preparedness, and facilities management. In that position, he was required to coordinate with the Air Force as he oversaw development of the “NextGen” FAA air traffic control system, short for Next Generation Air Transportation System. NextGen has moved ahead in fits and starts as the FAA struggled to stay ahead of new technologies.

Chaudhary served a 22-year career in the Air Force, according to his White House bio, during much of which he was a C-17 pilot. He also worked as a uniformed engineer with the Space and Missile Systems Center, where he was a specialist on Delta II launch vehicle avionics. In his last USAF assignment, he was chief of strategy and integration, and prior to that, was a speechwriter for Air Force Secretary Michael B. Donley and Chief of Staff Gen. Norton A. Schwartz. He served as a member of the Obama administration’s President’s Advisory Commission on Asian Americans.

An Air Force Academy graduate, Chaudhary holds a doctorate in executive leadership and innovation from Georgetown University.

If confirmed, Chaudhary would succeed John Henderson in the assistant secretary role. Henderson left the position in January with the change of administrations, but his tenure focused on several issues likely to be front and center for his successor.

These include recovery from natural disasters at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., and Offutt Air Force Base, Neb.; improving base resilience to natural disasters; “off-the-grid” base power generation; improved housing for Airmen; and resolving USAF’s $33 billion backlog of real property maintenance.

Chaudhary would also become the point person for the Department of the Air Force’s re-look at the selection of Alabama as the new headquarters for U.S. Space Command, which has been challenged by members of Congress from Colorado and other states.

Contractor Employees Who Object to Vaccines May Not Get Much Backup

Contractor Employees Who Object to Vaccines May Not Get Much Backup

As the military’s COVID-19 vaccination deadlines close in, federal contractors are also demanding employees get vaccinated, driven by President Biden’s Sept. 9 executive order.  

Boeing confirmed Oct. 14 that its U.S. employees must be vaccinated by Dec. 8. “To ensure compliance with President Biden’s executive order for federal contractors, Boeing is requiring its U.S-based employees to either show proof of vaccination or have an approved reasonable accommodation (based on a disability or sincerely held religious belief) by Dec. 8,” the company said in a statement. “Boeing will continue to carefully monitor guidance from public health agencies, and requirements from federal, state and local governments to inform our COVID-19 policies. We continue to prioritize the health and safety of all our employees.”

L3Harris and Honeywell reportedly have announced Dec. 8 deadlines as well, and Lockheed Martin says on its website that it is “following a U.S. federal government requirement for all federal contractors and subcontractors with a covered contract to observe COVID-19 safety practices … and become fully vaccinated.” 

The orders are setting up potential challenges and conflicts as unions, individuals, state governors, and the courts take up challenges. The Biden administration maintains that the order is within the president’s powers and that federal authority supersedes state regulators with regard to federal contractors.

In defiance of local and state measures prohibiting vaccine mandates, such as in Texas, the Pentagon argued in a statement Thursday that federal law supersedes those rules, according to Defense One.

About 63 percent of working-age Americans were vaccinated as of Oct. 7, according to the White House. Assuming those working for federal contractors are roughly consistent with that trend, that suggests thousands if not tens of thousands of unvaccinated employees stand to lose their jobs if they choose to remain unvaccinated or they fail to get a waiver. Yet what it will take to get a waiver is also unclear, as is who gets to determine what constitutes a “sincerely held religious belief” or who gets to decide which appeals have merit.

Based on “a rapid rise in cases and hospitalizations,” Biden issued executive orders Sept. 9 mandating that federal employees get vaccinated by Dec. 8 and requiring contractors and subcontractors to comply with the same guidance issued by the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force. 

Some employees have already begun to object. Protesters rallied against the federal mandates in Florida on Oct. 11, including a Northrop Grumman structural aircraft mechanic who told Florida Today she and coworkers were “backed into a corner.”

The Archbishop of the Catholic Archdiocese of the Military said in a statement that a broad definition of conscientious objection should apply, but others have been less supportive. The American Civil Liberties Union, which often sides with individuals against institutions, supports the government mandate, as does the libertarian CATO Institute, which cautiously acknowledges “a health emergency, which means that suitably modified, narrowly-tailored, time-limited rules may be justified.”