Now Enlisted Airmen Can Swap Assignments. But Only If You Meet All Requirements

Now Enlisted Airmen Can Swap Assignments. But Only If You Meet All Requirements

Airmen will be able to swap assignments starting June 1, but the offer comes with strings attached. 

The new enlisted assignment swap program announced May 25 is open available to senior master sergeants and below who can find a match for:   

  • Air Force Specialty Code 
  • Skill level 
  • Grade or projected grade 
  • Special Experience Identifier (as required) 
  • Vector (as required) 
  • Security Clearance (as required) 

Airmen will also have to have the same PCS eligibility “such as time on station, tour length, and retainability,” according to a memo from assistant secretary for manpower and reserve affairs Alex Wagner, which leaked on Reddit and was confirmed as authentic to Air & Space Forces Magazine.

Both parties must initiate assignment swaps within 90 days from their assignment selection date to qualify. Airmen with adverse quality force indicators are ineligible.

People commenting on Reddit expressed concern over the time-on-station requirement, which is four years for career Airmen. That will limit the pool of eligible Airmen.

The concept first arose eight months ago with Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne Bass teased a new assignment swap policy at AFA’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference, drawing spirited applause from the crowd.

In a release, Air Force leaders urged Airmen not to use open online platforms like Reddit to coordinate assignment swaps, citing the need to protect confidential information and operational security.  

Instead, they recommended using MyVector, the Air Force’s online platform for career development and mentorship—while also noting the frustrations many Airmen have with the service’s web applications.

“The program application on MyVector isn’t perfect, but it will evolve throughout the year,” Wagner said. “We understand the frustrations with our IT infrastructure, which is why it’s important for you to provide feedback to the team to make them better.” 

“We aren’t waiting for the perfect system to be built and I’m glad to see this program come to fruition,” added Bass. 

The Air Force has had an assignment swap policies in the past—Airmen previously used online forums and newspaper classified ads to search for possible swaps. 

Several years ago, however, the program was shut down when it was determined to be “unfair,” according to an Air Force Personnel Center post on Facebook. Because Airmen had to cover their own moving expenses, some in the lower ranks couldn’t afford to participate. All told, less than 5 percent of Airmen took advantage of the program. 

The new swap program aims to fix that problem—in his memo, Wagner wrote that “this policy will not require Airmen to pay for their relocations.” 

Oregon Guard Base Will Get Third F-35 Schoolhouse

Oregon Guard Base Will Get Third F-35 Schoolhouse

F-35As are headed to Kingsley Field in Klamath Falls, Ore., which will become home to the Air Force’s third formal training F-35A training unit, the USAF announced May 25. 

Some 20 F-35s will replace the 27 F-15Cs currently at the Oregon Air National Guard base, pending an environmental impact analysis that’s expected to finish in 2025. The move is a change from a 2020 plan to establish an F-15EX schoolhouse at Kingsley, which has long hosted F-15C/D training. 

But given the “strategic focus in the Indo-Pacific Command theater” and the need to field fifth-generation aircraft “as quickly as possible,” the 173rd Fighter Wing announced in February that the plan was again under review.  

The Air Force has also said it no longer plans to acquire 144 F-15EX Eagle IIs. After considering ending the program at 80 aircraft, planners now say they want a force of 104. 

But what USAF really wants and needs are fifth-generation jets that combine low-observable stealth with advanced electronics to pose a more complex threat to adversaries. The Air Force’s fiscal 2024 budget request seeks 48 F-35s and 24 F-15EXs. At that rate, Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. has said the F-35A will soon surpass the F-16 as the service’s biggest fighter fleet. 

“The Eagle II is a fantastic aircraft, and Team Kingsley was ready and willing to take on that mission,” Col. Lee Bouma, 173rd Fighter Wing commander, said in a statement. “However, our strategic focus has shifted since 2020; the Air Force needs F-35 squadrons available and fully mission-capable to prevail against peer adversaries. … That means they require more F-35 pilots. Team Kingsley’s adaptability and excellence allows us to fill this Air Force need.” 

The Air Force already has formal F-35 training units at Luke Air Force Base, Ariz., and Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. With Kingsley, the F-35 will match the F-16 in having three FTUs. 

Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, N.C., will take over all basic F-15 training in early 2026, with follow-on training on their specific model at their first unit. F-15Cs will gradually be retired in the coming years, remaining longest in Air National Guard units. Newer F-15E and F-15EX models will remain as part of the Air Force’s planned four-fighter fleet of the future

The Oregon ANG is still slated to get the F-15EX—the 142nd Wing at Portland Air National Guard Base is supposed to have the first operational F-15EX unit in fiscal 2025. 

The Likely Next Air Force Chief—and All the Contenders

The Likely Next Air Force Chief—and All the Contenders

Now that President Biden has officially said Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. is his choice to be the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Pentagon leaders need to decide who will succeed Brown to become the 23rd Air Force Chief of Staff?

The odds on favorite is Vice Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin, a career mobility and test pilot with an extensive operational and staff background. Allvin maintained a low profile for most of his tenure as the vice, but has had a more public role since the start of the year, apparently laying the groundwork for him to become the face of the force.

Allvin is the 40th Vice Chief of Staff, and would be the 10th of those to become Chief of Staff if he proves to be the choice. He’d also be the third this century, following Gen. David Goldfein, Chief No. 21, and Gen. T. Michael Moseley, No. 18.

As a leader on the Air Staff, Allvin has been a visionary helping to craft the joint force operating concepts advanced by three successive chiefs: Gen. Mark Welsh, No. 20, along with Goldfein and Brown. He helped write “America’s Air Force: A Call to the Future” in 2014 and the “Air Force Future Operating Concept” in 2015, both critical precursors to what would become Goldfein’s vision for multi-domain operations and, ultimately, what is now known throughout the services as Joint All-Domain Command and Control. 

More recently, he has been a leading voice tackling the service’s challenges with recruiting and retention.

Surprise selections

But just because Allvin is seen as the clear leading contender doesn’t mean surprises can’t happen. Before Goldfein was selected in 2015, news outlets failed to see him among the main contenders.

Candidates are all but certain to already be four-star generals. With the sole exception of the Air Force’s first chief, Gen. Carl A. Spaatz, every CSAF was a four-star and a career operator. While In at least one case—Chief No. 19, Gen. Norton Schwartz—the eventual choice was already nearing a planned retirement, it’s unlikely that either Gen. Glen D. VanHerck, head of U.S. Northern Command, or Gen. Mark Kelly, head of Air Combat Command, will be the choice at this stage. Also out of the running is Gen. Duke Z. Richardson, head of Air Force Materiel Command, who lacks the operational background essential to the job.

That leaves just a few generals to watch.

The Favorite

Gen. David W. Allvin — Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force 

Allvin has been vice chief since November 2020, shortly after Brown took the top job. A test pilot with experience in more than two dozen aircraft, Allvin gained most of his command experience in air refueling and mobility units. But he has extensive Pentagon and joint experience, including stints in the Strategy, Plans, and Policy directorate of the Joint Staff.

Having begun his vice chief tour operating largely out of public view, he has come out of the shadows in recent months, championing efforts to eliminate barriers to service and speaking about the service’s contributions to Joint-All Domain Command and Control which he has helped spearhead. He also appeared instead of Brown on a panel at the AFA Warfare Symposium with Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Chance Saltzman, Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne Bass, and Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force Towberman. Among the past five Air Chiefs, two—Gen. T. Michael Moseley and Gen. David L. Goldfein—did stints as Vice Chief. 

Contenders

Gen. James B. Hecker — Commander of U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa 

Hecker has overseen USAFE at a pivotal time in Europe, taking over not long after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. His command has been on constant watch, with Airmen and aircraft operating in the skies and along the borders to reassure allies and secure NATO’s eastern flank. Hecker headed Air University prior to taking command at USAFE-AFAFRICA. A fighter pilot who flew F-15s and F-22s, he has commanded at the group, wing, and Numbered Air Force levels. Three of the past seven Chiefs of Staff had commanded USAFE: Gen. Mike Ryan, Gen. John Jumper, and Gen. Mark Welsh.  

Gen. Thomas A. Bussiere — Commander of Air Force Global Strike Command 

As the head of AFGSC, Bussiere oversees the Air Force’s two legs of the nuclear triad, both of which are in the midst of massive modernization efforts that started years ago and will continue into the next decade. Under his command, AFGSC rolled out the new B-21 Raider in December 2022, which will be the “backbone” of the bomber fleet for years to come. Bussiere has flown the F-15, B-1, B-2, and F-22, and led the Eighth and Eleventh Air Forces. He was also vice commander of U.S. Strategic Command. He would be the first Chief ever to ascend from Global Strike Command, established in 2009, and the first bomber pilot to become Chief since Gen. David C. Jones in 1974.   

Gen. Mike Minihan — Commander of Air Mobility Command 

Since taking command of AMC in October 2021, Minihan has gained a reputation for bold, brash, inspirational leadership. His “Mobility Manifesto” address at AFA’s Air, Space, and Cyber conference in September 2022 lit up the crowd and launched an ambitious trajectory to prepare AMC’s Airmen for conflict in the Indo-Pacific. Since then, his experiments have yielded 24- and 36-hour sorties in the KC-46, successful operations with limited aircrew, and this summer, the massive “Mobility Guardian” exercise intended to demonstrate air mobility’s reach across the Pacific region this summer. But Minihan probably lost standing when he garnered international headlines for a memo to AMC Airmen that was leaked to the media in January. The memo suggested war with China was likely in 2025 and urged Airmen to brush up on their marksmanship by practicing aiming for the head. The memo was never intended for public consumption, but the negative publicity could prove problematic in confirmation hearings.

Gen. Jacqueline D. Van Ovost — Commander of U.S. Transportation Command 

Van Ovost, a former test pilot who has flown a dozen aircraft types, would be the first woman ever to be Air Force Chief. Prior to leading TRANSCOM, she headed Air Mobility Command and before that was the Air Force’s Director of Staff at the Pentagon. She headed AMC during the record-breaking noncombatant evacuation operation from Afghanistan in 2021 and has overseen the massive logistical enterprise transporting materiel to Ukraine while at TRANSCOM. Van Ovost has also led a reconsideration of TRANSCOM’s posture in the Pacific, and helped to implement the Global Household Goods Contract for transporting troops’ possessions during moves. Two prior TRANSCOM commanders have gone on to become Chief of Staff—Gen. Ronald Fogleman in 1994, and Gen. Norton A. Schwartz in 2008. 

Gen. Anthony J. Cotton — Commander of U.S. Strategic Command 

Having only arrived at STRATCOM in December 2022, Cotton is a missileer whose prior command at Air Force Global Strike Command lasted less than a year before he was nominated to lead STRATCOM. If selected, he would be the first missileer ever to be Chief of Staff. Cotton’s was previously vice chief at AFGSC. He has commanded an Air Force Space Wing and was president of Air University.  

‘A Proud, Butt-Kicking American Airman’: Biden Introduces Brown as Pick for Chairman

‘A Proud, Butt-Kicking American Airman’: Biden Introduces Brown as Pick for Chairman

It’s official: President Joe Biden has picked an Airman to be his top military adviser.

At 1:52 pm on May 25, Biden walked out of the West Wing and into the Rose Garden alongside Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr. to formally announce he is nominating the Air Force Chief of Staff to become the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Introducing Brown to many Americans who may not know him, Biden had a simple message:

“Gen. Brown is a proud, butt-kicking American Airman.”

Vice President Kamala Harris and Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III stood beside the two men as Biden went on to lay out the reasons he selected Brown after months of anticipation.

“Gen. Brown is a warrior descended from a proud line of warriors,” Biden told the crowd, which included service chiefs and Defense Department leaders. “He knows what it means to be in the thick of battle and how to keep your cool when things get hard.”

Biden then recounted one episode that illustrates Brown’s calm and measured demeanor.

In 1991, Brown was flying an F-16 that caught fire over the Florida Everglades. Forced to eject, he landed far from civilization. Luckily the water was not too high and he was eventually rescued, Brown previously recounted to Air & Space Forces Magazine.

“That’s a lot of fun, huh?” Biden said. “Well, I tell you what, he was back in the cockpit the next week with a new call sign, ‘Swamp Thang.'”

Brown has 3,000 hours of flying experience, including 130 combat hours. The son and grandson of veterans, Brown has command experience in the Middle East, Europe, and, perhaps most importantly, the Indo-Pacific. Prior to assuming his current role, Brown was the commander of Pacific Air Forces.

“He plays to win and that’s obvious,” Biden said. “That mindset is going to be an enormous asset to me as commander-in-chief and to the United States of America as we navigate challenges in the coming years.”

Brown is set to replace Army Gen. Mark A. Milley, subject to confirmation by the Senate. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs does not command any troops but serves as the president’s top military advisor. Brown’s experience in the Pacific, where the Air Force is rapidly adapting, stood out to Biden, the president said.

Through his career, Brown “gained the respect of our allies and partners around the world who regard Gen. Brown as a trusted partner and a top-notch strategist,” Biden added.

In a roughly 15-minute speech, Biden praised Brown’s efforts to modernize the Air Force for a near-peer fight and praised the way Brown has articulated the need to think differently.

“Over the past three years as chief of staff of the Air Force, Gen. Brown has become known for his signature approach, Accelerate Change or Lose,” Biden said.

“Accelerate Change or Lose,” Biden repeated for emphasis. “General, you’re right on. As I’ve often said, our world is at an inflection point where the decisions we make today are going to determine the course of our world for decades to come.”

Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall, who has long-praised Brown as a like-minded thinker, looked on with a smile.

Milley addressed reporters at the Pentagon before the Rose Garden event after a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group and said Brown had “all the knowledge, skills, and attributes” needed to serve as Chairman.

“C.Q. is absolutely superb,” Milley added.

In a lighthearted moment, Milley and other senior military leaders took a group photo after the event—save for Brown, who followed Biden, Harris, and Austin back into the West Wing.

“We’ll photoshop C.Q. in,” Milley quipped.

Brown enjoyed strong support in the Senate when he was nominated for Air Force chief, getting confirmed in a 98-0 vote. And while Sen. Tommy Tuberville is currently blocking unanimous consent votes on senior military promotions because of his objection to the Department of Defense’s policy that funds out-of-state travel for those who seek an abortion, Brown’s new nomination could go to an up-or-down roll call vote, as Milley’s did when he was approved 89-1 in 2019.

“C.Q. is a fearless leader and an unyielding patriot,” Biden said. “I urge the Senate to once again confirm Gen. Brown with the same overwhelming bipartisan support for his new role as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.”

Biden’s announcement came on the third anniversary of the murder of George Floyd at the hands of police officers, which sparked nationwide protests. The president also noted the nation is coming up on the 75th anniversary of the desegregation of the military.

If confirmed by the Senate now, Brown would be the second Black service member to serve as Chairman, following Army Gen. Colin Powell, who served as Chairman from 1989 to 1993.

The George Floyd protests unfolded as Brown was still awaiting confirmation to become the first Black Air Force Chief of Staff, and he released a forceful video at the time recounting his experiences as a Black fighter pilot and officer.

“I’m thinking about the pressure I felt to perform error-free, especially for supervisors I perceived had expected less from me as an African American,” Brown said in the video. “I’m thinking about having to represent by working twice as hard to prove their expectations and perceptions of African Americans were invalid.”

Biden praised the strong nature of Brown’s message at the time after Floyd’s killing.

“It took real backbone, and it struck a chord not only with our military members but with Americans all across the country,” Biden said.

The president said he could rely on Brown to be “a thoughtful, deliberate leader who is unafraid to speak his mind, as someone who will deliver an honest message that needs to be heard, and who will always do the right thing when it’s hard.”

“That’s the number one quality a President needs in a Chairman,” Biden said.

If confirmed by the Senate, Brown will be only the fifth Airman in the 73-year history of the job and the first since Gen. Richard Myers stepped down in 2005.

GAO: Boeing Unlikely to Meet Revised T-7 Schedule

GAO: Boeing Unlikely to Meet Revised T-7 Schedule

The T-7A trainer, already two years behind schedule for production and initial operational capability, will probably see further delays, the Government Accountability Office said in a new report.

And even when the initial production airplanes arrive, they may not meet Air Force requirements because they’re being built before the service signs a contract with Boeing specifying what they should be.

Quoting Air Force officials, the GAO said a new T-7A program schedule developed by Boeing in January is “optimistic, relying on favorable outcomes not supported by past performance,” and that the relationship between the service and the company is “tenuous.”

Even if everything goes right from here on, the GAO said, USAF will have to extend the life of the 60-year-old T-38 trainer because of T-7A delays.

The agency recommended the Air Force conduct a schedule risk assessment to examine the concurrent development, testing, and production in the program, as well as “risks related to contractor management.”

The GAO also urged the service to figure out “under what conditions it would accept production work completed“ before signing a contract for the jets.

Again quoting Air Force officials, the GAO said friction between the service and Boeing is expected to continue to affect the program, especially given Boeing’s mounting losses on it—the Air Force and Boeing already have “differing interpretations” of contract requirements, which may multiply as construction proceeds.

Key problems with the T-7 involve its escape system—which has problems safely ejecting smaller pilots—as well as software and flight controls.

Air Force acquisition executive Andrew Hunter told Congress in April the T-7A won’t achieve IOC until early 2027—missing its initial target of 2024 and slipping beyond a subsequent goal of 2026, which the service and Boeing set late last year.

The delay is due to the Air Force delaying Milestone C—the full-rate production decision—until February 2026, to give more time to fix the escape system and other issues, and test those changes out in flight test, Hunter told Air & Space Forces Magazine in an email.

“We are pursuing risk-reduction activities to mitigate some of these schedule changes,” he said.

Yet even with the extra delays, the GAO report called Boeing’s test schedule is “optimistic,” given that it does not account for any more delays in development or possible re-testing if problems arise at that stage.

Hunter said the Air Force and Boeing “are confident improvements and recent testing are yielding a safe and effective escape system” for the T-7. But until that’s concluded, USAF won’t let test pilots fly the jets. Delays in testing affect other milestones, and the Air Force has previously said it cannot accelerate the T-7A’s test program.

The GAO said it was told the T-7A’s flight test software may have to undergo six or more iterations before it can be considered fully ready.

Boeing built two pre-production prototype T-7As during the T-X Advanced Pilot Training Aircraft competition and has largely completed the first five aircraft that will be used for test flights. But it is also starting to build the first production aircraft before the flight test program even begins.

Given that the escape system and other issues are not resolved—the report notes there have been thousands of changes made to the design since Boeing won the T-X competition in 2018—GAO said the Air Force could wind up paying for airplanes that don’t meet final requirements determined after testing.

Although the Defense Department “concurred” with GAO’s recommendations, the Air Force was not immediately able to comment on when the suggested schedule risk assessment will be completed, or how it will decide whether to accept jets built before requirements have been finalized.

The T-7A was billed from the outset as a revolutionary program, its digital design influencing everything from the aircraft shape and systems to the layout of the factory floor. Boeing brought its two prototype T-Xs from the drawing board to the flightline in under 36 months, and, relying on anticipated cost avoidance, bid as much as $10 billion below what the Air Force thought the trainer fleet and its associated simulators and coursework would cost.

However, Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall said May 22 the digital approach being taken on the T-7A—as well as on Northrop Grumman’s B-21 bomber, and the Next Generation Air Dominance fighter—can’t be expected to radically reduce the time and cost of development, as real-world testing still has to confirm what digital models predict.

“The T-7 is a good example of that,” he said. Digital “doesn’t help you when you’re doing a design that’s different from anything you’ve ever done before. Having it digital doesn’t give you better knowledge of how it’s going to work. You end up having to do testing just as we always have.”

The GAO said the Air Force’s own last schedule risk assessment on the T-7A—conducted in January—didn’t adequately take into account the risk of “overlap between key program phases,” which “magnifies the cost and schedule impact of potential issues discovered during testing.”

Cascading delays, GAO said, increase reliances on the T-38 or fighter jets for training—both costly options. Delays also affect contractor decisions regarding manufacturing, which affects Air Force oversight.

While the Air Force hasn’t yet ordered any jets beyond the five test aircraft, Boeing began producing parts in March 2022 and plans to start building more aircraft in early 2024. But since it hasn’t signed a contract, the usual oversight of production isn’t taking place, the GAO said, noting in the absence of a contract, the Defense Contract Management Agency can’t exercise any oversight, either. There’s no way at this point for the Air Force to know that the parts being built for early production T-7As are of proper quality.

The Air Force “does not have a plan for determining under what conditions it would accept production work completed prior to contract delivery,” the GAO noted.

Boeing is also three years late in providing a complete “bill of materials,” necessary for the Air Force to begin planning its organic maintenance of the trainer, the GAO said. The service is also waiting on other sustainment data from Boeing.

The Air Force doesn’t expect the first production T-7A to be delivered until December 2025 at the earliest.

The T-7A program calls for 351 of the supersonic trainers to be built, along with 46 high-fidelity simulators. The Air Force’s new “Reforge” fighter pilot training overhaul may increase the number of T-7As the service could buy. The development contract calls for up to 475 aircraft.

Airman Dies in Kuwait in Non-Combat Incident

Airman Dies in Kuwait in Non-Combat Incident

An Airman died May 24 while deployed to Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, in support of Operation Inherent Resolve the Pentagon announced May 25. 

Maj. Stephen Khou, 36, died in a non-combat related incident, the Department of Defense said in a statement. The incident is under investigation. 

Khou, a native of Philadelphia, was assigned to the 32nd Weapons Squadron at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev. The 57th Wing declined further comment on the incident. 

The 32nd Weapons Squadron, activated in 2018, instructs officers in the U.S. Air Force Weapons School on cyber warfare operations, providing “graduate-level training to officers in the planning and execution of offensive and defensive cyber warfare operations.” 

According to online records, Khou authored several research papers while at the Air Force Institute of Technology, where he was pursuing a master’s degree. He was a cyberspace operations expert, and his research papers focused primarily on systems security engineering. In 2020, he was named a Joint Forces Headquarters Department of Defense Information Network Defender of the Year for 2019. At the time, he was a captain stationed at Scott Air Force Base,

Khou is the second service member to die in a non-combat incident in Kuwait this week. U.S. Army Central announced May 25 that a soldier was killed in a vehicle accident at Udairi Range. 

The last previous death DOD announced in support of Operation Inherent Resolve was in December 2022, when Marine Corps Staff Sgt. Samuel D. Lecce died in a non-combat incident in Iraq.  

Everything You Need to Know About the Space Force’s Fitness Tracker PT Study

Everything You Need to Know About the Space Force’s Fitness Tracker PT Study

As the Space Force closes in on standards for its ground-breaking health and physical fitness program, USSF announced plans May 24 for an expansive study of thousands of volunteer Guardians to share data from wearable fitness trackers. 

Now through June 30, Guardians will be offered a wearable fitness tracker in exchange for agreeing to be part of the “Continuous Fitness Assessment.” Better still, participants will be exempted from taking the annual Air Force PT test for two years. 

Participants must wear the fitness trackers when they exercise, respond to questionnaires, and consent to share certain data with the Air Force Research Laboratory’s 711th Human Performance Wing, which is partnering to do the study. 

The Space Force aims to rethink conventional annual physical fitness tests that can make or break a career and replace it with a holistic approach to fitness that keeps health a focus year-round. 

Here’s the hard part: Figuring out how to make that work while juggling cybersecurity, privacy, and logistical concerns, said Vice Chief of Space Operations Gen. David D. Thompson in a podcast with Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force Roger A. Towberman.

Now that some of those concerns have been addressed, Space Force leaders must determine what its standards should be.  

“The choice that a Guardian gets to make is essentially whether or not they want to be part of this groundbreaking study that gets the data and gets the analytics that we need to understand how well we want to hold ourselves accountable for our own health and wellness,” said Deputy Chief of Space Operations for Human Capital Katharine Kelley during the podcast. “And then also define long term what the right health and wellness standards need to be for the Space Force, which quite frankly, is one of the mandates that we have from DOD.” 

Towberman said that goal has never changed. “This is a study that allows us to inform those decisions,” he said. “This is not quite the same thing as ‘Hey, we’re starting our continuous fitness assessment now.’ This is a study that allows us to work all of these details out.” 

Who Can Join 

The Space Force wants at least 2,000 Guardians to participate in the study, Towberman said. As many as 6,000 will be allowed to volunteer. Guardians deployed overseas will not be allowed to participate due to security concerns. 

No one will be required to join the study. Kelley stressed in a memo that Guardian volunteering must do so “without influence, compulsion, or pressure from leadership at any level.” 

What Does It Include 

A Space Force spokeswoman told Air & Space Forces Magazine the data the study will look at in particular are: 

  • Cardiovascular intensity minutes, or amount of time with an elevated high heart rate in exercise 
  • One VO2max assessment per month 
  • One-minute maximum repetition pushup test per month 

Guardians will be expected to work out as part of the study. Thompson indicated during the podcast that three workouts per week of roughly 30-45 minutes would be more than sufficient. 

Completion of surveys will be crucial. “Once I’m in the study, there’s really some mandatory things,” Towberman said. “Once I’m in, I can’t not give you the feedback. I can’t not do the questionnaires. I can’t not work out.”

Failure to meet those expectations, which are easily checked on the devices, will end participation, Towberman said: “There are thresholds that will get me asked to depart.” 

Choice of Fitness Trackers 

Guardians will have a choice between two Garmin fitness trackers. 

“We picked the devices we’re offering Guardians for the duration of the research study from the National Security Agency approved personal electronic device list,” the USSF spokeswoman said. “They will be operable with our management systems, performed well in laboratory testing, and provide for protection of study participants’ privacy and data rights.” 

During the podcast, leaders said the decision was made to standardize the data being collected. Towberman indicated that Guardians who already own one of the two models will be allowed to use them. 

Data Security  

Dr. James Christensen, 711th Human Performance Wing product line lead, said during the podcast that Guardians will be able to see all the data the study is collecting, and none of the data will be shared with commanders or senior enlisted leaders. 

“Even while it’s a voluntary study, we’re still exercising a very high degree of care with regards to the members’ cybersecurity, ensuring their privacy and ensuring that their data doesn’t end up getting used in ways that we don’t intend and the member wouldn’t want,” Christensen said. 

While Guardians may wear their fitness devices throughout the day, only data from exercise events will be recorded. Service members will be instructed on how to disable the device’s GPS functions. 

Health Concerns 

Guardians will be able to voluntarily withdraw from the study, Christensen said, and researchers will be on the look out for indicators of Guardians who may be struggling. 

“There are some triggers there for us to recommend that perhaps you shouldn’t proceed in the study, given that it looks like it’s not helping you and we want to make sure we’re taking good care of you,” Christensen said. 

Resilience

The Space Force will also field new Guardian Resilience Teams at every Space Force Base, plus the Military District of Washington, D.C., Joint Base San Antonio, and a virtual team to aid geographically separated units and remote Guardians. 

Those teams will include a holistic health integrator, certified strength and conditioning specialist, licensed mental health provider, and physical therapist, mostly civilians. Kelley said the service is hiring for those positions right now and hopes to complete the process by early 2024. According to a USSF release, the teams could add uniformed mental health specialists and religious support team Airmen in the future. 

Or Take the Test Instead

Guardians opting out of the study must complete the Air Force’s standard PT test between July 1 and Sept. 30. If located at a site deemed in eligible for the study, PT tests will be required three months after the location is deemed ineligible. 

Those opting into the study, then later disenrolled, will be required to complete a PT test within three months after the date of disenrollment. 

5,000 Selected for Master Sergeant, But Promotion Rate Remains Low

5,000 Selected for Master Sergeant, But Promotion Rate Remains Low

Promotions for new master sergeants remained under 20 percent for the third year in a row, as retention held strong and increases in end strength leveled off, the Air Force announced May 25 before the finalized list is released May 31.

Some 4,998 technical sergeants were selected for promotion, out of a total pool 28,831 eligible Airmen. The 17.34 percent promotion rate was the third lowest since 2010, but up 2.5 percentage points from last year, the lowest in at least 14 years.

The full list be published May 31 at 8 a.m. Central time on the Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs home page. 

Retention, which spiked amid the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, has returned to pre-pandemic levels, but with a reduction in overall authorized end strength and an ongoing enlisted grade structure revision that won’t be done until fiscal 2025, there are fewer overall slots.

The restructuring of the enlisted force was driven by concerns about a lack of required experience among some newly promoted Airmen—the result of a force structure model that had become out of balance between lower, middle, and higher grades, according to Col. James Barger, Air Force Manpower Analysis Agency commander. The Air Force’s response has been to slow down promotion allocations for grades E-5 through E-7—all of which saw their lowest promotion rates in years in 2022. 

For example, of 45,991 eligible Senior Airmen, just 9,706 were selected in 2022—a 21.1 percent promotion rate, the lowest in nearly a quarter of a century. Out of 33,935 eligible staff sergeants, only 5,430 became tech sergeants, the fewest in at least a decade.  

In 2013 and 2014, the Air Force saw a significant downturn in promotion rates due to drastic force reductions. Since then, the service has seen significant swings in promotion rates year to year based on retention and end strength.

Air Force E-7 Promotion Rates Over the Years

YearEligiblePromotedPercent Rate
202328,8314,99817.34
202227,2964,04014.80
202124,7214,67618.92
202022,2864,64920.86
201919,4224,73324.37
201820,8666,17629.60
201720,1695,16625.61
201621,5045,01923.34
201523,6195,30122.44
201422,6784,07317.96
201337,6085,65415.03
201219,8095,46427.58
201119,5386,61833.87
201021,8295,42424.85
Brown Set to Be the 5th Air Force Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Who Are the Others?

Brown Set to Be the 5th Air Force Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Who Are the Others?

President Joe Biden has announced he will nominate Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q Brown Jr. to become the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. If confirmed by the Senate, he would be the 21st Chairman in history, just the fifth Airman to hold the position, and the first Air Force general in the job in 18 years.

So who are the other members of this small Air Force club Brown is set to join, and what legacies did they leave behind? Air & Space Forces Magazine compiled a primer.

Gen. Nathan F. Twining, Aug. 15, 1957 – Sept. 30, 1960

air force chairman of the joint chiefs of staff
Air Force Gen. Nathan F. Twining (Department of Defense photo)

The first Airman to serve as the highest-ranking U.S. military officer began his career in 1916, not as an Airman or even as an officer, but as an enlisted infantryman in the Oregon National Guard, “presumably because ‘they had a good rifle range and he liked to shoot,’” according to a Department of Defense biography.

After an accelerated stint at West Point, Twining commissioned as a second lieutenant in November 1918, entered flight school in 1923, became an attack pilot and rose through the ranks to command three separate Air Forces in World War II.

In 1943, Twining and 14 other troops spent six days floating on a pair of life rafts in shark-infested waters in the south Pacific after the B-17 they had been flying on was forced down in bad weather. They were rescued by Navy airplanes, and 10 years later Twining became Air Force Chief of Staff, where he helped develop “nuclear air weapons and the supersonic missiles and jets designed to deliver them” in the belief that Strategic Air Command was the best way to deter communist militaries, according to his biography.

Twining was named Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1957 by President Dwight Eisenhower. The general’s recommendations to deploy troops to the Middle East and the Taiwan Strait helped resolve crises in both areas. As land-based and submarine-launched missiles ushered in new methods of delivering nuclear strikes, Twining led the coordination of joint target assignments, and command and control for those weapons. The general retired in 1960 and died of a heart condition in 1982.

“General Twining—‘Nate’ to his colleagues—was known for his blend of professional competence, personal affability, and a common-sense approach to problems,” according to his obituary in the New York Times.

Gen. George Scratchley Brown, July 1, 1974 – June 20, 1978

air force chairman of the joint chiefs of staff
Air Force Gen. George Scratchley Brown (Department of Defense photo)

Another West Point alum, Brown received the Distinguished Service Cross in 1943 for leading the battered remains of the 93rd Bombardment Group back to Benghazi, Libya, after the lead plane and 10 other B-24 bombers in the 40-plane formation were shot down or crashed during a low-level bombing raid against oil refineries at Ploesti, Romania. 

Brown went on to command transport and fighter units and Air Force Systems Command before becoming Air Force Chief of Staff in 1973, where he worked to replace the B-52 bomber with the B-1. The general became Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1974, where he advised the president during strategic weapons limitation negotiations with the Soviet Union; the fall of the South Vietnamese government; the seizure of the U.S. merchant ship Mayaguez; a North Korean attack on U.S. and South Korean troops cutting down a tree in the Demilitarized Zone; and the transfer of ownership of the Panama Canal from the U.S. to Panama.

Though Brown played a significant role in sensitive negotiations, he also started an international controversy when he said in public remarks that Jews “own the banks and the newspapers in this country,” for which he was rebuked by President Gerald Ford and issued an apology, according to one biography. Brown also made deprecatory remarks about Israel, Britain, and Iran. The general retired due to cancer-related health complications in 1978 and died six months later. He was remembered as a “sincere, straightforward, and dedicated man,” by Secretary of Defense Harold Brown. 

Gen. David C. Jones, June 21, 1978 – June 18, 1982

air force chairman of the joint chiefs of staff
Air Force Gen. David C. Jones. (Department of Defense photo)

Growing up in Minot, N.D., Jones rode his bicycle to the nearby airfield and dreamed of becoming a combat pilot, according to one biography. He got his wish—operating Catalina flying boats as part of a rescue squadron stationed in Japan after World War II; flying more than 300 hours in combat over North Korea as a bomber pilot; then moving on to tankers and later fighters as he rose through the ranks and finally became Air Force Chief of Staff in 1974, where he advocated for developing high-tech weapons and reducing headquarters staffs.

Starting in 1978, Jones’ four-year tenure as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was marked by a push for closer cooperation between the services, especially after Operation Eagle Claw, the failed 1980 mission to rescue U.S. hostages taken captive in Iran by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Mechanical problems and poor coordination led to eight dead U.S. service members, two crashed aircraft, no hostages rescued, and “an especially humiliating blow to American prestige,” according to the New York Times. 

Jones “bore the brunt of criticism” for the mission’s failure, according to his military biography, but the Senate confirmed his tenure for a second term as chairman, during which he became “increasingly dissatisfied with the operation of the joint system.” He launched a sweeping review of the structural problems in the joint system, which later helped inform the 1986 Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act. Jones died in 2013 at the age of 92.

Gen. Richard B. Myers, Oct. 1, 2001 – Sept. 30, 2005 

air force chairman of the joint chiefs of staff
Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers (Department of Defense photo)

Myers cut his teeth as an F-4 fighter pilot in Vietnam, where he flew night bombing missions on enemy supply routes, coordinated airstrikes as a F-4 Forward Air Controller (a.k.a. ‘Fast FAC’), detected and suppressed enemy air defenses in Wild Weasel missions, and received the Distinguished Flying Cross. 

He went on to command fighter and training units in North Carolina, Florida, and Virginia, help move weapons acquisitions through Capitol Hill, work with allies in Europe and East Asia, and lead Pacific Air Forces, U.S. Space Command, and North American Aerospace Defense Command against the backdrop of the post-Cold War defense drawdown.

After a stint as Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Myers became Chairman on Oct. 1, 2001, right at the start of the Global War on Terror. He was involved in planning the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and was among the military planners criticized for the counterinsurgency quagmire U.S. troops found themselves in shortly afterwards. Myers has since defended the decision to invade Iraq based on the intelligence available at the time, as well as the military side of the planning process. Still, he urged greater whole-of-government coordination as necessary to succeed in counterinsurgency conflicts.

“We don’t have a good mechanism to focus all of our instruments of national power on a problem,” Myers told National Defense University’s PRISM journal in 2011. “[T]hese other instruments of national power—the diplomacy, economic, informational—have to play their roles as well. It’s really frustrating that we couldn’t harness these in a way to focus more effectively in Iraq.”