Air Force and Boeing Delay T-7A, Citing Escape System Problem

Air Force and Boeing Delay T-7A, Citing Escape System Problem

Problems with the ejection seats in the Air Force’s new T-7A trainer jet are forcing the Air Force and its contractor, Boeing, to delay production deliveries until the second half of 2024. 

Industry and Air Force officials have frequently lauded the Red Hawk for the use of digital design and engineering that allowed it to go from drawing board to first flight in 36 months, but the aircraft has encountered several setbacks in recent years that have pushed back the trainer’s initial, ambitious timeline. 

This most recent hitch has been related to the jet’s “flight control software and the escape system,” an Air Force spokeswoman confirmed to Air & Space Forces Magazine. Air Force Times first reported on the issue. 

“All flight control software issues to date have been resolved and will be tested in flight in the first quarter of 2023,” Air Force spokeswoman Maj. Alexandra Stormer said. “The Air Force is working to correct some escape system deficiencies found during initial testing in late 2021 and will resume escape system testing in the first quarter of 2023.” 

The Air Force previously announced in October 2021 that it had started testing on the T-7’s ejection system, stating in a press release that it was using “the largest-class and smallest-class manikins” in tests given the broad range of body types the jet is being designed for. 

A 2020 report from McClatchy pointed out that the Air Force previously designed aircraft based on the average measurements of pilots, in turn based on studies from the 1960s and 70s. That led to many women being automatically disqualified as pilots due to their size. 

The T-7A is intended to be more accommodating of different body sizes, encompassing all pilots that can meet Air Force standards, which have been modified in recent years. 

T-7A
A manikin ejects from a Boeing T-7A Red Hawk in June during ongoing qualification tests of the ejection system for the T-7A at the Holloman High Speed Test Track (HHSTT) at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico. U.S. Air Force photo

Ensuring the ejection system works for all those body types, however, has been a challenge. In its 2021 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, the Government Accountability Office flagged qualification of the ejection system as one of two primary risks to the program’s schedule, and in the 2022 version of the report, the GAO once again noted the issue as a “top program risk.” 

“If the program experiences delays in qualifying the emergency escape system, there is increased risk of delay to the November 2023 production decision,” the report states. 

The Air Force is still aiming for that production decision, also called Milestone C, in November 2023, with a low-rate initial production contract coming a month later in December, Stormer told Air & Space Forces Magazine. But the actual delivery of production T-7s is now scheduled for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024—ending Sept. 30, 2024.

That represents at least a year delay from the Air Force’s very earliest timelines for the program, but there have been other issues that have slowed the schedule as well. In 2021, the Air Force announced it had discovered an issue with “aircraft wing rock” in testing, meaning the T-7A could be unstable in the roll axis when flying at high angles of attack. That issue has subsequently been fixed, but supply chain issues have also created delays. 

As a result, Boeing is now “working with the Air Force to re-baseline the schedule, including identifying opportunities to recover schedule after continued COVID-19 supply chain and workforce disruptions,” Boeing spokeswoman Mary Ann Brett told Air & Space Forces Magazine. “That said, the program is accomplishing new milestones as the pathfinder program for a digitally designed, built and tested system. … Boeing plans to complete all supporting activities by [the third quarter of] 2024.” 

The third quarter of calendar year 2024 coincides with the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, matching up the Air Force and Boeing’s timelines. 

Boeing acknowledged issues with “pre-flight testing and hardware qualification, but have a good path to resolution in place to work through these,” Brett added. 

And despite the delays in the program, both the Air Force and Boeing remained firm that they will continue to use the digital design and simulation process that built the T-7 for other programs moving forward. 

“Working from our digital design, build and test programs for the T-7A Red Hawk, we went from firm concept to first flight on our two production-relevant jets in just 36 months,” Brett said. “Following this digital path has enabled us to make early discovery of anomalies, in some cases, years before the first aircrew ever step into the advanced trainer.” 

“We are committed to continuing use of digital design on our future programs using model-based systems engineering and 3D design tools,” Stormer added.

Boeing officially rolled out the production version of the T-7A this past April, but while the service waits for the new jet, it continues to rely on the aging T-38 Talon to train its future fighter pilots. The T-38 has had a string of mishaps lately, including two last month and 10 Class A or B mishaps in the previous four years. 

New Commander Pledges to ‘Stay the Course on Transforming’ AFSOC

New Commander Pledges to ‘Stay the Course on Transforming’ AFSOC

Lt. Gen. Tony Bauernfeind took charge of Air Force Special Operations Command on Dec. 9, succeeding Lt. Gen. James C. “Jim” Slife and pledging to “stay the course on transforming this great command.” 

Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. presided over the change of command ceremony at Hurlburt Field, Fla., alongside U.S. Special Operations Command boss Army Gen. Bryan P. Fenton. 

Bauernfeind takes over AFSOC after more than three decades in uniform, including command of SOF units at the squadron, group, and wing levels. He also led Special Operations Command Korea and has been both Chief of Staff and Vice Commander at SOCOM. 

Now, in his first-ever AFSOC headquarters assignment, he must continue a transformation from the counter-terrorism mission of the past two decades to one more focused on strategic competition. It’s a delicate balancing act. 

“Our focus will be unwavering—continue to accelerate and transform the command to win today’s fight and meet tomorrow’s challenges,” Bauernfeind said. “This will require us to return to our roots of irregular warfare, as we consider the force development and force design of Air Force special operations on tomorrow’s battlefields. We will leverage our decades or hard-earned combat experience to play a vital role in the department’s integrated deterrence efforts … Additionally, we will continue to succeed in the counterterrorist fight, while ensuring we’re always ready to execute our no-fail crisis response mission on a moment’s notice.” 

Slife, who will become USAF’s deputy chief of staff for operations, had begun that transition during his tenure, citing the new Air Force Force Generation model (AFFORGEN) as a critical means for better understanding risk calculations related to the commitment of forces. He also said he was on a personal “jihad” against centralization of resources, noting that efficiencies gained could also mask shortages of resources that could prove devastating in wartime. 

Slife handed off command noting the continuity embodied by such moves. “My 1,260th in command of AFSOC and your first day in command of AFSOC will share a date on our calendars,” Slife told Bauernfeind during the ceremony. “ … I see the journey behind, you see the journey ahead, and that is exactly the way it should be.” 

For his part, Bauernfeind laid out basic goals for his tenure. 

“My job is clear. In partnership with [Command Chief Master Sergeant of AFSOC CMSgt. Cory M. Olson], I will provide you with a vision, and I will fight for the resources you need to execute that vision,” Bauernfeind said. “I will champion efforts that sustain and improve your quality of service and you and and your family’s quality of life. And finally, I will tackle those barriers inhibiting your successes so that each and every one of you can grow to the maximum of your personal potential. … My message to you is this: We have important work ahead of us, and we will stay the course on transforming this great command.” 

The AFSOC change of command was the second in three days among Air Force major commands, following the elevation of Gen. Thomas A. Bussiere to lead Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) on Dec. 7. In all, six Air Force major commands saw new leaders in 2022, the most in a single year in at least a decade. 

New Air Force MAJCOM Commanders in 2022 

  • Lt. Gen. Brian S. Robinson: Air Education and Training Command 
  • Gen. James B. Hecker: U.S. Air Forces in Europe/Air Forces Africa 
  • Gen. Duke Z. Richardson: Air Force Materiel Command 
  • Lt. Gen. John P. Healy: Air Force Reserve Command 
  • Gen. Thomas A. Bussiere: Air Force Global Strike Command 
  • Lt. Gen. Tony Bauernfeind: Air Force Special Operations Command 
Pratt Says F135 Upgrade for F-35 Would Save $40 Billion over New Adaptive Engines

Pratt Says F135 Upgrade for F-35 Would Save $40 Billion over New Adaptive Engines

The Pentagon could save $40 billion by skipping a total replacement of the F-35A fighter’s F135 engine with new adaptive engines, and should instead opt for a more modest and affordable upgrade that could equip the fleet more quickly, Pratt & Whitney officials argued Dec. 13 in a briefing with reporters.

“We believe the core upgrade will provide $40 billion in savings” across the future F-35 program, Pratt F135 Vice President Jen Latka said.

The company arrived at that figure by totaling all possible costs, from development of the new engine to a new, parallel production and sustainment enterprise, new parts, tools, maintenance equipment, and higher production unit costs due to a heavier powerplant.

Pratt’s preferred solution is the Engine Core Upgrade, or ECU—previously known as the Enhanced Engine Package, or EEP—which Latka said would cost $2.4 billion to fully develop, versus $6.7 billion to develop a variant of new adaptive engines prototyped by Pratt and GE Aerospace.

The rest of the cost avoidance would result from not setting up a second—in Latka’s words, “duplicative”—production line and logistics train, since, she asserted, the Navy, Marine Corps, and many allies could not use the new engine, and would continue to depend on the existing support system.

The F135 is also fully tested and proven, whereas the new engines are not, and that increases the risk of delays and higher costs, Latka contended.

The approach would ensure Pratt would retain its lock on the F-35 engine market, whereas if the new engine is selected, the company could either lose or share that work with GE. For its part, GE insists that moving on to the new engines is important to keep the F-35 fully capable, to preserve a healthy defense industrial base, and is an affordable option.

Pratt received a $115 million contract Dec. 2 to develop upgrade options for the F135 in greater detail, but that contract does not rule out adoption of an adaptive engine for the requirement.

Air Force officials have said they plan to decide on whether to pursue either a new engine or an upgrade of the F135 by the end of calendar 2022. Funding would start in the fiscal 2024 budget, now being drawn up.    

The ECU would also mean quicker fielded capability, Latka said, asserting that the ECU could equip 24 squadrons by 2030, versus only two squadrons by that year using an adaptive engine. She said the ECU could deliver about seven percent more thrust and twice the cooling power of the current F135, using a new Emergency Power and Cooling System (EPACS) developed by Collins Aerospace.

The Block 4 F-35 will need more power, both for performance and to run and cool all the new equipment it will carry. Pratt was comparing its preferred ECU approach with replacing it using a new engine derived from the Adaptive Engine Transition Program.

Under the AETP—a technology effort intended to spark a significant step upgrade in fighter engine performance and efficiency—GE Aerospace created the XA-100 while Pratt developed the XA-101. Both AETP powerplants use a “third stream” of bypass air that serves to both cool the engine and make it more efficient and adaptable to either cruise or quick demands for high thrust. Both engines are heavier than the F135 but both would sharply improve the F-35’s performance.

The two companies claimed their AETP engines could improve the F-35’s range by 25-30 percent, generate a lot more electricity for jammers and directed-energy weapons, and increase available thrust.

Last year, Congress said it wanted to see AETP engines in the F-35 by 2027, but Pratt said that timeline is too ambitious. It could start installing ECUs in the F-35 in 2028, Latka said.

She also emphasized that the only part that would be changed is the core.

“We’re not touching the front end” or the exhaust system, Latka said.

Latka said Pratt could potentially port “almost all” of its AETP technology to the F135 core upgrade, but, “that’s not necessary, and it creates a tremendous amount of risk. So we’re being pretty limited in terms of the scope” of the upgrade.

Latka also said that with just a little more work, the ECU will be at “Technology Readiness Level Six” next year. That means it’s mostly mature technology with little developmental risk.

John Niemyer, F135 chief engineer, said the firm has “selected a subset of the AETP technologies” to go into the ECU, but he could not describe them in detail, except to say that some of the third-stream bypass technology is being fitted for a two-stream engine.

Pratt’s numbers are dependent on its own assessment of F135 improvement or replacement options. It made a formal study of options for the Air Force in the spring.

The Air Force has not signaled a preference for how it wants to meet the increased power needs of the F-35. The Joint Program Office has said that if the Air Force wants the new engine, it will have to pay the development and sustainment costs on its own, since the program mantra is “you have to pay to be different.”

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has said he’s spoken with Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro about using the AETP in Navy and Marine F-35s as well—and sharing the attendant cost—but has not reported how Del Toro has responded.

GE Aerospace insists the AETP engines could also be made to fit the F-35B and C models without sacrificing any of their performance or mandating significant structural changes.

Latka, meanwhile, said the shortage of F135 power modules that left a number of F-35s without engines last year has been “completely recovered. … There is no power mod shortage anymore.” She said “we’re actually far exceeding the program’s objectives” in terms of what was designed and funded at the program outset, “so this is really great news.”

New Chief Technology Officer for CENTCOM Explains Push for Experimentation

New Chief Technology Officer for CENTCOM Explains Push for Experimentation

U.S. military leaders have been clear; They want to field new technologies faster and adapt available commercial technology to better equip the future force. Now, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) is set to play a key role in that effort as part of a top-down push from commander Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla with the creation of new task forces and a chief technology officer position.

Within the past few years, CENTCOM has stood up multiple task forces focused on experimenting in the vast deserts of the Middle East and congested waters of the Arabian Gulf and Red Sea. It also plans to move forward with a new Red Sands program to test counter-unmanned aerial systems (c-UAS) across the region. And in October, the combatant command got its first chief technology officer to oversee these efforts—Schuyler Moore, who recently briefed reporters at the Pentagon

“We’re really focused on technology experimentation and what that can look like to create sustained capability, and we believe that a combatant command is the right place for that because it is so critical to get these technologies into the hands of the person that uses it, in the place that they will use it, and against the threats that it will actually face,” Moore said Dec. 7. “And commercial sector knows this. I mean, it would be unheard of to field any sort of technology without the user having our hands on it at some point, but it’s something that we at the department really need to lean forward into.”

Part of CENTCOM’s effort to invent new capabilities is driven by practical considerations. Its existing resources are limited, and U.S. military strategy and resources have shifted away from wars in the Middle East after two decades of warfare.

“In the future, success in how we fight will not be determined by the simple arithmetic of boots on the ground,” Colin Kahl, the undersecretary of defense for policy, said at a gathering of defense leaders in Bahrain in November. Kahl’s speech sought to explain the administration’s new National Defense Strategy to U.S. allies in the region, which has a reduced emphasis on CENTCOM.

While CENTCOM is fighting an ongoing war against ISIS fighters as part of Operation Inherent Resolve and faces persistent activity from Iran and its proxy forces, the Middle East is no longer the Department of Defense’s top priority, as the military shifts its resources toward bolstering capabilities n the Indo-Pacific.

But to fulfill the Pentagon’s regional policy and military goals and make the most of the U.S. presence, CENTCOM is looking to become an innovation and experimentation hub for the U.S. and allied militaries, according to Kahl and Kurilla.

“Innovation allows us to expand on the great partnerships we’ve built across the Middle East,” Kurilla said in November. “It allows us to increase the operational value of our manned systems.”

After initially fielding maritime surveillance platforms, CENTCOM has begun to sketch out its broader plan for experimenting with unmanned systems and artificial technology, including Air Forces Central’s Task Force 99, which stood up in October.

When it comes to testing and fielding new systems, Moore said CENTCOM is “particularly well-suited … for a couple of reasons,” including its harsh environment and real threats from malign actors, not simulated ones.

“It is incredibly hot, sandy, salty, windy in ways that will push, from a physical perspective,” Moore said. “… And then also, we have an environment that is active in ways that, frankly, others may not face the diversity of threats that we do.”

Beginning with the Navy’s Task Force 59, the command sought to field an array of unmanned, unarmed, commercially available platforms, including a network of more than 100 unmanned vessels to help monitor the waters as part of a network with American allies. Iran has taken notice—in September, Iranian vessels briefly captured two Navy Saildrones before returning them without their cameras.

CENTCOM is shifting towards the ground-based Army Task Force 39, which plans to stand up shortly, and the Air Force’s Task Force 99. According to Kurilla, Task Force 99 aims to create something like Task Force 59’s network.

“Task Force 99 will replicate Task Force 59’s efforts with a system of aerial drones with tailored payloads and other capabilities,” Kurrila said during his November speech. “Task Force 99’s fleet of unmanned aircraft will impose dilemmas on our adversaries and detect and defeat threats to our systems, and to our partners.”

Task Force 59 has moved from a purely experimental capability to one on which CENTCOM can rely for data.

“Previously, we’ve had a destroyer patrolling the Red Sea,” Moore said. “That’s the equivalent of one cop car patrolling the whole of California.”

Now, Task Force 59’s drones allow for more precise monitoring, she said.

Task Force 99 is beginning to find its footing in the air domain. The newly named “Desert Catalysts” primarily operate from Air Forces Central’s regional headquarters at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar. The detachment is led by Lt. Col. Erin Brilla, who heads a small team of eight Airmen, according to AFCENT. There is also a small detachment based at Ali Al Salem Air Base, Kuwait. Lt. Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich, the AFCENT commander, visited Task Force 99’s headquarters to check in on their efforts in early December.

Task Force 99 is focused on experimenting with variable payloads on small drones, according to CENTCOM. Moore said future capabilities plan to be tested in “sprints” of around 90 days to see what is viable. The exact capabilities Task Force 99 will field is unclear.

The threat posed by Iranian drones has become an international issue, as Russia has used them to wage its war in Ukraine and CENTCOM charges that they are continually used against the U.S. and its partners.

AFCENT’s forces conduct manned counter-UAS exercises to detect and defeat threats, but in a perfect world, CENTCOM’s new unmanned systems will feed an artificial intelligence-aided program to help aid manned aircraft in those functions, according to Kurilla.

“The sensors on these unmanned systems will constantly pick up information, giving us eyes and ears at sea, on land, and in the sky at all times,” Kurilla said. “Combined, these unmanned systems will operate on the same meshed network, feeding reams of data into an AI program that sorts it all out, makes sense of it, and pushes critical information to analysts in real-time. Those analysts are sharing this information with partnered forces, all of whom share the same threat picture and the same information.”

For now, CENTCOM is focused on stitching together as much information as possible.

“I think sometimes we hope for a solution that is the cure-all, that it is going to meet every single requirement for a counter-UAS coming in, that it is going to be the sensor that collects everything,” Moore said. “We are often promised this by vendors and by other folks that they will have the magic solution that does everything. The magic solution is when we take multiple solutions and work them together.”

27 Airmen Earn DFCs for Heroism in Afghanistan Evacuation

27 Airmen Earn DFCs for Heroism in Afghanistan Evacuation

More than two dozen Airmen at Travis Air Force Base, Calif., were officially awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross on Dec. 9 for their heroism in the noncombatant evacuation out of Kabul, Afghanistan. Among them were the first ever Critical Care Air Transport Team to receive the prestigious decoration. 

Maj. Gen. Corey Martin, commander of the 18th Air Force, presented the medals to 24 Airmen for actions on two separate missions. Three of the decorated Airmen were unable to attend. 

The crew of REACH 651, a C-17 flight that evacuated Afghan citizens from Kabul on Aug. 22, 2021, just a few days after the Taliban seized control of the capital city, was the first to be recognized. Amid concerns about suicide bombs and hijacking, the crew searched every passenger before boarding, then had to deal with two crises after takeoff—a suddenly ill passenger and a “potentially dangerous situation,” according to an Air Force release

The Airmen resolved both issues and ensured the plane landed safely in Qatar, bringing more than 450 people to safety. 

“I am extremely proud of my crew for their tireless efforts throughout the mission to ensure the flight deck was secure,” Maj. Drew Dela Cruz, C-17 pilot and REACH 651 aircraft commander, said in a statement. “The extremely good judgement they used and their calculated actions during chaos was crucial.” 

Travis hosts Distinguished Flying Cross ceremony
Honorees walk to the stage during the Distinguished Flying Cross presentation at Travis Air Force Base, California, Dec. 9, 2022. U.S. Air Force photo by Chustine Minoda

The second mission honored was MOOSE 98, another C-17 flight. That mission brought in a critical care air transport team on Aug. 26, the day a suicide bombing killed 13 U.S. service members and injured more than a dozen others. 

MOOSE 98 was the first flight on the ground after the bombing, and the CCATT helped evacuate the “most severely wounded personnel to receive immediate care,” including U.S. service members, Afghan civilians, and children. 

The team had to respond rapidly after loading severely wounded patients, as more wounded individuals kept coming without warning. By the time the mission was done, MOOSE 98 had executed the largest aeromedical evacuation airlift from Kabul Coalition Hospital. Every patient on the flight arrived safely at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Germany. 

“Although I was told what to expect, it was very shocking to see very young Marines, Sailors, and Soldiers walk on the plane with traumatic injuries,” said Maj. Katelyn Dunahoe, flight nurse with MOOSE 98, in a statement. “But my crew responded fast and effectively. The bravery and selflessness they all displayed is indescribable.” 

The Distinguished Flying Cross is the nation’s fourth-highest award for heroism—Air Mobility Command previously announced it was recognizing 96 Airmen with the medal for their actions during the Afghanistan evacuation. Last month, more than 50 Airmen were recognized in a ceremony at Joint Base Charleston, S.C., and 10 received their medals at Joint Base McGuire–Dix-Lakehurst, N.J. in early November. 

The Travis Airmen who received the DFC on Dec. 9 are: 

MOOSE 98 crew 

  • Lt. Col. Raul R. Montiague 
  • Lt. Col. William A. Street 
  • Maj. Katelyn E. Dunahoe 
  • Maj. Katie B. Lunning 
  • Maj. Pete N. Traylor 
  • Maj. Dominick A. Vitale 
  • Capt. Cody M. Apfel 
  • Capt. Jedd E. Dillman 
  • Capt. David L. Stuppy 
  • Capt. Spencer D. Yacos 
  • Master Sgt. Matthew A. Newman 
  • Tech. Sgt. Matthew D. Keefer 
  • Tech Sgt. Michael A. Raucci 
  • Staff Sgt. Idaliz Alicea 
  • Staff Sgt. Katherine Rosa Orellana 
  • Staff Sgt. Courtney Smith 
  • Senior Airman Mario Hernandez 
  • Senior Airman Deniece A. Lobban 
  • Senior Airman Alexis C. Sanchez 

REACH 651 crew 

  • Maj. Alexander A. Arcidiacono 
  • Maj. Drew P. Dela Cruz 
  • 1st Lt. Ryan S. Corvin 
  • Staff Sgt. Brandon S. Jensen 
  • Staff Sgt. E-Quantay L. Mason 
  • Senior Airman Kimberly S. Heiser 
  • Senior Airman Matthew S. Williams 
  • Airman 1st Class Jeremy Eda
Travis hosts Distinguished Flying Cross ceremony
Distinguished Flying Cross recipients receive a standing ovation from the audience during a Distinguished Flying Cross ceremony at Travis Air Force Base, California, Dec. 9, 2022. U.S. Air Force photo by Nicholas Pilch
How a B-1 Bomber Task Force ‘Pushed the Envelope’ on ACE

How a B-1 Bomber Task Force ‘Pushed the Envelope’ on ACE

A “light and lean” bomber task force deployed from Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D., to Guam for a month, operating from non-traditional locations alongside regional partners.

The test force deployment exercised Agile Combat Employment, counter-maritime operations with the Long Range Anti-ship Missile, and projected force in response to North Korean missile tests, the wing and task force leaders said in a Dec. 12 “Warfighters in Action” webcast hosted by the Air & Space Forces Association. 

Col. Joseph L. Sheffield, commander of the 28th Bomb Wing, and Lt. Col. Christopher McConnell, commander of the 37th Bomb Squadron, called the mid-October-to-late November deployment a key training opportunity. 

“From the squadron’s perspective, it’s just an amazing opportunity to get out there and show the B-1s’ long-range strike capabilities,” McConnell said. “It’s an opportunity for us to train, to integrate with allies and partners, and then get out there and actually do the mission in a theater away from home station.” 

Sheffield said the mission enabled the wing to “push the envelope” on Agile Combat Employment, in which Air Force units counter threats to central operating bases by dispersing and operating instead from numerous locations locations.  

“We’re trying to focus a little bit more on our Agile Combat Employment capabilities—what does that mean for a bomber, what does it mean for the B-1? And how would we do that?” Sheffield said. 

In this case, that meant deploying four B-1s and some 200 Airmen to Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, then flying 26 sorties for some 363 hours of flight.  

“When we did the continuous bomber presence, or the counter-terrorist fight, we’d go to a base that’s well established, well set-up,” Sheffield said. “But here, we want our aviators, the maintainers, and logistic personnel to experience the challenges of being away from that type of establishment, away from our home station.”

That’s a contrast to earlier in McConnell’s career, he said. “We didn’t have that much dynamic employment,” he explained. “It was a very continuous present to the location that we were going. … Now it’s a global challenge. We’re all over the place. We have young aviators and aircrew that have literally flown almost across the entire world.” 

Among the dynamic situations the task force experiened was hot-pit refueling at Misawa Air Base, Japan, “an opportunity for us to take a small maintenance footprint [and] deploy them to a non-traditional bomber location,” McConnell noted.  

To do that, McConnell’s Airmen had “to do things that may not necessarily be in their primary duties,” he said. Airmen have to have multiple capabilities, not just the ones in their narrow job description. “They’re going to have to adapt to whatever environment they show up in and be able to execute,” he said.  

The 37th Bomb Squadron didn’t stop with its own Airmen. “We used the opportunity while we were out at Anderson to train up some of the other folks that were on the base as well,” McConnell said. “‘Hey, just in case, let’s show you how to refuel a B-1. Let’s show you how to do some minor maintenance on it.’ Just in case we needed them and there may not be a maintenance team there in place at the time that we would need them. So it’s taking that proactive mindset of, ‘Where can we gain either efficiencies or gain advantages?’” 

After North Korea launched a barrage of missile tests, escalating tensions in the region in early November, the Task Force sent two B-1s alongside U.S. and South Korean fighter aircraft over the Korean peninsula—the first such flight in five years. 

“We provided the combatant commander a response option to some of the real-world events that occurred while we were there,” McConnell said. “And so, … we were able to, within hours of it occurring, launch two B-1s, which was a phenomenal job by our maintenance and ops personnel, because this was all in addition to the already busy scheduled flight ops that we had going on.” 

The maneuvers demonstrated solidarity with a key ally and demonstrated interoperability and experience, McConnell added. 

“We start to establish what those communication links are going to be like in that theater, so that we’re familiar with the operating environment, and we’re exposing our aircrew to how those operations are going to occur,” he said. 

In addition to pushing ACE concepts, the deployment was also aimed at boosting the 28th BW’s proficiency with maritime missions, McConnell added. Early in the deployment, Airmen and Sailors practiced loading and releasing naval mines from the B-1s.  

At other points, Airmen worked with the Navy to practice their skills with the Long Range Anti-ship Missile, a stealthy ballistic missile “designed to detect and destroy specific targets within groups of surface warships.” 

“We are the threshold platform for the Air Force for LRASM. We’ve got some of the best LRASM experts right here in the B-1 community and right here at the 28th Bomb Wing,” McConnell said. “And we’ve focused a lot of our training plans on becoming those LRASM experts, working along with the Navy and trying to develop the [tactics, techniques, and procedures] to perfect those capabilities 

Col. Joe Kittinger—Fighter Pilot, POW, Longtime Freefall Record Holder—Dies at 94

Col. Joe Kittinger—Fighter Pilot, POW, Longtime Freefall Record Holder—Dies at 94

Col. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., a Vietnam-era fighter pilot, prisoner of war, and recipient of the Harmon Trophy whose freefall jump records earned him a place in the National Aviation Hall of Fame, died Dec. 9 at the age of 94.

Kittinger, who was also awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross and two Silver Star medals, was most widely known for Project Excelsior, a series of freefall jumps from research balloons that he made to both test the effects of high altitude on the human body and to improve the safety of pilots ejecting from aircraft at very high altitudes.

His records stood for 52 years until 2012, when he helped daredevil Felix Baumgartner break most of them.

Kittinger was born in Tampa, Fla., in July 1928. He entered the Air Force through the aviation cadet program at age 21, earning his wings in 1950. He flew P-51 fighters in Germany until 1953, when he joined the Air Force Missile Development Center. There he flew experimental aircraft and conducted aeromedical research. He made the switch because of the allure of more flying time and potential “adventure,” he later told an interviewer.

Among his activities at the center, Kittinger flew zero-gravity missions and flew “chase” for high-speed rocket sled runs made by fellow researcher John Stapp.

He joined Projects Man High and Mile High to study the effects of cosmic radiation on human physiology in preparation for U.S. manned space missions. As the pilot of a balloon dubbed “Mile High One,” Kittinger achieved an altitude of 96,000 feet, about a quarter of the way to outer space.  For this work, he received the Distinguished Flying Cross.

Project Excelsior, which ran from 1959 to 1960, was meant to study the ability of a human being to survive an extremely-high altitude ejection. Kittinger, in a space suit, jumped from Excelsior I, II and III, from 76,000 feet, 74,000 and 102,800 feet, respectively—the last being about 20 miles above the surface of the Earth. The Excelsior I mission was disastrous and nearly killed him, as the drogue line wrapped around his body and he blacked out from spinning in descent, enduring 22Gs. He was saved by an automatic back-up chute.

Joseph Kittinger next to the Excelsior gondola on June 2, 1957. USAF

On the final record ascent, he discovered that his right glove had not been properly pressurized, and he told Air & Space Forces Magazine in 2014 that his hand had “doubled in size” due to the low atmospheric pressure. He also nearly suffocated, as his air hose pushed against the helmet neck midway through the ascent but became freed near the apex of the flight. The ambient temperature at the time of his jump was -94 degrees Fahrenheit.

On the last mission, he set records for highest balloon ascent, longest parachute freefall—about 16 miles—and fastest speed by a human moving through the atmosphere without an aircraft: 614 miles per hour.

The missions were also meant to test improved parachute design for ejections in atmospheric regions of low air density and at high velocity.

“One of the objectives,” Kittinger told an interviewer in 2014, “was to devise a means of escape from very high altitude.” Reserarch and experience had shown that pilots ejecting at high altitude or extreme speed went into dangerous spins. He said the drogue chute design resulting from the research “is still in use today; every ejection seat has it. That makes me and my team very proud because we made a contribution.”

A photo of Kittinger, automatically taken after he made his record jump, was featured on the cover of Life Magazine. He also appeared on TV on “The Ed Sullivan Show” and “What’s My Line,” discussing his exploits.

In 1960, Kittinger received the Harmon Trophy directly from President Dwight Eisenhower for “outstanding accomplishments in aeronautics.” His final high-altitude balloon flight was with Project Stargazer in 1962, in which he explored the feasibility of performing astronomical research from high-altitude balloons as part of a two-man crew.

Returning to the combat air forces in 1963, Kittinger deployed to Vietnam, where he flew the A-26 Invader for two tours. After a stint as a fighter pilot with US Air Forces, Europe in Germany, he returned to Southeast Asia in 1971, flying F-4 Phantoms out of Udorn Royal Thai Air Force Base. He commanded the 555th Fighter Squadron.

Kittinger shot down a MiG-21 in combat on March 1, 1972, engaging a “superior number of enemy aircraft” which were attacking friendly ground forces, according to his Silver Star commendation. Two months later, however, he was shot down, along with his backseater, 1st Lt. William Reich, and taken prisoner.

He spent 321 days as a POW in the infamous “Hanoi Hilton,” enduring repeated torture and serving for a time as the commander of the prisoners. Kittinger became skilled at catching rats for additional protein and led the other prisoners in defiant religious services and exercises.  He was repatriated in 1973 after the Paris Peace Accords, as part of Operation Homecoming.

“We never doubted we would get released,” Kittinger said in 2014. “It made us better Americans, to appreciate what we had. Being a POW was life-changing.” He received a second Silver Star for his heroism as a POW.

Returning to duty, he attended the Air War College and then served as a Vice Wing Commander in USAFE. He retired from the Air Force as a Colonel in July, 1978, with 29 years of service, having accrued more than 7,600 flying hours and 483 combat missions.

kittinger
Capt. Joseph Kittinger Jr. USAF

Kittinger continued to fly aircraft and balloons in retirement, accumulating a further 9,100-plus flying hours. In September 1984, he became the first person to make a solo crossing of the Atlantic Ocean in a helium balloon, flying from Maine to Italy, where making a crash landing, he broke his foot. That year, he was elected to the National Aviation Hall of Fame.

At the time, he told U.S. News and World Report: “Life is an adventure, and I’m an adventurer. You just have to go for it. That is the American way.”

In 2008, he received the National Air and Space Museum Award for his lifetime of achievements.

After turning down requests for assistance from many seeking to break his parachuting records—because they were either not prepared for the attempt or not able to make the requisite investment in equipment—Kittinger agreed to help Felix Baumgartner of Red Bull fame. Besides consulting on the design of the 2012 attempt, Kittinger served as the “capsule communicator” for Baumgartner, talking him through the ascent in the gondola and ensuing 24-mile jump, during which Baumgartner exceeded the speed of sound, traveling at 833.9 mph.

Although Baumgartner fell a greater distance than Kittinger, he popped his parachute a few seconds shy of Kittinger’s freefall record, which still stands.

Joe Kittinger Park in Orlando, Fla. is named for him; it is decorated with an F-4 on a pole that is painted as Kittinger’s aircraft in Vietnam.

He published an autobiography in 2011, “Come Up and Get Me,” co-authored with Craig Ryan. The book’s forward was written by Apollo moonwalker Neil Armstrong.

First Test of All-Up ARRW Hypersonic Missile Deemed a Success

First Test of All-Up ARRW Hypersonic Missile Deemed a Success

The first operationally-configured AGM-183 Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW) flew a successful test flight Dec. 9, the Air Force reported, marking three successful powered flights in a row for the hypersonic air-to-ground missile.

The test, conducted from a B-52 off the southern California coast, was “the first launch of a full prototype operational missile,” the service said. The all-up round was released from the bomber, accelerated to hypersonic speed, separated from its booster, and continued to fly at speeds “greater than five times the speed of sound,” according to a release the 96th Test Wing at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.

The ARRW then “completed its flight path and detonated in the target area.”

The Air Force declined to provide further details to Air & Space Forces Magazine. “Hypersonic” speed is in excess of Mach 5, or five times the speed of sound.

The mission was flown by the 412th Test Wing out of Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. Hypersonic flights of the ARRW took place in May and July of this year.

“The ARRW team successfully designed and tested an air-launched hypersonic missile in five years,” Brig. Gen. Jason Bartolomei, Armament Directorate Program Executive Officer, said in a statement, adding that he’s proud of the “tenacity and dedication this team has shown to provide a vital capability to our warfighter.”

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control is the developer and builder of the ARRW. The test program had a rocky start with multiple launch failures, but the success of the December test indicates the program is on more solid footing.

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall said early this year he wants to see more consistent performance from the missile before discussing its future service with Global Strike Command. Congress trimmed $161 million from ARRW production funding in fiscal year 2022 citing program delays and launch failures. Kendall has also said hypersonic missiles are not as high a priority for USAF as they are for China, due to different force employment operational concepts. China is considered ahead of the U.S. in developing and fielding hypersonic weapons.

The air-to-ground ARRW “is designed to enable the U.S. to hold fixed, high-value, time-sensitive targets at risk in contested environments,” the Air Force said.

A Lockheed spokesperson said the test “demonstrates the missile’s operational end-to-end capability at hypersonic speeds, validating the design and production” of the system.

“We are on the cusp of an operational capability that can be deployed to the men and women in uniform,” Jay Pitman, vice president of air dominance and strike weapons at Lockheed MFC, said in a statement. The test shows the “commitment, rigor, and dedication of the joint U.S. Government and Lockheed Martin team to develop hypersonic weapons on accelerated timelines to meet critical national security needs,” he said.

The ARRW program has carried out numerous developmental steps including “captive carriage flights, sled testing, warhead qualification, solid rocket motor qualification, and two consecutive hypersonic-boosted flight tests,” Lockheed added.

Last week, Airmen at the 2nd Bomb Wing at Barksdale Air Force Base, La., ironed out the procedures for loading and unloading the ARRW in an operational setting, the Air Force said. Thus far, the missile had only been loaded onto test aircraft.

The ARRW is one of two hypersonic missiles being developed by USAF to attack urgent, time-sensitive targets. The ARRW is boosted to hypersonic speed by a rocket, then glides to its target—hence its name “boost glide”—whereas the Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile, or HACM, is an air-breathing system that uses a scramjet to sustain hypersonic flight. Raytheon was selected in September as the prime contractor for HACM.

B-2 Damaged Following Emergency Landing and Fire at Whiteman

B-2 Damaged Following Emergency Landing and Fire at Whiteman

Editor’s Note: This story was updated the evening of Dec. 12 to include details about the runway at Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo.

A B-2 Spirit was damaged Dec. 10 after the crew was forced to make an emergency landing at Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., the Air Force said. The stealth bombers cost over $1 billion per plane and fewer than two dozen were produced, making any incident a potentially significant event for the service’s bomber fleet. The incident shut down the lone runway at Whiteman, which is the home base for the entire fleet of B-2s.

“A U.S. Air Force B-2 Spirit experienced an in-flight malfunction during routine operations Dec. 10 and was damaged on the runway at Whiteman Air Force Base after it successfully completed an emergency landing,” a spokesperson for the 509th Bomb Wing said in a statement to Air & Space Forces Magazine. “There were no personnel injuries. There was a fire associated with the aircraft after landing, and the base fire department extinguished the fire. The incident is under investigation.”

News of the incident and an accompanying photo appeared on the popular unofficial Air Force amn/nco/anco page Facebook page, suggesting the B-2 left the runway at Whiteman and there was a possible fire.

The 509th Bomb Wing confirmed the B-2 suffered damage in an incident and there was a fire. But the spokesperson did not address specific questions about whether the B-2 itself caught fire or how the aircraft was damaged on the runway.

In September 2021, a B-2 was involved in an incident at Whiteman. An Air Force accident investigation found that the aircraft’s landing gear collapsed, causing the aircraft’s left wing to drag across the ground until the plane came to a rest in the grass about a mile from the touchdown point. The pilots were uninjured, but the aircraft incurred a minimum of $10 million in damage, according to the Air Force.

The crew declared an in-flight emergency before attempting to land due to an issue with the B-2’s hydraulic system when they tried to deploy the landing gear on approach to Whiteman, the Air Force’s investigation found. The report said that the left main landing gear collapsed on touchdown despite cockpit indicators showing the landing gear was locked after the crew conducted an emergency extension.

The Air Force only has 20 B-2s in its inventory, and it is unclear how many are operational daily. A B-2 was destroyed in a crash in 2008, and Air Force has gone to great lengths to keep its remaining inventory airworthy after incidents, including major repairs to the aircraft involved in the 2021 incident at Whiteman and a four-year effort to restore an aircraft damaged in a fire in Guam.

The 509th Bomb Wing did not provide details on the extent of the damage to the aircraft that suffered the mishap on Dec. 10. The incident was significant enough base’s sole runway remained closed as of the evening of Dec. 12.

“At this time, the Whiteman Air Force Base runway is closed, and recovery teams are working around the clock to minimize further disruptions,” the 509th Bomb Wing said in a statement.

Air Force Global Strike Command, which is in charge of the Air Force’s fleet of B-2s, said there was “no impact on AFGSC operations” due to the incident.

Whiteman, the home base for the Air Force’s entire fleet of B-2s, recently conducted an “elephant walk” exercise with eight B-2s.

The B-2 is set to be replaced with the newly-unveiled B-21 Raider in the 2030s. However, the B-21 has yet to fly and is still years from entering service, making the small fleet of B-2s precious to the Air Force as the service’s only stealth strategic bombers.