Don’t Look for an Airlift Mix Change

Audio of this article is brought to you by the Air & Space Forces Association, honoring and supporting our Airmen, Guardians, and their families. Find out more at afa.org

Air Force Gen. Duncan McNabb, head of US Transportation Command, believes the Pentagon has “the overall mix [of airlift] about right, unless something changes.” When questioned by Senate Armed Services Committee members March 17, McNabb said that the current program of record for 205 C-17s—despite the unprecedented high use rate for those aircraft in Southwest Asia—and the planned modernization of C-5s “satisfies the requirements that I have.” He noted that the Mobility Capability Requirement Study-2016 that goes to Pentagon leadership in May is considering the increase in the number of ground forces begun during the Bush Administration and the higher usage of the C-17, but it seemed clear he does not anticipate a change to the number of C-17s. (The Government Accountability Office last fall questioned whether cutting off C-17 production at 205 might be premature.) Even when Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) noted that the Air Force is “flying the wings off” its C-17s and asked, “Why are you all not asking for more?,” McNabb maintained that the answer lies in the competing options. Those options considered, for instance, “the re-engining of the C-5 vice how much does a new C-17 cost,” and that led to, said McNabb, “the most cost-effective mix that actually meets [the combatant commanders’] needs.” He is banking on the C-5 mod to significantly increase the reliability of the behemoth airlifter, and he believes the KC-X tanker will also add “incomparable” mobility enterprise value in its alter ego role as airlifter. (McNabb written testimony)

Audio of this article is brought to you by the Air & Space Forces Association, honoring and supporting our Airmen, Guardians, and their families. Find out more at afa.org