Why Intelligence Agencies Think They Can Finally Build a Common Picture for Warfighters

March 5, 2025 | By Shaun Waterman

AURORA, Colo.—The defense intelligence community has tried three times in the past decade to build a “common intelligence picture”—a single data stream providing the information that combatant commanders, combined forces air component commanders (CFACCs), and their subordinates need to make decisions about the battlefield.

The first two attempts failed. But Greg Ryckman, deputy director for global integration for the Defense Intelligence Agency, said March 4 at the AFA Warfare Symposium that things are different today: Technology had improved, cultural barriers had eroded to an extent, and there is a new sense of urgency.

“We can’t afford not to do this, right?” Ryckman said, a nod to the looming 2027 deadline that China has set for being ready to invade Taiwan.

CIP vs. COP

A common intelligence picture, or CIP, is not the same as a common operating picture (COP), explained retired Air Force Col. Frederick “Trey” Coleman III, the former commander of the 505th Command and Control Wing.

“The CIP is fusing intelligence sources,” telling the commander everything that’s known about a particular enemy unit, he told Air & Space Forces Magazine on the sidelines of the event. “It is very qualitative.”

By contrast, he said, a COP is more geospatial, like a map showing the location of enemy and friendly units, “a very quantitative/defined depiction of where blue and red forces are located in a given area,” said Coleman, now chief product officer for military AI outfit Raft.

Both CIPs and COPs “are only as good as the data behind them,” said Coleman, “This is a data problem.”

Ryckman said that currently, different intelligence providers are each producing their own CIP, which is contrary to the spirit of the enterprise. “The most important thing about the common intelligence picture is that it is common—everyone should be looking at the same picture.”

Uncommon Intelligence Pictures

Despite the name, there has been little in common between different intelligence pictures, retired Col. Jon “BigDogg” Rhone, former commander of the 505th Test and Evaluation Group, said during a different session.

“The people that make the decisions are making decisions based on multiple panes of glass. It wasn’t too long ago that we were looking at anywhere from six to 13 different panes of glass, different information systems that the human brain has got to process, and that brain has to be the integrator,” said Rhone, who now works for SAIC.

Ryckman said the multiplicity of sources is the problem that CIP is designed to solve.

“What we have right now is a whole bunch of uncommon intelligence pictures out there, as everybody tries to solve this problem from where they sit. We can’t afford that anymore,” said Ryckman, “We cannot inject confusion into the [battlefield] situation.”

Ryckman spoke on a panel with Lt. Gen. Leah Lauderback and Maj. Gen. Gregory Gagnon, the top intelligence officers in the Air Force and Space Force, respectively.

The objective of the Department of Defense, explained Gagnon, “is to deliver unified action. That requires a unified set of understandings about where the enemy is and what their intent is. So this [common intelligence picture, or CIP] is a very important initiative.”

A potential high-end conflict with the likes of China is “really all about speed and scale,” said Lauderback. Targeting is about speed, she said, “but I think our intelligence problems are more concerned with the scale, the number of objects that we think that we are going to have to track.”

Drowning in Data

The danger, Lauderback said, is that analysts could find themselves “drowning, almost, in data.”

Ryckman agreed, noting the explosion of sensors and intel sources. “If you’d asked me five years ago, I’d have said our analysts need more data. Today, I would tell you that they’re swimming in data, and they have to figure out how to make sense of the data.”

Given all that, he continued, “no human has the ability to be an all-source analyst. If you don’t use machines to augment your human skill set, you’re a some-source analyst, because there’s no way for you to personally read every message that pertains to the problem you’re trying to solve,” he said.

In October 2024, the DIA was given the lead role in coordinating action on a CIP between the four Pentagon combat support agencies and set up a joint program management office with elements from the other three agencies—NRO, NGA, and NSA. Now, the office is working to bring the services in as well.

The CIP would enable data about enemy positions, capabilities, and intentions to be pushed down and out to the CFACC and their team in the AOC, to the wings and even beyond, said Lauderback. “We have to still get those commanders on the ground the intelligence that they need, so they can understand the battle space in those tactical moments, that will happen on an hourly basis in conflict,” she said.

Advances in Technology

Advances in technology could make a CIP possible this third time around, Ryckman said. Such a system requires an object-based approach, which brings together all the information about that object. For instance, a tank object would bring together all the data about its weapons capabilities, armor, electronic signature, and more. Being able to scale that to thousands of objects in a battlespace is impossible without new technology.

In previous efforts, Ryckman said, the different intelligence agencies within the Department of Defense “all looked at it from our independent contributions to building a CIP, as opposed to building an enterprise CIP, and figuring out what piece of that each of us could individually bring to the fight. So in terms of culture, we probably weren’t where we needed to be.”

CCA Logistics: How USAF and Industry Plan to Rise to the Challenge

March 5, 2025 | By Amanda Miller

AURORA, Colo.—This week’s revelation that the Air Force has designated its first uncrewed fighters set the stage for the makers of the two aircraft to talk about the logistics of deploying them to dispersed locations.

Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin revealed the alphanumeric designations—General Atomics’ YFQ-42 and Anduril Industries’ YFQ-44—on March 3 at the AFA Warfare Symposium. The two aircraft were the first to receive designations as part of the Air Force’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft program. The Air Force envisions incorporating CCA drones into formations led by manned fighters.

The ability to place CCA drones across scattered locations within range of an enemy provided one of the prevailing cases for their development.

Distributed basing creates “multiple dilemmas for adversaries,” said Maj. Gen. Joseph D. Kunkel, the Air Force’s director of force design, integration, and wargaming. Those adversaries must then “make choices about whether they’re going to target or not—that’s a really big deal for us.”

At the same time, though, “that distributed basing also creates a lot of inefficiencies in how you might sustain something,” Kunkel noted in a discussion with industry representatives March 5.

Both drones are in the prototype phase.

Mike Atwood, vice president of advanced systems for General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, said his company’s design mitigates that issue because it uses components already in MQ-9 Reapers, meaning it will have “a huge infrastructure of parts already deployed around the globe.”

Anduril Industries, meanwhile, decided early on that “everything had to be easily accessible” for maintenance and repairs, said Andrew Van Timmeren, the company’s senior director for autonomous airpower. The company has “virtual models of people reaching into places” to ensure ease of access and “simplicity, low sustainment, [and] low maintenance.”

In addition to simple designs and easily available parts, Kunkel said he has been thinking about “the best way to conduct logistics under attack,“ mostly by “keeping as much of the logistics out of that area where it can be attacked” as possible.

CCAs might themselves provide part of the solution to their own logistics puzzle. Kunkel described how the Air Force sometimes sends MQ-9s when it needs to transport parts between bases, and Atwood said one reason General Atomics included an internal weapons bay in its design was “for carrying not just missiles and kinetics” but also to “hide where you’ve put your most sensitive stuff.”

In keeping with the overall CCA concept, Van Timmeren said CCA munitions should also be “affordable and mass producible. … You don’t need exquisite munitions.”

To prepare the Airmen who will ultimately work on CCAs and possibly their logistics, Kunkel said Air Education and Training Command is “putting a lot of thought into that,” while the Experimental Operations Unit at Creech Air Force Base, Nev., is “putting these capabilities in the hands of warfighters; they’re going to figure that out.”

Kunkel said the uncrewed fighters are “going to change how we achieve air superiority,” characterizing their arrival as “just fantastic.”

AMC Finishing Up Analysis for Next-Generation Tanker

March 5, 2025 | By David Roza

AURORA, Colo.—Air Mobility Command is nearly done submitting its analysis of alternatives for the Next-Generation Air-Refueling System (NGAS), Gen. John D. Lamontagne said March 5 at the AFA Warfare Symposium.

“Most of that has been submitted,” to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the AMC boss said. “We’re following up with a couple finishing touches here over the next month or two.”

An analysis of alternatives is a comparison of solutions for military needs, with the goal of selecting the best option to guide the next step of the acquisition process. Then-Air Force acquisition executive Andrew Hunter previously said the AOA would be finished by fall 2024.

The NGAS analysis focused on three factors, Lamontagne said.

“It effectively looks at the trade-offs between how big does the runway need to be; how much fuel can you deliver at range; and the signature management—how far we can go forward into the threat environment—and the trade-offs across those three,” he explained.

The need for a new refueling platform is urgent, as the KC-135, which makes up the bulk of the Air Force’s tanker fleet, flies deeper into its sixth decade of service. Responding to a conflict with the KC-135 today would be like responding to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, in a P-51, B-17, or other World War II-era aircraft, Lamontagne said.

“Those airplanes would have been 60 years old around when 9/11 happened,” he said. “The 135 has served us well, but it is time to recapitalize that fleet going forward.”

The same day, Lamontagne’s boss, Gen. Randall Reed, the head of U.S. Transportation Command, made a similar point to the Senate Armed Services Committee. The Air Force plans to buy 179 KC-46 tankers to replace about half of the KC-135 fleet, but the average age of the remaining KC-135s will be 67 by the time the Air Force accepts the last KC-46 contract, Reed said.

“Over the next decade, the aging KC-135 aircraft fleet will be an ever-increasing readiness concern,” Reed wrote in a statement. “It is critical that the Air Force continues a full recapitalization program while investing in a future Next Generation Air-Refueling System to maintain credible capacity and provide the persistent connectivity, improved survivability, and increased agility necessary to operate in contested environments.”

Over the past few years, industry has offered a range of ideas for what NGAS might look like. In August 2023, the Department of the Air Force tapped startup JetZero to build a prototype Blended-Wing Body (BWB) aircraft for testing and demonstrating new technologies. The Air Force is now collecting data from flight tests of a subscale BWB demonstrator, and while the BWB effort is not officially connected to NGAS, it will likely inform NGAS analysis and next-gen airlift discussions, an Air Force spokesperson said in January.

Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works offered a crewed flying wing concept and, more recently, a stealthy, autonomous design. The latter would likely be smaller than today’s tankers in order to accompany stealth aircraft into combat zones.

Hunter previously estimated that an NGAS would be available around 2033 to 2035. In the meantime, Air Force officials have called for a “bridge tanker” to take over for some of the remaining KC-135s.

Lamontagne called for modernizing the mobility fleet writ large with sensors, beyond line-of-sight communications, tactical datalinks, and defensive systems.

“Great powers have systems that can range us from hundreds of miles away, both in the air and on the ground, and we need to be able to sense and make sense of those threats,” he said.

AMC is also working through a capabilities-based assessment of requirements for a next-generation airlift platform, Lamontagne said, though the need for that is not so urgent.

“We want to figure out what those next requirements look like before we fly the wings off the C-17,” he said. “The good news is, I think we have a lot of time. There’s a healthy amount of life left in the C-17, but we want to stay in front of that.”

NATO Shifts Strategy Based on Lessons Learned from Ukraine

March 5, 2025 | By Unshin Lee Harpley

AURORA, Colo.—NATO is evolving its defense strategy and military posture, drawing on lessons learned from Ukraine’s conflict with Russia, officials said at the AFA Warfare Symposium.

“Ukraine is covering its entire nation and 1,000 meters below (the surface) with acoustic sensors for less than 50 million euros,” Tom Goffus, NATO’s Assistant Secretary General for Operations, cited as an example during a panel discussion. “It’s crazy what they’re doing with this, and we’re trying to move it back up a little bit more to the strategic level … as we just opened the lessons learned center in Poland.”

That center, the Joint Analysis Training and Education Center (JATEC), launched last month in Poland to leverage real-time lessons from the ongoing conflict to inform NATO’s defense planning. A military-civilian partnership, it includes contributions from Ukrainian personnel’s front-line experience. Its goal is to provide the alliance with “the best possible understanding of adversarial warfighting tactics.”

The cellphone-based acoustic sensors, which detect drones by sound, are just one example that has caught the attention of military leaders, including Gen. James B. Hecker, head of U.S. Air Forces in Europe and NATO Allied Air Command. These sensors relay real-time data to mobile teams, allowing them to intercept drones with minimal training. Hecker said last fall that he plans to integrate this technology for low-altitude surveillance.

“Collective action rests on the foundation of shared awareness, and it takes real work to achieve that shared awareness,” Goffus said of the center, arguing that in 2014, allies failed to act decisively when Russia annexed Crimea due to a lack of shared understanding. “Some folks believe that if we declare peace, the next day the requirement to support Ukraine goes to zero. That’s not true, because we all know, after 2008 in Georgia, 2014 in Crimea, and 2022 with the full-scale invasion (of Ukraine), Putin’s coming back. So, we need to rebuild the Ukrainian army when peace breaks out, and then we build it up to deter future aggression.”

Hecker also stressed the importance of sharing tactics and information among allies, particularly for air and missile defense and air base defense.

“I’ve had the opportunity to talk to the Ukrainian Air Chief once every two weeks or so, and they’ve been very successful not getting their aircraft hit on the ground,” said Hecker during a March 4 panel discussion. “‘You never take off and land in the same airfield,’” he said, quoting the Ukrainians.

The challenge for NATO lies in managing many airfields across a massive region, something the Air Force has tried to address with its Agile Combat Employment (ACE) strategy.

“The problem is, I can only protect a few of them,” Hecker explained.

NATO now prioritizes key bases, using the ACE concept to rotate aircraft and deploy decoys for defense. With Russia’s targeting cycles getting faster, Hecker emphasized that aircraft must operate in much shorter windows to ensure survival.

“We’re not talking weeks anymore, we’re talking days, and sometimes hours, if you want to survive,” said Hecker.

Moving between bases, however, raises the issue of interoperability challenges.

“It’d be great if we just all bought the same thing, because then it’s automatically interoperable,” Hecker said, pointing to the F-35 as an example of successful interoperability, with plans for 750 F-35 jets across Europe by 2034.

But he said such cases are rare, and NATO faces broader challenges when it comes to integrating diverse defense systems. According to Hecker, NATO must be capable of detecting and neutralizing threats across a broad spectrum “from low-altitude drones to hypersonic missiles.” NATO’s strategy to achieve this is known as “integration by design,” which encourages members to purchase systems that meet shared defense requirements while ensuring open architecture for interoperability. “Sometimes we’re successful, sometimes we’re not, but that’s the way we’re trying to do that,” Hecker added.

While NATO and Ukraine have built up strong ties, the U.S.-Ukraine relationship has hit a rough patch. The U.S. has halted intelligence sharing and military aid to Ukraine, triggered by a heated exchange between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House last week. CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed the intelligence sharing pause, stating it affects both military and intelligence fronts, in an interview on March 5.

Zelenskyy’s visit was initially intended to sign a landmark agreement allowing the U.S. to mine Ukraine’s minerals. The deal was scrapped after tensions flared between the two presidents and Vice President JD Vance.

Since then, Zelenskyy has issued a statement expressing willingness to consider a phased truce with Russia, should Russia agree to the same. He also thanked President Trump for his support and described the Oval Office meeting as “regrettable.” The White House has yet to comment on the matter.

Space Force to Stand Up Guardian Recruiting Squadron with Mandate for New Mindset

March 5, 2025 | By Chris Gordon

AURORA, Colo.—The Space Force is establishing its first Guardian recruiters as the service seeks to take greater ownership of its force from day one, military officials told Air & Space Forces Magazine.

Currently, the Air Force Recruiting Service (ARFS) runs recruiting for the Space Force. However, AFRS and the Space Force are setting up a detachment at the agency’s headquarters at Joint Base San Antonio Lackland, Texas, with the aim of setting up a full squadron of around 30 Guardians later this year—a little less than one-third have gone through recruiting school.

“The Air Force has been a phenomenal partner with the Space Force in doing the recruiting for us. We didn’t have the infrastructure when we stood up,” Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force John F. Bentivegna said in an interview at the AFA Warfare Symposium.

“But all that to be said, we recognize that this is a service responsibility. This is a service obligation to attract and recruit our own, so as we were building capacity. … We have to start investing in recruiting. And we sent a couple of people down to the Recruiting Service to help facilitate the recruitment of Guardians in the Air Force ecosystem. But the big change was we were ready to start putting more skin in the game,” he said.

Previously, the Air Force recruiters who were focused on bringing in new Guardians were scattered around the country, noted Brig. Gen. Christopher R. Amrhein, the commander of the Air Force Recruiting Service. Now, the Space Force and AFRS want to set up a dedicated unit that would enable Guardians to speak to potential recruits directly.

“They were kind of scattered, and what we wanted to be able to do is have a consolidated squadron based out of San Antonio that is a direct report to the AFRS commander,” Amrhein said. “I wanted them to have literally the closest touch points, with marketing, with operations, with medical waivers, or our communications folks, because they’re building this, and so if they’re in an embedded around the headquarters, then those touch points are there.”

That headquarters approach will enable the Guardians at AFRS—currently under a detachment led by Lt. Col. Jason Cano, the Space Force Recruiting Branch Chief—to pursue recruiting more effectively.

“‘Do we have all the recruiting ingredients right? And what other opportunities are there?” Amrhein asked. “There was a potential that we were going to put Guardians embedded in squadrons, what we found is that we think we can build a better synergy” with a dedicated unit, Amrhein added.

Both Amrhein and Bentivegna praised current Guardian recruits as highly motivated and intelligent. But they said there is room for tweaks.

The Air Force is a massive organization, with an annual goal of 33,100 Active-Duty recruits and a total strength of nearly 700,000 Airmen across Active-Duty, the Air National Guard, and the Air Force Reserve, and with over 150 Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSC), the service term for career fields. The Space Force, meanwhile, has three enlisted career fields, five officer career fields, fewer than 10,000 uniformed Guardians, and is seeking to recruit 800 Guardians in 2025.

“We started to identify Guardians who were going to help build the recruitment strategy for the service,” Bentivegna said, adding that eight USSF recruiters have been identified so far. “They’ve actually gone to recruiting school with the Air Force, they went through that training, and they’re in the process. Several of them are already in Texas [at the AFRS headquarters] … Essentially, by the beginning of the summer, we’re hoping to have the initial cadre of trained Guardians that are down there, and then they’re going to start working through what is the recruiting strategy for the service.”

Bentivegna said he wanted Guardians to be like sports teams “scouting” prospects, a theme he has pushed given the Space Force’s role as a specialty service. He said even a professional sports team reached out about identifying talent.

“I use the terminology [of scouting], having these initial cadres of Guardians down there think about a process, a philosophy: how do we scout the right talent to come into the service and just take a different approach?” he said. “I use a different word because I want them to think about it differently. I’m afraid if I keep just using ‘recruiting,’ they’re just going to go right to here’s the checklist, here’s the playbook that the other services use, we’re just going to do that. But if I call it something different they’re going to think about it differently … start to think about what scouting in the Space Force looks like in the future, not just do the same as everyone else.”

Bentivegna said he wants Guardians to be keen observers of talent and not apply a preexisting model. That is necessary, he said, because of the unique skills the Space Force needs to attract.

“You think about the only three [enlisted] functional areas that we do in the Space Force: cyber operations, space operations, and intelligence—even from on the enlisted side, very complex, very, very challenging technical training,” he said. “Then operationally, what we’re asking these young men and women to do, even though they’re wearing [enlisted rank] stripes, is difficult. There’s some ability to learn to critically think that has to be applied to do that.”

Once a recruit enlists, Bentivegna sees possible changes as they undergo basic military training and tech school.

U.S. Space Force recruits stand for a group photo alongside 362nd Recruiting Command Squadron leadership after a total force enlistment ceremony at the Astronomy Association of Arizona Lunar Eclipse event May 15, 2022, in Buckeye, Ariz. U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Matt Davis

“That transformation from civilian to Guardian should be transformative,” he said. “If we have an attrition rate, I’m OK with that. … We’re able to truly stress and assess the capability of someone to be a Guardian operationally. … These have to be meaningful and transformative processes that we have in the initial year of a Guardian’s life. And so it should be difficult. We should stress them, and I’m OK with it if we accept some risk on the front end as we’re working through this.”

One thing the Space Force already knows is that Guardians recruits are generally older than other services.

“The life experience, whether we’ve had individuals that own businesses, individuals married with children, have already had another kind of a career before coming over. We’re just attracting and recruiting a different group of individuals,” Bentivegna said. “If I have a 35-year-old who has a master’s degree, has a cyber business, and has a house they’re paying a mortgage on back home, do I really need to necessarily go through the room and check for dust in the locker now? … It teaches them discipline. But I think some of these individuals have already shown through life they have discipline. They know how to manage their time.”

That doesn’t mean relaxing standards, and may mean increasing them, he said.

“Because they’re more mature, I think maybe I could stress them a little bit more, because maybe they bring a little bit more to the table that allows me to put that training and expectation further to the left … and less of a burden on the operational side,” Bentivegna said.

Space Force Takes New Approach to Ground Control Systems

March 5, 2025 | By Greg Hadley

AURORA, Colo.—The Space Force is modernizing its approach to ground control software, taking a more modular, agile, and iterative approach in a drive to overcome the bugs, holdups and delays that have plagued complex ground control systems in the past, leaders said at the AFA Warfare Symposium.

More rapid, modular development for the software used to command and control missile warning and orbital warfare follows modern commercial best practice, but concerns remain over how fast USSF can change its approach and how well it can integrate disparate systems.

“Ground isn’t equally important to [space components]—I think it’s more important,” said Col. Robert Davis, program executive officer of SSC’s space sensing directorate. “I’ve been really trying to carry that message in my team: Ground’s often been an afterthought. A lot of the resources and attention has been put to the space segment, for good reason, but … we have to focus on the ground, at least as much, probably more.”

Former Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition Frank Calvelli ranked focus on ground systems among his nine tenets for successful acquisition—spelling out that he wanted program managers to “Acquire ground and software intensive systems in smaller more manageable pieces that can be delivered faster.”

Delays have plagued programs like the OCX system for GPS satellites and the ATLAS program for command and control of space domain awareness assets. The Future Operationally Resilient Ground Evolution (FORGE) has also come under scrutiny; the program is for command and control of missile warning satellites like Next-Gen OPIR, in geosynchronous and polar orbits, and Resilient MW/MT, in medium-Earth orbit. The Government Accountability Office warned last year that FORGE must be mature by the end of fiscal 2026to meet the Next-Gen OPIR Polar launch schedule.

SSC announced March 3 it had awarded a $151 million contract to BAE Systems for prototype FORGE command and control software. It will join a framework system, which Davis described as the hardware and operating system to host the control software, and that has already been fielded at Buckley Space Force Base, Colo.

Davis told reporters at the AFA Warfare Symposium that other modules include a mission data processing application and relay ground stations. SSC’s modular approach treats FORGE as a “system of systems, program of programs,” he said, ensuring enhanced cybersecurity and resiliency for the ground ssytem.

Davis’ boss, SSC commander Lt. Gen. Philip A. Garrant, was confident that FORGE will be ready to support new satellites when the time comes: “We are very happy with the results and what FORGE on the floor has shown at Buckley already with the initial instantiations,” he said. SSC is “very confident that it will be running on time to support the satellite constellation.”

More milestones are still to come. Davis said a version of the data processing application will be delivered this summer, followed by an interim version of the command-and-control software called NIO that the team is pursuing as “risk mitigation,” which will eventually flow into the final version being built by BAE. But even when that comes, Davis said, there will be more to do.

“We’re going to continue to deliver, not in a big-bang software way, but in more of an agile way,” Davis said. “The capability, depending on the sequencing, could be a couple times a year or could be once a year.”

Agile software development is standard practice in the commercial world, such as with phone apps, where updates are rolled out frequently; similarly, the Space Development Agency plans to update its fleet of low-Earth-orbit satellites every two years following a comparable model. And the Space Rapid Capabilities Office is also pursuing an iterative approach to a program called Rapid Resilient Command and Control, which will provide C2 software for orbital warfare.

ground command-and-control .

Kelly Hammett, head of the Space RCO, said he intends to “go to nontraditional small business software writers, who do this for a living, instead of, I’ll say, the traditional defense primes, who have struggled in many cases to provide ground software on a previously approved baseline.”

Like Davis, Hammett said his team broke down R2C2 into chunks—first an environment on Amazon Web Services’ cloud; next, a digital infrastructure using the Air Force’s Platform One cloud solution, and finally software applications providedΩ by 20 different vendors.

Like FORGE, R2C2 will be iterative. “We’re trying to show [the Space Force] what right looks like in terms of cloud-based and agile software development that delivers on a cadence,” Hammett said. “It’s not ‘wait five years till you get working software.’ You get something in 14 months, and then you get another version. We’ve delivered five [prototype] versions of software for R2C2, and are delivering version 1.0 in April … the operational version. We’ll be flying satellites off of that software.”

Now comes the really hard part, Hammett said: Getting multiple systems to work together. “The number one challenge, I really think, for the Space Force, is integrating the capabilities that we are developing into a coherent system of systems that can operate at the timing and tempo needed to fight a fight in space if we need to do that,” Hammett said.

“We’re building a bunch of stuff,” he continued. “We need to connect it appropriately, and that’s why we took on R2C2, but that’s just a piece. We’re doing the tactical C2 for orbital warfare. We’ve got [another program called Kronos] out of SSC doing operational C2 for that. And then we’ve got all the other mission areas.”

All that suggests that, as with the other ground challenges, integration will likely take not just time and persistence—but a gradual and iterative approach.

WATCH: Examining the State of Air Force Readiness

March 5, 2025 | By Tobias Naegele

AURORA, Colo.—Retired Air Force Col. John “JV” Venable, a former F-16 pilot and a senior fellow at the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, visited with Air & Space Forces Magazine at the AFA Warfare Symposium to talk about the state of readiness across the Air Force, from spare parts to flying hours.

How Flying Test Bed Work Has Helped B-21 Make Good Progress

March 5, 2025 | By John A. Tirpak

AURORA, Colo.—The first B-21 bomber is making good progress through its flight testing campaign and has required minimal software tweaks, building on extensive shakeouts of its systems carried out on a flying test bed, the president of Northrop Grumman’s aeronautics division said at the AFA Warfare Symposium on March 5.

Tom Jones, speaking on a panel about next-generation aircraft, said he is “very pleased” with both the test results and the cadence of B-21 testing, saying the new bomber flies sorties at least twice a week at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.

The B-21 has been in testing for a little more than a year now, but the program is largely classified, and Jones’ remarks are the first update on the aircraft’s performance in months.

Given that it has been the first year of testing an aircraft with so many new technologies, Jones said, the B-21’s progress has been ahead of expectations and “we’re seeing a good margin” on performance. He also said there has only been one software change for the B-21 in its first year.

Jones chalked up those successes in large part to extensive ground testing and more than 1,000 flight hours on a flying test bed that evaluates the B-21’s internal systems like “hardware, software, navigation, communication suites.”

Combined, ground and flying test bed activities have helped account for “about a 50 percent reduction in the period of time it takes to certify software builds, which is pretty phenomenal,” he said. That achievement also stems from having a “commercially inspired software factory” for the B-21, he said. “Having a software development factory that captures that entire process and speeds up” the writing of code is paying dividends, Jones said.

The air and ground testbeds operate out of Northrop’s Melbourne, Fla., facilities, while the B-21 is assembled in Palmdale, Calif.

Jones also noted that the B-21 is being maintained by a combination of contractor and Air Force personnel and is confident Northrop will make good on its pledge to make the bomber a “daily flyer.”

The first B-21 test aircraft is heavily instrumented to capture test data, so engineers are getting “real time feedback” from each test, and the analysis of what was learned on each flight begins “while the aircraft is still in the air,” he said.

Jones demurred on a question of whether Northrop could speed up production of the B-21 or build more than planned. The program was structured to be a low-rate effort yielding only a handful of aircraft per year.

“Ultimately, it is up to the administration … to determine what the right number of bombers are,” he said. As the contractor, he said, “my responsibility to make sure that the Air Force has an option to help you make that decision.”

Providing those options means “we need to be performing on schedule. Check,” he said. Second, “we need to be performing on budget as well, and we need to be performing … in terms of our test program.” He said the B-21 is shaping up to be “most lethal weapon system in the world.”

Jones also said he believes the defense industrial base writ large is capable of scaling up production to the levels senior Air Force leaders have said are needed to credibly deter or fight a major war with a peer adversary. Northrop is recruiting from secondary schools and primary schools, to maintain its workforce and is having success, he said, turning people “with no skills” into valuable technicians in a few years.

WATCH: Space Superiority Take Center Stage at AFA Colorado

March 5, 2025 | By Tobias Naegele

AURORA, Colo.—Air & Space Forces Magazine sat down with Charles Galbreath, retired Space Force colonel and a senior fellow with the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, at the AFA Warfare Symposium to talk about Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Chance Saltzman’s message to Guardians and all things space happening at the conference.