If used in numbers, the Air Force’s MQ-9 Reaper remotely piloted aircraft would still be a valuable asset in contested airspace against a sophisticated enemy, said Frank Pace, who leads General Atomics Aeronautical Systems’ Aircraft Systems Group. “I don’t think people really understand the effect of low-cost quantities and what you could do with an airplane of this type,” he told the Daily Report in an interview last week at the 50th Paris Air Show in Le Bourget, France. Pace didn’t deny that a single Reaper would be “totally useless” if sent in alone against a sophisticated adversary. “It’s going to get shot down. I agree,” he said during the June 18 interview. However, he said, the story would be different if the Air Force employed a large number of Reapers—Pace used 40 in his narrative—as part of a larger strike package. These Reapers, somewhat stripped down compared to today’s configuration and, as a result, more affordable, could serve as jamming assets, for example, to help disrupt the enemy’s air defenses, he said. “There is confusion you want to create in a war” and “I think the ability to make confusion comes with numbers a little bit,” he said. “If you use [Reapers] to create confusion, then the other airplanes are going to be that much more survivable.”
The Air Force and Boeing agreed to a nearly $2.4 billion contract for a new lot of KC-46 aerial tankers on Nov. 21. The deal, announced by the Pentagon, is for 15 new aircraft in Lot 11 at a cost of $2.389 billion—some $159 million per tail.