In a First, USAF RQ-4 Global Hawk to Operate from UK

In a First, USAF RQ-4 Global Hawk to Operate from UK

An Air Force RQ-4 Global Hawk flew into RAF Fairford on Aug. 22 for a deployment of an undisclosed duration, U.S. Air Forces in Europe announced. The deployment—the first for a Global Hawk to the United Kingdom—will practice aspects of the Agile Combat Employment model, the command said.

The intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance drone “will conduct operations through international and Allied airspace in accordance with international norms and standards,” USAFE said in a release. The Air Force also operates a detachment of U-2 Dragon Lady crewed ISR aircraft from Fairford.

In the U.S., the FAA requires that autonomous aircraft must fly within approved corridors. An Air Force official said the U.K.’s counterpart entity, the Civilian Aviation Authority, established such a corridor for an uncrewed aircraft like the Global Hawk earlier this year. Global Hawk flights from Fairford will likely be timed for nighttime hours to minimize the impact on civilian air traffic in the vicinity, as the aircraft climbs to or descends from its 50,000-foot operating altitude, the official said.

The RQ-4 deployed from Sigonella Naval Air Station on the Italian island of Sicily and followed a circuitous route to Fairford, which took it over Finland, Norway, and Sweden. NATO operates five RQ-4D “Phoenix” aircraft from Sigonella.

The NATO aircraft are equipped with the Multi-Platform Radar Technology Insertion Program (MP-RTIP) and synthetic aperture radar ground surveillance radars. The Air Force’s RQ-4 Block 40, the last variant still in service, also employs the MP-RTIP for ground surveillance. It can also track cruise missiles. The Air Force RQ-4 fleet of nine aircraft—out of an original inventory of 45—is funded to remain in service through fiscal 2027, when the type is slated to retire.

The deployment is also part of USAFE’s efforts “to diversify operating locations and enhance integration with NATO allies,” the command said in a press release.

Agile Combat Employment will come into play as the aircraft is “dispersed from typical operating locations to alternate airfields to enhance survivability,” USAFE said, though it could not immediately be reached to explain how ACE will be practiced with the Global Hawk or how much of a support contingent is needed for the aircraft.

The 501st Combat Support Wing at Fairford has supported other recent deployments, such as a B-52 Bomber Task Force which operated from the base earlier this year.

PHOTOS: B-2 Bombers Fly with Australians, Land on Diego Garcia

PHOTOS: B-2 Bombers Fly with Australians, Land on Diego Garcia

The three B-2 Spirits that touched down in Australia last week for a Bomber Task Force have been making waves across the Indo-Pacific, with show-stopping formation flight and a rare landing at a strategic location.

Two of the B-2s conducted a flight escorted by American F-22s, two Royal Australian Air Force F-35As, two EA-18G Growlers, and one E-7A Wedgetail throughout the airspace of southeastern Australia on Aug 19—an impressive display of airpower between the two allies featuring some of their most advanced fighter, bomber, electronic warfare, and airborne early warning and control aircraft.

Australian KC-30A tankers later joined the flight to refuel the bombers and the Growlers mid-air.

Later in the week, one of the B-2s made a quick pit stop at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, located some 3,000 miles from the mainland. Airmen from the 110th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron changed crews while the ground team quickly refueled the bomber and got it airborne again, all with the engines running—a process known as “hot pitting.”

The team has streamlined this process to ensure more efficiency with fewer personnel.

“In the past, our hot pit crews have been a large group, with a big footprint, going out and setting up,” Col. Matthew Howard, 110th EBS deputy commander and B-2 pilot, said in a release. “With more iterations of this process, we’ve been making it leaner under the Agile Combat Employment concept, where we can land a jet with the minimum number of people, turn the jet, and then get it airborne.”

These bomber missions are designed to enhance readiness “to respond to any potential crisis or challenge in the Indo-Pacific” through joint operations, the release added.

“If we lose a tanker or don’t get a tanker for aerial refueling, a hot pit enables us to move our jet from location to location, refuel and complete the mission,” added Howard.

Diego Garcia hosts a Naval Support Facility and provides access to the Indo-Pacific, Southwest Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. It regularly sees USAF bombers fly in, such as in March when two B-52 Stratofortresses landed there. It has been four years, however, since the Air Force has announced a B-2 landing on the island.

The B-2s are currently deployed to RAAF base Amberley, along with two KC-135R tankers from the Illinois National Guard.

Earlier this month, the Air Force also deployed F-22s from the 27th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron to Australia. The Raptors, along with the RAAF’s F-35s, conducted a joint hot pit refuel mission at the nation’s western base, Curtin. The strategically located base is still undergoing development, as it prepares to host more temporary operations.

“We’re willing to take risks if it means better agility and combat capability,” Master Sgt. Luke Ashman, 27th Expeditionary Fighter Generation Squadron aircraft section chief, said in a release. “The execution of this went very smoothly, the RAAF seems to operate on the same wavelength as us.”

These bomber and fighter operations with Australian forces follow the U.S.-Australian ministerial conference earlier this month, where the two countries’ defense chiefs said they would increase the presence of U.S. aircraft in Australia.

“We’re increasing the presence of rotational U.S. forces in Australia” Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin said at the time, to include “more maritime patrol aircraft and reconnaissance aircraft operating from bases across northern Australia.” He added that the allies are planning on “more frequent rotational bomber deployments.”

Workhorse of the Air: C-130 Celebrates 70 Years Since First Flight

Workhorse of the Air: C-130 Celebrates 70 Years Since First Flight

An era began 70 years ago on Aug. 23 when Lockheed test pilots Stan Beltz and Roy Wimmer, along with flight engineers Jack Real and Dick Stanton, took the new YC-130 prototype on its maiden voyage from Burbank, Calif., to Edwards Air Force Base about 50 miles east. They took off after just 855 feet of runway, “an astoundingly short distance considering most aircraft of that size required 5,000 feet,” Lockheed Martin later wrote.

It was a sign of things to come: in the seven decades since that flight, the C-130 Hercules has delivered troops, equipment, and live-saving supplies to short, unpaved airstrips in the deserts of the Middle East, the jungles of southeast Asia, the snowy wastes of Antarctica and Greenland, and everywhere in between. 

But the Herc’s ability to land and take off in a short distance is just one of the many strengths that makes it one of the longest continually produced aircraft in history, with more than 2,500 airframes operated by 70 countries around the world. 

“The vision that Lockheed Corporation had in providing a versatile, durable, capable aircraft has resulted in the greatest airlift workhorse known to the air forces around the world—especially the U.S. air forces,” Dr. Douglas Kennedy, assistant professor of history at the U.S. Air Force Academy and a former Air Force C-130 pilot himself, told Air & Space Forces Magazine.

“The Four Fans of Freedom remains the steadfast tool for all contingencies,” he added.

Archived photo of the YC-130 during its ferry flight from Burbank, California, to Edwards Air Force Base August 23, 1954. (U.S. Air Force photo)

While the first flight took place in 1954, the C-130’s story began in 1951, when the Air Force requested a medium cargo airplane that could fill the void in between small and large transports, which had trouble landing on the short runways where troops were fighting during the Korean War.

“It was designed to be used in a tactical situation where there weren’t any nice, clean places to take care of it,” Lockheed engineer Willis Hawkins told the Smithsonian’s Air & Space Magazine in 2004. 

The Air Force got what it asked for: a strong durable airframe, a giant tail that stabilizes the aircraft at slow speeds, propellers mounted high to keep the engines clear of dust and dirt, a narrow undercarriage flanked by sturdy tires to operate on and off roads, a tall, fully pressurized cargo compartment set low to the ground to allow for a wide range of cargo, and a built-in auxiliary power unit that lets the aircraft start up “when the nearest ground power cart is 150 miles away,” HistoryNet wrote in 2017. 

All this, and the C-130 was surprisingly maneuverable: there was even a four-ship C-130 aerial demonstration team called the Four Horsemen in the late 1950s. 

The Hercules proved its worth in the Vietnam War, where it delivered hundreds of paratroopers during Operation Junction City in 1967; landed or air-dropped off much of the supplies for the besieged Marines at Khe Sanh in 1968; and picked up new roles as aerial refueling tankers for rescue helicopters, land-anywhere taxis for special operations troops, and side-firing gunships for close air support.

An HH-3 “Jolly Green Giant” refuels from an HC-130P tanker. The ability to refuel helicopters in flight greatly enhanced search and rescue operations in Southeast Asia by giving helicopters greater range. (U.S. Air Force photo)

The Hercules truly lived up to its namesake during the fall of Saigon where, on April 29, 1975, a single C-130 flown by South Vietnamese Air Force pilot carried 452 refugees to Thailand, 32 of them in the cockpit alone.

“The aircraft was overloaded by at least 10,000 pounds and required every foot of runway to become airborne, including hitting the brakes while taxiing in order to close the rear ramp doors,” the U.S. Air Force wrote about the flight.

Do Anything, Anywhere

The C-130’s flexibility is one of its defining features. From 1960 to 1986, Air Force C-130 crews snagged capsules filled with spy satellite film as they dangled from parachutes over the Pacific Ocean. During Desert Shield and Desert Storm, EC-130 Command Solos broadcast radio programs meant to convince Iraqi troops to surrender, while Compass Call variants could disrupt enemy communications, jam radar, and help suppress enemy air defenses. In 1963, a C-130 became the largest, heaviest airplane to ever land and take off from an aircraft carrier. 

It seems the Herc can’t stop taking on new jobs: in 2021, a C-130 acted as a drone carrier by snatching an unmanned aircraft out of the air. A year later, an MC-130J Commando II performed the first live-fire of a pallet-dropped cruise missile. 

But the C-130’s peacetime portfolio is even more expansive. The Herc has dropped hay to stranded cattle in Colorado. Every summer, Air Force C-130 crews perform some of the most dangerous flying outside of combat when they drop fire retardant to stop wildfires across the western U.S. Meanwhile, the Ohio-based 910th Airlift Wing is equipped with large-area aerial spray units that kill the mosquitoes and filth flies that hatch in the standing flood water left over by large hurricanes. 

Since 1965, C-130s have also served as the aircraft of choice for the “Hurricane Hunters” of the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron, who fly into storms and atmospheric rivers to collect data for scientists and emergency officials back home.

A U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) worker waits for a flight on a C-130J Hercules assigned to the 75th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron, Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa, in Maputo, Mozambique, March 29, 2019. (U.S. Air Force Photo by Tech. Sgt. Chris Hibben)

Outside of those technical roles, the Herc has saved thousands of lives just by dropping off food and medical supplies nearly anywhere on Earth, including southern Sudan during the Darfur Conflict, where the aircraft played a pivotal role with the United Nations World Food Program.

“We fly 10 hours a day, first light to last light,” Jaco Klopper, former chief of air operations for the WFP in southern Sudan, told the Smithsonian in 2004. “We refuel the airplane as it’s being reloaded. Turnaround time is about 15 to 20 minutes. If it wasn’t for the C-130s, a large number of people would have died.”

Always Improving

Part of what allows the C-130 to keep taking on new roles is that the aircraft itself is constantly changing. The analog, smooth-nosed YC-130 took off with just three blades on its propellers and engines that were more like blow-dryers compared to those of today’s C-130Js, which also feature six-bladed propellors and a glass cockpit.

“Internally, little remains of the airplane’s 1950s heritage,” the Smithsonian wrote. “But two things never changed: Riding in the cargo hold of a C-130 is still a class below steerage, and, from the first A model to today’s spanking new J, from the first hour of flight to the 20 millionth, the airplane has been fun to fly.”

Kennedy shared that opinion of the aircraft.

“I was always proud to maneuver the beautiful beast around the Americas, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, landing in the Moroccan desert, a former-World War II open field in southern England, and the limestone short runways in southern Colombia, or dropping the most lethal forces known in mankind,” he said. “Cheers to seven decades of service to the workhorse of the air.”

Kennedy’s fellow Herc driver, Gen. Mike Minihan, the outgoing head of Air Mobility Command, called it “the greatest airplane ever built.” Still, Minihan told Air & Space Forces Magazine, it would be nothing without the people who fly, fix, and support it.

“It is blue-collar work. There is nothing majestic or outwardly appealing to it until you’ve been a part of that family,” he explained, holding back tears. “Then it is the most majestic and appealing thing in the world. That airplane has an ability to bring the best out of America and Americans.”

The general said he was heartbroken that his days flying the C-130 are over, but he was ecstatic for an airplane “that’s been made brand new for 70 years and will continue to be made in the foreseeable future.

“I’m happy that we not only get to celebrate that airframe, but more importantly, I’m happy that we get to celebrate the people that fly, fix and support it.”

c-130
A C-130 Hercules with the 36th Airlift Squadron takes off at Yokota Air Base, Japan, during a routine sortie Oct. 2, 2015. ((U.S. Air Force photo by Osakabe Yasuo)
After Refueling Mishap, KC-46 Drops ‘Portion’ of Its Boom

After Refueling Mishap, KC-46 Drops ‘Portion’ of Its Boom

A KC-46A tanker from McConnell Air Force Base, Kan., suffered a mishap while refueling an F-15 Eagle on Aug. 21, prompting the crews on the Pegasus to declare an in-flight emergency for its boom, according to multiple statements released by units involved.

No one was injured during the incident, but the 931st Air Refueling Wing that operated the KC-46 did say in a release that the aircraft landed with its boom down at Travis Air Force Base, Calif., and dropped a “portion” of the boom nearby the base.

Unconfirmed photos claiming to show the KC-46 after it landed circulated on the unofficial “Air Force amn/nco/snco” Facebook page—in the photos, the boom appears to have broken in half, with exposed wires and pipes, and the exhaust cone of the tanker is badly damaged.

The 931st Air Refueling Wing could not confirm the pictures’ veracity.

An investigation is underway to find out the cause of the mishap and details of the damage to both the KC-46 and the F-15, the wing’s statement added. The wing wasn’t immediately available to provide further information on which unit the fighter belongs to or where it landed following the incident.

The Travis runway temporarily closed to allow personnel to respond to the aircraft and ensure the crew’s safety but has since resumed normal operations, the 60th Air Mobility Wing said in a separate statement.

“Our Airmen are not only primed to respond at a moment’s notice, they are also capable of navigating and preventing further danger during an emergency,” Col. Cynthia Welch, 931st Air Refueling Wing commander, said in the statement. “The KC-46 continues to provide our Team McConnell aircrews with precise opportunities for air refueling, cargo and aeromedical supporting are partners here and worldwide.”

While the cause of the mishap remains unclear, the tanker aircraft has been plagued by problems with its refueling system and suffered multiple refueling accidents over the years. This latest incident is the second mishap within two months involving the McConnell AFB; in June, one of its tankers was damaged while refueling a USAF F-16 in Dutch airspace. Audio from the aircraft described a refueling door damage on the fighter due to a “too close breakaway incident” between the two aircraft. An Airman aboard KC-46 then reported the tanker was also “damaged and unable to refuel.” The cause of the mishap is still under investigation.

Another midair refueling incident in 2022 left a Pegasus heavily damaged after it attempted to gas up an F-15. Unconfirmed photos posted on social media website following the accident showed a wrecked boom of the plane below its dented tail cone.

The Air Force and Boeing are currently working to resolve multiple Category I deficiencies to the KC-46’s refueling system, including a “stiff” boom and a faulty Remote Vision System (RVS), a setup of cameras and monitors the boom operator uses to connect the tanker to the refueling aircraft. The system washes out or blacks out in certain conditions, such as in direct sunlight. The RVS system can also cause issues with boom operator’s depth perception, which creates the risk of the boom operator accidentally hitting the aircraft the KC-46 is refueling.

Fixes for both the stiff boom and the Remote Vision System are still months, if not years, away. In the meantime, Travis is making the transition from the KC-10 to the KC-46—becoming the last base to say goodbye to the Extender.

Air Force Opens the Door to Competition for New Ejection Seat

Air Force Opens the Door to Competition for New Ejection Seat

The Air Force has cracked the door open to a competition for its Next-Generation Ejection Seat, four years after awarding a sole-source contract for the program. 

In a “sources sought synopsis” released Aug. 16, the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center announced it wants to “gather additional information on the current state and availability of vendors which can provide an ejection seat that meets Air Force safety and sustainment requirements” for the F-15, F-16, F-22, and B-1. 

All four aircraft currently fly with the ACES II ejection seat, built by Collins Aerospace. 

The Air Force announcement does not promise a future competition. But it does mark a notable change from October 2019, when the service its sole-source contract award to Collins for the new ACES 5 ejection seat, declaring it was the “only company able to meet the Government’s minimum requirements for the NGES program.” 

Collins agreed to a $700 million deal in October 2020, covering ejection seats for all four fighters, plus the A-10. Collins, now a subsidiary of RTX, declined to comment on the Air Force’s search for options. The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center could not immediately offer a comment. 

The need for a new ejection seat is driven by several factors, said Kevin Coyne, founder of “The Ejection Site” and a member of the SAFE Association, an organization focused on safety and life support systems. 

ACES II was first developed in the 1970s, Coyne said, and while upgrades and modifications have been incorporated since then, new technology has developed that can reduce injuries and help pilots and aircrew survive the hazards of being hurled from their aircraft in flight—events that can cause all sorts of traumatic injuries. Coyne said maintenance on ACES II seats can be difficult, requiring the removal of the aircraft canopy and extra equipment. 

U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Ryan Banke, 20th Component Maintenance Squadron egress technician, installs an ejection seat and canopy on an F-16 at Shaw Air Force Base, S.C., in March 2022. U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Madeline Herzog

New seats like Collins’s ACES 5 and Martin-Baker’s US18E accommodate both lighter and heavier occupants, and have systems to protect crew members’ heads, necks, arms, and legs. Their designs reduce the need to remove canopies during maintenance. 

The Air Force has been eyeing an ACES II replacement for nearly a decade now. The service released a similar “sources sought synopsis” in 2016 for the NGES program and it updated its escape system safety criteria later that year, following up with another “sources sought” synopsis in 2019

The latest sources sought document has similar requirements for pilot weight, performance at “level flight conditions,” and probability of major injury. But it raises the minimum altitude required for low-level escapes when a fighter aircraft is rolling, pitching, or sinking. That eases the requirement for the manufacturer.

The Air Force received two responses to its 2019 synopsis, before determining that only Collins Aerospace was able to meet its requirements. Martin-Baker is the only other manufacturer to make an ejection seat for an Air Force plane—its seats are on the F-35, the T-6, and T-38. Its US18E seat has also been picked to go on the Block 70 F-16 fighters currently being built for foreign partners. 

Martin-Baker did not immediately respond to a query. 

A Martin-Baker US18E ejection seat is tested for the F-16. Image courtesy of Martin-Baker

Collins’s ACES 5 ejection has already been selected for the new T-7A Red Hawk trainer, and the requirements resulted in a delay during testing. Air Force officials said that tests showed the escape system exhibited unsafe deceleration at parachute opening, potentially causing pilots to suffer concussions as their visors tore off. At the time, industry sources told Air & Space Forces Magazine that USAF’s crash dummies were improperly instrumented, raising questions about the results. A reassessment of the data showed the seats were compliant, the sources said. 

ACES II also faced scrutiny in 2021 when an F-16 pilot’s ejection seat failed to fire during an emergency landing, leading to his death. A subsequent report faulted the seat’s Digital Recovery Sequencer, a component that was being replaced fleet wide at the time of the accident. 

Since then, however, several aviators have successfully ejected from aircraft with ACES II seats. An American F-16 pilot ejected over South Korea in May 2023, the 703rd air crew member to safely eject with the seat, Collins Aerospace asserted at the time. In January 2024, all four crew members on a B-1 bomber safely ejected at Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D., during an emergency landing. 

Martin-Baker seats have also had troubles. In July 2022, the Air Force temporarily grounded its F-35s when defective cartridges were found in the ejection seats. And in May, an instructor pilot died in a T-6 trainer when his ejection seat went off while the plane was on the ground. 

First Batch Of Space Force Guardians Finish Honor Guard Training

First Batch Of Space Force Guardians Finish Honor Guard Training

The Space Force welcomed its first group of homegrown Guardians to complete Honor Guard training at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, Washington, D.C. earlier this month.

Prior to Aug. 16, the Space Force Honor Guard was made up of prior Airmen who had transferred to the Space Force. But the graduation last week included six Guardians, five men and one woman, who came to Anacostia-Bolling right after completing basic military training.

“This is a special day for the Air Force and Space Force, Air Force Col. Ryan A.F. Crowley, commander of JBAB and the 11th Wing, said in an Aug. 21 press release. “These ceremonial guardsmen represent what all our Airmen and Guardians are doing all around the world, past, present and future.”

Honor Guards are the premier ceremonial units representing military branches at funeral services at Arlington National Cemetery and at public events elsewhere. The Space Force Honor Guard is a separate flight within the Air Force Honor Guard command, which has more than 200 guardsmen and support workers assigned to it. 

Honor Guardsmen bear caskets of deceased service members and their dependents to Arlington, present flags at events, fire volleys at funeral services, and perform rifle drill routines. The Air Force Honor Guard even has its own barber shop available for ceremonial guardsmen six days a week to maintain a constant professional image, according to the unit’s website.

U.S. Space Force Sgt. Sergkei Triantafyllidis, a technical training instructor with the United States Air Force Honor Guard, looks on as Honor Guard trainees of Class 24D work on their drill movements on Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, Washington, D.C., July 22, 2024. (U.S. Air Force photo by Robert W. Mitchell)

Training to become an Honor Guard takes nine weeks: the six Guardians that graduated along with 12 Airmen started June 17 and were recruited straight out of basic training, putting their original career plans on hold to volunteer for the job, explained Senior Master Sgt. Matthew P. Massoth, senior enlisted leader of the Space Force Honor Guard

“They were planning to become a cyber Guardian, a space or intel specialist Guardian,” he said in the press release. “Six of them volunteered to put a pause on that and come out to the Honor Guard for two years.”

Being the first in history was part of the appeal for some of them. Besides marking the first group of Guardians to complete the course, last week’s graduation was also the first Air Force Honor Guard training class to combine two military branches, according to the press release. 

Today there are only slight uniform differences between the Air Force and Space Force: for example, Air Force ceremonial guardsmen wear a winged star—called a Hap Arnold device—on their uniform, while Space Force ceremonial guardsmen wear a Delta symbol. There will be more differences as the Space Force rolls out its service dress uniform, but for the most part the training is the same, explained Space Force Sgt. Sergkei Triantafyllidis, a technical instructor with the Air Force Honor Guard.

“Our primary mission is the same, and that is to perform funerals at Arlington National Cemetery, so in this regard the course is exactly the same,” he said.

That training, which emphasizes attention to detail and time management, should serve the graduates well throughout their careers after their 12-24 month stint in the Honor Guard is up, Massoth pointed out.

“They will take all of those skills along with their maturity acquired over their two years in the military and, we predict, that they when they get to their tech schools it will be much easier because they have already adapted to the military way of life,” he said.

The graduation came about a year after the Space Force first stood up its Ceremonial Honor Guard program when its first 16 members transferred to the service. Now the program stands at 33 members, with another 10 Guardians expected to start technical Honor Guard training this month, Massoth said. 

Members of the United States Air Force Honor Guard conduct training at the Air Force Memorial in Washington D.C., July 26, 2016 ((US Air National Guard photo by Staff Sergeant Christopher S. Muncy)
Allvin: ‘Built to Adapt’ Is the New Model for Air Force Programs

Allvin: ‘Built to Adapt’ Is the New Model for Air Force Programs

The Air Force has committed to major programs over the past several years: the B-21 Raider stealth bomber, the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile, and the Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) fighter and associated Collaborative Combat Aircraft

Sentinel has run massively over its initial cost projection. CCA—autonomous, loyal wingman drones—seems to be on track. But while the budgetary profiles of the two programs stand in stark contrast, they each have a concept of modularity built in; they are intended to be relatively easy to upgrade, Air Force officials say.

Now, the Air Force wants to push that concept of adaptability even further.

During a recent wide-ranging interview with Air & Space Forces Magazine, Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David W. Allvin explained his view of how the Air Force should think about new programs in the future.

“Think systems over platforms,” Allvin said during an Aug. 14 interview. “That’s the environment we’re adapting to. So a systems-first approach, against which platforms who do things can maybe come and go. So that way, maybe those platforms can solve for agility and pop that one out, put another one in, and you’ve better enabled.”

Allvin’s watchword in his first year as Chief has been “agility,” arguing that the technological change is rapid, the character of war is changing, and the service needs to keep pace.

In July, Allvin floated the idea of “built to adapt” over “built to last,” underscoring the importance of not being committed to a single design for decades. That did not refer to any specific program, but rather to the concept of developing manned and unmanned platforms that are built to rapidly and quickly adopt new technology.

It is an approach he expanded on during an Aug. 21 media roundtable.

“I’m not saying it is ubiquitous across everything, but as a general proposition, it is a methodology that allows you to adapt to technology faster,” Allvin said. “If one is going to build something that is going to be crewed—with however many crew members in it—if you build in the modularity toward it, it continues to have the ability to ingest new technology and stay as part of the overall system, ‘Giddy up. We’ll keep that.’”

Allvin said he would not completely rule out a future low-cost crewed fighter—a notional image of one appeared during one of his recent presentations—in keeping with his overall philosophy of being open to new technology. He has previously said the Air Force is committed to buying at least 100 B-21s but will not foreclose a change in long-term plans if technological progress leads to something more capable.

“Whatever platform you’re going to build, it’s got to integrate,” Allvin said in his Aug. 14 interview. “That way, when the system gets upgraded, it’s at the speed of software, and everything gets upgraded with it because you’ve built the platform to build into the system rather than building platform-unique things. … Why? The pace of change. That’s the environment we’re adapting to.”

Allvin has previously said that the service learned lessons from Collaborative Combat Aircraft about adapting to new technology that could be used for anything, not just iterations of new drones.

“It’s not just the attritable or expendable” systems that can benefit the Air Force as technology changes, Allvin said Aug. 21. “I’m happy if it’s built to last if it adapts to what the technology does … and helps you employ new technology faster. That becomes the coin of the realm for all the platforms, whether they last for five years or 50.”

F-16 Ground Emergency Sends 13 Airmen at Luke for Brief Hospital Visit

F-16 Ground Emergency Sends 13 Airmen at Luke for Brief Hospital Visit

Thirteen Airmen at Luke Air Force Base, Ariz., made a brief visit to a nearby hospital on Aug. 20 amid concerns that the emergency power unit of the F-16 fighter jet they were working on had accidentally activated.

According to a base release, the emergency power unit (EPU) did not activate, and all 13 Airmen were evaluated and released.

Had the EPU activated, it would have been serious cause for concern—the F-16 unit is powered by hydrazine, a “corrosive, toxic, and highly flammable” chemical compound that is also highly carcinogenic, according to the Department of Defense and the Air Force.

Airmen were conducting routine maintenance checks on an F-16 at about 4:40 p.m. when they declared a ground emergency over concerns that the jet’s EPU was activated, according to a base release.

The EPU provides emergency power for F-16 flight controls so pilots can land the aircraft safely if the jet’s other systems fail midflight. The EPU and the hydrazine fuel tank are located aft of the cockpit, so pilots are relatively isolated from the system, but ground maintenance requires extensive safety measures.

“If you touch it, it absorbs very quickly and it’s very cancerous,” Staff Sgt. Christopher Glover of the 49th Component Maintenance Squadron at Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., said in a 2023 press release. “That’s why we wear our protective gear such as gloves, boots, a full suit, FireHawk mask, and air bottle.”

Air Force aircraft fuel systems journeymen assigned to the 378th Expeditionary Maintenance Squadron, signal mission completion in front of an F-16CJ Fighting Falcon, assigned to the 79th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron, after a hydrazine response training at Prince Sultan Air Base, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Aug. 25, 2022. (U.S. Air Force photo Staff Sgt. Noah J. Tancer)

Emergency teams determined there was no activation of the EPU at Luke, but 10 Airmen were taken to a local hospital as a precaution, the base explained. The ground emergency ended at about 5:22 p.m. after responders determined no hydrazine had been released, despite social media speculation to the contrary.

But just four hours later, at about 9:45 p.m., base personnel declared a second ground emergency, concerned again that the EPU for the same F-16 may have activated. This time three Airmen were taken to a local hospital out of an abundance of caution. They were also evaluated and released. The response team again determined there was no release of hydrazine and the emergency ended at about 10:30 p.m.

“The aircraft will not return to service until further testing has been conducted,” the base said in its statement.

A training base, Luke is where thousands of Air Force pilots first learn to fly the F-16 and F-35 fighter jets. The 56th Operations Group, which runs the fighter training mission, is the largest fighter group in the Air Force, according to the base website.

An infographic shows the emergency power unit systems in an F-16 fighter jet. (Image via Strategic Enviromental Research and Development Program / Environmental Security Technology Certification Program)
US and South Korean Fighters Will Fly 2,000 Sorties in Five Days for Latest Exercise

US and South Korean Fighters Will Fly 2,000 Sorties in Five Days for Latest Exercise

U.S. and South Korean fighters are flying sorties at a breakneck pace this week in their Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise meant to prepare for potential missile attacks by North Korea.

Over 200 aircraft, including F-16s and A-10s from the 8th Fighter Wing and 51st Fighter Wing and F-15K, FA-50, and KF-16 jets from the Republic of Korea Air Force, are conducting 2,000 sorties together from Aug. 19 to Aug. 23, according to the ROKAF.

In a release, the South Koreans said flight operations would continue nonstop for five consecutive days, generating the “largest” number of sorties in a joint U.S.-ROK exercise. It will also mark the first time multiple squadrons from both countries are engaging in nonstop operations.

“Conducting exercises of this scale and nature is a necessary part of our readiness posture here in the Republic of Korea,” U.S. Air Force Col. William McKibban, 51st Fighter Wing commander, said in a release.

A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon aircraft, assigned to the 80th Fighter Squadron, taxis after landing at Kunsan Air Base, Republic of Korea, Aug. 19, 2024. U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Nicholas Ross

The 51st Fighter Wing release noted that the U.S. fighters will carry out local flights and combat drills to improve teamwork with the ROK Air Force in “realistic combat scenarios,” designed to counter weapons of mass destruction.

“We must continue to improve, innovate and optimize our processes to generate lethal combat power,” Col. Peter Kasarskis, 8th Fighter Wing commander, said in a statement. “Our participation in these exercises builds a more combat-ready force, better able to meet any challenge in the Indo-Pacific region.”

Both USAF units are assessing their readiness by deploying the fighters to a partner base on the peninsula, to quickly adapt and perform in a new environment. Such drills demonstrate that the wing is “ready to fight tonight when needed, from the tactical level all the way up to the operational,” added McKibban.

Both the scale of the exercise and the focus on Agile Combat Employment mirror the U.S. Air Force’s growing emphasis on large-scale exercises in the Indo-Pacific.

As a whole, Ulchi Freedom Shield which spans 11 days across land, air, and sea. This year’s iteration features over 19,000 troops from the two allies and various United Nations Command member states. The training will include rehearsal scenarios aimed for potential attacks from Pyongyang.

“Exercise USF will reflect realistic threats across all domains, such as the DPRK’s missile threats,” Ryan Donald, spokesperson for the U.S. Forces Korea said in a press conference. “We’ll take lessons learned from recent armed conflicts. This is all designed, so we don’t have a failure of imagination.”

The South Korean Defense Ministry has also stated that the exercise will include “responses to North Korean nuclear threats.”

Just hours before the training kicked off on Aug. 19, North Korea’s Foreign Ministry labeled it as “the most aggressive and provocative invasion rehearsal in the world” in its state-run newspaper. The Pentagon has dismissed the claim.

“These exercises are defensive in nature,” Pentagon Press Secretary Air Force Maj. Gen. Patick Ryder said on Aug 20. “They’re also longstanding, and these are opportunities for our forces to work together on interoperability and to learn how to operate in dissimilar environments.”

Additionally, the U.S. military will support “the ROK government’s wartime preparation for defensive operations, offensive operations, stability operations and defense support to civil authorities,” Donald said.

During the exercise, the two nations will conduct live-fire exercises and comprehensive field drills to enhance interoperability. The exercise will also incorporate space-related elements, such as “GPS jamming and cyber attacks,” according to Donald.

Last year’s iteration saw a B-1 bomber joined by both nations’ fighters for training before the exercise concluded, but whether any U.S. strategic assets will be featured in this year’s edition remains murky.

“With regards to strategic assets, it’s premature (to discuss), and also a violation of policy to disclose that information at this time,” said Donald.