Wolters: Ukraine Needs Fighters, But There’s Still No Consensus Yet to Provide Them

Wolters: Ukraine Needs Fighters, But There’s Still No Consensus Yet to Provide Them

Jan. 10, 2023 | By John A. Tirpak

Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe and retired Air Force Gen. Tod D. Wolters thinks Ukraine’s allies and partners should provide fighters to that country, but there doesn’t seem to be a consensus view on when, and maintaining NATO solidarity is more important right now, he said Jan. 10.

Speaking during a Mitchell Institute webinar, Wolters, who retired as SACEUR and head of U.S. European Command last June, said Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin will discuss how fighter aircraft might be provided to Ukraine at a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in Germany at the end of January. But the goal will be to reach a consensus with members.

Austin “works this issue” of fighters routinely with the contact group, which includes not only NATO members but other interested parties, and in Germany, “he is going after this,” Wolters said.  

“The goal, of course, is to achieve a consensus with that entire group and those nations, about what can” be provided to Ukraine and “be effective in the military campaign as it unfolds today; to work current ops to save as many lives as possible right now, and to ensure that your posture 5-10 years from now is best suited to guarantee follow-on success.”

Wolters said it isn’t clear when fighters should be provided, but “when it’s time, we have to be prepared to make those contributions with combat aircraft. And it is … my belief, based off capabilities that exist in the environment, that we’re still challenged, from a timing perspective, to make this move.” He suggested that there is not yet consensus in NATO about providing the fighters.

For now, “it’s about ensuring that [NATO’s] solidarity is never compromised, and that is part of the overall strategic campaign. And that comes into play when you start to pull this question apart about what is actually going in [to Ukraine] and what is holding off, for the time being.” He declined to say what objections have been raised about such a transfer.

Pentagon spokesman Brig. Gen. Patrick S. Ryder told Air & Space Forces Magazine that “we continue to have a very robust dialogue with the Ukrainians when it comes to their security assistance needs. They have an air force, and they’ve been employing [it] to great effect, in a lot of locations throughout Ukraine.”

Ryder added that “we’ll continue to have that conversation with them, [and] with our international allies, and our partners. And we’ll take a variety of considerations into fact into account—factors to include training, maintenance, sustainability, and also the availability of those types of systems.”

Ukrainian officials have asked the U.S. and its allies for advanced systems like the F-16 for months now, but USAF officials initially were cool on the proposal and have yet to fully commit.

Meanwhile, Wolters said Russia’s lack of precision in its weaponry is “appalling” and leading to countless unnecessary deaths among civilians. He didn’t offer an opinion on the theory that Russia is using hypersonic missiles because it is running out of lower-level precision weapons. But the advent of hypersonics “forces us to ensure that our indications and warning architecture is compatible” in NATO, to see such weapons before they are in their endgame. Authorities for response have to be “fast enough and long enough and accurate enough,” he said.

“The good news is, we have a lot of brilliant people in this country [and] our NATO nations and they’re all working very, very hard to continue to improve our indications and warning architecture from a hypersonics perspective, and that that is ongoing and needs [to] continue,” Wolters said.

Wolters declined to directly address whether he thought the airpower “stalemate” in Ukraine translates to a devaluation of airpower. Instead, he said there’s an academic debate about air superiority “versus [air] denial,” but said there’s no doubt that the nations on NATO’s eastern flank are safer for having a strong air capability among and behind them. He pushed for balance in capability across all domains.

“It’s never just one domain that that you have to be superior in. I believe you need to have a very, very balanced approach because it is a dilemma for the enemy.” A good strategy will include elements from “air, land, sea, space and cyber, to include the information environment,” he said.

Wolters noted that Ukraine’s use of Turkish TB-2 drones for target spotting and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, has been effective, and their role came to light “probably sooner than we wanted it to.”

He also lauded many NATO and partner nations for adopting the F-35, which he said contributes more than just precision attack and stealth, but a capability “in indications and warnings,” command and control, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. All that, plus its speed and range “speaks for itself,” Wolters said. The benefits of interoperability and networking offered by the F-35 and its proliferation among allies and partners “doesn’t bode well for an enemy of NATO,” he said.

PHOTOS: Air Force’s Largest-Ever Launch of C-17s from Single Base

PHOTOS: Air Force’s Largest-Ever Launch of C-17s from Single Base

Jan. 10, 2023 | By Greg Hadley

Two dozen C-17s took off from Joint Base Charleston, S.C., on Jan. 5, the most C-17s to ever launch together from a single base.  

The display of airpower opened with an elephant walk of Globemaster IIIs and included a flyover above the city of Charleston. The maneuvers were part of a broad-ranging force generation exercise that included Air Force, Army, and Marine Corps units all across the Southeast. 

The 24 Globemaster IIIs included more than half the 437th Airlift Wing’s inventory and one in 10 of all the C-17s in the entire U.S. Air Force. Also involved in the exercise were F-16 fighters, KC-135 tankers, and an E-3 AWACS aircraft, for a total of nearly 60 aircraft in the operation, according to a release. 

C-17s
Twenty-four C-17 Globemaster III aircraft assigned to the U.S. Air Force’s 437th and Air Force Reserve’s 315th Airlift Wing at Joint Base Charleston, S.C. fly over Charleston, S.C. during Mission Generation Exercise 23, January 5, 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Nicholas Priest

After the Charleston flyover, the C-17s split into four groups to focus on different mission sets under the umbrella of Agile Combat Employment: command-and-control, navigation, tempo, and logistics under fire. Specifically, the four groups dispersed to Pope Army Airfield, N.C.; Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, N.C.; Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, S.C.; and Hunter Army Airfield, Ga. 

ACE is the Air Force’s operational concept of dispersing forces from large central bases into smaller groups that can operate in remote or austere environments, moving quickly as needed with Airmen sometimes performing tasks outside of their usual career fields. 

“We have to fight to get to the fight,” Col. Robert Lankford, 437th Airlift Wing commander, said in a statement. “This exercise tests our ability to accomplish the mission, while geographically dispersed and with limited communications.” 

At Pope, Airmen established a tactical operations center alongside a Joint Communications Support Element from MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., while special tactics Airmen performed a static-line jump to secure a dirt landing strip. 

At Cherry Point, aircrews loaded High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) onto the aircraft, then flew to Pope to practice HIMARS rapid infiltration, in which the system is quickly unloaded and readied for use. 

At Beaufort, the C-17s performed an “integrated combat turn” and refueled U.S. Army AH-64 Apache helicopters. And at Hunter, Airmen practiced maneuvering cargo under fire, operating outside of their primary duties.  

“What we’re practicing are flexible deterrent and flexible response options,” said Maj. Zachary Barry, a C-17 pilot and the lead planner for the exercise, in a release. “If we can move really quickly, it makes it harder for the adversary to respond.” 

In addition to the 437th Airlift Wing, Airmen from the 24th Special Operations Wing, 315th Airlift Wing, 169th Fighter Wing, and the Joint Communications Support Element participated in the exercise, among others. 

C-17s
Pilots from the 437th Airlift Wing taxi C-17 Globemaster III aircraft before a mission generation exercise at Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina, Jan. 5, 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Dawn M. Weber

“Every day, we are learning new lessons that we want to apply in combat, so this mission generation exercise is a chance to test our capabilities at a tempo and scale that approximates combat operations,” 18th Air Force commander Maj. Gen. Corey Martin said in a statement. 

A workhorse long-range airlifter, the C-17 and its aircrews at Joint Base Charleston were drawn into the spotlight in August 2021 during the noncombatant evacuation out of Afghanistan. With thousands of Afghan civilians, U.S. personnel, and citizens from allied nations seeking to flee the Taliban, the Air Force deployed dozens of C-17s to Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul every day for weeks, where they ferried out more than 124,000 people to safety, the largest airlift in history. 

Airmen from the 437th Airlift Wing and the Air Force Reserve’s 315th Airlift Wing played a key role in the evacuation, and this past November, Air Mobility Command boss Gen. Mike Minihan visited the base to award 51 Distinguished Flying Cross medals to Airmen who participated in the operation—one of the largest DFC ceremonies in recent history. 

F-35 Flies for the First Time with Tech Refresh 3, Paving the Way for Block 4

F-35 Flies for the First Time with Tech Refresh 3, Paving the Way for Block 4

Jan. 10, 2023 | By John A. Tirpak

The first F-35A fitted with the Tech Refresh 3 update flew Jan. 6 from Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., the Joint Program Office announced. The TR-3 suite of more powerful processors and memory is the enabling upgrade on which most of the planned F-35 Block 4 improvements rely.

The Block 4 version of the F-35 will have new electronic warfare capabilities, new sensors, and capabilities for new weapons, as well as improved interoperability with fourth-generation fighters, the fifth-generation F-22, and other parts of the Joint Forces.

The Air Force has reduced its request for F-35s in recent years, with officials saying they prefer to wait for the more advanced Block 4 version of the jet and want to avoid having to retrofit as many of its existing F-35 fleet to the Block 4 standard as possible.

But Block 4 has been delayed by trouble getting the TR-3 flight ready. In fact, delays and technical problems with the TR-3 account for a $330 million increase in the F-35’s development costs, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office. Development of Block 4 is now three years late and will continue until 2029, the GAO said in April 2022.

The first production-model version of the F-35 with TR-3 installed—but not the full Block 4 suite—will come in Lot 15, now under construction. The government struck a deal for Lots 15 and 16, with options for Lot 17, with Lockheed Martin on Dec. 30.

In a press release, Air Force Lt. Gen. Michael Schmidt, program executive officer for the F-35, hailed the first flight of TR-3 as a “significant achievement” for the program.

The “TR-3 is the F-35’s critical computer processing electronics upgrade that will continue to provide all our pilots with the capability they need to be successful against any adversary,” Schmidt said, adding that there’s “still a lot of work to do and I am confident that our industry partners and government team will get the job done.”

Regarding the challenges in its development, the JPO acknowledged that “the TR-3 program has overcome technical complexity challenges with hardware and software and is now on-track to deliver capability to the U.S. and its allies starting in 2023,” when the first Lot 15 jets will roll off the production line. The government-industry team continues “to find innovative ways to ensure delivery of critical capabilities to defeat future threats. Lessons learned in the execution of the TR-3 program will be applied across the entire Block 4 modernization program.”

The JPO did not immediately respond to a query from Air & Space Forces Magazines about how long TR-3 flight testing will take, but in its release, the office said the flight marked the beginning of “an extensive flight test campaign,” with developmental and operational test flights continuing “through 2023 to ensure safety and warfighting capabilities.”

Government and industry officials have said the system has been heavily tested on the ground to ensure that everything will work together properly on the actual flying aircraft.

A developmental test team from the 461st Flight Test Squadron conducted the first flight of the TR-3-equipped aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. The aircraft was AF-7, one of the designated F-35 test airplanes for the Air Force, instrumented to record actual performance, which will be compared with computer predictions.

Maj. Ryan Luerson, an Air Force test pilot, flew the 50-minute hop, which reached an altitude of 35,000 feet and a speed just below Mach 1, to test airworthiness and stability of the software.

Air Force Lt. Col. Christopher Campbell, commander of the 461st Flight Test Squadron and director of the F-35 Integrated Test Force, said TR-3 “modernizes the computational core of the F-35 air vehicle. Therefore, new TR-3 hardware and software affect nearly every aircraft feature. Today’s event was just the start of a comprehensive flight test campaign that will both verify and improve the safety, stability, and performance of the whole F-35 weapon system in this new configuration.”

Lockheed Martin aeronautics F-35 VP and general manager Bridget Lauderdale said the flight “is an important step in enabling future capabilities to ensure F-35 remains unrivaled across the globe. We look forward to continued collaboration with the JPO and industry partners to deliver TR-3.”

The Air Force’s New 12-Week Parental Leave Policy: Here’s How it Works

The Air Force’s New 12-Week Parental Leave Policy: Here’s How it Works

Jan. 9, 2023 | By Greg Hadley

Airmen and Guardians may now take up to 12 weeks of paid parental leave under the Pentagon’s new Military Parental Leave Program (MPLP). 

Authorized by Congress in the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act, policy details were released Jan. 4, retroactive to Dec. 27, 2022. The new policy covers births, adoptions, and long-term care requirements for new foster children.

Airmen and Guardians who exhausted available parental leave under the old policy prior to Dec. 27 are not eligible to take the longer leave; but any parent with unused or unforfeited parental leave as of Dec. 27 is now able to extend to the new 12-week standard. 

Under the prior policy, in place since 2018, a new child’s primary caregiver could take an additional six weeks of leave after convalescent leave, while the secondary caregiver could take three weeks. 

The new leave policy doesn’t put a specific timeframe on convalescent leave, instead leaving it up to the recommendation of the birth parent’s health care provider “to address a diagnosed medical condition.” Convalescent leave begins the day after the new child’s birth, or after the birth parent is discharged from the hospital, whichever is later. 

After that, both primary and secondary caregivers have a year to take their 12 weeks of leave, which may be taken in increments of seven or more days, and need not be taken all at once. 

The 2022 NDAA mandating the new 12-week policy called for the Pentagon to implement the policy within a year of the law taking effect, putting the deadline at Dec. 27, 2022. That’s why, after initially missing that date, DOD made the policy retroactive. 

As long as a service member had unused caregiver leave as of Dec. 27, they’ll be allowed to take the full 12 weeks of leave. So if an Airman had completed two weeks of secondary caregiver leave as Dec. 27, leaving one week under the old policy, he or she is now eligible for an additional nine weeks, bringing the total leave to 12 weeks. 

Similarly, a Guardian who had taken five weeks of primary caregiver leave as of Dec. 27, leaving one week to go before returning to work, is now be eligible for an additional six weeks, again for a total of 12 . 

Airmen and Guardians who returned to work before Dec. 27 and gave up parental leave will not get a reprieve. Having forfeited parental leave under the previous policy there is no chance now to gain the added time off.  

Meanwhile, any Airman or Guardian in the middle of their six weeks of convalescent leave authorized under the previous policy will be allowed to finish that leave and then take 12 weeks of parental leave. 

While the services require all leave be taken within 12 months of a birth, adoption, or foster child placement, members deployed for military operations can defer parental leave until their deployment is completed. 

To request leave under the new policy, Airmen and Guardians must use LeaveWeb, which was updated Jan. 6, or AF Form 988. Separate requests are now necessary for convalescent and parental leave, as they are now treated as distinct and separate events.  

For more details, read the full Department of the Air Force Guidance Memorandum, or this rundown of frequently asked questions. 

Advocates say the new leave policy will help the Pentagon retain and attract talent amid a historically competitive job market, putting military parental leave policies more in line with the rest of the federal government and making them arguably more generous than most private employers. 

No More Tape Test: Air Force Announces New Body Composition Program

No More Tape Test: Air Force Announces New Body Composition Program

Jan. 9, 2023 | By Greg Hadley

Editor’s note: This story was updated at 11 a.m. Jan. 10 with additional information from the Air Force.

Goodbye tape test, hello waist-height ratio. 

The Department of the Air Force unveiled its new body composition program Jan. 9, more than two years after dropping the unpopular abdominal circumference measurements from fitness assessments. Now, instead of getting a point total based on waist measurements, Airmen and Guardians will divide their waist by their height in inches. For example, an Airman who stands 69 inches tall and has a waist of 36 inches would have a waist-to-height ratio of 0.52. 

According to a DAF release, any ratio below 0.55 is deemed a low or moderate risk, meeting the standard. Ratios equal to or above 0.55 will be considered a high risk and out of standard.

When waist-to-height ratio scoring chart first leaked online in February 2022, it showed 0.55 ratios and above to be high risk. The Air Force surgeon general’s office said that chart was “pre-decisional.” That chart also noted a difference between low- and moderate-risk ratios, while the DAF release did not define the distinction.  

The leaked chart also showed a narrow range of scores—below a ratio of 0.40—that were not given a designation of low, moderate, or high risk. In order to have such a ratio, a service member would have to be relatively tall with a very small waist. An Air Force spokeswoman said there would be no high-risk designation for very low waist-height ratios.

For service members deemed high risk, a yearlong “informal, self-directed Body Composition Improvement Program” is in store, including a referral for medical evaluation and “assessment for additional risk factors.” There are are no disciplinary implications during this period, the Air Force said, but if the member is still not meeting standards after a year, a mandatory formal self-directed program will be imposed.

“That may result in consideration for administrative action, including separation for continued failures,” according to the Air Force release. 

“The goal of the new program is to empower Airmen to take charge of their health and fitness through lifestyle enhancement to optimize readiness,” said Lt. Gen. Caroline Miller, deputy chief of staff for manpower, personnel, and services, in a statement.

In the Space Force, high-risk Guardians will be referred to Guardian Resilience Teams, including “human performance subject matter experts with different specialties,” such as preventive care, performance optimization, mental health care, and spiritual assistance. This policy follows the Space Force’s holistic health program, which includes a fitness program without annual tests. 

The Air Force stopped using waist measurements as part of its fitness test in 2020, amidst the pause in PT testing at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. The department noted at the time, however, that Pentagon policy still required the recording of body composition. In November 2021, the Air Force surgeon general settled on waist-to-height ratio as the service’s new measurement method, and in March 2022, DOD changed its policy to give the services more latitude in measuring body composition. 

Critics of the old waist measurements said the measurement was a simplistic means of guessing at individuals’ bodyfat percentage. Body builders in particular suffered under a system in which they could excel in the tests only to be suspect based on the measuring tape.  The new body composition program is separate from the PT tests, erasing that connection.

The new assessments will begin in April. 

CSIS Simulation Offers a Rare Look at US-China Clash over Taiwan and the World of Wargaming

CSIS Simulation Offers a Rare Look at US-China Clash over Taiwan and the World of Wargaming

Jan. 9, 2023 | By Chris Gordon

The U.S. could take thousands of casualties but in most cases would ultimately prevail: These were the conclusions drawn from a series of 24 wargames run by the Center for Strategic and International Studies that assessed a scenario in which China attempted an amphibious invasion of Taiwan in 2026.

Wargames are a common way for civilian and military decision-makers to test out strategies or plan for conflict. Often, they are highly classified and their conclusions, methodologies, and assumptions are never publicly explained in detail.

But as Taiwan has emerged as a point of major contention between Washington and Beijing, CSIS took the unusual step of releasing its findings and methodology.

“Classified wargames are not transparent to the public,” an executive summary of the exercise published by CSIS states. “Without a suitable analysis, public debate will remain unanchored.”

The series of wargames, funded by the Smith Richardson Foundation, explored a variety of scenarios with different participants. The rules for the wargames were based on historical data and research, including theoretical weapons performance.

As Beijing has built up its forces and sought to coerce the self-governing island of Taiwan to unite with mainland China, U.S. lawmakers, officials, and observers’ concerns about a military conflict in the Indo-Pacific have grown. The Department of Defense cites China as its “pacing” challenge in its new National Defense Strategy. But how a war over Taiwan might be fought by the U.S. military has been unclear.

Pentagon wargames that influence policy and shape military strategy draw on intelligence assessments and non-public data, such as high-resolution imagery and classified information about the specifications of U.S., allied, and the adversary’s equipment. But CSIS’s report notes classified wargames’ “assumptions and even results are not transparent to the public.”

“Probably the most significant thing is that they did the wargame in an unclassified format,” retired USAF Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies and one of the wargames’ participants, said. “It allows for open discourse and dialogue on some of the consequences as a result of the game which normally don’t get discussed because it’s all done behind the cloak of classification.”

The 24 game iterations presented sobering findings: high attrition of forces on both sides, massive U.S. surface ship and aircraft losses, and quick exhaustion of long-range precision-guided munitions. Attacks on U.S. forces based in Japan could quickly draw the Japanese into the conflict.

“In most scenarios, the United States/Taiwan/Japan defeated a conventional amphibious invasion by China and maintained an autonomous Taiwan. However, this defense came at high cost,” authors Mark Cancian, Matthew Cancian, and Eric Heginbotham write in CSIS’s report. “The United States and its allies lost dozens of ships, hundreds of aircraft, and tens of thousands of service members. Taiwan saw its economy devastated. Further, the high losses damaged the U.S. global position for many years.”

According to a 2022 Pew Research Center Poll, 86 percent of Americans view China’s military power as either a “somewhat serious” or “very serious” problem. Eight-two percent felt the same way about tensions between Taiwan and China.

But there is little in the public domain about what a conflict with China might entail, including its potential toll in blood and treasure to the U.S.

“Is the United States ready as a nation to accept losses that would come from a carrier strike group sunk at the bottom of the Pacific? We have not had to face losses like that as a nation for quite some time. It would actually create a broader societal change that I’m not sure we’ve totally grappled with,” Becca Wasser, the head of the Center for a New American Security’s Gaming Lab and a participant in the wargames, said. “We need to prepare for some of the worst-case scenarios to effectively deter in the Indo-Pacific, and that requires us making changes now.”

According to the CSIS report, America must urgently address its supply of long-range precision weapons, such as the AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missiles (LRASMs), prepare to operate from more dispersed air bases, harden shelters for aircraft, and strength bomber forces, among other recommendations.

“If we’re not prepared, it’s going to take a loss for the nation to wake up, and hopefully we’ll have time to correct,” Deptula said.

Added Wasser: “We’re trying to play out the war not because we want the war to happen, but because we’re trying to ensure it does not happen.”

Canada Officially Signs Deal for 88 New F-35 Fighters

Canada Officially Signs Deal for 88 New F-35 Fighters

Jan. 9, 2023 | By John A. Tirpak

Canada has finalized a deal with Lockheed Martin and engine-maker Pratt & Whitney to buy 88 F-35A fighters after protracted political uncertainty over the purchase. Deliveries to Canada, one of the original F-35 developmental partners, will start in 2026.

With the sale, Canada becomes the 17th nation that is either already equipped with the F-35 or has taken formal steps to acquire it. Switzerland and Germany were the most recent customers, ordering 36 and 35 F-35As last year, respectively.  

The on-again, off-again Canadian buy was finalized Jan. 9 after Ottawa announced in 2022 that the F-35 had prevailed in the Future Fighter Capability Project competition. It had previously won another Canadian competition in 2010, but several administrations in Ottawa tabled the purchase and restructured Canada’s combat aviation plans. The acquisition remains a contentious political issue in Canada.

Canada went out to industry with a request for offers in 2017, which also brought proposals on the Boeing F/A-18E/F, Eurofighter Typhoon, the French Dassault Rafale, and the Swedish Saab JAS-39 Gripen, all but the last of which were ruled out or withdrew. The Gripen was eliminated early last year, but Saab said it had been unfairly evaluated.   

The Royal Canadian Air Force expects to reach full operational capability for its 88 F-35s between 2032 and 2034. The cost of buying the jets is estimated to be about $15 billion in U.S. dollars, $19 billion in Canadian dollars, and Canada is budgeting a life-cycle cost for the F-35 at $52 billion U.S., $70 billion Canadian. The F-35s will replace Canada’s older F/A-18A/C fleet, which is nearing 40 years in age.

The Canadian defense ministry said the jets will be acquired in a “staggered” fashion. The first batch of aircraft will comprise 16 F-35As.

The sale includes sustainment and training, weapons, spares and facilities construction at two sites in Canada.

“This is the largest investment in the RCAF in the last 30 years,” the Canadian ministry of defense said in a press release, and will include new facilities construction at the Bagotville, Quebec and Cold Lake, Alberta bases. The agreement is the result of an “open, fair and transparent competition,” the ministry said.  

“As the rules-based international order is challenged around the world, the F-35 will be essential for protecting Canadians, enhancing Arctic security and national sovereignty, and enabling Canada to meet its NATO, NORAD and other obligations well into the future,” the defense ministry said in its release. “The Government of Canada will continue to do whatever it takes to protect Canadians and make continued, significant investments to give the members of our Canadian Armed Forces the equipment that they need to do their jobs.”

As an original developmental partner in the F-35, Canada invested about $200 million in the program in exchange for participation in its technology and support enterprise. Because of that status, the sale will be managed neither as a straight commercial transaction nor as a Foreign Military Sales program, but a hybrid. The aircraft will still come through the U.S. government, however, under the aegis of the Joint Program Office, which manages the F-35 enterprise for the U.S. and its partners.

The agreement “meets Canada’s requirements and outcomes, including value for money, flexibility, protection against risks, performance, and delivery assurances,” the ministry said. It also touted the economic benefit for Canada, saying the sale “has the potential to contribute over $425 million annually to Canada’s gross domestic product, and close to 3,300 jobs annually for Canadian industry, and value chain partners over a 25-year period (direct and indirect).”

The statement added that defense officials “conducted extensive engagement with suppliers, including Canadian aerospace and defense industries, to ensure that they were well positioned to participate in the procurement.”

Canada’s decision to “procure almost 90 jets underscores the value of the incredible F-35 Lightning II,” Program Executive Officer Lt. Gen. Michael J. Schmidt said in a press statement.

The F-35 “is the best in the world, providing unmatched interoperability to America, Canada, and the additional 15 nations that have selected the fighter. It is a global game-changer. Through power-projection, the F-35 is at the tip of the spear for deterrence. Its forward presence will continue to ensure that potential adversaries choose diplomacy over armed conflict,” he said.

Lockheed said the F-35 operates from 27 bases worldwide, with nine nations operating it “on their home soil.” There are more than 890 fighters now in service.

The JPO inked a deal with Lockheed on Jan. 3 for production Lots 15-17 of the F-35, which will be the first to have the Tech Refresh 3 modifications underlying the Block 4 upgrade of the jet.

Air Force Aims to Get More eVTOL Platforms into Testing, Exercises in 2023

Air Force Aims to Get More eVTOL Platforms into Testing, Exercises in 2023

Jan. 9, 2023 | By Christopher Prawdzik

After several years of analysis, experiments, and contract awards, the Air Force’s work with electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft initiative is poised to transition to more field testing in 2023.

Since April 2020, the service has been looking at eVTOL aircraft, including fixed-wing and rotor configurations, through an initiative that combines military and commercial resources to create, test, and field the smaller aircraft, which could have a variety of uses carrying small numbers of personnel or cargo.

Known as AFWERX Agility Prime, the initiative is aimed at creating a new atmosphere of cooperation between government and industry and spurring innovation and development in the eVTOL space. At the cornerstone of this cooperation with industry is AFWERX AFVentures, which operates the Air Force’s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology programs.

After more than two years of important milestones, the program and its many partners are poised to take big leaps in 2023.

“Our big focus this year that we need to do for the program is get some of the piloted and larger platforms out in the hands of our test professionals,” Lt. Col. Thomas Meagher, AFWERX Prime division chief, told Air & Space Forces Magazine. “You can get these things into exercises and see what they can do, which serves two purposes: One, it informs us for those use cases … but then, two, it also shows others what they are capable of, which will, in turn, inform Air Force and DOD decisions.”

With its own expertise, resources, and assets, the Pentagon and USAF can support innovative companies, which in turn bring an abundance of high-tech knowledge to the table.

“Just providing some of those things is certainly a key area of collaboration that they’ve found very valuable that the government can do fairly easily,” Meagher said. “It’s been fairly successful and beneficial for them going out the door.”

These strides are not lost on the many commercial industry partners working with the Air Force.

Among eVTOL milestones reached in 2022, Joby Aviation scored a high-altitude mark of more than 11,000 feet and a speed of more than 200 mph. The company previously received approval for military airworthiness in late 2020.

Greg Bowles, Joby Aviation’s head of government and regulatory affairs, said the company looks forward to future collaboration and understands the importance of ensuring U.S. leadership in eVTOL advancement.

“Joby has been a part of Agility Prime since its inception, allowing us access to critical government test facilities and providing funding for us to further prove out the reliability and efficiency of the design,” he said. “The partnership provides valuable support for ongoing development efforts and allows Joby’s partners to see first-hand the potential for this aircraft in their future concept of operations.”

BETA Technologies reached a major milestone as well when two Air Force test pilots sat behind the controls of its ALIA aircraft in March 2022.

“This marked the first time an Airman from the USAF flew an eVTOL aircraft, and signifies the military’s readiness to procure and integrate electric aircraft into its fleet,” said Camron Guthrie of BETA Technologies. “For BETA, the relationship has been deep and collaborative, as it’s enabled us to use DOD resources and expertise to help assess the airworthiness of our designs, optimize our flight test planning, and share lessons learned as we expanded the envelope of our all-electric aircraft. 

The ALIA also set additional high marks in 2022, achieving a 255-mile range and a high-endurance flight time of 2 hours, 2 minutes.

Elroy Air is another partner that has seen strides in the past year and is looking forward to future collaboration, which began with a SBIR contract in 2019. Their Chaparral aircraft represents some of the dual potential in the program—while working with the armed forces, Elroy is also slated to begin testing with FedEx in 2023 for business-to-business unmanned deliveries.

Karl Purdy, Elroy Air’s director of business development said flight autonomy, a particular area of interest for the Air Force, is a focus for the company. Right now, phase one of autonomy involves the pilot only interceding when necessary. Moving forward, that technology will expand.

“Phase two will be the aircraft determining options for potential conflicts and informing the operator who can say, ‘Yep, go ahead,’ or ‘No, do this instead,’” he said. “Phase three is the aircraft making all the decisions, notifying the operator of what it’s doing, but has no expectation for the operator to get involved.”

LIFT Aircraft had some recent firsts as well, with the company training the first Air Force cadre to fully operate an eVTOL aircraft. LIFT also received a Phase III Agility Prime contract last year that led to additional testing at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.

“We favor a more aggressive testing approach than others may have in the past with manned aircraft, and the reason is, we can test unmanned first,” Kevin Rustagi, director of business development for LIFT said. While still being safety conscious, LIFT has used that aggressive testing process to gather valuable data, which is why the Air Force has engaged small business, Rustagi added.

“There’s been a lot of interesting back and forth, because there are times when we say, ‘Oh, actually, let’s really slow down and focus on this thing,’ and the Air Force has been very encouraging on that, and then … there are times when we say, ‘All right, let’s go ahead and accelerate here,’ and I think the Air Force has been receptive to that as well,” Rustagi said.

eVTOL
The Hexa, an electric, vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, lifts off during its first test flight at a military airfield July 7 at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. The Hexa team completed the aircraft’s flight test via remote control. The aircraft, which used 18 motors and propellors, flew for approximately 10 minutes and reached a height of about 50 feet. U.S. Air Force photo/Samuel King Jr.

Brandon Robinson, CEO of Horizon Aircraft, noted the speed at which the Air Force can onboard some of this technology and also keep its finger on the pulse of the ever-developing industry through this process. Horizon participated in the AFWERX High Speed Vertical Takeoff and Landing Challenge with its Cavorite X-series aircraft in 2022 and were accepted for the program’s Phase 1 investment.

“Ours is unique, insofar that it’s one of the fastest machines in the market,” Robinson said.” It’s also hybrid electric, so it’s not limited to a 100-kilometer range, because it has batteries and a typical gas burning turbine engine on it.”

But with his company actively innovating in areas such as high-voltage electric systems, ducted fan design, hybrid electric systems, and advanced electric motors, some challenges exist.

“People with extensive knowledge in these areas can be very hard to find, and they are in high demand,” he said. “We count ourselves fortunate to have assembled a world class team here at Horizon Aircraft and we will continue to push to bring on world-class talent in 2023.”

As 2023 begins, Air Force and industry officials said they continue to discover new opportunities as the program evolves.

“Whether it’s in the advanced air mobility sector or leveraging the other investment in other areas within aviation, there [are] a lot of new ideas that are out there on the civilian side … that will eventually have certainly some interest in use on the DOD side,” Meagher said. “So, finding where those key areas in industry and investment are that have the potential to make significant impacts down the road is really what the program is about and the approach is about.”

US to Supply Ukraine with Bradleys, New Air Weapons in Massive $3 Billion Aid Package

US to Supply Ukraine with Bradleys, New Air Weapons in Massive $3 Billion Aid Package

Jan. 6, 2023 | By Chris Gordon

The Biden administration announced a massive new aid package for Ukraine on Jan. 6, totaling over $3 billion and including armored infantry fighting vehicles, Zuni rockets, and other weapons once considered off-limits.

The Pentagon will send 50 Bradley fighting vehicles, which American defense officials said will help Ukraine push Russian forces back and regain territory in the east and south of the country, as part of a $2.85 billion package from Pentagon stocks. The U.S. will also send $682 million to countries on NATO’s eastern flank, which have depleted their own arsenals to come to Ukraine’s aid. An additional $225 million will be given to Ukraine to “cover wartime requirements” and support the sustainment of previously provided weapons systems, according to the State Department.

The latest package also includes new air capabilities. In a bid to bolster Ukraine’s air force, the U.S. will send 4,000 Zuni rockets, which can be fired at ground targets. The U.S. also recently announced it was sending Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) to Ukraine. Previously, the Pentagon had focused on sending AGM-88 High-speed Anti-Radiation Missiles, which could attack Russian surface-to-air missile sites. However, the Zuni and the JDAMs give Ukraine’s air force a new strike capability.

“In terms of providing Ukraine with capability for their aircraft, it’s actually something we’ve been working on for a while,” Laura Cooper, deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia, said in a briefing at the Pentagon. “This is really just the latest in efforts to help them to make their existing aircraft fleet as effective as possible.”

Cooper said the Zuni rockets could be mounted on fixed-wing or rotary-wing aircraft.

“It’s-air to-ground, but it’s at fairly close range,” she said.

The Zuni rockets have laser-guided and unguided versions, and it was not immediately clear which type the U.S. was providing. When asked how Ukraine would employ rockets designed for American aircraft onto aircraft designed in the Soviet Union, Cooper cracked a wry smile.

“I trust our engineers, and I definitely trust the Ukrainian engineers,” she said. And “It is something that is possible.”

In the latest effort to help meet Ukraine’s air defense needs, the U.S. will also provide RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missiles that will be modified for use in Ukrainian Buk launchers.

“It is a creative solution that did require some engineering finesse,” Cooper said of using American surface-to-air missiles in Russian-made launchers. “But we’re very pleased that it will work for the Ukrainians.”

Ukraine has come under attack from Russian drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles, and the U.S. and its allies have scrambled to provide better air defenses.

In a move lauded by the Biden administration, Germany recently announced it would provide an advanced PATRIOT battery, a system that costs hundreds of millions of dollars and can help protect key areas of Ukraine as Russia seeks to pummel the country into submission from the air during winter. The U.S. pledged one of its prized PATRIOT systems in December.

“We will continue to support Ukraine’s urgent requirement for air defense capabilities to defend against Russia’s brutal attacks,” Cooper said. “Ukrainian forces are showing an undiminished will to fight to defend their country. Ukraine will continue fighting through the winter with the backing of a large coalition of nations, and we continue to encourage allies and partners to make additional donations to bolster Ukraine’s combat and air defense capabilities.”

The M2A2 Bradley is a tracked vehicle that can carry around half a dozen soldiers into battle. The U.S. will also support the Bradleys with 500 TOW anti-tank missiles and 250,000 rounds of 25-millimeter ammunition, as well as self-propelled artillery for the first time.

The U.S. is still declining to provide tanks to Ukraine, but Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Patrick S. Ryder argued the Bradley is “not a tank, but it’s a tank-killer.”

The latest U.S. package includes:

  • 50 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles with 500 TOW anti-tank missiles and 250,000 rounds of 25mm ammunition; 
  • 100 M113 Armored Personnel Carriers; 
  • 55 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles (MRAPs); 
  • 138 High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs); 
  • 18 155mm self-propelled Howitzers and 18 ammunition support vehicles; 
  • 70,000 155mm artillery rounds; 
  • 500 precision-guided 155mm artillery rounds; 
  • 1,200 155mm rounds of Remote Anti-Armor Mine (RAAM) Systems; 
  • 36 105mm towed Howitzers and 95,000 105mm artillery rounds; 
  • 10,000 120mm mortar rounds; 
  • Additional ammunition for High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS); 
  • RIM-7 missiles for air defense; 
  • 4,000 Zuni aircraft rockets; 
  • Approximately 2,000 anti-armor rockets; 
  • Sniper rifles, machine guns, and ammunition for grenade launchers and small arms; 
  • Claymore anti-personnel munitions; 
  • Night vision devices and optics; 
  • Spare parts and other field equipment.