Air Force Tells Congress: Better to Demolish Vacant Buildings than Maintain Them

Air Force Tells Congress: Better to Demolish Vacant Buildings than Maintain Them

The Air Force’s top enlisted member told lawmakers last week that the service must demolish hundreds of unneeded buildings, a move that would pay a “10-to-1 return on investment,” particularly for improving quality of life for service members, rather than spending money on their upkeep.

In the past 30 years, the Air Force has eliminated 60 percent of its fighter squadrons and 40 percent of its end-strength, but only 15 percent of its installations, Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force David Flosi told members of a House Appropriations subcommittee at an April 8 hearing on military quality of life.

“Today, 30 percent of our infrastructure is in excess to need,” Flosi said. “I’ve learned no matter how much we work to improve quality of life, we will not get the desired effect as an Air Force If we don’t focus on excess infrastructure.

“It all requires funding and manpower to maintain but provides no benefit to the mission, our airmen, or our nation. Divesting, consolidating, and/or reallocating this infrastructure will free up funding to improve quality of life and the quality of our service.”

Flosi’s remarks further Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin’s argument from last month’s AFA Warfare Symposium: the Air Force has “too much infrastructure” and needs to consolidate to free up funds for more important things.

Notably, neither Allvin or Flosi mentioned Base Realignment and Closure, or BRAC, which has traditionally been an unpopular subject among lawmakers reluctant to lose jobs in their districts.. Instead Flosi’s recommendation to dismantle old infrastructure seemed to gain some traction among subcommittee members, who also tied it to quality of life concerns.

Chairman Rep. John Carter (R-Texas) said he liked the idea of “looking at things that we can demolish, so we don’t have to take care of them.”

Carter asked the enlisted chiefs from each service at the hearing if there are any policy changes that would help them “alleviate capacity shortages” outlined in a 2023 Government Accountability Office report that detailed barracks with unacceptable health, safety, and privacy concerns. 

Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps Carlos Ruiz told Carter the recommendations in the GAO report prompted Commandant Gen. Eric Smith to launch a “very focused approach to human beings and getting after the infrastructure.

“We do need help with, as Chief Flosi stated, the amount of buildings that I need to knock down. It’s an expensive [thing] there to do, sometimes more expensive than building anew.”

The Air Force plans to invest more than $1 billion over the next five years to cover sustainment, restoration, and modernization of the service’s dormitories, Flosi said, adding that “we do not have any of our dorms in failing condition today across the Air Force.”

Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force David Flosi testifies during the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Oversight hearing – Quality of Life in the Military on Capital Hill, Washington D.C., April 8, 2025. U.S. Navy photo by Senior Chief Mass Communication Specialist Anastasia McCarroll

“What we’re trying to do, much like my Marine counterpart here, is we’re trying to balance excess infrastructure and locations where we have excess infrastructure that we need to get rid of,” Flosi added.

“We’ve done the analysis and, while it is expensive to demolish, we know it’s about a 10-to-1 return on investment. So over time, it’s a really good use of taxpayer dollars to get rid of excess infrastructure and consolidate and focus our resources on the infrastructure we really need to take care of our Airmen.”

Speaking in support of the plan, Rep. Stephanie Bice (R-Okla.) highlighted that the Air Force alone has about 1,200 buildings that are currently vacant, and that the entire demolition budget for all the services combined is just $75 million.

Bice added that continuing to maintain these unneeded buildings is taking resources away from military branches that could be better spent on other priorities.

“And so I want to encourage our folks that, when we’re looking at our appropriations package, to potentially increase that so that we can raze some of these buildings, take the workload off of your plates and allow us to continue to really focus on the mission at hand,” Bice said.

Paparo: Airlift and Tanker Fleets ‘Below What We Need’ in Pacific

Paparo: Airlift and Tanker Fleets ‘Below What We Need’ in Pacific

The Air Force and Navy’s logistics capabilities—including airlift and aerial tanking—are insufficient for the needs of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, its commander told lawmakers last week, and the requirement needs to be addressed by more than just commercial stopgaps. He also endorsed the idea of small, uncrewed sustainment craft, as they could permit support to smaller and more dispersed units.

“We have … significant gaps in sealift,” Adm. Samuel J. Paparo told the Senate Armed Services Committee in an April 10 hearing, adding that the Combat Logistics Force—which includes both sealift and airlift—“in total is about 60 percent of the actual requirement.”

INDOPACOM makes up for that in part by hiring commercial tankers and “contracting other capabilities,” he said, but “when the unforgiving hour comes” and battle is engaged, only military ships and aircraft will be able to go forward into combat zones, he noted.

Moreover, “as I utter these words, 17 of those Combat Logistics Force ships are laid up for lack of manpower,” Paparo noted.

In addition, Paparo said, “we have to have many millions of pounds of jet fuel in the air for every capability. And so our tanker fleet is below what we need. We account for that with some contract air services as well.” U.S. fighter jets refueled off a commercial tanker in late 2023 over the Indo-Pacific, and Air Mobility Command has said it is working on an analysis into expanding the concept.

Still, Paparo noted the same issue: should conflict arise, the U.S. military will need its own aircraft to send into war zones.

To highlight the massive burden on airlift, Paparo said that moving a single Patriot air defense battalion from INDOPACOM to the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility “took 73 C-17 loads” to accomplish.

“That’s [just] one battalion of a force element,” he emphasized. “So our lift requirements must be paid attention to.”

On social media, former AMC commander Gen. Mike Minihan echoed Paparo’s point: “If [73] tails are required for a limited move like that, we are woefully unprepared for what large-scale operations against a peer adversary will demand,” he wrote.

To get after these shortages, Paparo said that “diversifying the tanker fleet is key,” as are “alternatives of lift capability that we can order into harm’s way.”

Asked by Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) if he sees a role for uncrewed commercial airlift “in a contested logistics environment,” Paparo said it would open the door to new tactics.

“One of the precepts of unmanned is, never send a human being to do something that a machine can do,” Paparo said. “So … inherently, we’re moving in that direction, and I’d welcome the ability to execute that lift.”

He also said such a capability would “give me the ability to diversify the places” that sustainment can go directly, “bringing smaller payloads into simultaneously smaller maneuvering units, and would enhance our ability to sustain by the speed it would confer.”

Paparo also said the command is doing everything it can to smartly manage the logistics support, materiel, and pre-positioning of items it has.

“Over the top of all of this, we’re incorporating artificial intelligence tools with command and control tools, so that it’s not an on-demand system, but so that we are executing that absolutely indispensable joint function as effectively as we possibly can,” Paparo said.

“We are an AI-enabled headquarters, and that’s important too, but you can’t AI your way out of a materiel shortage.”

Tournear Reinstated as SDA Director After Investigation

Tournear Reinstated as SDA Director After Investigation

Derek M. Tournear, the director of the trailblazing Space Development Agency, who was put on administrative leave in January amid an investigation into a disputed contract, will return to his duties April 17, the Department of the Air Force announced. 

Tournear’s return is seen as a major boost for SDA, the future of which has been in question in recent months.  

A Department of the Air Force spokesperson told Air & Space Forces Magazine that investigation into Tournear has been completed, and “the matter was addressed through established civilian personnel processes.” 

Breaking Defense first reported Tournear’s reinstatement.

Tournear was named the first permanent director of the agency in 2019, and pioneered its ground-breaking approach to military space acquisition, awarding contracts for hundreds of small satellites to go in low Earth orbit in two-year cycles. SDA has earned plaudits for the work, and Tournear is seen by many as a transformational visionary. 

Yet the small agency—which originally began as an independent organization reporting directly to the undersecretary of defense for research and engineering, and eventually transferred into the Space Force—has also clashed at times with traditional acquisition insiders and some prime contractors. 

In October 2023, for example, Tournear took to social media to claim he had faced internal resistance to SDA and pledged to be the “bad cop” as he pushed for change in Pentagon acquisition processes. 

That tension peaked in January, when Tournear was abruptly put on leave with little explanation. Subsequent court filings revealed the suspension was tied to a contract protest by Viasat, which alleged Tournear had violated federal acquisition regulations by providing a competitor, Tyvak, additional information on the bidding process. 

While Tournear was suspended, SDA was temporarily led by Lt. Gen. Philip A. Garrant, head of Space Systems Command, then by William Blauser, deputy director of the Department of the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office. 

By February, SDA agreed to a corrective action plan, including canceling Tyvak’s contract and reopening the competition for 10 satellites with a new source selection official, according to court documents. In March, the agency reissued its solicitation. 

Tournear is now set to return as SDA moves forward. While he was on leave, the agency issued multiple solicitations and requests for information, including a call for studies on President Donald Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” missile defense initiative, and a request for proposals for Tranche 3 for the missile tracking layer of its constellation. SDA is likely to be a major player in Golden Dome, thanks to its previous work on missile warning and tracking. 

At the same time, a recent Pentagon memo called for an “independent review” to determine the “health” of SDA and consider whether it should remain a semi-independent acquisition arm or be absorbed into other Space Force offices. In late February, the Government Accountability Office reported its view that SDA could be investing too heavily in satellite-to-satellite laser communications before proving the technology works. SDA officials have disputed some of the GAO findings, but say they’ll address the watchdog’s concerns and prove that their laser communication concept is viable. 

The agency is also targeting launches for its Tranche 1 satellites in late summer, after months of delays. Getting those spacecraft to orbit will be key for SDA to counter critics and start operationalizing its satellite constellation. 

Space Force, Intelligence Community Say They’re Breaking Through on Data Sharing

Space Force, Intelligence Community Say They’re Breaking Through on Data Sharing

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo.—After months of debate and sometimes public tension, the Space Force and Intelligence Community are making progress on establishing ways to work together, officials said this week—with one predicting there will soon be “a sharing of data like we’ve never seen before.” 

At the Space Symposium on April 8, Vice Chief of Space Operations Gen. Michael A. Guetlein and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Director Vice Adm. Frank D. Whitworth appeared on panel together touting their successes and addressing common concerns. 

Since the stand-up of the Space Force and its inclusion in the Intelligence Community, there have been questions about its relationship with the likes of the National Reconnaissance Office and NGA.  

For years, the NRO has used satellites to collect imagery and signals intelligence, and the NGA has analyzed that data to produce intelligence products. Now the Space Force is doing more and more intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance from orbit, with the goal of delivering tactical and operational intel to warfighters. 

Space Force proponents have argued the NRO and NGA are focused on high-level strategic missions and can’t provide intelligence data quick enough to the battlefield. IC proponents say the agencies have decades of experience performing their missions and serve a critical function by making sense of the vast amounts of data coming from space. 

During the panel, Guetlein emphasized that the Space Force doesn’t want to duplicate existing NGA efforts, whether that’s buying commercial analytics or organic analysis. 

“I would much rather go copy what they’ve already done and build upon that in a collaborative manner than have to go recreate all that technical capability from scratch,” he said. 

For his part, Whitworth said the NGA is working on accreditation for models to alert combatant commanders and provide them with verified, reliable intel on faster timelines, and he asked for patience as they do so. 

“The reason that we do this is not to centralize. It is actually to decentralize,” he said. “And so when I ask for this patience, please remember that we’re trying to establish that standard so that you can move quickly, ensuring that prerogative of the Commander-in-Chief and of the SecDef and of those combatant commands is preserved all the while. It will help speed.” 

One of the biggest sticking points in the Space Force’s relationship with the NRO and NGA has been who should be the one buying ISR imagery and services from commercial space companies. 

While the NRO has bought commercial imagery and the NGA has bought commercial analytics for years, the Space Force is getting in on the game too, largely through the Commercial Space Office and its Tactical Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Tracking program, or TacSRT. 

Guardian leaders have praised the TacSRT program as a major success. It acts as a marketplace for operators to essentially buy surveillance-as-a-service from commercial companies for specific missions on rapid timelines. And Congress likes it too, dedicating $40 million for the program in its latest appropriations bill. 

With so many different government organizations buying commercial products and data, however, there is the inevitable risk of some buying the same thing. 

“We work really closely with the NRO on the access to commercial data, to make sure that we’re not buying the data twice,” Guetlein said. “We work really closely with … NGA to make sure on the analytics side, I’m not duplicating that effort, that if I’ve already got the data coming down from [government satellites], I’m not going off and rebuying it.” 

Not duplicating efforts is one thing. Coordinating them to maximize time and money spent is another. Col. Rich Kniseley, head of the Commercial Space Office, said his team is working on an agreement with the NRO to improve their teamwork. 

“The agreement is in the final stages of approval,” Kniseley said in a statement. “The agreement provides a mechanism for the NRO and COMSO to utilize each other’s contracts as well as transfer funds between organizations.” 

Breaking Defense first reported on the agreement. 

Still more agreements may be coming—Guetlein said the Space Force, NRO, and NGA are “putting in place the programmatic structures to jointly go buy these capabilities together, to govern these capabilities together, then looking at legally, how can I distribute the data?” 

Whitworth said NGA is helping the cause with its Joint Mission Management Center, which brings together services, combatant commands, and other intelligence agencies to make sure everyone’s on the same page. 

“No matter what you have in the way of memoranda of agreement, or any sort of interagency agreement that might be where we’re going to go … you’ve got to have a place where everybody works together,” Whitworth said. 

The JMMC, which has reached initial operational capability, is that place, agreed Whitworth and Guetlein. In the long term, Whitworth said he actually hopes the center gets smaller due to automation and established lines of cooperation. More immediately, however, he said his priority is to get more Space Forces members into the center and working with the NGA more broadly.

“More Guardians at NGA—this is something we’ve talked about, and it’s already happening,” Whitworth said. “So this has already been realized. The JMMC is for real. It is now in its initial operating capability status, and there are plans for even more Guardians to be there.” 

Guetlein, for his part, said the center and the other agreements in the works are setting up a massive change in the relationship between the military and intelligence community. 

“I think what you’re going to see is—not five to 10 years from now, I think it’s two to three years from now—a seamless integration of Title 10, Title 50, a sharing of data like we’ve never seen before, a common operating picture that we’ve been trying to chase my entire career.” 

Commander of Space Force’s Greenland Base Fired over Comments About Vance Visit

Commander of Space Force’s Greenland Base Fired over Comments About Vance Visit

The commander of the U.S. military base in Greenland has been fired after sending an email to base personnel distancing herself from Vice President J.D. Vance’s comments about the Danish territory that President Donald Trump wants to annex.

USSF Col. Susannah Meyers was removed as commander of Pituffik Space Base, the northernmost U.S. military base that serves as a missile warning, space surveillance, and satellite control base on Greenland, April 10, a Space Force spokesperson said in a statement. The service cited a “loss of confidence in her ability to lead.”

Hours earlier, Military.com reported Meyers, then-commander of the 821st Space Base Group, sent an email to base personnel in March that distanced herself from Vance’s criticism of Denmark’s control of the island that the vice president made during a visit to the base. A Space Force spokesperson indicated that Meyers’ comments were political, leading to her dismissal.

“Commanders are expected to adhere to the highest standards of conduct, especially as it relates to remaining nonpartisan in the performance of their duties,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

“Actions to undermine the chain of command or to subvert President Trump’s agenda will not be tolerated at the Department of Defense,” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell added in a post on X, citing the report.

Meyers was removed from command by Col. Kenneth Klock, the commander of Space Base Delta 1, the Space Force said, and Col. Shawn Lee has assumed her responsibilities. Meyers had overseen the base since last July. Parnell did not respond to a request for comment when asked if Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth personally ordered Meyers’ removal.

Greenland is a territory of Denmark, a NATO ally of the U.S. Trump has said he wants to annex Greenland and said he has not ruled out using military force to do so. Vance’s brief visit to Pituffik Space Base in late March prompted objections from Danish and Greenlandic officials. Pituffik Space Base, formerly known as Thule Air Base when it was controlled by the Air Force, has long been a key outpost for the U.S. military, first as a Strategic Air Command base during the Cold War and later taking on space-related missions.

“Our message to Denmark is very simple,” Vance said during his visit to the base. “You have not done a good job by the people of Greenland. You have underinvested in the people of Greenland, and you have underinvested in the security of this incredible, beautiful landmass.”

In an email a few days later to base personnel, including Airmen and Guardians, Meyers wrote that she had reflected on “actions taken, the words spoken, and how it must have affected each of you,” according to the Military.com report. U.S. officials said Meyers’ reported remarks are authentic.

“I do not presume to understand current politics, but what I do know is the concerns of the U.S. administration discussed by Vice President Vance on Friday are not reflective of Pituffik Space Base,” Meyers wrote, according to the outlet.

The Trump administration recently fired Navy Vice Adm. Soshana Chatfield as the U.S. representative to the NATO Military Committee and Air Force Gen. Timothy Haugh as commander of U.S. Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency. In those cases, the administration did not publicly explain its rationale for the firings or accuse the officers of engaging in political discourse.

In February, the Trump administration fired Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti, and Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. Jim Slife. Gen. Dan Caine, a retired three-star officer who was tapped by Trump as Brown’s replacement, was confirmed as chairman by the Senate April 11.

Caine Confirmed as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs; First Air Guardsman in the Job

Caine Confirmed as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs; First Air Guardsman in the Job

Lt. Gen. Dan Caine was confirmed as the 22nd Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by the Senate early April 11, making history as the first Air National Guardsman to take on the nation’s top uniformed job.

Caine is the sixth Airman to be Chairman and succeeds Air Force Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., who was abruptly dismissed from the job by President Donald Trump in February. He was approved on a wide bipartisan basis, 60-25. 

Because Caine retired as a lieutenant general in January, the Senate also granted him a fourth star. By law, the chairman typically must have experience in a four-star job, either as a service chief or a combatant commander, but the President can waive that requirement.  

Caine is the first three-star to ascend directly to the chairmanship, and the first retired officer in decades to return to service to be chairman. 

An F-16 pilot early in his career, Caine has perhaps the most varied and unusual background of any Chairman in history. He has spent time as a White House fellow with the Department of Agriculture, a policy director for the White House Homeland Security Council, a commander of a Joint Special Operations Task Force in Iraq, director of the Pentagon’s highly secretive Special Access Programs Office, and the Pentagon liaison to the CIA. He also had several stints at U.S. Special Operations Command, including time as Deputy Commanding General of U.S. Central Command’s Special Ops Component and concurrently as the Deputy Commanding General for Special Operations for the campaign in Iraq against the Islamic State group. 

“The Air & Space Forces Association looks forward to working with Gen. Dan Caine in his new role as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” said AFA President & CEO retired Lt. Gen. Burt Field. “Without Air and Space power we cannot win a modern war against a peer competitor, especially if conflict erupts in a theater as vast as the Indo-Pacific. General Caine’s experience in the Intelligence and Special Operations communities will be invaluable as the Department of Defense evolves to address today’s growing threat environment.” 

At his confirmation hearing April 1, Caine touted that background as an asset at a potential pivot point in history. 

 “Yes, Senators, I acknowledge that I’m an unconventional nominee. … For many Americans, I’m an unknown leader,” Caine said. Yet, “these are unconventional times,” he added later. 

Now, Caine is set to be sworn in as the Pentagon confronts global crises—Russia’s punishing invasion of Ukraine drags on amid uncertain peace talks, Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen continue to harass shipping vessels in the Red Sea despite a major air campaign against them, and China continues to build up its military and conduct aggressive maneuvers around Taiwan. 

As chairman, Caine will not have operational control over any troops. He will, however, be the senior military adviser to President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. 

“Congratulations to Dan ‘Razin’ Caine on his confirmation in the Senate as the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Your leadership will be a welcomed/vital part of ensuring we return the Dept. of Defense back to the American warfighter,” Hegseth wrote in a post on social media.

During his confirmation hearing, Caine vowed to remain apolitical in his job. His focus, he said, will be on urging the military services to find faster ways to field technology that will preserve the nation’s military superiority. He also voiced support for the Pentagon’s nuclear modernization efforts and argued the military must rebuild its electronic warfare skills after years of decay. 

Despite the unusual circumstances around his nomination—Brown was the first Chairman dismissed from the job since Gen. Peter Pace was not renominated in 2007—Caine glided to confirmation with more than a dozen votes from Democrats and support from every Republican present. 

Defense industry groups were quick to congratulate Caine on his confirmation. 

“Lieutenant General Caine’s commitment to improving the speed and adaptability of the Department of Defense’s requirements and acquisition processes and to harnessing the capabilities of the entire defense industrial base will be an asset to our national security as we seek to deter our adversaries and deliver peace through strength,” Aerospace Industries Association President and CEO Eric Fanning said in a statement. “We look forward to working with him to keep the United States strong and secure.” 

Air Force Using Generative AI to Help Modernize Legacy Software

Air Force Using Generative AI to Help Modernize Legacy Software

Military software developers are using generative AI-powered coding assistants to help them modernize decades-old legacy codebases, officials said this week.  

And the Department of the Air Force Bot Operations Team (DAFBOT), part of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, says it is leading the way.  

AI tools to assist legacy code modernization is “probably my biggest ask for industry right now, because that is the exact problem that we’re dealing with: Trying to find more efficient, effective ways to modernize that legacy [code] faster,” said Jason Hunter, digital transformation program manager at the Forge, a Navy software factory based in Riverdale, Md.  

Hunter told an audience of defense contractors at AFCEA Northern Virginia’s Innovation IT Day event April 10 that AI-powered code assistants can help modernize huge, decades-old legacy codebases in obsolete computer languages like Fortran and COBOL.  

“I do have a lot of interest in bringing AI, large language models [LLMs], some of the code assistant [tools] into our environment,” he said, noting the scale of the task.  

“We’ve got a couple of baselines that are anywhere from 7 million to 15 million lines [of code] that are developed over 30-plus years.”

On top of that, documentation is often incomplete or missing.  

“If there are any developers in the audience, or if you work with developers, you know: Sometimes they comment code well, sometimes that doesn’t happen. Sometimes there’s documentation. Sometimes … not,” said Hunter. 

DOD Chief Software Officer Rob Vietmeyer told Air & Space Forces Magazine on the sidelines of the event that these legacy systems have become “a boat anchor,” a huge drag on the department’s innovation efforts. He said AI-powered code assistant tools could “help us decompose some of these monolithic legacy architectures” and rebuild the code using modern IT architectures like microservices. 

Code assistant tools use large language models (LLMs) to generate computer code, in the same way LLM-powered chatbots like ChatGPT generate human language.  

These tools enable so-called low code or no code software development, where normal English instructions from the user are translated into computer language by the chatbot. Low/no code tools are widely available in the commercial marketplace, but the process of recreating one codebase in a different computer language, known as refactoring, is a different challenge. 

The Department of the Air Force Bot Operations Team (DAFBOT), announced this week that they had successfully refactored applications originally written in obsolete COBOL into Java using LLMs. 

It is a process DAFBOT Chief Technology Officer Jude Stanley compared in a statement to taking a document originally written in a combination of Sanskrit and Mandarin and translating it, first into Latin and then into English. 

“The challenge lies in ensuring that the English version conveys the same narrative as the original combined text, capturing all its nuances. Legacy code bases are highly customized and unique to their capabilities,” said Stanley. 

The military faces particular challenges because of security concerns about LLMs, which typically hoover up data to train themselves and their successors and may require specialized chips and other hardware to run, because of their massive computing demand. 

“What has been a struggle for us is that our code sits in a classified environment where … we have some limits and constraints from what type of hardware is necessarily available with that. So we’re looking at a couple of different models to bring in some things to pilot and investigate here over the next year,” Hunter said of the Navy software factory The Forge. 

“Maybe AI can help us modernize our legacy systems,” added Ana Kreiensieck, software modernization lead in the Department of Defense CIO’s office. “But legacy systems, that’s a complex situation, right? And it requires some governance and some decision-making.”

For example, how much of the old system had to be preserved? How much could safely be modernized? A step-by-step approach, even to AI-powered transformation, might be best, she suggested. 

“We’ve seen success,” Kreiensieck said, “with that strangler fig pattern where you take it piece by piece, until you modernize the [whole] system.” 

New Book Captures Minuteman Missile Art Before it Disappears

New Book Captures Minuteman Missile Art Before it Disappears

A new coffee table book pays tribute to generations of Airmen by recording the art they created in nuclear missile facilities across the country. 

Released late last year, “The Silent Sentinels” is a 324-page feast of murals, patches, cartoons, poems, painted ceiling tiles, and even song lyrics that capture the lives of thousands of missileers, maintainers, security forces, chefs, and other Airmen who have kept a 24/7 watch over America’s Minuteman nuclear missile fleet since 1958.

The watch continues to this day, but the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile is due to replace the Minuteman III—already more than 40 years past its initial planned service life—within the next decade. The new weapon will require a massive infrastructure refresh, so the replacement plan included an agreement to preserve cultural resources in and around the old Minuteman sites.

The hallway leading up to a Launch Control Center at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont. Photo courtesy of the U.S. Air Force via “The Silent Sentinels.”

The Association of Air Force Missileers took up the cause, which was a chance to preserve the art not only at the three active Minuteman bases, but also at installations that shuttered their silos over the years.

“The purpose of this book was not just for us in the association to gather our history, but to share that story with the rest of our country and for generations to come,” said retired Col. Jim Warner, executive director of AAFM and the author of “The Silent Sentinels.”

Warner hopes to get the book out to ROTC detachments and other places where Air Force hopefuls can learn more about a career in missiles. Warner would have benefited from a book like that when he first became a missileer in 1974.

“I had no clue what the job was,” he told Air & Space Forces Magazine. “Now I look back at it as one of the best things I ever did. We want to share that story with the American public and with the Air Force.”

“Evolution of Missiles” by retired Maj. Jim Sneddon. Image courtesy “The Silent Sentinels”

The book starts with a history of the Minuteman stretching back to 1958, when the missile was first conceived as a “simple, low-maintenance, reliable, and highly survivable ICBM capable of maintaining alert status for long periods of time” and hitting targets more than 5,000 nautical miles away.

The first Minuteman wing stood up at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont., in 1962, followed by Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D., and Minot Air Force Base, N.D., in 1963, then Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., and F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo., in 1964, the same year a sixth wing began construction at Grand Forks Air Force Base, N.D. 

By 1967, about 1,000 Minuteman missiles were on alert across the five wings, but by then the Minuteman II was already on alert at Grand Forks. The Minuteman II had better range, accuracy, and onboard memory than the first version. The Minuteman III, which first went on alert in 1970, was even better.

The wings at Ellsworth, Whiteman, and Grand Forks have since closed down, but about 400 missiles remain operational at Minot, Malmstrom, and F.E. Warren. The missiles are stored in underground silos called launch facilities. Every 10 launch facilities are controlled by a Launch Control Center (LCC), an underground capsule where missileers serve 24-hour shifts. About 60 to 70 feet above them is the missile alert facility (MAF), where missile crews and support staff live and rest when not on duty. Many take remote college classes on their down time there.

It can take hours to drive from the main base to a MAF, especially when snowfall makes driving over the dirt roads treacherous. The isolated conditions turn MAFs into heavily-fortified homes away from home, complete with chefs, security guards, and a facility manager who serves as a kind of den mother, handyman, and groundskeeper.

The interior wall of LCC Hotel 01 at Minot Air Force Base, N.D. Photo courtesy of the U.S. Air Force via “The Silent Sentinels.”

It’s not clear exactly when art first appeared on the walls of these facilities. Warner remembered art was not allowed during the early days of his career in the 1970s, so it may have first appeared in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Pride in the unit is a common theme; Squadron emblems and mascots, including Red Dawgs, Screaming Eagles, and Wolf Packs, appeared on blast doors, blank LCC surfaces, and tunnel junction walls, often with American flags, missiles, skulls, or ruined Soviet flags in the background.

MAF-specific art tends to be light-hearted. The MAFs are designated by radio alphabet, such as Hotel 01, Oscar 01, and Golf 01, a prosaic system that nonetheless inspired generations of artist-Airmen. Oscar 01 at Whiteman, for example, featured Sesame Street’s Oscar the Grouch on one of its blast doors, and Hotel 01 at Minot has a “no vacancy” sign on the wall of its LCC.

“Fallout” game theme on an elevator shaft at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo. designed by Tech Sgt Raymond M. Kiser, and painted by Tech Sgt Donny Caffey and Tech Sgt Chris Morgan. Photo courtesy of the U.S. Air Force via “The Silent Sentinels.”

Elsewhere are pop culture references, including Star Wars, Looney Tunes, and Super Mario Bros. Life imitates art at F.E. Warren’s Golf 01, whose elevator shaft mural was inspired by the video game series Fallout, where players emerge from underground vaults into a world devastated by nuclear war. 

On the blast door of an LCC at Ellsworth is a reference to a Domino’s pizza ad promising delivery in 30 minutes or less, about the same amount of time it takes a Minuteman missile to reach its target. Originally the artist wanted to paint an American flag, but when he realized his shade of blue was off, he corrected with a Domino’s-style pizza box.

“A good artist knows when to pivot to get the job done!” Warner wrote.

The blast door of an LCC at Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D. painted by Capt Rob Drury and 1Lt Tony Gatlin. Image courtesy “The Silent Sentinels”

Slice of Life

Several cartoons capture the headaches of working with decades-old technology, which Warner could personally relate to. The LCCs are suspended on shock isolators meant to keep the capsule level in case of attack. Warner recalled one of the isolators gave way during an alert, so all of the maintainers and missileers stood on one corner of the capsule and jumped to try to level it out again.

“You do what you’ve got to do because the mission is so important,” he said.

From the K01 Captain’s Log at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont. Image courtesy “The Silent Sentinels”

Another theme was the long drive out to the MAF through wind and snow. Several MAF murals billed their locations as “over the edge” of the world or “to the end of the Earth … then left.”

“Every picture came with a story about the time they were stuck on alert because of a snowstorm, or the long drive over dirt roads to get to the middle of nowhere in North or South Dakota,” Warner said. “Life in that part of the country is very interesting, and when people get together to talk about it, it’s always those fun stories.”

A tunnel junction in and LCC at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo. Photo courtesy of the U.S. Air Force via “The Silent Sentinels.”

Several such stories were captured by The Groobers, a group of missileers assigned to F.E. Warren who started a folk-rock band in the mid-1970s. Their songs depict life in the missile fields, from boredom in the capsule to the hard work of missile maintainers.

“I don’t think we’ll ever forget playing an afternoon show in the rec center … and seeing two young wives of maintenance troops in the front row wiping away tears,” wrote one of The Groobers about performing their maintainer song.

Bringing the book together also helped bring the missileer community together, as alumni dug through their archives to find images to contribute.

“It was a great ‘walking down memory lane’ kind of experience.” Warner said.

The retired colonel still gets images that he wishes he could have included in the book. But the archival effort continues as AAFM’s core mission.

“Our purpose is to retain the heritage of all of the nuclear missile systems in the Air Force, to keep that community telling their stories, and then to educate the public about what our missileers have done and do today,” he said.

More information about “The Silent Sentinels” and where to buy it can be found here.

Space Force Looks to Go Big on Commercial: ‘Everything’s on the Table’

Space Force Looks to Go Big on Commercial: ‘Everything’s on the Table’

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo.—Space Force acquisition leaders were already looking to see if they could shift some of their biggest programs to use commercial services or technology, but one of President Donald Trump’s executive orders, signed April 9, that could super-charge that effort. 

Now, the service’s vision for going beyond conventional Pentagon-industry partnerships has an even greater sense of urgency, those leaders said at the Space Symposium. 

“It’s a change in our culture, and it’s a change in our thinking,” Lt. Gen. Philip A. Garrant, head of Space Systems Command, said of the emphasis on commercial space capabilities. “It goes all the way back to the programming piece as we develop the budgets, because if we don’t pre-plan it, by the time it gets into their strategy, it’s too late. The PEOs need to make sure strategy is included as a forethought, not as an afterthought. That’s when the real power is going to happen. And [as] you’re seeing, we’re finally putting our money where the mouth is.” 

The Space Force’s embrace of commercial has been a long time coming. A year ago, leaders unveiled their first Commercial Space Strategy after months of work, pledging to build “hybrid architectures” of government, allied, and commercial satellites and systems across a wide range of missions.  

By the end of the 2024, Vice Chief of Space Operations Gen. Michael A. Guetlein and then-service acquisition executive Frank Calvelli issued guidance to program executive officers, said Col. Rich Kniseley, head of the Commercial Space Office: “Look over their mission area requirements and … see which ones of those can we now move over to commercial, international, and what has to be purpose-built,” Kniseley said. 

Calvelli left his seat at the change in administrations, but his military deputy, Maj. Gen. Stephen Purdy, took things a step further in early 2025, when he assumed the role of acting SAE. 

“Every major program at SSC, all the traditional programs, have taken an excursion. They’re not stopping the program of record, but they’ve taken a side excursion,” Garrant said. “And the ask was, ‘if I, Gen. Purdy, were to cancel your program, how would you meet your requirements purely commercial?’ 

“So in my mind, it’s a fantastic exercise. It nests right with the commercial strategy. It’s aligned with the pivot we’re trying to make. And everything’s on the table. … Nobody got a pass. Everybody has to do this excursion of, ‘Could I start over and meet my requirements commercially?’” The results of those drills aren’t in yet, but “this wasn’t just an academic exercise.” 

Trump’s executive order, aimed at modernizing and reforming the notoriously slow Pentagon acquisition process, serves as an “exclamation point” to the message Space Force leaders had been sending, Kniseley said. It calls for the Pentagon to develop a plan for speeding up acquisition, to include a “first preference for commercial solutions.” 

In some areas, the Space Force and its predecessor organizations have already shown they can do it. Todd Gossett, an executive with satellite communications provider SES Space & Defense, said during a panel discussion that SATCOM companies have “seen, over the past decade, a much more purposeful integration of these commercial capabilities into the military alongside military purpose-built capabilities and what we now call hybrid space architecture.” 

A notional rendering of a mesh network in space. Photo Credit: Northrop Grumman

In a roundtable with reporters, Charlotte Gerhart, deputy director of military communications and position, navigation, and timing at SSC, confirmed that approach, saying she and her team are “continuously looking [at] ‘what can we pull in? How can we be faster and less expensive and more capable by pulling in the newest, latest technology commercial uses?’” 

Still, the U.S. military space enterprise is known for taking decades and spending billions of dollars to procure its own exquisite, custom systems. Simply the possibility of canceling contracts that are years along, worth hundreds of millions of dollars, is a major shift. 

A “frozen middle” of procurement officers who resist a more flexible, commercial-friendly approach doesn’t help, Gossett said. 

Kniseley, himself a career acquisition officer, agreed, saying program managers are inclined to focus on cost, schedule, and performance without considering commercial alternatives. 

Those alternatives may not fulfill every requirement in a program, Kniseley noted, but they can speed help to warfighters in the field. That alone makes them valuable as the U.S. races to keep pace with its adversaries, said Air Force Col. Eddie Ferguson, chief of advanced warfighter capabilities and resources analysis division at U.S. Space Command. 

“We have a 2027 timeframe that [SPACECOM Commander Gen. Stephen N. Whiting] gave us,” he said. That demands using commercial partnerships, “preferably with dual-use technologies, because that’s what’s going to deliver in the timeframe that we’re looking at.” 

There are other hurdles besides procurement officer inertia, though.  

Commercial leaders frequently tout the innovation of American industry, but need to show they can meet the stressing demands of the military, which often go beyond what’s required for a commercial product. 

“The challenge is, can you develop enough trust? Because most of us are coming from Silicon Valley,” or other non-traditional backgrounds,” said Joe Morrison, general manager of remote sensing at Umbra, a sensing and imaging firm. “There’s been a lot of big promises, [but] a lot of under-delivery. Can you trust us enough to share with us what your actual needs are?” 

Once the government does that, industry still needs to fulfill its own, commercial purposes. 

“It is a fundamental tension in the relationship where we are developing something that we think is the best way to solve a problem, and may be different than what a government customer has asked for or has envisioned for that need,” said Michael Madrid, chief growth officer at Starfish Space, a satellite servicing company. 

The military, on the other hand, can’t afford to rely on a company that might go out of business or want to pull out of an agreement when the fighting starts and their satellites are being attacked. 

“As we start to work with new … companies, we evaluate their financial viability, long term, Garrant said. But they are then “part of our Department of Defense architecture. You’re now at risk. You’re a legitimate target, right? What are the implications there?”  

A clear and consistent message conveyed when dealing with companies is that those “providing services or capabilities to the United States military understand the risk,” added Ferguson. 

Nevertheless, the industry and military space officials agreed that the ties between them are set to grow. 

“It takes a lot of top-down pressure in order to change culture, while also building up from the bottom,” Kniseley said. “So having an executive order that says ‘go commercial first,’ having the Vice Chief of Space Operations and the SAE look to prioritize commercial, having Congress put it into the NDAA to prioritize commercial … you’ve got all the top-down pressure. But now it’s on the program executive officers to change how they procure things.”