Robins AFB Finishes Environmental Reviews, Clearing Way for New Missions

Robins AFB Finishes Environmental Reviews, Clearing Way for New Missions

Robins Air Force Base, Ga., has completed two environmental reviews, clearing the way for new construction to support the bases four new missions sets, which will replace the E-8 Joint STARS mission that has defined the base for decades.

Robins’s transition from the E-8 Sentry has been in the works for more than a year. In June 2021, the Air Force announced those aircraft will retire and four new mission sets would be assigned there: a Battle Management Control squadron, an E-11A Battlefield Airborne Communication Node (BACN) squadron, a Spectrum Warfare group, and support units focused on the Advanced Battle Management System and Joint All-Domain Command and Control.  

Leaders have promised Robins population would remain steady despite the changes. Congress has supported the JSTARS divestment, in contrast to earlier attempts that were blocked with the help of the Georgia delegation.  The Air Force plans to retire eight JSTARS aircraft in 2023 and four more 2024, leaving just four of the aircraft after that. 

The first E-11A BACN aircraft will arrive in the spring of 2023 and reach full operational capability by 2027; the Battle Management Control Squadron will begin to stand up in 2023 and reach FOC by fiscal 2025. 

Also down the line, the 950th Spectrum Warfare Group headquarters is set to be activated in 2027, and construction on a new Battle Management Combined Operations Center is currently in a design review phase. 

“This next chapter archives the first-of-its-kind Total Force Integrated Wing tasked with 22 years of continuous global overwatch and begins building the foundations for new Georgia Air National Guard missions, ensuring a bright future for Team Robins,” said Col. Christopher Dunlap, 116th Air Control Wing commander, in a statement. “These four new missions will be essential elements of our National Defense Strategy for many years to come and I am excited our Georgia Air Guard men and women are at the forefront.” 

Troops Will See Record Food Allowance Increase In 2023

Troops Will See Record Food Allowance Increase In 2023

The Basic Allowance for Subsistence will rise 11.2 percent effective January 1, ringing in the new year with big increases for ever service member. The new enlisted rate is $452.56 per month, while the rate for officers reaches $311.68. That’s the biggest year-over-year increase since 2002, when the Defense Department completed an overhaul of BAS rules.  

Enlisted members will pocketabout $45 more each month, and officers will get an extra $31, marking the first time officers’ BAS exceeded $300. 

BAS is adjusted annually to match the USDA food cost index. Food prices rose 10.9 percent from October 2021 to October 2022, and are projected to increase between 9.5 to 10.5 percent for the calendar year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s most recent data.

Inflation in the year ahead remains a mystery. Officials had expected it to slow in 2023, with the Consumer Price Index closer to historic averages, but some industry officials are warning that high food inflation is unlikely to go away soon. Eggs, dairy products, poultry, and processed fruits and vegetables have seen the highest spikes. 

Pentagon leaders have increasingly emphasized the need for higher pay and allowances for military personnel. The 2023 budget request included a 4.6 percent pay raise, the largest in two decades, and officials anticipate higher housing allowances, as well. The proposal also included a new “basic needs allowance” that would give extra cash to service members’ whose pay is less than 130 percent of the federal poverty guidelines of the Department of Health and Human Services. Congress has yet to finalize action on the 2023 budget and the Pentagon is currently operting on a continuing resolution, which expires Dec. 16. Congress must either approve a budget or another CR by that date.

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall hammered home care for “people” in his address to Airmen and Guardians at AFA’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference in September—noting among other things he was reversing planned cuts to special duty pays that had generated controversy because they came amid rising inflation. Likewise, Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass said she was pushing for a “holistic military compensation review” to identify ways to more quickly respond to rising costs. 

Basic Allowance for Subsistence Over Time

YEAROFFICERENLISTEDPERCENTAGE CHANGE
2023$311.68$452.5611.20
2022$280.29$406.985.30
2021$266.18$386.503.70
2020$256.68$372.710.90
2019$254.39$369.390.00
2018$254.39$369.390.30
2017$253.63$368.290.00
2016$253.63$368.290.10
2015$253.38$367.922.90
2014$246.24$357.551.50
2013$242.60$352.271.10
2012$239.96$348.447.20
2011$223.84$325.040.36
2010$223.04$323.870.00
2009$223.04$323.8710.00
2008$202.76$294.435.20
2007$192.74$279.882.80
2006$187.49$272.261.90
2005$183.99$267.185.00
2004$175.23$254.464.80
2003$167.20$242.810.50
2002$166.37$241.60
Air Force Working on Fuel-Saving, 3D-Printed ‘Microvanes’ for C-17

Air Force Working on Fuel-Saving, 3D-Printed ‘Microvanes’ for C-17

The Air Force is considering making aerodynamic retrofits to one of its flagship cargo planes in an effort to save on fuel and be kinder to the environment.

As part of a project that has been in the works for years, the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and Air Force Life Cycle Management Center are in the process of airworthiness certification to fit microvanes on C-17s. Microvanes are small fin-like additions that attach to the fuselage to reduce drag. The Air Force says fitting the parts to the existing fleet could save millions of dollars per year in fuel.

“This is a great step forward on an existing aircraft for fuel efficiency and mission enhancement,” Ed Clark, an AFRL engineer, told Air & Space Forces Magazine in an email.

The microvanes are a prime example of “bringing modern technologies forward on an older aircraft,” said Clark, a member of the Future Force Energy office at AFRL’s Materials and Manufacturing Directorate.

Clark said AFRL first began working on the technology in 2014 and that work to fit microvanes to C-17s began in 2015.

Microvanes were originally developed by Lockheed Martin in collaboration with the Air Force. They are commercially available for C-130 and have already been installed on some Canadian Armed Forces aircraft of the type. In 2021, the Department of Defense awarded a contract to Metro Aerospace, which holds the license to Lockheed Martin’s patent on the technology, to explore putting microvanes on Air Force’s C-130s and “help validate drag-reduction concepts that can be developed and applied to commercial aircraft, other aircraft such as the C-17, KC-135, and future vertical lift.”

The C-17 microvanes are fin-shaped structures that attach to the aft of the fuselage. Cargo planes have historically had high drag in that area because of upsweep in the fuselage required for the rear cargo door, which microvanes can help reduce, according to a Lockheed Martin study.

The Air Force Research Laboratory says it took several new steps in the development of the microvanes so they could be tested with limited interruption in the service’s fleet of around 220 aircraft. C-17s have been sometimes been stretched thin and required to conduct massive airlift operations on little notice. The AFRL team sought to minimize disruption to the fleet.

The team used Computational Flow Dynamics (CFD) to help design, test, and evaluate the efficiency of the parts. The microvanes are 3D-printed from DuraForm GF/DuraForm ProX GF composite material, reducing the complexity required when producing and fitting them to the aircraft.

Modern design tools allowed the the team to make “a safe and integral gain to the aircraft while not impacting operations,” Clark said. “This is a 3D-printed device which can be installed in a short amount of time utilizing Air Force aircraft maintenance personnel.”

By reducing drag, the Air Force can save fuel by reducing the workload of the engines. C-17s with microvanes installed save around one percent in fuel over regular C-17s, according to the service. The Air Force says those savings are significant if added up over the fleet.

“When installed across the C-17 fleet, including Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve aircraft, the Air Force estimates the microvanes will pay for themselves in fuel savings in seven months and save over $10 million per year,” according to a release from the office of the Assistant Secretary of Air Force for Energy, Installations, and Environment.

Clark said the microvanes program has cost approximately $5 million so far to develop. AFRL hopes to complete airworthiness certification soon on C-17s.

“Our goal is calendar year 2023 with added flight verification and in service testing in the first half of the year,” Clark said.

In 2023, “the Air Force will determine the best option for production of the microvanes for the C-17 fleet,” he added.

DNI Skeptical Russia Can Reconstitute Effectively for Spring Offensive

DNI Skeptical Russia Can Reconstitute Effectively for Spring Offensive

Russia’s ability to refit and reconstitute for an expected spring offensive in Ukraine is in some doubt, because of its inability to domestically produce the weapons it is using, according to Avril Haines, the Director of National Intelligence. But she also doesn’t see any evidence that Vladimir Putin will give up his ambitions of “controlling” Ukraine.

In a Dec. 3 interview with NBC’s Andrea Mitchell at the Reagan Defense Forum in Simi Valley, Calif., attended by Air & Space Forces Magazine, Haines said U.S. intelligence expects the current “reduced tempo” of the Ukraine conflict, with Russia withdrawn to the far eastern portions of the country, to continue into the spring.

“Then, once you get past the winter the … question is: what will the counteroffensive look like?” Haines said.

The intelligence community expects both Ukraine and Russia to go into a “refit, resupply, … reconstitute” mode, “so they’re prepared for the counteroffensive.” However, “we actually have a fair amount of skepticism as to whether or not the Russians will be, in fact, prepared to do that,” Haines said. Rather, she is more optimistic for the Ukrainians.

Russia’s stockpile of weapons is in question, Haines explained.

“I can’t give you precise numbers in this forum, but … it’s really pretty extraordinary, and our own sense is that they are not capable of indigenously producing what they are expending, at this stage.”

That’s why Russia has been “going to other countries … to try to get ammunition and … we’ve indicated that their precision munitions are running out much faster [than that of the Ukrainians] in many respects.” Russia is known to have solicited weapons from North Korea, China and Iran, which would be compatible with Russian systems because their original design was Russian.

So far, Russia has not gotten “a lot” of artillery from its client states, she said.

The size of Russia’s weapon stockpiles and how much is available for them “to use in different conflicts … are obviously all questions that we look at quite carefully with our allies and partners,” Haines said, hinting that Russia may have significantly limited military options for conventional action beyond Ukraine.

Haines is not certain that Russian President Vladimir Putin truly understands what’s happening in Ukraine and may be getting sugar-coated reports from underlings unwilling to anger him.

“This has obviously been an issue that’s been discussed pretty widely. … What I can say is, I think Putin was surprised by his military’s … lack of performance” in Ukraine, Haines offered.

“I do think he is becoming more informed of the challenges that the military faces in Russia, but it’s still not clear to us that he has a full picture at this stage of just how challenged they are,” with regard to “shortages of ammunition, … morale, supply issues, logistics, a whole series of concerns that they’re facing.”

While Putin’s grasp of Russia’s poor status in the war may only now be dawning on him, he’s not changing his plans, Haines said.

“He has not changed his political objectives; at least we don’t see evidence of that,” she said.

If his objective is to retake control of Ukraine, “there are a lot of interpretations of what that means,” Haines added—Putin continues to say Ukraine is part of Russia’s sovereign territory, but “what does that mean for his near-term military objectives? Are they going to be as expansive as they were at the beginning? Or does he at some point recognize that he’s incapable of doing what it is he intended to, originally, and … downscale what it is that he’s willing to accept?”

American intelligence believes “he may be willing to do that on a temporary basis with the idea that he might then come back at this issue at a later time.”

Haines said that Russia’s campaign of strikes at Ukraine’s power infrastructure may be hurting, but isn’t having the desired effect of breaking the country’s will to resist.

“As we watch … the population fight for their country and then see the just outrageous illegal attack on civilian infrastructure, such as the grid [and] gas … heating [and] a variety of other things … we’re not seeing any evidence” of Ukrainian will to resist “undermined … at this point.” The strikes are also calculated to “affect Ukraine’s capacity to … prosecute conflict,” which may have an effect long-term, especially on Ukraine’s economy, which is “obviously suffering very badly.”

Iran has given or sold unmanned aircraft to Russia and has ham-handedly tried to avoid responsibility for the results, Haines said. Iran first denied it, then “said, ‘Well, these were given before the war’ … They had a variety of different excuses.” Russia is also seeking other kinds of precision munitions from Iran, she said. “That will be very concerning,” she added, but declined to discuss the issue further.

Haines declined to offer estimates of Russian casualties but said both sides are taking fewer losses as the pace of operations slows.

As to China’s role in supporting Russia, Haines said President Xi has been trying to “play … both sides of this game. … They are continuing to work with Russia on a variety of things. They continue to … have meetings, find ways to support [Russia] in international fora to help them manage … efforts to expose what the Russians are doing or provide condemnation. And they are providing different forms of assistance.”

While China has not provided Russia “anything that is determinative of military assistance, … there are things on the margins … [that] concern us and we’ll obviously keep watching this.” She added that there’s “no evidence” that China has been responsible for reigning in Putin’s recent rhetoric on using nuclear weapons.

However, “I think it is fair to say, from our perspective, that Xi’s voice on this is going to be obviously among the most compelling to Putin on this issue.”

Asked if Putin’s position is becoming more precarious, with more outspoken protests about the war—some even coming from oligarchs—Haines said, “we’ve seen increasing … dissent among the elites,” big-city mayors and “more significant figures in Russia” offering “more critical views of the war … than you have in the past.” However, none of it “amounts to likely regime change.”

The dissent from the elites “could shape some of his decision-making,” and the U.S. is trying to understand this dynamic better, she said. Protests in the street don’t seem to influence Putin, she added.

Report: F-16 Pilot Violated Air Force Rules While Intercepting Civilian Aircraft Before Crash

Report: F-16 Pilot Violated Air Force Rules While Intercepting Civilian Aircraft Before Crash

A pilot incorrectly believed he had lost control of his F-16 when he ejected from it over western Louisiana this past March, resulting in the destruction of the $27 million aircraft, according to a new Accident Investigation Board report. 

The report also faulted the pilot and the flight lead accompanying him during the training exercise for failing to follow Air Force rules and regulations as they attempted to intercept a civilian aircraft that was not participating in the exercise.

The March 23 crash did not result in any serious injuries to the pilot, a member of the 138th Fighter Wing of the Oklahoma Air National Guard.

According to the report, the incident took place during a routine exercise for two F-16s taking off from Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base, Texas, to practice an Aerospace Control Alert (ACA) as part of a NORAD mission as well as air-to-air refueling.

During the training exercise, however, the two F-16s encountered a civilian aircraft that was in an established hold with a nearby regional airport.

Without contacting the civilian aircraft or the air traffic control agency, the flight lead pilot directed an unplanned low-and-slow visual identification intercept of the aircraft, in violation of Air Force training rules that require such intercepts to be coordinated beforehand so the aircraft being intercepted won’t maneuver.

“As a result, the [civilian] aircraft conducting an instrument holding pattern at Beauregard Regional Airport resulted in multiple unpredictable turns. … These uncoordinated turns further increased the level of difficulty for the [F-16s] during their intercept,” the report author states.

As the two F-16s performed the intercept, both pilots flew slower than the minimum airspeed training requirements for that altitude. The flight lead was able to identify five of the six digits in the civilian aircraft’s tail number. The second pilot then approached aircraft to read the last digit, but in doing so closed to within 300 feet of it, again violating Air Force training regulations. 

As the second pilot completed the intercept, he went to raise his F-16’s trailing edge flaps using the Alternate Flaps switch in the cockpit. In doing so, however, he inadvertently flipped the switch for his fighter’s Digital Backup, located next to the Alternate Flaps switch. That caused the F-16 “flight control laws [to] default to their false (not active) state, irrespective of the actual airspeed,” per the report. 

The trailing edge flaps began retracting, an action that was “normal and indicative of a correctly operating flight control system” when the DBU switch has been flipped. But it caused the F-16 to shudder, and the pilot took that to mean the aircraft had “departed controlled flight,” leading to him decide to eject. 

The time between the pilot flipping the wrong switch and the initiation of the ejection was brief—just four seconds, according to the report. 

After that, the F-16 crashed in a sparsely wooded area, impacting the ground “in a steep, slow, upright approach and possible rotation,” according to an analysis. An image included in the report shows the remains of the fighter at the crash site, with only a few pieces of the aircraft still easily identifiable. 

The AIB report determined that the main cause of the crash was the pilot’s “failure to effectively maintain positive control of the [aircraft] throughout the low speed, low altitude environment,” specifically pointing to his flipping of the DBU switch and lack of familiarity with the F-16’s handling characteristics leading to his mistaken belief that the aircraft was out of control. 

On top of that, the report said the pilot and flight lead’s decision to involve a non-participating civilian aircraft in a training exercise substantially contributed to the crash, as did their failure to follow Air Force regulations governing airspeed, separation between aircraft, and pre-flight briefings on the training mission. 

More broadly, the report author found in interviewing witnesses from the 138th FW’s Detachment 1 at Ellington Field that many members of the squadron didn’t have the necessary understanding “as to whether performing low/slow VID intercepts against nonparticipating and uncoordinated aircraft is a permitted practice.” 

An image of the F-16 crash site in western Louisiana included in the Accident Investigation Board report. U.S. Air Force photo
F-22s Leave Poland, Head Home to Alaska After NATO Deployment

F-22s Leave Poland, Head Home to Alaska After NATO Deployment

F-22 Raptors are leaving Europe after a four-month deployment, U.S. Air Forces in Europe said. The stealth fifth-generation fighters were sent to NATO’s Eastern Flank in July and mainly operated out of Poland, conducting air policing missions in response to Russia’s renewed invasion of Ukraine. F-15E Strike Eagles from RAF Lakenheath, U.K., have taken over the air policing mission out of Poland as of Nov. 29, U.S. Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) said. A spokesperson for USAFE said the F-22s are “transitioning” back to their home base.

It was a busy deployment for members of 90th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. In addition to operating out of Lask Air Base in Poland for the air policing mission, they supported NATO’s Steadfast Noon tactical nuclear exercise. They also deployed to the Greek island of Crete and to Norway in what the Air Force said were examples of agile combat employment (ACE), the service’s plan for more distributed operations.

The F-22s have deployed to hotspots before, conducting multiple deployments to the Middle East in 2022. The deployment of American fifth-generation air power to Poland was part of America’s increased presence in Europe in the wake of Russia’s renewed invasion of Ukraine. Poland sits just to the east of Ukraine and is also hosting U.S. ground troops.

F-15E Strike Eagles from the 492nd Fighter Squadron—the “Bolars” and “Madhatters”—have taken the F-22s’ place at the Polish Air Force base.

The Air Force has a limited number of F-22s to go around, with about 180 in service, and plans to start sunsetting the plane in the 2030s. F-22s from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson recently deployed to Kadena Air Base in Japan on a rotational basis as the Air Force begins to remove aging F-15Cs that have been stationed there.

The departure of the F-22 from Europe means no American fifth-generation fighters are conducting NATO air policing missions, though fifth-generation F-35s Lightning IIs are in the region based at RAF Lakenheath. Those aircraft, from the 495th Fighter Squadron, or “Valkyries,” recently deployed to Italy for a two-week-long combat training exercise, along with allied F-35s. A USAFE spokesperson pointed to that exercise as an example of the significant air power that remains in the region.

Other air policing missions underwent changes coinciding with the turn of the month. Polish F-16s, augmented by French Rafales, recently took over the lead of NATO’s Baltic air policing mission from the Hungarian Air Force.

Since February’s renewed Russian invasion, NATO has further enhanced its air policing missions.

Gen. James B. Hecker, the head of U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa and NATO’s Allied Air Command, has emphasized more than just air policing.

NATO conducts training missions that simulate attacks on ground-based air defenses and missile defense exercises. Aircraft from France, Spain, Turkey, and the U.S. recently conducted a test with a French air defense system in Romania.

“We have combat air patrols in the air, with live weapons, as a deterrent to Russia. But we don’t want to just do that. Because if you just do that, you’re just doing circles in the sky, and you get very inproficient,” Hecker said at AFA’s Air, Space, & Cyber Conference in September. “As we move forward, the new normal is going to be a lot of practicing with other nations … on missions that we’re going to have to do should Russia decide to attack a neighbor.”

Eight Features That Show the New Raider is Not the B-2.1

Eight Features That Show the New Raider is Not the B-2.1

The unveiling of the new B-21 bomber was staged to keep many of its innovations under wraps, but more than 34 years of technological advances since the B-2’s 1988 rollout were clearly in evidence.

A senior Northrop Grumman official, briefing reporters before the Dec. 2 rollout of the B-21, called the aircraft “the most advanced stealth aircraft ever built,” with heavy emphasis on making it a “daily flyer,” meaning its maintenance has been streamlined such that it can perform multiple sorties per day without extensive touchups of its stealth features.

Although the official said the majority of what makes the B-21 a “sixth-generation” combat aircraft is “on the inside,” a number of external features point to its evolution from the technology of the B-2, which is also a stealthy flying wing.    

1. Intakes

Perhaps the most striking features of the B-21 are its slender, barely-there air intakes. Unlike the higher-rise, scalloped intakes on the B-2, the B-21’s are almost organically a part of its wing root. That’s good for stealth—radar loves abrupt angles and big cavities—but the intakes are so thin and shallow,  they seem hardly big enough to swallow enough air to feed the B-21’s engines.

However, a leading aerodynamicist told Air & Space Forces Magazine that “as long as you have enough inlet area to accept the required mass flow of air, your engines will work fine.”

The “real trick,” he said, “is designing an inlet that can handle the distortions and gradients caused by the fact that the air is moving over significant surface area of the inlet before being ingested. That’s more a matter of tailoring the channel shape in the inlet.”

Magnification of images released by the Air Force of the B-21 show a vertical vane in the inlet.

Having the inlet close to the leading edge could also make use of the “Kutta effect,” he said: “the tendency of a fluid to remain attached to a surface rather than separating.” Oversimplified, that means that air moving up and over the leading edge of the wing would flow directly into the inlet, instead of up and over the inlet itself.  

The advantage of such slender inlets is that there is less of a cavity for search radars to find, and even less chance of detecting the B-21’s engine fan blades, which are a huge radar reflector. On the B-2, the engines are hidden behind serpentine ducting that shields them from direct view.

In 2018, at a McAleese/Credit Suisse conference, Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.), in an unusual disclosure of progress on the classified program, said the B-21 was largely on track but had suffered some setbacks with engine airflow.

“This is a very, very different design as far as airflow,” Wittman revealed at the time, “and there have been some design challenges there.”

There were differences of opinion between engine contractor Pratt & Whitney and the “ducting contractor,” Wittman said, with the latter complaining, “‘There’s only so much air we can move through there,’ and Pratt & Whitney says, ‘No, we need a certain amount of air to go through the front of the engine.’ Then the question is: How do you do that? Do you split [the difference] between the two?”

Pratt & Whitney wanted more air at the inlet, but that would have affected the low-observable design, Wittman reported.

The engine and ducting all have to work together, Wittman observed, adding that “all those things are elements that you would normally expect in an aircraft that’s new, that takes a concept from B-2, refines and uses it on this platform.”

2. Size

Despite persistent rumors—and some defense official comments—that the B-21 would be substantially smaller than the B-2, that was not apparent at the rollout. A rough approximation of the wingspan, made possible by the presence of a B-2 at a Northrop Grumman aircraft a few feet away, suggests the wingspan of the B-21 is perhaps only 22 feet or so shorter than that of the B-2, which would indicate a span of about 150 feet. However, this estimation is fraught because the angle of wing sweepback on the B-21 may be deeper than that of the B-2. A close encounter with the draped B-21 minutes before the unveiling indicated it may have a deeper sweep angle than the B-21, but whether it has a “cranked” or bent shape was unclear.

The B-21 Raider was unveiled to the public at a ceremony Dec. 2, 2022, in Palmdale, Calif. Screenshot

3. Depth

The B-21 has a decidedly deeper and broader keel than the B-2, implying larger weapons bays and potentially more internal fuel. Like the B-2, the B-21 will operate from continental U.S. bases, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III said in his rollout remarks. The aircraft overall, however, clearly sits on its landing gear higher than the B-2 does. The gear are also two-wheel bogeys rather than the four-wheel bogeys on the B-2.

4. Smoothness

While Herculean efforts were made to make the B-2 as smooth as possible—to thwart radar pickups of seams, panel lines, and protruding fastener heads—the B-21 gave the appearance of an almost sanded-smooth finish, with no shadows or breaks, even at the edges of its canopy. Northrop Grumman officials said the B-21 program has thoroughly dispensed with the methods used on the B-2, such as tape and caulk, to smooth out those breaks in the surface. The B-2’s skin is also designed to be resilient enough that the aircraft can make multiple sorties per day in full stealth mode, whereas the B-2 needed low-observable touch-ups after ever mission. Company officials at the rollout said the B-2 has benefitted from techniques used on the B-21 to reduce the use of tape and improve the aircraft’s stealth resiliency.

5. Cockpit Transparencies

Unlike the B-2’s four-window wrap-around windscreen, the B-21 has an unusual geometry of two trapezoidal forward windows and two long side widows. The edges of the windows seemed thoroughly contiguous with the airplane’s solid surfaces; no seams, edges or framing seemed in evidence. Coupled with the B-21’s deeper keel, the impression of a “flying saucer” is pronounced, though surely unintentional.

B-21
The B-21 Raider was unveiled to the public at a ceremony Dec. 2, 2022, in Palmdale, Calif. Air Force photo.

6. Gear Doors

The landing gear doors on the B-21 are more simplified than the serrated-edge doors on the B-2. The “tail code” of ED—for Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., where testing will take place—appeared on the main gear doors, just as the tail codes of Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., appear on the B-2’s gear doors. The first B-21 bears the serial “00001.” Stenciled on the aircraft just below the nose of the B-21 is the stylized wing symbol of Northrop Grumman flight test.

7. ‘Hawk’s Beak’

The B-2 has a pronounced “beak” at the very tip of its leading edge. A brief side view of the B-21 at the rollout showed that feature also exists on the new bomber, though it is set further ahead of the windscreen and is longer and flatter.

The B-21 Raider was unveiled to the public at a ceremony December 2, 2022 in Palmdale, Calif. Designed to operate in tomorrow’s high-end threat environment, the B-21 will play a critical role in ensuring America’s enduring airpower capability. U.S. Air Force photo

8. Color

While the B-2 wears wrap-around FS 36118 “Gunship Gray” paint with variations around taped areas, effective for night operations, the B-21 wears an overall light gray, possibly FS36375 “Light Compass Ghost Gray,” which may aid in reducing its visual and infrared signature in the daytime.

More details of the B-21 are not expected for some time. The tail of the aircraft was not visible at the rollout, and program officials said they plan to keep that area under wraps as long as possible.

However, the reason for the B-21 being rolled out at this time is that it will soon be performing outside-the-factory engine runs and taxi tests, meaning it will be publicly visible, if at a distance. Once that happens, long telephoto images from photographers camped out on public land outside Plant 42 in Palmdale, Calif., will doubtlessly begin to appear, confirming or debunking initial speculation. The first flight of the B-21 is expected in mid-2023.

Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III delivers remarks at the U.S. Air Force B-21 Raider unveiling ceremony, Palmdale, Calif., Dec. 2, 2022. DOD photos by Chad J. McNeeley
‘The Decisive Decade’: Secretary Austin’s Remarks at the Reagan Forum

‘The Decisive Decade’: Secretary Austin’s Remarks at the Reagan Forum

‘The Decisive Decade’: Complete remarks by Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III at the Reagan National Defense Forum, Dec. 3, 2022, in Simi Valley, Calif.

Good morning, everyone.

Peggy, thank you so much for that very kind introduction. The Reagan Foundation and Institute has been a great host—but you know, it feels a little unfair to be expected to give a speech after Peggy Noonan.

[Laughter]

And as you pointed out, Peggy, the last time that we saw each other was actually in Iraq, in a dusty conference room in a palace in Baghdad. So this, indeed, is a bit nicer. And I’m delighted to be here.

I’m delighted to be here with an outstanding delegation from the Department of Defense, including Secretary Wormuth, Secretary Del Toro, and Secretary Kendall.

[Applause]

As well as members of the Joint Chiefs, combatant commanders, and more. So let’s give the Joint Chiefs and the combatant commanders a round of applause.

[Applause]

We also have a distinguished bipartisan delegation here from the United States Congress. And I always appreciate your constructive partnership. And I’m confident that we’ll keep coming together to keep America secure—including the passing of a full-year omnibus appropriation.

[Applause]

And I look forward to working with you in the coming weeks, and in the 118th Congress.

I’m honored to see ambassadors and defense ministers from allied and partner countries. So, welcome.

Now, it’s already been a very productive trip to California. Yesterday was a proud day for our country and for the United States Air Force.

I was in Palmdale to participate in the historic unveiling of the B-21 Raider. That’s the long-range strike stealth bomber that will soon be the backbone of the Air Force bomber fleet. The B-21 was developed over seven years by our partners at Northrop Grumman. So it was a really proud day for Kathy [Warden]—and very well done, by the way.

And it shows that we’re clear-eyed about what it’s going to take to keep America secure in the 21st century.

You see, the B-21 is an extraordinary display of combat power—and a major advance for American deterrence.

And making this bomber required harnessing the driving forces of American innovation and ingenuity—and drawing on both free minds and free enterprise.

Ladies and gentlemen, only one country on Earth consistently delivers that combination.

And that’s the United States of America.

[Applause]

American power, innovation, and values make the U.S. military the strongest fighting force in human history.

And make no mistake: We’re going to keep it that way.

[Applause]

And so our job is simple. And we don’t lose focus because of polls or politics. The U.S. military is here to fight and win our nation’s wars. And we will always work to deter conflict whenever we can. But if we are forced to defend ourselves, we will win—and we will win beyond doubt.

Now, as President Biden has said, we stand in “a decisive decade.”

And these next few years will set the terms of our competition with the People’s Republic of China. And they will shape the future of security in Europe. And they will determine whether our children and grandchildren inherit an open world of rules and rights—or whether they face emboldened autocrats who seek to dominate by force and fear.

As some of you may know, I was at the Halifax International Security Forum in Canada two weeks ago.

And I was introduced to a brave young Ukrainian soldier. And we spoke briefly about what she’d seen in her fight to defend her country.

The next day, I saw that young soldier again. And she was weeping because six of her brothers and sisters in arms had been killed overnight by Russian forces.

And through her tears, she presented me with a Ukrainian flag signed by some of the fighters who liberated the city of Kherson.

And she told me that the next day, she was headed back to Ukraine to rejoin the fight.

And so, ladies and gentlemen, that’s what is at stake in this decisive decade.

So let me reaffirm a basic American truth: In the struggle between those fighting to defend democracy and those bent on imperial aggression, the United States stands with the forces of freedom.

We are determined to use American power to defend our great democracy—and to bend the arc of history toward liberty.

And I am confident that America is up for the great competitions ahead.

You know, President Reagan liked to tell the story of an elderly British woman whose home was bombed during the Blitz of London. And when the rescuers arrived, they found a bottle of brandy that she had stored behind her staircase, which was the only thing still left standing. And so she was barely conscious, and one of the rescue workers pulled the cork out of the bottle to give her a taste of the brandy.

And she came around and immediately said, “Hey—put it back. That’s for emergencies.”

[Laughter]

Now, that’s the spirit that we need.

This is no time to hold back on our resources or our resolve.

To meet this moment, we’re going to need help from Congress, industry, and more. And I hope that you will join us in this mighty task.

To shape this decisive decade, we’re driving hard to further strengthen America’s deterrence.

We’re taking on the generational pacing challenge posed by the People’s Republic of China.

And we’re tackling the acute threat of Putin’s Russia—and defending the rules-based international order that keeps us all secure.

And we’re going to do all of this the American way—by drawing on the full force of American innovation and American industry to ensure that we get our war fighters what they need before they need it.

At this hinge in history, we’re carrying forward the great American tradition of strong, principled global leadership—alongside our stalwart allies and valued partners—in the service of human freedom.

So let’s start with American deterrence.

It lies at the core of the National Defense Strategy that guides the Department.

We’ve got the right strategy and the right operational concepts—and they’re driving us to make the right investments for our war fighters.

So we’re upgrading and honing and strengthening our armed forces for a changing world, even as we shore up the strong foundation that has kept us secure for decades.

Because in our imperfect world, deterrence does come through strength.

And we will continue to make clear to any potential foe the folly of aggression against the United States—at any time or any place, in any theater or any domain.

[Applause]

Deterrence means air power. So in our Fiscal Year 2023 budget, the Department has requested more than $56 billion for air power, focused on the F-35 and F-15EX fighters, the B-21 bomber, mobility aircraft, and unmanned systems. And American air power helps deter conflict every day, from joint exercises with our Indo-Pacific partners to aerial drills with our allies to protect NATO’s eastern flank.

Deterrence means sea power. So we’re investing in the new construction of nine battle-force ships and our Columbia-class ballistic-missile submarines. And just last month, one of our Ford-class nuclear-powered carriers made its first transit to Europe. 

Deterrence means long-range fires, like the HIMARS systems that have been so crucial to Ukraine’s self-defense.

Long-range fires will be vital for contingencies in the Indo-Pacific as well. So we’re investing in land-based hypersonic missile batteries and an air-launched hypersonic cruise missile. And the USS Zumwalt will become the first Navy platform to field hypersonics.

Deterrence means cutting-edge capabilities in domains where 21st-century conflicts could erupt, including space and cyberspace.

And finally, deterrence means a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal as the ultimate backstop to deter strategic attacks on our country and our allies, including NATO, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. And so that’s why our FY 2023 budget includes $34 billion to continue modernizing our nuclear triad and to bolster our nuclear command, control, and communications.

You know, when you add that up, that’s a lot.

But we’ve got more to do.

So let me urge Congress to pass an on-time appropriation so that we can get the capabilities to further strengthen our deterrence.

Now, to compete in this decisive decade, we’ve sharpened the Department’s focus on our primary theater of operations, which is the Indo-Pacific.

And we’re working to be able to mobilize and deploy American troops more quickly—and investing in military construction, and logistics, and infrastructure across the region.

We’ve requested billions to modernize the Marines into a highly mobile expeditionary force.

To maneuver better in the critical First Island Chain, we’re investing in nimble new groupings, like the Army’s Multi-Domain Task Forces.

And as we strengthen our deterrence, we’re fortified by the allies and partners who share our values.

Here’s one simple military truth: Our allies and partners are a phenomenal force multiplier. And as Margaret Thatcher once said, we will not stay free for long if we have no allies or no friends and no alliances. Our network of alliances and partnerships is a core strategic strength. And no other country on Earth has anything like it.

So just a few weeks ago, the American carrier strike group named for President Reagan conducted operations alongside the Canadian and Japanese navies in the Philippine Sea. And days later, the strike group came together again with Japanese, and Australian, and Indian forces for the annual Malabar exercise.

As one of the American commanders described our operations, “We have an Australian supply ship bringing millions of gallons of fuel, food, and supplies to a carrier strike group escorted by Japanese, Canadian, and American warships.”

Now, that type of cooperation is rare and precious in world history.

But for the United States and our allies and partners, it’s all in a day’s work.

Or consider the AUKUS partnership. Next week, I’ll welcome my Australian and U.K. counterparts to Washington for an important AUKUS defense ministerial.

And so we’re working together on advanced capabilities such as AI and hypersonics. And we’re charting the best pathway for Australia to acquire a nuclear-powered, conventionally armed submarine as early as possible—all while upholding the highest nonproliferation standards.

Now, our network of allies and partners just didn’t happen. It’s a direct result of decades of American leadership. And our friends know that we’ll stand with them to support freedom of navigation, and to defend the rights of small countries not to be bullied by larger ones, and to defend stability and sovereignty and the potential for prosperity that they bring.

Now, the National Defense Strategy is clear-eyed about our main competitors. And that starts with the People’s Republic of China. In recent decades, its military has embarked on a breakneck program of modernization. And the PRC is the only country with both the will and, increasingly, the power to reshape its region and the international order to suit its authoritarian preferences.

So let me be clear: We will not let that happen.

That begins with America’s combat-credible deterrence. And we’re going to sustain and sharpen our war-fighting advantages so that the PRC can never conclude that aggression is in its best interest.

We’re aligning our budget as never before to the China challenge. We’re making the Department’s largest investment ever in R&D and forging stronger capabilities. And we’re modernizing, training, and equipping the U.S. military for contingencies in the Indo-Pacific.

DOD is finally making fundamental and unprecedented shifts in attention and resources toward Asia. Ladies and gentlemen, the Department is putting its focus, its time, and its money where its mouth is. And so we’re matching our investments with new operational concepts suited to 21st-century deterrence in the Indo-Pacific.

We’re bolstering our forward presence in the region to build a more lethal, mobile, and distributed force posture. And we’ll keep investing in a strategy of deterrence and denial.

Now, we’re not doing this alone. I just returned last week from Southeast Asia, where I met in Cambodia with defense leaders from around the region. And nearly every one of them shares our vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific—a region in which countries large and small can chart their own futures and have the capabilities to defend their own interests.

We’re also deeply committed to responsibly managing our competition with the PRC, even as we defend our interests, our allies, and our partners. While I was in Cambodia, I met with General Wei, the PRC’s Minister of National Defense. And I made clear that great powers need to compete responsibly, and keep lines of communication open, and build guardrails at multiple levels.

I also underscored our serious concerns about the increasingly dangerous behavior that we’re seeing from PLA aircraft flying in the Indo-Pacific. And I made clear that the United States will continue to fly, to sail, and operate wherever international law allows.

[Applause]

You know, great powers must choose responsibility over recklessness. Great powers must communicate with candor—and respect the hard-won system of international laws, alliances, norms, and agreements that has made us all more secure and prosperous since the end of World War II.

You know, we can’t take that open and stable order for granted. And that’s one key reason that the world has come together to condemn and resist Russia’s reckless war of choice in Ukraine.

And this decade will be decisive for security in Europe as well as in Asia. So let’s be clear about what we’ve seen in Ukraine. Russia wasn’t provoked. Russia wasn’t threatened. Russia wasn’t attacked. Instead, one man chose war.

And Putin’s war is not the result of NATO expansion. It is the cause of NATO expansion.

And now, because of the Kremlin’s longing for a vanished empire, Europe faces its worst security crisis since the end of World War II. And a member of the U.N. Security Council—let me say that again—a member of the U.N. Security Council is waging war to deny democracy to more than 43 million people.

With deliberate cruelty, Russia is putting civilians and civilian targets in its gunsights. Russian forces have killed thousands of Ukrainian citizens, even as millions more have fled. Russian attacks have left children dead, schools shattered, and hospitals smashed.

So Russia’s neighbors view its imperial aggression with growing alarm. And Putin’s war of choice has given everyone on Earth a preview of a world of tyranny and turmoil that nobody would want to live in. 

And Russia’s assault on its peaceful neighbor has shown every country on Earth the dangers of disorder. And so that’s why so many countries of goodwill have raced to get Ukraine the capabilities to defend itself, including the some 50 members of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group that we’ve created and led. 

It’s why our united and resolute NATO allies have bolstered the alliance’s forward defenses and reinforced its eastern flank. And it’s why the United States has raised our total number of service members deployed in Europe from 80,000 to more than 100,000, and permanently forward-stationed forces in Poland, and hammered home our ironclad commitment to NATO and to Article Five. 

So let’s be clear. We will not be dragged into Putin’s war. But we will stand with Ukraine as it fights to defend its citizens and its sovereignty. And we will stand strong with our NATO allies. And we will defend every inch of NATO territory.

[Applause]

Now, that young Ukrainian fighter and her comrades in arms have shown the moral and military power of a free people roused to its defense. And her fellow citizens on the home front have shown immense resilience in the teeth of Russian aggression.

From President Biden on down, U.S. leadership has been vital to Ukraine’s success. And we are going to support Ukraine’s right to defend itself for as long as it takes.

Now, our ability to shape this decisive decade rests on America’s enduring advantages in national security. So we work hard to draw on the full range of talents of the American people. And we’re driven by the power of patriotism and our restless spirit of innovation.

Our free-enterprise system is key to our national defense. Our defense industrial base is unmatched. And we’ve got to keep it that way.

You know, our outstanding Deputy Secretary of Defense, Kath Hicks, and I meet regularly with industry leaders, including some new partners that used to think the Pentagon was just too hard to work with. And from the World War II mobilization to the MRAPS that I saw in Iraq, our public-private defense partnership protects American troops in the field.

So we’re working to strengthen that industrial base for the long haul. We’re also working closely with Congress to secure multi-year procurement authorities—and allow us to meet the needs of tomorrow.

Now, our partners in the private sector have flagged a consistent problem. Even when they can see a way to deliver a promising technology to a military customer, securing the necessary capital to bring that capability to scale is hard—and sometimes impossible.

So we’ve listened. And we’ve acted. Our Defense Innovation Unit is focused on identifying priority technology areas, using faster methods to get that tech into the hands of our war fighters. And earlier this week, I announced the creation of the Department’s Office of Strategic Capital.

This important office will work to secure U.S. private-sector investment in critical defense-technology areas, ensuring that technology developed in America benefits America. And it’s an example of how we’re creating the conditions for innovators to succeed.

You know, this kind of change doesn’t always move as smoothly or as quickly as I’d like. But we are determined to change the way that the Pentagon does business—and to create a true innovation ecosystem.

Let me make one last point. American firepower is extraordinary. But over the course of my brief, 41-year career in uniform, I learned that the source of our strength isn’t just our weapons.

It’s our democracy.

And that democracy demands something of us all. It’s a daily referendum that asks us all what we are willing to give to the cause of American ideals and human freedom. And it’s time to ask ourselves what each of us will do to help shape this rare and malleable moment in the course of human events. 

Now, our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Guardians risk their lives every day for all of our security.

And even in times of challenge or in hours of division, the American men and women who wear the cloth of our nation inspire us all with their unity of purpose. And they challenge us all to put our shoulder to the wheel. To seize this moment to make America more secure and the world more just. To rally together with our allies and partners who magnify our strength. And to prove again that the democratic ideals of America’s founding still provide the world with a powerful beacon of hope.

So let me quote President Reagan one last time—and this time about what history remembers. 

“Yes, the deeds of infamy and  injustice are all recorded,” he said. “But what shines out from the pages of history is the daring of the dreamers and the deeds of the builders and the doers.”

So in this decisive decade, let us pledge again to be the dreamers, the builders, and the doers. Let us forge a world of greater security, prosperity, and liberty.

And let us meet America’s challenges with confidence, courage, and a can-do spirit. And let us come together to build a brighter, safer future for this country that we love and the democracy that we defend. 

Thank you very much, and may God continue to bless the United States of America.

Disinformation, Data Collection are Cybersecurity Concerns, Kendall Says

Disinformation, Data Collection are Cybersecurity Concerns, Kendall Says

Senior U.S. military and civilian leaders expressed concerns about foreign data collection and disinformation as cybersecurity threats.

“I am terrified of what a regime can do once it gains control of information with modern tools, that facial recognition, monitoring where everybody goes on their phones, who they talk to, what they say, what associations they have,” Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall said during the Reagan National Defense Forum on Dec. 3.

China and Russia’s renewed invasion of Ukraine were the themes of the day at the annual gathering of top military and security officials and elected leaders at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif.

While much of the discussions were on military challenges posed by China, some leaders raised what they saw as the growing risk of the amount of information collected on foreign citizens by China and other countries, either through cyberattacks or voluminous amounts of publicly available data.

“It’s extraordinary the degree to which China, in particular,—but they’re not the only ones, obviously—are developing just frameworks for collecting foreign data and pulling it in, and in their capacity to then turn that around and use it to target audiences for information campaigns or for other things,” Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines said.

China may be collecting data on Americans without their knowledge, Haines said, prompted by a question about TikTok, a Chinese-owned social media platform popular with U.S. troops.

In a broader discussion on cyber threats, Kendall expressed confidence the U.S. military can prevent cyberattacks on military hardware.

“I was thinking earlier about how my career entirely spans the creation of the digital age and the level of concerns about cyber and what we call cyberspace becoming pervasive and ubiquitous, and you can’t do anything in the security area without thinking about cyber considerations,” Kendall said.

That increasing awareness has paid off, the Air Force’s top boss said.

“You’re never going to be perfect, but you can be highly resilient, and you can be at a point where if you get an unexpected attack, you can recover,” Kendall added. “Generally speaking, military systems are designed with some degree of hardening. They use encryption a lot more, for example, and weapons designers are aware of cyber threats. So it’s hard to go after those targets inherently.”

But U.S. military infrastructure is increasingly connected—including to the commercial internet in some cases, Kendall noted.

“That’s our personnel system, our medical system, our transportation system, our logistics system,” he said. “You have to think about all those things as well as all the weapons systems you build and everything they’re connected to for any function that they happen to have.”

Kendall and others stressed the importance of thinking about cybersecurity more broadly than targeted attacks on specific systems and networks.

“It’s an important point to make that when we’re talking about when we’re using the term cyberattack, there are really two pieces,” Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) said on a panel with Kendall. “One is denial of service, bringing down the electric grid, those kinds of things. The other is disinformation.”

Kendall cited disinformation as one of his significant concerns outside of core concerns about how Space Force and Air Force systems operate.

“There is another aspect of this, and I think it’s that we’re still in a free society, wrestling with how to deal with this new technology,” Kendall said.

Kendall cited older, “crude” techniques such as printed propaganda or television commercials as more recognizable attempts to influence people. But the internet has created new avenues for disinformation. Part of cybersecurity is to ensure that the information people receive through networks is not harmful, he said.

“One of the things I think we’re going to have to do is we’re going to have to become much more sophisticated consumers,” Kendall said. “A lot of us are still very susceptible to political influence by people we trust. I think we have to work on that as a society. Or we could go down a road that once we get down it, we get into a position where it can be very, very hard to recover.”