The F-35 is likely to have more growing pains, and as a result, Congress may slow the program down, according to Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), head of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee. Murtha on Wednesday told defense reporters in Washington, D.C., “I’m for the F-35; I’m for a big buy in the F-35, but I’m not necessarily for buying it this year, if it’s not ready.” He said the F-35 may be heading for a stall-out for technical reasons—he didn’t say what they might be—and if so, Congress may apply the brakes. “We haven’t decided it’s quite as bad” as the F-22’s avionics problems near the end of its development, “but it looks like it’s going in that direction.” He added that, even though the F-35 is a priority for the Administration, “we may not fund it at the level they would like.” Murtha said that the issue of fighter procurement is a “major problem” for Congress to deal with, since money is tight but threats are proliferating. However, he feels that adequate inventories of fighters will help prevent wars.
The Air Force and Boeing agreed to a nearly $2.4 billion contract for a new lot of KC-46 aerial tankers on Nov. 21. The deal, announced by the Pentagon, is for 15 new aircraft in Lot 11 at a cost of $2.389 billion—some $159 million per tail.