Army Seeks New Space Capabilities for the ‘Tactical Edge’

Army Seeks New Space Capabilities for the ‘Tactical Edge’

The Army is doubling down on giving Soldiers better access to space capabilities—and insisting none of their efforts to advantage their troops will duplicate work by the Space Force. 

“Our top priority is: How do we deliver that capability responsive to the warfighter?” said Lt. Gen. Sean A. Gainey, head of Army Space and Missile Defense Command, during the Association of the U.S. Army’s annual conference. “How do we continue to get after more tactical solutions that allow our Soldiers to maneuver around on a battlefield—different areas, different times, [with] smaller weight platforms.” 

Col. Peter Atkinson, space division chief at Army Headquarters, said the Army is investing in new space-based gear for communications, intelligence, and position, navigation, and timing. 

“This year, we started the fielding for mounted and dismounted assured PNT receivers,” Atkinson said. “And in [fiscal] ’25 we’re going to scale that across the Army, giving [Soldiers] the most capable, most reliant PNT receivers the force has seen.” 

Atkinson said the Army is also “moving out” to provide Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Nodes (TITAN) ground stations to enhance situational awareness and give Soldiers targeting data from satellites and high-altitude assets. And the Army is experimenting with new satellite communications terminals that will be able to connect to multiple satellite constellations, giving troops more options and increased reliability. 

The Army effort mirrors similar programs elsewhere: The Space Force is seeking $228 million to fund research and development of its own hybrid SATCOM terminal in 2025, the Navy has a program called Satellite Terminal (transportable) Non-Geostationary, or STtNG, and the Air Force Research Laboratory is pursuing something called Global Lightning.

Lawmakers complained earlier this year that the military services need to better coordinate these efforts.

But Atkinson said the Army is working with the Space Force as it plans for new equipment. 

“Everything we do is in partnership with Space Force,” he said. “We want to make sure that all of the efforts of Army Space are complementary. So we’re making sure to reduce any redundancy, duplicative efforts, and that’s been a major focus through the requirements process.” 

The Army released its Army Space Vision for multi-domain operations earlier this year, including plans to increase its space specialists and to establish a new enlisted career field. That prompted a spirited debate with experts from the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, who argued in multiple op-eds that the Army is duplicating the Space Force’s effort, wasting resources, undermining cooperation, and favoring its own forces over joint capabilities.  

At AUSA, Atkinson did not directly reference those critiques, but he did reiterate the Army’s case for keeping its own native space capabilities. 

“It’s really important: Since the establishment of Space Force, what is the Army’s role?” Atkinson said. “It’s really critical for the Army to dominate on the land domain, to integrate multi-domain effects and multi-domain capabilities and … make sure that the warriors on the tactical edge have access to those capabilities.” 

Col. Don Brooks, Space and Missile Defense Center of Excellence commandant, discusses the role of Army space in multidomain operations alongside Lt. Gen. Sean Gainey, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command commanding general (right); Command Sgt. Maj. Maurice Tucker, 1st Space Brigade command sergeant major (left); and Col. Pete Atkinson, Army Space Division chief, G-3.5.7 (second to right) at the Association of the United States Army’s Annual Meeting and Exposition in Washington, D.C. on Oct. 15. (Photo by Lira Frye)

Col. Donald K. Brooks, commandant of the Army’s Space and Missile Defense Center of Excellence, said space-focused Soldiers are needed to ensure space capabilities are integrated into land forces to ensure warfighters have access to space capabilities on the battlefield. 

“Army Space is land-centric, providing scalable, mobile, expeditionary and forward postured forces in contested and austere environments that are able to keep pace with maneuver forces in support of large-scale combat operations in the multi-domain environment,” he said. 

“Our primary focus is to go forward into the theaters,” added Command Sergeant Major Maurice Tucker of the 1st Space Brigade. 

The Army has held to this view since at least 2021, when Brooks, then commander of the 1st Space Brigade, told Air & Space Forces Magazine that if a unit has “roles and responsibilities at the tactical and operational level, I think it could be retained and should be retained.” 

But Charles Galbreath and Jennifer Reeves, both retired colonels and now senior fellows at the Mitchell Institute, countered that argument in a September essay, saying it reflects an “underlying mindset … that if the Army doesn’t directly control it, they can’t trust it to deliver their desired effects.”

“While it is understandable that an Army commander would feel this way, this is the antithesis of joint integration at a time when no one service will ever fight by itself,” they wrote. 

Brooks said the Army and Space Force continue to have a strong joint relationship. “We’re very complementary to each other, and how we fight across the tactical, operational and strategic levels of warfare, on the operational side and the institutional side as well,” he said. 

Air Force to Help Maintainers Better Understand Mishaps—If They Can Keep It Secret

Air Force to Help Maintainers Better Understand Mishaps—If They Can Keep It Secret

The Air Force is rolling out a new initiative aimed at helping aircraft maintainers prevent mishaps, so long as they sign a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) to keep it to themselves.

Under a new annual privileged safety information (PSI) training, Active, Reserve, and Air National Guard maintainers across the service would be prepared to receive the full picture of mishap events—including factors, findings, causes, and recommendations—so that they have a better understanding of what caused them. After the training, maintainers would have to sign an NDA, a contract not to share confidential information.

“The confidentiality provided under Safety Privilege underpins the success of our mishap prevention program by allowing Airmen and Guardians to provide a full accounting of mishap events without danger of disciplinary action or public release,” Air Force spokesperson Ann Stefanek told Air & Space Forces Magazine in an email. 

“Without privilege, we don’t quickly get to the root cause of a mishap, and mishap prevention is critical to mission readiness and our national security,” she added.

The NDA requirements are common in the aircrew community, where PSI training and briefings “quickly instill lessons learned across the force by confidentially sharing mishap data,” Stefanek said. Air Force Chief of Safety Maj. Gen. Sean M. Choquette pushed to expand the training to maintainers in August in response to an uptick in aviation maintenance-related mishaps, Stefanek explained.

“Annual safety privilege training will be provided to allow access to mishap data and ensure protection of the data,” she said. “Installation safety shops will manage the process and ensure maintenance-related mishaps and trends relevant to the unit’s mission or aircraft are shared.”

No one can be required to sign the NDA, Stefanek added, but those who don’t sign it would not be allowed to access any PSI and “would not be as fully equipped to help prevent mishaps and injuries.”

A U.S. Air Force maintainer works inside the air intake of a Norwegian air force F-35 at Ramstein Air Base, Germany. NATO countries are now integrating to be ready for future conflicts. (Air & Space Forces Magazine photo by Chris Gordon)

The popular unofficial Facebook page Air Force amn/nco/snco first shared news of the training last month, and Air Force Times verified the reports Oct. 14. The training comes amid a yearslong trend where news of aircraft mishaps often first appears in photos posted to social media, particularly the Air Force amn/nco/snco page.

“Perhaps the Air Force is tired of accidents getting out and Congress, Media and the Public demanding answers,” the page’s moderator wrote in the initial post about the PSI training and the NDA requirement.

Stefanek did not immediately respond when asked by Air & Space Forces Magazine to provide a copy of the NDA maintainers would have to sign; nor when asked if the new training and NDAs are also aimed at reducing the number of photos of aircraft mishaps that wind up on social media. But even if they are, one crew chief said the training could help maintainers gain a better understanding of what causes mishaps.

“I think it will aid in obtaining the full picture as a lot comes with a mishap,” the maintainer told Air & Space Forces Magazine on the condition of anonymity. “By that I mean major mishaps being a ‘Swiss cheese’ effect, and usually not due to one major misstep but an accumulation of events or missteps that can build into a perfect storm.”

Maintenance training is sometimes one of those missteps. After a contractor walked into the moving propeller of an MQ-9 drone during ground tests last year, an Air Force investigation found she was not properly trained on how to approach a running aircraft, had received conflicting guidance about the no-enter zones around the drone, and was unfamiliar with the handheld device she was operating at the time of the accident.

By making the entire account of a mishap more readily available, the Air Force could hopefully prevent future accidents, Stefanek said.

“The aircraft maintenance career field has never regularly received this type of training, and that’s a gap in our hazard and mishap mitigation effort,” she said. “When it’s happened in the past, it’s generally been at the local level only, so those lessons learned are harder to implement Air Force-wide.

“NDAs are already required for access to PSI,” Stefanek added. “This requirement is an effort to bring aviation maintainers into the same trusted fold to prevent mishaps.”

All 6 Air Task Forces Now Activated; Combat Wings Will Follow

All 6 Air Task Forces Now Activated; Combat Wings Will Follow

The Air Force activated the last of its first six Air Task Forces last week, breaking new ground it its plan for how the Air Force deploys forces overseas.

Air Force Global Strike Command activated the 21st Air Task Force at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, on Oct. 8, and Air Force Special Operations Command activated the 11th Air Task Force the same day at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz. The other four Air Task Forces stood up at various Air Mobility Command and Air Combat Command bases last month.

After years of “crowdsourcing” deployments and assembling deployed units piecemeal overseas, Air Force leaders are shifting to a system where Airmen deploy as units, having already trained and worked together.  

Air Task Forces are only an interim step in that shift, however. The long-term aim is to build two dozen Deployable Combat Wings, command elements organized to lead forces into combat theaters. Instead of drawing Airmen from 60 or more commands into a single deployed unit, the ATFs and DCWs will train and deploy as a unit, developing relationships and trust ahead of time. This builds on an earlier experiment, in which the Air Force sent so-called Expeditionary Air Bases overseas beginning about a year ago. 

By the fall of 2026, Deployable Combat Wings will begin to replace the ATFs, providing full teams that should be able to pick up and deploy from just one base.

The change has more to do with how deploying units are assembled than how they train. “We’re still training for wartime tasks, but we are training more together and that’s the distinction between the ATF and the current Expeditionary Air Base,” said Col. Thomas Walsh, the new 21st Air Task Force commander.  

Each Air Task Force will have four elements: 

  • A command team with expeditionary air staff and special staff that work directly for the commander
  • A combat air base squadron to handle base support 
  • One or more mission-generation force elements, such as a fighter, bomber squadron, or special warfare squadron, to provide combat power 
  • Mission-sustainment teams to support each mission-generation force element, including all sustainment and protection forces. 

The 21st Air Task Force’s command element and its combat air base squadron, commanded by Lt. Col. Nathaniel White, are both located at Dyess Air Force Base. 

“The 21st CABS has the responsibility to integrate the functions that you would normally see within a mission support group, along with airfield operations, munitions, and medical, to become the unit of action,” White said, noting that the unit will include personnel at Joint Base Charleston, S.C., as well.

The 11th Air Task Force stood up in July at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz., and held its formal ceremony Oct. 8, with Col. Brett Cassidy taking command.

“The typical timeline for activation is often on the order of a couple—or even several—years. Yet, here we are after only a few months,” said Cassidy. “Our rapid activation represents Airmen aggressively driving forward the vision of our leadership.”

  • Air Mobility Command activated the 12th Air Task Force at Scott Air Force Base, Ill., in September 
  • Air Combat Command activated the 13th Air Task Force at Joint Base San Antonio, Texas; the 22nd Air Task Force at Fairchild Air Force Base, Wash.; and the 23rd Air Task Force at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, N.C., in September. 

The first three ATFs will be ready to deploy by October 2025, and the next three will be in line to relieve them six months later, in April 2026. By activating now, the units’ Airmen will join into the new deployment rotations known as the Air Force Force Generation model, or “AFFORGEN.” The model cycles units through six-month phases of increasingly complex training until they are in zone for a six-month “commit” phase. Then the cycle repeats, beginning with a reset phase. 

Far-Flung Guardsmen Still in Southeast as Hurricane Recovery Continues

Far-Flung Guardsmen Still in Southeast as Hurricane Recovery Continues

Army National Guardsmen and Air National Guardsmen from as far as New York and Alaska deployed to the southeastern U.S. in recent days in response to Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton.

Milton made landfall Oct. 9, just two weeks after Helene, which made landfall on Sept. 26 and devastated western North Carolina. Soldiers with the Florida National Guard were surprised to find themselves helping with another state’s disaster relief.

“Florida typically receives the donor states to us, due to being the first impacted state,” Lt. Col. Brian Cooper, commander of the Florida Guard’s 1-111th General Support Aviation Battalion, said in an Oct. 13 press release. “This one was historic because of the size and nature of this hurricane, affecting numerous states at a great deal of speed. So, what we felt as an impact [in Florida] ultimately impacted those states as well.”

Florida troops traveled to North Carolina under the Emergency Management Assistance Compact, which lets National Guard units from different states help each other out. They hauled food and water, conducted search and rescue, and cleared roads of fallen trees and debris so that first responders could get through. 

The Guardsmen from other states make a big difference when Guardsmen in the state being helped can’t mobilize because their own houses have been destroyed, the press release noted. But the Florida troops had to get back home fast to prepare for Milton as it rapidly grew stronger.

national guard milton
Florida Army National Guard Soldiers with the 1-111th General Support Aviation Battalion conduct flight operations in Florida amid Hurricane Milton response efforts Oct. 10, 2024. (Courtesy photo)

“We had to work very fast to get our Soldiers back home so they could pack up [for extended duty] and be here in Orlando by 6 p.m. on Sunday and integrate with the 856th by Monday morning,” 2nd Lt. Brandi Ruth, a quartermaster officer with the Florida National Guard, said in an Oct. 9 release. “The 356th’s Soldiers had about two or three days of downtime—at the most—after Helene, and not everybody got that downtime.”

Spc. Yetel Fugon, an automated logistics specialist with the Florida National Guard, voiced a similar experience.

“This activation is kind of crazy,” she said in the same release. “There are a lot more missions coming through than I’ve seen with [Hurricanes] Debby and Idalia. [Temporary flood control devices] are much needed and there were thousands of requests for tarps after people’s roofs were damaged during Helene.”

More than 3,000 Guardsmen from more than 20 states arrived to help distribute food and water, clear roads, and search and rescue, a separate release noted

“Their help has been extremely beneficial,” Army Lt. Col Arthur Gaines, Florida Joint Force Headquarters Deputy Director of Military Support, said in the release. “The reason we sent out such a large call is because we were preparing for a Category 5 storm and fortunately for us it did not impact Florida to that scale.”

Originally the response included 50 Alaska National Guardsmen, but only 13 made the trip after the hurricane’s impact was less disastrous than anticipated, according to Alaska news station KTUU. Closer to Florida, the New York Air National Guard’s 105th Airlift Wing used one of its C-17 transport jets to fly 41 New York Army National Guard Soldiers and 10 Humvees to the Sunshine State to help with the recovery effort. 

Also from New York Air National Guard were Pararescuemen from the 106th Rescue Wing, some of whom flew in on one of the wing’s HC-130 transport planes. Other aircraft included at least two UH-60 helicopters from Louisiana; one from Virginia, and a CH-47 helicopter from the Colorado National Guard.

New York Air National Guardsmen from the 106th Rescue Wing respond to Hurricane Milton. (Facebook photo/106th Rescue Wing)

In total, the joint resources sent to Florida included 31 UH-60, HH-60, CH-47 and UH-72 helicopters, over 570 high-water vehicles, 13 boats, thousands of troops, and dozens of trucks, according to one release.

“The FLNG has been graced with an incredible show of support across Guard Nation, and we are truly grateful for the willingness, responsiveness and flexibility displayed by our partner states,” the Florida National Guard said in a statement.

In total, about 9,000 Guardsmen from 20 states including Florida responded, according to Maj. Gen. John D. Haas, Adjutant General of Florida. Together, they rescued 330 people and 39 animals; cleared 2,316 miles of road and 5,989 cubic yards of debris; provided 796,248 meals ready to eat; 992,124 boxes of water; 54,000 tarps; and 38,377 bags of ice.

It’s been a busy few months for the Florida Guard, who also responded to Hurricane Debby in August and took part in a major training exercise right before that. 

“We’re tired. I’m not going to lie,” Col. Blake Heidelberg, director of military support, Florida National Guard, said in an Oct. 12 release. “We’re worn down and we’d like a break.”

But the work continues in Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and southwestern Florida, where more than 11,000 National Guard Soldiers and Airmen were still conducting Milton and Helene relief missions as of Oct. 13. Guardsmen are delivering food, water, and generators, as well as hay for livestock, and helping locate the remains of storm victims.

More than 755 people were rescued in North Carolina alone, 219 of whom were hoisted to hovering helicopters. 

“We train for situations like this, but actually being out there, saving lives and removing people from dangerous conditions really hits home,” Florida National Guardsman 1st Sgt. Pedro Montero said in a release. “Our Soldiers are dedicated to helping the community, and there’s no greater honor than stepping in when people need us most. These aren’t just strangers we’re helping — these are our neighbors, our families.”

milton
Soldiers assigned to Alpha Company, 1st Battalion, 124th Infantry Regiment, 53rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team, deliver water, meals and non-perishable goods to senior citizens in the Spanish Lake community in Port St. Lucie, Florida, Oct. 11. (U.S. Air Force photo by Tech Sgt. Chelsea Smith)
Allvin Talks Up Speed with Indo-Pacific Air Chiefs During Visit to Region

Allvin Talks Up Speed with Indo-Pacific Air Chiefs During Visit to Region

As the U.S. Air Force leans into its reforms to better deter the People’s Republic of China, the service’s top officer is pitching his ideas at a meeting with his Asian counterparts at the Air Force Forum in Tokyo, which runs Oct. 14-16.

Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin made the presentation during a weeklong tour of the Pacific with Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force David A. Flosi, which has already included stops in California, Hawaii, and Guam.

“If I look at the future of conflict, one of the attributes I am focused on is speed—the speed of recognition, the speed of decisions, the speed of action,” Allvin said during a conference panel, underscoring a theme he has emphasized during his first year as CSAF.

Allvin has often framed speed as a quality the U.S. Air Force needs to emphasize in policy-making, acquisition, and military operations. The idea is to empower Airmen to react quickly on their own rather than waiting for instruction from above.

The Tokyo meeting of air chiefs drew more than 20 senior leaders from Pacific nations, Canada, and France, a European nation and U.S. ally that has expressed a particular desire to operate in the region. Pacific Air Forces commander Gen. Kevin B. Schneider is also attending the session.

Air Force leaders say other nations are increasingly aligned with Washington in light of China’s military buildup and persistent threats from North Korea, whose nuclear capabilities are expanding. Allvin referred to alliances as the “price of admission” to tackling future threats.

“The ability for all of us to see and recognize the environment—to be able to work with each other and have the dialogue at the speed of the battle and operate as one—that will be the key,” Allvin said. “We need true interoperability. That requires the will of all the nations here to work out systems interoperability, remove policy barriers, and expand information exchanges to achieve a common operating picture so we can all respond at speed.”

Japan, which is hosting the conference, is one ally which is making tangible progress toward augmenting its military capabilities. Washington and Tokyo have agreed to elevate U.S. Forces Japan to a major command that will initially be led by a three-star general and will work more closely with Japan’s armed forces.

Allvin held a bilateral meeting with the new Japanese defense minister Gen Nakatani. Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III is scheduled to meet with Nakatani on the sidelines of the meeting of G7 defense ministers in Italy later this week.

Japan is part of the so-called First Island Chain off the coast of mainland Asia, which also includes Taiwan and stretches south to the Philippines. It houses key American air bases such as Kadena Air Base on Okinawa, where U.S. fighters are stationed.

The U.S. is still heavily reliant on bases on its own territory to protect power in the Pacific, specifically Guam, the U.S. territory in the western Pacific that houses Anderson Air Force Base. That base, which Allvin and Flosi visited before traveling to Tokyo, is home to the Air Force’s largest conventional war reserve materiel stockpile and serves as a staging area for Air Force bombers and other American military aircraft operating in the region.

“The logistics capabilities of Andersen will keep U.S. and joint airpower in the fight, showcasing our deterrence efforts and ability to protect the Indo-Pacific,” Brig. Gen. Thomas Palenske, 36th Wing commander, said during the visit, according to an Air Force release.

The service says Allvin and Flosi will make additional stops in the region during their trip, which concludes Oct. 18.

Army Leaders: Base Defense Must Grow to Meet Air Force Demand

Army Leaders: Base Defense Must Grow to Meet Air Force Demand

The Army is expanding and transforming its air and missile defense forces, in part to meet the needs of Air Force plans for dispersing to an expanded network of air bases across the Indo-Pacific, senior officials said Oct. 14. But just how much protection it can provide remains to be determined. 

Under the concept of Agile Combat Employment, the Air Force wants to disperse smaller teams of Airmen and aircraft to operate from remote or austere locations. The idea is to make it more difficult for China to target American airpower in a potential fight, as the Air Force moves its planes from base to base. More bases will require more base defense, though. 

For more than a year now, the Air Force and Army have been working on that challenge.  

Previously, the Army focused on theater-level air defenses such as the Patriot and Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) systems. But there are only so many of those expensive systems to go around, and the Army wants to get more flexible, leaders said during a panel discussion at the annual Association of the U.S. Army conference.

“We have relied too long on the Patriot system as the centric system to air and missile defense,” said Lt. Gen. Sean A. Gainey, head of U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command. 

“It’s absolutely critical that we grow the force structure to meet the demand that we can’t keep up with, both from [combatant commands] and all the hot spots around the world, in addition to the fact that we see that demand growing, particularly given the partnership with the Air Force as they’re looking to employ Agile Combat Employment, for example, in the Indo-Pacific region,” added Undersecretary of the Army Gabe Camarillo. 

Camarillo is playing a lead role in that partnership, he said, working with his counterpart in Air Force Undersecretary Melissa Dalton. Both services’ vice chiefs, Army Gen. James J. Mingus and Air Force Gen. James C. “Jim” Slife, are also coordinating. 

“We have met several times together and developed the right teams working together at the operational level to kind of flesh this out,” Camarillo said. “And ultimately what it will do is provide some specificity on how we will move forward to implement and operationalize our cooperation in this effort.” 

Camarillo’s comments echo Dalton’s responses to Air & Space Forces Magazine this summer, when she noted that the two sides are working on “defining the specific requirements and timing and sequencing of how we’re going to pull those pieces together.” 

Yet while Dalton made clear that base defense and air defense are traditional Army missions, Army leaders have raised concerns about their ability to be everywhere the Air Force wants to go. 

“I think that’s the biggest issue that we have to manage with the Air Force is, how are we going to try to meet the needs that they may have in the Indo-Pacific while also continuing to protect forces in the Middle East or other places?” Army Secretary Christine Wormuth said last month during an event hosted by the Stimson Center. 

At AUSA, Camarillo also seemed to suggest there will be limits. 

“Traditionally, we have the assets, and we’re growing the force structure to be able to do it,” he said. “Now, where we defend, in what quantities, and with which capabilities is part of the analysis that’s going on right now with the Air Force, and it has been going on.” 

Those calculations may also change over time as the Army looks to modernize and grow its integrated and air missile defense enterprise, which has surged into the spotlight thanks to lessons learned from conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, where the widespread use of small drones and missiles tests the limits of traditional base defense systems.

“Even 10 years ago, Army air and missile defense as a portfolio was probably subordinate in terms of the amount of investment to things like aviation, combat vehicles, etc. Now it’s, I think, the highest overall, if not close to the highest,” said Camarillo. 

In fiscal 2025, for example, the service is requesting some $5.6 billion across the portfolio, particularly focused on four main modernization efforts—the Indirect Fire Protection Capability System, the Integrated Battle Command System, the Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense System, and the Maneuver Short Range Air Defense system. 

“As many people know, one signature modernization effort in a branch is normally a huge, significant deal. To be modernizing four key components of an air and missile defense architecture kill chain is huge,” said Maj. Gen. Frank Lozano, program executive officer for missiles and space. 

CAMP BUEHRING, Kuwait – A 1st Security Forces Assistance Brigade (SFAB) Soldier uses a Drone Defender to capture and control a drone as its flying, Mar. 6, 2018. The Drone Defender uses an electromagnetic pulse to disable its target and has a range of 600 meters. (U.S. Army photo by Mr. Brent Thacker)

Earlier this year, the Army also revealed plans to revamp its force structure, adding some 7,500 air defense billets and new units for everything from Patriot systems to counter-unmanned aerial system batteries.

With those additions, the service wants to be able to respond better to demands from the Air Force and combatant commands. 

“The force structure that we’re building and growing is tailorable, it’s adaptable, and it is able to flexibly meet whatever needs we have in any hotspot in the world,” Camarillo said. 

US Steps Up Pressure on ISIS with Airstrikes on Training Camps in Syria

US Steps Up Pressure on ISIS with Airstrikes on Training Camps in Syria

The U.S. military carried out airstrikes against Islamic State training camps in Syria on Oct. 11, U.S. Central Command announced. 

The airstrikes came amid concerns that the militant group is trying to rebuild its capabilities following its defeat in 2019 by the U.S. and its regional allies, the Syrian Democratic Forces. 

CENTCOM said in a statement it believes the strikes were successful and does not believe there were any civilian casualties.

“The strikes will disrupt the ability of ISIS to plan, organize, and conduct attacks against the United States, its allies and partners, and civilians throughout the region and beyond,” CENTCOM said in a statement, referring to the group by its acronym.

The U.S. operation follows two raids in Syria in September, which killed upwards of 60 militants, including “multiple senior leaders of the terrorist organizations of ISIS and Hurras al-Din, an Al Qaeda affiliate,” CENTCOM previously announced. Those attacks included a Sept. 16 “large-scale airstrike” on multiple ISIS training camps in central Syria, CENTCOM said.

The recent U.S. airstrikes are part of a “clear intensification” of the American campaign against the Islamic State group in recent weeks, Charles Lister of the Middle East Institute noted in a post on social media.

The U.S. has announced it is ending Operation Inherent Resolve—the campaign against the Islamic State group—and will transition to a “bilateral security partnership” with Iraq by September 2025. Iraq’s prime minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani is under domestic political pressure to wind down the U.S. presence.

“We’ve had great success in territorially defeating ISIS in the core regions of Iraq and Syria. However, we are all very aware that with ISIS, you can say [they’re] down, but they’re never quite out,” a senior administration official told reporters in September. The official said the fight against ISIS “something that is ongoing every day, and that will very much continue in the future.”

The U.S. has some 2,500 troops in Iraq and around 900 in Syria, according to the Pentagon. U.S. officials have not said how the end of Operation Inherent Resolve mission in Iraq will affect U.S. troops levels. 

The agreement with Iraq will enable the U.S. to sustain its presence in neighboring Syria, where the American maintains outposts to help train local partner forces. That arrangement with Iraq will last at least until September 2026.

The U.S. campaign against the Islamic State group has been hampered by Iranian-backed militia groups’ attacks on U.S. troops, including the killing in late January of three U.S. Soldiers at Tower 22 in Jordan, which supports the Al Tanf Garrison just across the border in eastern Syria. Over 40 troops were injured, including three Airmen from the 129th Rescue Wing of the California Air National Guard, who recently received the Purple Heart.

The U.S. conducted large-scale airstrikes against 85 targets in Iraq and Syria in early February that slowed down militia attacks, over 180 of which have occurred since last October.

“It’s less acute now than it was in the period between November ’23 to February ’24 where we were in contact daily at our bases against everything from mortars to UAS,” referring to one-way attack drones, a senior defense official told Air & Space Forces Magazine of the militia attacks, though the official noted attacks still continue.

The U.S. also has had to deal with harassment from Russian air forces in Syria in recent years. Russia damaged two U.S. MQ-9s with flares in July 2023, a year that often saw Russia engage in what the U.S. officials said were dangerous intercepts of manned and unmanned U.S. aircraft and overflying U.S. troops and partner forces with armed aircraft. That activity has also subsided for the most part.

The U.S. has generally operated in the eastern part of Syria, though the U.S. occasionally flies drones in central or western Syria for counterterrorism missions.

“They’ll do intercepts on our MQ-9s and things like that if they’re flying further west than they want or they will just intentionally violate the airspace that we’ve agreed upon is our operating areas—they’ll just buzz through to make a point is what we assess that is, as opposed to directly threatening troops on the ground,” the senior defense official said.

Western officials have cautioned that the Islamic State group remains a major concern despite the evolution of the U.S. mission against the group in Iraq. Along with al Qaeda, the Islamic State and its offshoots of affiliates are a “resurgent” threat to Britain and the West, the chief of the U.K. MI5 spy agency Ken McCallum told reporters last week.

“After a few years of being pinned well back, they’ve resumed efforts to export terrorism,” McCallum said.

Pentagon Spending Big to Counter Cheap Drones

Pentagon Spending Big to Counter Cheap Drones

The U.S. military is spending big bucks to find more systems that can counter cheap drones.

Anduril Industries has received a $250 million contract to supply an unidentified U.S. military service with “more than 500” Roadrunner-M counter-drone systems and associated Pulsar electronic warfare systems, the company said.

The disclosure comes a week after the Pentagon announced that its “Replicator II” effort will focus on counter-unmanned aerial systems, though isn’t clear if Roadrunner fulfills any Replicator requirement.

Under the contract, Anduril will start delivering the weapons starting in the last quarter of this calendar year through the end of 2025. The system is based on Anduril’s Roadrunner vertical takeoff and landing UAS, and the two have high modular commonality, the company said. The Roadrunner was developed by Anduril with its own funds, and the company said it went from “an idea to a combat-validated and fieldable solution in less than two years, which is much faster than most traditional contractor timelines.”

The Roadrunner-M carries a high explosive and can intercept UAS at high subsonic speed. If it is not necessary to detonate the system, it can be safely landed and re-used. The company called the system “the world’s first recoverable explosive weapon.”

As an interceptor, the Roadrunner-M “can rapidly identify, intercept, and destroy an array of aerial threats that are up to 100 times more expensive, or be recovered and re-used at near-zero cost.”

The system “will be deployed to operational sites in priority regions where U.S. forces face significant UAS threats, further enhancing U.S. air defense capabilities at the tactical edge,” Anduril said in a press release.

It isn’t clear from the announcement whether the Pulsar is intended to jam or disable a drone or perform some broader electronic warfare mission.

Roadrunner-M has been deployed operationally in a combat evaluation since January of this year, and Pulsar has been deployed in similar assessments since August of 2023, Anduril said.

The program is one of Anduril’s many new efforts designed to “support defense innovation [and] provide rapid, scalable solutions to safeguard U.S. forces.” The company recently unveiled its “Bolt” UAS  and “Barracuda” family of low-cost, modular cruise missiles. It is one of two competitors for the Air Force’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft Increment 1 contract.

The company said Roadrunner M is defined as “a new class of recoverable, ground-based air defense weapon.” Its twin-jet propulsion and VTOL capability pairs “high subsonic speed with exceptional stability and agility.” It is designed to be “future-proof” because it can carry modular payloads for a “broad set of missions and can be constantly updated to meet the threats of tomorrow.”

Anduril’s revelation came after a Sept. 27 memo from Defense Secretary Lloyd J.Austin III said that the second phase of the Pentagon’s “Replicator” initiative—aimed at large-scale production of autonomous platforms—“will tackle the warfighter priority of countering the threat posed by small uncrewed aerial systems (C-sUAS) to our most critical installations and force concentrations.”

The expectation is “that Replicator 2 will assist with overcoming challenges we face in the areas of production capacity, technology innovation, authorities, policies, open system architecture and system integration, and force structure,” Austin wrote. He wants a “meaningful” operational capability within 24 months of securing funding from Congress for the effort.

The project will “leverage the work of the Counter Uncrewed Systems Warfighter Senior Integration Group, and collaborate closely with other ongoing efforts.”

Space Force X-37 Aerobraking Might Inform Future Satellite Design

Space Force X-37 Aerobraking Might Inform Future Satellite Design

“Watch me do this kickflip” is essentially what top Space Force officials said on Oct. 10 when they announced the secretive X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle will soon start aerobraking, a maneuver where an orbiting space vehicle dips into the atmosphere to create drag and slow down without burning up its limited supply of fuel. 

It will be the X-37’s first time attempting such a maneuver, according to a Space Force press release, though other spacecraft have performed it in the past. While few people will actually see this feat, one expert said it could inform future spacecraft design as the Space Force pursues the ability to quickly maneuver its assets in orbit.

“Changing orbital planes typically takes quite a bit of fuel,” said Charles Galbreath, senior resident fellow at the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies. “If they can demonstrate a fuel savings through this experiment, through this operation, it could be significant for future operations.”

The 29-foot-long X-37 launches into space aboard a rocket but can re-enter the atmosphere, land on a runway, then launch in orbit again, much like its crewed cousin, the Space Shuttle. The vessel has completed six missions since it first launched in 2010, and its current mission started Dec. 28, 2023, aboard a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket taking off from Kennedy Space Center, Fla.

For this mission, the uncrewed X-37 carries modules to study the effects of radiation on plant seeds provided by NASA. Unlike previous launch vehicles, the larger Falcon Heavy rocket likely put the X-37 in a higher orbit than ever before. 

The higher the orbit, the more pronounced the effect of the Van Allen radiation belts, which NASA describes as two “enormous donuts” of high energy radiation particles trapped around Earth by the planet’s magnetosphere. How the plant seeds respond to that radiation could inform future crewed missions on long space flights, the Space Force said in a November press release.

A SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket launches USSF-52 carrying a United States Space Force X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A. U.S. Space Force photo
A SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket launches USSF-52 carrying a United States Space Force X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A. U.S. Space Force photo

Besides radiation, the X-37 is also supposed to test new space domain awareness technologies used to track objects moving through space. It is not clear whether these tests are related to the aerobraking maneuver. During the maneuver, the Space Force said the X-37 would “safely dispose of its service module components,” which likely refers to the equipment used to carry out the experiments.

There could be several reasons for doing so, Galbreath said. If the tests are complete and the equipment is no longer needed, getting rid of the modules might cut down on mass and make the reentry and recovery process easier and safer. He was also reminded of the Cold War-era CORONA program, where spy satellites in orbit jettisoned film capsules that reentered the atmosphere and drifted from parachutes before being snagged by passing C-130 aircraft.

“We’re well beyond that technology where we’re required to do something like that, but it kind of reminds me of that sort of operation,” Galbreath said. “You can speculate about the deployment of sensors, or the deployment of some sort of reentry vehicle from the X-37 to be recovered.”

No matter what the modules are up to, the aerobraking itself could prove valuable as the Space Force pursues dynamic space operations, where satellites can launch into orbit faster and move around quickly once they get there.

Last year, Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Chance Saltzman described the concept as “almost continuous maneuvering, so that the satellites from any one radar shot looks like it’s maneuvering and it’s just kind of constantly changing its orbit as it goes through—preserving mission but changing its orbit.”

Such maneuvering is not possible with most existing USSF satellites, which only carry enough propellant for “station keeping” and cannot be refueled. At the time, Saltzman said, dynamic operations were only in the “good idea phase.” 

Aerobrake maneuvering may be one brick on the road to leave that phase. The X-37 is currently in a highly elliptical orbit, meaning its path takes the shape of a giant oval with Earth at one end, where the vessel reaches a perigee close to Earth’s atmosphere before swinging back out and high above.

The X-37 “is probably going to change its point of closest approach, its perigee, so that it impacts the atmosphere more than it would have otherwise,” Galbreath explained.

As the atmospheric pressure increases, the X-37 can use its wings to slow down or change its inclination to set out on a different new course, “so there’s a lot of opportunities that you can use the aerodynamics of the upper atmosphere for,” he added. “You can actually change your inclination, a whole new orbital plane, because of the atmospheric pressure.”

X-37B
X-37B orbital test vehicle concludes sixth successful mission. Photo by Staff Sgt. Adam Shanks

With their large solar arrays and non-aerodynamic design, most satellites in orbit today are not built for aerobraking, but the upcoming maneuvers could inform future designs if the Space Force were interested in building a newer cousin of the X-37, Galbreath said.

“It also opens up the possibility of operating vehicles in lower orbits that could use the atmosphere to maneuver on a regular basis while still maintaining enough orbital velocity for the life of its mission,” he added. “So that can create some very interesting opportunities for dynamic space operations that don’t require as much onboard fuel.”

Space Force officials indicated the aerobrake could inform the branch’s future operations.

“This first of a kind maneuver from the X-37B is an incredibly important milestone for the United States Space Force as we seek to expand our aptitude and ability to perform in this challenging domain,” Saltzman said in the Oct. 10 release.

“It’s exciting to see the X-37 team, the Space Force, and the Air Force pushing new boundaries with this test,” Galbreath said. “Hopefully they can talk about the results someday and how that’s going to impact future architectures.”