Senators Urge National Guard Chief Nominee to Stop Cuts at Bases

Senators Urge National Guard Chief Nominee to Stop Cuts at Bases

A bipartisan trio of senators urged the likely next National Guard boss on Sept. 12 to hold off on proposed staff cuts to Air National Guard bases in their states, arguing their missions should shield them from top-down attempts to downsize.

The Air Guard’s proposal to rebalance the number of full-time workers and dual-status technicians at installations across the country would hurt the military’s ability to protect the homeland and meet combat requirements around the globe, Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), and Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) argued at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill. The lawmakers criticized the plan as short-sighted and lacking input from other branches of the military as well as U.S. commanders on each continent.

Their complaints secured promises from Air Force Lt. Gen. Steven S. Nordhaus, the nominee to lead the National Guard Bureau, to slow-roll the changes as needed and to consider other options for managing the workforce.

“Communication, transparency, I think, is the hallmark to make sure that we get out to all the stakeholders and understand points of view from each side,” Nordhaus said. “Then we need to communicate that up and back, and make sure that we understand any of the implications.”

The Associated Press reported in April the changes are part of an overarching plan to balance top-earning positions among the National Guard’s 54 state and territorial units by Oct. 1. A spokesperson at National Guard headquarters did not immediately answer Sept. 12 how many jobs are jeopardized in total or why those cuts are under consideration.

In New Hampshire, Pease Air National Guard Base would lose 12 full-time positions, while another 22 jobs would be downgraded from full-time Active Guard Reserve roles to dual-status technician jobs, “resulting in the loss of experienced maintainers and aviators,” Shaheen said. Technician roles pay less and require different duties than AGR jobs, which essentially function as Active-Duty military positions. 

“I believe this was a short-sighted decision, that it was done with consideration to neither the capacity of the 157th [Air Refueling Wing] in New Hampshire, nor the need of the KC-46 to meet its global refueling requirements,” Shaheen said.

She added that the National Guard expects its ability to support U.S. Transportation Command, which manages the daily flow of troops and equipment around the world, will fall by 23 percent as aerial refueling capacity sits among the command’s top concerns.

Shaheen said she discussed the proposed changes with Pease Airmen this weekend ahead of their deployment to southwest Asia. Their departure marks the Air Force’s first operational deployment of the new KC-46A Pegasus tanker jet in service of combat overseas since the initial aircraft was delivered in 2019.

“They are excited about this milestone, but they are unfortunately very worried about what the re-leveling would mean for their ability to do their jobs,” Shaheen said.

Nordhaus said states can request a one-year exemption from the cuts as the Guard considers its next steps. Pease has secured such an exemption, he added.

“I do promise to make sure we take a full, transparent look at this and to make sure that we’re meeting mission requirements with full-time requirements,” he said.

At Selfridge Air National Guard Base in Michigan, the Guard looks to trim up to 117 full-time civilian employees, including 15 contracting personnel, Peters said. Selfridge is home to A-10 Thunderbolt II attack planes, KC-135 Stratotanker refueling jets, and aircraft from multiple other military and federal civilian organizations.

“It is like an Active-Duty base,” Peters said. “It’s not an Air National Guard facility that shares a civilian airfield.”

He asked Nordhaus to seek an independently run manpower study that compares Selfridge’s needs to Active-Duty installations before going through with the staff cuts. The three-star acknowledged he would consider that option.

And in Alaska, the National Guard has delayed its plan to downgrade the jobs of about 80 employees to dual-status tech roles, a move local military leaders said would hurt the Alaska Guard’s ability to detect ballistic missile launches toward the U.S. homeland as well as its capacity to conduct search-and-rescue missions in Alaska’s most rugged and remote regions.

Sullivan said the plan has pushed some of Alaska’s long-serving troops to exit the military.

“My own view is that there [were] a lot of mistakes that happened,” Sullivan said. “The biggest mistake was the Guard, at the highest levels, didn’t check in with the joint force on, ‘Hmm, is this initiative we’re undertaking going to impact the readiness of the joint force?’”

In written responses submitted to the panel ahead of his confirmation hearing, Nordhaus said he does not anticipate major changes to the National Guard’s end strength of more than 325,000 troops.

“However, as the strategic and operational landscape evolves, the National Guard requirements must align to meet the needs of our states and nation,” he wrote. “As the primary combat reserve of the Army and Air Force, I would use the [authorities] available to ensure the National Guard remains commensurate with its Active components.”

Nordhaus’s confirmation hearing comes as the National Guard Bureau has struggled to secure a full slate of Senate-approved leaders in the wake of multiple retirements. The bureau’s top job has sat empty since Gen. Daniel R. Hokanson retired in August; other current vacancies include the National Guard vice chief and the Air National Guard’s top officer. Army National Guard boss Lt. Gen. Jonathan M. Stubbs is currently serving as the bureau’s acting chief.

Nordhaus currently runs the Air Force branch that oversees operations in North America, including missions to secure American airspace with NORAD. He is a decorated fighter pilot who also served as the Guard Bureau’s ops director and commanded multiple fighter wings.

If confirmed, the pending four-star would inherit a National Guard stretched thin by missions that range from supporting federal agents along the U.S.-Mexico border to driving school buses to cyber defense—plus frequently serving as first responders when military crises erupt around the world. Using Guardsmen to fill in the gaps left by local worker shortages is jeopardizing the Guard’s combat readiness, said Sen. Roger Wicker, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Nordhaus told lawmakers he expects his most pressing challenges will include recruiting and retention, combat readiness, and modernizing the force.

Despite the often unrelenting pace of activations and deployments, Nordhaus said the Guard’s current data indicate that tempo is not significantly hurting recruiting and retention. Both the Army and Air Guards expect to miss their fiscal 2025 recruiting goals by “about 700 to 800” troops, he said.

“I will direct an operational training team standup to review these challenges and provide recommendations within the first 90 days of being confirmed,” he told the committee.

In written comments, Nordhaus also declined to answer whether he supports the Air Force’s proposal to move space-focused Air Guard units into the Space Force. The idea has sparked a bitter feud between military leaders in Washington, state Guard officials, and lawmakers who disagree over whether doing so would hurt military readiness and force Guardsmen into Active-Duty roles.

“Space superiority is critical to our Joint Force and our allies and partners,” Nordhaus told the committee in written answers. “For the last 27 years, the National Guard has performed critical space missions including missile warning, space domain awareness, and surveillance and reconnaissance. Until a decision is made, and if confirmed, I will continue to support the mission to ensure our forces are ready.”

Nordhaus added that he will continue to seek solutions to provide free health care to the tens of thousands of Guardsmen who the Bureau believes go uninsured while not on military orders. The cost of doing so has proved prohibitive: Hokanson said in 2022 that providing no-fee TRICARE to non-activated troops could cost more than $700 million each year.

Guard officials argue that protecting the health of all Guardsmen will lead to a stronger, more reliable force once they’re called to duty.

Air Force Elevates AFSOUTH as New ‘Service Component Command’

Air Force Elevates AFSOUTH as New ‘Service Component Command’

As Maj. Gen. David A. Mineau accepted the guidon for Air Forces Southern on Sept. 11, it was Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin handing it over, not the commander of Air Combat Command. That’s because Air Forces Southern is no longer under ACC as part of the 12th Air Force, but has been elevated to a “service component command,” reporting directly to CSAF.

AFSOUTH now has “the same access, the same decision-making processes, and the same meetings” asU.S. Air Forces in Europe, Pacific Air Forces, and Air Mobility Command, Allvin said during the ceremony.

U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin, left, and the Commander of U.S. Southern Command, Gen. Laura Richardson, right, complete a Change of Command and activation ceremony for Air Forces Southern at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, Sep. 11, 2024. The ceremony marked a significant change in the command as it marked the activation of Air Forces Southern becoming a Service Component Command. (U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Rachel Maxwell)

The change is part of the Air Force’s “re-optimization” for great power competition, in which Allvin is seeking to redefine USAF’s traditional conception of major commands. His new constructs designates each MajCom as either an “institutional command,” responsible for organizing, training, and equipping fgorces, or “service component commands” responsible for presenting forces to unified combatant commands. In doing so, he has also rethought how Numbered Air Forces fit into this broader picture.

AFSOUTH was formally a component of the 12th Air Force (Air Forces Southern) and reported to ACC. Soon to follow are: 

  • Air Forces Central (9th Air Force)
  • Air Forces Cyber (16th Air Force)
  • Air Forces North and Air Forces Space (1st Air Force)

      Air Forces Southern is responsible for USAF’s presence in the Caribbean and Central and South America—not typically an area where the Air Force has had to devote many resources. 

      But U.S. Souther Command boss Army Gen. Laura J. Richardson and others has warned that China and Russia are seeking to expand their influence in the region, growing the threat in the U.S.’s backyard. 

      “The mission we do here is not talked about a lot, it’s not in the news a lot but it is so critically important to our nation, to our hemisphere,” said Mineau. “The expertise you all have not just in the application of airpower and cyber, but your knowledge in Latin America and the Caribbean is world-class.” 

      Allvin said elevating AFSOUTH and other component commands recognizes exactly that. “It is an acknowledgment and a recognition that competition is global,” said Allvin. “The challenges are just as difficult across the board. They may be different in nature, but they’re the same in consequence.” 

      Maj. Gen. Evan Pettus, outgoing Air Forces Southern commander, right, shakes hands with Maj. Gen. David Mineau, center, newly-appointed AFSOUTH commander after completing a Change of Command ceremony at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, Sep. 11, 2024. At the direction of the Secretary of the Air Force, Air Forces Southern was elevated to a Service Component Command. The Air Force is organizing its major commands, or MAJCOMs, into Institutional Commands, responsible for organizing, training, and equipping Airmen, and Service Component Commands, responsible for preparing Airmen for warfighting in a combatant command’s area of responsibility. The changes are part of the Department of the Air Force’s Great Power Competition initiative. (U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Rachel Maxwell)

      Institutional Commands 

      • Air Combat Command 
      • Air Force Materiel Command 
      • Air Education and Training Command (to become Airman Development Command) 
      • Integrated Capabilities Command*

            Component Commands 

            • Pacific Air Forces (presents to U.S. Indo-Pacific Command) 
            • U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa (U.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command) 
            • Air Mobility Command (U.S. Transportation Command) 
            • Air Force Global Strike Command (U.S. Strategic Command) 
            • Air Force Special Operations Command (U.S. Special Operations Command) 
            • Air Forces Southern (U.S. Southern Command) 
            • Air Forces Central (U.S. Central Command)* 
            • Air Forces Cyber (U.S. Cyber Command)*
            • Air Forces North and Air Forces Space (U.S. Northern Command and U.S. Space Command)*

                            *Future 

                            Anduril Unveils New Low-Cost Cruise Missiles Meant for Large-Scale Production

                            Anduril Unveils New Low-Cost Cruise Missiles Meant for Large-Scale Production

                            Anduril Industries has revealed its “Barracuda” family of cruise missiles, intended to bulk up U.S. military stockpiles with a low-cost weapon that can be produced in large numbers by minimally trained labor with unspecialized tools.

                            The air-breathing weapons as yet have not been fitted with sensors, as customer needs are still undefined, but the weapons are in flight test, company officials told reporters Sept. 11. The Barracuda family is intended to be rapidly upgradable through software and an open-systems architecture.

                            The family of weapons comprises the Barracuda-100, -250, and -500.

                            The -500 is meant to be “cargo launched,” said Diem Salmon, Anduril vice president for air dominance and strike. This refers to the Air Force’s “Rapid Dragon” concept of launching pallets of cruise missiles from the back of a C-17 or C-130 transport, which has been tested using AGM-158 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSMs).

                            It is also the kind of mission the Air Force and Defense Innovation Unit are exploring for their Enterprise Test Vehicle program, which got underway in June. Anduril is one of four competitors for the effort and is pitching the Barracuda-500, Salmon said. The other companies in the running are Integrated Solutions for Systems, Inc.; Leidos Dynetics; and Zone 5 Technologies. Salmon couldn’t comment on the ETV program progress.

                            The pallet-launched missiles “do not necessarily require aircraft integration,” she said. The -250, meanwhile, is designed to be carried internally on the F-35 and other platforms.

                            The Barracuda is “available in configurations offering 500+ nautical miles of range, 100+ pounds of payload capacity, 5 Gs of maneuverability, and more than 120 minutes of loitering time,” the company said in a press release.

                            “All Barracudas are compatible with a host of payloads and employment mechanisms, support a variety of different missions, and provide warfighters with an adaptable and upgradeable capability to counter evolving threats,” the company said.

                            Anduril is “targeting 30 percent less cost than systems that are comparable in performance,” Salmon said, but she did not offer comparisons with specific weapons. The company thinks that this level of savings can be achieved by reusing subsystems and easier manufacture with low-cost materials.

                            “So, rather than designing bespoke capabilities for each single weapon system, how do we make this simpler?” Salmon said. Open architectures is one solution, while designing the missile to be made by a factory worker with little specialized knowledge, using a small number of tools and parts, is another.

                            “A single Barracuda takes 50 percent less time to produce, requires 95 percent fewer tools, and 50 percent fewer parts than competing solutions on the market today,” the company said in press materials. “As a result, the Barracuda family of AAVs is 30 percent cheaper on average than other solutions, enabling affordable mass and cost-effective, large-scale employment.”

                            Anduril rolled out its “Arsenal” manufacturing plant idea in recent weeks, teasing announcements about weapons like Barracuda and its “Fury” Collaborative Combat Aircraft that would be made in the state-of-the art factory. It is proceeding from the assumption that the U.S. needs 10 times the number of precision weapons it now has in order to deter China and not “run out of stuff” to shoot in the first few weeks of a major conflict, Anduril chief strategy officer Chris Brose said.

                            “We’ve been at work on this for a few years,” Brose said. “This is a real system. It is already a part of real programs. It’s flying, and we’re really excited to finally be able to talk more about it publicly.

                            “The problem that we are seeking to solve here, I think, is a familiar one to many of you, which is America and our allies and partners do not have enough weapons. Period, full stop. And we are not capable of producing the volume of weapons that we’re going to need to establish deterrence against a peer competitor.”

                            Brose noted wargames that showed that the U.S. runs out of critical munitions in the first few weeks of a conflict.

                            “Then we struggle, or theoretically would struggle, for a period of years to replenish all the weapons that we expended,” he said. “And I think Ukraine has put that problem in high relief for the past few years on far simpler tactical weapon systems, to say nothing of the larger critical munitions that are going to be so essential for an INDOPACOM scenario.”

                            Salmon said it’s “unrealistic for us to believe that we will know exactly how many we need to produce 10 years from now,” and factories will have to be able to efficiently “ramp up, and sometimes, you have to ramp down.”

                            She added Anduril is aiming to reduce parts count, tooling, and complexity and “rely more on commercial components.” The entire work force as a whole won’t be “bespoke to just one single system,” she said.

                            Brose said every variant of Barracuda “leverages core subsystems which are reusable across the family of systems. These are systems that can be assembled with tools, literally that you probably have in your garage—screwdrivers, pliers, things of that sort, so it is not gated in terms of its producibility on highly specialized tooling, highly specialized manufacturing processes, highly specialized labor, none of which we’re ever going to have enough of. It’s been designed with the exact opposite approach, which is, I have to leverage commercial supply chains as much as possible. I have to make the weapon as simple to produce and as simple to assemble as possible.”

                            All three variants are flying now, Salmon said.

                            “These are things that we’re actively working on day-to-day,” she said.

                            Air National Guard MC-130J Briefly Becomes a Bee-130J

                            Air National Guard MC-130J Briefly Becomes a Bee-130J

                            Over its 70 years of service, the C-130 and its variants have borne a range of weapons including cannons, cruise missiles, and radar jammers. But an MC-130J assigned to the Pennsylvania Air National Guard’s 193rd Special Operations Wing accidentally bore a uniquely fearsome weapon late last month: a swarm of honeybees.

                            “We’re considering a change in aircraft designation,” the wing joked in a video posted to Facebook on Sept. 4 of a man in a beekeeping mask scraping bees off the aircraft’s right side inflight air refueling pod. “How do we feel about Bee-130?”

                            The man was Jim Davis, a bee hobbyist with the central Pennsylvania-based Capital Area Beekeepers Association. The wing called him in to remove the bees rather than exterminate them.

                            “We identified, with the help of our civil engineers, they were honeybees,” said wing spokesperson Senior Master Sgt. Alexander Farver. “We knew how important honeybees are to the local ecosystem. So even though it was a slight inconvenience, we chose to protect and preserve them.”

                            mc-130j
                            A swarm of honeybees gathered on the inflight air refueling pod of a Pennsylvania Air National Guard MC-130J in late August, 2024. (Courtesy photo via 193rd Special Operations Wing)

                            It was Davis’ first time responding to a military base. Lethal as U.S. Airmen are, some threats demand an expert’s touch. 

                            “Everyone was super friendly,” he said. “A few of them weren’t too sure they wanted to be that close to the bees.”

                            How did a swarm of bees wind up on the aircraft in the first place? There must have been another hive nearby, Davis said.

                            “What happens is the original hive makes a new queen, and then the old queen normally will gather up a large bundle of the nurse bees and the foraging bees and take off with them,” he explained. “They find a place where they can land until the scout bees can find a home for them. If we had left them on the plane, they would have probably found a new home within a day or so.”

                            Iowa State University describes swarming as “a natural process in the life of a honeybee colony” which often occurs in response to crowding within the colony.

                            Indeed, the Pennsylvania bees had originally stopped on a maintenance stand but moved when the stand was moved, though some bees stayed behind and were removed by the beekeeper, who brushed them into a cardboard box. As frightening as a swarm of bees might look, this group of wanderers was not in a fighting mood.

                            “When you get a swarm like that, they are not interested in stinging or fighting or anything like that,” Davis said. “They’re just taking care of their queen. I could have gone up there with bare hands and got them in the box.”

                            honeybees
                            The swarm of honeybees that beekeeper Jim Davis gathered off an MC-130J based in Middletown, Penn. Aug. 27, 2024. Davis plans on providing the bees a home and giving the Middletown Airmen the resulting honey next year. (Courtesy photo via 193rd Special Operations Wing)

                            Honeybees feed prior to swarming, reducing their ability to sting, according to Iowa State University. They are also farther from their nest, which houses their offspring and food stores, so they “are less defensive and are unlikely to sting unless provoked.”

                            While honeybee swarms are often found on trees, houses, and even cars, they’re not a common sight at the 193rd SOW.

                            “In 32 years of aircraft maintenance I have never had to do this type of insect removal,” said Senior Master Sgt. Richard Fanning, flight chief for the 193rd Special Operations Aircraft Maintenance Squadron.

                            Still, honeybees have been spotted on other military aircraft including a T-6 in 2012, a C-17 and an F-22 in 2016, and a few Navy P-3s in 2008 and 2009. Navy ships also have to be cleared of stray swarms, with nine such removals in the San Diego, Calif., area between 2020 and 2023. The bees who landed on the F-22 did so for likely the same reasons as the ones who did on the MC-130J.

                            “Bee hives are constantly growing and they eventually become overcrowded,” Chief Master Sgt. Gregg Allen, 192nd Maintenance Group Quality Assurance chief and himself a beekeeper, said in a press release at the time. “Around springtime, the bees will make a new queen, scout for a new location and take half of the hive with them to that location.”

                            It was a good thing the bees wound up on the MC-130J, because Davis soon found them a new home.

                            “I normally rescue and keep three or four hives like this every year,” said Davis, who’s been caring for bees for about 10 years. “I took the bees from the aircraft and transferred them to their permanent home with me. They’re doing great, and I hope to give some of the honey they produce to the 193rd Airmen next year!”

                            ‘We Work in a Memorial’: Pentagon Leaders Remember 9/11

                            ‘We Work in a Memorial’: Pentagon Leaders Remember 9/11

                            Pentagon leaders honored the victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks in multiple ceremonies on the 23rd anniversary of the dark day that saw nearly 3,000 Americans die and shaped the U.S. military in the 21st century.

                            “On a Tuesday 23 years ago, the Pentagon awoke to a day like any other,” Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. said during a ceremony alongside Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III.

                            But on Sept. 11, 2001, at 9:37 a.m., a 757 jetliner, American Flight 77, flew into the side of the Pentagon, as horror also unfolded in New York and Pennsylvania.

                            “We don’t just work near a memorial. We work in a memorial,” said Austin, a retired four-star Army general who commanded troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. “Every day, we serve in the only surviving building struck by al-Qaeda on 9/11. And every day, we carry a powerful sense of purpose.”

                            Austin and Brown remembered 184 victims who were killed in the attack, either in the Pentagon or as passengers and crew aboard Flight 77 at the Pentagon Memorial, located outside the western side of the Pentagon where the building was hit and partially collapsed.

                            Around 6 a.m., as the sun rose, a giant American flag was unfurled near where Flight 77 crashed into the building, honoring an act by first responders more than two decades ago during recovery efforts.

                            “It is a constant reminder that 9/11 isn’t a part of our distant history,” Austin said, noting he has a piece of wreckage in his office to remind visitors of the losses. “It is entwined in the Department’s mission. And it’s captured in the stories of those who were here. We continue to honor the beloved teammates whom we lost, the first responders who raced toward the flames, the families who humble us with their resilience, and the survivors who continue to inspire us all.”

                            Elsewhere on that day in 2001, al-Qaeda-hijacked planes hit the World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York, which were destroyed. Flight 93, hijacked and headed towards Washington, crashed before it could reach its target after passengers intervened.

                            Though the Pentagon was repaired and the memorial opened seven years later, 9/11 profoundly shaped an entire generation of troops who went off to the Middle East as part of America’s Global War on Terror—with many service members enlisting after the attacks.

                            “In the year that followed 9/11, more than a quarter-million Americans with no prior military experience enlisted in the military and, with countless others, made a commitment to public service,” Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks said on Sept. 10 during a ceremony for Pentagon employees.

                            U.S. troops continue to combat al-Qaeda, its affiliates, and other terrorist groups inspired by similar ideologies. Austin led a moment of silence for the thousands of U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11.

                            “We are the United States of America,” Austin said. “We do not bend to terror.”

                            Later in the day, President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Austin, and Brown participated in a wreath-laying ceremony at the 9/11 Pentagon Memorial.

                            President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, and Joint Chiefs Chairman Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr., lay a wreath honoring the 184 lives lost at the Pentagon marking the 23rd anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States. DoD photo by Chad J. McNeeley
                            Addressing the Changing EW Environment

                            Addressing the Changing EW Environment

                            In conflicts with peer and near-peer adversaries, U.S. air crews will be contested in the air and on the airwaves. They’ll face not just kinetic attacks, but also radars, advanced air defense systems, and other electromagnetic effects seeking to disrupt their missions.

                            “The threat is advancing faster than we’ve ever seen before,” said Scott Bailie, who directs Advanced Electronic Warfare Solutions at BAE Systems. Adversaries have access to high-performance hardware, and they’re developing reconfigurable software-based systems, allowing them to field a range of new capabilities. “We need to learn to be faster and be more agile—with less information,” Bailie added.

                            That requires new programmatic approaches, Bailie said—and more collaboration. 

                            “How we contract, how we award, how we compete,” he said. “We need to be able to pivot, to adjust and adapt to the changing threat.”

                            At BAE Systems, Bailie said, agility is a mindset that starts with engineering for flexibility. “We’re looking to develop systems that are more open, more modular, more software-defined, as well as systems that can be upgraded in the field.”

                            For EW solutions, the goal is to disconnect the capability from the platform. Loosening those bonds “lets us roll out changes more quickly and adapt to the threat, without having to go through yearlong developmental test or operational test cycles,” Bailie said.

                            Fewer steps mean fewer delays. And using an open architecture opens the way for faster insertion of emerging technologies and capabilities. 

                            “Open architecture is a perfect example of how we’re developing faster and deploying faster,” Bailie said. “It also lets us take capabilities and move them across platforms faster. When we have standard interfaces, we’re not starting from scratch, developing a capability from day one on each individual platform. We can deploy it across the fleet very quickly.”

                            This open standards-based development strategy is accelerating the use of software-defined radios, for example. “It’s a transceiver that has well-defined hardware, firmware, and software interfaces,” Bailie said. It has a configurable analog RF front end, a processing element, and a transmitter. The capabilities of those components are brought to bear by modular software, where BAE Systems wants its software engineers to focus. 

                            “They’re spending their time developing algorithms, developing capabilities that we can deploy to the warfighter—not wasting it reinventing the wheel, understanding where to find data, how to transfer across interfaces,” he said. Similarly, openness enables engineers to identify the third-party applications and other best-of-breed solutions, whether from traditional or non-traditional suppliers. 

                            Commercial off-the-shelf hardware is also an opportunity to decrease timelines and save money. The electromagnetic spectrum is highly congested, and EW systems need to process a tremendous number of waveforms—both military and commercial—at any given instant. “That’s a big reason why we might look for a higher-performance processing,” Bailie said. “There’s a time and a place for COTS. There are opportunities where we need to look hard at custom solutions that bring the performance we need.”

                            Another way to speed the timeline is to design using models, which support more rapid iterative development. “Model-based system engineering is about defining requirements and capturing our design artifacts in a set of digital integrated tools,” Bailie said, “rather than working with independent static documents. When a change happens on an interface, for example, that change can propagate its way through the design.” 

                            Automating that process means everyone knows about the change right away. But  even if it’s not fully automatically updated, the modelling and design tools will “flag inconsistencies or issues with the update you’ve made.”

                            That heads off design errors that might have cost months or years of lost time in the past, solving those problems in minutes or days instead. The payoff is not just a more agile development process, Bailie said: It’s getting greater capability in the hands of warfighters, sooner. 

                            Air Force Academy Investigating Cadet’s Death on Campus

                            Air Force Academy Investigating Cadet’s Death on Campus

                            The U.S. Air Force Academy is investigating the death of a freshman cadet who was found unconscious in her Colorado Springs dormitory last week, the school said Sept. 5.

                            Cadet 4th Class Avery Koonce, 19, of Taylor, Texas, was discovered the night of Sept. 4 and did not respond to medics’ attempts at resuscitation, the academy said in a statement posted to social media. Her cause of death remains unclear.

                            Koonce’s death is the first reported fatality of a cadet at USAFA so far this academic year. The academy announced one off-campus cadet death for the 2023-24 academic year, and three—two on campus and off—in 2022-23.

                            “While only with us for a short time, Avery positively impacted her unit, her intercollegiate team, and her class,” Superintendent Lt. Gen. Tony Bauernfeind said in the school’s statement. “Her loss will be felt across USAFA. Our team is focused on providing support to Avery’s family, Cadet Squadron 38, the track-and-field team, and the entire academy family.”

                            The school is offering mental health and religious support services to cadets, faculty and staff who are grieving Koonce’s death.

                            Koonce graduated from Thrall High School earlier this year and joined the academy’s Class of 2028, as well as the women’s track-and-field team. She was a talented athlete who planned to major in biology and become a physical therapist for pilots, Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas), who submitted Koonce’s nomination to attend the academy, said on Facebook.

                            In March, Koonce celebrated notching a new personal record in the 100-meter dash: 12.19 seconds.

                            In a statement the academy provided to press on Sept. 7, Koonce’s parents remembered her as a “perfect daughter” who is now “in the arms of her Heavenly Father.”

                            “Avery is truly loved by so many,” Eric and Kelly Koonce said. “Loving on her brothers and learning how to live with Avery’s loss is our only focus right now. We are beyond blessed for the 19 amazing years we got to call Avery ours. We are praying for all of those that are bearing the incredible darkness of her loss.”

                            Around 4,000 cadets attend the service academy; about 1,000 graduates go on to join the Air Force and Space Force as second lieutenants each May.

                            Raytheon: AMRAAM and JATM Missiles ‘Complementary’ for Future Force Mix

                            Raytheon: AMRAAM and JATM Missiles ‘Complementary’ for Future Force Mix

                            The latest version of Raytheon’s AIM-120 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile is approaching the “threshold” range required of the new and secretive AIM-260 Joint Advanced Tactical Missile, a company executive said Sept. 10, while suggesting the two weapons may form a high/low mix for future air combat.

                            John Norman, Raytheon vice president for requirements and capabilities for air and space systems, said the AMRAAM has evolved significantly over its 30-year life. Its range is now “beyond parity” with threat missiles and it will be “complementary” to the AIM-260 JATM built by Lockheed Martin. Norman was speaking on a call with reporters to discuss ways RTX, the parent company of Raytheon, can preserve the credibility of the F-22 now that there is uncertainty about the Next-Generation Air Dominance program.

                            “The range that we can get with AMRAAM is approaching that threshold capability that the Air Force would like to have with JATM when it’s fielded operationally,” Norman said.

                            Norman would not discuss specific range performance of the AMRAAM or JATM, but industry sources have suggested the latest versions of AMRAAM can successfully intercept targets at 100 miles, while JATM is intended for targets well beyond 120 miles.  

                            The JATM—built by Lockheed Martin and about which the Air Force has said relatively little—will provide “exquisite capability for the U.S. Air Force warfighters and the Navy warfighters,” Norman said.

                            JATM will “address the advanced threat, all the countermeasures, the electronic countermeasures that the threats will employ against us. It has exquisite capability against that,” added Norman. Meanwhile, the latest AMRAAM has shown “phenomenal performance” in all those measures during testing with the Air Force.

                            “Look at AMRAAM as your capacity weapon. … It’s the affordable” weapon, said Norman. JATM, on the other hand, will be the “kick-the-door-down, very expensive weapon.” AMRAAM will be the “capacity weapon, I think, for the foreseeable future,” he said.

                            Lockheed Martin deferred all inquiries about JATM to the Air Force.

                            Norman said he believes the the two weapons are “complementary” in the Air Force’s operational assessments of the future.

                            The latest AMRAAM D3 is the result of collaborative modeling and simulation with the Air Force to address gaps in addressing the threat, Norman said. The service has shared the latest classified threat data with the company and it has recommended ways to close those gaps with weapons either in hand or in development.

                            Without getting into performance specifics, “what I can tell you is that for what we’re seeing out of the threat analysis today, we have capability with the AMRAAM today with the D3 that counters that threat,” he said.

                            One improvement is extended range and time of flight. “It’s almost double in the range of what AMRAAM flew before,” Norman claimed.

                            “We didn’t change propulsion. We just changed the way it flies for long-range shots, so it has more kinetic energy when it hits the target at that range, and it’s able to fly that very effectively. … What that does is, it brings us back into parity [with] a lot of the capability of all the pacing threats worldwide. So it makes AMRAAM kind of ‘future-proof.’”

                            The missile also has “enhanced capability against all the advanced digital radio frequency modulation [DRFM] jamming techniques that the adversaries employ to try and counter our long-range air weapons, and it’s integrated on significantly more platforms…We’re on 14 different platforms across 43 countries.”

                            With new cards, the processing time of the D3 is four times faster than the previous iteration, Norman said.

                            One of the challenges Raytheon faces is getting combat pilots to understand the full capabilities of the new AIM-120, Norman claimed.

                            “We spend a lot of time out at the Air Force weapons school, with the Air Warfare Center and with the squadrons, with the 85th Test and Evaluation Squadron, the 422 Test and Evaluation Squadron … so that the fighter pilots truly understand, here’s what the missile is capable of, and here’s some different ways that you’re going to employ it in the future,” he said.

                            The AMRAAM can also be fired from the ground, using the NASAMS (National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System), which means countries can employ it as either an air-to-air or air-to-ground weapon.

                            Many countries are donating older AMRAAMs to Ukraine to use in its NASAMS, Norman said, with some of the missiles dating back 30 years.

                            “They’re still having an effective rate of over 95 percent. And that’s just wild,” he said.

                            The future of the missile is just as bright, with increased demand and ramped-up production.

                            “Historically, we produce anywhere between 450 to 650 AMRAAMs a year across all these lots, and I think you’ve seen over the last few lots, the demand has increased up to 1,200,” Norman said. The company is involved in talks with the Air Force and the State Department about whether the weapon could be produced in another country—Japan is a leading candidate—but Norman said demand would have to reach 2,000 per year to make such a plan feasible.

                            From an industry perspective, Raytheon and “all of our suppliers, we need to see a consistent demand so that it’s there’s value in that investment. It’s not an easy process to stand up a new production. I think we’re exploring all opportunities,” Norman said.

                            He said he expected the Lot 38 buy of AMRAAM to be finalized this week.

                            Air Force’s First-Ever Private Apartment Complex Officially Coming to Edwards

                            Air Force’s First-Ever Private Apartment Complex Officially Coming to Edwards

                            On Sept. 10, Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., held a ground-breaking ceremony for the Air Force’s first-ever privatized apartment complex. While the actual construction and completion date is still to be determined, the ceremony marked the project’s approval by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, and the forthcoming complex marks a brave new world for how the Air Force contracts with private housing providers. 

                            The need is urgent: the military construction budget process is moving too slowly to stem a nationwide affordable housing shortage felt even more acutely at remote military bases such as Edwards, which is short accommodations for 307 unaccompanied service members.

                            “Just about everyone has more demand than they have availability. We’re no different,” Col. Joel Purcell, commander of the 412th Civil Engineer Group at Edwards, told Air & Space Forces Magazine. “But we hope that we’re going to be able to take care of some of the 307 unaccompanied member shortage with the apartments.” 

                            Planners hope to complete the project by summer 2026, though the official goal date is still being worked out. Once complete, the apartment complex at Edwards will feature 246 total beds split among 142 apartments. Of those apartments, 38 will be one-bedroom, one-bath, while 104 will be two-bedroom, two-bath. 

                            Dr. Ravi Chaudhary, assistant secretary of the Air Force for energy, installations, and environment, said at the ceremony that the complex will include six to eight separate, three-story buildings. He also said the amenities at the complex will include a park with a barbecue area, a fitness center, a pool, electric vehicle charging stations, and more.

                            The target demographic is service members who are no longer eligible for on-base government-owned dormitories—inhabited mostly by very junior service members fresh out of training—but who are not quite ready for the tight off-base housing market.

                            For example, a tenant of a one-bedroom unit might be an unaccompanied company grade officer like a student at Edwards’ test pilot school. Meanwhile, two post-dormitory enlisted Airmen should be able to afford a two-bedroom unit if they pool their basic allowance for housing (BAH), an allowance the military provides to offset the cost of non government-provided housing.

                            The exact rent cost for those units is still being worked out, but Purcell emphasized that Edwards is doing everything it can to keep it within a few hundred dollars of the BAH allotted for the target demographic in the Edwards area

                            The rates for privatized military family housing is based completely on BAH rates, Purcell explained. The apartment complex is based on market conditions, but the contractors, from a company called Mayroad, “are doing absolutely everything in their power to ensure” that the units are affordable for the target demographic, he said.

                            Mayroad is a privatized family housing contractor with properties at Edwards, Hurlburt Field, Fla.; Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, N.C.; McConnell Air Force Base, Kan.; and Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. 

                            “At the end of the day, Mayroad partnering with the Air Force, we are doing everything we can to ensure minimal, if any, out-of-pocket expense from those Airmen and company grade officers to be able to live in these apartments,” the colonel added.

                            A typical view from the roads surrounding Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. (Air & Space Forces Magazine photo by David Roza)

                            Also unlike military family housing, where the BAH goes directly to the contractor from the service member’s paycheck, apartment complex residents will be responsible for writing a check to Mayroad. The arrangement will be much like a commercial apartment complex off-base, except instead of being in a nearby city, this one will actually be on base, specifically on property within the Mayroad privatized family housing area, next to the Mojave Sky Community Center.

                            “The Air Force is not going to be supplementing in any way,” Purcell said. “For practical purposes, this would really be no different than if Mayroad were to finance and build an apartment building in Lancaster or Palmdale.”

                            Oversight

                            Not everyone is thrilled about the idea of privatized housing for unaccompanied Airmen. Privatized military family housing has a poor reputation stemming from inconsistent oversight and insufficient standards that led to unsafe housing and unaccountable contractors across the armed forces.

                            Rep. Deborah Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), ranking member of the House Appropriations subcommittee on military construction and veterans affairs, expressed concern at a March hearing that privatized barracks would have the same problem.

                            “I would envision us having, in the not-too-distant future, hearings like we had with family housing companies,” she told senior enlisted service members from each branch, “because the privatization process is a failure in terms of maintaining the quality of life of housing.

                            “They [private housing contractors] are willing to take massive fines just as the cost of doing business, and then they do it again,” she added.

                            When asked what oversight mechanisms will be in place for the Edwards complex, an Air Force spokesperson said the project will adhere to the same Military Housing Privatization Initiative currently in place for the family housing program.

                            “This includes the enhanced standards for safe, high-quality housing and services outlined in the FY2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) MHPI reform requirements,” the spokesperson said. “Additionally, the project incorporates the best practices and lessons learned from the family housing program to further ensure the protection of the Government’s interests.”

                            air force dormitory
                            Staff Sgt. Collin Barker, 9th Civil Engineering Squadron airmen dormitory leader, inspects a light fixture on Beale Air Force Base, California, Nov. 27, 2019. U.S. Air Force photo by Airman Jason W. Cochran.

                            Apartment complex tenants will have access to the same method of reporting maintenance issues as family housing tenants. Mayroad will be responsible for coordinating and completing those maintenance requests while the Air Force will conduct annual site visits, inspect each unit for safety and cleanliness every time it changes tenants, and provide oversight for service requests and other reported issues.

                            The Air Force and Mayroad “will also evaluate the established rental rates in alignment with annual changes to the basic allowance for housing (BAH) and consider any local market factors that could impact demand and affordability,” the spokesperson wrote.

                            “While the Edwards AFB UH Apartments Project represents a new venture for the DAF, the standards and expectations for services and quality will remain consistent with those of the family housing program,” the spokesperson added.

                            As a privatized family housing contractor, Mayroad appears to have a history of tenant satisfaction. The company claimed to be the only one to receive a “very good” rating on a 2021 military tenant satisfaction survey. At the time, Mayroad oversaw 4,000 homes at bases across the country. The Air Force could not immediately provide a copy of the survey.

                            Chaudhary spoke highly of Mayroad at the groundbreaking ceremony, which Heath Burleson, Mayroad’s president and CEO, also attended.

                            “When I talk to our families and hear about what they’re saying about Mayroad … while there are work areas, Heath, your team’s commitment and service is palpable and shows from their feedback every single day,” Chaudhary said. 

                            Earlier in March, the assistant secretary told Air & Space Forces Magazine that “If we didn’t capture all of the lessons learned from privatized housing, we wouldn’t be worth our salt,” and he indicated at the groundbreaking ceremony that he’ll be keeping an eye on the project.

                            “I hope you’re up for the challenge Heath,” he said. “I know you are, but you can be sure I’ll be back here soon for a progress update.”

                            The B-21 Raider continues to conduct flight tests in 2024 at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. USAF

                            Future Homes

                            Even when the complex is built, Edwards will still be short about 61 unaccompanied accommodations, on top of a shortage of about 119 single family homes. That gap is likely to grow as Edwards meets a surge in testing requirements for new weapons and platforms. 

                            Col. Douglas P. Wickert, commander of the 412th Test Wing, Edwards’ host unit, said the number of student test pilots is set to double amid a “booming” aerospace economy surrounding them in the Antelope Valley, “so the housing shortage here at Edwards is only going to get worse.” Highly paid civilian aerospace workers often out-compete the comparatively small rates covered by BAH, Task & Purpose reported in March.

                            In the meantime, Purcell said Edwards has invested “a significant amount of money” in renovating one of its older dormitories. He said the base is also working with local partners “to ensure that they are doing everything they can to increase the availability” of rental family housing and apartment units.

                            “What we stress is that we are really looking for clean, safe, and affordable housing,” he said.

                            Edwards has a history of suboptimal housing due to its harsh desert climate and remote location. The legendary test pilot Brig. Gen. Chuck Yeager lamented the effects of the dust and sun on his young family in his memoir “Yeager.” Wickert said married troops in the 1940s lived in a cluster of thin-walled wooden duplexes where dust blew in through the cracks in the wood and where the ever-present smell of gas used for heating and cooking gave it the nickname “Kerosene Flats.” 

                            “I don’t think anybody shed a tear when Kerosene Flats was torn down in 1954,” he said.

                            Edwards is far from the only remote Air Force base in need of safe, clean, or affordable housing, which is why dignitaries at the ceremony said the apartments there could set a template for the rest of the service.

                            “Today isn’t just about inaugurating a new building,” Chaudhary said. “It’s about setting a world class standard for our Airmen and our Guardians, especially at remote and isolated installations.”

                            The base has a long record of firsts, including Yeager’s first flight beyond the speed of sound and the first flights of countless weapons and platforms. This could be the first flight of a very different, but equally important, part of Air Force history, Wickert said.

                            “It is your turn to ring the bell at Pancho’s on Friday,” he told the 412th Civil Engineer Group, “because you’ve got the latest first.”