This is the Best Time to Take Risks, Brown Says

June 22, 2022 | By John A. Tirpak

The Air Force is trying to strike a balance between fight-tonight readiness and future capabilities, and the current situation offers the most favorable conditions to focus more on investment, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. said in a think-tank presentation.

“This is probably the best opportunity” to accept some risk in day-to-day readiness versus long-term investment, Brown said in a Hudson Institute streamed event. He also commented on how Russia is prosecuting its air war in Ukraine by keeping its air units close to ground units and not venturing far from them.

The Air Force has to “balance risk over time,” Brown said, and trade off the needs of the service with those of combatant commanders, who are charged with developing here-and-now operational plans, Brown said.

“I don’t think the combatant commanders should take all the risk,” he said, nor should the services, which are trying to prepare for the future.

“If we had a rheostat where we could move things back and forth, you could see, this is probably the best opportunity to do this,” Brown said. He also said the services should not all be “in a bit of a valley” at the same time, with regard to readiness or investment.

“That’s why it’s important for the Joint Force to see ourselves” as a whole, he said.

Brown has previously argued for new metrics to assess readiness, and he did again, saying, “the way we measure readiness … is usually based on availability of platforms and trained Airmen … but if you continue to use it at this rate today, what’s it going to look like tomorrow? That part, I think we need to do a better job on.”

The services should constantly be asking themselves, “What do you need to be ready for?” he said.

“I just think we can do this better. We have data, we have tools … and models” that can better assess readiness, he said, “and do a little better job at forecasting, which will inform your decisions … and see what the future may look like.”

He argued for revamping the Global Force Management system, saying that when he was at U.S. Central Command, heavy use was made of carrier battle groups, but he was told that continuing to use them at that rate would result in shortages later.

“We don’t pay attention to things over time to see the readiness trends,” he said. “You may drive yourself into the valley … and wonder how you got here.”

Brown said he’s made a point to engage with members of Congress and their staffs on various Air Force initiatives, to explain what the service is thinking and doing, and why. Asked if he believes his “4+1” fighter plan will be allowed to proceed, Brown said, “I think it will.” The security situation is changing, calling for “increasing dialog,” he said, but he believes Capitol Hill is onboard.

“We’ve been pretty successful for the last two years” in getting Congress to go along with the Air Force’s plans, he said.

He said he has also impressed on all levels of the service the need to “be all on the same page in terms of our message” so that Congress gets a unified perspective from the service. He has told commanders to look beyond their “functional areas” and see things “across the enterprise … What’s best for the United States Air Force.” That was successful in the last National Defense Authorization Act, “and you’re seeing [that] … again in this round, this year.”

Brown declined to say whether he sees a greater emphasis on long-range strike, again saying he’s trying to find the “sweet spot … mix of capability and capacity.” Shorter-range assets such as fighters will be important for the “campaigning” aspect of the new National Defense Strategy, he said, as they provide an opportunity to work with partners and allies. Both long- and short-range platforms will have greater utility with longer-ranged weapons that are in development, he said.

The Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) will be crucial, though, “to not only get the information for almost all those targets” but passing that information on to “those long strike platforms or a shorter-range fighter.”

Finding that sweet spot entails constant wargaming and analysis, he said, and is subject to frequent change.

“Moving the levers back and forth” of investment in capability versus readiness will provide the best possible answer, but no plan is perfect, and no plan “survives contact” with an enemy, Brown allowed.

Brown was asked if the Air Force is doing any “lessons learned” analysis of Russia’s campaign in Ukraine, and he said that effort is ongoing.

“How we would do it,” Brown said, is to attack air defenses and establish air superiority over a broad area of operations where U.S. ground forces were operating.

“That’s not the way the Russians have operated,” though, he said. Russian forces have kept their air forces “more closely [to] where they had ground superiority. So, based on their doctrine, they’ve stuck … where their ground forces are, and don’t venture very far from them.”

The Ukrainians have been successful in denying air superiority to Russia in part by not keeping their air defenses “static,” Brown said.

“They stay fairly dynamic, which made it more difficult” for Russia to find and destroy Ukrainian air defense systems.

“If you can’t do dynamic targeting very well, you’re going to have a hard time,” he said. This is “something we do, I think, … really well. And something we’ll continue to work on.”

He also expressed surprise that Russia is having such a hard time countering Ukrainian air defenses, noting that they are Russian-made systems.

“They’re going against their own” system, he said. “They should know how to defeat them.”

Space Force Needs ‘Bodies’ at Pacific Commands to Meet Rising Threats

June 22, 2022 | By Abraham Mahshie

JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii—In past Pacific exercises, space capabilities came into the picture after the fact—supposition over what Air Force Space Command might have done had it been involved.

Since the creation of the Space Force, however, small teams of Guardians assigned to Pacific Air Forces and U.S. Indo-Pacific Command have been tasked with assuring that space effects are incorporated into all exercises, but some work is falling through the cracks.

Current Space Force leaders at PACAF say the small number of Guardians planning exercises and advising both INDOPACOM commander Adm. John C. Aquilino and PACAF commander Gen. Kenneth S. Wilsbach are not enough. What’s more, as allies and partners stand up their own space components, Space Force Guardians are needed to coordinate the joint force, allies, and partners to unite efforts against rising threats posed by China, Russia, and North Korea.

“We’re short-handed all over, but we look at our allies and partners” to supplement, said PACAF deputy director of space forces Space Force Lt. Col. Walt Priebe.

“Hopefully, here over the next couple of years, we’re going to grow in our manning to be able to handle the workload, because right now, with the small staffs we have out here between PACAF and INDOPACOM, [there is] just way more work than we can handle,” Priebe told Air Force Magazine during an interview at PACAF headquarters at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.

“Where does the work happen?” Priebe posed. “It happens down at the action officer level. So, by bringing in more Guardians, now we can get more folks down to those action officer levels for mission planning pieces, for strategy development—when it comes to exercises, getting space integrated more into each of the scenarios and events.”

The deputy director, who spent two decades with Air Force Space Command before becoming a Guardian in September 2021, said leadership has taken note. But before billets can be created and Guardians trained, decision memos need to be signed at the most senior levels of the Pentagon.

“Senior leadership in Space Force and [U.S. Space Command], they see it, they know it, and it’s just a matter of trying to get bodies,” he urged.

Leveraging Allies and Partners

The shortage of space operators at the Defense Department’s Pacific commands is also keeping the U.S. military from leveraging the power of regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand. All have launched space assets that can be shared in a way that better protects the global community from bad actors in space, and most have stood up their own space defense groups.

“All these things are huge movements forward into the greater community of supporting each other and bringing capabilities together to make everybody better off,” Priebe said.

“It’s very expensive and very complicated—there’s just too much out there,” he said of the space threat and components needed to respond. “So, being able to have our joint partners supporting us in these endeavors is very important.”

The Space Force now has over 8,000 Guardians and a budget proposal of $24.5 billion for fiscal year 2023, but China has invested heavily in space capabilities in recent years while the United States was preoccupied with the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. U.S. objectives in space are broad but limited by personnel and assets.

“That’s where we come in as the Space Force,” Priebe explained. “Our international engagements … try to help those other countries, support them as they grow, but also bring them into the fold so that we can all work together to cover the globe when it comes to space.”

The Space Force currently has about 200 Guardians on Oahu island advising the PACAF and INDOPACOM commanders on key space capabilities and working to integrate space into exercises. The Guardians’ duties include planning, communications, and intelligence.

“We make sure space is getting integrated into the exercises,” Priebe explained. “In the past, there was a lot of hand waving just because people didn’t know how to either request the support or what the effect would look like. So, they just kind of said, ‘Well, we would have done this.’ And something that we’ve been striving [for] over the last decade is changing that.”

The increased tasking has demonstrated a need for more Guardians in the theater so that PACAF and INDOPACOM can conduct joint exercises that leverage the Space Force and the space capabilities of the other services.

In recent weeks, Space Force Lt. Gen. B. Chance Saltzman, deputy chief for operations, cyber, and nuclear, has said that the Defense Secretary is nearing a decision that would create a Space Force component command at U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, a move that would strengthen space integration across the services operating in theater.

“The biggest thing with that is just there’s going to be such a larger footprint of Guardians on island than we currently have,” Priebe said.

The establishment of the service component and an estimated 50 additional billets will allow the Space Force to adapt new policies, procedures, and ways of doing things “at the speed that space happens.”

“When you’re fighting in a space war, you don’t have days or a day to readjust, you’ve got hours, maybe minutes to readjust things,” Priebe said.

Priebe has already noticed that the Space Force’s flat structure is streamlining decision-making. While the Air Force must go from squadron to group to wing to reach a decision-maker, the Space Force structure moves from delta to field command to Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond.

“The speed at which we can have communication, make things happen, is absolutely wonderful,” Priebe said. “We’re just really waiting on the bodies to get here to be able to support better.”

While Priebe focused on the required growth in Guardians at PACAF and INDOPACOM in Hawaii, he said having Guardians with detachments at key ally locations such as Australia, South Korea, and Japan would demonstrate U.S. commitment to growing and better integrating with those partner forces. Presently, three Guardians are in South Korea and one is in Japan supporting U.S. commanders. Their primary responsibility is not a security cooperation job, which is designed to work closely with a partner nation.

“So, we put a heavy ask on them to kind of step outside their lane and go do these things for us,” Priebe admitted.

Deterring China in Space

China and adversaries have “taken notice” of the creation of the Space Force and the stand up of allies’ space components, Priebe contended.

“By having people there on the ground, we understand what our allies are going through. We can see what’s happening to them,” he said. “Or, more importantly, here’s what our allies are bringing, and we can feed that into our larger Space Force.”

China has demonstrated and wants to be a pacing country for space launch, Priebe explained. Likewise, China maintains a space station that has rotated two crews and received five resupply modules.

“It’s showing China that they can’t just steamroll over other countries,” he said. “It’s showing them that it’s not just one competitor they’re going against anymore. It’s globally.”

With the F-22’s Future Uncertain, Hickam Airmen Reflect

June 22, 2022 | By Abraham Mahshie

JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii—Just behind the F-22 maintenance shop at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, a tall chain-link fence blocks access to a lengthy roadway leading to 13 sunshades, each standing more than 30 feet high.

Their corrugated metal roofs protect both maintainers and the F-22 fighter aircraft flown by the Hawaii Air National Guard’s 199th Fighter Squadron and the Air Force’s 19th Fighter Squadron.

For a dozen years, thousands of Hawaiian maintainers have supported, and hundreds of pilots have flown, the fifth-generation aircraft from Hickam’s strategic Pacific location. But in recent months, a tinge of sadness and uncertainty has radiated through the F-22 support team and pilots as Air Force leaders called for the retirement of 33 of the 186 F-22s in the fleet to make way for investments in next-generation fighters.

None of Hickam’s F-22s, which represent 20 percent of the combat-capable platforms, would be affected, but the signal from Air Force leaders is clear to all those at this proud place: The F-22 will eventually be phased out.

“There’s nothing that compares to it,” said Hawaii Air National Guard Master Sgt. Ryan Morita, superintendent for the power support systems of the 154th Maintenance Squadron that supports the F-22.

Commander of Hickam’s 19th Fighter Squadron Lt. Col. Paul Lopez referenced the poem “High Flight” by John Gillespie when describing the experience of flying an F-22. Staff photo by Abraham Mahshie.

“Look at it—it just looks like it’s bowed up. It’s ready to go,” Morita said with a hard laugh during a recent Air Force Magazine visit to Hickam. Morita has served in the Guard for 31 years and supported the F-22 ever since it arrived July 1, 2010.

Arguments that defense dollars should be set aside for newer generation F-35s did not phase the Hawaii native as he made the long walk from the workshop to the sunshades, his smile beaming ear to ear the whole way.

“But, this is the faster one, and this is the better one. This is the more agile, and it’s a more powerful one. This, this is the dominant one,” he said, pointing to the F-22’s two engines, compared to the F-35’s one, and the F-22’s larger weapon-carrying capacity. “It’s sad.”

More than $4.1 billion is set aside to upgrade the remaining F-22s over the next five years according to the fiscal year 2023 defense budget now before Congress. In recent weeks, first the Senate, then the House pushed back on Air Force plans to reduce the F-22 fleet.

On June 16, the Senate Armed Services Committee passed a version of the National Defense Authorization Act that ruled out retiring the 33 oldest F-22s, which are used for training, and which the Air Force deems too expensive to maintain. On June 20, the chair of the House Armed Services Committee followed suit, releasing a markup for debate that goes further, calling for the full fleet to remain and the older jets to be upgraded at a cost of $1 billion.

The 19th Fighter Squadron in the Pacific

Commander of Hickam’s 19th Fighter Squadron Lt. Col. Paul Lopez, who has flown the F-22 since 2011, told Air Force Magazine that the platform is highly maneuverable and optimized for air-to-air combat.

Each week, he lifts off from Hickam Field on the southwest corner of Oahu island and flies to training areas either north or south to rehearse aircraft handling characteristics and confidence maneuvers such as the cobra, the pedal turn, or a high angle of attack loop.

Hickam pilots borrow the surfing term “Hang 10” to describe the initial maneuver for all three moves, a full 90-degree heavenward nose climb. In the pedal turn, the aircraft executes a minimum radius turn, or making a turn in the smallest possible ground area. In the high angle of attack loop, the aircraft rises, flips upside down, and loops back, all in less than a quarter of a mile. In the cobra maneuver, the aircraft abruptly climbs then levels off, the maneuver forming the shape of a poised king cobra.

“It’s almost like you put on the brakes and they’ll fly right by,” said Lopez of the cobra move. The squadron commander from Virginia Beach, Va., flew the F-22 at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va., before arriving to Hickam in 2021.

Practicing the maneuvers in Hawaii’s awe-inspiring beauty has been a spiritual experience for Lopez.

“It’s just like that poem, ‘High Flight’ by John Gillespie, where it’s like anytime he flies, like, you’re touching the face of God,” Lopez said, referring to the World War II-era Canadian aviator and poet.

The squadron commander also praised the maintainers who keep the F-22 safely flying.

“They’re out there sacrificing their blood, sweat, sometimes their tears, and their time just to get that pilot in the jet,” he said.

“When it all comes to fruition, when you pull back on the stick at rotate speed, you leave mother Earth, you see the ground getting smaller as you’re going up in the sky, you raise the landing gear handle, the doors close, and now you’re looking at Diamond Head [crater], at Waikiki [beach]. Do a right hand turn out on the departure, now you’re looking down on Ala Moana [beach], you’re looking essentially inside Diamond Head, and on a clear day, you can see Moloka’i, the Big Island of Hawaii, with [volcanoes] Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea, and West Maui, like, ‘Man, this is the best job in the world,’” he said. “It’s humbling, one, to wear the uniform, but then to also do it in this capacity of flying the aircraft, and just to be having that be my role on the team.”

Lopez was more contemplative when asked about the proposed retiring of 33 Raptors.

Before answering, he allowed a lengthy pause and looked down, his arms akimbo.

“My first thought was that thank God we have more Raptors to fly,” he said, jokingly.

“I would say that, you know, that decision is being made based on strategic vision that leadership has,” he added, because “… with anything in any organization, in order to advance the agenda, the vision, … sometimes a divestment needs to happen in order to create space for something else.”

The Air Force has not specified the exact upgrades that would be realized for the remaining F-22 fleet. However, indications are that the investment would go to upgraded sensors, electronic warfare, stealth coatings, and improved connectivity with F-35s, other aircraft, and satellites.

Pacific Air Forces Commander Gen. Kenneth S. Wilsbach said the proposed divestment would not impact his fleet, but he declined to address the overall decision.

“No, it doesn’t really hurt us,” Wilsbach told Air Force Magazine during a June 9 interview at his PACAF headquarters office.

Wilsbach regularly flies the F-22 himself and maintains the first flight suit locker visible upon entering the squadron locker room.

“It can maneuver, and it’s extremely fast, and has got fantastic stealth capability,” he said, describing the platform. “It has the capability of going toe to toe with anybody, same thing with the F-35.”

Lopez, meanwhile, hopes to one day achieve his F-22 dream.

“I’m still trying to find that perfect sortie,” he said.

“I want to have a flight so perfect, where I don’t make any mistakes,” he described. “The radio calls are pristine. I’m on altitude. I’m on airspeed. I’m in formation. I’m talking to the right radio, executing the tactics the way they’re designed to be executed, and I’m flying the jet to the best of my ability.”

Space Force Lacks a ‘Credible’ Five-Year Budget, Congressional Report Says

June 21, 2022 | By Greg Hadley

The Space Force is running the risk of starting more programs than it can afford, at least according to its five-year budget plan that isn’t “credible,” according to a key congressional panel.

The House Appropriations defense subcommittee offered that stark warning as part of the report it submitted alongside its 2023 appropriations bill, which will be considered by the full committee June 22.

Looking to address those financial concerns, House appropriators included a provision in their bill that would require the Secretary of the Air Force, through the assistant secretary for space acquisition and integration, to conduct a risk assessment analysis of the “projected cost, affordability, and executability” of the entire Space Force portfolio of programs and activities and to present the results to lawmakers by Oct. 1.

The bill would also trim the Space Force budget request for military personnel; operations and maintenance; and research, development, testing, and evaluation, with the biggest difference being to the RDT&E budget—nearly $358 million less than what the service asked for.

Such changes would modestly change the overall top line of $24.5 billion in the 2023 Space Force budget request—that total was a substantial $6.5 billion increase over the $18 billion enacted by Congress for fiscal 2022. House appropriators noted that a chunk of that increase is a result of the Space Development Agency integrating into the service as well as more inter-service troop transfers. Still, even after adjusting for those changes, the committee report pegged the growth at roughly 20 percent.

Another increase is projected for fiscal 2024, according to the Pentagon’s Future Years Defense Program, which projects spending five years in advance. After that, however, the top line is projected to decrease—and lawmakers are concerned.

“The Space Force’s ambitious plans for new architectures, programs, and mission areas, do not appear to be backed up with credible budget projections in the outyears to actually deliver these capabilities,” the HAC-D committee report states.

With smaller budgets supposedly coming, the Space Force may be overextending itself, the report adds.

“The Committee cautions the Space Force against starting more programs than it can afford,” the report says. “The lack of a credible five-year budget raises fundamental questions about whether any serious analysis or long-term planning has been done to assess the realism and affordability of the entire portfolio of programs—not just individual programs—or to set priorities among programs, including deciding not to start programs if they are not affordable within projected budgets.”

The chair of the defense subcommittee, Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.), questioned Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall on this topic when he appeared before lawmakers in May. Kendall indicated that he thought the FYDP would wind up changing over time, saying he did not believe future budgets “will remain flat or go down for the Space Force—quite the opposite.”

But Kendall’s answers were seemingly not enough to satisfy lawmakers’ concerns, with the report stating that the Space Force’s budget fails to meet the committee’s expectation that its “plans and programs must be based on rigorous technical analysis matched with executable plans resourced by realistic budgets.”

In particular, the committee report takes aim at the Space Force’s plans to significantly boost spending on its missile warning enterprise.

All told, the service wants more than $4.5 billion for missile warning in 2023, including billions of dollars for Next-Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared geosynchronous satellites, hundreds of millions of dollars for the Tracking Layer of SDA’s National Defense Space Architecture in low Earth orbit, and more than a billion dollars for a “Resilient Missile Warning/Missile Tracking” program.

While applauding the Space Force for trying to build a more resilient architecture spread across different orbits, the committee report warned that the service “has not provided sufficient information on the expected life-cycle cost of the new architecture, the cost to recapitalize a proliferated architecture every 3–5 years, potential risks and challenges in the supply chain, the ability of the Space Force to scale up capabilities to command and control a much larger number of satellites, the applicability and ability to meet stringent requirements for missile warning certification, cybersecurity, and resilience against reversible and irreversible kinetic and non-kinetic attacks.”

Looking to address that, the committee is asking for a life-cycle cost estimate for the proposed Resilient Missile Warning/Missile Tracking program by January 2023, as well as quarterly updates on that program and Next-Gen OPIR.

USAF Doesn’t Expect New Aggressor F-35s’ Camo to Interfere With Stealth

June 21, 2022 | By John A. Tirpak

Editor’s note: This story was updated at 6:59 p.m. Eastern time June 21 with additional information from the Air Force.

The new “Splinter” camouflage on aggressor F-35s at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., shouldn’t negate or interfere with their low observability, meaning they can truly play the role of a stealthy sparring partner for USAF fighters, according to a Nellis spokesperson.

The first two F-35s to appear in camouflage were revealed June 9 at a Nellis ceremony to reactivate the 65th Aggressor Squadron, wearing a paint scheme reminiscent of both the Russian Su-57 Felon and Chinese J-20 fighters.

“Nellis maintenance personnel applied alternate paint to create the unique camouflage scheme after coordination with the F-35 Joint Program Office,” the Nellis spokesperson said in an emailed response to a query.

“While the application of the alternate paint is a first, we do not anticipate it will have any adverse impacts on the F-35’s low-observable properties,” the spokesperson said. “The alternate paint can be removed at any time to return our aircraft to the original configuration.”

However, he later added, “Further testing will be required to discern if there is a difference in the
low-observable properties. A standard Air Force aircraft paint was used for
the paint scheme, and [Lockheed Martin] engineers approved the use and process
of paint application.”

F-35 aggressors — Lt. Col. Brandon Nauta, new commander of the 65th Aggressor Squadron at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., speaks at the reactivation of the unit June 9, 2022. Pictured at left of the F-35’s vertical tail is a radar cross section enhancement device used to prevent adversaries from assessing the F-35’s true stealthiness in normal training operations. Air Force photo.

A Lockheed Martin spokesperson said the company was “not involved in selecting or applying the paint.”

Since the first F-35s began coming off the production line, with the exception of national insignia, all F-35 aircraft have had the same finish, although a production line change from a few years ago replaced the light-gray raised material over some panel lines with material of a darker color. Lockheed Martin has explained that the gray-on-gray finish results from the special materials, paint, and coatings required to achieve a low-observable effect. Some of these coatings have a dull, flat appearance, while others are somewhat more glossy. The finish around panel lines is different, for example, from finishes on dielectric surfaces, such as the radome and leading edges. Under certain lighting conditions and from some angles, the underlying silver metallic sheen of the F-35 shines through.

However, the camouflage on the 65th’s aggressor F-35s is limited and does not cover the entire aircraft. No camouflage has been applied to the underside of the jets.

The exact function of the F-35’s paint and coatings is classified but is known to help reflect radar energy from some directions while absorbing, attenuating, or altering it in others, to reduce the aircraft’s radar return. The dull gray color also makes the F-35 harder to see at night.

The F-22—also a fifth-generation stealth fighter—has a different camouflage, which sources have said plays a role in confusing adversary imaging infrared systems. The application of the darker F-22 camouflage shapes, known within Lockheed Martin as “the amoebas,” is an extremely precise process requiring robots to ensure that the paint has no high or low spots that would affect the aircraft’s radar reflectivity.

Unexplained is why, in some air-to-air images, one of the aggressor F-35s is fitted with radar reflection enhancers, positioned on the fuselage near the trailing edge of the wings, and the other is not.

The 65th has used F-5s, F-16s, and F-15s to simulate adversary aircraft in the past but was disbanded in 2014 due to financial restrictions imposed by the Budget Control Act. In 2019, the Air Force said it was planning to reactivate the unit and that it would have some F-35s.

The two F-35s painted in the new scheme are of an older batch and will not be upgraded to the Block 4 configuration, an Air Force official said. Their degree of stealth makes them a good stand-in for China’s J-20 or FC-31, he said.

The Air Force has also recently changed course regarding the use of commercial aggressor platforms. Several companies have been fulfilling ADAIR (short for “adversary air”) contracts for the Air Force, but the service recently decided that third- and fourth-generation types such as the Mirage F-1 and even F-16s are no longer sufficient for Air Force pilots to train against.

“What we’re finding, now … is these contracts aren’t very effective at Nellis at the high-end training”, said Lt. Gen. David S. Nahom, deputy chief of staff for plans and programs, in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on May 17. The older aircraft “are not providing us what we need,” he said, and USAF doesn’t plan to renew all such contracts when they expire.

China, Nahom said, has “stepped up” the capability of its combat air forces, so “we have to step up our replication” at the two “high end” threat-simulation exercises that run at Nellis and the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex in Alaska. The contract ADAIR companies may continue work at fighter training units, where they are “very effective,” he said.

Aggressor pilots study and employ the tactics used by potential adversaries, with the goal of giving USAF fighter pilots multiple experiences at realistic air combat before the students ever go into actual battles. The “Red Baron” studies of the 1970s determined that the survival rate of fighter and attack pilots went up dramatically after 10 missions, and the aggressor program was intended to give pilots those 10 missions in a safe but stressful environment. USAF fighter pilots have reported that real-world combat has been less taxing than the tough encounters they had at Red Flag and other high-end, live-fly wargames.

Nahom also said USAF is stepping up its investment in live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) exercises because it can’t reveal all its fifth-generation tactics in an open-air, live-fly setting.

Space Force Set to Establish New Delta to Run Intel Hub

June 21, 2022 | By Greg Hadley

The Space Force will stand up its newest delta with the formation of Space Delta 18, which will operate the National Space Intelligence Center.

The new organization will be tasked with helping the Space Force to identify and track threats in orbit, both kinetic and non-kinetic. It will be formally established June 24 at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

The new center’s formation date was made public in a social media post by its new deputy director, John Gass, who will serve as No. 2 for director Col. Marqus Randall. A Space Force spokesperson confirmed the details to Air Force Magazine.

The formation of the NSIC has been a part of the Space Force’s plan for some time. Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond released a planning document in November 2020 calling for it to work in concert with the rest of the service’s intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance enterprise to grow “space intelligence at foundational, tactical, operational, and strategic levels.”

The Space Analysis Squadron and Counter-Space Analysis Squadron of the National Air and Space Intelligence Center, the Air Force’s own intelligence hub, will form the basis of the National Space Intelligence Center.

In January 2021, the Space Force officially became the 18th member of the U.S. Intelligence Community, a move that Raymond later said allowed the service to “really begin to work on this thing called the National Space Intelligence Center.”

In April 2021, the Space Force’s director of ISR, Maj. Gen. Leah Lauderback, told Signal Magazine that the intelligence center would include roughly 350 personnel, with a goal of reaching initial operating capability by January 2022. Lauderback later confirmed that the plan was to co-locate the center alongside the NASIC at Wright-Patterson.

Gass made reference to the delay in the center’s establishment in his social media post, describing years of “trials and tribulations.” He also shared the unit’s emblem, which seemingly pays tribute to the National Air and Space Intelligence Center’s emblem that prominently features a Sphinx.

Space Delta 18 will become the Space Force’s second ISR-focused Delta, joining Space Delta 7, headquartered at Peterson Space Force Base, Colo.

Wilsbach: Army Must ‘Step Up’ to Protect Guam, Pacific Air Bases Against New Threats

June 21, 2022 | By Abraham Mahshie

JOINT REGION MARIANAS HEADQUARTERS, Guam—New missile threats from China coupled with the strategic importance of Guam are heightening the urgency for new defensive systems to protect the island, said Gen. Kenneth S. Wilsbach, commander of Pacific Air Forces.

Guam is just a speck in the vast Pacific Ocean, 30 miles long by 12 miles at its widest point, but its location in Micronesia in the South Pacific makes Andersen Air Force Base a crucial hub for fighter and bomber aircraft. The Army’s base defense mission is, therefore, paramount to protecting it as a forward position for re-arming and repairing strike aircraft.

Joint Region Marianas commander Navy Rear Adm. Benjamin Nicholson said “the potential for a Guam defense system” is now the big news on the island. Such a defense would answer the call by commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Adm. John C. Aquilino for 360-degree radar and missile defenses to protect the island from ballistic, cruise, and hypersonic missile threats.

Today, the base depends on the Army’s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system, which has been in Guam since 2014, when it was deployed in response to North Korean threats.

The THAAD battery “gives us protection from ballistic missiles, and some of the other missiles as well, but it is somewhat limited in scope,” Nicholson said. “The new system will provide a more comprehensive ability to defend the island from all threat axes and a larger group of missiles. That’s in the works. There’s still a lot of work to be done on where those parts and pieces will go.”

360-Degree Defense

Guam is shaped like a tilted hourglass with high plateaus in the north and a mountain range in the south. The Department of Defense controls 27 percent of the island, but most of that property is in the flatter northern plateau, including Andersen and Marine Corps Camp Blaz. It has very little land in the mountainous south or east of Naval Base Guam.

U.S. national defense competes as a priority with tourism and environmental concerns. That means missile systems will most likely “have to be in multiple different locations throughout the island to provide the proper radar coverage, the proper interceptor coverage,” Nicholson said.

U.S. Army Maj. Kyle J. Hermanson, Task Force Talon commander here, said “THAAD is the most capable surface-to-air missile system the Army has ever fielded” against theater ballistic missile threats. “Unlike Patriot … THAAD defends a large area and not just a specific asset, such as an airfield. THAAD is the cornerstone for the defense of Guam mission.”

In 2021, the Army tested the Iron Dome missile defense system on Guam, but its high humidity proved a challenge. Now the Missile Defense Agency is proposing a multi-layer defense system, seeking $539 million in fiscal 2023 to begin building a multi-layer defense system for Guam that could be fielded by 2026. For now, Nicholson said the Army is modifying how THAAD is used to provide better defense.

“The Army … is always incorporating and fielding new capabilities in order to create additional problems for our adversaries,” Hermanson said.

In March, a THAAD unit deployed to Rota, a nearby island, to test remote launch capability. Hermanson said the test proved the Army could use the system to better protect Air Force units during agile combat employment events, in which small numbers of aircraft operate from dispersed and often austere locations, such as small Pacific islands, rather than large concentrated bases.

Guam defense — Signal Soldiers from 307th Expeditionary Signal Battalion-Enhanced set up a satellite terminal to enable communications between the remote launcher and Tactical Fire Control Center. Army photo.

New Defenses Not Coming ‘Soon Enough’

Still, PACAF commander Wilsbach said the Army needs to “step up” development of missile defenses. “When you start getting out to some of these island locations … nations, they obviously don’t have defenses,” he said in an interview at PACAF’s headquarters at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. Defending U.S. bases “is a U.S. Army mission set.”

Wilsbach said allies play an important role in base defense in Japan and Korea, along with the Army’s THAAD and Patriot missile systems. Similarly, the Navy shares in the defense of Guam with Aegis-equipped ships. The Air Force is responsible for defending against air threats, including cruise missiles.

“I’m really counting on the Army to step up and advance their capabilities to get after some of the newer threats we’re seeing,” such as hypersonic and maneuvering reentry vehicles and new stealthy cruise missiles, Wilsbach said. “These are all tough targets to hit.”

“They are working on it,” he said. “I can’t get it soon enough. So, I need them to push it up—hurry up and field those capabilities for them and for us.”

Former Test Pilot, Astronaut Candidate Selected to Sculpt Chappie James Memorial

June 21, 2022 | By Greg Hadley

This story was originally published Sept. 17, 2021.

One trailblazer will commemorate another as former Air Force test pilot, astronaut candidate, and sculptor Ed Dwight has been selected to create a statue of the Air Force’s first Black four-star general, Gen. Daniel “Chappie” James Jr.

The statue will be installed at the landing of the new bridge in Pensacola, Fla., that was named in James’ honor in July 2020, the General Daniel “Chappie” James, Jr. Memorial Foundation announced Sept. 17. It will form part of a memorial plaza that will include an F-4 Phantom in flight and an 80-foot flag pole, with a scheduled dedication of Sept. 18, 2022, the 75th birthday of the Air Force.

The city of Pensacola has already agreed to contribute $250,000 in funds for the project, and further fundraising efforts will begin in October, the memorial foundation said in a press release. Pensacola, less than 50 miles from Eglin Air Force Base, is James’ hometown—his childhood home is being transformed into a museum and is currently under construction.

James, a Tuskegee Airman, served in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam, seeing combat in the latter two conflicts. He was promoted to the rank of four-star general in 1975, becoming the first African American to reach the grade of O-10 across the entire U.S. military. He was placed in charge of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, becoming the eighth-ever commander of NORAD, and held that position for more than two years.

Dwight, for his part, is a trailblazer as well. As a captain and a test pilot at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., in the 1960s, he trained in the Aerospace Research Pilot School run by the legendary Chuck Yeager, with the hope of being selected as a NASA astronaut, according to Smithsonian Magazine.

Dwight was part of a select group to make it through to the second phase of training and was recommended by the Air Force when he applied to become an astronaut, but he was controversially not selected.

After leaving the Air Force, Dwight embarked on a second career as an artist and has sculpted dozens of memorials and statues on display throughout the country. In particular, he has sculpted Black trailblazers such as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, Jesse Owens, and George Washington Carver, among others.

House Moves to Upgrade, Not Retire, Oldest F-22s

June 20, 2022 | By Greg Hadley

The Air Force’s plans to divest its oldest 33 F-22 Raptor fighters met with a sharp rebuke from the House Armed Services Committee, which moved instead to mandate the Air Force maintain the full Raptor fleet and upgrade the older planes to the newest configuration in its version of the 2023 National Defense Authorization bill.

USAF sought to retire the early F-22s, currently rated for training use only because they are expensive to maintain and are increasingly mismatched to the combat-coded versions, reducing their value as training platforms. The roughly $1 billion cost to upgrade those jets was not affordable, Air Force officials said.

But the HASC chairman’s mark, released June 20, would not only block plans to retire the aircraft, but would also direct the service to upgrade all its F-22s to at least “Block 30/35 mission systems, sensors, and weapon employment capabilities.”

The House committee draft goes further than what the Senate Armed Services Committee included in its version of the NDAA, calling in that bill for no F-22 retirements without “a detailed written plan for training F-22 aircrew while avoiding any degradation in readiness or reduction in combat capability.”

In a background briefing, a HASC staff member told reporters last week that ensuring every F-22 in the inventory is combat capable is the bipartisan, consensus view of the committee. A second staff member called preserving the jets “risk mitigation.”

“When we let the Air Force curtail the program back in 2010 at 187 airplanes at the time, they told us that the training capacity would always be available to meet contingency requirements, if and when needed, along with the 234 F-15Cs,” the staff member said. “Now that the Air Force is retiring all their F-15Cs, they’ve cut the buy in half for F-15EX, [the Next Generation Air Dominance program] has slid further to the right than what they originally told us, and now they want to reduce their F-22 capacity. We think there’s significant risk in meeting future air superiority requirements. And so we’re holding the Air Force accountable to their commitment to have the training-coded jets combat capable.”

The bill includes exceptions allowing the Secretary of the Air Force to retire F-22s and go below the minimum of 186 fighters if any given aircraft is deemed “no longer mission capable and uneconomical to repair,” such as after an accident.

The Air & Space Forces Association praised the move in a statement, noting that building fighter capacity is a priority for building up effective combat air power. “AFA is gratified that lawmakers see the need to protect these world’s greatest fighter jets from being retired prematurely,” the statement said. “The Air & Space Forces Association could not agree more that modernizing them to the most advanced configurations is one of the most cost-effective means of rapidly adding to USAF combat capability.”

The House committee will meet on June 22 to mark up its version of the NDAA. Once the measures clear their respective committees, they must be approved by the full chambers, and then reconciled in a conference committee.

AWACS

House lawmakers also challenged Air Force plan to retire 15 E-3 AWACS Sentries, roughly half the fleet. The committee’s bill allow just 10 E-3s to be retired until the Air Force reports back on its future airborne warning and control plans, and on developing air moving target indication, battle management, and command and control capabilities; the impact of retiring 15 AWACS planes; and a detailed comparison between the E-3s and the Air Force’s planned replacement, the E-7 Wedgetail.

A-10

The House Armed Services Committee markup accepted Air Force plans to start cutting its A-10 “Warthog” fleet, and took the additional step of reducing the minimum number of A-10s the Air Fore must maintain from 171 to 153. That move appears to support the service’s plans to replace 21 Indiana Air National Guard A-10s with F-16s. Congress has long protected the beloved close air support Warthogs from any plan to retire the jets, but this year both House and Senate committees appear poised to allow some retirements, a major victory for Air Force leaders who note that the Warthog is ill-suited to missions against sophisticated enemies.