Hybrid Capabilities Propel Industry Partners to ‘Accelerate Change and Win’

Hybrid Capabilities Propel Industry Partners to ‘Accelerate Change and Win’

Emerging threats in space and the rise of commercial satellite technologies are driving the national security space sector in a new, hybrid direction to answer the evolving needs of the Air Force and Space Force.

“Traditional aerospace and defense companies develop their national security space systems based on customer requirements and an acquisition strategy,” said Jason Kim, CEO of Millennium Space Systems, a Boeing Company. “But commercial companies don’t have to abide by those requirements or acquisition cycles.” 

Commercial companies continually invest to upgrade their technology, as long as they see a return on that investment.  

This private financing model provides a unique opportunity for industry partners to push Air Force and Space Force capabilities ahead of modern-day demands to meet the needs of the future. 

“Commercial companies are not designing systems based on a requirements pool, an RFP, or an agency’s acquisition strategy,” Kim said. “They are seeing things in the market based on modern technologies that are commercially available and providing that as a capability. It’s becoming more of a commercial technology push that creates new market demand, while also addressing a government requirement not yet thought of before.”

Founded in 2001, Millennium Space Systems, a small satellite prototype and constellation company, embodies this hybrid nature of leveraging both commercial technologies and traditional aerospace and defense industry capabilities, including secure and tailored systems.

“We started off taking a lot of the commercial dual-use technologies that were available at the time and space-qualified them with the aim of providing systems on rapid timelines and at affordable costs,” Kim said. With its acquisition by the Boeing Company in 2018, Millennium gained the capability to scale its systems and deliver entire constellations of satellites. 

“We’re now seeing our systems delivered in missile warning, missile tracking, ISR, and advanced space science missions,” Kim said. To build at that kind of scale, Millennium is continually tech-refreshing. “We invest constantly in research and development and are regularly tech refreshing our components and mission capabilities,” Kim said. 

The lessons taken from the first launch of small satellites can be applied to the next launch.  “We’re an engineering company, and we operate our spacecraft, so we’re able to get data on all of our spacecraft components on-orbit and feed that back to the design process. We’re able to apply what we’ve learned into how we manufacture our constellations to improve and tech refresh our components every time we deliver them.”

This capability enables the Air Force and Space Force to align with the go-fast message of Chief of Space Operations Gen. John Raymond and his partner in arms, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr. 

“The Air Force has stated that we have to ‘Accelerate Change or Lose’ to respond to the advanced threats challenging our capabilities,” Kim said. Millennium addresses that imperative by taking “the most advanced systems in the commercial world” and “space-qualifying those capabilities and making them secure and interoperable,” he said. 

Millennium builds 80 percent of its spacecraft components in-house. “A majority of those components are using dual-use commercial technologies,” Kim said. “For example, we take battery technology from the commercial automotive industry and apply that to national security space missions to gain cost savings and faster timelines for our customers.”

This is what Kim means by “space-qualifying” commercial tech.

“Space qualification entails having the right experts that know how to test these components for radiation, susceptibility to upsets, and latch up,” he said. Requirements vary depending on the deployment model. 

“The distinct radiation environments of LEO [low-Earth orbit], MEO [mid-Earth orbit] and GEO [geosynchronous orbit] demand different constraints, requirements and limitations on these technologies,” Kim said. 

Space-qualifying these technologies requires a rigorous process of radiation testing, vibe testing, and thermal testing in vacuum chambers similar to conditions experienced during a launch and orbit. “Once we test all these components in piece parts, we’re able to take that data and really select the parts that are able to withstand the harsh environments that our systems are going to operate in.”

As part of Boeing, Millennium can access a host of capabilities with expertise in supply chain management, manufacturing, and so much more. “We’re able to take advantage of a lot of resources that [Boeing] provides in mission domain expertise,” Kim said. “[Boeing] has a lot of senior technical fellows that we’re able to deploy to our different flight programs to help us enhance capabilities and overcome challenges. We also have been able to bring in a lot of expertise in model-based systems engineering and digital engineering, which includes the tools that they’ve invested in and the processes that they’ve developed over the years, as well as a lot of the proof points and lessons learned from other programs in other domains.”

Millennium Space Systems remains an agile, flexible player, providing its customers with the best of all worlds: The nimbleness of a startup and the strength and experience of an aerospace giant. 

“Millennium can keep ahead of advanced threats, to really sense the threats, track them, and provide information directly to the warfighters,” Kim said. “Our hybrid nature enables us to do two things: Invest to bring forward future capabilities and to rapidly adapt to changing requirements. That’s what our customers need.”

Air Combat Command Declares IOC for New Rescue Helicopter

Air Combat Command Declares IOC for New Rescue Helicopter

Air Combat Command said its new HH-60W Jolly Green II has achieved initial operational capability, a key milestone for the new combat search and rescue helicopter.

Lockheed Martin, whose Sikorsky business unit makes the helicopter, and ACC each announced the achievement in separate press releases Oct. 12.

Achieving IOC means the Air Force now has the Airmen, equipment, and logistics in place to deploy a package of four HH-60Ws to any independent location for up to 30 days.

“It’s an exciting day for combat rescue as we bring a new platform and its upgraded capabilities into operation,” said Maj. Gen. David Lyons, director of operations at ACC, in the release. “Current and future combat environments require us to maneuver further and faster than ever before, and the capabilities provided by the Jolly Green II supports the platform’s viability for our Air Force Personnel Recovery core function for as long as possible.”

Sikorsky has delivered 24 HH-60Ws thus far, with dozens more aircraft still to come. The 23rd Wing at Moody Air Force Base, Ga., and the 58th Special Operations Wing at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., both have the helicopter, which completed testing at Duke Field, Fla., and Nellis Air Force Base, Nev.

The HH-60W had its first operational deployment from Moody on Sept. 23, to provide rescue services in support of contingency operations. A 23rd Wing spokesperson could not immediately confirm where the helicopters deployed.

“This declaration is a vote of confidence from U.S. Air Force leadership and demonstrates the critical role of and need for the HH-60W,” Nathalie Previte, vice president of Sikorsky Army & Air Force Systems, said in a statement. “Sikorsky is committed to continuing deliveries of the Department of Defense’s only dedicated combat search and rescue (CSAR) helicopter and to provide the most capable platform to rescue crews who depend on this aircraft day-in and day-out to conduct vital life-saving missions.”

ACC said in February in a release that it anticipated full operational capability by now. The Air Force’s 2023 budget request sought to reduce its HH-60W purchase plans from the originally planned 113 to 75. Both the Senate Appropriations Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee have balked at that plan, with each asking the Air Force to report back on on the future of CSAR in their respective defense bills.

The Jolly Green II is an upgrade over the HH-60G Pave Hawk, which the Air Force has flown since the 1980s. The new helicopter has more range and is more survivable, and it features advanced avionics and other benefits. It is one of two new helicopters the Air Force is bringing into service, with the MH-139 Grey Wolf having recently entered utility testing after a yearlong delay.

US, Allies Pledge Improved Air Defenses for Ukraine

US, Allies Pledge Improved Air Defenses for Ukraine

The United States and allies will help Ukraine build a more comprehensive air defense system to protect key targets from Russian attacks by cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and aircraft, U.S. officials said Oct. 12.

“What Ukraine is asking for and what we think can be provided is an integrated air and missile defense system,” Gen. Mark A. Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said as representatives from about 50 nations met in Brussels. “That doesn’t control all the airspace over Ukraine. But they are designed to control priority targets that Ukraine needs to protect.”

Russia launched a barrage of missiles and air strikes against a variety of civilian targets in Ukrainian cities, including its capital, Kyiv, on Oct. 10 in retaliation for the bombing of a key bridge linking Russia to the occupied Crimean peninsula.

“These attacks killed and injured civilians and destroyed targets with no military purpose,” President Joe Biden said in a statement, calling the Russian strikes “utter brutality.”

Ukraine renewed its plea for better air defense systems to protect the population following the attacks, and the so-called Contact Group countries responded favorably.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III said help will come soon. “The systems will be provided as fast as we can physically get them there,” Austin said at his news conference with Milley. “We’re going to do everything we can, as fast as we can to help the Ukrainian forces get the capability they need to protect the Ukrainian people. That’s very, very important to us.”

The allied officials did not say when such defenses might be put in place and acknowledged connecting different pieces from a myriad of nations would be a technical and logistical challenge and would require training of Ukrainian forces.

“The task will be to bring those together, get them deployed, get them trained because each of these systems is different,” Milley said.

Ukraine would also have to develop a detection and command and control system and link all the components together.

“It’s quite complicated from a technical standpoint,” Milley said. “It is achievable, and that’s what we’re aiming at.”

The U.S. leaders detailed several specific systems they said could help form the basis of Ukraine’s new air defenses, in addition to systems such as Soviet-era S-300 systems already in use that have “been very effective,” according to Milley. Advanced systems, such as the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System (NASAMS) are already in the pipeline but will take years to be fully deployed.

For example, Milley noted the I-HAWK, a legacy U.S. Army medium-range surface-to-air system which he said the Ukrainian government has specifically asked for. Milley and Austin also mentioned Germany’s InfraRed Imaging System Tail (IRIS-T) system, which is now being delivered. The possibility of U.S.-made Patriot batteries and Israeli defenses was floated by Milley, though he acknowledged such systems were among those that could be used rather than concrete offers from a particular country. Ukraine has repeatedly asked for Patriot systems and Israel’s Iron Dome.

Some experts cautioned that it would be difficult to build an exhaustive air defense system for Ukraine and that an ad-hoc system would have to be adopted in practice.

“It may be something closer to interoperability, or frankly, it may just be instead of integration, aggregation,” Tom Karako of the Center for Strategic and International Studies said. “But it’s the right aspiration. The threat makes it necessary to think imaginatively about these things.”

Neither side has been able to control the skies over Ukraine with their air force, despite Russia’s overwhelming relative advantage as one of the world’s biggest air forces. U.S. leaders have noted that Ukraine’s ability to deny Russia air superiority has prevented Russia from making sweeping gains on the battlefield by taking out the Ukrainian military from the air and allowing Russian ground forces to operate unmolested.

Much of the world’s attention had shifted to the war of attrition occurring in the east and south of the country as Ukraine fights to regain control of its territory using artillery and ground forces.

Russia, however, possesses long-range weapons, primarily air-launched cruise missiles that it can fire from bombers inside Russian airspace, as well as ballistic missiles.

These missiles can make it through to targets inside Ukraine due to the lack of a comprehensive air defense system Ukraine’s allies now say they will work to help provide. Some defenses the U.S. supplied early in the war, such as man-portable Stinger missiles that can be fired at low-flying planes and helicopters, are useless in the face of the standoff weapons Russia is implementing. According to the U.S. and Ukraine, thousands of Iranian-made drones have also been ordered by Russia, though Ukraine has had better success against those weapons due to their slow speed and low attitude.

In the future, Ukraine wants a system that can defend against both planes and missiles at low, medium, and high attitude.

“It’s a mix of all these that deny the airspace,” Milley said. “You’re trying to create a defensive system.”

Pentagon Nominates New AFGSC Commander, New Deputy CSO for Operations

Pentagon Nominates New AFGSC Commander, New Deputy CSO for Operations

President Joe Biden nominated a pair of Air Force and Space Force generals for promotion and assignment to critical new roles, the Pentagon announced Oct. 12.

Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas A. Bussiere is nominated for a fourth star and to be the next commander of Air Force Global Strike Command, while Space Force Maj. Gen. DeAnna M. Burt is to receive a third star and take over as deputy chief of space operations for operations, cyber, and nuclear.

If confirmed, Bussiere would replace Air Force Gen. Anthony J. Cotton, already confirmed by the Senate to become head of U.S. Strategic Command; Burt, if confirmed, would succeed Lt. Gen. Chance B. Saltzman, also already confirmed to become only the second Space Force Chief of Space Operations.

Bussiere has been deputy commander at U.S. STRATCOM since April 2020. A command pilot, he has flown F-15s, F-22s, B-1s, and B-2s, and commanded at the at Squadron, Group, Wing, and Numbered Air Force levels. He led bomber squadrons and the 509th Bomb Wing at Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., the Eighth and Eleventh Air Forces, and U.S. Northern Command’s Alaska Command. He also has experience at AFGSC headquarters, having been special assistant to the commander and inspector general in two prior stints.

Burt is currently special assistant to Space Force Chief Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond, who is to retire in November when Saltzman replaces him. But Burt moved to that post only recently, having previously commanded the Combined Force Space Component Command, a multi-national subordinate command of f U.S. Space Command, where she was dual-hatted as vice commander of Space Operations Command. She was succeeded in that post in August by Maj. Gen. Douglas A. Schiess.

Burt’s prior commands include the 2nd Space Operations Squadron, the 460th Operations Group, and the 50th Space Wing, and she was director of operations and communications for Space Operations Command.

Should Burt be confirmed, she would join a small cadre of three-star generals in the Space Force’s ranks—there are currently six total. She would also join Lt. Gen. Nina M. Armagno as the only female three-stars in the service.

Biden’s National Security Strategy Aims to Prepare for ‘Decisive Decade’

Biden’s National Security Strategy Aims to Prepare for ‘Decisive Decade’

The Biden administration’s long-awaited National Security Strategy predicts that the 2020s will be a “decisive decade,” requiring the U.S. to “outmaneuver” and compete with an aggressive, well-financed China and a “dangerous” Russia by investing in the American people and marshaling U.S. allies to cooperate for the advancement of democracy and free markets.

The strategy effectively abandons previous, unsuccessful attempts to bring Russia into a cooperative world order and pledges to hold Moscow accountable for its brutal invasion of Ukraine. It pledges to work with Europe to develop “energy independence” from Russia and threatens to further isolate Moscow if it continues to pursue an imperialistic strategy of adding territory by military means.

The strategy follows an “interim” version released in the spring of 2021. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine forced a series of rewrites as the President’s national security team sought to adapt to changing conditions.

The National Security Strategy is the umbrella document for the National Defense Strategy, Nuclear Posture Review, and Missile Defense Review. The release of the unclassified NSS suggests that an unclassified version of the other documents will be released soon.  

According to the new strategy, China is the only country possessing both the “intent” to reshape the world order and the economic and military means to potentially accomplish that. Beijing has “ambitions” of being the world’s greatest military power, the document states, and is using its considerable clout to expand its sphere of influence, its brand of authoritarianism, and to “mold global technology use and norms” to its own advantage.

China’s military is “growing in strength and reach globally … while seeking to erode U.S. alliances,” the NSS asserted. Beijing uses its economic power to “coerce” other countries and the openness of the global economy to expand its exports, even as it restricts access to its own domestic markets, with the aim of making the world more dependent on its goods and services.

In response, the U.S. must “invest in the foundations of our strength at home”—innovation, competitiveness, resilience, and democracy. The U.S. must also strengthen its ties to allies and friends, the NSS states, and “compete responsibly” with China to “defend our interests and build our vision for the future.”

Time is of the essence, the strategy states: “The next 10 years will be the decisive decade.” The U.S. faces an “inflection point … where the choices we make and the priorities we pursue today will set us on a course that determines our competitive position long into the future.”

The NSS lists various aggressions and broken promises from China in the Pacific region, including the crackdown on democracy in Hong Kong and intimidation of Taiwan. The strategy pledges “prioritizing investments in a combat-credible military that deters aggression against our allies and partners in the region, and can help those allies and partners defend themselves.”

The U.S. strategy stats that the nation is committed to “maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait” and opposes any “unilateral change” in the status quo “from either side.” The United States will honor its commitments to “support Taiwan’s self-defense and to maintain our capacity to resist any resort to force or coercion against Taiwan.”

Despite the need to compete with China and Russia, though, the U.S. is willing to work with those countries if they are willing to do so in constructive ways, the strategy says. It also lays the blame for the Ukraine war squarely on Russian President Vladimir Putin and makes an unsubtle pitch for regime change in that country.

It is the Russian people who must “determine Russia’s future as a major power capable of once more playing a constructive role” on the world stage.

Russia has made itself less of a long-term threat because of the Ukraine invasion, the NSS asserts.

Putin’s war “has profoundly diminished Russia’s status vis-a-vis China and other Asian powers such as India and Japan,” according to the NSS. “Moscow’s soft power and diplomatic influence have waned, while its efforts to weaponize energy have backfired. The historic global response to Russia’s war against Ukraine sends a resounding message that countries cannot enjoy the benefits of global integration while trampling on the core tenets of the UN Charter.”

The NSS asserts that Russia has been militarily weakened by its heavy losses of troops and equipment in Ukraine, and the strategy voices concern that Russia will increasingly make up for that deficit with nuclear threats.

“The United States will not allow Russia, or any power, to achieve its objectives through using, or threatening to use, nuclear weapons,” the NSS states. “America retains an interest in preserving strategic stability and developing a more expansive, transparent, and verifiable arms control infrastructure to succeed New START and in rebuilding European security arrangements which, due to Russia’s actions, have fallen in to disrepair”—a reference to the conventional forces in Europe treaty and the intermediate nuclear forces agreement, which Russia pulled out of.

The U.S., with its allies and partners, is “helping to make Russia’s war on Ukraine a strategic failure,” the NSS said, by “constraining” that country’s strategic economic sectors, “including defense and aerospace, and we will continue to counter Russia’s attempts to weaken and destabilize sovereign nations and undermine multilateral institutions.”

NATO has been bolstered by its united front against Russia’s aggression and by the imminent admission of Finland and Sweden to the alliance, the NSS asserts, and it is stronger not only conventionally but also against “asymmetric threats” such as cyberattacks and Russia’s meddling in foreign elections.

Although the “trajectory” of the Ukraine war will determine some aspects of future U.S. policy, the NSS said the U.S. will “continue to support Ukraine in its fight for its freedom” and will help that country “recover economically.” The strategy encouraged Ukraine’s “regional integration with the European Union” but stopped short of advocating for its admission to NATO.

As Biden has previously said, the strategy pledges that the U.S. “will defend every inch of NATO territory and will continue to build and deepen a coalition with allies and partners to prevent Russia from causing further harm to European security, democracy, and institutions.”

The U.S. will also “deter and, as necessary, respond” to any Russian actions that threaten U.S. core interests, “including Russian attacks on our infrastructure and our democracy.”

National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said at a press conference addressing the strategy that “We are not seeking to have competition tip over into confrontation or a new Cold War.”

But China and other autocracies are moving aggressively to undermine Democracy, he added, and the coming decade will “shape the future of the international order.”

The U.S. will compete economically, diplomatically, and militarily to shape the world, Sullivan said, but the administration will strive to prevent a costly era of proxy confrontations or new arms races.

Sullivan said the forthcoming Nuclear Posture Review will be consistent with the NSS in setting a goal for “the reduction of the role of nuclear weapons in American strategy,” a point already made in the interim NSS released in March 2021, which he called one of the key “departures” from the Trump administration’s strategy.

The 47-page unclassified summary of the NSS concludes that the U.S, with its allies and partners, “is positioned to succeed in our pursuit of a free, open, prosperous and secure global order.” Besides out-competing autocratic challengers to that order, the U.S. will also tackle “shared challenges” such as “climate change, pandemic preparedness, and food security, that will define the next stage of human history.”

The U.S. will also seek to establish “fair rules of the road” for emerging technologies, cybersecurity, trade, and economics. It will do this by leveraging its considerable economic and military power and “our unparalleled coalition of allies and partners.”

The NSS says the U.S. will modernize its military, pursue advanced technologies, and invest in the defense workforce. By doing so, “we will have strengthened deterrence in an era of increasing geopolitical confrontation, and positioned America to defend our homeland, our allies, partners, and interests overseas, and our values across the globe.”

“We are motivated by a clear vision of what success looks like” at the end of the decade, the NSS states.

“By enhancing our industrial capacity, investing in our people, and strengthening our democracy, we will have strengthened the foundation of our economy, bolstered our national resilience, enhanced our credibility on the world stage, and ensured our competitive advantages.”

Regionally, the NSS says the U.S. will work to “reinforce” Turkey’s ties to NATO and the West, after that nation has drawn closer to Russia in recent years.

In the Middle East, there’s little change in the U.S. position on Israel and its neighbors, encouraging Arab nations that have not yet done so to normalize relations with Israel; and maintaining support for a two-state resolution to the Palestinian issue.

Despite Russian and Chinese moves to have a greater presence and role in the Arctic, the NSS seems to downplay this, saying the U.S. will increase its presence there “as required” while striving to “prevent unnecessary escalation.”

The NSS says the U.S. will work to counter “coercion” of South American states by China, Russia, and Iran.

The new strategy also pledges that the U.S. will “stand up for freedom of navigation and overflight” because the world depends on free access to the global commons for its security and prosperity.

The U.S. will “stand up to threats” to that access.

It will also “support environmental protection, and uphold destructive distant fishing practices by upholding international laws and norms … including” the U.N.’s laws of the sea. It will also work to preserve Antarctica’s status “as a continent reserved for peace and science.”

The U.S. also plans to “maintain our position as the world’s leader in space” but to work with the international community “to ensure the domain’s sustainability, safety, stability, and security.” The U.S. plans to lead in “updating space governance,” including traffic systems and a “path for future space norms and arms control.” It will work to improve the “resilience” of its space systems, protect U.S. interests in space, “avoid destabilizing arms races, and responsibly steward the environment.”

Cruise Missile Defense of North America is a ‘Picket Fence,’ NORAD Commander Says

Cruise Missile Defense of North America is a ‘Picket Fence,’ NORAD Commander Says

The top general in charge of the defense of North America delivered a sobering account of Russian and Chinese threats and described his command’s ability to detect and defend against a cruise missile attack as little more than a “picket fence.”

The U.S. homeland is under the most significant threat since the end of the Cold War, the head of North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) Air Force Gen. Glen D. VanHerck said Oct. 11.

“For the first time in our nation’s history, [we have] two strategic peers, both nuclear-armed, that we need to deal with,” VanHerck said at the Association of the United States Army conference in Washington, D.C. “While we were focused on violent extremists for last 20-plus years, they were developing capabilities to hold our homeland at risk.”

More concretely, Russia possesses a large arsenal of cruise missiles and platforms to fire them with little warning to the United States.

That is an issue for the North Warning System (NWS), the early-warning radar system the U.S. and Canada use to defend North America. It came online in the late 1980s when Cold War-era intercontinental ballistic missiles and strategic bombers were the primary means of conducting a long-range strike.

“Their cruise missiles that they’ve developed that can be employed from land, air, subsea, sea, are very low radar cross-section now,” VanHerck said. “They make our North Warning System look like a picket fence. It was designed for a 36,000-foot bomber back in the 70s and 80s timeframe, and now they can know where all those radars are and circumnavigate those.”

Russia is currently launching cruise missile attacks on Ukrainian cities. In response to questions from reporters Oct. 11 about pleas for air defense systems by the Ukrainian government, White House National Security Council strategic communications coordinator John Kirby noted that Russia uses long-range cruise missiles fired from bombers flying inside of Russian airspace, making the threat hard to address through air defense systems.

But that threat might exist for the United States as well.

“They can take off over Russian air bases today and launch their cruise missiles from over Russia and attack almost all of North America, including the United States of America,” VanHerck said.

The risk of undetected strikes is increasing from above and below as waters around the U.S. become more permissible due to melting ice caused by climate change. In addition, China and Russia have increased their presence in the Arctic. The White House has recognized its growing importance to national security with a new plan for the region with defense as the top priority, which VanHereck has previously championed.

“It’s the closest route to the homeland if you’re going to attack,” VanHerck said, referring to the route submarines could take over the North Pole, which “significantly reduces our decision space and timeline.”

That threat also exists outside the Arctic due to Russia’s sizeable nuclear-powered submarine fleet.

“That will be a persistent proximate threat capable of carrying a significant number of land attack cruise missiles that can threaten our homeland today,” VanHerck said.

Ultimately, the United States will always attempt to defend its territory. Deterring an attack on America is the main reason the U.S. has spent billions building a nuclear triad.

A July 2022 report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies argued that America lacked sufficient cruise missile defense and relied too much on the U.S. nuclear deterrent, creating “a vulnerability that near-peer adversaries are seeking to exploit.”

In the National Defense Strategy, China is defined as the “pacing” threat and Russia is an “acute” threat. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a flagrant example of Moscow’s willingness to take military action to achieve its aims. But Russia has long violated international norms and laws, from using chemical weapons to poison opponents abroad to interfering in other countries’ democratic elections.

While China’s rapidly growing military capabilities and increasingly aggressive international posture concern VanHerck, Russia is front of mind.

“I fought really hard to get the Russians in there candidly,” VanHerck said of the National Defense Strategy. “This was before their acts of Feb. 24” when the invasion of Ukraine began.

“They are a now threat to the homeland,” VanHerck added of Russia, repeating a theme he has tried to hammer home to policymakers. “They are the primary military threat to the homeland today when it comes to kinetic capabilities, and also non-kinetic.”

Russia already took action against the U.S. homeland by interfering in American elections, using various cyber means such as hacking and bots to influence outcomes or at least sow discord. Russia has also been blamed for conducting more aggressive cyber attacks against other countries’ infrastructure, including shutting down power grids.

“We’re under attack, folks, if you haven’t figured that out. What you see in social media—what you see fanned the flames of internal discord, whether it be politics or not,” VanHerck said.

If a nation launches weapons against the United States, conventional or nuclear,  VanHerck said global security could quickly spiral out of control if America cannot assess threats quickly and accurately.

“If you can’t detect a threat, I can’t provide continuity of government warning—I can’t provide warning to our nuclear force posture,” VanHerck said. “So you have to start making some assumptions. And those are significant threats, as well.”

“If we’re shooting down cruise missiles over Washington, D.C., or Ottawa, I think I’ve failed,” he added.

KC-135s Set Record With 72-Hour Endurance Mission

KC-135s Set Record With 72-Hour Endurance Mission

A pair of KC-135s from Fairchild Air Force Base, Wash., continuously operated for 72 hours, landing only to swap crews, refuel, and service engine oil while keeping at least one engine running at all times.

The mission, which took place from Oct. 4 to 7 and covered more than 36,000 miles—roughly one and a half times around the Earth. It set a new endurance record for the aircraft, far surpassing the previous mark of 40 hours, according to a press release from the 92nd Air Refueling Wing.

The KC-135s and crews that conducted the mission are part of the 92nd ARW, but they received help from Airmen in the 141st Air Refueling Wing, also at Fairchild; the 452nd Air Mobility Wing at March Air Reserve Base, Calif.; and the 134th Air Refueling Wing at McGhee Tyson Air National Guard Base, Tenn.

Over the course of those 72 hours, the tankers refueled B-2 and B-52 bombers, as well an E-3 Sentry and an E-6B Mercury. When they landed, crews conducted hot-pit refueling, and aircrews swapped out while maintenance Airmen conducted engine oil servicing.

By continuously operating for so long, the Airmen were able to practice techniques related to agile combat employment, the operational concept in which small teams move quickly and operate out of remote or austere locations.

“This was the first continuously operating 72-hour endurance mission for the KC-135,” Col. Chad Cisewski, 92nd Operations Group commander, said in a statement. “Part of the ACE concept is that aircraft will continue forward while spending minimal time on the ground. This mission is one example of Airmen utilizing ACE concepts the way they could be employed in the Pacific. I’m extremely proud of both our operations and maintenance team for their tireless work on this.”

Air Mobility Command, which oversees the tanker fleet, has increasingly emphasized both ACE and operations in the Indo-Pacific in its training missions. In May, a KC-46 from the 22nd Air Refueling Wing flew for more than 24 hours straight, setting an AMC record.

At AFA’s Air, Space & Cyber conference in September, AMC commander Gen. Mike Minihan laid out his “Mobility Manifesto,” pledging to push those efforts even further. His stated goals include studying the idea of reduced “skeleton” crews for the KC-46 and other aircraft and having the KC-46 fly 30-hour and 36-hour sorties. 

Such long flights and missions, covering massive distances, may be needed in the Indo-Pacific region, a vast area known for its “tyranny of distance.” The Air Force and the broader Pentagon have increasingly emphasized the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command area of responsibility as part of a pivot toward competition with China, and Minihan has said AMC’s Mobility Guardian 23 exercise will take place over the Pacific.

Col. Chesley Dycus, 92nd ARW commander, made reference to that upcoming exercise in detailing the benefits of the KC-135 endurance mission. 

“This took tenacity and exceptional teamwork to accomplish,” Dycus said in a statement. “The lessons learned here, and our readiness will only improve the wing’s ability to support AMC’s ‘crown jewel of mobility exercises’ Mobility Guardian in 2023 and demonstrate our critical capabilities in the Pacific.”

Dozens of Lawmakers Urge Pentagon to Move Forward With Adaptive Engines

Dozens of Lawmakers Urge Pentagon to Move Forward With Adaptive Engines

Nearly 50 members of Congress have urged Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III to fund a new phase of development for advanced fighter engines in the fiscal 2024 budget, sending a letter to the Pentagon on Oct. 7.

The letter, signed by 49 lawmakers from both the House and Senate, specifically requests that the Defense Department “fund adaptive propulsion engineering and manufacturing development in the FY24 budget submission and deliver adaptive technology to the services as quickly as possible.”

The Air Force has taken the lead in researching and testing adaptive engines through its Adaptive Engine Transition Program. Enginemakers GE Aerospace and Pratt & Whitney have developed three-stream prototypes that companies and USAF officials say could produce generational advances in propulsion. With the ability to maximize for thrust in combat situations and fuel efficiency in cruising conditions, such engines could increase range, acceleration, and thermal management.

The future of the program and the prototypes that came from it, however, are in doubt, tied to the controversy over the future of F-35 propulsion.

GE Aerospace has pitched its engine, the XA100, as a replacement for the F-35’s current engine, the F135, which has suffered from sustainment issues.

Pratt & Whitney, on the other hand, has pushed instead for an incremental “Enhanced Engine Package” upgrade to the F135, saying that the adaptive engines should be introduced with the service’s Next Generation Air Dominance fighter.

While some officials have touted the capabilities of the adaptive engines for the F-35, other observers have argued that the cost of installing them could be prohibitive, especially given that they will not fit on F-35Bs and the F-35 program is structured so that customers have to “pay to be different,” meaning the Air Force would not be able to share costs.

Congress, for its part, included language in the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act calling for AETP engines to be installed in F-35As starting in 2027, a move that would put pressure on the Air Force to shift AETP from a research, development, test, and evaluation phase into an engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) one.

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has seemingly indicated that the service will make a decision on an EMD phase—or ending the program completely—in the near future. On two occasions in recent months, he predicted a decision in the 2024 budget, at one point saying he doesn’t want to “limp along,” continuing to spend money on research and development for AETP.

“The Department of Defense has to make a decision overall about engine modifications and upgrades for the F-35. I expect that process to take place over the next few months as we build the [fiscal 2024] budget,” Kendall told lawmakers in May. “What the Air Force has funded is continuing the AETP technology development, but we’re going to need to have a decision at a higher level about the overall program for F-35 engine modifications and upgrades.”

That continuing technology development is seemingly nearing its end. In September, GE Aerospace announced that the XA100 had completed its final testing milestone as part of AETP, with the company saying in a press release that it was “ready to transition to an Engineering and Manufacturing Development program.”

In the letter to Austin, the bipartisan group of lawmakers don’t tip their hand in favor of either GE’s XA100 or Pratt & Whitney’s XA101. Instead, they ask that DOD include factors such as “capability and the cost of failure” in its budget analysis, hinting that monetary cost shouldn’t be the determining factor in a choice.

The lawmakers also link the future development of adaptive engines to the Defense Department’s top priority of competing with and deterring China.

“To support the administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, we must continue to develop and field advanced propulsion systems which will enable our service members to fly into the theater of operation, complete their mission and return home safely,” the lawmakers wrote.

In closing, the legislators also echo comments made in August by John Sneden, director of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s propulsion directorate, who warned that the U.S. was “starting to lose our lead” in propulsion.

“If we do not continue to pursue advanced propulsion systems for our fighter aircraft, we risk opening the door for U.S. adversaries to overtake our advantages in fielded engine technology,” the lawmakers wrote.

Among the 49 members of Congress who signed the letter are three members of the Senate Armed Services Committee—Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.), and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.); and the chair of the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).

Six members of the House Armed Services Committee signed on as well—Rep. Michael Turner (R-Ohio), Rep. Robert Wittman (R-Va.), Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), Rep. Jerry Carl (R-Ala.), Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), and Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.).

With Pentagon Waiver, Deliveries Resume of New F-35s With Chinese Magnets

With Pentagon Waiver, Deliveries Resume of New F-35s With Chinese Magnets

Deliveries of new F-35 fighters have resumed after halting in September following the discovery that a Chinese-sourced material was used in building the aircraft. The resumption of deliveries, ordered by Pentagon acquisition chief William A. LaPlante, went into effect Oct. 8 and extends through delivery of Lot 14, or about the next 126 of the fighters. However, parts without the Chinese material will be installed on F-35s as early as November.

The part involved was a magnet in a turbomachinery element supplied to F-35 builder Lockheed Martin by Honeywell. It contained a magnet made of cobalt and samarium, an alloy sourced from China, prohibited under acquisition regulations. The Pentagon previously said the part is incapable of transmitting any data about the F-35, nor does it endanger aircraft already delivered with the alloy. Aircraft already delivered will not have to have their magnets replaced.

The turbomachine “integrates the functionality of an auxiliary power unit [APU] and an air cycle machine into a single piece of equipment,” Lockheed Martin said when the improperly-sourced material came to light.

When the part acts as an APU “it provides electrical power for ground maintenance, main engine start, and emergency power. It also provides compressed air for the thermal management system during ground maintenance,” the company said.

Through a spokesperson, LaPlante said he had signed a National Security Waiver “that allows DoD to accept Lot 13 and Lot 14 F-35 aircraft containing non-compliant specialty metals” in the Honeywell mechanism.

Acceptance of F-35s is necessary due to “national security interests,” LaPlante said, and the waiver applies to “a total of 126 F-35 aircraft awaiting delivery or to be delivered under the Lot 12-14 production contract.” The last airplane under the Lot 12-14 buy is to be delivered by Oct. 31, 2023.

Despite the lack of danger, the DOD decided in September to stop accepting the airplanes because of a possible violation of the DFAR, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation that prohibits parts critical for major weapon systems to be sourced from potentially hostile nations. LaPlante’s waiver clears that potential hurdle. He telegraphed the move in a Sept. 9 discussion with reporters.

Lockheed Martin, in an Oct. 8 statement, reiterated that the magnet “does not provide any visibility or access to sensitive program information” and poses no safety of flight issue. Honeywell has identified a different source for the material, and the new vendor’s alloy will be installed on aircraft beginning next month.

During the delivery pause, 18 airplanes were held up, and Lockheed Martin expects they will have their DD-250 official acceptance forms signed this week.

“Prior to the pause, we had delivered 88 aircraft of our scheduled 148-153 F-35s to be delivered in 2022,” the company said.

The company noted that it manages a supplier base of more than 1,700 contractors, “with an annual domestic economic impact of approximately $72 billion.” The company said it’s “committed to supplier standards and contractual requirements” in delivering the F-35.

Government sources said they did not expect the situation to interfere with contracts in the Lot 15-17 acquisition of F-35s.

Coincidentally, the first—and only—cobalt mine in the U.S. opened Oct. 7 near Salmon, Idaho. Operated by the Jervois Global company, based in Australia, the new entirely underground mine is near an abandoned open-pit cobalt mine which has not produced in decades. Assembled dignitaries at the opening said the mine would create an American source for cobalt, necessary for a wide variety of applications, such as electric car batteries.